Steam Distribution and Primary Equipment Index: Index Pg1 Biography Pg2 Preface Pg2 Conclusion - Final Thought PG 37
Steam Distribution and Primary Equipment Index: Index Pg1 Biography Pg2 Preface Pg2 Conclusion - Final Thought PG 37
INDEX Pg 1
BIOGRAPHY Pg 2
PREFACE Pg 2
Index
PREFACE
In our prior eBook, “Boiler Plant Operations and Tips”, we discussed steam boilers,
how to achieve maximum efficiencies, and related boiler room equipment. In this
eBook, we will discuss steam systems and the equipment that makes up an efficient,
functioning system. As we discussed, a steam system consists of a steam-supply/boiler
facility, a condensate return system, and lastly a steam-using facility with various steam
applications. In this eBook on systems and related equipment, our discussion will be
focused on the integration of various types of equipment that lies within a steam
system. Our years of experience have allowed us to identify major issues with
equipment and the selection and design of a system, which will hopefully allow you to
develop some guidelines to avoid equipment pitfalls - thus unnecessary expense and
downtime. Some of our suggestions will revolve around modifying existing systems and
other considerations that may apply to the design of a new system.
Chapter 1- What is a Steam System
Chapter 1 Highlights – In our EBook entitled “Boiler Plant Operations and Tips”
we covered the basics of steam, definitions, terms, boilers and steam production.
A review of that EBook might be helpful to get you up to speed with the basics of
steam and its production.
In our EBook entitled “Boiler Plant Operations and Tips” we covered the basics of
steam, definitions, terms, boilers and steam production. A review of chapter 1 of that
EBook might be helpful to get you up to speed with the basics of steam and its
production. Highlights of that first chapter include –
Thermal energy (heat) is hard to measure other than something is hot or cold.
The measurement decided on was the British Thermal Unit (BTU), which was
defined as the amount of energy to raise the temperature of one pound of water
one degree Fahrenheit.
With our steam heat transfer media let us examine the BTU, and the many
sources of a BTU by burning a substance, from a great chart from the website
Engineering Tool Box.
The most common device used to produce steam is a boiler, which burns a fuel,
which in turn boils water under pressure to produce steam. Stationary boilers
powered industry and ships while movable boilers became steam locomotives.
About 25% of all fuel consumed is used to make steam.
Over a wide range of pressure, the Total Enthalpy remains for a pound of steam
about 1200 Btu’s per pound, but as the pressure increases, along with the
temperature, the amount of energy to boil a pound of water decreases. Stated in
a few words, as the temperature rises the amount of energy in a pound of steam
goes down!
Thermal energy (heat) flows from hot to cold. The amount of heat which will flow
depends on the materials and other factors, but the temperature difference is a
major issue. As a general rule of thumb this temperature difference should be
about 50° F. As an example, if we wish to heat something to 290° F, we should
have steam at a temperature of about 340° F (290° F + 50° F). Steam at 100 psig
has a temperature of 338° F-close enough.
With that introduction let me define the sub systems which make up steam systems:
The Boiler Plant conditions feedwater, which is fed to boilers to produce steam
for use in a facility. For most steam systems, condensate is returned to the boiler
plant to be re-used to produce more steam.
The Steam Distribution System includes all of the piping and valves to route the
steam in your facility for consumption. It typically also might contain flow meters,
pressure reducing valves, and other equipment to monitor the status and
condition of the distribution system. The boiler plant typically represents the
largest capital investment. In many cases, in large steam systems, the
distribution system also represents a significant capital investment. Steam is
typically distributed at higher pressures to reduce pipe sizes and then reduced in
pressure at the point of use.
The Equipment Consumption Systems are used to convert the energy dollars
spent to produce steam to production dollars. The variety and types of
applications for using steam is widespread.
The Condensate Return System gathers the spent steam, which is hot
conditioned water (condensate), and returns it to the boiler plant to make more
steam.
Without steam many of the items we take for granted would be difficult or impossible to
produce. A short list of major steam uses include-
Refineries producing gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil and other related products
Chemical plants producing a wide array of products
The medical industry
The food industry
The pulp and paper industry
I could continue this list for a significant number of pages. To better understand how
widespread the use of steam is, take a moment right now and take a quick 360 degree
scan around yourself. I would venture a safe guess that most everything you looked at
that was manufactured had contact with steam at some point. Stated in another way,
thermal energy (heat) is a key component to most every element of everyday living, and
steam is the most common source of this thermal energy. As you ponder that point, in
all probability the electricity powering the device you are reading this EBook on was
produced by steam!
The US Department of Energy has a great website covering many facets of a steam
system and is a great source of information. Visit it at
www.energy.gov/eere/amo/steam-systems
There has been much written about steam over the past few hundred years. This
information is in widespread use, so my challenge is to distill all the information in a
quick format you can use to solve problems in your steam system. This will help
improve efficiency, improve production, and improve your knowledge of steam.
