Curriculum Comparison of Philippines' K-12 and Thailand's Basic Education Core Curriculum of 2008
Curriculum Comparison of Philippines' K-12 and Thailand's Basic Education Core Curriculum of 2008
Curriculum Comparison of Philippines' K-12 and Thailand's Basic Education Core Curriculum of 2008
net/publication/337869342
CITATION READS
1 16,198
1 author:
Josemari Cordova
Vongchavalitkul University
6 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Digital Divide Between Thai and Philippines Public Schools View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Josemari Cordova on 10 December 2019.
Introduction
The Philippines and Thailand’s connection can be traced through sea and
barter-trading centuries before the European colonizers set foot in Asia. The physical
evidence can be seen at the National Museum in Manila -- the Sawankhalok1 jars. The
earliest known diplomatic relations between the two countries is carved in stone in front
of the statue of King Ramkamhaeng in Sukhothai Historical Park.2 Additionally, during
the time of King Naresuan of the Ayutthaya Kingdom, Ocampo (2011) believed that he
sent an elephant to the Kingdom of Lusong asking for soldier-reinforcements in the war
against the advancing Portuguese and Burmans.
The pre-colonial Philippines and Thailand also share the same structure of
educating its people during those times -- informal, only the members of the nobility and
the ruling class were educated, and developed their own system of language and writing.3
As both countries track their course in history, the former saw its allegiance to Western
powers while the latter stood as a Kingdom until this day. This also mirrors the
educational evolutions in both countries where the former’s curriculum is patterned from
the West while the latter has intrinsically developed and inline with the late King
Bhumibol’s Sufficiency Economy Philosophy. However, the two countries curriculum
1
Sawankhalok is a small district in Sukhothai Province. Known for its jars, the ancient jar-making
tradition is still practiced but confined in Tambon (village) Chaliang until this day.
2
Sukhothai Historical Park is a World Heritage Park and used to be the seat of power of the
Sukhothai Kingdom. It is situated 13 kilometers west from the new Sukhothai City.
3
Laguna Copper-Plate Inscription (LCI) found in Lumban, Laguna in 1989, is considered the
earliest known written document in the Philippines. It contains Malay-based language that has
Javanese honorifics, a number of Kapampangan and Tagalog words, as well as Sanskrit titles,
names, and terminologies. Ramkamhaeng the Great created the first Thai alphabet inscribed in
stone with the Mon and Khmer scripts which had, in turn, been derived from a South Indian script
in 1283.
2
needs to be compared not only on the basis of ASEAN connection but also on the
implementation of universal basic education.
According to Arnove (2007) we are comparing education to be able (1) to
contribute in the theory building especially to the formulation of generalizable
propositions about the workings of school system and their interactions with their
surrounding economies, polities, cultures and social orders; (2) to discover what can be
learned that will contribute to improve policy and practice at home in scientific and
historical approaches; and (3) to contribute to international understanding and peace.
Hence, this paper was undertaken to briefly compare the basic education curriculum of the
Philippines (K-12) and the Kingdom of Thailand’s Basic Education Core Curriculum of
2008, specifically to (1) identify the educational reforms undertaken by Thai and
Philippine governments from Jomtien Declaration of 1991 to present; (2) compare
Thailand’s Basic Education Curriculum of 2008 and the Philippines K-12 program in
terms of subjects/courses and learning time; and, (3) summarize the similarities and
differences of basic education in both countries.
The data in this study were obtained from secondary sources, especially official
online sources from both countries.
different parts of the Philippines and the missionaries were instrumental in the first
university in Asia, the University of Sto. Tomas in 1611.
The significant transformation in Philippine education, after centuries of
repression, was through the Spanish Education Decree of 1863, which opened the
education system from the basic to the tertiary level regardless of social status.
