Ethiopia, Berbera Port and The Shifting Balance of Power in The Horn of Africa
Ethiopia, Berbera Port and The Shifting Balance of Power in The Horn of Africa
Ethiopia, Berbera Port and The Shifting Balance of Power in The Horn of Africa
Article
Ash Rossiter
Khalifa University of Science & Technology, UAE
ash.rossiter@kustar.ac.ae
Abstract
Upon Eritrean independence in 1993, Ethiopia became landlocked and therefore
dependent on neighbors – especially Djibouti – for access to international markets.
This dependency has hampered Ethiopia’s aspiration to emerge as the uncontested
regional power in the Horn of Africa. This article explains how Ethiopia has at-
tempted to manipulate extra-regional interest in the Horn’s coastal zone to alleviate
the major economic and political liabilities associated with landlockedness. Pre-
viewing the main argument, this article shows how Ethiopia was able to anticipate
dangers and opportunities linked to growing involvement of Gulf Arab States in
the ports of the region, and how it embarked on an expeditionary foreign policy
mission in the Gulf (specifically in the UAE) in order to steer investment towards
the port town where Addis Ababa could derive the most strategic advantage – Ber-
bera in semi-autonomous Somaliland. Moreover, this under-reported development
in the port architecture of the Horn of Africa will, we argue, have important impli-
cations for the balance of power in the Horn and potentially for Ethiopia’s bid to
ascend to the top of the region’s local hierarchy.
Keywords
Regional Security Complex, Landlockedness, Port Politics, Hegemony, Horn of
Africa, Gulf Arab States
Introduction
The recent intensification of involvement in the Horn of Africa’s coastal zone by
the Gulf Arab States1 has led to the surge in development activities at ports in the
1
Gulf Arab States are used throughout as a shorthand term for the six Gulf Arab monarchies that
region. These have coincided with various actions taken by Horn of Africa states
to affect the regional distribution of power to their advantage. This includes land-
locked Ethiopia’s strategic drive to reduce its dependency on Djibouti’s port for
imports and exports through the refurbishment, development and use of other,
regional ports: Port Sudan in Sudan, Berbera in the Somaliland region of So-
malia, and Mombasa in Kenya. It is the development of the port of Berbera, in
particular, that may prove the most radical in terms of challenging regional power
dynamics as well as international law.
While developments involving recent ports deals have received scant attention by
area specialists they have potentially wide-ranging consequences. These include
Djibouti’s virtual monopoly over maritime trade, the de-facto Balkanization of
Somalia and the prospect of the region’s rising power, Ethiopia, becoming the
regional hegemon. What commentary that does exist overwhelmingly focuses
on foreign involvement; it sees events as being externally driven and controlled,
denying agency to the Horn of Africa states even though they are the actors with
the largest stake in the course of events (Ulrichsen, 2011; Burke, 2016; Lefebvre,
2012). This omission is most striking in relation to Ethiopia, an aspiring regional
power with considerable strategic interests in which regional ports are developed
and by whom. Indeed, examining Ethiopian actions vis-à-vis Horn of Africa
ports in general, and Berbera more specifically, sheds new light on the means by
which an aspiring, albeit contested regional power seeks to capitalize on external
involvement in its region.
form the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and
the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
8
Scholarly focus on the regional level as a unit of analysis resulted in greater atten-
tion on the distribution of power within regions (Frazier & Ingersoll, 2010; Gar-
zón Pereira, 2014). One particular area of enquiry was whether emerging powers,
unleashed from the binds of a bipolar international system (Lake, 2009), might be
able to dominate their regions and emerge as regional powers (Buzan & Wæver,
2003).2 While the precise constituent characteristics of a regional power are con-
tested, some assumptions can be made. First, regional powers need to possess
superiority in terms of basic power capabilities vis-à-vis their neighbours. These
are measured in terms of demographic size, economic capacity and military prow-
ess.3 Second, there must be an inequity in the distribution of the power, allowing
the regional power to exert influence on the region (Destradi, 2010; 95; Buzan
& Wæver, 2003; 55-62). Third, they must have political aspirations to dominate
neighbours or at least be the leader in regional matters if domination is not at-
tainable (Genrewold, 2014; 5).
In purely material terms, but also relative to its neighbours, Ethiopia has a good
claim to be a regional power. First, with a population somewhere close to 100
million it is demographically much larger than its neighbours. It has the Horn
of Africa’s largest and arguably best-equipped military. Additionally, Ethiopia re-
mains by some distance the region’s biggest economy – and one that continues to
grow faster than its neighbours.4 Success in the economic sphere has, rightly or
wrongly, driven the narrative of Ethiopia as a power on the rise. Ethiopia’s advan-
tageous geography has been a factor in this development, especially its plentiful
natural resources of water. In sum, the distribution of power capabilities within
the Horn of Africa overwhelmingly favours Addis Ababa. But what of its aspira-
tions for leadership?