If you search “Steam Systems” you will bring up many pages of search results which, in
most cases, are provided by manufacturers of steam products. As with any industry,
each manufacturer offers what they feel are the best products with many unique
features. Sorting all this out can be overwhelming, so I will try my best to stay above
that fray and share with you what I’ve learned in designing, working with, trouble
shooting, and, in general, improving steam systems.
A steam system has to be approached from both an engineering and practical point of
view. An analogy (maybe a poor one) is a steam system is like cooking - follow the
recipe but flavor it to suit yourself with the ingredients. In many portions of this book we
will look at both engineering based solutions as well as using rules of thumb handed
down over the past few hundred years.
Clean means steam which is free of gases such as carbon dioxide, oxygen and
other gas which can combine to contaminate the steam. Primarily the deaerator,
water softener, and chemicals added in the boiler room should remove gas
contaminants.
Clean also means free of physical contaminants such as rust, welding slag, mud,
pipe dope, and teflon tape. Most of these contaminants tend to enter the piping
system during construction and doing a major blow down before starting any new
system or system addition can minimize a lot of later headaches. In over 50
years of being around steam systems, the most notable contaminant was a pair
of coveralls left in a 10” steam line!
Dry means no entrained moisture and is typically called steam quality, which is
defined as the amount of moisture present in the steam. Steam with a quality of
100% is considered to be all water in vapor form with no entrained moisture.
Most boilers will produce steam at about 98% quality which is considered dry
steam.
Low steam quality (under 90%) can create major problems in both the steam distribution
system as well as steam consuming equipment. Steam quality is measured with a
calorimeter, which is a laboratory piece of equipment that is difficult to obtain and is
expensive. A simple test taught to me long ago by an old timer was to take a piece of
card board such as a box end and use it as a blow off target. Find a small blow valve
and open it in a safe manner to blow to atmosphere. You should see a small of amount
of condensate for a second or two followed by a pale blue vapor which should be clear
for about ¼” to ½” right at the tip of the blow off point. Check with a flash light passing
light through this point to make sure it is clear. Take your card board target and flick
through the blow off and then quickly run it with your hand. It should be warm and dry. If
it is wet to any degree, your steam quality is an issue which can cause you serious
problems with potential water hammer, corrosion, and loss of production. Low steam
quality is a real problem which should not be ignored.
Causes of low steam quality can start in your boiler room. Run the same visual and card
board test at each boiler, if possible, and on the main steam header supplying steam to
the plant. If it is wet, then probable causes could be one or more of the following:
If your boiler plant steam is dry and of high quality, the steam distribution system may
be lowering the quality. Do the card board test at a number of points starting with the
main steam supply header in the boiler room. If it becomes wetter as you move away
from the boiler plant, then your distribution system might be the cause of your problem.
Some points to exam in your distribution system are:
If wet steam continues to remain a problem, then adding a separator in the boiler plant
or on selected primary and secondary lines is an option. Before adding a separator,
trace all steam lines and make sure all steam drip traps are operating properly, then
carefully review the piping to ensure that condensate is not being retained in pockets,
sagging piping, or closed manual or automatic control valves.
From Swagelok Energy Advisors, Inc.:
Steam separators are rarely required when a steam system is properly designed,
specified, installed, operated, and maintained. The “ideal” steam system that doesn’t
require a steam separator will have the following:
3. Insulated steam lines and components, with the insulation being 95% efficient
5. Proper standard operating procedures in use throughout the plant, where properly
sized steam lines may operate like a gravity separator. Here, proper steam velocities
will allow the moisture to drop out of the steam vapor to the bottom of the pipe, where a
functional drip leg steam trap station will remove it.
There are cases where proper steam system design parameters and procedures are
not followed and the steam has moisture entrainment. Here, a separation device needs
to be installed because the presence of water in steam can, and will, cause problems,
including:
1. Wiredrawing
2. Corrosion
5. Reduced efficiency
6. Lower productivity because all steam separators produce a pressure drop across the
device. The design of the separator determines the amount of pressure drop that occurs
in the steam line. Therefore, a steam separator should only be used where necessary
because a pressure drop in the steam system can affect efficiency and end user
performance.”
Ensuring that your steam consuming equipment is operating at peak efficiency involves
operating a boiler plant that delivers clean dry steam and a distribution system that
maintains that same level of clean dry stream.
Isolation Valves
By numbers installed, isolation valves are the most common item used. Improper
application of isolation valves can create maintenance headaches and in some cases
lead to significant safety issues. Typically, materials of construction for steam valve
bodies include brass, bronze, cast iron, cast and forged steel and various grades of
stainless steel. All valves will carry two pressure and temperature design limits –
WOG stands for the Water, Oil, and Gas pressure rating for a valve. It is the
maximum operating pressure for a valve at 100°F. Call it the maximum cold
operating pressure with cold being defined at 100°F.
SWP stands for the Steam Working Pressure rating of a valve. It will state a
maximum working pressure at a temperature. As an example, a cast iron valve
might carry a typical rating of 250 psig steam pressure at a maximum
temperature of 450° F. Call SWP the hot working pressure.
WOG and SWP define the characteristics of the valve from a materials point of view.