(Agoncillo, 1990; Abinales, 2005; Aguinaldo, 2011; Musa & Ziatdinov, 2012; Xin, 2017;
Aggabao, et al., 2018). The Spanish education system in the colonial Philippines can be
summarized as: (1) strict, formal and regulated academic instruction in place of traditional
and informal Filipino education through the erection of classrooms; (2) replacement of
tutors by friars as teachers; (3) Propagate the Christian faith by teaching the “Doctrina
Christiana” (Christian Doctrines) together with catechism to children in order to spread
Catholicism in the Philippines; and, (4) the friars controlled and regulated the educational
system as they took charge of the teaching of students, administering the schools and
implementing rules and regulations (Musa and Ziatdinov, 2012). However, only the
peninsulares4, insulares5, and the mestizos6can get good education. The “Segunda
Ensenanza” or secondary education was not open to Indios7 (Aguinaldo, 2011). The
Ilustrados8 studied in Europe.
American Colonization (1898-1935)
At the onset of American colonization in 1898, the U.S. Army opened the
Philippines’ first public school in Corregidor Island, after Admiral George Dewey
vanquished the Spanish Pacific fleet in Manila Bay on May 1, 1898.9 This was followed
by 48 teachers on-board USS Sheridan. In 1901, the USS Thomas docked in Manila
harbor with 600 teachers on-board. These army-teachers were called Thomasites. They
establish a new public school system, to teach basic education, and to train Filipino
teachers, with English as the medium of instruction (Stanley, 1990). According to
Agoncillo (1990), the new colonizers faced fierce resistance from the Filipino nationalists
and to quell down Filipino nationalism, education was seen as an essential part of the
4
Full-bloodied Spaniards, born in Spain but settled in the Philippines
5
Full-bloodied Spaniards, born and raised in the Philippines
6
Half-Spaniard, half-Filipino
7
Christianized, full-bloodied indigenous people of the Philippines
8
The educated class which was composed of native-born intellectuals whether Indios, Insulares
and Mestizos, among others. Most of the Ilustrados studied in Spain.
9
http://www.news.ops.gov.ph/archives2003/oct12.htm
4
10
https://www.deped.gov.ph/about-deped/history/
11
https://www.teacherph.com/history-system-education-philippines/
5
generations of the southern regions through the guidance of the Japanese culture.”12 Using
the schools and churches in the Philippines, Dacumo (2015) pointed out that the Japanese
forces introduced the “individuality” to Filipinos by not depending on the western cultures
and practices, uphold Filipino culture, and raise Filipino morality. The Japanese also
established the Commission of Education, Health and Public Welfare13 that lead to the
creation of the Ministry of Education with the mandate that (1) Instruction must be in
mother tongue (Filipino); (2) Emphasis on teaching History and Character Education; (3)
School and academic calendar became longer with more emphasis on days attended; (4)
No summer break for students; (5) Class size increased to 60; and, (6) American influence
curriculum was abolished while Japanese culture was introduced and made Nippon-go as
the official language and a compulsory subject in all schools. (Dacumo, 2015 & Aggabao,
et al., 2018).
Post-War to Martial Law (1945-1972)
The Philippines became independent from the foreign powers in 1946. The
Ministry of Education was abolished and renamed Department of Instruction that was
made part of the Department of Public Instruction. Through Executive Order No. 94, it
was renamed into Department of Education with the regulation and supervision of public
and private schools belonging to the Bureau of Public and Private Schools.14 During the
period of reconstruction to 1972, Education Act of 1940 was followed.
Education during Martial Law (1972-1986)
Upon the imposition of Martial Law In 1972, the Department of Education
became the Department of Education and Culture, then Ministry of Education and Culture
according to Presidential Decree No. 1 and Presidential Decree No. 1397, respectively.
The old curriculum was replaced by a new one through the Education Act of 1982. Tulio
(2008) summarized that EA of 1982 provided for an integrated system of education
covering both formal and non-formal education at all levels which aimed to:
“(1) upgrade educational institutions' standards to achieve “quality education”
through voluntary accreditation for schools, colleges, and universities (Sec. 29);
12
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000710366.pdf
13
https://www.deped.gov.ph/about-deped/history/
14
Ibid
6
“(2) imposed the upgrading of obligations and qualifications required for teachers
and administrators (Sec. 16 & 17); and,
“(3) the government providing for financial assistance to private schools (Sec.