Ethiopia has a clear ambition to lead, to borrow Douglas Lemke’s term, the ‘lo-
cal hierarchy’ in the Horn of Africa (Lemke, 2002; 49). Ethiopia’s aspiring role
in supervising regional relations, however, is hampered by its conflictual relations
2
For a useful discussion on definition of ‘regional power’, see Flemes & Nolte (2010).
3
For a full and instructive exploration of the ontology of regional powers, see Nolte (2010).
4
The World Bank calculates that growth averaged 10.8% per year in 2003/04—2014/15 compared to
the regional average of 5.4%.
9
with its neighbours. It has fought wars with both Somalia and Eritrea, and Eritrea
is aligned with anti-Ethiopia factions in Somalia (Genrewold, 2014; 11). Be-
ing the seat of the African Union (AU) confers some influence on Addis Ababa
regionally, but its legitimacy as a leader is undermined by its internal troubles,
which include high levels of poverty, ethnic conflict, and food insecurity (Dehetz,
2008). Ethiopia may be a pivotal power in the region but its attempts thus far
to establish its credentials as a regional leader have largely been rejected by its
neighbours, which is often the case with aspiring regional leaders (Schirm, 2010;
Flemes & Wojczewski, 2010). Arguably, the most important constraint on Ethio-
pia’s aspirations for regional leadership is its lack of sea access. There will always
be a considerable gap between its aspirations and its ability to act as regional
power so long has it has a high level of dependency on one neighbour to access
international waters.
Ethiopia Surrounded
Broadly construed, the main activity of ports in history has been transferring
goods from ships to other means of transport and vice versa ( Jacobs, Ducruet &
De Langen, 2010; 97). Due to lower transaction and transportation costs, ports
also serve as nodes for production and manufacturing. For these reasons, ports
often form the centrepiece a country’s overall economic plan, especially in devel-
oping nations (de Langen, 2007; Humphrey & Schmitz, 2002; 1018). Conversely,
landlocked developing countries are at a major disadvantage (Paudel, 2014; Faye,
et al. 2004). The lack of direct sea access inhibits integration with the global econ-
omy and entails a transport cost disadvantage compared to states with sea access.5
Reducing maritime transit costs and more advanced logistics technology is exac-
erbating this imbalance in favour of sea-access states with well-developed ports.
Also, the fact that trade from a landlocked country must pass through a sovereign
transit country in order to access international shipping markets creates a serious
political vulnerability on the former. If a landlocked country and its transit neigh-
bour are in conflict, either military or diplomatic, the transit neighbour can block
borders, implement regulatory changes that impede trade, or simply increase tar-
iffs. Even when there is no direct conflict, landlocked countries are extremely
vulnerable to the political vagaries of their transit neighbours.
To be sure, Ethiopia has suffered from its dependency on its neighbours for an
outlet to the sea (Wuhib, 1997). The capture of Asmara in 1991 by the Eritrean
People’s Liberation Front (ELFP) and the overthrow of the Marxist Derg regime
of Mengistu Haile Mariam shortly thereafter resulted in the Eritrea declaring its
independence from Ethiopia in 1993. With the loss of Eritrean territory and the
5
Studies on the interaction between geographic location, trade and economic growth have shown that
landlocked countries on average experience weaker growth than maritime countries. See, for example,
Mackellar, Wörgötter & Wörz (2002); Limao & Venables (2001); and Glassner (2003).
10
Red Sea ports of Massawa and Assab, Ethiopia effectively became landlocked.
Though Ethiopia briefly continued to use the port of Assab - where three-quar-
ters of Ethiopian trade passed through duty-free until 1997 – it was forced to
shift its trading route to the port of Djibouti, which at that point had a poorly
functioning railroad and limited port facilities (Faye et al., 2004; 45-46). Dji-
bouti’s handling of Ethiopian general cargo and petroleum products quadrupled
overnight creating a necessity for upgrading port facilities (Styan, 2013; 5). As
Ethiopia’s population and economy have grown so has its need to expand its
export and import capabilities (World Bank, 2017).
Improvements have been slow in coming but with the assistance of mega-ports
operator Dubai Ports World (DP World), Djibouti developed world-class port
facilities in the late 2000s, which, for a time, were capable of keeping up with the
demands of Ethiopia’s booming economy (Chorin, 2010; The Economist, 2008).
