Light Weight Concrete Using Eps: Strength, Replacement
Light Weight Concrete Using Eps: Strength, Replacement
Light Weight Concrete Using Eps: Strength, Replacement
ISSN 2454-6240
www.ijrtm.com
14
Volume 3 Issue 3, June 2017
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (IJRTM)
ISSN 2454-6240
www.ijrtm.com
Where P = ultimate load D = Diameter of the cylinder in 3. M20 2.04 2.31 2.41
mm L = cylinder Length in mm. Making use of the lab data (20%EPS+10%FA)
flexural strength has been calculated using the formula.
f=M/Z in N/mm2
4. M20 1.93 2.14 2.26
Where, M= Bending moment
(30%EPS+10%FA)
Z=I/y= Section modulus
S. Mix designation Average Average
No tensile flexural 5. M20 1.90 2.10 2.13
strength strength (40%EPS+10%FA)
(N/mm2) (N/mm2
28 Days ) 28 6. M20 1.74 1.86 1.91
Days (50%EPS+10%FA)
1. M20 control 2.82 8.78
mix(0%EPS)
2. M20 2.62 8.34
(10%EPS+10%FA) Table-4: Young’s modulus Results based on E=5000√ fck
3. M20 2.52 8.27 8
(20%EPS+10%FA) 6
4. M20 2.44 7.78
4 28 DAYS
(30%EPS+10%FA)
5. M20 2.36 7.10 2 14 DAYS
(40%EPS+10%FA) 0
6. M20 2.12 6.46 0 % 10 20 30 40 50 7 DAYS
(50%EPS+10%FA) EPS % % % % %
EPS EPS EPS EPS EPS
Table-3: Split tensile and flexural strengths
Graph-3: Variation of Young’s modulus
14
12 Average EPS concrete density:
flexural It may be observed that with the addition of EPS Aggregate
10 strength the density of the specimens decrease continuously up to
8 (N/mm2 ) 50% replacement of Granite by EPS Aggregate. The density
6 28 Days decreases with the increase of the age are presented in
Table-4.
4 Average Structural light weight concrete of density of 1812 kg/m3
tensile and the corresponding strengths of about 20.85MPa are
2
strength successfully developed.
0 (N/mm2 ) S. Mix designation Density (Kg/m3) for
0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 28 Days No. day curing period
EPS EPS EPS EPS EPS EPS
Graph-2: Variation of tensile and flexural strength. 7 14 28
From the study, it may be concluded that the split strength days days days
and flexural strength have been observed to decrease 1. M20 control 2474 2453 2428
continuously with the increase in % age of EPS Aggregate mix(0%EPS)
i.e., from 0 to 50% replacement of course and fine aggregate
by EPS Aggregate. 2. M20 2310 2292 2284
An attempt was made to find out the modulus of elasticity (10%EPS+10%FA)
for the various EPB concrete mixes studied and the results 3. M20 2115 2096 2081
were tabulated in Table-4. (20%EPS+10%FA)
S. Mix designation Young’s modulus
No. E=5000√ fck In *104 N/mm
4. M20 1878 1840 1812
(30%EPS+10%FA)
7 14 28 days
days days
5. M20 1710 1693 1653
1. M20 control 2.13 2.57 2.65 (40%EPS+10%FA)
mix(0%EPS)
2. M20 2.06 2.50 2.55 6. M20 1550 1522 1502
(10%EPS+10%FA) (50%EPS+10%FA)
15
Volume 3 Issue 3, June 2017
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (IJRTM)
ISSN 2454-6240
www.ijrtm.com
VI. CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
[1] R. Sri Ravindrarajah & A. J., Tuck “Properties of Hardened Concrete
Containing Treated Expanded Polystyrene Beads”, School of Civil
Engineering, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia.
[2] RamazanDemirboga&,AbdulkadirKan.”Thermal conductivity and
shrinkage properties of modified waste polystyrene aggregate
concretes” Construction and Building Materials 35 ,2012,35, 730 –
734.
[3] D. S. Babu, G. K. Babu, and W. Tiong-Huan, “Properties of
lightweight expanded polystyrene aggregate concretes containing fly
ash,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 35, no.6, pp. 1218–1223,
2005.
[4] Durability of Building Materials and Components. (1999) Edited by
M.A. Lacasse And D.J. Vanier. Institute for Research in Construction,
Ottawa ON, K1A 0R6,Canada , pp. 505-514.National Research
Council Canada 1999
[5] Jay bankim shah, sagar patel U.G. Student, Civil Department,
Shankersinh Vaghela Bapu Institute of Technology,
Unava,Gandhingar-382650.Research Article Impact Factor: 4.226
ISSN: 2319-507X Jay Bankim Shah, IJPRET, 2015; Volume 3 (10):
43-48 IJPRET
[6] IS 383:1970 “Specifications for coarse and fine aggregates from
natural sources for concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[7] S.H. Perry, P.H. Bischoff, K. Yumura, “Mix details and material
behaviour of polystyrene aggregate concrete”, Magazine of Concrete
Research 43, 1991.
[8] IS: 10262: 1982, “Recommended guidelines for concrete mix design”
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
[9] IS 456: 2000 – „Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete‟ ,
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[10] IS 2386:1963 “Methods of tests for aggregates for concrete”, Bureau
of Indian Standards, New Delhi
[11] ACI Committee 2112-98 Standard practice for selecting proportions
for structural light weight concrete. Detroit, American Concrete
Institute.
[12] Miled K. Roy R. L. Sab K. and Boulay C. "Compressive behavior of
an idealized EPS lightweight concrete: size effects and failure mode",
Mechanics of materials, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1031–1046, 2004.
16
Volume 3 Issue 3, June 2017