1AO.2.2 Presentation
1AO.2.2 Presentation
1AO.2.2 Presentation
D. N. Micha1,2, A. Walker3, G.
Siefer3, A. W. Bett3 and F. Dimroth3
1CEFET/RJ, Petrópolis, Brazil
2INCT/DISSE/CNPq – PUC-Rio –
RJ, Brazil
3Fraunhofer ISE, Freiburg, Germany.
20/06/2016
European Photovoltaics Specialist
Conference – EU-PVSEC
© Fraunhofer ISE
OUTLINE
2
© Fraunhofer ISE
Photon Recycling Effect
Sample cell
4
© Fraunhofer ISE
Results – Current – Voltage
Reference Cell vs. Sample Cell
Jsc Voc
Sample
[mA/cm2] [V]
Cell on substrate (reference) 29.05 1.055
Thin film cell with BSR
29.38 1.074
(sample)
5
© Fraunhofer ISE
Results – External Quantum Efficiency
Reference Cell vs. Sample Cell
6
© Fraunhofer ISE
Results – Internal Quantum Efficiency
Reference Cell vs. Sample Cell
7
© Fraunhofer ISE
Results – Internal Quantum Efficiency
Reference Cell vs. Sample Cell
DIFFERENCE IN BANDGAP???
DIFFERENCE IN MATERIAL QUALITY???
8
© Fraunhofer ISE
Quantum Efficiency Definitions
ne hc
EQE SR
ngI e
ne ne EQE
IQE
ngA AngI A
9
© Fraunhofer ISE
Quantum Efficiency Definitions
ne hc
EQE SR
ngI e
ne ne EQE
IQE
ngA AngI A
???
10
© Fraunhofer ISE
Internal Quantum Efficiency Definitions
11
© Fraunhofer ISE
Internal Quantum Efficiency Definitions
12
© Fraunhofer ISE
Internal Quantum Efficiency Definitions
Transmission into
absorptive substrate
13
© Fraunhofer ISE
Internal Quantum Efficiency Definitions
14
© Fraunhofer ISE
Internal Quantum Efficiency Definitions
15
© Fraunhofer ISE
Internal Quantum Efficiency Definitions
16
© Fraunhofer ISE
Internal Quantum Efficiency Definitions – Modeling
EQE
IQEtrans
1 R
EQE
IQEabs
1 R T
17
© Fraunhofer ISE
Internal Quantum Efficiency Definitions – Experimental
19
© Fraunhofer ISE
Material Electronic Parameters Extraction
20 •H. J. Hovel, Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol. 11: Solar Cells, New York: Academic Press, 1975.
© Fraunhofer ISE •IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, VOL. 49, NO. 5, 2013
Material Electronic Parameters Extraction
Parameter Value
Hole diffusion length (mm) 0.9
Electron diffusion length (mm) 5
Front side surface rec. velocity
1000
(cm/s)
Back side surface rec. velocity
1
(cm/s)
Hole mobility (cm2V-1s-1) 2500
Electron mobility (cm2V-1s-1) 270 Same for both cells!!!
21 •H. J. Hovel, Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol. 11: Solar Cells, New York: Academic Press, 1975.
© Fraunhofer ISE •IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, VOL. 49, NO. 5, 2013
Conclusions
By exploiting the photon recycling effect and a larger optical path in high
quality crystalline GaAs thin film solar cell, we showed increases in VOC by
1.8% and in JSC by 1.1%.
Some interesting features appeared in the calculation of IQE for the solar
cells. We showed that the differences are related to the definition of IQE.
The IQE shall be defined by the absorptivity, instead of the total light entering
the cell, to refer to solely the active region of the solar cell.
We showed that with the proper models to theoretically calculate EQE, the
material parameters extracted from experiments are the same in both types
of solar cell.
Values for the material parameters can differ when using IQE from
incorrect definition.
22
© Fraunhofer ISE
THANK YOU FOR THE ATTENTION!!!
daniel.micha@cefet-rj.br
© Fraunhofer ISE