Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 74 views

    Jurisprudence - Marking Guide

    Uploaded by

    Jona
    This document outlines the marking guide for coursework and examinations at Makerere University School of Law. It provides the percentage ranges and criteria for different grade levels: - 80-100% (A grade) is for excellent answers that demonstrate a good understanding of theories and concepts, the ability to apply them to answer questions comprehensively, and the use of relevant authorities coupled with original thinking. - 70-79% (B grade) is for good answers that show an appreciation of main issues, make appropriate critical points, and apply theories coherently and with original thinking. - 60-69% (C grade) is for competent answers that provide useful points and apply relevant ideas with some analysis, though with

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Jurisprudence - Marking Guide

    Uploaded by

    Jona
    74 views1 page
    This document outlines the marking guide for coursework and examinations at Makerere University School of Law. It provides the percentage ranges and criteria for different grade levels: - 80-100% (A grade) is for excellent answers that demonstrate a good understanding of theories and concepts, the ability to apply them to answer questions comprehensively, and the use of relevant authorities coupled with original thinking. - 70-79% (B grade) is for good answers that show an appreciation of main issues, make appropriate critical points, and apply theories coherently and with original thinking. - 60-69% (C grade) is for competent answers that provide useful points and apply relevant ideas with some analysis, though with

    Original Description:

    a jurisprudence marking guide

    Original Title

    Jurisprudence_Marking Guide

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines the marking guide for coursework and examinations at Makerere University School of Law. It provides the percentage ranges and criteria for different grade levels: - 80-100% (A grade) is for excellent answers that demonstrate a good understanding of theories and concepts, the ability to apply them to answer questions comprehensively, and the use of relevant authorities coupled with original thinking. - 70-79% (B grade) is for good answers that show an appreciation of main issues, make appropriate critical points, and apply theories coherently and with original thinking. - 60-69% (C grade) is for competent answers that provide useful points and apply relevant ideas with some analysis, though with

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    74 views1 page

    Jurisprudence - Marking Guide

    Uploaded by

    Jona
    This document outlines the marking guide for coursework and examinations at Makerere University School of Law. It provides the percentage ranges and criteria for different grade levels: - 80-100% (A grade) is for excellent answers that demonstrate a good understanding of theories and concepts, the ability to apply them to answer questions comprehensively, and the use of relevant authorities coupled with original thinking. - 70-79% (B grade) is for good answers that show an appreciation of main issues, make appropriate critical points, and apply theories coherently and with original thinking. - 60-69% (C grade) is for competent answers that provide useful points and apply relevant ideas with some analysis, though with

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    OFFICIAL

    Dr. B. Kabumba
    Ms. J. Ngaiza

    MAKERERE UNIVERSITY
    SCHOOL OF LAW
    UNIVERSITY EXAMINATIONS
    ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021

    FOURTH YEAR SEMESTERS I & II EXAMINATIONS FOR


    THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF LAWS
    JURISPRUDENCE (Undergraduate Programme)

    FIRST YEAR SEMESTERS I & II EXAMINATIONS


    FOR DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS (Postgraduate Programme)

    Overall Marking Guide for coursework and examination:

    80-100% Awarded for: Excellent answers to the questions; good understanding, identification and
    appreciation of the main theories, concepts/ideas behind the questions and capacity to apply them to answer the
    questions and in making comprehensive assessment of issues involved. This includes a good use of relevant
    authorities coupled with originality and independent thinking, clear arguments and presentation of persuasive
    divergent views.

    70-79% Awarded for: Good answers to the questions with good appreciation of main issues and ability to
    make appropriate critical points which show good understanding of issues behind the questions. Exhibiting
    awareness and appreciation of the main theories, concepts/ideas and is able to apply them in a coherent and
    well-presented and argued manner. Presence of originality and possibly critical/independent thinking.

    60-69% Awarded for: Competent answers to the questions, bringing out useful points and applying relevant
    ideas. There is limited analysis and originality even if substantiating and presenting arguments and comments
    relevantly and intelligently.

    50-59 Awarded for: Sensible/relevant responses and comments and maybe, some level of reasonable/good
    arguments though also characterized by limited use and understanding of the questions and applicable theories
    or application of authorities.

    0-48% Awarded for: Inadequate presentation, characterized by little evidence of reading and understanding
    of the questions or relevant concepts applicable in answering the questions. The answers contain unrelated or
    inappropriate/inapplicable arguments. The essays are mainly unoriginal, incomprehensible or merely descriptive
    and unsubstantiated, characterised by some level of incoherence in argument.

    You might also like