NHBC Standards 2019 4

STANDARDS
NHBC
Standards
2019
Effective from 1 January 2019
Land quality
– managing ground conditions
CHAPTER 4.1
This chapter gives guidance on meeting the
Technical Requirements for assessing and
managing land quality.
4.1.1 Compliance 01
4.1.2 Initial Assessment – desk study
(all sites) 03
4.1.3 Initial Assessment – walkover survey
(all sites) 04
4.1.4 Initial Assessment – results 04
4.1.5 Basic Investigation
(sites where hazards are not
identified or suspected) 05
4.1.6 Detailed Investigation
(sites where hazards are identified
or suspected) 05
4.1.7 Managing the risks
(sites where hazards are found) 06
4.1.8 Unforeseen hazards 07
4.1.9 Documentation and verification 07
4.1.10 Guidance for investigations 07
4.1.11 Further information 08
1
Land quality – managing ground conditions 2019
CHAPTER 4.1
Introduction
This chapter provides a framework for managing geotechnical and contamination risks, with the objective of
ensuring that:
all sites are properly assessed and investigated for potential geotechnical and contamination hazards
foundations and substructure designs are suitable for the ground conditions
sites are properly remediated where necessary or appropriate, and design precautions are taken
appropriate documentation and verification is provided to NHBC.
4.1.1
Compliance Also see: Chapter 4.2
Assessment of the site and the surrounding area shall comply with the Technical Requirements.
Items to be taken into account include:
a) suitability of persons for the level of investigation
b) geotechnical and contamination issues
c) investigation procedures
d) notification in writing to NHBC of hazardous ground conditions.
4.1
Ground investigations and management of risk that complies with the guidance in this chapter will generally be acceptable.
Suitable persons for the level of investigation

The following skills and knowledge are required from the person responsible for the Initial Assessment, Basic Investigation and
documentation and verification. They should:
understand the hazards that can affect the development
collect information relating to such hazards on and

and where they originate adjacent to the site
recognise the signs of potential hazards
report the findings in a clear and concise manner

conduct a desk study and walkover survey
determine when specialist advice and detailed testing

is required.
The following criteria should be used as guidance for the appointment of a consultant or specialist responsible for Detailed
Investigation, management of hazards, documentation and verification:
Experience Similar types of site and development.
Appropriate discipline(s) Understanding of all relevant skills required on the project and access to other disciplines,
including geologists, hydrogeologists, toxicologists and environmental chemists.
Legislation Understanding of legislation and liabilities associated with the site.
Professional indemnity insurance Appropriate cover for the work being carried out.
Health and safety Awareness of occupational hygiene issues and Health and Safety legislation.
Quality assurance Use of a quality management system, including appropriately accredited laboratories.
Project management Ability to manage a project team consisting of the appropriate disciplines.
Site investigation Ability to design site investigation programmes, including soil sampling, testing and
laboratory analysis.
Risk management Ability to conduct risk assessments as required by the risk management process.
Reporting and communication Ability to prepare comprehensive and well presented reports. Effective communication
within their organisation and with the client, statutory authorities and the general public.
Engineering design Understanding of effective risk reduction techniques, e.g. engineered foundations and
substructure details of suitable remediation.
Geotechnical and contamination issues

Assessment should be carried out by direct investigation and examination of the ground, supplemented by laboratory testing
where necessary, in order to determine the geotechnical and contamination characteristics of the site.
Specifically, where contamination is suspected or found, the site should be assessed using the Source-Pathway-Receptor
framework (known as the pollutant linkage).
For land contamination to occur, a source, pathway and receptor must all exist. A written or diagrammatic representation of the
land contamination (known as a Conceptual Model), should be produced to show the possible relationships between each.
Land quality – managing ground conditions 2019 2
CHAPTER 4.1
Procedure
The process to assess and manage the ground conditions Initial Assessment:
■ desk study
is as follows: ■ walkover study
■ results.
Initial Assessment
NHBC requires all sites to be assessed by a desk study and Hazards known
or suspected?
a walkover survey. The results should be used to determine
No Yes
whether or not hazards are known or suspected. Basic Investigation Detailed Investigation
Basic Investigation
Required to support the results of the Initial Assessment where Further Assessment:
geotechnical and
hazards are not suspected. contamination risks
acceptable?
Detailed Investigation Yes No
Required where hazards are known or suspected. Further Investigation
required? Yes
Further Assessment No
Required after the Basic or Detailed Investigation has been
4.1
Manage risks
conducted, to confirm that all objectives have been met. Where
results are inconclusive, further investigation will be required.
Provide documentation
Hazards and verification
Where hazards are identified, design precautions or
remediation will be required to minimise their effects. Start construction phase
If any unforeseen hazards are found during the course of

Unforeseen hazards
construction, further investigation may be required. Yes
No
Documentation and verification
Finish construction
NHBC requires documentation and verification to show that: phase
the site has been properly assessed and investigated

where necessary, suitable precautions are incorporated

into the design
all necessary remediation has been carried out.

Notification of potential hazards and associated risks
If a site (defined in the Rules as an area of land that is covered by a single detailed planning consent or series of consents
relating to continuous development) is classed as ‘hazardous’, NHBC must be notified in writing a minimum of eight weeks
before work starts. Failure to provide such information may delay the registration process, the construction work and the issuing
of NHBC warranty.
3
CHAPTER 4.1
Table 1: Potential hazards and associated risks

Potential hazard Associated risk
High water table or low-lying land flooding

the effects from toxic or noxious materials which could be concentrated or

transported by ground water.
Mining (past, present and proposed) ground movement as a result of the type of mining and materials extracted

ground gasses, including methane and carbon dioxide.

Trees shrinkage and heave of clay soils

physical damage caused by roots.

Peat acid attack

changes in volume due to variations in moisture content

production of methane and carbon dioxide.

Infill and made ground, including tipping
release of gases which may be explosive or asphyxiating
low bearing capacity causing excessive total and/or differential settlements

consolidation characteristics which may result in subsidence, settlement and/or

excessive tilt
localised ground variability (laterally and with depth) which may result in

4.1
subsidence, settlement and/or excessive tilt

collapse compression or inundation settlement of non-cohesive fills which may

result in subsidence, settlement and/or excessive tilt.
Low bearing capacity ground settlement of foundations and substructures.

Former buildings or structures underground obstructions producing variations in bearing capacity and

settlement characteristics.
Adjacent buildings effect on stability of both new and existing buildings.

Drains, including land drains contamination, flooding, waterlogging and interruption of land drainage systems.

Sulfates in ground or ground water expansive reaction

chemical attack on concrete, mortar and bricks or blocks made with cement.

Contamination from substances which may be carcinogenic, toxic, asphyxiating, corrosive,

phytotoxic, combustive, explosive or radioactive.
Solution features in chalk and limestone,
underground cavities.
including swallow holes
Unstable ground subject to landslip ground movement.

Seas, lakes and rivers adjacent to land erosion.

4.1.2
Initial Assessment – desk study (all sites)
A desk study of the site and the surrounding area, that covers key and existing site information, shall be
undertaken by a suitable person and include investigation of soils, geology, surface water, ground water,
current and historical uses.
A desk study is the collection and examination of existing information obtained from a wide variety of sources. It should indicate
potential hazards at an early stage and provide a basis for the investigation. Potential problems should be assessed according to
the current and historical uses of the site and surrounding area, including those which may have been left by:
industrial, commercial and agricultural uses,
quarrying

including storage landfilling and tipping.

mining

Key information sources include:
the Environment Agency or its equivalent – for example,
utility companies

coastal erosion, landfill sites, details of water abstraction county records offices, libraries, museums and

the local authority – for example planning and
local history sources
environmental health soil survey maps

British Geological Survey, maps and information
the site vendor

Ordnance Survey, current and previous editions of plans
in-house information

and aerial photographs ongoing monitoring.

Coal Authority, mining reports – past, present and

proposed mining
CHAPTER 4.1
4.1.3
Initial Assessment – walkover survey (all sites)
To assess ground conditions, a walkover survey of the site and the surrounding area shall be undertaken
by a suitable person.
A walkover survey is a direct inspection of the site and the surrounding area carried out in conjunction with the desk study.
Indications of any potential hazards should provide a basis for the investigation. A photographic record of the site can help in the
reporting of the walkover survey.
Table 2: Potential hazards
Source of information Items to be taken into account
Topography abrupt changes in slope

valley bottoms or depressions which may be soft or filled

evidence of overburden on slopes

excavations at the base of the slope

signs of landslip, e.g. tilting trees, posts or walls

signs of subsidence

evidence of imported soil including local surface depressions, tipped material or rubbish,

4.1
particularly if it is hot or has an odour.
Soils and rocks the basic ground type

evidence of peat, silt or other highly compressible material at or below the surface

cracking or stickiness of the surface which may indicate a shrinkable sub-soil

sudden changes in conditions, e.g. clay to chalk or soil to rock.

Surface water a high water table indicated, e.g. by waterlogged ground

and vegetation signs of flooding

reeds or water-loving plants

springs, ponds, wells, ditches or streams

the source of any discoloured water.

Vegetation vegetation which may indicate the nature of the soils

sparse dead or dying vegetation

type and condition of vegetation on land adjoining the site

species, height and condition of the trees

species, height, spread and condition of hedges and scrub on clay

evidence of former trees, hedges or scrub on clay.

Structural information damage to structures, e.g. cracking in buildings, on or around the site

other evidence of movement, e.g. tilting or distortion

any structures or services below ground.

Local information local knowledge of the site, e.g. mining, refuse tipping or flooding

local industrial history records indicating past and present uses of the site

place names and street names that may give clues to previous site usage,

e.g. Brickfield Cottage, Water Lane.
4.1.4
Initial Assessment – results
The results of the desk study and walkover survey shall be recorded and evaluated by a suitable person.
Initial results should be evaluated for suspected hazards and the results recorded, and include the following as appropriate:
site plans, including dates, previous and current uses,
photographs, including aerial photographs, showing points

and proposed site layout of interest or concern (e.g. areas of ground instability),
geology of the site, including geological maps, previous
interpretation of aerial photographs, and dates
site investigations and laboratory test results of photographs
list of sources of information consulted and copies of the

information obtained.
5
CHAPTER 4.1
4.1.5
Basic Investigation (sites where hazards are not identified or suspected) Also see: BS EN 1997-2
Where hazards are not suspected, a Basic Investigation of the site, including geotechnical and
contamination investigations, shall be carried out by a suitable person and recorded to the satisfaction of
NHBC.
The Basic Investigation aims to provide assurance for all sites, regardless of how free of hazards they may appear, and forms
the minimum requirement for a site investigation.
The number and depth of trial pits should be located so they are representative of the site and will depend upon the:
proposed development
inconsistency of the soil and geology across the site.

nature of the site

Trial pits should be located outside the proposed foundation area, and generally be a minimum of 3m deep. The distance from
the edge of the foundation should not be less than the depth of the trial pit. Where trial pits do not provide sufficient information,
boreholes will be necessary.
Basic geotechnical and contamination investigations should be conducted and include:
physical tests, such as plasticity index tests, to support the
a basic contamination investigation based on sampling and

4.1
results of the Initial Assessment testing of soil taken from trial pits during the
geotechnical investigation.
During the excavation of the trial pits, the use of sight and smell may help to identify certain contaminants.
If the Basic Investigation reveals the presence of geotechnical and/or contamination hazards, or has not addressed all of the
original objectives, or where there is any doubt about the condition of the ground, further Detailed Investigation should be
conducted.
4.1.6
Detailed Investigation (sites where hazards are identified or suspected)
Where hazards are identified or suspected, a Detailed Investigation of the site shall be conducted under
the supervision of a consultant or specialist acceptable to NHBC to determine and report on the nature and
extent of the conditions.
A Detailed Investigation should be carried out where hazards are identified or suspected:
from the outset
from the Basic Investigation.

from the initial results of the desktop study and walkover

survey, or
A consultant or specialist acceptable to NHBC should be appointed to:

design and supervise the Detailed Investigation
present all the factual data obtained from the

Detailed Investigation.
In addition to the Basic Investigation, the Detailed Investigation should adopt a clearly defined, structured approach,
gathering information which considers the:
immediate site and the adjacent area
presence of soil gas (if there is any possibility a full gas

possibility of future development in the vicinity of the site
investigation should be carried out and include
nature of the development
flow measurements)
complexity of the ground conditions
surface water and ground water conditions, soils and

extent of influence of the proposed foundations
geology, and site history.
The problems and liabilities which have to be managed in order to develop the site should be clearly communicated in the
Detailed Investigation report.
Further investigation should be conducted if the Detailed Investigation has not satisfactorily addressed all of the
original objectives.
CHAPTER 4.1
4.1.7
Managing the risks (sites where hazards are found)
Hazardous ground conditions shall be satisfactorily managed under the supervision of a consultant or
specialist acceptable to NHBC. Items to be taken into account include:
a) design precautions c) a method statement and report.
b) remediation techniques
The consultant or specialist should:

identify any results which show that design precautions
make recommendations for appropriate design precautions

and/or remediation may be necessary as necessary, including all underground services on the
conduct a risk assessment to determine appropriate design
site and any ground improvement techniques
precautions and/or remedial treatment ensure the works are appropriately supervised

specify the options for remediating any contamination
produce a remediation report.

that may be present and provide a remediation method
statement
The proposed solutions for dealing with geotechnical and/or contamination hazards should make due allowance for any
constraints that apply, for example:
4.1
factors associated with the site and surrounding area
local and statutory requirements should be met to avoid

which could restrict the design precautions or remediation abortive works
techniques should be identified time constraints may influence the choice of solution, but

do not alter the requirement for effective remediation.
Design precautions
Solutions for dealing with geotechnical hazards include:
specialist foundations such as rafts, piling and ground beams
ground improvement techniques such as vibro,

dynamic compaction and surcharging.
Remediation techniques
Solutions for dealing with contamination hazards include:
risk avoidance by changing the pathway or isolating the
process-based treatment to remove, modify, stabilise or

target, by adjusting the layout and/or by building protective destroy contaminants by physical, biological,
measures into the construction chemical or thermal means.
engineering-based treatments that remove or isolate

contaminants or modify the pathway by excavation,
providing ground barriers or covering and capping
Remediation method statement and report
The remediation method statement should detail the strategy for the site and include the:
original risk assessment, identification of the remediation
working method for implementing remediation

objectives and outline information for the method chosen waste classification and methods for control and disposal

remediation objectives for ground, ground water and
proposed supervision and monitoring of remediation

soil gas validation sampling and testing to be implemented.

