Public Administration and Development Administration
Public Administration and Development Administration
Public Administration and Development Administration
net/publication/344165343
CITATIONS READS
0 13,832
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Legislative Cross-carpeting, Multiparty System and the Challenges of Democratic Good Governance in Nigeria View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Bamigbose Johnson Olawale on 08 September 2020.
1
Introduction
There is symbiotic relationship between Public Administration and Development Administration.
The relationship actually lies on the anticipated outcome of the two. Although, Public
Administration as an art/study precedes Development Administration but in spite of the
divergent time of their arrival, they both complement each other.
The second stream is the trend towards nationalizing and government interventionism which
emerged as a consequence of the great depression of late 1920s and early 1930s, World War II,
post-war reconstructions and other developments after the war. This has advertently declared this
model as one of crisis management and reconstruction administration (Dwivedi and Jain, 1985).
2
In a true sense of it, the basic theoretical escapade of Development Administration lies on the
precursor that Public Administration has a very decisive role to play in the effort to ensure and
assure Structural transformation of any society. The traditional roles associated with Public
Administration is then one part that will be quite slow in promoting development, then the need
to employ dynamism and innovativeness in development syndrome becomes the center of
argument which development administration surface to achieve.
It is based on the above premise, that this work intends to interrogate the synergy between Public
Administration and Development Administration in an effort to provide detailed explanation as
to the two sides of the same coin in contemporary global setting. This becomes apposite to
examine the relationship for they are both concerned with effective and efficient utilization of
both human and material resources to bring about development of the nation. Thus, there is every
tendency to mistake one for the other due to the similar functions they perform. The paper is
segmented into six segments including the introduction, conceptual discuss of the key concepts,
similarities between public administration and development administration, dichotomy between
public administration and development, the nexus between the two and conclusion.
Conceptual Discuss
This is very imperative in social science as it helps to clarify and make conspicuous key words or
concepts as used in the context of the entire work
Public Administration
Public Administration is a subfield of political science, though it has started getting special
treatment as a specialized academic field. It is a scientific discipline which deals with the
machinery and procedures of government activities. It is important to point out that public
administration (with small/lower case ‘p’ and ‘a’) is as old as the society and the state
themselves. It has evolved as the agency of state administration\management. As noted earlier,
Public Administration as a discipline emerged recently and born in United States. Woodrow
Wilson (a former US President) is regarded as the father of the discipline. He advocated for a
science of administration and then emphasized the need for a separate study of Public
Administration and made a distinction between politics and administration (Wilson, 1887).
Relatedly, Frank Goodnow in his book titled Politics and Administration (1900) distinguished
3
the divergent functions of politics and administration. To him, ‘politics has to do with politics or
expression of the state will’ while ‘administration has to do with the execution of these policies’.
Goodnow came to be regarded, as the father of American Public Administration. Wilson (1941)
declared that Public Administration is detailed and systematic application of law. Every
particular application of law is an act of administration. Merson cited in Laxmicanth (2013)
complimentarily avers that administrator gets things done, and just as the science of politics is an
enquiry into the best means whereby the will of the people may be organized for the formulation
of policy, so the science of public administration is an enquiry as to how policies may best be
carried into operation.
In both theory and practice, Hague (2010) posited that, the landscape of public administration
has fundamentally changed in recent years in terms of unprecedented shifts in its ideological
underpinning, structural configuration and normative inclination largely based on market-driven
assumptions or principles. Denhardt (1992) defined public administration as the management of
change in pursuit of publicly defined societal values. It can be viewed as the platform or
parameter of actualizing the set values of the society. It is the custodian of society’s uniqueness
and identity. A breakdown of administration will definitely necessitate the failure of our
civilization.
Thus, all the activities that have to do with planning, directing, coordinating and controlling of
collective will of the people which is holistically reflected in public policy constitute the realm of
public administration. Paul Pigors in Laxmicanth (2013) put this straight when he submitted that
the main purpose of administration is to preserve the status quo in the society. It (Administration)
ensures the continuance of the existing order with a minimum of effort and risk. Its fundamental
aim is to carry on rather than to venture new and untried paths. Administrators are essentially the
guardians of tradition. Public administration is the administration in the public sector. It is the
administration by the state. It is the governmental administration. It is the administration by
public authorities. Public authorities are authorities which administer according to the rules of
public administration. Public Administration is therefore the study of administration, descriptive,
theoretical and normative. (Ridley in Laxmicanth 2013).