The actual range of pressures and temperatures in installing the valve are also a
function of the connection style. Typically valves in the ¼” to 2” range are either
threaded or socket weld and will carry the same rating as marked on the valve. Flanged
valves are typically used in steam systems 2 ½” and larger. Although as an example a
cast iron valve would typically carry a SWP of 250 psig at 450°F. The rating of the valve
flange will limit the maximum installed pressure for the valve. Cast iron valves are rated
125 and 250 psig.
From the Engineering Tool Box website here is a portion of a typical flange rating chart:
For the complete set of charts see http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/flanges-bolts-
dimensions-d_464.html
As a side note, typical steam operating pressures for many facilities are in the 100-200
psig range. A 125 psig cast iron flange will interchange with a 150 psig cast steel flange
and a 250 psig cast iron flange will do the same with a 300 psig cast steel flange.
On/Off valves include all gate valves and most ¼ turn valves such as ball valves
and butterfly valves. On/off valves are not designed to throttle steam flows due to
their quick open characteristics and will also be damaged if left in a throttling
position for more than a short time.
Modulating valves are globe valves in style with a plug or valve head which
retracts from a seat. Offered in varying styles, globe valves should be used if you
plan to manually throttle steam flows.
https://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/waterops/redesign/TablesNFormulas/Pages/v
alvebasicsandselectiontips.htm
A wide variety of companies in many countries produce all types of isolation valves. For
steam service, you would be wise to stay with proven manufacturers with a long term
track record and avoid bargain valves at low prices which could fail when you most
need a valve to close properly. If the prices are in the “too good to be true range” then
beware.
Check Valves
Check valves are widely used in steam systems and quite frankly misapplied in many
cases. There is no universal check valve so the application details become important in
selecting the proper type of check valve for your application. Failed check valves can
cause all kinds of problems including water hammer, which can cause a major failure in
your steam and condensate return systems. Check valves come in a number of different
styles:
A swing check valve, or tilting disc check valve, is a check valve in which the
disc, the movable part to block the flow, swings on a hinge. Swing check valves
in steam systems are not a wise choice since the hinge point is typically a failure
point due to activity, stress and thermal shock which can occur in a steam
system. Most stream traps require a check valve on the discharge side. Swing
check valves are a very poor choice for this application which typically can go
undetected if the hinge point fails and the flapper remains in line creating
problems in both the steam side of the check valve as well as the condensate
return side of the valve. Stated again, based on my past experience, I would
avoid swing check valves in steam and condensate return systems.
A ball check valve is a check valve in which the closing member, the movable
part to block the flow, is a spherical ball. In some ball check valves, the ball is
spring-loaded to help keep it shut. Ball checks are most typically used as vacuum
breakers in steam systems and are well suited for this application. Due to lower
capacities, they are not suggested for other steam and condensate return
applications.
Piston check valves use a spring loaded piston in a cylinder to provide both a
positive shut off and also minimize slamming in the check valve when pressure
pulses occur. They provide good service on the discharge side of steam traps
and condensate pumps. Piston check valves should be installed in a horizontal
orientation.
Spring loaded wafer check valves provide an excellent solution for any
application in a steam or condensate return system. Durabla is considered the
control valve of check valves, the “Check Valve Doctor”. Durabla Fluid
Technology specializes in spring assisted in-line check valves that prevent water
hammer and reverse flow and ensure long life if properly sized for the flow and
not the line size. Due to the spring assist and short travel distance of the disc, by
the time forward velocity has decreased to zero, the valve disc has reached the
seat and the valve is closed.
Check valves in steam and condensate return systems should be installed in the
following applications –
On the discharge side of all steam traps except disc, thermodynamic and similar
style traps which use a coin sized disc to provide operation of the trap. Disc traps
are check valves by nature so installing a check valve on the downstream side
will result in having two check valves in series; one being the disc trap and the
second being the check valve you added. I can 99.99% guarantee you will have
flooded and major equipment problems on the steam side of the system. For all
other traps use a piston check or better yet a spring loaded wafer check such as
a Durabla check valve. Some trap manufacturers offer a built in check valve
option for portions of their product line.
Check valves are not required on steam traps discharging through a single line to
atmosphere.
On the discharge side of all steam and motor driven condensate return pumps,
spring loaded wafer checks are your best option for this application to eliminate
slamming problems with the pumps.
Use as vacuum breakers on systems where vacuum can occur when the steam
supply is shut off, which would create flooding of the equipment due to negative
pressures as the steam condenses. Spring loaded or wafer check valves work
best for this application and some companies offer wafer or ball check valves
designed and marketed for vacuum breaker service.
Applications where steam is direct injected or sparged into vessels filled with
water or other fluids to prevent reverse flow back into the steam line when supply
or control valves shut down.
Other specialized equipment or skids for specific applications using steam.
Carefully review the suggestions of steam supply and condensate return piping.
Steam systems which work well are a very efficient way to provide large amounts of
thermal energy to equipment. Improperly sized check valves can create many problems
so selecting the proper check valve from a reliable vendor can save you a lot of grief
and downtime.