The report should include the following information:
photographic records, especially for work which will be
details of soil movements and waste transfer notes

buried (e.g. membranes) results of post-remediation sampling (laboratory certificates

site diaries or drawings, environmental supervisor’s site diary
should be provided in appendices)
and independent witness statements where appropriate validation test results

accurate surveys of the levels and position of all
results of monitoring

remediated areas details of all consultations and meetings with

a description of any remedial materials used
statutory authorities.
7
CHAPTER 4.1
4.1.8
Unforeseen hazards
Where additional or unforeseen hazards arise during construction, the builder shall ensure investigation
and management satisfactory to NHBC.
Where additional or unforeseen hazards arise, specialist advice is required so that the hazard is properly investigated,
managed and verified.
4.1.9
Documentation and verification
Documentation and verification shall be provided to the satisfaction of NHBC to demonstrate that the site
is suitable for the proposed development. All relevant information, designs, specifications and reports shall
be produced in a clearly understandable format and distributed to appropriate personnel.
Where the site is within an area susceptible to radon, it will be necessary to follow appropriate guidance in the building
regulations and associated documents. The information detailed in Table 3 should be provided to NHBC.
Table 3: Information required by NHBC
Geotechnical hazards present: Yes No Yes No
4.1
Contamination hazards present: Yes Yes No No

Initial Assessment, Further Assessment and Basic Investigation ■ ■ ■ ■
Detailed Investigation ■ ■ ■
Proposals to manage geotechnical risks ■ ■
Proposals to manage contamination risks ■ ■
Verification evidence ■ ■ ■ ■
Note
Evidence may still be required by NHBC to substantiate that contamination and hazards are not present on the site.
4.1.10
Guidance for investigations Also see: BS EN 1997-2
Site investigations shall be undertaken in accordance with BS EN 1997-2 and recognised practice. Items to
be taken into account include:
a) investigation technique
b) sampling
c) testing.
Investigation technique
A site investigation normally comprises techniques which are classed as either indirect or direct.
Indirect investigations use geophysical techniques, including electromagnetic, resistivity, seismic, gravity and ground radar,
to interpret ground conditions. Conducted from the surface, they measure variations in properties of the ground, both horizontally
and vertically, to define subsurface conditions. Geophysical methods rely on contrasts in the physical properties, for example,
between sand and gravel and rockhead. Contrast may also be provided by faulting, underground cables and pipelines or by
cavities.
Direct investigation techniques involve intrusive activities to enable the retrieval and examination of the ground using trial pits,
trenches, boreholes or probes.
Trial pits allow the detailed inspection, logging, sampling and in-situ testing of large volumes of natural soil or fill and the
assessment of ground water conditions. Trenches are extended trial pits, or linked trial pits, which are excavated where greater
exposure of the ground conditions is required. Trial pits and trenches should be positioned where they will not affect future
foundations.
Boreholes are typically formed using the following techniques:
Light cable percussion drilling A shell and auger rig – typically used in the UK to drill boreholes in soils and weak rocks.
Continuous flight auger Exploratory boreholes may be drilled in soils by mechanical continuous flight augers of
various sizes. Hollow stem methods are typically employed where sample retrieval is required.
Rotary drilling Either open-hole drilling or rotary coring, is used to investigate rock and sometimes stiff soils,
such as boulder clay.
Probing techniques Used to analyse the relative density of soils and for environmental sampling and monitoring
(such as chemical and physical testing of gases, liquids and solids).
CHAPTER 4.1
Sampling
The number and type of samples taken should be:
appropriate for the results of the desk study, the walkover
taken, stored and transported so that they avoid

survey and the site investigation cross-contamination.
appropriate for the range of ground materials encountered

and the proposed development
Samples are used to enable soil and rock descriptions to be made and to provide material for physical and chemical testing.
‘Undisturbed’ soil and rock samples undergo minimal disturbance, so provide a more reliable indication of the physical soil
properties than ‘disturbed’ samples.
Ground water should be collected from appropriately designed monitoring wells which should be screened and sealed to ensure
that the relevant stratum is being monitored.
Gas sampling should be carried out from appropriately designed monitoring wells, boreholes or window sampling holes are
typically used. Identification of the probable source and the measurement of gas flow are important for risk assessments.
Testing
4.1
Testing may be undertaken in-situ, or in a laboratory.
A wide variety of in-situ tests can be used to support the results of direct testing. These range from basic tests undertaken by
geologists or engineers using simple hand-held devices or portable test kits to methods that require specialist personnel
and equipment.
Testing laboratories should participate in quality assurance programmes and be accredited for relevant tests by bodies such as
UKAS and MCERTS. Physical tests on soil and rock materials are carried out to provide the following information on ground:
strength
settlement

relative density
consolidation characteristics

deformation
permeability.

Chemical tests on soils, rocks, ground water and gases can be carried out to provide an indication of potential contamination
on the site.
4.1.11
Further information

BRE: Report BR211 – ‘Radon: Guidance on protective
Special publications 101 – 112 – ‘Remedial treatment for
measures for new dwellings’ contaminated land’

Report BR212 – ‘Construction of new buildings on
DCLG and its predecessor departments
gas-contaminated land’
Approved Documents A and C – ‘Structures and site

Report BR376 – ‘Radon: guidance on protective measures preparation and resistance to contaminants and moisture’
for new dwellings in Scotland’ Report BR413 –
DEFRA and its predecessor departments
‘Radon: guidance on protective measures for new
CLAN 02/05 ‘Soil guideline values and the determination of
dwellings in Northern Ireland’ land as contaminated land under Part 2A’

Report BR414 – ‘Protective measures for housing on gas
Environmental Protection Act 1990:Part 2A Contaminated
contaminated land’ Land Statutory Guidance - April 2012

Digest 383 – ‘Site investigation for low-rise buildings:
Department of the Environment Industry Profiles –
Soil description’ ‘Information on the processes, materials and wastes

BS 10175 – ‘Investigation of potentially contaminated sites’ associated with individual industries’

BS EN ISO 14688 – ‘Geotechnical investigation and
Department of the Environment – Waste Management
testing. Identification and classification of soil: Part 1. Paper No 27 – ‘Landfill Gas: A technical memorandum on
Identification and description. Part 2. Principles for a the monitoring and control of landfill gas’
classification’
CLR11 ‘Model procedures for the management of

BS EN ISO 22476 – ‘Geotechnical investigation and land contamination’
testing. Field testing’
CLEA (Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment)

BS 8485 – ‘Code of practice for the design of protective guidance and software Science Reports SR 1,2,3 and 7
measures for methane and carbon dioxide ground gases
‘Guidance for the safe development of housing on land
for new buildings.’ affected by contamination’.

C665 – ‘Assessing risks posed by hazardous ground
gasses to buildings’
Building near trees
CHAPTER 4.2
Technical Requirements when building near trees,
hedgerows and shrubs, particularly in shrinkable soils.
4.2.1 Compliance 01
4.2.2 Provision of information 01
4.2.3 Building near trees 02
4.2.4 The effects of trees on shrinkable soils 03
4.2.5 Foundations in all soil types 06
4.2.6 Excavation of foundations 06
4.2.7 Foundations in shrinkable soils 06
4.2.8 Design and construction of
foundations in shrinkable soils 08
4.2.9 Foundation depths for specific conditions
in shrinkable soils 09
4.2.10 Heave precautions 10
4.2.11 New drainage 13
4.2.12 Foundation depth charts 13
4.2.13 Foundation depth tables 16
4.2.14 Example 22
4.2.15 Further information 24
1
Building near trees 2019
CHAPTER 4.2
Introduction
The combination of shrinkable soils and trees, hedgerows or shrubs represents a hazard to structures that requires
special consideration. Trees, hedgerows and shrubs take moisture from the ground and, in cohesive soils such as clay,
this can cause significant volume changes resulting in ground movement. This has the potential to affect foundations
and damage the supported structure. In order to minimise this risk, foundations should be designed to accommodate
the movement or be taken to a depth where the likelihood of damaging movement is low.
This chapter gives guidance for common foundation types to deal with the hazard and includes suitable foundation
depths which have been established from field data, research, NHBC data and practical experience. The depths are
not those at which root activity, desiccation and ground movement are non-existent, but they are intended to provide
an acceptable level of risk. However, if significant quantities of roots are unexpectedly encountered in the base of the
trench, the excavation may need to be deepened.
The interaction between trees, soil and buildings is dependent on many factors and is inherently complex. The
relationship becomes less predictable as factors combine to produce extreme conditions. These are signified by the
need for deeper foundations. Depths greater than 2.5m indicate that conditions exist where prescriptive guidance is
less reliable.
The services of a specialist arboriculturalist may be helpful for the identification of the type and condition of trees that
may affect building work. This includes trees both on and adjacent to the site.
4.2
Consideration has been given to the potential effects of climate change in the guidance provided.
The following situations are beyond the scope of the guidance in this chapter and will require a site-specific
assessment by an engineer (see Technical Requirement R5):
Foundations deeper than 2.5m within the influence of trees.
Ground with a slope of greater than 1 in 7 (approximately 8°) and man-made slopes such as embankments and
cuttings.
Underpinning.
4.2.1
When building near trees, hedgerows or shrubs, all foundations shall comply with the Technical
Requirements.
Foundations near trees, hedgerows or shrubs that comply with the guidance in this chapter will generally be acceptable.
4.2.2
Provision of information
Designs and specifications shall be produced in a clearly understandable format, include all relevant
information and be distributed to appropriate personnel.
The site plan should show the trees and hedgerows that affect the ground and works, as well as the type, depth and dimensions
of the foundations that fall within their influence. Where trees or hedgerows are either not shown or are in different positions and
shrinkable soil is identified, it may be necessary to adjust the foundation depths on site.
All necessary dimensions and levels should be indicated and relate to at least one benchmark and reference points on the site.
Details should be provided with respect to:
technical method statements
original and final ground levels

critical sequences of construction
planting schedules

site layout
dimensions, type and depth of foundations

site investigation
locations and detailing of steps in foundations,

soil volume change potential
movement and construction joints, ducts and services
survey, including location and height of trees and
passing through the foundations
hedgerows affecting the site location of services

tree species (including existing, removed and proposed)
design of drainage systems.

using English names
Building near trees 2019 2
CHAPTER 4.2
4.2.3
Building near trees Also see: Technical Requirements R5 and BS 5837
When building near trees, hedgerows or shrubs, the designs shall take account of:
a) physical growth of young trees
b) protection of remaining trees and hedgerows
c) removal of existing trees and hedgerows.
Before the site is cleared, a survey is required to record the location, heights and species of trees, hedgerows and shrubs on and
adjacent to the site, which may affect the proposed development.
If the location of previously removed vegetation is not known, local enquiries and reference to aerial photographs should be
carried out. Alternatively, the design should assume the worst conditions, or an engineer consulted to undertake a site-specific
design based on all relevant information and in accordance with Technical Requirement R5.
Where root growth is noted within shrinkable soil and where records are not available, an engineer should be consulted to
assess whether volume change is likely.
Physical growth of young trees

Damage to foundations resulting from the growth of trees and roots should be avoided by locating structures and services at a
4.2
safe distance. Where this cannot be achieved, precautions which allow for future growth should be taken which include:
reinforcing foundations to resist lateral forces
laying paving and other surfaces on a flexible base to allow

bridging walls or structural slabs over the roots, allowing
for some movement.
sufficient clearance or reinforcing to avoid cracking
Protection of remaining trees and hedgerows

Roots often extend to distances in excess of the height of the tree, the majority are within 600mm of the surface and project
radially. All parts of the system are easily susceptible to damage which may not regenerate and which can affect the stability of
the tree.
This can be caused by:
stripping topsoil too close to trees
the compaction of soil around trees by heavy plant

excavating trenches for foundations and services too close
the storage of heavy materials around trees

to trees covering the rooting area with impervious surfaces.

raising soil levels adjacent to trees, particularly where

non-granular materials are used
Trees should be protected from damage by:

a fence or barrier. The fence or barrier should extend
ensuring services are not routed close to trees or, where

around a single trunk equivalent to a circle of radius 12 this is impractical, are installed in such a way as to
times the trunk diameter measured 1.5m above ground minimise root damage.
level.
The shape of this area may change depending on specific
factors such as local drainage, soil type, age and species
of the tree. An arboriculturist may be required to assess
these factors
Removal of existing trees and hedgerows

Statutory Requirements, planning conditions, conservation area restrictions or tree preservation orders may result in protected
trees and hedgerows being retained. The local planning authority should be consulted.
Dead trees and hedgerows should be removed. Unstable trees should be made steady or felled. If necessary, specialist advice
should be obtained from a registered arboriculturalist.
3
CHAPTER 4.2
4.2.4 Also see: Arboricultural Advisory and Information Service, Arboricultural

The effects of trees on shrinkable soils Association, BRE Digest 240 and local geological survey maps
Foundations shall be designed to make allowance for the effect of trees, hedgerows and shrubs on
shrinkable soils. Items to be taken into account include:
a) soil classification, shrinkage and heave
b) water demand, tree heights and zone of influence of trees
c) climate.
Soil classification, shrinkage and heave

Shrinkable soils, that are widely distributed throughout the UK, often change volume as moisture content fluctuates seasonally
and as a result of factors, including the action of tree roots. The resulting shrinkage or swelling can cause subsidence or heave
damage to foundations, the structures they support and services.
The following definitions are used to classify soil properties:
Shrinkable soils Over 35% fine particles and a Modified Plasticity Index of 10% or greater.
Fine particles Nominal diameter less than 60μm, i.e. clay and silt particles.
Plasticity Index (Ip) A measure of volume change potential determined by Atterberg Limits tests. These tests are carried
4.2
out on the fine particles and any medium and fine sand particles. Soil particles with a nominal
diameter greater than 425μm are removed by sieving beforehand and the smaller particles analysed.
This is a requirement of BS 1377 which specifies the test procedure.
Modified Plasticity Defined as the Ip of the soil multiplied by the percentage of particles less than 425μm.
Index (I’p) I’p = Ip x % less than 425μm
100%
Table 1: Modified Plasticity Index related to volume change potential

Modified Plasticity Index Volume change potential
40% and greater High
20% to less than 40% Medium
10% to less than 20% Low
Alternatively, the Plasticity Index may be used without modification. For pure clays and other soils with 100% of particles less
than 425μm, the result will be the same. However, for mixed soils such as glacial tills, use of the Modified Plasticity Index may
result in a more economic design.
The volume change potential should be established from site investigation and reliable local knowledge of the geology.
Sufficient samples should be taken to provide confidence that the results are representative. High volume change potential
should be assumed if the volume change potential is unknown.
Water demand, tree heights and lateral zone of tree influence

Water demand varies according to tree species and size. Water demand categories of common tree species are given in the
table below.
Where the species of a tree has not been identified, high water demand should be assumed.
Where the species of a tree has been identified but is not listed, the assumptions about water demand as listed in Table 2 may
be made for broad-leafed trees:
Table 2: Water demand of broad-leaf trees by species
Tree species Water demand
All elms, eucalyptus, hawthorn, oaks, poplars and willows High water demand
All others Moderate water demand
Table 3 shows the water demand categories and the average mature heights to which healthy trees of the species may be
expected to grow in favourable ground and environmental conditions. This information:
should be used for trees that are to remain or are
may be used even when actual heights are greater.

scheduled to be planted
CHAPTER 4.2
Table 3: Water demand of tree species in relation to their height

High water Mature height (m) Moderate water Mature height (m) Low water Mature height (m)
demand species demand species demand species
Broad-leafed trees:
English elm 24 Acacia (False) 18 Birch 14
Wheatley elm 22 Alder 18 Elder 10
Wych elm 18 Apple 10 Fig 8
Eucalyptus 18 Ash 23 Hazel 8
Hawthorn 10 Bay laurel 10 Holly 12
English oak 20 Beech 20 Honey locust 14
Holm oak 16 Blackthorn 8 Hornbeam 17
Red oak 24 Japanese cherry 9 Laburnum 12
Turkey oak 24 Laurel cherry 8 Magnolia 9
Hybrid black poplar 28 Orchard cherry 12 Mulberry 9
Lombardy poplar 25 Wild cherry 17 Tulip tree 20
White poplar 15 Horse chestnut 20
4.2
Crack willow 24 Sweet chestnut 24
Weeping willow 16 Lime 22
White willow 24 Japanese maple 8
Norway maple 18
Mountain ash 11
Pear 12
Plane 26
Plum 10
Sycamore 22
Tree of heaven 20
Walnut 18
Whitebeam 12
Coniferous trees:
Lawson’s cypress 18 Cedar 20
Leyland cypress 20 Douglas fir 20
Monterey cypress 20 Larch 20
Monkey puzzle 18
Pine 20
Spruce 18
Wellingtonia 30
Yew 12
Tree identification can be assisted by reference to a tree recognition book. Information may be obtained from suitable alternative
authoritative sources for trees not listed in this chapter.
When the species is known but the subspecies is not, the greatest height listed for the species should be assumed.
Where hedgerows contain trees, their effect should be assessed separately and the height of the species likely to have the
greatest effect should be used.
5
CHAPTER 4.2
Table 3a: Guidance for factors affecting the mature height and water demand of trees
Influencing factor Guidance
Heavy crown reduction The mature height should be used, or a registered arboricuturalist should be consulted to undertake
or pollarding (previously a site-specific assessment.
or planned)
Removal of trees The water demand of a semi-mature tree may be equal to that of a mature tree, though for a sapling
(previously or planned) or young tree will be significantly less.
mature height Height H should be determined in accordance
with this diagram when:
in this range use deriving foundation depths when trees have
H = mature height been removed, based on tree height at the
as listed in Table 3
time of removal
50%
checking the appropriate level from which
depths should be measured when trees
remain and the ground level is increased,
in this range use
H = actual height based on tree height at time of construction
relative to original ground level, or
determining if heave precautions are to
4.2
be provided, based on tree height at time

of construction.
Table 3b: Zone of influence (lateral extent) of trees.