Opened in 2009, Doraleh container terminal and port became the sole facility in
the region capable of handling 15,000-tonne-plus container vessels (Styan, 2013;
6). For its part, Ethiopia attempted to escape the high costs of freight services
and long transportation time for importing and exporting goods suffered by land-
locked countries by developing the Djibouti Corridor Authority (DCA) (Gal-
lup, Sachs, & Mellinger, 1999; Stone, 2001). Infrastructure development across
national borders is more difficult to arrange than similar investments within a
country. The DCA – a joint one-stop border post development project – has
proved only moderately successful, at least from an economic perspective, given
slow implementation and development as well as recurrent disputes with Djibouti
over transit and taxation (Cannon, 2015). Ethiopia’s 750km Ethiopia-Djibouti
electric railway, built with Chinese loans and cutting the journey time from Addis
Ababa down from three days by road to about 12 hours, has been more successful.
11
Yet, the result of these largely positive developments is that Ethiopia is now even
more reliant on the port of Djibouti – importing and exporting a full 95 percent
of its goods at the port (Gessesse, 2015).6
Dependence on Djibouti has rankled Addis Ababa, which has been exploring
alternative options to lessen reliance on its neighbour to the northeast since at
least 2006 (Giorgis, 2008). Ethiopia is understandably concerned by the strategic
national security implications of being overly reliant on a single access point for
trade and vital supplies. As such, Ethiopia has focused on securing access to ports
in neighboring countries, particularly the port of Berbera.
To begin with, the port is located in the Republic of Somaliland, which declared
its independence from the Republic of Somalia in 1991, but remains unrecognized
internationally. Given Ethiopia’s hosting of leadership role in both the AU and
the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), engagement with a
breakaway state such as Somaliland represents a grave political and legal headache
( Johnson & Smaker, 2014). Furthermore, as a state with firsthand experience in
losing significant territory to a breakaway state and experiencing inter-communal
violence and separatist insurgencies (Yihun, 2014), Ethiopia is understandably
reticent to formally recognize Somaliland ( Jeffrey, 2016). However, the existence
– officially or unofficially – of Somaliland has variously been supported and used
by Ethiopia since 1991 to further Ethiopian interests in the region, with Addis
Ababa maintaining an unofficial but very real embassy in Somaliland’s capital,
Hargeisa (Kaplan, 2008; Rudincová, 2016).7 This is because Ethiopia’s interest in
developing the port of Berbera and fostering closer ties with Hargeisa go beyond
strategic considerations such as resolving Ethiopia’s landlockedness or economic
considerations of imports and exports. Rather, the development and expansion of
the port of Berbera simultaneously supports the two primary pillars of Ethiopia’s
regional policy deemed essential to Ethiopia’s indivisibility, aspirations of hege-
mony and, indeed, survival. The first involves maintaining Eritrea’s isolation in
6
In 2015, Ethiopia imported a total of US$13 billion’s worth of goods, and exports around $3 billion
annually. Ethiopia relies on Djibouti except for flowers and some perishable agro-processed foods such
as meat.
7
The author obtained an Ethiopian visa from the unmarked, unofficial embassy in downtown
Hargeisa for overland travel from Hargeisa to Jijiga and Harar via the border crossing at Wachale/
Wajaale in April 2015.
12
Ethiopia has, until recently, been assisted in its goals vis-à-vis Somalia as much by
the international community as by internal problems within Somalia (Menkhaus,
2013). The cross-purposes of the international community coupled with and
reinforcing political instability in Somalia (Cannon, 2016a), particularly in the
capital Mogadishu, have resulted in the inability of the Somali Federal Govern-
ment (SFG) to do anything substantive about the de-facto independent Republic
of Somaliland as well as the almost entirely autonomous northeastern region of
Puntland.
Ethiopia has eyed the development of and access to the port of Berbera against
this backdrop. However, Ethiopia found itself unable to fully exploit opportuni-
ties to expand its influence and power not only because of the potential legal and
political headaches of doing deals with Somaliland, but also because of a paucity
of critical resources and human capital. For example, as far back as 2005 Ethiopia
and Somaliland signed a bilateral agency agreement on the Utilization of Port
of Berbera and Transit Service (African Intelligence, 2016). In 2008, Ethiopia
in the form of Ethiopian Shipping Lines (ESL) again exhibited keen interest
in Berbera Port (Port Strategy, 2011). However, it lacked the technical expertise
and resources necessary to transform the moribund brown water port into a com-
mercially viable export and import shipping hub (Davison, 2016). Additionally,
poor road infrastructure from the Ethiopian border with Somaliland at Wachale/
Wajaale to Berbera severely hampered the movement of goods.
unable to locate investors or companies with the incentive to take the substantial
political and legal risks associated with business in Somaliland (Ahmed, 2000;
Houssein, 2005; Yusuf, 2015). However, the outbreak of war across the Bab al-
Mandeb Strait and Gulf of Aden from Somalia, in Yemen, started a sequence
of actions and reactions creating both challenges to and opportunities for Addis
Ababa that would potentially reconfigure the regional order.
