Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    Date: - Lab Manual Chemical Process Optimization (Ch-404) Lab No: - Roll No

    Uploaded by

    Aisha Ellaf
    This document contains a rubric for assessing student performance in a chemical process optimization lab (CH-404). It evaluates students on 5 criteria: presence in lab, program standards, program execution, design and correct output, and documentation. Each criterion is scored on a scale of excellent to poor, with defined requirements for each level. For example, for presence in lab, an excellent score requires being present and actively participating, while a poor score is for failing to show up or being in lab but not participating. The rubric provides a total possible score of 20 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Date: - Lab Manual Chemical Process Optimization (Ch-404) Lab No: - Roll No

    Uploaded by

    Aisha Ellaf
    33 views2 pages
    This document contains a rubric for assessing student performance in a chemical process optimization lab (CH-404). It evaluates students on 5 criteria: presence in lab, program standards, program execution, design and correct output, and documentation. Each criterion is scored on a scale of excellent to poor, with defined requirements for each level. For example, for presence in lab, an excellent score requires being present and actively participating, while a poor score is for failing to show up or being in lab but not participating. The rubric provides a total possible score of 20 points.

    Original Title

    Lab Document file (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a rubric for assessing student performance in a chemical process optimization lab (CH-404). It evaluates students on 5 criteria: presence in lab, program standards, program execution, design and correct output, and documentation. Each criterion is scored on a scale of excellent to poor, with defined requirements for each level. For example, for presence in lab, an excellent score requires being present and actively participating, while a poor score is for failing to show up or being in lab but not participating. The rubric provides a total possible score of 20 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    33 views2 pages

    Date: - Lab Manual Chemical Process Optimization (Ch-404) Lab No: - Roll No

    Uploaded by

    Aisha Ellaf
    This document contains a rubric for assessing student performance in a chemical process optimization lab (CH-404). It evaluates students on 5 criteria: presence in lab, program standards, program execution, design and correct output, and documentation. Each criterion is scored on a scale of excellent to poor, with defined requirements for each level. For example, for presence in lab, an excellent score requires being present and actively participating, while a poor score is for failing to show up or being in lab but not participating. The rubric provides a total possible score of 20 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Date: _________

    LAB MANUAL
    CHEMICAL PROCESS OPTIMIZATION (CH-404)
    Lab No: ____ Roll No: __________
    LAB ASSESSMENT RUBRICS

    Student Name: ________________________

    Program (Excellent) (Good) (Average) (Fair) (Poor)


    (20 pts) (20~18) (17-14) (13-10) (09-05) (04-00)
    Programmer
    Programmer Programmer Programmer
    Programmer failed to show
    was few was late by was late by
    Presence in was present up at all or
    minutes late half but half and did
    Lab and actively was in lab but
    but actively actively not actively
    20% participated failed
    participated participated participated
    during Lab participate in
    during Lab during Lab during Lab
    activities
    Few Several
    inappropriate inappropriate
    Program is design design
    Standards stylistically choices (i.e. choices (i.e. Program is Failed to write
    20% well poor variable poor variable poorly written Program
    designed names, names,
    improper improper
    indentation) indentation)
    Program
    Program Program
    executes
    Program executes executes Program does
    correctly Program does
    execution with a minor with a minor not execute at
    with no not execute
    30% (easily fixed (not easily all
    error’s
    errors) fixed error)
    messages
    Program
    Design and displays Output has Output is
    Output has Output is
    correct output correct multiple completely
    minor errors incorrect
    20% output with errors incorrect
    no errors
    Missing two
    Program is Missing one Most All
    Documentation or more
    well required documentation documentation
    10% required
    documented comment missing missing
    comments

    Total Score = /20

    Remarks if any:

    Signature with date: __________________________

    1
    Date: _________
    LAB MANUAL
    CHEMICAL PROCESS OPTIMIZATION (CH-404)
    Lab No: ____ Roll No: __________

    TITLE:

    DESCRIPTION:

    CODES:
    1. m. file:

    2. command window:

    RESULT & DISCUSSION:

    CASE STUDY:

    You might also like