41).”
Post-EDSA Education
When the dictator Marcos was deposed in 1986, a new (1987) Constitution was
ratified. It provided for the fundamental aims of education specifically the universal
elementary and high school education for children.15 The old name of Ministry of
Education, Culture and Sports (MECS) was changed to the Department of Education,
Culture and Sports (DECS). In 1990, the Philippines along with 154 developing countries
signed the Jomtien Declaration for Education for All (EFA). In 1991, the Congressional
Education Commission recommended the tri-focalization approach in the management of
education in the Philippines that led to the passage of RA 7722 and RA 7796 creating
Commission on Higher Education (CHEd) and Technical Educational and Skills
Development Authority (TESDA), respectively in 1994; and the RA 9155 or the
Governance of Basic Education (Department of Education) in 2001.
In compliance with the Jomtien Declaration, the Philippines started the
implementation of the Alternative Learning System, and the technical and vocational
education in 1999 for those who did not have or cannot access formal education in schools16
and the passage into law of Republic Act No. 8980 or the Early Childhood Care and
Development Act in December, 2000. Along with these, according to Syjuco (2005), were
the strengthening of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) and the
institutionalization of a ladderized interface between Technical-Vocational Education and
Training (TVET) and Higher Education (HE).
15
Art. 14, sec. 2, The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines
16
Executive Order Nos. 112 & 113, series of 2000
7
preaching, and morality at temples. Furthermore, royal and noble family members were
trained with high level classic art and literature in palaces. It was categorized as informal
education, which did not require any curriculum, evaluation, building, policy, plans and
purposes while parents and monks automatically played significant roles as teachers.
The Thai Ministry of Education divides the historical roots of education in
Thailand into: Sukhothai Period, Ayutthaya Period, Bangkok Period, and the
Contemporary Period.17
Sukhothai Period (1238-1378)
The education in Thailand can be traced its origin in the 13th Century when
Sukhothai was its capital. In 1283, Ramkamhaeng the Great created the first Thai alphabet
inscribed in stone with the Mon and Khmer scripts which had, in turn, been derived from
a South Indian script, as its bases. The stone also included the aspects of education being
taught during that time that centered on moral, intellectual and cultural aspects. There
were two levels of education during that time: (1) Education for the princes and sons of
nobles provided by the Royal Institution Instruction or the Rajabundit; and, (2) Education
for the commoners provided by the Buddhist monks.
Ayutthaya Period (1350-1767)
When the Sukhothai dynasty was gradually losing its glory, the center of power
and commerce shifted to Ayutthaya. The basic structure of education was for the princes,
boys of noble birth, and commoners. It was of an academic type. Occupational training
was generally handed down within the family or acquired through apprenticeship. This
educational set up persisted until the Bangkok period. Chindamani, p opular textbook for
the study of the Thai language was written during the reign of King Narai the Great and
used up to Rama V (King Chulalongkorn, 1868-1910).
Bangkok Period (1782-onwards)
After the fall of Ayutthaya in 1767, the Chakri dynasty instituted educational
reforms such as:
King Rama I (1782-1809) made education public through reforming the Buddhist
religion. Printed books in Thai were used in schools.
17
http://www.moe.go.th/main2/article/e-hist01.htm
8
King Rama IV (1851-1865) saw the importance of the English language to further
the knowledge since it became the lingua franca in the Far East. He made it a necessary
educational requirement for future government officials.
King Rama V (1868-1910) was instrumental in modernizing Siam. He opened the
first Thai modern school in the palace to educate young princes and the sons of nobles in
1871, set up an English school to prepare them for further studies abroad as well as a
number of schools outside the palace for the education of commoners’ children in 1884.
He also established the Department of Education to oversee the Kingdom's education and
religious affairs in 1887, that became Ministry of Education on April 1, 1892. On the
other hand, Queen Sribajarindra opened the Saowbha School for girls in 1897; the first
government school for girls, the Bamrung Wijasatri in 1901; and in 1913, the first women
teacher training school was set up at the Benchama Rajalai School.
