Risk Assessment and Risk Treatment Methodology

RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK TREATMENT
METHODOLOGY
Created by: Ahmad Nawaz
Approved
Ahmad Nawaz
by:
Change history
Date Version Created by Description of change
January 1, Ahmad
V0.1 New status: in progress. Comment: /
2022 Nawaz
January 1, Ahmad
V0.1 New status: in review. Comment: /
2022 Nawaz
January 1, Ahmad
V0.2 New status: in progress. Comment: /
2022 Nawaz
January 1, Ahmad
V0.2 New status: in approval. Comment: /
2022 Nawaz
January 1, Ahmad
V1 New status: approved. Comment: /
2022 Nawaz
1. Purpose, scope and users
The purpose of this document is to define the methodology for assessment and treatment of
information risks in Touchstone, and to define the acceptable level of risk according to the ISO/IEC
27001 standard.
Risk assessment and risk treatment are applied to the entire scope of the Information Security
Management System (ISMS), i.e., to all assets that are used within the organization or which could
have an impact on information security within the ISMS.
Users of this document are all employees of Touchstone who take part in risk assessment and risk
treatment.
2. Reference documents
 ISO/IEC 27001 standard, clauses 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 8.2, and 8.3
 Information Security Policy
 Register of legal, contractual and other requirements
 Statement of Applicability
 Risk Treatment Plan
3. Risk assessment and risk treatment methodology

3.1. Risk assessment
3.1.1. The process
Risk assessment is implemented through the Risk register on the {Please Write What is
appropriate}. The risk assessment and treatment process is coordinated by the Security Officer,
identification of threats and vulnerabilities is performed by asset owners, and assessment of impact
and likelihood is also performed by asset owners.
3.1.2. Assets, vulnerabilities and threats
The first step in risk assessment is the identification of all assets in the ISMS scope – i.e., of all
assets that may affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information in the organization.
Assets may include documents and data in paper, electronic, or other forms, software and
databases, human resources, IT and communication equipment, infrastructure, and third-party
services. When identifying assets, it is also necessary to identify their owners – the person or
organizational unit responsible for each asset.
The next step is to identify all threats and vulnerabilities associated with each asset. Threats and
vulnerabilities are identified using catalogues provided in the Risk register. Every asset may be
associated with several vulnerabilities, and every vulnerability may be associated with several
threats.
3.1.3. Determining the risk owners
For each risk, a risk owner has to be identified – the person or organizational unit responsible for
each risk.
3.1.4. Impact and likelihood
Asset owners must assess consequences for each combination of threats and vulnerabilities for an
individual asset if such a risk materializes:
Loss of confidentiality, availability, or integrity does not affect the organization's

Low impact 0
cash flow, legal or contractual obligations, or its reputation.
Loss of confidentiality, availability, or integrity incurs costs and has a low or
Moderate
1 moderate impact on legal or contractual obligations, or the organization's
impact
reputation.
Loss of confidentiality, availability, or integrity has considerable and/or
High impact 2 immediate impact on the organization's cash flow, operations, legal or contractual
obligations, or its reputation.
After the assessment of consequences, it is necessary to assess the likelihood of occurrence of

