Downloaded from: justpaste.

it/2lw13

Deterring the Munafiqin

‫ الصلاة والسلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين‬،‫ بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم‬،‫اعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم‬

I seek refuge in Allah from the accursed Shaytan, In the Name of Allah the Most Benevolent,
the Most Merciful, Peace and blessings be upon the messenger of Allah and all his prodigy
and companions.

I will be refuting the Munafiqin and Juhal; whom have clear misguidance and deviance in their
hearts, that say the Caliphate are from the Khawarij or/and they are funded by Israel and the
Jews (May the curse of Allah be upon them!).

I ask Allah to forgive me if I err in writing this.

‫َوِلَّلِه ٱْلِع َّز ُة َوِلَر ُس وِلِه ۦ َوِلْلُم ْؤ ِمِنيَن َو َٰلِك َّن ٱْلُم َٰنِفِقيَن َلا َيْع َلُم وَن‬

And to Allah belongs [all] honor, and to His Messenger, and to the believers, but the hypocrites
do not know. (63:8)

"The Islamic State are Khawarij."

By Allah, the Islamic State is free from the Khawarij.

The Khawarij have a set of beliefs and fundamentals that make them Khawarij. Let us
examine a few:

 • They make takfir based on major sins, ex. Makes takfir on the Alcohol drinking etc.

 • They have Mutazili aqidah, they believe the Quran is created.

• They fight the people of Islam while leaving the kuffar alone.

• They think Imaan does not increase nor Decrease.

• They make takfir on 'Ali and 'Uthman.

• They reject they will see Allah on Yawm al Qiyamah.

• They reject the punishment of Stoning. 

• They punish thieves from cutting from the shoulder instead of the Hands.

• They make takfir of muslims in Dar al Kufr.

• They rebel against Muslim leaders.

[Khawarij don't have all these beliefs at once].

Indeed Dawlah has none of these beliefs, nor have commited any of these actions and they
do not leave the people of Shirk with a moment to rest!

Translated version of, "This is our Manhaaj and Aqidah" by the Islamic State:
https://www.aymennjawad.org/2015/10/this-is-our-aqeeda-and-this-is-our-manhaj-islam

"But ISIS kill innocents?"

What Innocents do you talk about? The Kuffar? Verily the kuffar are not innocent because of
their kufr, their blood is halal to spill as long as they do not have any treaties with the Muslim.

The Asl of the Kafir's blood is it is halal to spill:

https://fursanpublications.wordpress.com/2021/10/18/asl-of-the-permissibility-of-the-kafirs-
blood/

(I have already made an article on this and will not repeat it).

"ISIS kill Muslims."

Simply killing muslims is not from the beliefs and actions of the Khawarij, Ali, Muawiyah and
Khalid ibn al-Walid (May Allah be pleased with them!) killed Muslims. Now will you call them
Khawarij?

Who are these Muslims you talk about? The Apostate Sahawaat? The Rawafidh? The
PKK/SDF? The Armies of the Tawaghit (Turkey, Saudi, Iraq, Egypt etc.)? They are not
muslims rather they are apostates.
Indeed, the Mujahidin are not perfect and have slain Muslims (May Allah forgive them and
accept them all into Jannah), though not on purpose. Shaikh Abu Muhammad al-Adnani and
Shaikh al-Zarqawi said it was more loveable to for them to die rather than to harm a Muslim.

The muslims that are killed by the State are unintentional, although there is a great deal of
Maslahah in this issue and it will take too long to cover it here.
 
"IS Khilafah is illegitimate." 

What requirement of Khilafah do they not fulfil?

The Caliph is a Man, Adult, Skilled and Educated, From the Quraysh, free from
physical/mental problems.

Debate between Ustadh Abu Baraa and Abdul Rahman Hasan on the Khilafah:

https://archive.org/details/TheKhilafahDebateUstadhAbdurRahmanHassanUstadhAbuBaraah 

Shorter video on the topic:

https://archive.org/details/the-light-revelations_11_syria-stories-of-conquest/the-light-
revelations_21_the-khilafa-debate.mp4#

"ISIS burn kuffar, which is haram as Rasulullah (‫ )صلى الله عليه وسلم‬said."