In 1898, the first Education Plan was launched with the aim of educating in the
Bangkok area and the provinces. This mandates the educational organizations to offer
education that cover all levels -- pre-primary, primary, secondary and technical education
and higher education. This was divided in 1902 into two categories: general education and
professional or technical education by the National System of Education. Another feature
of this plan was that a variety of age limits for admission was imposed to motivate
graduation within a scheduled duration.
Rama VI continued the educational reforms started by Rama V and set up the
School of Arts and Crafts (Poh Chang) in 1913, and Chulalongkorn University in 1916.
In 1921, the Compulsory Primary Education Act was enacted while the first National
Education Scheme was implemented in 1932 that opens the education to every Thai
regardless of sex, social background and physical conditions.
In 1960, compulsory education was extended to 7 years and there were special
provisions for disabled children, who were originally exempted from compulsory
education. In 1977, Thailand's educational system was changed from a 4-3-3-2 structure
to a 6-3-3 system wherein six years of compulsory primary education is followed by three
years of lower secondary school and by another three years of upper secondary schooling,
which is still in use nowadays. Sangnapaboworn (2005) pointed out that the curriculum
reform in 1978 brought about the change of the duration of the primary level from 7 years
to 6 years, the 1980 National Primary Education Act provided that all villages should be
9
equipped with schools, and the development of primary education entered the completion
stage of universalization in the 1990s.
Baron-Gutty (2009) implied that modern education in Thailand was shaped by
strong political struggles brought by Western colonialism that it needed to stand firm,
Thai-ness, and creating a good Thai citizen.
In compliance with the Jomtien Declaration (Education for All) and the 1997
Constitution, the National Education Act 1999 was enacted and was amended in 2002.
The features of this Act were: (1) compulsory education shall be extended from 6 to 9
years, requiring children aged seven to enroll in basic education institutions until the age
of 16; (2) education shall be specially provided to persons with physical, mental,
intellectual, emotional, social, communication, and learning deficiencies, those with
physical disabilities; or the handicapped, or those unable to support themselves or those
disadvantaged. Education for specially gifted persons shall be provided in appropriate
forms in accord with their competencies; (3) educational institutions are authorized to
provide any one or all of the three types of education: formal education, non-formal
education, and informal education, with provisions on the accumulation, accreditation and
transfer of credits, including those acquired from work experience. The Office of Basic
Education Commission (OBEC) undertaken some experiments on Basic Education
Curriculum in 2001 and came up with the Basic Education Core Curriculum in 2008.18
Comparison of Curriculum
Philippines and Thailand require their citizens to have a compulsory universal
education in the kindergarten, elementary and high school.
The Philippines K-12
The primary aim of Republic Act No. 10533 or the K-12 program is to have a
“quality education at par with international standards.” K-12 enhanced the Philippines
basic education from 10 years to 13 years. It is mandated in the program that all pupils
entering Grade 1 must have undergone Kindergarten or pre-school and secondary level
adds two years or senior high school. Basically, it is Kindergarten + 6 years in elementary
+ 4 years in junior high school + 2 years in senior high school.
18
http://academic.obec.go.th/images/document/1525235513_d_1.pdf
10
The Department of Education (DepEd) stated that the K-12 has the following
features: (1) making curriculum will be relevant to the learners, or contextualization and
enhancement; (2) building proficiency through language, or mother tongue based
multilingual education; (3) integrated and seamless learning, or spiral progression; and,
(4) gearing up for future, or senior high school.
Thailand’s Basic Education Core Curriculum
Thailand’s education is anchored on Sufficiency-Economy Philosophy by the late
King Bhumibol the Great. Since 2008, the Basic Education Core Curriculum was
followed. This curriculum, according to Samudvanijja19 (2008) is provided to all Thai
children and youths will be of higher quality in regard to acquisition of essential
knowledge and skills required for learners’ lives in the constantly changing society.
Learners will also be able to acquire knowledge for continuous lifelong self-development.