Strainers
Steam systems, both new and old, tend to collect debris and other “junk”, which due to
system velocities will migrate toward the end points of each main and branch pipe run.
In most steam control equipment and steam traps, orifices are prone to being blocked
when this debris encounters the small opening leading to failure, downtime and lost
production.
You might find it odd that we will devote comments and suggestions on this simple
device. Strainers come into two basic styles:
Wye Strainer with an example shown above on the left. Installation of a drain
valve is suggested with a pipe plug located on the discharge side for safety.
Blowing down a wye strainer may not always remove dirt and chemicals which
can block the strainer screen and might require wire brushing or even screen
replacement if is really plugged up. Wye strainers installed in situations where
they are subject to freezing should be installed upside down to avoid a
condensate pocket, or installed with a drainer valve for use when the system is
shut down.
Basket strainers, as shown on the right, are sometimes used in steam systems
and the same general comments regarding wye strainers apply to basket
strainers. Use a bolted cover and not a clamp cover due to steam system
pressure and the dangers of water hammer which will typically cause a clamped
basket strainer to blow the cover.
Screen sizes for steam must be smaller than openings for a strainer used on water.
Most manufacturers offer water and steam screens so make sure you use the steam
screen which has smaller openings. Typical screen sizes for steam are 1/32” (~ 20
mesh) or 1/64” (~ 100 mesh).
Strainers are sold at many price points in our global economy so be an informed buyer
on the source of your strainers and proceed with caution on unknown and questionable
brands.
Pressure gauges come in a wide range of sizes, accuracy, and price points with many
options available.
I would suggest for most of your steam system applications you consider a gauge with
the following specifications:
Pressure gauges are your first tool to trouble shoot a steam system, so having proper
gauges in key locations is really important.
Thermometers are a second critical tool for steam systems. Since the steam pressure
will determine the steam temperature, installing thermometers in most applications is of
no real value. Many steam applications involve heating a fluid, gas, or other materials
from one temperature to a higher temperature. Thermometers become important when
troubleshooting steam heated process systems. They can help identify issues that
require further examination. Thermometers come in both liquid filled as well as
bimetallic dial style. Some suggestions include:
Bimetallic gauges are easier to read and less prone to damage and breakage.
Common dial faces are 3” and 5” with the larger face being easier to read.
Stems are offered in back and bottom connected versions. They are also offered
in every angle styles where the dial face can be adjusted after installation for the
best readability.
Select a range which is about 50% of your expected reading for best accuracy. If
your expected reading is 100°F, a common range for this application would be
30-240°F.
Select a bulb or stem length which will be of the proper length to secure a good
reading. For many applications, the temperature will vary quite a bit depending
on the measuring location. If in doubt, installing an additional thermometer might
be of help.
Thermowells are suggested since they allow for easy replacement of the
defective thermometer. Always put well paste in the stem to insure good contact
between the stem and inside wall of the well.
If permitted, mark normal readings on the dial face for quick confirmation that
proper temperatures are being achieved.
Infrared guns are inexpensive and a great tool for checking so many issues in a steam
system. On any trouble shooting visit I make, I always carry an infrared gun. A few
points to help you get best results include:
Infrared guns will give best results reading off a black surface. Readings from
reflective surfaces such as stainless steel will not be accurate. A black magic
marker can be used to temporarily darken the surface.
Infrared guns are sort of a flashlight in the sense that the beam opens up with
distance. Get as close as possible to the point you wish to read.
An infrared gun with a laser is suggested so you know the point you are reading.
Get an illuminated dial face since steam systems and dark places seem to go
hand-in-hand.
When reading from any metal surface, expect the reading you get to be about 5-
10° F lower than inside the pipe or vessel.
A control valve is any valve which can modulate steam flow based on some input signal.
The input signal can be:
0% 3 psig 4 mA
25% 6 psig 8 mA
50% 9 psig 12 mA
75% 12 psig 16 mA
100% 15 psig 20 mA
Electric operators can also be used to stroke a valve. These are typically
operated by a servo motor or in some cases a small hydraulic pump. Typically,
electric operators offer less stroking force for a given size, tend to be more
expensive, less forgiving of harsh environments, and somewhat more prone to
not be able to withstand high temperatures.
One of the most common applications for control valves in a steam system is to reduce
pressure. They are commonly referred to as PRV’s (pressure reducing valves). We will
examine PRV’s in detail, which will allow us to examine other types of control valves in
a quick overview manner, since the basic styles of PRV’s can be adapted to operate
using other input signals such as temperature, flow, level and humidity.
𝑃 =𝐹 ÷𝐴
For English system force is measured in pounds and area in square inches. As an
example a force of 1000 pounds exerted over an area of 10 square inches would equal
a pressure of 100 PSI (pounds per square inch):
Using our same example, a pressure of 100 PSI acting on an area of 10 square inches
would result in a force of 1000 pounds:
Direct operated PRV’s of all three types are typically offered in sizes ½” through 2” with
limited capacities. The directed operated PRV can be coupled with a larger valve with
the pilot (a direct operated PRV) being the “brains” and the main valve being the
“brawn”.