Water demand Zone of influence
High 1.25 x mature height
Moderate 0.75 x mature height
Low 0.5 x mature height
Climate
High rainfall reduces moisture deficits caused by trees
and hedgerows, while cool, damp weather reduces the
rate of water loss from trees thus reducing the risk of Thurso 0.50m (500mm)
soil movement.
Wick
The driest and hottest areas in the UK generally exist in 0.45m (450mm)
southeast England; therefore, the greatest risk occurs in that Dingwall
area and diminishes with distance north and west. A 50mm Inverness Peterhead
Aberdeen 0.40m (400mm)
decrease can be made to the foundation depth Fort William
determined in accordance with this chapter for every Pitlochry
Montrose
50 miles distance north and west of London. Where it Oban Perth 0.35m (350mm)
is unclear which zone applies, the lower reduction value

Dunbar
should be used. Glasgow Edinburgh Berwick Upon Tweed 0.30m (300mm)
Ayr
Londonderry Dumfries 0.25m (250mm)

Newcastle Tynemouth
Carlisle
Belfast Darlington Middlesbrough
Enniskillen Scarborough 0.20m (200mm)
Barrow-in-Furness
Douglas Lancaster York
Blackpool Leeds Hull
0.15m (150mm)
Manchester
Holyhead Grimsby
Liverpool Lincoln
Conwy Chester
Skegness
Stoke on Trent Derby 0.10m (100mm)
Shrewsbury Stafford Norwich

Aberystwyth Kings Lynn Yarmouth
Leicester Lowestoft
Cardigan Worcester Birmingham Cambridge 0.05m (50mm)
Brecon Banbury
Cheltenham Colchester Ipswich
Pembroke Swansea
Newport Oxford
Cardiff Chelmsford
Swindon
Ilfracombe Bristol Reading London Margate
Salisbury Winchester
Barnstaple Dover
Taunton Southampton Brighton
Exeter Poole
Portsmouth Hastings
St. Austell Plymouth Weymouth
Penzance
CHAPTER 4.2
4.2.5
Foundations in all soil types
Foundations in all soil types shall be appropriately designed and constructed to transmit loads to the
ground safely and without excessive movement.
Different foundation types should not be used to support the same structure unless the foundation and superstructure design are
undertaken by an engineer.
Freestanding masonry walls should be constructed on foundations in accordance with this chapter or designed to accommodate
potential ground movement, for example, by careful use of movement joints and reinforcement.
4.2.6
Excavation of foundations Also see: Chapter 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and Technical Requirement R5
Excavation of foundations shall take account of the design and be suitable to receive concrete.
Where trench bottoms become excessively dried or softened due to rain or ground water, the excavation should be re-bottomed
prior to concreting.
Foundation depths should be measured on the centre line of the excavation and from ground level determined from
4.2
Clause 4.2.9.
Some root activity may be expected below the depths determined in accordance with this guidance. However, if significant
quantities of roots are unexpectedly encountered in the base of the trench, an engineer should be consulted to determine if the
excavation should be deepened.
4.2.7
Foundations in shrinkable soils Also see: NHBC Foundation Depth Calculator App. www.nhbc.co.uk/apps
Foundations shall be capable of accommodating the effects of trees, shrubs and hedgerows on shrinkable
soils without excessive movement. Items to be taken into account include:
a) foundation type
b) distance between tree and foundation
c) method of assessment of foundation depths
d) foundation depths related to the zone of influence of new tree planting
e) foundation depths related to new shrub planting.
Landscape and foundation designs should be compatible, and planting schedules produced by a qualified landscape architect or
other suitably qualified person and agreed with the local planning authority before work commences on site.
Foundation type
Foundations to all permanent structures, including garages, porches and conservatories, should take account of the effects of
soil desiccation. Foundation types that are acceptable in shrinkable soils include strip, trench fill, pier and beam, pile and beam,
and raft, providing they:
are capable of supporting the applied loads without
include suitable heave precautions.

undue settlement
Variations to the foundation depths derived from this chapter may be permitted where:
it is necessary to take account of local ground conditions
designed in accordance with Technical Requirement R5.

other foundation depths are traditionally acceptable

Root barriers are not an acceptable alternative to the guidance given.
Distance between tree and foundation

The distance (D) between the centre of the trunk and the nearest face of the foundation should be used to derive the
foundation depths.
D = 2m where trees which have been, or are to be, removed from within 2m of the face of the proposed foundation are less
than 50% of the mature height as given in Table 3. This is to avoid a situation where, for example, a ‘sapling’ removed from the
foundation line would otherwise require an unnecessarily deep foundation since the D/H value would always be zero, regardless
of the height H of the tree.
7
CHAPTER 4.2
Method of assessment of foundation depths

Foundation depths should be determined according to the
guidance provided in this document. If in doubt, assume the
worst conditions or consult an engineer. Foundations deeper
than 2.5m should be designed by an engineer in accordance
with Technical Requirement R5.
One of the following methods may be used to assess the
foundation depth where foundations are in the zone of
influence of existing or proposed trees.
Foundation Depth Calculator App.

www.nhbc.co.uk/apps
Method Taking account of Comments

Design in accordance site investigation
The most onerous conditions should
4.2
with this chapter to a soil volume change potential

be assumed in the absence of
depth derived from the water demand of the tree
derived information.
charts in Clause 4.2.12, appropriate tree height (H)

tables in Clause 4.2.13
or the Foundation Depth distance (D) of the tree(s) from the foundations

Calculator App geographical location of the site north and west of London

appropriate heave precautions.

Design by an engineer in the recommendations of this chapter When this method is used and it
accordance with Technical
site investigation results in foundation depths or other
Requirement R5 advice, when necessary, from a registered arboriculturalist
details less onerous than those
or other competent person whose qualifications are derived from this chapter, the design
acceptable to NHBC. should be submitted to NHBC prior
to work commencing on site.
Foundation depths related to the zone of influence of new tree planting

Foundation depths relating to the zone of influence of proposed tree planting should be in accordance with any of the following:
Foundation depth charts in Clause 4.2.12.
The Foundation Depth Calculator App.

Tables in Clause 4.2.13.

Minimum foundation depths outside of the zone of influence of trees can be determined from Tables 4 and 5.
Table 4: Minimum foundation depths
Volume change A) Minimum foundation depth (m) (allowing for B) Minimum foundation depth (m) (where planting
potential restricted new planting) is outside the zone of influence of trees)
High 1.50 1.0
Medium 1.25 0.9
Low 1.0 0.75
Table 5: Where foundation depths are in accordance with column A or column B in Table 4, tree planting should be restricted to:
Water demand No tree planting zone for column A in Table 4 No tree planting zone / zone of influence for
column B in Table 4
High 1.0 x mature height 1.25 x mature height
Moderate 0.5 x mature height 0.75 x mature height
Low 0.2 x mature height 0.50 x mature height
Foundation depths related to new shrub planting

Shrubs have considerable potential to cause changes in soil moisture content. The foundation design should consider shrub
planting in accordance with Table 6.
CHAPTER 4.2
Table 6: Shrub planting

Volume change potential A) Minimum foundation depth (m) B) Minimum foundation depth (m)
High 1.50 1.0
Medium 1.25 0.9
Low 1.0 0.75
The foundation design should consider shrub planting as follows:

Shrubs that have a maximum Use foundation depth from column B.
mature height of 1.8m
Climbing shrubs which require Use foundation depth from column B.
wall support and have a
maximum mature height of 5.0m
Pyracantha and cotoneaster Use foundation depth from column B and plant at least 1.0 x mature height from foundation,
whose mature height or use foundation depth from column A and plant at least 0.5 x mature height from
exceeds 1.8m foundation.
All others Use foundation depth from column B and plant at least 0.75 x mature height from
foundation, or use foundation depth from column A with no restriction on minimum distance
4.2
from foundation.
4.2.8 Also see: Chapters 4.3, 4.4 and

Design and construction of foundations in shrinkable soils Technical Requirement R5
Foundations in shrinkable soils shall be appropriately designed and constructed.
Reference should be made to Clause 4.2.10 to establish the precautions necessary to cater for potential heave.
The following will only be acceptable if they are designed by an engineer and account for all potential movement of the soil on
the foundations and substructure:
Trench fill foundations deeper than 2.5m. Pile and beam foundations.
Pier and beam foundations. Rafts.
Trench fill foundations

If trench fill foundations are deeper than 2.5m:
the instability of the trench sides can lead to serious
concrete overspill or overbreak in excavations should be

construction difficulties avoided in order to reduce the possibility of additional
the design should take account of soil desiccation and the
vertical forces being transmitted to the foundation
associated arboricultural advice compressible material should be correctly placed to avoid

additional heave precautions may be necessary to cater for
excessive heave forces being applied to the foundations
lateral and shear forces acting on large vertical areas construction joints need to be detailed to account for

of foundation increased lateral forces.
Pier and beam foundations
Pier depths not exceeding 2.5m depth may be derived from Clause 4.2.7. Pier depths greater than 2.5m require site
specific assessment.
Pile and beam foundations
When selecting and designing pile and ground beam foundations, piles should be:
designed with an adequate factor of safety to resist uplift
reinforced for the length of the member governed by the

forces on the shaft due to heave. heave design.
Sufficient anchorage should be provided below the depth of desiccated soil. Slip liners may be used to reduce uplift but the
amount of reduction is small, as friction between materials cannot be eliminated.
Bored, cast-in-place piles are well suited to counteracting heave. Most types have a straight-sided shaft, while some are
produced with a contoured shaft to increase load capacity. The design should allow for the enhanced tensile forces in these
piles.
Driven piles are less well suited to counteracting heave and are difficult to install in stiff desiccated clay without excessive noise
and vibration. The joint design of these piles should be capable of transmitting tensile heave forces.
Ground beams should be designed to account for the upward forces acting on their underside and transmitted from the
compressible material or void former prior to collapse, and in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
9
CHAPTER 4.2
Raft foundations
Raft foundations in shrinkable soils will only be acceptable where all of the following apply:
design is by an engineer in accordance with
the raft is generally rectangular in plan with a side ratio of

Technical Requirement R5 not more than 2:1
NHBC is satisfied that the raft is sufficiently stiff to resist
foundation depth is derived in accordance with Clause

differential movements 4.2.7, and is less than 2.5m.
NHBC is satisfied that the raft is founded on granular infill

placed and fully compacted in layers and in accordance
with the engineer’s specification. Where required by
NHBC, site inspections are to be undertaken by the
engineer to verify suitable compaction of the fill
4.2.9
Foundation depths for specific conditions in shrinkable soils
Foundations in shrinkable soils shall be designed to transmit loads to the ground safely and without
excessive movement. Items to be taken into account include:
4.2
a) strip and trench fill foundations in non-shrinkable soils overlying shrinkable soil
b) measurement of foundation depths
c) granular infill beneath raft foundations in shrinkable soils
d) steps in foundations.
Strip and trench fill foundations in non-shrinkable soils overlying shrinkable soil
Non shrinkable soils such as sands and gravels may overlie shrinkable soil. Foundations may be constructed on overlying
non-shrinkable soil if all the following are satisfied:
Conditions of Chapter 4.3 ‘Strip and trench fill foundations’

are met.
acceptable
Consistent soil conditions exist across each plot and this is
foundation
depth depth X
confirmed by the site investigation. depth
determined
greater
assuming
Depth of the non-shrinkable soil is greater than ¾ foundation
B
than
¾X shrinkable
soil
depth X, where X is the foundation depth determined using T equal to or greater than B
charts in Clause 4.2.12, tables in Clause 4.2.13 or the non-shrinkable soil
Foundation Depth Calculator App, assuming all the soil is shrinkable soil
shrinkable.
The thickness T of non-shrinkable soil below the foundation is

equal to, or more than, the width of the foundation B.
Proposals are submitted to, and approved by, NHBC prior to

work commencing on site.
Where any of the above are not met foundation depths should be determined as for shrinkable soil.
Measurement of foundation depths

Where ground levels are to remain unaltered, foundation Figure 1: Levels from which foundation depths are measured
depths should be measured from original ground level. where trees or hedgerows are to remain
Measurement of foundation depths where ground levels tree to remain
are reduced or increased, either in the recent past or during

construction, should be as shown in figures 1, 2 and 3.
tree to remain
vel
d le
lgroun
origina
b
b
a
Use the lower of:

a) foundation depth based on appropriate tree height (see Table 3a)
b) foundation depth based on mature height of tree.
CHAPTER 4.2
Figure 2: Levels from which foundation depths are measured Figure 3: Levels from which foundation depths are measured
where trees or hedgerows are removed where trees or hedgerows are proposed
tree to be removed proposed tree
proposed tree
tree to be removed l
d leve
l groun
le vel origina
ground
inal a b b
orig a
b
a Use the lower of:
a) minimum foundation depth (see Table 4 column B)
b) foundation depth based on mature height of tree.
Use the lower of:
a) foundation depth based on appropriate tree height (see Table 3a)
b) minimum foundation depth (see Table 4 column B).
Granular infill beneath raft foundations in shrinkable soils

Granular infill should be placed beneath raft foundations on raft foundation
4.2
ground level
shrinkable soils as shown below.
Infill should: 1.25m max. depth
be at least 50% of the foundation depth and not more

than 1.25m deep (measured from ground level determined in
accordance with 4.2.9b) 0.5m 0.5m
extend beyond the edge of the foundation by a distance equal

angle of repose of infill material
level formation
to its natural angle of repose, plus 0.5m.
fully compacted infill material
Steps in foundations
On sloping ground, foundation trenches can be gradually stepped so that the required foundation depth is reasonably uniform
below ground level.
Where foundations are to be stepped to take account of the influence of trees, hedgerows and shrubs, they should be
stepped gradually, with no step exceeding 0.5m.
4.2.10
Heave precautions Also see: Chapter 2.1 and BS 5837
Foundations, substructures and services shall be suitably designed and detailed to prevent excessive
movement due to heave. Heave precautions shall be incorporated into foundations and substructures in
accordance with the design. Items to be taken into account include:
a) potential for ground movement e) other foundation types
b) minimum void dimensions f) suspended ground floors
c) proprietary heave materials g) paths and driveways.
d) heave precautions for foundations
Where foundations and substructure may be subject to heave, they should be protected by voids, void formers or
compressible materials.
Where proprietary materials are used, the design of foundations and substructure should take into account the upward force
transmitted through the compressible material or void former prior to collapse (refer to manufacturer’s data).
This section provides guidance on heave precautions for common building elements when located within the influence of trees
which are to remain or be removed, including:
trench fill foundations
other foundation types

pier and beam foundations
paths and driveways

pile and beam foundations
new drainage.