The Basic Education Core Curriculum of 2008 is aimed at the full development of
learners in all respects, specifically: (1) Morality, ethics, desirable values, self-esteem,
self-discipline, observance of Buddhist teachings or those of one’s faith, and guiding
principles of Sufficiency Economy; (2) Knowledge and skills for communication,
thinking, problem-solving, technological know-how, and life skills; (3) Good physical and
mental health, hygiene, and preference for physical exercise; (4) Patriotism, awareness of
responsibilities and commitment as Thai citizens and members of the world community,
and adherence to a democratic way of life and form of government under constitutional
monarchy; and, (5) Awareness of the need to preserve all aspects of Thai culture and Thai
wisdom, protection and conservation of the environment, and public-mindedness with
dedication to public service for peaceful and harmonious co-existence.
19
Ibid
11
Subjects in Elementary
Philippines
Mother Tongue 50 50 50 50
Filipino - 30 30 30
English - - 30 30
Mathematics 50 50 50 50
Araling Panlipunan 40 40 40 40
Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao 30 30 30 30
Mother Tongue 50 50 - - -
Filipino 50 50 50 50 50
English 50 50 50 50 50
Science - 50 50 50 50
Mathematics 50 50 50 50 50
Araling Panlipunan 40 40 40 40 40
Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao 30 30 30 30 30
Total Learning Time (in mins) 270 310 360 360 360
12
Thailand (Prathom)
Science 80 80 80 80 80 80
Social Studies, Religion & 120 120 120 120 120 120
Culture
- History 40 40 40 40 40 40
- Religion, Morality and 80 80 80 80 80 80
Ethics, Civics, Culture
and Living in Society,
Economics, Geography)
Arts 80 80 80 80 80 80
Foreign Languages 40 40 40 80 80 80
Total Learning Time Not more than 1,000 hours for each year
13
Filipino 4 4 4 4
English 4 4 4 4
Science 4 4 4 4
Mathematics 4 4 4 4
Araling Panlipunan 3 3 3 3
Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao 2 2 2 2
Social Studies, Religion & Culture 160 (4 crs) 160 (4 crs) 160 (4 crs)
- History 40 (1 cr) 40 (1 cr) 40 (1 cr)
- Religion, Morality and Ethics, Civics, 120 (3 crs) 120 (3 crs) 120 (3 crs)
Culture and Living in Society,
Economics, Geography)
Total Learning Time 880 (22 crs) 880 (22 crs) 880 (22 crs)
Additional Courses provided by the Not more than 200 hours each year
school depending on students’ readiness
and priorities
Total Learning Time Not more than 1,200 hours for each year
A student who finished Junior High School has the option to proceed to Senior
High School/Upper Secondary or enrol in Vocational/Technical Courses. Such is credited
as Senior High School/Upper Secondary, too.
15
Understanding
Culture, Society
and
Politics
Physical
Education and
Health
16
Research in Pagsulat sa
Daily Life Filipino sa Piling
Larangan
(Akademik)
Research Project
Fundamentals of Business
Accounting, Marketing
Business and
Management 1
Business
Enterprise
Simulation
Understanding Physical
Culture, Society Education &
and Health
Politics
Physical
Education and
Health
18
Trends, Networks
and Critical
Thinking in the
21stCentury
Culture
Community
Engagement,
Solidarity and
Citizenship
Culminating
Activity
Physical Physical
Education and Education &
Health Health
Entrepreneurship
General
Chemistry 2
Research/
Capstone Project
Introduction to Understanding
the Philosophy of Culture, Society
the Human and Politics
Person
Empowerment
Technologies
Inquiries,
Investigations and
Immersion
Work Immersion/
Research/ Career
Advocacy/
Culminating
Activity
Authority (TESDA). Courses are: Agri-Fishery, Home Economics, ICT, Industrial Arts,
TVL Maritime.