In early 2015, after years of intermittent rebellion in the north of the country, the
Houthis and their allies seized the Yemeni capital of Sanaa. When the Houthis
began marching south towards Aden, Saudi Arabia announced the beginning of a
pan-Arab military operation to roll back the Houthis and restore the government
(Knights & Mello, 2015). Saudi Arabia and the UAE – the two principal military
members of the coalition – initially used Djibouti, just across the Gulf of Aden, as
a support hub for operations in southern Yemen (Reuters Staff, 2015a; Alwasat,
2015; Emarat TV, 2015).8 However, in late April 2015, only a few weeks into the
campaign, an altercation between a senior Emirati diplomat and the commander
of Djibouti’s air force ruptured bilateral relations between the UAE and Djibouti
8
The bulk of the forces were from Saudi Arabia and the UAE. From the GCC, Bahrain, Kuwait and
Qatar also contributed small contingents. Senegal and Sudan also agreed to send troops.
14
(GSN, 2016).9 Relations were already sour after Djibouti tried to force a renego-
tiation of DP World’s 30-year port contract (2006-2036) and, after negotiations
faltered, made allegations that the Dubai-based company was involved in serious
corruption (Stevis & Fitch, 2016). As a consequence, the UAE (and to some ex-
tent Saudi Arabia) moved closer to Eritrea, which ended its formal cooperation
agreement with Iran (Solomon, 2016). Throwing in its lot with the Arab Gulf
States, Eritrea agreed to lease its Hanish Islands and facilities at the port city of
Assab to the UAE for 30 years. This was one piece of a much wider UAE-Eritrea
security agreement (Hokayem & Roberts, 2016; 171). With the signing of this
agreement Assab became the UAE’s first major power projection base outside
of the Arabian Peninsula (Getachew, 2010). Starting with very little, Assab has
been substantially developed by the UAE. It now includes a modern airbase10, a
military training depot, and, significantly, a deep-water port under construction
(Katzman, 2017; 17).
Following the UAE’s tightening relationship with Eritrea and the construction
activity at Assab Port, the Ethiopian leadership feared that the UAE’s attention
had swung towards Eritrea. A suitably panicked Ethiopia sent senior officials to
Abu Dhabi in October 2015 to plead with the country’s leadership not to pursue
9
The spat occurred after a UAE aircraft taking part in the operations over Yemen landed without
prior authorization at Djibouti-Ambouli International Airport. Unsubstantiated reports claim that the
argument descended into a fist fight.
10
Over 2016, the UN Monitoring Group documented “a significant evolution” in military activities in
and around Assab, including the presence of non-Eritrean military personnel, new military equipment
on the territory and the construction of new military infrastructure relating to air and naval capacity.
11
The UN monitoring team observed that Eritrea continued to harbour anti-Ethiopian armed groups,
including the newly created Patriotic Ginbot 7.
15
the deal with Eritrea and focus on refurbishing and utilizing the port of Berbera
(CDE, 2016). As Werqneh Gebeyehu, Ethiopia’s Minister of Transport put it,
“We are better off having the UAE investing in Somaliland than in Eritrea,” add-
ing, “We would not like to see any investment going to Eritrea...” (Somaliland
Sun, 2016).
Ethiopia had been attempting to curry the interest of Abu Dhabi and Dubai in
Berbera Port for some time and this round of urgent discussions was by no means
the first time Addis Ababa had engaged the UAE regarding Berbera. Indeed, the
Ethio-UAE Joint Ministerial Commission Meeting in Abu Dhabi was held in
April 2015 when the volume of trade exchange between the two countries report-
edly stood at over US$1 billion and Ethiopian statistical reports ranked the UAE
number eight in terms of foreign investment volume in Ethiopia (Embassy of
Ethiopia, 2015; WAM, 2015). The Joint Commission Meeting was reportedly the
result of an agreement to increase bilateral relations following a visit by the UAE
Foreign Minister to Ethiopia that occurred as far back as 2013. While no offi-
cial communiques mention Berbera specifically, statements by the UAE Foreign
Minister at the time were clear: The UAE and Ethiopia would pursue projects in
the Horn of Africa region deemed to be mutually beneficial (WAM, 2013).