11
CHAPTER 4.2
Potential for ground movement

After the felling or removal of trees and hedgerows on shrinkable soils, heave can occur, as the absorbed moisture causes
swelling. Heave can also occur beneath a building where:
roots are severed there are changes in ground water conditions.
water enters the ground from leaking drains and services
Minimum void dimensions

Voids should be provided to accommodate movement due to heave forces acting against foundations and suspended ground
floors in accordance with Table 7.
Table 7: Void dimensions
Volume change Void dimension against side of Void dimension under ground Void dimension under
potential foundation and ground beam beams, and suspended in-situ suspended precast concrete
concrete ground floor and timber floors(1)
High 35mm 150mm 300mm
Medium 25mm 100mm 250mm
4.2
Low 0mm 50mm 200mm

Notes
1 Under suspended floors, the void dimension is measured from the underside of beam or joist to ground level and includes 150mm ventilation allowance.
Void formers consist of materials that collapse to form a void into which the clay can swell. The void dimension is the ‘remaining
void’ after collapse. The thickness of the void former should be in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Proprietary materials to accommodate heave

Compressible material compacts as clay expands; the void dimension is the amount the material should be able to compress
to accommodate heave. The thickness of compressible material required should be established from the manufacturer’s
recommendations, but generally will be approximately twice the void dimension shown.
Each material should be assessed in accordance with Technical Requirement R3 and used in accordance with the independent
assessment and the manufacturer’s recommendations.
The correct placement of heave materials is essential to ensure the foundations and substructure are adequately protected from
heave forces.
Heave precautions for foundations

Table 8 shows where heave precautions are required for trench fill, pier and beam, and pile and beam foundation types which
are in the zone of influence of trees (see Table 3b) which are to remain or be removed.
Table 8: Position of heave precautions
Situation (see figures 4,5 & 6) Trench fill Pier and beam Pile and beam
External trench fill and pier foundations. Unless NHBC Inside faces of external All faces of pier foundations N/A
is satisfied that the soil is not desiccated compressible wall foundations deeper deeper than 1.5m, based
material should be provided to the: than 1.5m, based on the on the appropriate
appropriate tree height. tree height.
External ground beams. N/A Inside faces. Inside faces.
Unless NHBC is satisfied that the soil is not desiccated
compressible material or void formers should be
provided to the:
Internal trench fill foundations and ground beams. No No No
Compressible material required:
External and internal ground beams. N/A All All
Compressible material, void former or void should be
provided to the underside of:
Heave precautions required for proposed trees where No No No
the soil is not desiccated:
CHAPTER 4.2
Figure 4: Heave precautions for trench fill foundations up to Figure 5: Heave precautions for pier and beam foundations
2.5m deep
3D 3D
void (see Table 7) void (see Table 7)
backfill
backfill compressible material
450mm max or void former to embedment of
inside face of external anchorage bars to
ground beams be 40 bar
diameters
compressible material or designed by an
compressible material
or void former engineer
beneath ground (see Technical
vertical face beams Requirement R5)
to
foundation
compressible
material
to sides of piers
500mm 500mm
It is essential that heave material is provided to the entire

It is essential that: areas shown. Particular care should be taken to ensure that the
■ Compressible material is provided to the entire area shown, full width of the ground beam is protected.
and the foundation excavation has a vertical face.
■ Where the excavation is battered or if there is overbreak or
4.2
concrete overspill, it may be necessary to consult an engineer.
Figure 6: Heave precautions for pile and beam foundations Raft foundations constructed in accordance with
Clause 4.2.8 and Clause 4.2.9 should provide adequate
3D protection from heave.
void (see Table 7)
backfill
compressible material
or void former to
inside face of external embedment of
ground beams pile tension
reinforcement
to be 40 bar
diameters or
designed by
an engineer
(see Technical
Requirement R5)
compressible material optional rigid
or void former beneath slip liner
ground beams
pile length to
engineer's design
It is essential that heave material is provided to the entire areas shown.

Particular care should be taken to ensure that the full width of the
ground beam and the areas around the piles are protected.
Other foundation types

All foundations not covered in this chapter, but specifically designed to counteract heave, should be:
designed by an engineer taking account of this guidance
submitted to NHBC prior to commencing work on site.

Suspended ground floors

Suspended ground floors with voids in accordance with Table 7 should be used in situations where heave can occur within the
area bounded by the foundations, including where:
foundation depth, determined in accordance with this
ground floor construction is undertaken when the surface

chapter, is more than 1.5m, unless NHBC is satisfied the soils are seasonally desiccated (i.e. during summer
soil is not desiccated, or and autumn), unless NHBC is satisfied the soil is not
desiccated.
Paths and driveways

Paths and driveways should be designed and detailed to cater for the likely ground movement.
13
CHAPTER 4.2
4.2.11
New drainage Also see: Chapter 5.3
Drainage shall be in accordance with the design and allow for ground movement.
To protect against the effects of heave, drainage should be designed:
to take account of potential ground movement as shown in
to use alternative means of catering for the movement

Table 9, including where pipes and services pass through when sufficient falls cannot be provided, for example by
substructure walls or foundations deepening the excavation and laying the pipework on a
with gradients which may need to be greater than those
granular bedding of suitable thickness to reduce the extent
in Chapter 5.3 ‘Drainage below ground’ as these do not of potential movement.
account for possible ground movement
Table 9: Volume change potential

Volume change potential Potential ground movement (mm)
High 150
Medium 100
Low 50
4.2
Note
Existing land drains should be maintained or diverted.
4.2.12
Foundation depth charts
Table 10: Determination of D/H value
Determination of D/H value
Distance D (m) Tree H (m)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 0.50 0.25 0.17 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03
2 1.00 0.50 0.33 0.25 0.20 0.17 0.14 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07
3 0.75 0.50 0.38 0.30 0.25 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10
4 1.00 0.67 0.50 0.40 0.33 0.29 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.13
5 0.83 0.63 0.50 0.42 0.36 0.31 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.17
6 1.00 0.75 0.60 0.50 0.43 0.38 0.33 0.30 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.20
7 1.17 0.88 0.70 0.58 0.50 0.44 0.39 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.23
8 1.00 0.80 0.67 0.57 0.50 0.44 0.40 0.36 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.27
9 1.13 0.90 0.75 0.64 0.56 0.50 0.45 0.41 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.30
10 1.00 0.83 0.71 0.63 0.56 0.50 0.45 0.42 0.38 0.36 0.33
11 1.10 0.92 0.79 0.69 0.61 0.55 0.50 0.46 0.42 0.39 0.37
12 1.20 1.00 0.86 0.75 0.67 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.46 0.43 0.40
13 1.08 0.93 0.81 0.72 0.65 0.59 0.54 0.50 0.46 0.43
14 1.17 1.00 0.88 0.78 0.70 0.64 0.58 0.54 0.50 0.47
15 1.07 0.94 0.83 0.75 0.68 0.63 0.58 0.54 0.50
16 1.14 1.00 0.89 0.80 0.73 0.67 0.62 0.57 0.53
17 1.21 1.06 0.94 0.85 0.77 0.71 0.65 0.61 0.57
18 1.13 1.00 0.90 0.82 0.75 0.69 0.64 0.60
19 1.19 1.06 0.95 0.86 0.79 0.73 0.68 0.63
20 1.11 1.00 0.91 0.83 0.77 0.71 0.67
21 1.17 1.05 0.95 0.88 0.81 0.75 0.70
22 1.10 1.00 0.92 0.85 0.79 0.73
23 1.15 1.05 0.96 0.88 0.82 0.77
24 1.20 1.09 1.00 0.92 0.86 0.80
25 1.14 1.04 0.96 0.89 0.83
26 1.18 1.08 1.00 0.93 0.87
27 1.13 1.04 0.96 0.90
28 1.17 1.08 1.00 0.93
29 1.21 1.12 1.04 0.97
30 1.15 1.07 1.00
31 1.19 1.11 1.03
32 1.14 1.07
33 1.18 1.10
34 1.21 1.13
35 1.17
36 1.20
Where no value is given in the table, minimum foundation depths apply (i.e.1.0m, 0.9m and 0.75 m for high, medium and low
volume change potential soils respectively).
CHAPTER 4.2
Chart 1: Soils with HIGH volume change potential – Modified Plasticity Index 40% or greater
D/H
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
0 TREE WATER DEMANDS
Broad-leafed trees
High
Moderate
Low
0.5
Coniferous trees
High
Minimum depth 1.0m Moderate

Foundation depths (m)
1.0
4.2
1.5
w
Lo
ate
te
ra
der
e
od
Mo
M h
ig
h
Hig
H
2.0
2.5
Chart 2: Soils with MEDIUM volume change potential – Modified Plasticity Index between 20% and less than 40%
D/H
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Broad-leafed trees
High
Moderate
Low
0.5
Coniferous trees
Minimum depth 0.9m High
Moderate
1.0
w
Lo
1.5
e
te
rat
ra
de
de
Mo
Mo
gh
h
Hi
Hig
2.0
2.5
15
CHAPTER 4.2
Chart 3: Soils with LOW volume change potential – Modified Plasticity Index 10 to less than 20%
D/H
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Broad-leafed trees
High
Moderate
Low
0.5
Coniferous trees
Minimum depth 0.75m
High
Moderate
1.0
Low
4.2
e
at
e
rat
er
de
od
Mo
M
1.5
gh
gh
Hi
Hi
2.0
2.5
CHAPTER 4.2
4.2.13
Foundation depth tables
Table 11: HIGH shrinkage soil and HIGH water demand tree
Broad-leafed trees Coniferous trees
Foundation depth (m) Foundation depth (m)
Distance Tree height H (m) Distance Tree height H (m)
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 1
2 2 2.50 Foundations greater than 2.5m
3 Foundations greater than 2.5m 3 1.95 2.25 2.50 deep to be engineer designed
4 2.50 deep to be engineer designed 4 1.45 1.85 2.15 2.35 2.50
5 2.25 2.50 5 1.00 1.45 1.80 2.05 2.20 2.35 2.50
6 2.00 2.30 2.50 6 1.00 1.45 1.75 1.95 2.15 2.25 2.40 2.50
7 1.75 2.10 2.35 2.50 7 1.00 1.10 1.45 1.70 1.90 2.05 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50
8 1.50 1.90 2.20 2.40 2.50 8 1.00 1.15 1.45 1.65 1.85 2.00 2.15 2.25 2.35 2.40
9 1.25 1.70 2.00 2.25 2.40 2.50 9 1.00 1.20 1.45 1.65 1.80 1.95 2.10 2.20 2.25
10 1.00 1.50 1.85 2.10 2.25 2.40 2.50 10 1.00 1.20 1.45 1.65 1.80 1.90 2.05 2.15
11 1.00 1.30 1.70 1.95 2.15 2.30 2.40 2.50 11 1.00 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.75 1.90 2.00
4.2
12 1.00 1.10 1.50 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.30 2.45 2.50 12 1.00 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.75 1.85
13 1.00 1.35 1.65 1.90 2.10 2.20 2.35 2.45 2.50 13 1.00 1.05 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.70
14 1.00 1.20 1.50 1.75 1.95 2.10 2.25 2.35 2.45 2.50 14 1.00 1.10 1.30 1.45 1.60
15 1.00 1.40 1.65 1.85 2.00 2.15 2.25 2.35 2.45 2.50 15 1.00 1.10 1.30 1.45
16 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 1.90 2.05 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.45 16 1.00 1.15 1.30
17 1.00 1.10 1.40 1.65 1.80 1.95 2.10 2.20 2.30 2.40 17 1.00 1.15
18 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.70 1.90 2.00 2.15 2.25 2.30 18 1.00
19 1.00 1.15 1.40 1.60 1.80 1.95 2.05 2.15 2.25 19 1.0m minimum foundation depth
20 1.00 1.30 1.50 1.70 1.85 2.00 2.10 2.20 20
21 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.75 1.90 2.00 2.10 21
22 1.00 1.10 1.30 1.50 1.70 1.85 1.95 2.05 22
23 1.00 1.20 1.45 1.60 1.75 1.90 2.00 23
24 1.00 1.10 1.35 1.50 1.65 1.80 1.90 24
25 1.00 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.75 1.85 25
26 1.00 1.15 1.35 1.50 1.65 1.80 26
27 1.00 1.05 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.70 27
28 1.00 1.20 1.35 1.50 1.65 28
29 1.00 1.10 1.30 1.45 1.60 29
30 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.50 30
31 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.45 31
32 1.00 1.05 1.25 1.40 32
33 1.00 1.15 1.30 33
34 1.00 1.10 1.25 34
35 1.00 1.20 35
36 1.00 1.10 36
37 1.0m minimum foundation depth 1.00 1.05 37
38 1.00 38
17
CHAPTER 4.2
Table 12: HIGH Shrinkage soil and MODERATE water demand tree
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 2.20 2.25 2.25 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.35 1 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.15 2.15 2.20 2.20 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.30 2.30
2 1.95 2.05 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.20 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.30 2.30 2.30 2 1.40 1.60 1.75 1.85 1.90 2.00 2.00 2.05 2.10 2.10 2.15 2.15
3 1.70 1.85 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.10 2.15 2.15 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.25 3 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.55 1.65 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.00
4 1.50 1.65 1.80 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.10 2.10 2.15 2.15 2.15 4 1.00 1.10 1.30 1.40 1.55 1.60 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90
5 1.25 1.50 1.65 1.75 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.10 5 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75
6 1.00 1.30 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.00 2.05 6 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.35 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.60
7 1.00 1.10 1.35 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.75 1.85 1.90 1.90 1.95 2.00 7 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.25 1.35 1.40 1.50
8 1.00 1.20 1.35 1.50 1.60 1.65 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.90 8 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.35
9 1.00 1.20 1.35 1.50 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 9 1.00 1.05 1.15 1.20
10 1.00 1.10 1.25 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 10 1.00 1.00 1.10
11 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.65 1.70 1.75 11 1.00
12 1.00 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 12
13 1.00 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.60 13
4.2
14 1.00 1.10 1.25 1.35 1.40 1.50 1.55 14

15 1.00 1.15 1.25 1.35 1.40 1.50 15
16 1.00 1.05 1.20 1.25 1.35 1.40 16
17 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.35 17
18 1.00 1.15 1.20 1.30 18
19 1.00 1.05 1.15 1.25 19
20 1.00 1.10 1.20 20
21 1.0m minimum foundation depth 1.00 1.10 21 1.0m minimum foundation depth
22 1.00 1.05 22
23 1.00 23
Table 13: HIGH shrinkage soil and LOW water demand tree
Broad-leafed trees
Foundation depth (m)
Distance Tree height H (m)
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75
2 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.70 1.70 1.70
3 1.20 1.35 1.40 1.50 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.65
4 1.00 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.60 1.60
5 1.00 1.15 1.25 1.30 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.50 1.55 1.55
6 1.00 1.15 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.50
7 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.45
8 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.40
9 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35
10 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30
11 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25
12 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.20
13 1.0m minimum foundation depth 1.00 1.10 1.15
14 1.00 1.05
15 1.00
CHAPTER 4.2
Table 14: MEDIUM shrinkage soil and HIGH water demand tree
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 1 Foundations greater than 2.5m
2 Foundations greater than 2.5m 2 2.15 2.30 2.45 2.50 deep to be engineer designed
3 2.40 2.50 deep to be engineer designed 3 1.70 1.95 2.15 2.25 2.35 2.45 2.50
4 2.20 2.35 2.45 4 1.25 1.60 1.85 2.00 2.15 2.25 2.30 2.40 2.45 2.50 2.50
5 1.95 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 5 0.90 1.25 1.55 1.75 1.95 2.05 2.15 2.20 2.30 2.35 2.40 2.45
6 1.75 2.00 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.45 2.50 6 0.90 1.25 1.50 1.70 1.85 1.95 2.05 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.30
7 1.55 1.85 2.05 2.20 2.30 2.35 2.45 2.50 7 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.65 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.15 2.20
8 1.35 1.70 1.90 2.05 2.20 2.25 2.35 2.40 2.45 2.50 8 0.90 1.00 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.75 1.85 1.95 2.00 2.10
9 1.15 1.50 1.75 1.95 2.10 2.20 2.25 2.35 2.40 2.45 2.50 2.50 9 0.90 1.05 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 1.95
10 0.90 1.35 1.60 1.80 1.95 2.10 2.20 2.25 2.30 2.35 2.40 2.45 10 0.90 1.10 1.25 1.45 1.55 1.65 1.75 1.85
11 0.90 1.15 1.50 1.70 1.85 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.25 2.30 2.35 2.40 11 0.90 1.10 1.25 1.40 1.55 1.65 1.75
12 0.90 1.00 1.35 1.60 1.75 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.25 2.30 2.35 12 0.90 1.10 1.25 1.40 1.50 1.60
13 0.90 1.20 1.45 1.65 1.80 1.95 2.05 2.10 2.20 2.25 2.30 13 0.90 0.95 1.10 1.25 1.40 1.50
4.2
14 0.90 1.05 1.35 1.55 1.70 1.85 1.95 2.05 2.10 2.20 2.25 14 0.90 1.00 1.15 1.25 1.40
15 0.90 1.20 1.45 1.60 1.75 1.85 1.95 2.05 2.10 2.20 15 0.90 1.00 1.15 1.25
16 0.90 1.10 1.35 1.55 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.05 2.10 16 0.90 1.00 1.15
17 0.90 1.00 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.70 1.85 1.90 2.00 2.05 17 0.90 1.05
18 0.90 1.15 1.35 1.50 1.65 1.75 1.85 1.95 2.00 18 0.90
19 0.90 1.05 1.25 1.40 1.55 1.70 1.80 1.90 1.95 19
20 0.90 1.15 1.35 1.50 1.60 1.75 1.80 1.90 20
21 0.90 1.05 1.25 1.40 1.55 1.65 1.75 1.85 21
22 0.90 0.95 1.15 1.35 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 22
23 0.90 1.10 1.25 1.40 1.55 1.65 1.75 23
24 0.90 1.00 1.20 1.35 1.45 1.60 1.70 24
25 0.90 1.10 1.25 1.40 1.50 1.60 25
26 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.35 1.45 1.55 26
27 0.90 0.95 1.15 1.30 1.40 1.50 27
28 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.35 1.45 28
29 0.90 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.40 29
30 0.90 1.10 1.20 1.35 30
31 0.90 1.00 1.15 1.30 31
32 0.90 0.95 1.10 1.25 32
33 0.90 1.05 1.15 33
34 0.90 1.00 1.10 34
35 0.90 1.05 35
37 0.90 0.95 37
38 0.90 38
19
CHAPTER 4.2
Table 15: MEDIUM shrinkage soil and MODERATE water demand tree
Broad-leafed trees Coniferous
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 1.85 1.85 1.90 1.90 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95 1 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.80 1.85 1.85 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90
2 1.65 1.75 1.80 1.80 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 1.90 2 1.25 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.65 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.75 1.80 1.80 1.80
3 1.45 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 3 0.90 1.10 1.25 1.35 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.70 1.70
4 1.30 1.45 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.75 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 4 0.90 0.95 1.10 1.25 1.30 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.55 1.60
5 1.10 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.70 1.75 1.75 1.80 5 0.90 0.90 1.05 1.15 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50
6 0.90 1.15 1.30 1.40 1.45 1.55 1.60 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.70 1.75 6 0.90 0.95 1.10 1.15 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40
7 0.90 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.70 7 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.25 1.30
8 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.55 1.60 1.65 8 0.90 0.95 1.05 1.10 1.20
9 0.90 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 9 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.10
10 0.90 0.95 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 10 0.90 0.90 0.95
11 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 11 0.90
12 0.90 1.05 1.15 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 12
13 0.90 0.95 1.05 1.15 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 13
4.2
14 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.25 1.30 1.35 14

