Insurance Outline As of Jan. 26, 2021
Insurance Outline As of Jan. 26, 2021
Insurance Outline As of Jan. 26, 2021
Course Outline
Atty. Mary Ann L. Reyes
I. Introduction
A. History of insurance
B. Laws governing insurance
1. Section 2, RA 10607
2. Test of insurance
Read: White Gold Marine Services vs. Pioneer Insurance, GR No. 154514, 28 July
2005; Steamship Mutual Underwriting vs Suplicio Lines (2017)
D. Characteristics
1
3. aleatory (Art. 2010, Civil Code)
4. contract of indemnity (Sec. 4, RA 10607)
E. Elements of insurance
2. Prescription of Action
Read: Filcon Ready Mixed Inc. vs Vergara, July 15, 2020 (four years)
Vector Shipping Corp. vs American Home Assurance Co., July 3, 2013 (10
years)
J. Kinds of insurance
a. Cognition theory
Read: Development Bank of the Philippines vs. CA, GR. 100937, March 21, 1994
Enriquez vs. Sun Life Insurance of Canada, GR. 15895, Nov. 29, 1920
Great Pacific Life Assurance vs. CA, GR Nos. 31845 & 31873, April 30,
1979
2
1. the insurer, the insured, the beneficiary
2. See Art. 38, NCC;
3. rule on married women (Sec. 3, RA 10607 as superseded by Family
Code)
4. rule on minors (Sec. 3)
5. public enemy (Sec. 7)
Read: Great Pacific Life vs CA, 316 SCRA 677, Oct. 13, 1999
6. Effect of change of interest in the thing insured (Sec. 20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 57 & 58, RA 10607; Art. 1306, NCC)
Cases under this topic: Spouses Cha vs. CA, (August 18, 1997); Geagonia vs. CA,
February 6, 1995); RCBC vs. CA (289 SCRA 292); Gaisano Cagayan, Inc. vs. Insurance
Company of North America, G.R. No. 147839 (June 8, 2006).
3
IV. Devices for ascertaining and controlling risk and loss
A. Concealment
1. Concept (Sec. 26, RA 10607)
2. Duty to communicate (Sec. 28)
3. Test of materiality (Sec. 31)
4. Effect of concealment (Sec. 27 & 29)
5. Matters which need not be communicated (Sec. 30, 32, 34, & 35)
6. Waiver of information (Sec. 33)
B. Representation
Read: The Insular Life Assurance Co. vs Heirs of Alvarez, October 3, 2018
D. Warranties
Cases: Great Pacific Life Assurance vs. CA (316 SCRA 678); Sun Life Assurance Co. of
Canada vs. CA (G.R. No. 105135, June 22, 1995); Philamcare Health Systems Inc. vs. CA
(379 SCRA 356); Vda de Canilang vs. CA (G.R. No. 92492, June 17, 1993); Tan vs. CA
(June 29, 1989); Prudential Guarantee vs. Trans-Asia Shipping Lines, Inc. G.R. No.
151890, 20 June 2006; Manulife vs Ybanez, Nov. 28, 2016; Malayan Insurance vs PAP,
Aug. 7, 2013; Manila Bankers vs Aban, GR 175666, July 29, 2013; Florendo vs Philam
Plans, GR 186983, Feb. 22, 2012; Sun Life of Canada vs Sibya, June 8, 2016
Addl Cases:
The Insular Life Co. vs Heirs of Alvarez, GR 207526, Oct. 3, 2018 (concealment)
4
D. Papers attached to the policy and their binding effect (rider, warranties,
clause, endorsement)
E. Kinds of policy
1. open (Sec. 60)
2. valued (Sec. 61)
3. running (Sec. 62)
F. Cover notes (Sec. 52)
G. Cancellation of policy (Sec. 65-66)
H. Time to commence action on the policy; effect of stipulation (Sec. 63)
Cases: Pacific Timber Export Corporation vs. CA (112 SCRA 199); Great Pacific Life
Assurance Corporation vs. CA, 89 SCRA 543); PhilAm Life and General Insurance Co. vs.
Judge Valencia-Bagalacsa (GR No. 139776; August 1, 2002)
VI. Premium
A. Concept
B. Effect of non-payment of premium; Exceptions (Sec. 77, 79, RA 10607;
Art. 1306, NCC)
C. When insured entitled to return of premiums (Sec. 80-84)
D. Payment through salary deduction (Sec. 78)
E. Future premiums (Sec. 84)
Cases: Makati Tuscany Condominium Corp. vs. CA (215 SCRA 462); UCPB General
Insurance vs. Masagana Telamart (June 15, 1999); UCPB General Insurance vs.