While the Yemen conflict provided Eritrea with opportunities to leverage its stra-
tegic geographical position in order to win outside supporters and break out of
isolation it also provided opportunity spaces hitherto unavailable to Addis Ababa,
which duly took advantage of them. Preliminary discussions were held in March
2015 between Dubai-owned P&O Ports12 and the government of Somaliland to
develop ports in the region, particularly Berbera (Cornwell, 2016). These discus-
sions were themselves predated by a February 2015 deal between Ethiopia and
the government of Somaliland to develop the port (Davison, 2016). While the
two may be unrelated, the timing indicates otherwise, particularly given Ethio-
pia’s desire to quash the Assab deal and its admission that it still lacked resources
and expertise to effectively utilize or expand the port. “Ethiopia wanted 30 per-
cent of its trade to go via Berbera by July of 2015, according to a five-year growth
plan published in 2010,” noted Ethiopia’s Transport Minister. Linking the desire
to develop Berbera with alleviating Ethiopian dependency, he went on to say:
“As much as 97 percent of shipments are still going through Djibouti because of
problems with the capacity and the condition of Berbera’s port, the poor state of
roads to Ethiopia and the lack of international recognition for Somaliland’s state-
hood claims” (Davison, 2016).
Ethiopia’s push to develop Berbera Port and convince the UAE to abandon Assab
12
P&O Ports is a sister company of Dubai Ports World and though they share the same chairman, DP
World is owned by Dubai investment company Dubai World while P&O Ports is owned by state entity
Ports, Customs and Free Zone Corporation (PCFC).
16
Ethiopia’s diplomatic push and offer of economic incentives, coinciding with de-
velopments across the Gulf of Aden, finally achieved Addis Ababa’s desired re-
sults when, in May 2016, DP World signed an agreement to develop and manage
Berbera Port for 30 years (Stevis & Fitch, 2016).
13
At the time, DP World was locked in a court battle with the government of Djibouti. In 2014, the
government of Djibouti launched arbitration proceedings in London accusing DP World of paying
bribes to the former chairman of the Djibouti Ports and Free Zones Authority (DPFZA), Abdourah-
man Boreh, while the Doraleh concession was being negotiated.
14
Confidential interview with UAE official, Dubai, February 2017.
15
Confidential interview with Somaliland official in Hargeisa, January 2017.
17
help the UAE forces tighten its blockade against Yemen. The base decision was
reached after a parliamentary vote in Hargeisa in February 2017 in which 144
MPs voted in favour, two voted against, two abstained and nine other opponents
were escorted out of the chamber by soldiers (BBC, 2017a).
The vote for the military base and the Berbera Port deal with DP World have
provoked mixed reactions in Somaliland, with popular anger aimed at Somalil-
and’s President Ahmed Mohamed Mohamoud aka “Silanyo” and his family who
reportedly benefited personally.16 Anger also stems from inter-clan and sub-clan
rivalry over land, particularly in the Berbera area. The Somaliland Supreme Court
is reportedly interested in reviewing the deal.17
While the deal was reportedly rubberstamped by the government of former SFG
President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, Farah accused the SFG president and oth-
ers, in both Somalia and Somaliland, of corrupt practices. “We know that indi-
viduals within the leadership of Somalia and Somaliland were invited to Dubai
and that they were corrupted with bags full of cash to sign the agreement,” he
16
Confidential interview with Somaliland official in Hargeisa, June 2017.
17
Confidential interview with Somaliland official in Hargeisa, December 2016.
18
For example, the Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency (TİKA) only opened
visible office in Hargeisa in late 2015, four years after entering Mogadishu, despite building and run-
ning schools and other projects since mid-2012.
18
Conclusion
Does the case of Berbera demonstrate that Ethiopia has established an accepted
and uncontested hierarchy in the Horn of Africa? The short answer is no. But
Ethiopia is no longer a rising power unduly constrained by landlockedness. Ber-
bera represents a friendly corridor across the territory of a pliant state for Ethio-
pian markets. Our focus on Ethiopian foreign policy vis-à-vis the wider region
has attempted to address a deficiency in the scant literature on recent geopolitical
developments in the Horn of Africa, particularly in regards to port developments.
As noted, most of these have focused on outside powers and security situations
such as the conflict in Yemen that have the triggered the engagement of external
19
At the time of writing, the road linking the border crossing at Wachale/Wajaale and Hargeisa was in
decent repair. However, the road network heading north and east from Hargeisa to Berbera, particularly
after Burao/Burco, was in need of significant improvement.