In this photo, the four smaller PRV’s on the bottom are direct operated and by adapting
them to a main valve, as shown by the larger valves on the top, can provide much
higher capacities. Note that the same basic principle can be used to produce a direct
operated temperature regulator using a bellows coupled to a thermal sensing system
which allows a fluid to expand as it is heated, increasing internal forces on a valve shaft
to open and close a valve based on temperature difference.
From Plant Engineering Magazine here is a great article to set-up and design for a
steam-pressure-reducing valve station.
http://www.plantengineering.com/single-article/set-up-and-design-for-a-steam-pressure-
reducing-valve-station/f2a97efd6dd70ea0222234b4a98135ec.html
Direct and pilot operated steam control valves are offered by many companies such as
Armstrong International, Fisher, Leslie, Spence, Spirax Sarco, Watson McDaniel and
numerous other companies. Most offer pressure, temperature, electric on/off and air
operated pilots for a wide variety of applications. Accuracy will vary by manufacturer so
consult the literature for specifications. Expect on direct operated pressure reducing
valves accuracy at the set point will be ~ +/- 3-4 psig and for pilot operated valves ~ +/-
1-2 psig. For temperature control valves expect ~ +/- 3-4°F.
If greater accuracy is required, or your control signal range is beyond pressure and
temperature, then an air operated or electrically actuated valve should be considered. A
wide variety of electrical and electronic sensors are offered to provide a signal for
pressure, temperature, flow, level, humidity and many other variables. The control
signal can be transmitted to a single loop controller or more sophisticated PLC or
computer based control system. These will provide a signal for the air or electrically
actuated control valve. A very common analog signal is a 4-20 mA signal from the
electronic controller, PLC or computer based control device.
Single loop controllers are low in cost and provide a versatile way to provide control
signals for air or electrically operated controllers. Common sizes range from 1/16 to 1/4
DIN, with the primary difference being the size of the display.
Controllers are offered in a wide range of inputs from RTD, thermocouple, dry contact to
4-20 mA as well as many options including single and multiple alarm functions. A wide
range of output signals are offered with 4-20 mA being the most common for control
valve applications. For air operated valves, adding an I/P transducer will convert the 4-
20 mA signal to the most commonly used 3-15 psig air pressure. An example is shown
for a more complex system for a pasteurizer using two controllers.
For more complex control systems, a PC or PLC based system offers greater flexibility
with increasing cost and complexity.
Eng-Tips website has a forum covering this topic and reading through this forum might
give you an idea of the pro’s and con’s in selecting the right actuator for your control
valve.
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=323523
For most process applications utilizing an air operated control valve and adding a
positioner is a good choice to improve the accuracy and control characteristics of the
valve. The positioner senses the stem position and provides whatever air pressure is
necessary for the stem position to equal what the control signal position demands. A
positioner doesn't know what pressure it provides (it has no pressure sensing), it knows
only the position of the stem (feedback) and the stem position the control signal is
asking for. The internal pneumatics is designed to make the feedback position equal to
the control signal 'position'.
Control valves are a textbook topic and I’ve become a real fan of the website
Engineering Toolbox.com which provides good information in a concise manner. For
more information visit http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/control-valves-t_45.html
http://www.enggcyclopedia.com/2011/06/difference-safety-valve-relief-valve/
“'Pressure Safety Valve” and “Pressure Relief Valve” are commonly used terms to
identify pressure relief devices on a vessel. Frequently, these terms are used
interchangeably, and it depends on a particular project or company standard to identify
all the pressure relief devices either as “safety valves” or as “relief valves” or sometimes
even as “safety relief valves”.
Although freely used interchangeably, these terms differ in the following aspect:
Pressure Relief Valve - is the term used to describe a relief device on a liquid filled
vessel. For such a valve, the opening is proportional to increase in the vessel pressure.
Hence, the opening of valve is not sudden, but gradual if the pressure is increased
gradually.
Pressure Safety Valve - is the term used to describe a relief device on a compressible
fluid or gas filled vessel. For such a valve the opening is sudden. When the set pressure
of the valve is reached, the valve opens almost fully.
Safety valves for steam can be set to meet one of three requirements.
V Stamp which applies to all ASME Section I valves installed on boilers operating at a
pressure greater than 15 psig.
HV stamp which applies to all ASME Section IV valves installed on boilers operating at
15 psig or less.
UV stamp which applies to all ASME Section VIII valves installed on unfired steam
using equipment.
For boilers ( Section I) above 15 psig, valves must be sized on capacity tables which
reflect a 3% accumulation. Boilers operating at 15 psig or less (Section HV), safety
valves must be set no higher than 5 psig above the boiler pressure.
Accumulation is the amount of pressure change in percent of set pressure required for
the valve to go to full capacity.
I would suggest that all steam safety valves be vented outside even if this is not a local
code requirement. Steam in a confined space is very dangerous and when combined
with electrical panels even more dangerous.
http://www.control-specialties.com/admin/uploads/safety_valve_final.pdf
Safety and relief valves are designed to protect equipment from over pressurization and
failure. Some tips to ensure safe operation are as follows:
1. Before installing the valve, protect it from shock and prevent dirt from getting inside
the valve.