15 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.25 1.30 15
16 0.90 0.95 1.05 1.10 1.20 1.25 16
17 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.20 17
18 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.15 18
19 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.10 19
20 0.90 0.95 1.05 20
22 0.90 0.95 22
23 0.90 23
Table 16: MEDIUM shrinkage soil and LOW water demand tree
Broad-leafed trees
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.50 1.50
2 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.45 1.45
3 1.05 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.40
4 0.90 1.05 1.10 1.20 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.35
5 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.25 1.25 1.30 1.30 1.30
6 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.25 1.25 1.30
7 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.25
8 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.20
9 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.15
10 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.10
11 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10
12 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05
14 0.90 0.95
15 0.90
CHAPTER 4.2
Table 17: LOW shrinkage soil and HIGH water demand tree
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 2.35 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45 1 2.15 2.25 2.30 2.30 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40
2 2.15 2.25 2.30 2.30 2.35 2.35 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.45 2 1.80 1.95 2.05 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.25 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.35
3 2.00 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.30 2.30 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.35 2.40 3 1.45 1.65 1.80 1.90 1.95 2.05 2.10 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.20 2.25
4 1.80 1.95 2.05 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.25 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.35 4 1.05 1.35 1.55 1.70 1.80 1.85 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.15
5 1.65 1.80 1.95 2.00 2.10 2.15 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.30 5 0.75 1.05 1.30 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05
6 1.45 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.05 2.10 2.15 2.15 2.20 2.20 2.25 6 0.75 1.05 1.25 1.45 1.55 1.65 1.70 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95
7 1.30 1.55 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.05 2.05 2.10 2.15 2.15 2.20 7 0.75 0.80 1.05 1.25 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.65 1.75 1.80 1.85
8 1.10 1.40 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.10 2.10 2.15 8 0.75 0.85 1.05 1.20 1.35 1.45 1.55 1.60 1.70 1.75
9 0.95 1.25 1.45 1.60 1.75 1.80 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.05 2.05 2.10 9 0.75 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.35 1.45 1.50 1.60 1.65
10 0.75 1.10 1.35 1.50 1.65 1.75 1.80 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.00 2.05 10 0.75 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.55
11 0.75 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.55 1.65 1.75 1.80 1.90 1.95 1.95 2.00 11 0.75 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.45
12 0.75 0.85 1.10 1.30 1.45 1.60 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 12 0.75 0.95 1.05 1.15 1.25 1.35
13 0.75 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 13 0.75 0.80 0.95 1.05 1.15 1.25
4.2
14 0.75 0.90 1.10 1.30 1.45 1.55 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 14 0.75 0.80 0.95 1.05 1.15
15 0.75 1.00 1.20 1.35 1.45 1.55 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 15 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.05
16 0.75 0.90 1.10 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75 16 0.75 0.85 0.95
17 0.75 0.80 1.05 1.20 1.35 1.45 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.75 17 0.75 0.85
18 0.75 0.95 1.10 1.25 1.35 1.45 1.55 1.60 1.70 18 0.75
19 0.75 0.85 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.55 1.65 19
20 0.75 0.95 1.10 1.25 1.35 1.45 1.50 1.60 20
21 0.75 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.45 1.55 21
22 0.75 0.80 1.00 1.10 1.25 1.35 1.40 1.50 22
23 0.75 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.45 23
24 0.75 0.85 1.00 1.10 1.25 1.30 1.40 24
25 0.75 0.95 1.05 1.15 1.25 1.35 25
26 0.75 0.85 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 26
27 0.75 0.80 0.95 1.05 1.15 1.25 27
28 0.75 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 28
29 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.05 1.15 29
30 0.75 0.90 1.00 1.10 30
31 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.05 31
32 0.75 0.80 0.90 1.05 32
33 0.75 0.85 1.00 33
34 0.75 0.80 0.95 34
35 0.75 0.90 35
36 0.75 0.85 36
38 0.75 38
21
CHAPTER 4.2
Table 18: LOW shrinkage soil and MODERATE water demand tree
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 1.50 1.50 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.60 1.60 1.60 1 1.30 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.45 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.55 1.55 1.55
2 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.45 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.55 2 1.00 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.45 1.45
3 1.20 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 3 0.75 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.40
4 1.05 1.15 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 4 0.75 0.80 0.95 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.25 1.25 1.30
5 0.90 1.05 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.45 5 0.75 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.20
6 0.75 0.95 1.05 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.35 1.40 1.40 6 0.75 0.80 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15
7 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.05 1.10 1.20 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.30 1.35 1.35 7 0.75 0.75 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05
8 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.25 1.30 1.30 8 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.95 0.95
9 0.75 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.25 1.30 9 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90
10 0.75 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.25 10 0.75 0.75 0.80
11 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.15 1.20 11 0.75
12 0.75 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.15 12
13 0.75 0.80 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 13
4.2
14 0.75 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 14

15 0.75 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 15
16 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 16
17 0.75 0.80 0.90 0.95 1.00 17
18 0.75 0.85 0.90 0.95 18
19 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 19
20 0.75 0.80 0.85 20
22 0.75 0.80 22
23 0.75 23
Table 19: LOW shrinkage soil and LOW water demand tree
Broad-leafed trees
D (m) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
1 1.10 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20
2 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
3 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.15
4 0.75 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.10 1.10 1.10
5 0.75 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
6 0.75 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05
7 0.75 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
8 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 1.00
9 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95
10 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90
11 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.90
12 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.85
14 0.75 0.80
15 0.75
CHAPTER 4.2
4.2.14
Example
The following is an example of how to determine foundation depths using the information in this chapter.
The process may be repeated to allow the foundation to be stepped as its distance from the tree increases.
Step 1
Determine the volume change potential of the soil. Ensure the site investigation includes representative sampling and testing.
Site at Oxford, building near a Lombardy poplar (to be retained) and a sycamore (to be removed).
From laboratory tests:
Plasticity Index, Ip = 36%
Test results also report that 100% of particles are smaller than 425µm.
Therefore:
Modified Plasticity Index, I’p = 36 x100 = 36%
100
4.2
Volume change potential = medium
(In the absence of tests, assume high volume change potential.)
This example is typical of Oxford clay. More than 35% of the particles are smaller than 60µm and therefore the soil is shrinkable.
100% of the particles are smaller than 425µm and therefore I’p is the same as the Ip.
A typical boulder clay also has more than 35% of particles smaller than 60µm and is therefore also shrinkable. However, it may
have only 80% of its particles smaller than 425µm, in which case, the I’p is 80% of the Ip.
A typical clayey sand may have less than 30% of its particles smaller than 60µm, in which case, the soil would be non-shrinkable.
Step 2
Establish the species, mature height and water demand of all trees and hedgerows within the influencing radii.
Lombardy poplar Sycamore
Mature height = 25m Mature height = 22m
Water demand = high Water demand = moderate
Step 3
Plot the trees and hedgerows relative to the foundations and
draw their zones of influence to determine which trees will
zone of influence
affect the foundation design. Use a scaled plan. of Lombardy poplar
1.25 x 25 = 31.25m
Lombardy poplar
mature height 25m 10m
sycamore
mature 8m
height 22m
zone of influence
of sycamore
0.75 x 22 = 16.5m
23
CHAPTER 4.2
Step 4
Establish the appropriate tree height H to use.
Always use the mature height for remaining and proposed trees and hedgerows. The appropriate height to use for removed trees
and hedgerows depends on the actual height when they are removed.
Tree to remain. Therefore: Tree to be removed
H = mature height Mature height = 22m
= 25m Actual height = 15m
Actual height greater than 50% mature height. Therefore:
H = mature height
= 22m
Step 5
Measure the distance D from the centre of the trees or hedgerows to the face of the foundation.
Distance D = 10m from foundation Distance D = 8m from foundation
4.2
Step 6
Either:
use the NHBC Foundation Depth Calculator App, or
select step 6T if using tables in Clause 4.2.13.

select steps 6C (a) and (b) if using charts in Clause 4.2.12

to derive depths, or
Step 6C (a)
Calculate D/H value
Distance D from face of foundation (step 5) divided by the appropriate tree height H (Step 4).
Alternatively D/H can be obtained from Clause 4.2.12.
D = 10 = D/H = 0.4 D = 8 = D/H = 0.36
H = 25 H = 22
Step 6C (b)
Determine foundation depth using the charts in Clause 4.2.12 as follows:
Volume change potential Chart number
High 1
Medium 2
Low 3

In this example, the volume change potential is medium, then In this example, the volume change potential is medium, then
from Chart 2 for broad-leafed high water demand trees at from Chart 2 for broad-leafed moderate water demand trees at
D = 0.4 D = 0.36
H H
Foundation depth = 2.33m Foundation depth = 1.50m
The Lombardy poplar is the tree requiring the greater depth (2.33m).
CHAPTER 4.2
Step 6T
Determine foundation depth using the tables in 4.2.13 as follows:
Volume change potential Tree water demand Table number
High High 11
Moderate 12
Low 13
Medium High 14
Moderate 15
Low 16
Low High 17
Moderate 18
Low 19
Step 7
Adjust the depth according to the climatic zone.
4.2
A reduction may be made for distance north and west of London, but the final depth should not be less than the minimum given
in each chart and table.
Oxford is between 50 and 100 miles NW of London. From 4.2.5, a reduction of 0.05m is permitted.
Final foundation depth = 2.33 – 0.05 = 2.28m
4.2.15
Further information

BRE Digests 40, 241 and 242 ‘Low rise buildings on
Glasgow geological survey maps obtainable from British
shrinkable clay soils’, parts 1, 2 and 3 Geological Survey, Nicker Hill, Keyworth,

BRE Digest 298 ‘The influence of trees on house Nottingham NG12 5GG; Tel: 0115 936 3100
foundations in clay soils’
Tree root damage to buildings Vol.1 Causes, Diagnosis

BRE Digest 412 ‘Desiccation in clay soils’ and Remedy, Vol. 2 Patterns of Soil Drying in Proximity to

BS 1377 ‘Methods of test for soils for civil Trees on Clay Soils by P G Biddle, Willowmead Publishing,
engineering purposes’ Wantage OX12 9JA

BS 5930 ‘Code of practice for ground investigations’
Institution of Civil Engineers

Tree Recognition – A Pocket Manual by Ian Richardson 1-7 Great George Street, London SW1P 3AA;
and Rowena Gale, Richardson’s Botanical Identifications, Tel: 020 7222 7722; www.ice.org.uk
49/51 Whiteknights Road, Reading, Berks RG6 7BB
Institution of Structural Engineers

Field Guide to the Trees of Britain and Northern Europe 47-58 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PS;
by Alan Mitchell, Harper Collins Tel: 020 7235 4535
Acknowledgements: NHBC gratefully acknowledges the help given by authoritative organisations and individuals in the
preparation of this chapter, particularly: Building Research Establishment; Dr P G Biddle, arboricultural consultant.
Strip and trench fill foundations
CHAPTER 4.3
This chapter gives guidance on meeting
the Technical Requirements for strip and
trench fill foundations.
4.3.1 Compliance 01
4.3.3 Ground conditions 01
4.3.4 Hazardous ground 02
4.3.5 Setting out 02
4.3.6 Services and drainage 03
4.3.7 Safe transmission of loads 03
4.3.8 Sloping ground and stepped foundations 05
4.3.9 Excavations 05
4.3.10 Reinforcement 06
4.3.11 Concrete 06
4.3.12 Movement joints 06
4.3.13 Construction joints 06
1
Strip and trench fill foundations 2019
CHAPTER 4.3
4.3.1
Strip and trench fill foundations shall comply with the Technical Requirements and provide adequate
support to all load-bearing elements.
Strip and trench fill foundations that comply with the guidance in this chapter will generally be acceptable.
Foundations should be designed by an engineer in accordance with Technical Requirement R5 where:
buildings exceed three storeys in height
trench fill foundations are deeper than 2.5m

supporting/retaining walls form habitable rooms
they will be deeper than those of an adjoining construction.

below ground
Elements of the building requiring foundations include:
external walls
chimney breasts

separating (party) walls
piers.

internal load-bearing walls

In Scotland, a sleeper wall is defined as a load-bearing element and therefore should be provided with a suitable foundation.
4.3
In England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, sleeper walls should be provided with suitable foundations where the
oversite concrete is:
cast on shrinkable clay soils where heave could take place
less than 100mm thick.

cast on infill deeper than 600mm

4.3.2
Provision of information Also see: Chapter 4.1
information and be distributed to all appropriate personnel.
Clear and fully detailed drawings should be available on site to enable work to be carried out in accordance with the design.
Design and specification information should be issued to site supervisors, relevant specialist subcontractors and/or suppliers.
All necessary dimensions and levels should be indicated and relate to at least one benchmark and reference points on the site.
Information on ground conditions, the site investigation and the foundation design may be requested by NHBC, including sites
which may not be classified as hazardous.
Both designers and site operatives need to be aware of the ground conditions and any features requiring special attention, such
as existing sewers or other services, the water table and the presence of any hazardous substances, including sulfates.
Where toxic materials or those likely to present a health hazard are found, all available information should be supplied to NHBC,
together with proposals for remediation.
Full details of junctions, steps, movement joints and any critical sequences of construction should be provided.
4.3.3
Ground conditions Also see: Chapters 3.2, 4.1, 4.2 and 5.2
Strip and trench fill foundations shall be adequate, of a suitable depth and taken to a suitable bearing
stratum. Issues to be taken into account include:
a) the home design and layout c) frost susceptible soils and cold weather construction
b) ground conditions d) shrinkable and volume change soils.
The home design and layout