The Islamic State only burns war captives as Qisas (retaliation). If the Kuffar burn Muslimin
then it becomes Halal to burn them, and the evidence for this is:

Al-Bukhārī mentions the following Hadīth under the chapter he entitled, “If a mushrik burns a
Muslim- Can he be burned?”

And Anas Ibn Mālik (ra) narrated, “Some people of the tribe of 'Ukl and 'Uraynah arrived at
Madīnah to meet the Prophet and embraced Islām and said, "O Prophet of Allāh! We are the
owners of milch livestock (i.e. bedouins) and not farmers (i.e. countrymen)." They found the
climate of Al-Madīnah unsuitable for them. So the Messenger ordered that they should be
provided with some milch camels and a shepherd and ordered them to go out of Al-Madīnah
and to drink the camels' milk and urine (as medicine) So they set out and when they reached
Al- Harrah, they apostatized after embracing Islām, and killed the shepherd of the Prophet and
drove away (with) [i.e. stole] the camels. When this news reached the Prophet, he sent some
people in pursuit of them. (So they were caught and brought back to the Prophet). The
Prophet gave his orders in their concern. So their eyes were branded with pieces of iron and
their hands and legs were cut off and they were left away in Al- Harrah till they died in that
state of theirs.”

Refer to “Sahīh Al-Bukhārī” (2/546, # 1430) and “Sahīh Muslim” (3/1296, # 1671).

Al-Bājī (ra) commented regarding this incident, “They [the apostates] had done the same thing
to the shepherds. So in this situation, it is permissible to mutilate [with fire] the one who
mutilated the Muslim [with fire] - in accordance with the rule of Qisās.”

Refer to “Al-Muntaqā Sharh Al-Muwatta’” (3/172).

And Allah said in the Qur’an (translation of the meaning):

[Fighting in] the sacred month is for [aggression committed in] the sacred month, and for [all]
violations is legal retribution. So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same
way that he has assaulted you. And fear Allah and know that Allah is with those who fear Him.
(Qur’an 2:194)

Imām At-Tabarī (ra) said while explaining this Verse, “This means (that Allāh is saying)...
Because I have made the forbidden things a matter of Qisās- So whichever mushrikīn makes
permissible- O Mu’minīn- the sanctity of My Sanctuary [Al-Masjid Al-Harām], then you too
make it permissible (Istihlāl) similarly.”

Therefore if Mushrikin fight and kill us by burning, then this Ayah allows us to fight and kill
them by burning as well, even though it has generally been prohibited.

And there were many scholars, including Sahaba, who used fire as punishment in general
even after the Hadith of ibn Abbas reached them, and they did not limit it to Qisas. So this is a
matter of valid Ikhtilaf, we cannot criticize those who hold this view.

And punishing with fire was held permissible by ‘Alī and Khālid Ibn al- Walīd and others.”
[Fat’h Al-Bārī 6/150]. And Ash-Shawkānī said, “And indeed Abū Bakr (ra) burned people with
fire in the presence of the Companions; and Khālid Ibn Al-Walīd burned people from amongst
the apostates, and so did ‘Alī.” [Nayl Al-Awtār 7/250]. And Ibn Taymiyyah said, “It is narrated
with good chains of narration from him (‘Alī) that he torched the heretics.” [Majmū’ Al-Fatāwā
8/474]. And it might be argued that ‘Alī, Abū Bakr, and Khālid were not aware of the Hadīth
prohibiting the use of fire as punishment- but this is a futile argument. Because it is narrated
that Ibn ‘Abbās (ra) said about ‘Alī (ra) burning the apostates, “If it was up to me, I ‫صلى االله عليه‬
would not have torched them due to the prohibition of the Prophet None should punish with
fire, because it is Allāh Who punishes with fire.” But“ , ‫ وسلم‬instead I would have just killed
them.” [Refer to “Saheeh Al-Bukhārī” 6/2537]. And when this criticism from Ibn ‘Abbās (ra)
reached ‘Alī (ra), he did not accept his understanding of the Hadīth (i.e. that it is prohibited
under all circumstances) - and remained upon the validity of his actions of torching the
apostates, and said regarding the statement of Ibn ‘Abbās (ra), “"Woe to Ibn 'Abbās!” [Refer to
Ad-Dāraqutnī 3/108, “Musnad Ahmad” 1/282, “Musannaf ‘Abdur-Razzāq” 5/213]. And it has
been recorded by ‘Abdur-Razzāq that, “When Khālid torched the apostates, ‘Umar (ra) told
Abū Bakr (ra), “Will you allow him to punish with the Punishment of Allāh?” So Abū Bakr (ra)
replied, “I will not cover a sword which Allāh has unleashed upon the kuffār.”