19
states. By focusing on Ethiopia and its aims in its near abroad, we attempt to
avoid the all-too-common pitfall whereby African states are deemed as passive
and lacking in agency as they are acted upon by powers or regional blocs outside
the continent (Cannon, 2016b; 57). However, a few caveats are in order. First,
our article pays scant attention to the actions of the ruling cadre and business-
people of the Republic of Somaliland in relation to developments with the port
of Berbera. An analysis of these actions, often in concert with or encouraged
by Addis Ababa, as well as dissatisfaction and anger over the deal within So-
maliland are beyond the scope of this article and represent a potential follow-on
research project. Second, our article largely ignores Ethiopian internal politics,
partially because these are outside the scope of this article and partially because
of a paucity of verifiable data emanating from Ethiopia. Finally, the article’s focus
on Ethiopia and the UAE solely may seem odd given the multiplicity of regional
and international actors operating in Somalia. However, we argue that actors such
as Turkey, the UK, US, Qatar, Italy and Kenya, among others, are clustered in
Mogadishu – far to the south of Somaliland. Their strategic interests are informed
by the political, economic and security dynamics in that theatre and their shifting
relationships with the SFG.20
Somaliland Berbera Port deal. In the process, Ethiopia further bolstered its other
regional security objective: ensuring a divided and weak Somalia. Brilliantly, it did
so by avoiding any overt action which could later be misconstrued in Mogadishu,
the UN or the AU (Staff Report, 2016). Instead, Mogadishu’s ire is directed at
Somaliland and the UAE. In the process, a further fractured and divided Somalia
and a largely isolated Eritrea mean Ethiopia is the undisputed local power bro-
ker in the region; the regional hegemon. As further deals for ports and mineral
rights continue across the northern Somali coast,22 Addis Ababa can potentially
negotiate with Somaliland, the autonomous region of Puntland and the Somali
Federal Government (SFG) all separately – unofficially or officially – depending
on perceived need. Ethiopia has also further cemented its hold over Somaliland.
Towards Hargeisa, Ethiopia has combined pressure with material incentives to
achieve its goals. While Ethiopia was instrumental in bringing in significant out-
side investment and recognition to Somaliland, it also increasingly meddles in in-
ternal affairs. For example, when a delegation from Somaliland was invited to visit
Egypt, Ethiopia reportedly lodged a harsh diplomatic complaint against the visit
to its main Nile River rival and Hargeisa cancelled the visit (Somaliland Informer,
2017). As such, Hargeisa finds itself increasingly emboldened to act as an inde-
pendent actor yet constrained by the need to obtain Addis Ababa’s approval. As
Ethiopia begins to move increasing amounts of goods and services across its bor-
der along Somaliland’s new highway to the refurbished port of Berbera, Hargeisa
may begin to question key aspects of the port deal. Yet one aspect will not be in
question: Ethiopia’s rising power and influence over the entire region.
Bio
Brendon J. Cannon
Dr. Brendon J. Cannon is an Assistant Professor of International Security, De-
partment of Humanities & Social Science at Khalifa University of Science &
Technology (Abu Dhabi, UAE). His academic background includes a Ph.D. in
Political Science (University of Utah, USA) with an emphasis on Comparative
Politics & International Relations and an M.A. in Middle East Studies & His-
tory (University of Utah, USA). Dr. Cannon was previously a director of a univer-
sity research institute in Hargeisa, Somaliland, Somalia and lectured in political
science at Kisii University in Nairobi, Kenya. His research interests include Turk-
ish foreign policy, rising powers in Africa and their foreign policies, the political
economy of energy, offensive and defensive cybersecurity, and the securitization
of post-Ottoman identity politics. Dr. Cannon’s articles include Terrorists, Geo-
politics and Kenya’s Proposed Border Wall with Somalia (2016); Deconstructing Tur-
key’s Efforts in Somalia (2016); and Why Al-Shabaab Attacks Kenya: Questioning the
Narrative Paradigm (2017). His full-length book, Legislating Reality and Politiciz-
22
Dubai’s P&O Ports recently won a 30-year concession to manage the port in Bosasso, 2,000km
north of Mogadishu and in the autonomous region of Puntland. See Anderson (2017).
21
Ash Rossiter
Dr. Ash Rossiter is an Assistant Professor in International Security within the
Department of Humanities & Social Science at Khalifa University of Science
& Technology (Abu Dhabi, UAE). He earned his Ph.D. in 2013 from the Uni-
versity of Exeter’s Institute for Arab and Islamic Studies, following on from an
earlier M.A. degree in War Studies from King’s College London. Between 2014
and 2017, Dr. Rossiter was a research fellow at the University of Exeter within
the College of Social Sciences and International Studies. Dr. Rossiter’s current
research lies at the intersection of technological change and global security with
special regard to the utility of military force international affairs.
References
African Intelligence. (2016, June 3). Terms of Reference for Joint Technical Com-
mittee of Ethio-Berbera Port Utilization and Transit Facilitation. (2016, June
3). Indian Ocean Newsletter.
