Financial Policy and Corporate Strategy
Financial Policy and Corporate Strategy
Financial Policy and Corporate Strategy
❑ Financial Planning
strategic allocation of limited funds between alternative uses in such a manner, that the companies
have the ability to sustain or increase investor returns through a continual search for investment
opportunities that generate funds for their business and are more favourable for the investors.
Therefore, all businesses need to have the following three fundamental essential elements:
• A clear and realistic strategy,
• The financial resources, controls and systems to see it through and
• The right management team and processes to make it happen.
We may summarise this by saying that:
Irrespective of the time horizon, the investment and financial decisions involve the following
functions 1:
• Continual search for best investment opportunities;
• Selection of the best profitable opportunities;
• Determination of optimal mix of funds for the opportunities;
• Establishment of systems for internal controls; and
• Analysis of results for future decision-making.
Since capital is the limiting factor, the strategic problem for financial management is how limited
funds are allocated between alternative uses.
The key decisions falling within the scope of financial strategy are as follows:
1. Financing decisions: These decisions deal with the mode of financing or mix of equity
capital and debt capital.
2. Investment decisions: These decisions involve the profitable utilization of firm's funds
especially in long-term projects (capital projects). Since the future benefits associated with such
projects are not known with certainty, investment decisions necessarily involve risk. The projects
are therefore evaluated in relation to their expected return and risk.
3. Dividend decisions: These decisions determine the division of earnings between payments
to shareholders and reinvestment in the company.
4. Portfolio decisions: These decisions involve evaluation of investments based on their
contribution to the aggregate performance of the entire corporation rather than on the isolated
characteristics of the investments themselves.
You have already, learnt about the Financing, Investment and Dividend decisions in your
Intermediate (IPC) curriculum, while Portfolio decisions would be taken in detail later in this Study
Material.
3. FINANCIAL PLANNING
Financial planning is the backbone of the business planning and corporate planning. It helps in defining
the feasible area of operation for all types of activities and thereby defines the overall planning framework.
Financial planning is a systematic approach whereby the financial planner helps the customer to maximize
his existing financial resources by utilizing financial tools to achieve his financial goals.
Financial Planning = FR + FT + FG
For an individual, financial planning is the process of meeting one’s life goals through proper
management of the finances. These goals may include buying a house, saving for children's
education or planning for retirement. It is a process that consists of specific steps that help s in
taking a big-picture look at where you financially are. Using these steps, you can work out where
you are now, what you may need in the future and what you must do to reach your goals.
Outcomes of the financial planning are the financial objectives, financial deci sion-making and
financial measures for the evaluation of the corporate performance. Financial objectives ar e to be
decided at the very outset so that rest of the decisions can be taken accordingly. The objectives
need to be consistent with the corporate mission and corporate objectives. Financial decision
making helps in analyzing the financial problems that are being faced by the corporate and
accordingly deciding the course of action to be taken by it. The financial measures like ratio
analysis, analysis of cash flow statement are used to evaluate the performance of the Company.
The selection of these measures again depends upon the Corporate objectives.
Along with the mobilization of funds, policy makers should decide on the capital structure to
indicate the desired mix of equity capital and debt capital. There are some norms for debt equity
ratio which need to be followed for minimizing the risks of excessive loans. For instance, in case of
public sector organizations, the norm is 1:1 ratio and for private sector firms, the norm is 2:1 ratio.
However, this ratio in its ideal form varies from industry to industry. It also depends on the
planning mode of the organization. For capital intensive industries, the proportion of debt to equity
is much higher. Similar is the case for high cost projects in priority sectors and for projects in
underdeveloped regions.
Another important dimension of strategic management and financial policy interface is the
investment and fund allocation decisions. A planner has to frame policies for regulating
investments in fixed assets and for restraining of current assets. Investment proposals mooted by
different business units may be divided into three groups. One type of proposal will be for addition
of a new product by the firm. Another type of proposal will be to increase the level of operation of
an existing product through either an increase in capacity in the existing plant or setting up of
another plant for meeting additional capacity requirement. The last is for cost reduction and
efficient utilization of resources through a new approach and/or closer monitoring of the different
critical activities. Now, given these three types of proposals a planner should evaluate each one of
them by making within group comparison in the light of capital budgeting exercise. In fact, project
evaluation and project selection are the two most important jobs under fund allocation. Planner’s
task is to make the best possible allocation under resource constraints.
Dividend policy is yet another area for making financial policy decisions affecting the strategic
performance of the company. A close interface is needed to frame the policy to be beneficial for
all. Dividend policy decision deals with the extent of earnings to be distributed as dividend and the
extent of earnings to be retained for future expansion scheme of the firm. From the point of view of
long-term funding of business growth, dividend can be considered as that part of total earnings,
which cannot be profitably utilized by the company. Stability of the dividend payment is a desirable
consideration that can have a positive impact on share prices. The alternative policy of paying a
constant percentage of the net earnings may be preferable from the point of view of both flexibility
of the firm and ability of the firm. It also gives a message of lesser risk for the investors. Yet some
other companies follow a different alternative. They pay a minimum dividend per share and
additional dividend when earnings are higher than the normal earnings. In actual practice,
investment opportunities and financial needs of the firm and the shareholders preference for
dividend against capital gains resulting out of share are to be taken into consideration for arriving
at the right dividend policy. Alternatives like cash dividend and stock di vidend are also to be
examined while working out an ideal dividend policy that supports and promotes the corporate
strategy of the company.