2. Mount the valve in a vertical position so that the valve body is self-draining. Do not
plug any bonnet vent openings.
3. Inlet piping should be as short as possible with no elbows and equal to or greater
than the inlet size of the valves.
4. Discharge piping should be self-draining or use a drip pan elbow. Make sure the
discharge piping contains no pressure.
5. Do not support discharge piping using the safety valve as the means of support.
6. For threaded valves, use small amounts of thread sealant to ensure that the sealant
does not enter the valve and create leakage problems.
7. Maintain system pressure at least 5 psig or 10% below the set pressure of the valve,
whichever is greater.
http://www.control-
specialties.com/admin/uploads/kunkle_installation_operating_instructions.pdf
There is a misconception that there is a LAW requiring safety valves be repaired or re-
certified every year. Safety valve maintenance is typically mandated by company policy,
your insurance inspector or by the state inspectors. Whatever the guidance, if a safety
valve fails, the end result could cost you much more than any inspection program!
A steam trap, in a simple definition, is an automatic valve which will vent non-
condensables and condensate from a piece of steam consuming equipment and stop
the loss of live steam as it enters the steam trap. Steam traps started to appear in use
about 1900 and replaced the prior device which was typically a pinched piece of tubing
or a cracked valve adjusted by a pipefitter. As you can imagine, this approach was
neither efficient, effective, nor cost effective. Steam trap development started with float
or bucket operated valves and then evolved into many other types.
Service, and therefore service life, on a steam trap can become demanding since it is
the interface device which separates the steam side from the condensate return side of
a steam system. Pressure and temperatures can be high, which when combined with
condensate, flashes as it enters and discharges to the return system. All steam traps fail
so the question is not “if” but “when”. Typically traps operating in the 100-150 psig
range, if properly sized and selected, will last 5-7 years - your results will vary quite a
bit. Imagine a facility with 100 steam traps which has been in operation for many years.
If the average service life of all traps is say 5 years, then we can expect failures to be
about 20% per year or 20 bad traps per year. If the average life is 2 years, then 50%
per year will fail and 10 years average life would forecast 10 failures per year.
Why then so much attention on a steam trap? A bit of math might help. Many traps
operate 24/7 which works out to 720 hours in a 30 day month and 8,760 hours per year.
If a failed trap blows $1.00 per hour of live steam, then it is costing you $720 per month
and $8,760 per year.
As a rule of thumb, a trap which fails will blow about 10% of its condensate capacity in
live steam. Actual results will vary on the trap type and operating conditions but this is a
reasonable place to start. A typical ½” trap at 100 psig will have a capacity of about
1,000 lb/hr of condensate so open failure of the trap will result in the loss of about 100
lb/hr of live steam. If your steam cost per 1,000 lbs is $10.00, then your loss will be
$720 per month. If you add the cost of a ½” trap with the labor to install it, you might
spend $720.00, I suspect a bit less. Payback on finding and replacing failed steam traps
is about one month. Not many items in a facility will payback in savings in a month or
so. Knowing your steam trap population and keeping them in good order is not low fruit-
it is fruit on the ground.
If we take all the steam traps made worldwide in every form and type, we can sort them
into two broad categories:
Blast traps are either open or closed. As they sense the presence of condensate,
they go through a reaction sequence, open and discharge and then close again
to begin the reaction sequence.
Modulating traps, as the name suggests, discharge anytime condensate is
present and adjusts typically by a float mechanism with a discharge rate to match
the condensing rate. All float traps and thermostatic traps and few types of
thermostatic traps are modulating traps. All other steam traps by default are blast
traps.
One other “steam trap” type bears very important mention - orifice traps or other names
used to describe a device with a fixed hole or orifice. I’ll open with a simple comment -
they do not meet the definition of a steam trap starting with the word “automatic”. Orifice
traps come and go in spans of 5-10 years. The sales pitch is simple - size an orifice to
match the condensing rate of the piece of equipment or application to be drained.
Simple - NO.
Assume that you manage to calculate with high degree of precision that the condensing
rate for a piece of equipment is say 899 lb/hr. Assuming the condensing rate never
changes along with the supply and return system also that never changes, you are good
to go with a fixed orifice. The problem in the real world is that they will change. If the
rate rises about 899 lb/hr, then you back up condensate in your equipment and if it
drops below 899 lb/hr, then they will blow live steam.
Orifice traps do have a valid application on closed loop systems which condenses all
the flash and live steam to be fed back to the boiler. This situation occurs in some
steam powered ships and in some cases large power generation plants. If this is not
your application, I would suggest you steer clear of orifice traps to avoid a lot of issues
and potential damage to your steam system.
Volumes have been written on steam trap operating types. We’ll go with the very short
version and you can further explore on the web if desired.
Float and Thermostatic Traps use a ball float mechanism in the form of an
internal level control which opens when condensate enters the trap. A
thermostatic balance pressure air vent which follows about 15° F below the
saturation curve, vents air and non-condensables.