Foundation design should take account of site conditions, shape, size and construction of the homes. Foundations for terraced
homes may require special precautions to prevent damage from differential settlement, while stepped foundations or suspended
floors may be required for sloping sites.
The depth of foundations should provide a clean, firm and adequate bearing for the design loads.
Ground conditions
All relevant information about the history of the site, plus the nature and load-bearing capacity of the ground, should be available
before the foundations are designed. Information may be available from:
NHBC
gas, water and electricity companies

local authorities
aerial photographs, Ordnance Survey maps and geological

maps and surveys.
Strip and trench fill foundations 2019 2
CHAPTER 4.3
Site assessment surveys may require supplementary investigations involving trial pits and boreholes.
Frost susceptible soils and cold weather construction

In frost susceptible soils, e.g. chalk, the depth to the underside of finished ground level
the foundation should be at least 450mm below finished ground
level, to avoid damage from frost action.
Additionally, when construction is undertaken during cold
450mm min.
weather the foundation should either be at least 450mm below
finished ground level, or alternatively, precautions should be
taken to prevent freezing of the ground.
Where the finished ground level is to be above the existing
ground level and cold conditions are expected, the foundation
depth should be taken from the existing, not finished, ground
level.
Shrinkable and volume change soil
4.3
The design should specify the minimum foundation depth.
Table 1: Minimum foundation depths in shrinkable soil
Modified Plasticity Index Volume change potential Minimum depth (m)
40% and greater High 1.0
20% to less than 40% Medium 0.9
10% to less than 20% Low 0.75
Shrinkable soils are classified as containing more than 35% fine particles (clay and silt) and have a Modified Plasticity Index of
10% or greater.
These minimum depths may only be used where any existing or proposed trees or shrubs are outside the zone of tree influence.
Heave is possible in shrinkable soil where trees have been, or are being, removed.
4.3.4
Hazardous ground Also see: Chapters 2.1 and 4.2
Strip and trench fill foundations on hazardous ground shall be designed by an engineer, and notice given to
NHBC before work commences.
Where hazardous ground has been identified, NHBC must be notified eight weeks before work starts. Hazardous ground is
defined in Chapter 4.1 ‘Land quality – managing ground conditions’.
4.3.5
Setting out
Strip and trench fill foundations shall be set out to take account of the design details.
The accuracy of setting out should be checked by control
measurements of trenches, including their location relative boundary
to site boundaries and adjacent buildings. Levels should be

checked against accepted benchmarks. distance from
boundary
For excavations, check: distance from

boundary
trench lengths

trench widths
diagonals
length of diagonals between external corners.

trench
length
Walls should be located centrally on the foundation,
unless specifically designed otherwise.
Any discrepancy in dimensions should be reported promptly to
the designer. Resulting variations should be distributed to all trench width
appropriate persons, including NHBC.
3
CHAPTER 4.3
4.3.6
Services and drainage Also see: Chapters 5.1 and 5.3
All strip and trench fill foundations shall be installed to:
a) adequately protect existing services and ground water drainage
b) make allowance for drainage and other services.
Adequately protect existing services and ground water drainage

Any existing services, such as cables, water pipes or gas
mains, may need to be supported and protected. Services
should not be rigidly encased in the foundations, and drains
land drains
which are redundant should be cut open and filled or removed. diversion diverted to
suitable
Precautions should be taken to accommodate the effects of outfall
settlement where drains run under, or near to, a building.
Provision should be made to divert or protect any existing
ground water drains affected by excavation work.
4.3
Make allowance for drainage and other services

Where services are to pass through or above foundations, provision should be made for suitable ducts or lintels to enable
later installation.
Strip foundations
Services should not pass through strip foundations but through the masonry above. Adequate lintels should be provided
in the masonry.
Trench fill
The load-bearing capability of foundations should not be affected where services pass through. Services should be either
sleeved or pass through a suitably strengthened opening in the foundation. This is to ensure that differential movement will not
damage services.
For drainage, it is important to leave sufficient space for movement to ensure that the drain is capable of maintaining line
and gradient.
flexible material flexible joint masked opening with

around pipe lintel granular backfill around pipe 50mm gap all around
4.3.7
Safe transmission of loads Also see: BS 8103-1
Strip and trench fill foundations shall transmit loads to the ground safely and without excessive settlement,
and take into account:
a) dead and imposed loads c) stability of any adjoining building.
b) foundation width and thickness
Dead and imposed loads

Dead and imposed loads should be calculated in accordance with:
BS EN 1991-1-1 UK National Annex to Eurocode 1. ‘Actions on structures. General actions. Densities, self-weight,
imposed loads for buildings’.
BS EN 1991-1-3 UK National Annex to Eurocode 1. ‘Actions on structures. General actions. Snow loads’.
BS EN 1991-1-4 UK National Annex to Eurocode 1. ‘Actions on structures. General actions. Wind actions’.
BS 648 ‘Schedule of weights of building materials’.
CHAPTER 4.3
All foundations should be:

continuous throughout the building, including integral
symmetrical beneath load-bearing elements

garages, porches, conservatories, bay windows, etc. (i.e. walls should be located centrally on foundations).
Foundation width and thickness
The width of the foundation should:
be of sufficient width throughout to avoid overstressing
depend on the load-bearing capacity of the subsoil and the

the ground, especially where the foundation is required to loads from the building
support piers or columns not be less than the wall thickness, plus at least

50mm each side.
The width of strip foundations should account for ground conditions and be in accordance with the following table:
Table 2: Acceptable foundation widths

Type of Condition of ground Field test applicable Total load of load-bearing walling not
ground more than (kN/linear metre)
(including
20 30 40 50 60 70
engineered
4.3
fill) Minimum width of strip foundation (mm)
Rock Not inferior to Requires at least a pneumatic or other Equal to the width of the wall plus 50mm
sandstone, limestone mechanically operated pick for excavation. each side.
or firm chalk
Gravel Medium dense Requires pick for excavation. 250 300 400 500 600 650
Sand Wooden peg 50mm square in cross-section
is hard to drive beyond 150mm.
Clay Stiff Can be indented slightly by thumb. 250 300 400 500 600 650
Sandy clay
Clay Firm Thumb makes impression easily. 300 350 450 600 750 850
Sandy clay
Sand Loose Can be excavated with a spade. 400 600 Does not fall within the
Silty sand Wooden peg 50mm square in cross-section provisions of this guidance
Clayey sand can be easily driven. where the total load
exceeds 30 kN/linear m.
Silt Soft Finger can be pushed in up to 10mm. 450 650
Clay
Sandy clay
Clay or silt
Silt Very soft Finger can be easily pushed in Refer to specialist advice.
Clay up to 25mm.
Sandy clay
Clay or silt
P
The thickness (T) of the foundation should be:
equal to projection (P) or 150mm (whichever is greater)

150mm to 500mm for strip foundation

500mm minimum for trench fill foundations.

Stability of any adjoining building

Where foundations are taken deeper than an adjoining building, excavation and construction will usually need to be carefully
supervised by the design engineer, to check the standard of workmanship. Where necessary, allowance should be made in the
design for differential movement.
5
CHAPTER 4.3
4.3.8
Sloping ground and stepped foundations
Strip and trench fill foundations shall be taken to a suitable bearing level when building on sloping ground,
and steps shall be suitably formed.
Sloping ground may require stepped foundations.
Where foundations are stepped, the height of the step S T
should not exceed the thickness of the foundation,
unless it forms part of a foundation designed by an engineer
in accordance with Technical Requirement R5.
overlap
Table 3: Foundation overlap

Strip foundations Trench fill foundations
The overlap should be not less than: 2 x S, or
2 x S, or

4.3
T (maximum 500mm), or
One metre, whichever is largest.

300mm, whichever is largest.

4.3.9
Excavations Also see: Chapter 4.2
Excavations for strip and trench fill foundations shall:
a) take account of the design dimensions
b) take account of localised effects
c) be compact, reasonably dry, even and correctly shaped.
Design dimensions
Inaccuracy may prevent walls and piers from being located centrally and therefore result in eccentric loading of foundations and
possible foundation failure.
Excess excavation should be avoided. Accurate trench digging is particularly important where the width of the foundation is only
slightly wider than the wall to be supported.
Acceptance from the foundation designer is required where the foundation design is modified.
Localised effects
At soft spots, excavations should be deepened to a sound bottom or the concrete should be reinforced. Hard spots should
be removed.
Where roots are visible at the bottom or sides of trenches, especially in clay soils, excavations may need to be taken deeper,
or special precautions determined by an engineer in accordance with Technical Requirement R5.
Compact, reasonably dry, even and correctly shaped

Unless otherwise designed by an engineer in accordance with vertical sides and steps horizontal bottom
Technical Requirement R5:

trench bottoms should be horizontal, with all loose

material removed
trench sides and steps should be, as near as

possible, vertical.
Trench bottoms affected by rain water, ground water or drying
should be rebottomed to form a sound surface.
CHAPTER 4.3
4.3.10
Reinforcement Also see: Chapter 3.1
Reinforcement for strip and trench fill foundations shall ensure the safe transfer of loads and be suitable
for localised ground conditions.
Reinforcement should be:
appropriately sized

placed correctly

clean and free from loose rust

secured at laps and crossings

supported to ensure that they are 75mm above the base of

the foundation or as indicated in the design.
If in doubt about any soft spots, the designer’s advice should 75mm min. cover
be taken before placing the concrete.

75mm side cover
4.3.11
Concrete Also see: Chapters 3.1 and 3.2
4.3
Concrete for foundations shall be:
a) of a mix which is suitable for the intended use
b) durable against chemical or frost action
c) correctly mixed, placed and cured.
Concreting should be carried out, as far as possible, in one
operation, taking account of weather conditions and available
daylight. Concrete should be placed as soon as possible after
the excavation has been checked.
For trench fill foundations, it is particularly important to check
that the finished level is correct and horizontal, as it is difficult
to adjust for discrepancies in the small number of brick
courses between the foundation and the DPC.
pegs used to ensure correct levels
4.3.12
Movement joints
Strip and trench fill foundations shall have movement joints suitable for their intended purpose.
Where movement joints are specified, they should be continuous with those in the superstructure.
4.3.13
Construction joints
Construction joints in strip and trench fill foundations shall be suitably formed.
Where construction joints are unavoidable:
they should not be positioned near a return in the
all shuttering should be removed before work continues

foundation beyond the construction joint.
Construction joints for strip and trench fill foundations may be formed by one of the methods shown below:
joint with expanded metal lath
joint using reinforcement

Raft, pile, pier and
beam foundations
CHAPTER 4.4
Technical Requirements for raft, pile, pier
and beam foundations.
4.4.1 Compliance 01
4.4.3 Site conditions 01
4.4.4 Hazardous ground 02
4.4.5 Services and drainage 02
4.4.6 Safe transmission of loads 03
4.4.7 Construction 03
4.4.8 Engineer checks 05
4.4.9 Compressible materials 05
4.4.10 Reinforcement 05
4.4.11 Concrete 05
4.4.12 Movement joints 05
4.4.13 Resistance to moisture 06
1
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations 2019
CHAPTER 4.4
4.4.1
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall comply with the Technical Requirements and provide adequate
support to load-bearing elements.
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations that comply with the guidance in this chapter will generally be acceptable.
Relevant Standards and codes of practice include:
BS EN 1991 ‘Actions on structures’.
BS EN 1992 ‘Design of concrete structures’.
BS EN 1997-1 ‘Geotechnical design. General rules’.
BS 10175 ‘Investigation of potentially contaminated sites. Code of practice’.
Elements of the building requiring foundations include:

external walls
piers

separating (party) walls
sleeper walls

internal load-bearing walls
internal masonry walls.

4.4
chimney breasts

4.4.2
Provision of information
information and be distributed to all appropriate personnel.
All dimensions and levels should be indicated and relate to at least one benchmark and reference points on site. Design and
specification information should be issued to site supervisors, relevant specialist subcontractors and/or suppliers, and include the
following information:
Dimensions, type and depth of foundations.
Movement and construction joints.

Detailing of ducts.
Location of services.

Junctions.
Critical sequences of construction.

Steps.

Both designers and site operatives need to be aware of:
ground conditions
water table levels

any features requiring special attention, such as existing
the presence of any hazardous substances

sewers or other services including sulfates.
4.4.3
Site conditions Also see: Chapters 5.2 and 4.1
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall be designed to take account of site conditions. Issues to be
taken into account include:
a) the results of the site and ground appraisal d) frost susceptible soils
b) dwelling design, layout and site levels e) potential for differential settlement.
c) trees and hedges
Site and ground appraisal

All information relating to the site and its ground conditions which is necessary for full and proper foundation design should
be obtained.
Building over changes in ground characteristics should be avoided.
Dwelling design, layout and site levels

Foundation design should take account of site layout, shape, size and construction of the dwelling.
Stepped foundations and suspended floors may be required for sloping sites.
Trees and hedges

Where the soil is shrinkable and nearby trees and hedges are existing, proposed or have been recently removed,
foundations should be designed as shown in Chapter 4.2 ‘Building near trees’.
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations 2019 2
CHAPTER 4.4
Frost susceptible soils

To avoid damage from frost action, the depth to the underside of the foundation in frost susceptible ground should be at least
450mm below finished ground level.
Differential settlement
Foundations should be designed to avoid any local stress points or any differential settlement.
Foundations for terraced homes, or those adjoining an existing building, may require special precautions to prevent damage
from differential settlement. Foundations for attached bays, porches, garages, conservatories and other structures should be a
continuation of those for the main home, unless the design indicates an alternative which takes account of differential movement.
4.4.4
Hazardous ground Also see: Chapters 3.1, 4.1, 4.2 and BRE Special Digest 1
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall take account of ground conditions and hazards. Where
hazardous ground has been identified, notice shall be given to NHBC before work commences.
Where there is hazardous ground, the design of foundations must be carried out by an engineer in accordance with
Technical Requirement R5.
4.4
Where hazardous ground has been identified, NHBC should be notified in writing at least eight weeks before work on site begins,
in accordance with NHBC Rules.
Where toxic materials, or those likely to present a health hazard are found, all available information should be supplied to NHBC,
together with proposals for remediation.
Sulfate and acids
Sulfates and other chemicals can cause expansion and disruption of concrete. High acidity, for example in peat, or permeable
soil with acidic ground water can cause damage to concrete. Where sulfates or high acidity in ground or ground water are
present, reference should be made to Chapter 3.1 ‘Concrete and its reinforcement’ for guidance concerning acceptable
concrete mixes.
Where concrete is at risk from chemical attack from the ground, or where the ground water is highly mobile, the level of sulfate
and other chemicals should be determined in terms of the ACEC class (aggressive chemical environment for concrete class),
in accordance with BRE Special Digest 1.
4.4.5
Services and drainage Also see: Chapters 5.1, 5.3 and 8.1
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall take account of new and existing services. Issues to be taken
into account include:
a) provision for new services
b) adequate protection of existing services and drainage.
Provision for new services

Where services are to pass through, above or under foundations, openings should be provided using suitable ducts,
sleeves or lintels that:
are detailed so as not to impair structural stability
have sufficient space to maintain line and gradient of

do not affect the ability of the foundation to carry loads
drainage where movement occurs.
make suitable provision to allow for movement

Existing services and drainage
Existing services or drains should:
be supported and protected
not be rigidly encased in concrete, masonry, etc.

be bridged, to prevent any load carrying

Land drains should be diverted to a suitable outfall; other drains should be diverted or bridged.
3
CHAPTER 4.4
4.4.6
Safe transmission of loads Also see: Chapter 5.1
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall be designed to transmit loads from the structure to the
ground safely, without excessive settlement.
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations should safely transmit loads. The following issues should be taken into account:
adequate stiffness to ensure that differential movement
specification of concrete and cover to reinforcement.
does not adversely affect the supported structure
nature and bearing capacity of the fill material to be placed
under the foundation
Raft and semi-raft foundations:

Raft and semi-raft foundations should be designed:
to prevent the erosion of ground beneath the raft
to limit the risk of ducts becoming flooded.