Thus, the financial policy of a company cannot be worked out in isolation of other functional
policies. It has a wider appeal and closer link with the overall organizational performance and
direction of growth. These policies being related to external awareness about the firm, especially
the awareness of the investors about the firm, in respect of its internal performan ce. There is
always a process of evaluation active in the minds of the current and future stake holders of the
company. As a result preference and patronage for the company depends significantly on the
financial policy framework. Hence, attention of the corporate planners must be drawn while framing
the financial policies not at a later stage but during the stage of corporate planning itself. The
nature of interdependence is the crucial factor to be studied and modelled by using an in-depth
analytical approach. This is a very difficult task compared to usual cause and effect study because
corporate strategy is the cause and financial policy is the effect and sometimes financial policy is
the cause and corporate strategy is the effect.
Sustainable growth is important to enterprise long-term development. Too fast or too slow growth
will go against enterprise growth and development, so financial should play important role in
enterprise development, adopt suitable financial policy initiative to make sure enterprise growth
speed close to sustainable growth ratio and have sustainable healthy development.
The sustainable growth rate (SGR), concept by Robert C. Higgins, of a firm is the maximum rate of
growth in sales that can be achieved, given the firm's profitability, asset utilization, and desired
dividend payout and debt (financial leverage) ratios. The sustainable growth rate is a measure of
how much a firm can grow without borrowing more money. After the firm has passed this rate, it
must borrow funds from another source to facilitate growth. Variables typically include the net
profit margin on new and existing revenues; the asset turnover ratio, which is the ratio of sales
revenues to total assets; the assets to beginning of period equity ratio; and the retention rate,
which is defined as the fraction of earnings retained in the business.
The very weak idea of sustainability requires that the overall stock of capital assets should remain
constant. The weak version of sustainability refers to preservation of critical resources to ensure
support for all, over a long-time horizon. The strong concept of sustainability is concerned with the
preservation of resources under the primacy of ecosystem functioning. These are in line with the
definition provided by the economists in the context of sustainable development at macro level.
What makes an organisation sustainable?
➢ In order to be sustainable, an organisation must:
➢ have a clear strategic direction;
➢ be able to scan its environment or context to identify opportunities for its work;
➢ be able to attract, manage and retain competent staff;
➢ have an adequate administrative and financial infrastructure;
➢ be able to demonstrate its effectiveness and impact in order to leverage further
resources; and
➢ get community support for, and involvement in its work.
Source: CIVICUS “Developing a Financing Strategy”.
The sustainable growth model is particularly helpful in situations in which a borrower requests
additional financing. The need for additional loans creates a potentially risky sit uation of too much
debt and too little equity. Either additional equity must be raised, or the borrower will have to
reduce the rate of expansion to a level that can be sustained without an increase in financial
leverage.
Mature firms often have actual growth rates that are less than the sustainable growth rate. In these
cases, management's principal objective is finding productive uses for the cash flows that exist in
excess of their needs. Options available to business owners and executives in such cases
includes returning the money to shareholders through increased dividends or common stock
repurchases, reducing the firm's debt load, or increasing possession of lower earning liquid assets.
These actions serve to decrease the sustainable growth rate. Alternatively, these firms can attempt
to enhance their actual growth rates through the acquisition of rapidly growing companies.
Growth can come from two sources: increased volume and inflation. The inflationary increase in
assets must be financed as though it were real growth. Inflation increases the amount of external
financing required and increases the debt-to-equity ratio when this ratio is measured on a historical
cost basis. Thus, if creditors require that a firm's historical cost debt -to-equity ratio stay constant,
inflation lowers the firm's sustainable growth rate.
Mitsubishi Corporation (MC): New Strategic Direction (charting a new path toward
sustainable growth)
Mitsubishi Corporation has abolished its traditional "midterm management plan" concept of committing
to fixed financial targets three years in the future, in favour of a long-term, circa 2020 growth vision. The
"New Strategic Direction” consists of basic concepts on management policy together with business and
market strategies. It seeks to recognize the Company’s value and upside potential as a sogo
shosha capable of "providing stable earnings throughout business cycles by managing a portfolio
diversified by business model, industry, market and geography".
MC remains dedicated to sustainable growth but as evidenced by its guiding philosophy, the
"Three Corporate Principles", its business activities are even more committed to helping solve
problems in Japan and around the world. Its chief goal is to contribute to sustainable societal
growth on a global scale.
The summary of this New Strategic Direction is:
➢ Future pull approach eyeing 2020 with a vision to double the business by building a
diversified but focussed portfolio.
➢ Clear portfolio strategy: Select winning businesses through proactiv e reshaping of portfolio.
➢ Grow business and deliver returns while maintaining financial discipline.