Thermostatic traps utilize a bellows filled with a volatile fluid which has a higher
pressure at any boiling point that expands the bellows and closes the trap. The
internal fill fluid is selected to follow the saturation curve over a wide range of
pressures. Bimetallic elements can also be stacked to provide them to follow the
saturation curve. Thermostatic traps will vent large amounts of air and non-
condensables on both start-up and during operation which can be important in
some applications. The same element concept is the thermostatic part of the float
and thermostatic trap which in reality is two traps in one body.
I’ve included a cut away of an orifice trap to make the list but will again state I do
not consider it to be a true steam trap since it fails the automatic part of sensing
condensate and steam to provide proper operation. If you use this type of device,
proceed with great caution, understanding that in most cases you will either back
up condensate in your equipment or blow live steam. Neither mode of operation
is a wise choice.
Two companies with a long track record in the R&D, manufacture and distribute steam
traps are Armstrong International and Spirax Sarco. In my earlier years, I worked for
both companies and can attest to sound R&D, manufacturing and reliable products.
Both companies account for over 50% of worldwide trap sales. Many other companies,
both regional and worldwide, also manufacture excellent products so be an informed
buyer. Buyer beware that the lowest cost steam trap could become a very expensive
waste of money if it does not perform well due to poor design, sub-standard materials,
short cuts in the manufacturing process and poor product support. Being an informed
buyer is my best advice.
From my personal experience I would rank overall performance of steam traps in the
following list of best operational features:
1. Float and Thermostatic traps provide the best performance features with
modulating discharge and high air venting capabilities. They are more expensive
than other choices, subject to freezing if not properly protected; the float is
vulnerable to water hammer and in some versions, a bit complicated if the piping
is not inline design. For applications where a control valve modulates the steam
flow, they remain the best choice.
2. Inverted bucket traps can be a close second in many applications and although
they don’t modulate like an F&T, they will, if properly sized and applied, respond
quickly to load changes. They are also offered in smaller physical dimensions
and pipe sizes and in versions which will deal with freezing situations. Without an
optional air vent they will be slow to vent gases.
3. Thermodynamic disc traps work well in small to mid-range capacity applications
where on/off operation is not an issue and a small compact size is important. All
models will operate over a wide range of pressures providing storeroom
reductions in inventory if your facility uses a lot of traps on varying pressures.
Properly installed they can be made to be freeze proof.
4. Thermostatic traps are popular in many parts of the world and could in reality
enter this list in position 2 or 3 if properly selected and sized. Something had to
be 4 in my list and thermostatic traps wound up in this position by default.
5. Orifice traps based on my 50+ years should not be on any list for the reason
previously listed.
The most important issue with steam traps is to recognize that they all fail, and when
that occurs it will cost you substantial losses in wasted energy to produce expensive
steam. In most cases this will also impact your facility productivity. Steam traps should
be checked at least twice per year. Many companies offer a variety of test equipment
which can check for leaks or blow-through by sensing vibration combined with trap
temperatures. Trap temperatures alone will not identify a bad trap and only give you an
indication of the supply and return line pressure which can be inferred from a
temperature measurement. Advances and cost reductions in electronics have made
infra-red cameras a viable and reliable way to check steam traps if they are not
insulated. If you insulate traps, consider using a removable jacket type if you use
infrared cameras.
The best people to survey and check traps are your employees. They know your
systems and have a vested interest to do a complete survey. Be very aware of “free”
steam trap surveys offered by companies selling steam traps. Although some can be
honestly done, most I’ve seen tend to be designed to sell you more steam traps of the
types and brands they offer. If you sub-contract surveys, check carefully the credentials
of the company and people performing the survey. This is a definite buyer beware area!
As previously mentioned, all steam traps will fail; not if, but when. Failures typically
occur for the following reasons:
Steam traps fail prematurely due to improper sizing and selection with oversizing
being high on the list of trouble-makers.
Dirt and debris getting into the small internal passages are also a significant
cause of failure with a strainer or built-in strainer offering an effective solution.
Water hammer and pressure surges can cause failure of all types of traps with
F&T traps being most vulnerable. I once saw the caps blown off of Spirax Sarco
TD-52 traps which were not due to the trap, but extreme water hammer which
can generate extremely high pressure spikes.
Traps installed in installations where freezing occurs need to be protected with
proper insulation jackets and drain valves for when the steam system is shut
down.
Poor water treatment and insufficient removal of carbon dioxide can result in
formation of carbonic acid. CO2 + H2O (hot condensate) combine to form H2CO3
which is carbonic acid. Carbon acid attack is common around traps and
formations of red brown magnetic debris (rust is the indicator that carbonic acid is
present). If in doubt, check the condensate pH and if less than 6.8-7.0 then you
have a problem with CO2 removal in your deaerator.
Trap age is also a cause of failure with large amounts of trap cycles eventually
wearing out the moving parts causing a failure.