"ISIS tortures their enemies/prisoners."

Allah and His Messenger have permitted killing kuffar in general and they did not specify how
to kill them. The burden of proof is on you to show us that it’s haram to kill Kuffar through
torturing them.

Despite this, there is no exact ruling on the treatement of Kuffar Prisoners, refer to Imam
Anwar al-Awlaqi's video:
https://adviceforparadise.com/lectures/detail/462/

"ISIS rapes Yazidi women, rape is against Islam."

There is no proof that the Islamic State has raped Yazidi females. We cannot trust the
testimony of Kuffar against Muslims unless there is other evidence for it, for Allah says:

O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information,
investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become, over what you have done,
 regretful. (Qur’an 49:6)

Also many of these testimonies from Yazidi females are usually not corroborated, have
discrepancies and contradictions, and they have never been evaluated in a Shar’i court. We
are not allowed to spread these baseless rumours.

Secondly, sex-slavery/concubineage is halal in Islam.

Allah says in An-Nisa' 4:24:

‫ْۖم‬
‫َو ٱْلُمْح َص َٰنُت ِم َن ٱلِّنَس آِء َّلا َم ا َم َلَك ْت َأْيَٰمُنُك‬
‫ِإ‬
And [also prohibited to you are all] married women except those your right hands possess.

Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said,

"We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked
having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the
Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed,

‫َّا‬
‫َو اْلُمْح َص َناُت ِم َن الِّنَس اء ِإل َم ا َم َلَك ْت َأْيَم اُنُك ْم‬

(Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess).
Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women." [Tafsir ibn Kathir]

"The Islamic State has no scholars."

This a lie upon the I.S., there have been hundreds of knowledgable shyukh in their ranks/in
support of them.

For example, Shaikh Nasir al-Fahd, Turki al-Bin'ali, Abdullah Faisal, Anjem Chaudary,
Muhammad Omar Bakri, Abu Malik al-Tamimi, Abu Bakr al-Qahtani, Abu Hafs al-Hamdani,
Abu Ali al-Anbari, Hamad al-Humadi, Abu Usama Musaid ibn Bashir al-Sudani, this list could
go on.

Turki al-Bin'ali is one of the most well known scholars, here is a list of the teachers of Shaykh
Turki Bin’ali:
https://www.jihadica.com/wp-
content/uploads/2014/07/1%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%A
9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%A9-
%D9%84%D9%84%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%AE-
%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%AF-
%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%83%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D9%86-
%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%83-
%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A.pdf

He was also given Ijazah by Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi and Umar al-Hadushi BTW, whom he
later denounced.

"Daesh said if the Prophet ‫ صلى الله عليه وسلم‬was alive today he would follow them."

I really don’t see the issue with this if the Islamic State is based upon the Prophetic
methodology. It is just saying that if the Prophet was alive today, he would have agreed with
and supported the Khilafah and Mujahidin. What’s wrong with that? Any other Islam group
would also say that the Prophet would support people whom they deem as true Mujahidin,
because they believe that their group is upon Haqq.

And again, even if we assume that this is somehow wrong, he is just one person who isn’t
known as a representative, spokesman, leader or even an official, therefore it cannot be used
as an argument against Dawlah in its entirety.

"The Imaam, al-Haafiz Ibn Katheer (died, 774AH, rahimahullaah) stated in “Al-Bidaayah

wan-Nihaayah” (10/584-585) regarding what the Khawaarij would do to the Ummah if
they ever attained strength:

'If they ever gained strength, they would surely corrupt the whole of the
earth, Iraq and Syria (Shaam) – they would not leave a baby, male or female, neither a
man or a woman, because as far as they are concerned the people have caused
corruption, a corruption that cannot be rectified except by mass killing.'"

For this to be proof against Dawlah, you must first establish the fact they are Khawarij. You
cannot use this as proof as it is not proven they are Khawarij and simply being from Syria/Iraq
is not an asl of fhe Khawarij.

