0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views2 pages

3 HW2 AHP Method

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

HOMEWORK 2

Due date: 25th September 15, 2022


Submission on blackboard in PDF form

Problem 1: AHP
Given an AHP problem with the hierarchy presented in the figure below and the alternatives’
weights are shown in the table 1. It is known that the lower score given in criterion Price, the
better alternative is.

Skincare clinic selection problem hierarchy


Table 1: Alternatives’ weight
Price Technology Qualified staffs Promotion
O2 0.26 0.26 0.12
Zakka 0.56 0.56 0.06
Miss Ba 0.06 0.12 0.25
Ga Spa 0.12 0.06 0.57

Table 2: Comparison of criteria


Price Technology Qualified staffs Promotion
Price 1 3
Technology 3 1 3
Qualified staffs 5 3 1 5
Promotion 1

(a) Develop the weight of alternatives for the criteria Price to complete table 1.
(b) Develop the weight of criteria and check consistency of the pair – wise comparison in
table 2.
(c) Use AHP method to determine the best alternative for this problem

Problem 2: AIJ/AIP method (Group decision)

Given an AHP problem with the hierarchy presented in the figure below and the alternatives’
weights are shown in the table 1. It is known that the lower score given in criterion Price, the
better alternative is.

Skincare clinic selection problem hierarchy


Regarding the weight of criteria, the group of decision makers include Male and Female IU
1 2
students with λ 1= ∧λ2= respectively. And their assessments of criteria are as follows:
3 3

Male ( A1 ) Price Technology Qualified staffs Promotion


Price 1 3
Technologies 5 1 3 5
Qualified staffs 3 1 5
Promotion 1

Female ( A2 ) Price Technology Qualified staffs Promotion


Price 1 5
Technologies 3 1 3
Qualified staffs 7 3 1 7
Promotion 1

Question: Calculate the aggregated weight of criteria using AIJ and AIP method. Check whether
male and female students have reached score consensus or not.

You might also like