Al Arabiya. (2015, March 31). Makhaawif yemniya min ‘mugaamira’ Eritrea ti-
harikha Iran [Yemeni fears from Eritrean ‘adventures’ driven by Iran]. Al Ara-
biya. http://www.alarabiya.net/ar/arab-and-world/yemen/2015/03/31
Alwasat. (2015, December 8). Qatar tarseel alfaan min janoodha liqitaal al-
Houtheen fi al-Yemen [Qatar sends a thousand troops to fight the Houthis in
Yemen]. Alwasat. http://www.alwasatnews.com/news/1023715.html
Anderson, R. (2017, April 6). Dubai’s P&O Ports wins 30-year concession in
Somalia’s Puntland. Gulf Business. http://gulfbusiness.com/dubais-po-ports-
wins-30-year-concession-somalias-puntland/
BBC. (2017a, February 13). Somaliland agrees to UAE military base in Berbera.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-38956093
22
BBC. (2017b, September 18). What is behind clashes in Ethiopia’s Oromia and
Somali regions?. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-41278618.
Burke, J. (2016, September 12). Middle East’s leaders cross the Red Sea to woo
east Africa. Guardian.
Buzan, Barry & Ole Wæver (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of Inter-
national Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap De Wilde. (1998). Security: A New Frame-
work for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
CDE. (2016, May 20). TPLF: We’re better off having the UAE investing in Ber-
bera port than in Eritrea. Madote. http://www.madote.com/2016/05/tplf-
were-better-off-having-uae.html
Dalsan Radio Mogadishu. (2017, March 4). Somalia: UAE Envoy Recalled
in Effort to Mend Strained Relation. All Africa. http://allafrica.com/sto-
ries/201703040015.html
Davison, W. (2016, April 4). Ethiopia, Somaliland Sign Accord to Boost Use
of Berbera Port. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti-
cles/2016-04-04/ethiopia-somaliland-sign-accord-to-boost-use-of-berbera-
port
23
Destradi, Sandra. (2010). Regional powers and their strategies: empire, hegemo-
ny, and leadership. Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4.
Embassy of Ethiopia. (2015, April 14). First Ethio-UAE Joint Ministerial Com-
mission Meeting held in Abu Dhabi (Apr 13, 2015). The Embassy of the
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia to Australia. http://www.ethiopi-
anembassy.net/embassy-news/first-ethio-uae-joint-ministerial-commission-
meeting-held-in-abu-dhabi-apr-13-2015/
Faye, M. L., McArthur, J. W., Sachs, J. D., & Snow, T. (2004). The challenges fac-
ing landlocked developing countries. Journal of Human Development, 5(1),
31-68.
Fitch, A. (2014, July 9). Djibouti Files Arbitration against DP World over Al-
leged Corruption in Port Deal. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/
articles/djibouti-files-arbitration-against-dp-world-over-alleged-corruption-
in-port-deal-1404895724
Flemes, Daniel & Detlef Nolte. (2010). Introduction. In Flemes, Daniel (ed.)
Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of
Regional Powers. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1–14.
Frazier, Derrick & Robert Stewart-Ingersoll. (2010). Regional powers and securi-
ty: A framework for understanding order within regional security complexes.
European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 16 Issue. 4, pp.731-753.
Gallup, J. L., Sachs, J. D., & Mellinger, A. D. (1999). Geography and economic
development. International regional science review, 22(2), 179-232.
Gessesse, A. S. (2015, April 11). Ethiopia to trade using regional ports. The East
24
African. http://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/news/Ethiopia-to-trade-using-re-
gional-ports/2558-2682324-11idtdp/index.html
Giorgis, Tamrat. (2008, July 15). Ethiopia at the mercy of tiny Djibouti. Addis
Fortune.
Glassner, Martin. (2003). Access to the sea for developing land-locked states.
Springer Science & Business Media.
GSN. (2016, October 20). UAE: Airbase planned in Somaliland. Gulf States
News. http://archive.crossborderinformation.com/Article/UAE+Airbase+pla
nned+in+Somaliland.aspx?date=20161020&docNo=2&qid=1&from=Search.
aspx#
Hokayem, E., & Roberts, D. B. (2016). The War in Yemen. Survival, 58(6), 157-
186.
Humphrey, J. & H. Schmitz. (2002). How does insertion in Global Value Chains
affect upgrading in industrial clusters?. Regional Studies, 36 (9).
Jacobs, Wouter; Cesar Ducruet and Peter De Langen (2010). Integrating World
Cities into Production Networks: the Case of Port Cities. Global Networks,
Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 97.
JOC. (2017, May 15). Ethiopia gains access to Berbera Port. JOC. https://www.
joc.com/port-news/terminal-operators/dp-world/ethiopia-gains-access-ber-
bera-port_20170515.html
Johnson, M. C., & Smaker, M. (2014). State building in de facto states: Somalil-
and and Puntland compared. Africa Today, 60(4), 3-23.
25
Katzman, Kenneth. (2017, August 18). The United Arab Emirates (UAE): Is-
sues for U.S. Policy. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/
mideast/RS21852.pdf
Kerr, S. & Aglionby, J. (2017, February 21). DP World wins tribunal case
against Djibouti over bribe case. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/
content/9bca1468-f837-11e6-9516-2d969e0d3b65
Knights, M., & Mello, A. (2015). The Saudi-UAE War Effort in Yemen (Part 1):
Operation Golden Arrow in Aden. The Washington Institute, Policywatch,
2464(10).
