Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/23 October/November 2021
Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/23 October/November 2021
Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/23 October/November 2021
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2021 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however, the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Note: All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the passage.
Question 1
This question tests the following writing assessment objectives (25 marks)
Base your letter on what you have read in both texts, but be careful to
use your own words. Address both of the bullet points.
Notes on task:
Text A
Text B
• school visits to actual historic sites are better to learn a country’s history
• behaviour conventions in museums are unrealistic for young people
• students can’t afford to waste time out of class
• museum visits could help ease stress for students under pressure with
exams
• museum visits could be enough to spark students’ interest in
history/encourage them to find out more
• young people need novel / new / engaging exhibits / need to look to the
future, not the past
• museums’ new branding is not targeted at young people
• the proportion of fake exhibits does not invalidate the museum
experience altogether
• commercialism of modern museums is cynical / profit over history /
exploitative of young people
Table A, Writing
0 0 • No creditable content.
Table B, Reading
6 13–15 • Successfully evaluates ideas and opinions, both explicit and implicit.
(R1, R2, R3)
• Assimilates ideas from the text to give a developed, sophisticated
response. (R3, R5)
5 10–12 • Some successful evaluation of ideas and opinions, both explicit and
implicit. (R1, R2, R3)
• A thorough response, supported by a detailed selection of relevant ideas
from the text. (R3, R5)
4 7–9 • Begins to evaluate mainly explicit ideas and opinions. (R1, R2, R3)
• An appropriate response that includes relevant ideas from the text. (R3,
R5)
3 5–6 • Selects and comments on explicit ideas and opinions. (R1, R2, R3)
• Makes a general response including a few relevant ideas from the text.
(R3, R5)
1 1–2 • Very limited response with minimal relation to the text. (R1, R2, R3, R5)
0 0 • No creditable content.
Section B: Composition
Questions 2, 3, 4, 5
EITHER
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table
B to give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
OR
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table
B to give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
OR
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table
B to give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
OR
5 Write a story that includes the words, ‘… I couldn’t put it off any 40
longer …’
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table
B to give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
6 14-16 General
5 11–13 General
4 8–10 General
3 5–7 General
2 3–4 General
1 1–2 General
• Content is occasionally relevant or clear. (W1)
• Structure is limited and ineffective. (W2)
0 0 • No creditable content.
0 0 • No creditable content.