Masagana Telamart (356 SCRA 307); American Home Insurance vs. Chua (G.R. No.
130421, June 28, 1999); Tibay vs. CA (257 SCRA 126); Phil. Phoenix Surety & Ins., Co. vs.
Woodworks, Inc., (92 SCRA 419); Marques vs Far East Bank, GR 171379, Jan. 10, 2011
Cases: Bonifacio Bros. Inc. vs. Mora (May 29, 1967); The Insular Life Assurance vs.
Ebrado, 80 SCRA 181); Vda. de Consuegra vs. GSIS (37 SCRA 315); Go vs. Redfern (72
Phil 71); Country Bankers Insurance Corporation vs. Lianga Bay (January 25, 2002);
Heirs of Maramag vs Maramag, GR 181132, June 5, 2009
IX. Reinsurance
5
A. Definition (Sec. 97)
B. Nature (Sec. 99 & 100)
C. Distinguished from double insurance
D. Duty of reinsured to disclose facts (Sec. 98)
X. Marine Insurance
A. Definition
B. Scope of marine insurance (Sec. 101, RA 10607)
C. Risks or losses covered in marine insurance
1. perils of the sea vs. perils of the ship
2. “all risks” marine insurance policy
a. barratry
b. jettison
c. inchmaree clause
E. Concealment
F. Representations
1. Effect of false representation by the insured (Sec. 113)
2. Effect of false representation as to expectation (Sec. 114)
6
e. cargo worthiness (Sec. 121)
H. Loss
1. Kinds of losses (total or partial, Sec. 129-130)
2. Kinds of total loss (actual and constructive) (Sec. 131-134)
3. When ship prevented from completing voyage (Sec.135)
4. Liability for damages in case of reshipment of cargo (Sec. 136)
5. Right to payment upon an actual total loss (Sec. 137)
6. Scope of insurance against actual total loss (Sec. 139)
7. When constructive total loss exists (Sec. 141)
8. Concept of abandonment and its requisites (Sec. 140-157)
9. Average
1. Kinds of average (particular and general)
2. Requisites of general average
3. Insurer’s liability for general average (Sec. 166-167)
10. Measure of Indemnity (Sec. 158-168)
11. One-third for new for old rule in marine insurance (Sec. 168)
Cases: Roque vs. IAC (139 SCRA 596); Go Tiaco vs. Union Ins. Society of Canton (40 Phil
401); Cathay Insurance vs. CA (151 SCRA 710); Filipino Merchants Insurance Co. vs. CA
(179 SCRA 638); Oriental Assurance Corporation vs. CA (200 SCRA 459)
Read: Finman vs CA; Sun Insurance vs CA; Biagtan vs The Insular Life
E. Glass Insurance
F. Employers Liability Insurance
G. Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance (vis a vis comprehensive)
H. Compulsory Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance (Sec. 386-402, RA 10607)
7
2. Third Party Defined (Sec. 386c)
3. Amount of Indemnity (Sec. 390)
4. No Faulty Indemnity Clause (Sec. 391) – to who shall injured party
file the claim with
5. Change of Ownership (Sec. 395)
6. Notice of Claim/Prescription of Action (Sec. 397, 398)
7. Direct Liability of Insurer to Third Party
Cases: Finman General Assurance Co. vs. CA (September 2, 1992); Sun Insurance Office
Ltd. vs. CA (July 17, 1992); Biagtan vs. The Insular Life Assurance Co., Ltd., (44 SCRA
58); Tiu vs Arriesgado, Sept. 1, 2004; Malayan Insurance vs Philippine First Insurance,
July 11, 2012 (TPL); Villacorta vs IC, Oct. 28, 1980; Malayan Insurance vs Alberto, Feb.
1, 2012; Vda. de Gabriel vs. CA (November 14, 1996); Vda. de Maglana vs. Hon.
Consolacion (August 6, 1992);
XIII. Suretyship
Read: Cellpage Intl Corp vs The Solid Guaranty Inc., GR 226731, June 17, 2020
XV. Microinsurance
8
XVI. Claims Settlement
Cases: Tio Khe Chio vs. CA (September 30, 1991); Finman General Assurance
Corporation (July 12, 2001); see again: Prudential Guarantee vs. Trans-Asia Shipping
Lines, Inc. G.R. No. 151890, 20 June 2006
Read: Icon Development Corp. vs. National Life Insurance, March 9, 2020
A. Definition of HMO
B. Registration of HMOs
C. Are HMOs engaged in the insurance business
XV. Compulsory insurance for agency-hired oversease Filipino workers (RA 10022
amending RA 8042; insurance guidelines on Rule XVI of Omnibus Rules implementing
RA 8042 as amended by RA 10022)