(where required) to accommodate warm air ducts,

service ducts or services without any adverse effect
upon the performance of the foundation
4.4
Fill for raft foundations should be in accordance with Chapter 5.1 ‘Substructure and ground-bearing floors’.
Semi-raft foundations on made ground:
The following notes are to be used as a guide for engineers designing raft foundations, but are by no means exhaustive.
Special consideration will be required for certain sites.
Raft foundations are to be designed by a chartered civil or Beams are to use properly formed reinforcement in
structural engineer taking account of ground conditions and accordance with BS EN 1992-1-1.
the results of the site appraisal and ground assessment. Where mesh is used in beams, it should be delivered to
Sufficient internal beams are to be provided to stiffen the the site pre-bent.
slab adequately. All beams should be cast on a minimum of 50mm
The area between downstand beams should not be greater concrete blinding.
than 35m2. Minimum cover to reinforcement should be 40mm.
The ratio of adjacent sides on plan should not exceed 2:1. Floor slabs should be a minimum 150mm thick, with
The minimum depth of perimeter and party wall beams nominal top face reinforcement as a minimum and anti-
is to be 450mm. On larger homes, some internal beams crack reinforcement in the bottom face, where appropriate.
should be of the same depth as the perimeter beams. Stools or similar should be used to support floor slab mesh
Perimeter and internal beams should be sufficiently wide during casting.
at their base to carry their total loading at the allowable Corners and junctions to beams should be adequately tied
bearing pressure for the site. using similar reinforcement to the beams.
Beams are to be designed to span 3m simply supported A minimum cavity drain of 225mm below the DPC is to
and cantilever 1.5m. be maintained.
Piled foundations:
The design of all piled foundations should specify precautions for cohesive soils where volume changes can occur.
The bearing capacity and integrity of piles should be confirmed by testing, when required.
4.4.7
Construction Also see: Chapter 4.2
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall be constructed in accordance with the design. Issues to be
taken into account include:
a) setting out and excavations
b) localised effects and trench bottoms
c) installation of piles, piers and ground beams
d) load capacity verification of piles.
Setting out and excavations

The accuracy of setting out should be checked by control measurements of trenches, including their location relative to site
boundaries and adjacent buildings. Levels should be checked against benchmarks, where appropriate. For excavations, check:
trench lengths
length of diagonals between external corners.

trench widths

CHAPTER 4.4
In addition, for piled, pier and beam foundations, check:

spacing
positions in relation to the proposed superstructure.

alignment

Walls should be located centrally on the foundation, unless specifically designed otherwise. Inaccuracy may prevent walls and
piers being located centrally, resulting in eccentric loading and possible foundation failure.
Discrepancies to the design of the foundations or variations in the ground conditions should be reported formally to the engineer.
Variations in design or ground conditions should be recorded and distributed to NHBC and others concerned with sitework.
Foundation excavations should:
be kept free from water
not be excessive.

boundary boundary
distance from distance from

boundary boundary
4.4
distance from distance from
boundary boundary
diagonals diagonals
trench alignment
length
trench
width alignment
Localised effects and trench bottoms

Trench bottoms affected by rain water, ground water or drying should be rebottomed to form a sound surface.
Table 1: Localised effects
Situation Action
Differences in bearing capacity Consult the engineer.
(e.g. from localised changes in strata)
Soft spots Excavations should be deepened locally to a sound bottom, or the concrete should
be reinforced.
Hard spots Should be removed.
Visible roots, especially in clay soils Consult the engineer and modify the design depth.
Installation of piles, piers and ground beams

Piles are to be installed by an appropriate specialist and under the supervision of an engineer.
Piles are to be vertical, unless designed otherwise.
Where piles are more than 75mm out of position, or out of alignment by more than 1:75, the engineer should reconsider the
adequacy of the foundation design.
Where piles are misaligned by more than 150mm in any direction, or more than 5° from their specified rake, they should be
replaced, unless otherwise recommended by the engineer. Alternatively, additional piles should be provided in accordance with
the design modifications provided by the engineer.
Care should be taken to ensure that the bond of beams to piers and piles is in accordance with the design and is adequate.
Load capacity verification of piles

Test loading of piles should be undertaken when required. The builder is to obtain written confirmation that the piles are suitable
for their design load.
5
CHAPTER 4.4
4.4.8
Engineer checks
Engineer-designed foundations shall be inspected by the engineer during construction.
The engineer should undertake site visits to ensure that the design of the foundation is suitable for the actual ground
conditions encountered, and that the construction is in accordance with the design.
4.4.9
Compressible materials Also see: Chapter 4.2
Compressible materials shall be capable of absorbing potential heave forces.
Materials used to accommodate heave should be assessed in accordance with Technical Requirement R3 and used in
accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and independent assessment when applicable.
4.4.10
Reinforcement
Reinforcement of raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall be in accordance with the design, sufficient to
ensure the safe transfer of loads and be suitable for localised ground conditions.
4.4
Reinforcement should be:

appropriately sized
secured at laps and crossings

placed correctly
properly supported to ensure that the cover indicated in the

clean and free from loose rust
design is maintained.
Reinforcement may be necessary, for example at construction joints or over small localised soft spots or changes in bearing
strata.
4.4.11
Concrete
Concrete for raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall be:
a) of
a suitable mix design to achieve the required strength and resistance to chemical and frost action
b) correctly mixed, placed and cured.
Mixing, placing, testing and curing of concrete should be carried out as indicated in Chapter 3.1 ‘Concrete and its reinforcement’
and when work is carried out in cold weather, Chapter 3.2 ‘Cold weather working’.
Suitable mix
Concrete should be of a mix which:
will achieve the required strength and not impair the
is sufficiently resistant to chemical and frost action.

performance of the foundation
Correctly mixed, placed and cured

Before concrete is placed, excavations and reinforcement may need to be approved by the engineer or their representative and,
in England and Wales, foundations should be approved by the person responsible for building control inspections.
Concreting should:
be carried out in one operation (as far as possible)
be placed as soon as possible after the excavation or after

take account of weather conditions and available daylight
the reinforcement has been checked
be placed in even, compact and reasonably dry trenches.

4.4.12
Movement joints
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall have movement joints suitable for their intended purpose, and
be formed using appropriate materials.
Movement joints should be located so as to limit the risk of damage caused by movement. The design of movement joints and
choice of sealing materials should consider:
anticipated movement
joint depth

movement capability of seal
surface preparation

designed joint width
backing medium

actual joint width
projected life span of the joint.

CHAPTER 4.4
4.4.13
Resistance to moisture Also see: Chapters 5.1, 5.2 and 5.4
Raft, pile, pier and beam foundations shall prevent the passage of moisture to the inside of the home and,
where necessary, include a drained cavity and damp proof membranes.
Cavity walls should drain below the DPC and should:
prevent water crossing from the outside to the inside
have a minimum 225mm clear cavity below the DPC

prevent the flooding of cavities above the DPC
where strip, trenchfill or ground beams are used, or have a
drain below the DPC
minimum 150mm clear cavity below the DPC where other
types of foundations are used, provided that weep holes
and other necessary measures are taken to ensure that
the cavity can drain freely.
DPC cavity trays are not an acceptable waterproofing to the edges of specialised foundations, such as rafts and ground beams.
DPC
225mm DPC
4.4
min. 150mm min.
weep hole
above
cavity tray
ground beam raft foundation

Vibratory ground
improvement techniques
CHAPTER 4.5
Technical Requirements and recommendations
for vibratory ground improvement techniques.
4.5.1 Compliance 01
4.5.2 Hazardous sites and ground hazards 01
4.5.3 Desk study and site investigation 01
4.5.4 Confirmation of suitability for treatment 02
4.5.5 Suitability of ground conditions 02
4.5.6 Compatibility of the ground,
design and treatment 05
4.5.7 Acceptable methods 06
4.5.8 Materials for use as fill 07
4.5.9 Granular material 08
4.5.10 Sitework 08
4.5.11 Adjacent excavations 09
4.5.12 Verification of completed treatment 09
1
Vibratory ground improvement techniques 2019
CHAPTER 4.5
Introduction
The vibratory process is generally applied to weak natural soils and filled ground. The purpose is to improve the
load-bearing capacity, reduce settlement and provide an adequate bearing stratum for the foundation supporting
the home.
4.5.1
Vibratory ground improvement techniques shall comply with the Technical Requirements and be designed
by an engineer in accordance with established standards and codes of practice.
Vibratory ground improvement techniques that comply with the guidance in this chapter, and that are in accordance with the
relevant British Standards, building regulations and statutory requirements, will generally be acceptable.
Design of vibratory ground improvement, including foundations, should be carried out by an engineer experienced in ground
improvement techniques in accordance with Technical Requirement R5. In this chapter, the term ‘engineer’ refers to an
appropriate engineer who is independent of the contractor responsible for the vibratory ground improvement techniques.
4.5
British Standards, codes of practice and authoritative documents relevant to vibratory ground improvement techniques and site
investigations include:
BS 10175 ‘Investigation of potentially contaminated sites – Code of practice’.
BS EN 1991 ‘Actions on structures’.
BS EN 1997-1 ‘General rules’.
BS EN 1997-2 ‘Ground investigation and testing’
BS EN 14731 ‘Execution of special geotechnical works – Ground treatment by deep vibration’.
BS EN ISO 14688 ‘Geotechnical investigation and testing – Identification and classification of soil’.
BS EN ISO 14689 ‘Geotechnical investigation and testing – Identification and classification of rock’.
BS EN ISO 22476 ‘Geotechnical investigation and testing – Field testing’.
BR 391 ‘Specifying vibro stone columns’.
ICE ‘Specification for Ground Treatment’.
4.5.2
Hazardous sites and ground hazards Also see: Chapter 2.1, 4.1 and 4.2
Vibratory ground improvement techniques on hazardous sites shall be reported to NHBC before work on
site commences, and be designed to take account of the characteristics of the site, including any ground
hazards.
Hazardous sites, as defined in the NHBC Rules, should be reported to NHBC in writing at least eight weeks before sitework
begins.
Details of ground hazards to be taken into consideration are given in Chapter 4.1 ‘Land quality – managing ground conditions’
and Chapter 4.2 ‘Building near trees’.
4.5.3
Desk study and site investigation Also see: Chapter 2.1, 4.1 and 4.2
The engineer shall ensure a desk study and site investigation are undertaken and findings used to inform
the design.
The engineer should establish the scope of, and supervise, the site investigation, taking account of the findings of the desk study,
and relevant standards listed in Clause 4.5.1.
The specialist contractor should be satisfied that the site investigation provides adequate and representative information in order
to design the ground improvements. The results of the site investigation and desk study should be sent to NHBC prior to work
starting and should, as a minimum, determine the items listed in Table 1.
Vibratory ground improvement techniques 2019 2
CHAPTER 4.5
Table 1: Results of the site investigation and desk study

Item to be determined Guidance
Depths and properties of natural Includes the presence of caves, workings, or natural phenomena such as rocks or soils
materials under the site which dissolve or erode when exposed to the passage of water.
Data for comparison with post-treatment properties should be established.
Extent and nature of any areas of Includes:
filled ground on the site proportions and distribution of constituent materials

state of compaction of the fill material throughout its depth

grading and particle size distribution of fill materials

potential for gas generation from fill materials

potential for spontaneous combustion of fill and/or natural deposits.

Presence and extent of any existing Includes information on the extent and nature of the backfill to the excavations.
or redundant services and drains
The effect of sustainable drainage Includes the effect that any sustainable drainage system (SuDS) may have on the
systems geotechnical parameters of the site.
Presence, level and nature of any Includes the potential for ground water to rise and cause heave or collapse by saturation.
ground water
4.5
Previous structures Includes any potential underground obstructions or hard-spots, e.g. basement walls,
floor slabs, which remain.
Occurrence of Includes the presence and extent of contaminated substances or gases present
contaminated substances or suspected.
4.5.4
Confirmation of suitability for treatment Also see: Chapter 2.1, 4.1 and 4.2
The builder shall obtain written confirmation from the engineer and specialist contractor that the site is
suitable for the proposed ground improvement system.
NHBC should be notified prior to work starting, that the site is suitable for the proposed system. The engineer and specialist
contractor should agree the following in writing before work commences on site:
Design objectives.
Tests to be conducted on completion of the work.

Detailed schedule of work.
Responsibility for procedures and tests.

Programme of work.

The following considerations should be taken into account:
Layout and depth of the stone columns and the accuracy
Responsibility for procedures and tests.

to be achieved. Calculations and case histories required to justify the

Safety issues to be incorporated into the design to allow for
ground improvement proposals together with the layout
unforeseen circumstances. of the stone columns and details of the equipment and
Criteria for non-acceptance of the vibrating poker worktests
process to be used on site.
to be conducted on completion of the work.
These written agreements should be made available to NHBC before work commences on site.
4.5.5
Suitability of ground conditions Also see: Chapter 2.1, 4.1 and 4.2
Vibratory ground improvement techniques shall only be conducted on suitable ground and be appropriate
for the site conditions. Issues to be taken into account include:
a) unsuitable ground conditions
b) detrimental factors
c) ground water conditions.
The engineer should assess the ground and be satisfied that it is suitable for treatment. Conditions acceptable for treatment are
only those within zones A and B of Chart 1.
3
CHAPTER 4.5
Chart 1: Conditions acceptable for treatment
Micron
1.18
3.35
37.5
mm
150
212
300
425
600
6.3
63
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
80
Zone B
70
Percentage passing
60
50 Zone A
40
30
20
4.5
10
0
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2 6 20 60 200 mm
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse Fine Medium Coarse
Clay Cobbles
Silt Sand Gravel
Zone A – range of materials suitable for deep compaction (vibro-compaction) techniques.

Zone B – range of materials suitable for stone column (vibro-replacement) techniques.
Unsuitable ground conditions

Table 2: Ground conditions not generally acceptable for treatment
Soil composition
Clays Ground with a Plasticity Index greater than 40%.
Soft clays Ground with soft clays with an undrained shear strength less than 30kN/m2.
For clay strength less than 30kN/m2 additional consideration must be given to group effects,
ground heave and settlement due to installation. Any proposals will be subject to NHBC agreement.
Ground with peat layers Ground with peat layers close to foundation level or the base of the stone column, or where
intermediate layers of peat are thicker than 200mm either as a single layer, or the sum of the
thicknesses of individual layers, throughout the length of the stone column.
Highly sensitive soils Ground liable to collapse or remoulding.
Ground with fill

Voided filled ground Ground which includes, for example, old water tanks, pottery, glass bottles, concrete rubble or brick
fill of unsuitable grading.
Loose or Ground with any loose or non-engineered fill not previously subject to rising or fluctuating water
non-engineered fill levels or saturation.
Filled ground which is Ground subject to settlement or settling:
still settling or expected under its own weight or due to the effects of

to settle surcharging/upfilling
where there is a high organic content

where decay is continuing.

settlement of fill layers with high organic content
Fill containing Ground where organic material forms more than 15% of fill by volume.
degradable material
CHAPTER 4.5
Highly contaminated ground

Ground which includes, Stone columns may act as vertical vents.
for example toxic waste, Consideration will be given to proprietary systems
or where inflammable, which do not permit vertical venting such as vibro
explosive or toxic gas concrete plug technology.
generation may
take place
stone column acting

as vent for
dangerous gases
Detrimental factors
4.5
When specifying vibratory ground improvement techniques, the following factors should be considered:
Partial depth treatment of filled ground. The engineer
Obstructions and variations in the density of fill and natural

should be satisfied with the anticipated performance of ground (hard spots) and the location of changes in the
both the treated and untreated zones. profile of the natural underlying ground, e.g. edges of pits
The specialist contractor should take responsibility for the
or quarries, slopes, or manmade obstructions such as
treated zone and the depth of treatment. soakaways or drainage runs.
Alterations to the oversite level before or after treatment, or
The minimum depth of soil treated, which should allow for

the disturbance of ground by excavations after treatment. the interaction of adjacent foundations.
Soils with a Modified Plasticity Index of 10% or greater;
Stone columns that may form vertical drains, allowing

foundations should be designed to accommodate the passage of water to a moisture-susceptible strata, or
volume changes. provide seepage paths for gases.
house A house B
stone column acting

as soakaway
foundation depth in
accordance with interaction of adjacent foundations
Chapter 4.2
Ground water conditions