such a risk, i.e., the probability that a threat will exploit the vulnerability of the respective asset:
Low Existing security controls are strong and have so far provided an adequate level
0
likelihood of protection. No new incidents are expected in the future.
Moderate Existing security controls are moderate and have mostly provided an adequate
1
likelihood level of protection. New incidents are possible, but not highly likely.
High Existing security controls are low or ineffective. Such incidents have a high
2
likelihood likelihood of occurring in the future.
By entering the values of impact and likelihood into the Risk register, the level of risk is calculated
automatically by adding up the two values.
3.2. Risk acceptance criteria
Values 0, 1, and 2 are acceptable risks, while values 3 and 4 are unacceptable risks. Unacceptable
risks must be treated.
3.3. Risk treatment
One or more treatment options must be selected for risks valued at 3 and 4:
1. Selection of security controls, or controls from Annex A of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, or
some other security controls
2. Transferring the risks to a third party – e.g., by purchasing an insurance policy or signing a
contract with suppliers or partners
3. Avoiding the risk by discontinuing a business activity that causes such risk
4. Accepting the risk – this option is allowed only if the selection of other risk treatment options
would cost more than the potential impact should such risk materialize
The selection of options is implemented through the Risk register. Usually, option 1 is selected:
selection of one or more security controls.
The treatment of risks related to outsourced processes must be addressed through the contracts
with responsible third parties.
In the case of option 1 (selection of security controls), a new value of impact and likelihood is
automatically calculated in the Risk register based on the selected controls, in order to show the
effectiveness of the planned controls - this is called "residual risk".
3.4. Regular reviews of risk assessment and risk treatment
Risk owners must review existing risks and require of the Security Officer to update the Risk register
in line with newly identified risks. The review is conducted at least once a year, or more frequently in
the case of significant organizational changes, significant changes in technology, a change in
business objectives, changes in the business environment, or any other change that can impact the
ISMS.
3.5. Statement of Applicability and Risk Treatment Plan
The Security Officer must document the following in the Statement of Applicability: the justification
for each applicable and non-applicable control from Annex A of the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, and
the controls that were implemented prior to the ISO 27001 project; all other information is filled out
automatically by the {Please Write What is appropriate}.
Risk owners must decide whether or not they accept each residual risk in the Risk register.
The Security Officer will prepare the Risk treatment plan, in which the implementation of controls will
be planned. The top management needs to approve the required resources for the execution of the
plan, while risk owners must approve the whole Risk treatment plan.
3.6. Reporting
The results of risk assessment and risk treatment, as well as the results of all of the subsequent
reviews, will be automatically generated through the {Please Write What is appropriate} and made
available in the Risk Assessment and Treatment Report.
The Security Officer will monitor the progress of implementation of the Risk Treatment Plan and
report the results to the Head of IT department monthly.
4. Managing records kept on the basis of this document
Storage Person responsible Control for record

Record name Retention time
location for storage protection
Only Security
{Please Write Officer has the right to
Data is stored
Risk register What is Security Officer make entries into and
permanently.
appropriate} changes to the Risk
register.
The created report is The report is kept on
Risk
{Please Write automatically stored the {Please Write The report is
assessment and
What is by the {Please Write What is appropriate} stored for a period
treatment
appropriate} What is appropriate} and exported in read- of 3 years.
report
once created. only PDF format.
Only Security
Officer has the right to Older versions of
Statement of {Please Write
make entries into and the SoA are stored
Applicability What is Security Officer
changes to the permanently in
module appropriate}
Statement of PDF form.
Applicability module.
The created Risk
Only Security Older versions of
Treatment Plan is
{Please Write Officer has the right to the Risk treatment
Risk Treatment automatically stored
What is make entries into and plan are stored for
Plan by the {Please Write
appropriate} changes to the Risk a period of 3
What is appropriate}
Treatment Plan. years.
once created.
Only Security Officer can grant other employees access to any of the above-mentioned documents.
5. Validity and document management

This document is valid as of January 1, 2022.
The owner of this document is the head of compliance, who must check and, if necessary, update
the document at least every 6 months, before the regular review of the existing risk assessment.

Risk Assessment and Risk Treatment Methodology

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Risk Assessment and Risk Treatment Methodology

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Risk Assessment and Risk Treatment Methodology

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK TREATMENT

3. Risk assessment and risk treatment methodology

3.1.2. Assets, vulnerabilities and threats

3.1.3. Determining the risk owners

3.1.4. Impact and likelihood

Loss of confidentiality, availability, or integrity does not affect the organization's

After the assessment of consequences, it is necessary to assess the likelihood of occurrence of

3.2. Risk acceptance criteria

3.3. Risk treatment

3.4. Regular reviews of risk assessment and risk treatment

3.5. Statement of Applicability and Risk Treatment Plan

4. Managing records kept on the basis of this document

Storage Person responsible Control for record

5. Validity and document management

You might also like