(7) Sports
(8) Arts and Design
Social Studies, Religion & Culture 320 (8 crs) 320 (8 crs) 320 (8 crs)
- History 80 (2 crs) 80 (2 crs) 80 (2 crs)
- Religion, Morality and Ethics, 240 (6 crs) 240 (6 crs) 240 (6 crs)
Civics, Culture and Living in
Society, Economics, Geography)
Health & Physical Education 120 (3 crs) 120 (3 crs) 120 (3 crs)
Total Learning Time 1,640 (41 1,640 (41 1,640 (41 crs)
crs) crs)
Additional Courses provided by the Not less than 1,600 hours each year
school depending on students’
readiness and priorities
23
Total Learning Time Not more than 3,600 hours for a total of
three years
Conclusion
Both Philippines and Thailand’s modern and global curriculum traced its reforms
to the Jomtien Declaration of Education for All (EFA) in 1991. Both countries have
universal basic education -- Kindergarten-to-12 in the Philippines which was enacted in
2011 and implemented in 2016; the National Education Act of 1999 in Thailand, which
was amended in 2002 and fully implemented through the Basic Core Curriculum of 2008.
These are response to Education for All (EFA) Dakar Framework for Action in 2015.
While both countries acknowledge some gap in the implementation of Millennium
Development Goal targets for education, Thailand is ahead in education reforms and
already crafting for 2030 curriculum under Thailand 4.0.
Based from the curriculum, Philippines has Kindergarten + six years in elementary
+ 4 years in junior high school + 2 years in senior high school (K+6+4+2) while Thailand
has Kindergarten + six years in elementary + three years in junior high school + three
years in senior high school (Pre-school + 6+3+3). The basic education students in the
Philippines have lesser learning time than Thais. Additionally, Filipino students study
less in Science, Mathematics and Technology. Thai students study more of their History,
Arts and Culture (including Religion) than their Filipino counterparts. The Philippines
just adopted the use of mother-tongue as a medium of instruction while the Thais are now
receptive to different languages. It should be noted however, that the new education
curriculum was implemented in the Philippines only three years ago.
References
Aguinaldo, C (2011). History of the Philippine Education System. Retrieved October 15,
2019 from
https://claireaguinaldo.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/history-of-philippine-education/
Arnove, R.F. & Torres, C.A. (2007). Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global
and the Local. T hird Edition. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers, Inc.
Baron-Gutty, A. (2009). Introduction. Understanding the Challenges of the Educational
Reform in Thailand. In Chupradit, S. & Baron-Gutty, A. (eds.). Education.
Economy and Identity: Ten Years of Educational Reform in Thailand. I nstitut de
recherche sur l’Asie du Sud-Est contemporaine, 15-22. Retrieved October 24,
2019 from doi:10.4000/books.irasec.737
Coleman, A. (2009). The Friars in the Philippines. Creative Media Partners, LLC.
Dacumos, R. (2015). Philippine Colonial Education System. doi:
10.13140/RG.2.1.2507.7600.
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000710366.pdf
https://www.deped.gov.ph/about-deped/history/
Ministry of Education. (n.d.). History of Thai Education. Bangkok. Retrieved October
30, 2019 from http://www.moe.go.th/main2/article/e-hist01.htm
____________ (2008). The Basic Education Core Curriculum. Bangkok. Retrieved
August 19, 2019 from http://www.act.ac.th/document/1741.pdf
____________ (2008). Towards a Learning Society in Thailand: An Introduction in
Education in Thailand. Bangkok. Retrieved October 26, 2019 from
https://www.bic.moe.go.th/images/stories/book/ed-eng-series/intro-ed08.pdf
Muza, S., Ziatdinov, R. (2012). Features and Historical Aspects of the Philippine
Educational System. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(2), 155 –
176. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2012.2.155
Ocampo, A.R. (2011). Chulalongkorn’s Elephants: the Philippines in Asian History.
Manila: ANVIL Publishing.
Philippine Daily Inquirer ( 2018). What went before the K-12 program? R
etrieved
October 27, 2019 from
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/980733/what-went-before-the-k-12-program
etrieved October 26, 2019
Republic of the Philippines. (2010). What is K-12 Program? R
from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/k-12/
____________. K-12 Basic Education Curriculum. Department of Education. Retrieved
October 25, 2019 from
https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/about/k-to-12-basic-education-curriculum/
View publication stats
25