"It was narrated in Kitaab Al-Fitan (the Book of Trials), that Ali bin Abi Taalib (ra) said:
"If you see the black flags, then hold the ground and do not move your hands or your
feet. A people will come forth who are weak and have no capability, their hearts are like
blocks of iron. They are the people of the State (literally says "the people of Al-Dawla"),
they do not keep a promise or treaty..."
This was refuted by the brothers at the Light Revelations, I won't repeat their arguement here.

The Islamic State in the light of the Athar of Ali:

https://ia802705.us.archive.org/24/items/TheLightRevelationsEpisodes124/Hadith%20of%20A
li/The%20Islamic%20State%20in%20Light%20of%20The%20%27Hadith%20of%20Ali%27%2
0%28RA%29.mp4

Shaykh 'Abdul-Majid al-Hitari said before he was killed by the Houthis: 

"It's not proven with a single proof that the manhaj of Dawlah is Khariji. No one accuses them
with such except one afflicted with madhhab of the Murjiah or democracy. Thus whoever
stands with the Crusaders against them using the argument they are Khawarij is a murtadd."
End Qoute.
(Although, many of the muslims are excused with jahl al-hal in this).

God willing, I will refute those who say the State are the agents of MOSSAD and the jews.

"ISIS never attack Israel."

AMBJ (IS in Sinai) raiding Eilat, an Israeli city:

https://archive.org/details/gharib56_tutanota_20151019_1

Um Rashash attack on Jews:

https://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/484692

Terrorist Attack on Eilat:

https://www.jpost.com/Defense/Eight-killed-in-massive-terror-assault-near-Eilat

Eilat Attack in 2011:

https://www.marefa.org/%D9%87%D8%AC%D9%88%D9%85_%D8%A5%D9%8A%D9%84%
D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A3%D8%BA%D8%B3%D8%B7%D8%B3_2011

ISIS launching Rockets on Eilat:

ISIS executing a MOSSAD spy:
https://archive.org/details/Wjziral

ISIS attacking Israel from Sinai:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/islamic-state-claims-responsibility-for-sinai-rocket-attack-on-
israel/
 
https://archive.is/o/o1mBU/https://files.catbox.moe/0nc61b.png

ISIS blowing up Israeli-Egyptian gaslines:

https://archive.is/KNVXJ

Israel and Egypt work together against ISIS in Sinai:

 
https://archive.is/o/o1mBU/https://files.catbox.moe/9wtijj.png
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/03/world/middleeast/israel-airstrikes-sinai-egypt.html

ISIS didn't apologise to Israel:

https://archive.is/o/o1mBU/https://files.catbox.moe/e5njxs.png

"Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is a Mossad agent, he is Simon Elliot/Motaz Hattar."

More information on the Snowden Leak:
https://justpaste.it/Mosad-ISIS-En

This was fabricated.

http://liberalconspiracy.org/2014/08/14/the-isis-leader-was-not-trained-by-the-cia-or-mossad-
and-snowden-didnt-say-it/

http://snowdenhoax.blogspot.com/

Wiki Leaks denies it: https://twitter.com/wikileaks/statuses/497889048263147522

Here is the Instagram of Motaz Hattar:

(Awrah warning).
 
https://www.instagram.com/motaz_hattar/
 
So clearly, this cannot be Amir al-Mu'mineen.
 
 
A Good Video on refuting some of the lies against Dawlah:
https://archive.org/details/the-light-revelations_11_syria-stories-of-conquest/the-light-
revelations_21_the-khilafa-debate.mp4#
 
Another good refutation:
https://www.justpaste.it/AreISKhwrj
And Allah knows best.

May he guide us and support the Mujahidin and grant them thabat/sabr. Indeed the enemies
of Allah try hard day and night to deter the Muslims from backing the Mujahidin but by the
grace of Allah they will find no success.

May Allah shower peace and blessings upon the one sent with a sword as a mercy to the
world, his prodegy and his companions.

Al-Isra' 17:81
‫ُۚل‬
‫َو ُقْل َج آَء ٱْلَح ُّق َو َز َه َق ٱْلَٰبِط ِإَّن ٱْلَٰبِط َل َك اَن َز ُه وًقا‬
And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever
bound to depart."