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/CIS_EO_DTE_Steam_Traps_138473_7.pdf
UE Systems produces steam trap test equipment and provides surveys. They have a lot
of good information on their web page:
http://www.uesystems.com/resources/articles-and-announcements/why-do-steam-traps-
fail
Few items in a facility offer a payback period of 1-3 months based on energy dollars
saved. Steam traps, along with steam leaks, offer this opportunity. Taking the time to
manage your steam system for leaks and steam trap failures is worth the effort with
excellent opportunities to lower energy costs and emissions.
Sizing a steam trap is based on the condensate load to the trap, pressure differential
across the trap, and safety factor.
Three quick formulas can be used to calculate the steam load for many applications.
Where
Q= lb/hr of steam
CFM=cubic feet/minute
The pressure differential across the trap is inlet pressure minus outlet pressure. Trap
inlet pressure is line pressure to the trap less any pressure drop through control valves
and equipment. Trap outlet pressure is the combination of static pressure plus any
pressure due to elevation changes. For most applications, use a safety factor of twice
the actual load.
Piping errors result in premature trap failure. All steam traps should be installed with a
discharge check valve, inlet and outlet isolation valves, and an inlet strainer. Always
allow condensate to flow to the trap and lift from the trap. Make all return lines at least
equal in size to the trap connections.
Steam traps are another text book topic. For articles and tips see –
http://www.control-specialties.com/tech-info/index.php?c=15
As an example, if energy costs are $10.00 per million BTU’s, then estimated steam
costs for 1,000 lbs of steam (one million BTU’s is the energy content of 1000 lbs of
steam) plus feedwater and chemicals would be $14.29 per 1,000.
The real cost driver in any energy delivering system is time, or hours of use, per year. A
365 day year contains 8,760 hours. If you used 1,000 lbs/hr of steam at $14.29 per
1,000, then your energy cost would be $125,180 per year. If you use 10 times as much
steam (10,000 lb/hr); then your cost would be $1,251,800 per year.
Sir Isaac Watt has been stated to say “if you cannot measure it, then you don’t know
much about it”. “It” in our case is the cost of steam and steam costs in your facility.
There are many types of flow meters available, those suitable for steam applications
include:
Each of these flowmeter types has its own advantages and limitations. To ensure
accurate and consistent performance from a steam flowmeter, it is essential to match
the flowmeter to the application.
For much more information on flow meter types and operation see –
http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/wbnr011013_ierna.pdf
This technical paper covers all of the issues to evaluate, size, select and install a flow
meter or meters for your facility.
Meter turn down is a very important issue and states what range a meter can
accurately measure the flow. The oldest steam flow meter is an orifice plate
which has a known precise area and a differential pressure gauge to measure
the pressure drop across the orifice plate. Tables can be calculated to show
steam flows for a given pressure drop. Orifice plates will typically have a turn
down ratio of 4:1. If your maximum meter flow is 10,000 lb/hr, the meter will not
read under 2,500 lb/hr or 25% of the maximum flow rate (1÷4). In many cases,
you will wind up with no readings if you drop below the turn-down ratio point.
A meter with a high turn down ratio will cost more but provide more accurate
data. As an example, a meter with a 30:1 turn-down ratio size to read 10,000
lb/hr maximum flow will read down to 333 lb/hr (1÷30).
Most meters rely on pipe velocity as the measure variable to arrive at a flow rate.
Meters should be sized for maximum design flow rate and not the pipe size.
If your pressure and temperature are constant for the steam being measured,
then no additional data is required for the meter. In most cases, pressure and
temperature will vary so added data in the form of pressures and temperatures
from sensors should be provided for the mass flow computer which provides the
actual flow rate.
Always meter the rate and total. As with a car, you need a speedometer and
odometer to understand travel. The same applies to steam flow measurements.
Rate flows are best charted to see how demand varies in a 24 hour period and is
valuable in understanding boiler operations to improve steam efficiency.
Totalized information should be used to arrive at all energy consumption data
and cost analysis.
Steam flows are typically seasonal in many facilities, so establish base
consumption data for a system in good working order. I would suggest that a
period of one month is a good starting point for studying steam consumption.
With baselines established, look for unexplained increases in consumption which
are usually due to steam leaks, failed steam traps, and condensate losses.
Changes of 5% or more are significant since they will reflect a potential savings
in energy use, reduction in water consumption, and increases in chemical
treatment costs.
Water in many areas is becoming a resource issue. Steam systems consume large
amounts of water. The conversion is:
𝑙𝑏
500 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚 = 1 𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟
ℎ𝑟
Assume you are producing 10,000 lb/hr of steam with no return. To produce 10,000
lb/hr of steam you need to feed your boiler 20 GPM of water or 1,200 gallons per hour.
For 8,760 hours in one year, that works out to 10,512,000 gallons of water. If your
consumption of steam rises 10% for no sound reason other than losses, then you have
wasted right at one million gallons of water. If you add in energy costs and water
treatment costs, this should lead to the conclusion that steam meters are in fact a great
investment.
Sir Isaac Watt has been stated to say “if you cannot measure it, then you don’t know
much about it” sure applies to a steam system.
As I finish this book, the next EBook will cover steam usage in equipment and
applications. If form follows true, I suspect it will be longer in content than I now imagine
it might be at this point.