Rise Against Hate vs. Bridgewater Township
Rise Against Hate vs. Bridgewater Township
Rise Against Hate vs. Bridgewater Township
Defendants.
Corporation through its undersigned counsel, Law Offices of Eric A. Shore, hereby pleads:
1. This is an action alleging violation of the New Jersey Open Public Records Act
(OPRA), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -18 and a violation of Plaintiff’s common law right to access to
public government records. Plaintiffs bring this action because the herein named Defendants have
unlawfully and improperly denied Plaintiff access to government records that are not exempt.
2. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-6 and the
IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES
4. Plaintiff is a non-profit organization, formed under the laws of the State of New
Jersey, which maintains an office at 12 Manor House Court, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08003.
5. Plaintiff was and is currently recognized by the United States Internal Revenue
7. Defendant, Linda Doyle, at all times pertinent hereto, was and is the Township’s
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
8. Plaintiff’s purpose is to raise awareness about racism, civil rights, investigate racial
9. Plaintiff has a key focus in New Jersey, and accomplishes its mission through many
facets, most important of which is by disseminating information, such as its investigation results
to citizens in towns such as Township, civil rights and discrimination training and support events
to citizens in towns and by keeping citizens in towns informed on current events that affect or
concern the civil rights of citizens who are members of historically marginalized communities.
10. Plaintiff also acts as a watch dog organization that monitors municipalities, such as
Township, to ensure that they, and their agents, employees, law enforcement and officials, are
11. Upon information and belief, Township has information concerning police officers’
12. Upon information and belief, Township maintains and/or has access to these
records.
13. On or about February 24, 2022, with its mission in mind, Plaintiff submitted an
OPRA request to Township via electronic mail, a true and complete copy is e-filed as Exhibit A.
Plaintiff’s OPRA request asked for “Please provide police officers names employed by
Bridgewater police, salary, years of service, age, and gender at present date in a tab delimitated
format.”
14. Township provided salary information, without any other information. Exhibit B
COUNT I
Violation of OPRA, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -18.
15. Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by way of reference each and every allegation
16. The records requested by Plaintiff are “government records” pursuant to N.J.S.A.
47:1A-1.1.
18. To date, Defendants’ have not made the requested documents available to Plaintiff
despite Plaintiff’s OPRA request, despite the request being for a specific record and being in a
19. As a result of Defendants’ wrongful and illicit denial of Plaintiff’s OPRA request,
declaration by the Court that Defendants wrongfully denied Plaintiff’s OPRA Request; pursuant
to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-6, an award against Defendants for Plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys’ fees; an
award against Defendants to reimburse Plaintiff’s court costs, and pre and post judgement interest;
and any other relief that the Court deems just and equitable.
COUNT II
20. Plaintiff repeats and incorporates by way of reference each and every allegation
21. The employment records are a public record, that are populated and filled out at
least in part by Township and its officials, officers, employees, and agents.
22. The records are a public record filed or accessible within Township’s office.
23. Plaintiff, as a New Jersey formed nonprofit and civil rights watch dog organization,
has a clear and undeniable interest in Township’s public records to accomplish Plaintiff’s mission
to combat gender disparities in law enforcement hiring and salaries, and help protect citizens’ civil
24. Township may have a minimal privacy interest in the non-disclosure of its these
records.
25. Even if Township had an interest in non-disclosure law enforcement hiring records,
it is significantly outweighed by Plaintiff’s mission and the public’s interest in Plaintiff’s mission
and works.
SOM-L-000397-22 04/08/2022 11:45:51 AM Pg 5 of 7 Trans ID: LCV20221413411
26. Despite Plaintiff’s request for Township’s documents to date, Defendants have not
declaration by the Court that Defendants wrongfully denied Plaintiff’s OPRA Request; pursuant
to N.J.S.A. 47:1A-6, an award against Defendants for Plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys’ fees; an
award against Defendants to reimburse Plaintiff’s court costs, and pre and post judgement interest;
and any other relief that the Court deems just and equitable.
Defendants are hereby requested to provide copies of any and all policies of insurance
which may provide coverage for the claims and causes of action contained in this complaint.
Plaintiff hereby designates Megan Jeffery of the Law Offices of Eric A. Shore as trial
counsel.
R. 4:5-1 CERTIFICATION
2. To the best of my knowledge and belief, this matter in controversy is not the subject
of any other action pending in any Court or of a pending arbitration proceeding, nor is any such
3. I certify that confidential personal identifiers have been redacted from documents
now submitted to the court, and will be redacted from all documents submitted in the future in
VERIFICATION
1. I am the current Executive Director of Rise Against Hate. Org, the Plaintiff in this
matter.
2. I have read the Verified Complaint. The factual allegations in the Verified
Complaint are true. The said Verified Complaint is based on personal knowledge and is made in
truth and good faith and without collusion, for the causes set forth herein. As to any facts alleged
3. All documents attached to the Verified Complaint, if any, are true copies and have
not been redacted, changed, modified, adjusted or otherwise altered in any manner by me or my
I certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the
/S/ _______________________
Nintex AssureSign® 8e40b4e7-6dcd-4b5c-9d65-ae700146d7a5