4
It is within this paper that public administration denotes the generation of purposive public action
whose success depends on reconciling the competing demands of administrative operations,
democratic governance and public solving. The end product of public administration is the
actualization of defined objectives e.g.; economy, politics, tourism, health, security, sports,
education etc. by public authorities towards ensuring societal growth and development which is
the focus of Development Administration. This becomes the definition adopted by this paper.
Development Administration
In his own view, Riggs refers development administration to both administrative and
governmental reform. Arora (1979) scholarly avers that development administration has been
used in two inter-related senses. First, it refers to the administration of development programmes,
to the methods used by large scale organization, notably governments to implement policies and
plans designed to meet their developmental objectives. Second, it, by implication, rather than
directly, involves the strengthening of administrative capabilities. These two aspects of
development administration i.e. the administration of development and development of
administration are intertwined in most definitions of the term.
5
Kaur, 2012). Stones (1966) gives a wholistic explanation of development administration. To him,
development administration is concerned with achieving national development. The goals,
values, and strategies of change may vary but there are always generic processes through which
agreement on goals is reached and plans, policies, programmes and projects are formulated and
implemented. This paper adopts that development administration is the art of designing strategies
and procedures, which is faithfully implemented and will bring about much desired development,
growth and increase the welfare of the citizenry.
i. Both are concerned with effective and efficient utilization of human and material
resources towards achieving a specific objective.
ii. Both are concerned with similar goal of providing for citizenry in a given state.
6
iii. Both focus on ensuring the provision of basic necessities of life.
iv. Both engage in formulation and implementation of strategies and procedures towards
socio-economic transformation of the entire society.
v. The crux of both public administration and development administration is societal
change.
vi. Both engage multidisciplinary approach in bringing the most desired growth and overall
development.
vii. Both are aspects of a more generic concept of administration.
7
Interrogating the Nexus between Public Administration and Development Administration
As noted above, Public Administration and Development Administration are related in some
instances and divergent in others. In spite of these differentiated thoughts, it can be argued that
the two has similar objectives, although the latter relies on the former to actualize its objectives.
Obikeze and Anthony (2004) argued that the idea of development administration is the most
appropriate ways of passing from one administration which is essentially traditional in its
functions to an administration which is able and especially geared to development. Development
administration therefore needs structure (public administration) and each country should provide
itself with such structure and make it work, often using advanced technique or advanced
management methods which should correspond with the environment.
In synopsis, development administration is therefore the systematic and organized use of a well-
designed, articulate and deliberate administrative strategy (public administrative system) to
effect positive changes to the poor state of man, holistic transformation of the developing society
or states and possible advancement of the economic condition of individual.
Concluding Remark
This paper attempted an overview of the nexus between public administration and development
administration. It historicized and provided deeper understanding of both public administration
and development administration, the similarities and dichotomies were examined in the course of
the work. The paper thereby interrogated the nexus between the two and concluded that public
administration serves as the template and strategy upon which development administration lies
towards actualizing its objectives of accelerating developmental agenda in the developing
8
countries of the world. The work reveals that public administration emerged as an instrument of
the state for securing public interest which is also the fulcrum of development administration. It
can be concluded that public administrative system of any country goes a long way to bring
about the socio-economic, political and cultural transformation championed by development
administrative school of thought in any clime.
9
Reference
Denhardt, R. B. (1992). Public Administration Theory: The State of the Discipline in Lynn N. B.
and Wildavsky, A. (edited by): Public Administration: The State of the Discipline;
Chatham House Publishers, New Jersey, USA.
Dwivedi, O. P. and Jain, R. B. (1985). India’s Administrative State: Gitanjali Publishing House,
New Delhi.
Laxmicanth, M. (2013). Public Administration: For State Civil Services and other Competitive
Examinations: New Delhi: Tata McGraw- Hill Co. Ltd.
Sharma, M. P, Sadana, B. L. and Kaur, H. (2012). Public Administration in Theory and Practice,
Kitab Mahal Publishing, New Delhi.
10
Stoner, D. C. (1966). Introduction to Education of Development Administration, Brussels.
11