When specifying vibratory ground improvement techniques, the following factors should be considered:
Long-term lowering of the water table causing settlement
Short-term rise in local water table due to large volumes

of existing adjacent buildings. of water used in wet process during construction causing
settlement or heave of existing adjacent buildings.
5
CHAPTER 4.5
adjacent building new building adjacent building new building
original depressed dry process original raised stone

water level water level stone column water level water level column
Surface water sewers should be used for rainwater disposal where possible, but where soakaways are necessary, these should
be positioned so that their construction and operation is not detrimental to the treated ground.
The effect of any new or existing sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) should be taken into account when vibro improvement
techniques are proposed.
4.5
4.5.6
Compatibility of the ground, design and treatment
Vibratory ground improvement techniques shall be compatible with the treated ground, site layout and the
home design. Issues to be taken into account include:
a) limitations of the treated ground d) use of suspended ground floors
b) limitations of ground support e) notice to NHBC.
c) suitable foundation types
Limitations of the treated ground

The engineer should:
avoid siting homes in locations where major changes in
discuss the feasibility of proposals with the

ground conditions can be expected specialist contractor
consider limitations of the configuration of the homes
confirm the required load and settlement performance of

including the vulnerability at junctions and of long blocks the treated ground
determine the loads to be imposed by the homes, and
advise and discuss design criteria with NHBC at the

assess these against the results of the site investigation design stage.
design loading
ground - bearing capacity

and settlement potential
Limitations of ground support

The engineer should establish the likely limits of ground
movement and account for this in the design, including:
the position and spacing of movement joints

the flexibility of masonry mortars

masonry reinforcement.

brick reinforcement and movement

joints in walls where required
CHAPTER 4.5
Suitable foundation types

The following criteria should be incorporated in the foundation design to ensure the compatibility and overall stability of the
foundations and superstructure:
Only two types of foundations are suitable, both of which should comply with the minimum criteria for areas of reinforcement

as defined in BS EN 1992-1-1. They are:
reinforced concrete strip foundation
reinforced concrete raft or semi-raft foundation positioned

on a uniformly compacted bed of hardcore
reinforced concrete
strip foundation
raft or semi-raft foundation
For both types of foundation, top and bottom reinforcement should be provided.
4.5
The depth of foundations to be a minimum of 600mm below the surface of the treated ground, and founded on firm material of
adequate bearing capacity.
Where the treated ground is of a granular nature, a reinforced concrete strip foundation will normally be acceptable provided

that the full depth of all fill material is treated.
If the treated ground is of a cohesive nature, a suitably designed raft, semi-raft or reinforced concrete strip foundation will

normally be acceptable.
The reinforced concrete foundation should be designed to span between the centres of adjacent stone columns unless a more

rigorous structural analysis is carried out to show that an alternative detail is acceptable.
If partial depth treatment of filled ground is proposed then a suitably designed reinforced concrete raft or semi-raft foundation

should be used.
If during excavations for foundations in treated ground it is found that excessive depths of concrete are required, then

precautions should be taken to ensure overall stability of the foundations, and the engineer should be satisfied that
construction of the foundation will not be detrimental to the treated ground.
Use of suspended ground floors

Suspended ground floors should be provided for all homes where vibratory ground improvement has been conducted, unless the
engineer can substantiate an alternative solution that is acceptable to NHBC.
Notice to NHBC
Where vibratory ground improvement is proposed, NHBC should be informed of:
proposed development
proposed start date of treatment.

appointment of the specialist contractor

4.5.7
Acceptable methods
Vibratory ground improvement techniques shall only be conducted using methods that are appropriate to
the ground conditions and acceptable to NHBC.
There are two main vibratory methods commonly used in the UK. These are known as the ‘dry bottom feed’ and ‘dry top feed’
methods. A third method, infrequently used in the UK and known as the ‘wet bottom feed’, is also acceptable to NHBC.
Dry bottom feed method
The dry bottom feed method is adopted in weaker soils or situations where there is a high water table and the bore hole is liable
to collapse between vibrator insertions.
7
CHAPTER 4.5
The vibrator penetrates by its mass, air flush and vibration.

At design depth, the stone is introduced via a hopper into
a pipe fixed to the side of a vibrator. The stone, generally
of 40mm size, exits the pipe at the tip of the vibrator and
discharges in to the bottom of the bore hole. The stone is then
compacted into the surrounding soil by repeated withdrawal
and insertion of the vibrator.
Dry top feed method
The dry top feed method is only used on cohesive soils where
the bore hole can remain open. The vibrator penetrates the
weak soil, or fill, by its mass, air flush and vibration to form a
bore hole.
Once refusal or design depth is reached, the vibrator is
removed and stone fill introduced into the bore hole, the
‘charge’ is generally 500-800mm deep. The vibrator is re-
inserted and ‘packs’ the stone into the surrounding strata.
4.5
Successive charges of stone are added and compacted,

bringing the column up to working level. The stone grading is
generally 40-75mm.
4.5.8
Materials for use as fill Also see: BRE Special Digest 1 Part 1, BRE Special Digest 433 and BS EN 771
Stone fill for forming columns shall be compatible with the ground conditions, and be suitable for the
vibratory ground improvement process.
Column fill should be a clean, hard, inert material. Limestone fill may not be acceptable in acidic ground conditions.
Suitable sources for fill material
All material used for fill should be suitable.
Where the material is of a stable and uniform type from one source, it may only be necessary to check its suitability once.
Regular inspections and/or testing may be required where material is variable or from a number of sources.
Where material is obtained from stockpiles, the uniformity should be checked. Different forms of stockpiling can affect particle
size and grading. The outside of a stockpile may be weathered and may not be the same as unweathered material. The use of
recycled aggregate as fill should comply with BRE Digest 433 or other suitable guidance as agreed with NHBC.
Hazardous materials
The following materials require testing to ensure their suitability for use as fill to support structural foundations and slabs, or as
backfill to associated trenches:
Acid wastes.
Toxic materials.

Reactive materials.
Materials that cause noxious fumes, rot, undue settlement

Materials that include sulfates, e.g. gypsum.
or damage to surrounding materials.
Organic materials.

Test requirements for fill material
Tests should be carried out by a suitably qualified person with a detailed knowledge of the:
material to be tested
proposed conditions of use.

The samples which are tested must be representative of the true nature of the material. It may be necessary to take a number of
samples to find out the material characteristics of the fill.
Sulfate content should be expressed as a percentage SO4 by weight on the basis of acid soluble testing, taking full account of
the recommendations of BRE Special Digest 1 Part 1.
Fill material requiring NHBC acceptance
The following types of fill should not be used unless written agreement has been obtained from NHBC:
Colliery shale and any other residue from mineral
Material obtained from demolition.

extraction. On wet sites, or sites with a high water table, crushed

Slags.
or broken bricks which have no limit on their soluble salt
Furnace ashes and other products of combustion.
content (as defined in BS EN 771).
CHAPTER 4.5
Expansive fill materials

Fill containing expansive material is not acceptable for use as support to structural foundations and slabs, or as backfill to
associated trenches.
4.5.9
Granular material
Granular material for raising site levels before treatment, or adding during deep compaction, shall be
suitable for compaction and, unless appropriate precautions are taken, be free from hazardous materials.
The grading of material for adding during deep compaction should be within Zone A of Chart 1. Well graded, inert fill which
passes a 100mm x 100mm screen in all directions and contains less than 10% fine material of silt or clay size will generally be
acceptable for raising site levels.
Precautions, including testing where appropriate, should be taken where hazardous materials are present in fill.
4.5.10
Sitework
When using vibratory ground improvement techniques, the builder shall ensure that the engineer visits the
4.5
site and provides competent supervision throughout the ground treatment process. Issues to be taken into
account include:
a) engineer checks
b) location, depth and alignment of columns
c) managing unforeseen circumstances.
Engineer checks
The engineer should provide competent site supervision throughout the ground treatment process and at critical stages,
including:
the inspection of setting out
checking of materials

the installation of columns during the early stage of the
where installation data differs from design assumptions

work where changes in treatment layout are required.

Some aspects of sitework may be the responsibility of the engineer or their representative, or of the specialist contractor, rather
than of the builder.
Location, depth and alignment of columns

Supervision should ensure that:
the minimum required depth of the stone columns is
missing stone columns are replaced

achieved and each one correctly located (the builder stone columns which are misaligned by more than 150mm

should provide sufficient profiles to enable locations to in any direction are replaced
be checked) the location of all stone columns is checked by the

the stone columns are located either centrally under the
engineer’s representative prior to the specialist plant
foundations they are to support or are in the predetermined leaving the site.
staggered arrangement, at a maximum of 2m centres and
at the intersection of adjacent reinforced concrete strips
2m max.
centres
2m max.
centres
missing stone stone column stone column

column = misaligned by misaligned by less
new column more than than150mm =
required 150mm = no action needed
new column
required
in correct position
9
CHAPTER 4.5
Managing unforeseen circumstances

Table 3: Actions for managing unforeseen circumstances
Circumstance Action In all cases
Unforeseen changes or trends which affect Recorded and reported to the Where there is an effect on the final
the site conditions engineer immediately efficiency of the treatment, this should
Change in the anticipated depth of the Recorded and reported to the engineer be fully considered by the engineer
compaction point in excess of 25% and specialist contractor as soon as and the specialist contractor.
possible but no later than the end of The builder and NHBC are to be
Variation of over 50% in the quantity of backfill advised immediately regarding
used in compaction points of the same length the working day of occurrence proposed remedial measures.
Allowance should be made for unforeseen obstructions that

require either local removal and backfilling prior to treatment,
realignment or additional columns, coupled with local
amendment of foundation design.
4.5
depth 25% 50% more

greater than backfill than
anticipated anticipated
4.5.11
Adjacent excavations
The builder shall ensure that foundations are not disturbed by adjacent excavations.
The engineer should consider the influence of drainage and
other service trenches on the stability of the complete design.
The minimum clearance between excavations and foundations
must not be less than the depth of excavation minus the depth
of the structural foundation. Particular attention is needed for excavation and
drain/service
excavation below the water table. trenches should
be above 45º line
4.5.12
Verification of completed treatment
The engineer shall require the specialist contractor to verify that the ground treatment is
satisfactory, including:
a) suitable testing
b) written confirmation of completed treatment
c) recording of work.
Suitable testing
Tests should be carried out to establish the degree of ground improvement, the load-bearing characteristics and
settlement potential.
The specialist contractor should:
predict the results from his experience of work on the type
agree results and tolerance with the engineer with

of ground prior to the test taking place actual results.
agree results and tolerance with the engineer prior to

testing
Where the results are vastly different, a further investigation may be necessary.
Where a threefold improvement were predicted and only a twofold improvement achieved, this could indicate that the ground
was different to that identified in the investigation, or that the treatment carried out differed from the specified treatment.
Tests on ground containing clay soils may need to be conducted several days after completion to allow excess pore pressures
to dissipate. The engineer may choose any appropriate combination of the tests detailed in Table 4, with the agreement of
NHBC.
CHAPTER 4.5
Table 4: Test methods

Test Comments
600mm diameter plate tests Plate tests will not determine the design but will allow for an assessment to be made of the
workmanship on the stone columns.
The tests should be carried out on stone columns or treated ground at a frequency of at least
one test per day per rig.
Dummy footing test/mini A mini zone test can be used as a limited
zone test substitute for zone tests. The test should be
applied to at least two stone columns and the
area of foundation which they support.
The load may be applied through a rigid beam
or stiffened plate using skips or other known
loads, arranged to give a uniform distribution
of the load.
4.5
Mini zone tests should be continued for a sufficient time to allow creep behaviour to
be quantified. Allowances for this time should be made in the overall project programme.
Table 4 (continued): Test methods

Test Comments
Zone test An isolated pad or strip footing is used to test
up to eight stone columns and the intervening
ground. Loadings which should simulate the
dwelling loads are held for 24 hours at
predetermined stages to examine
creep behaviour.
In-situ test Where vibration will improve the ground itself, e.g. granular materials, then in-situ testing
is appropriate.
Improvement can be assessed when the in-situ test results are compared with the
pretreatment investigation.
Trial pits Trial pits can be excavated around trial stone columns to prove that they are fully formed and to
the required depth and diameter.
This is a destructive test, and allowance should be made accordingly.
Written confirmation of completed treatment

On completion of the treatment, the engineer should:
use the test results to verify that the treated ground has
advise the builder of any special precautions which should

achieved the anticipated condition assumed in the design be taken for the positioning of services both beneath the
advise the builder and NHBC in writing of the verified
home and adjacent to it.
effectiveness of treatment in relation to the design
Recording of work
A comprehensive record of all works should be made available to NHBC, including:
information concerning the treatment
on-site changes

depth of fill
any other relevant information.

volume of stone used

NHBC is authorised by the Prudential
Regulation Authority and regulated
by the Financial Conduct Authority and
the Prudential Regulation Authority.
NHBC is registered in England

under company number 00320784.
NHBC’s registered address is NHBC
House, Davy Avenue, Knowlhill,
Milton Keynes, Bucks MK5 8FP.
NHBC Standards 2018 have

been printed on material
which is produced from
sustainable forests and is fully
recyclable and biodegradable,
ECF (elemental chlorine free)
and is made to ISO 14001
Enviromental Certification.
NHBC, NHBC House,

Davy Avenue, Knowlhill,
Milton Keynes,
Bucks MK5 8FP
Tel: 0344 633 1000
Fax: 01908 747255
www.nhbc.co.uk
© Designed and produced by NHBC

Effective from 01/19

NHBC Standards 2019 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NHBC Standards 2019 4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NHBC Standards 2019 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STANDARDS

Suitable persons for the level of investigation

Geotechnical and contamination issues

If any unforeseen hazards are found during the course of

the site has been properly assessed and investigated

Table 1: Potential hazards and associated risks

subsidence, settlement and/or excessive tilt

A consultant or specialist acceptable to NHBC should be appointed to:

The consultant or specialist should:

Contamination hazards present: Yes Yes No No

Physical growth of young trees

Protection of remaining trees and hedgerows

Trees should be protected from damage by:

Removal of existing trees and hedgerows

4.2.4 Also see: Arboricultural Advisory and Information Service, Arboricultural

Soil classification, shrinkage and heave

Table 1: Modified Plasticity Index related to volume change potential

Water demand, tree heights and lateral zone of tree influence

Table 3: Water demand of tree species in relation to their height

be provided, based on tree height at time

Table 3b: Zone of influence (lateral extent) of trees.

is unclear which zone applies, the lower reduction value

Londonderry Dumfries 0.25m (250mm)

Shrewsbury Stafford Norwich

Distance between tree and foundation

Method of assessment of foundation depths

Foundation Depth Calculator App.

Method Taking account of Comments

with this chapter to a soil volume change potential

Foundation depths related to the zone of influence of new tree planting

Foundation depths related to new shrub planting

Table 6: Shrub planting

The foundation design should consider shrub planting as follows:

4.2.8 Also see: Chapters 4.3, 4.4 and

Trench fill foundations

Measurement of foundation depths

Measurement of foundation depths where ground levels tree to remain

are reduced or increased, either in the recent past or during

Use the lower of:

Granular infill beneath raft foundations in shrinkable soils

be at least 50% of the foundation depth and not more

extend beyond the edge of the foundation by a distance equal

Potential for ground movement

Minimum void dimensions

Low 0mm 50mm 200mm

Proprietary materials to accommodate heave

Heave precautions for foundations

It is essential that heave material is provided to the entire

It is essential that heave material is provided to the entire areas shown.

Other foundation types

Suspended ground floors

Paths and driveways

Table 9: Volume change potential

Minimum depth 1.0m Moderate

Minimum depth 0.9m High

14 1.00 1.10 1.25 1.35 1.40 1.50 1.55 14

14 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.15 1.25 1.30 1.35 14

14 0.75 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 14

Lombardy poplar Sycamore