Lefebvre, J.A. (2012, Summer). Iran in the Horn of Africa: Outflanking U.S. Al-
lies. Middle East Policy, Vol. XIX, No. 2.
Lemke, Douglas (2002). Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge/New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
Menkhaus, K. (2013). Somalia: State collapse and the threat of terrorism (No.
364). Routledge.
National Staff. (2017a, February 12). 10 Important Things you need to know
about the Somaliland-UAE Military Base Deal. The National- Somaliland.
http://www.thenational-somaliland.com/2017/02/12/10-things-need-know-
somaliland-uae-military-base-deal/
National Staff. (2017b, May 18). Somaliland’s Foreign Minister discusses Ethio-
pia’s 19% Share in Berbera Port Deal. The National-Somaliland. http://www.
thenational-somaliland.com/2017/05/18/somalilands-foreign-minister-dis-
cusses-ethiopias-19-share-berbera-port-deal/
Nolte, Detlef. (2010). How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and
research topics. Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, Issue 4, pp.881-901.
26
Pollack, Nadav & Michael Knights. (2016, March 25). Gulf Coalition Operations
in Yemen (Part 3): Maritime and Aerial Blockade. Policywatch 2596. Wash-
ington Institute for Near East Studies.
Port Strategy. (2011, September 14). The Berbera option. Port Strategy. http://
www.portstrategy.com/news101/insight-and-opinion/post-script/The-Ber-
bera-option
Press. TV. (2017, February 15). Somalia ‘plans to file legal complaint against UAE’
over Somaliland base. http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2017/02/15/510655/So-
malia-UAE-military-base-Somaliland-Nur-Jimale-Farah-Berbera-Yemeni-
conflict
Reuters Staff. (2015a, December 29). Kuwait to Send Troops to Saudi Arabia to
Fight Yemen Rebels – Newspaper. Reuters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-
kuwait-yemen-security-idUKKBN0UC0I520151229
Reuters Staff. (2015b, October 10). Ethiopia blames foreign hands for stoking un-
rest. Reuters. http://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/idAFL8N1C-
G1TL
Richards, S., & Bekele, G. (2011). Conflict in the Somali Region of Ethiopia:
Can Education Promote Peace-Building. Tufts University: Feinstein Inter-
national Center.
Solomon, S. (2016, January 9). Observers See Several Motives for Eritrean In-
volvement in Yemen. VOA. https://www.voanews.com/a/observers-see-sev-
eral-motives-eritrean-involvement-yemen/3138689.html
Somaliland Informer. (2017, January 28). Who is opposing the UAE military
base in Berbera and why? Somaliland Informer. http://www.somalilandin-
former.com/somaliland/who-is-opposing-the-uae-military-base-in-berbera-
and-why/
Staff Report. (2016, September 5). DP World wins concession to manage Red Sea
port of Berbera. Gulf News. http://gulfnews.com/business/sectors/shipping/
27
dp-world-wins-concession-to-manage-red-sea-port-of-berbera-1.1891468
Stevis, Matina & Asa Fitch. (2016, May 30). Dubai’s DP World Agrees to Man-
age Port in Somaliland for 30 Years. Wall Street Journal, http://www.wsj.
com/articles/dubais-dp-world-agrees-to-manage-port-in-somaliland-for-
30-years-1464549937
Styan, David. (2013, April). Djibouti: Changing Influence in the Horn’s Strategic
Hub. Chatham House Briefing Paper.
The Economist. (2008, March 19). St Tropez in the Horn? A Tiny Country
Makes the Best of Bad Neighbourhood,” The Economist. http://www.econo-
mist.com/node/10881652
WAM. (2013, March 22). Ethiopia welcomes stronger ties with UAE. Gulf
News. http://gulfnews.com/news/uae/government/ethiopia-welcomes-stron-
ger-ties-with-uae-1.1161671
WAM. (2015, April 13). Abdullah bin Zayed meets Ethiopia’s FM, chairs UAE-
Ethiopian Joint Committee meeting. Emirates News Agency (WAM). http://
wam.ae/en/details/1395279184580
World Bank. (2017, April 24). The World Bank in Ethiopia. http://www.world-
bank.org/en/country/ethiopia/overview. Ethiopia GDP Annual Growth
Rate: 1981-2017. Trading Economics. https://tradingeconomics.com/ethio-
pia/gdp-growth-annual
Yihun, B. B. (2014). Ethiopian foreign policy and the Ogaden War: the shift
from “containment” to “destabilization,” 1977–1991. Journal of Eastern Afri-
28
29