A World of Regions
A World of Regions
A World of Regions
LESSON 3: PART I
A WORLD OF REGIONS
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
At the end of the lesson, the students should be able to:
1. define the term “global south” from the Third World;
2. Analyze how a new conception of global relations emerged
from the experience of Latin America; and,
3. Analyze how different Asian states confront the challenges
of globalization and regionalization.
Observing the dramatic in world politics since the end of the Cold War, Peter J.
Katzenstein argues that regions have become critical to contemporary world politics.
This view is in stark contrast to those who focus on the purportedly stubborn
persistence of the nation-state or the inevitable march of globalization. In detailed
studies of technology and foreign investment, domestic and international security, and
cultural diplomacy and popular culture, Katzenstein examines the changing regional
dynamics of Europe and Asia, which are linked to the United States through Germany
and Japan.
NORTH-SOUTH
DIVIDE
- Generally, definitions of the Global North include the United States, Canada,
Western, Europe as well as Australia and New Zealand.
- The Global South is made up of African, Latin America, and developing Asia
including the Middle East.
- The Global South is a term that has been emerging in the transnational and
postcolonial studies to refer to what may also be called the “THE THIRD
WORLD” (i.e., Africa, Latin America, and the developing countries in Asia),
“DEVELOPING COUNTRIES,” “LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES,” and “LESS
DEVELOPED REGIONS.”
- It can also include poorer “SOUTHERN” regions of wealthy “NORTHERN”
countries.
- The Global South is more than the extension of a “METAPHOR for
underdeveloped countries.”
- In general, it refers to those countries’ “interconnected histories of colonialism,
neo-imperialism, and differential economic and social changed through which
large inequalities in living standards, life expectancy, and access to resources is
maintained.”
In the 1960s, ‘70s and ‘80s, scholars divided the earth into three parts: THE
FIRST WORLD, THE SECOND WORLD, and THE THIRD WORLD. The reigning
“THREE WORLDS THEORY,” however, was conceptually incoherent, combining
incommensurate geopolitical and socio-economic features.
The “THIRD WORLD” was defined simultaneously as the non-aligned world and
as the global realm of poverty and under-developed. Poor Soviet allies – Mongolia,
Cuba, North Korea, and North Vietnam (after 1975, Vietnam) – were thus counted as
Third World in economic terms and as Second World in political terms. China’s Cold war
situation was even more ambiguous; a non-industrialized country at the time, it ceased
to be a Soviet ally in 1961 and by the 1980s was no longer an enemy of the United
States. Yet it continued to be commonly mapped as part of the Second World.
Most people in the Third World, through rules by European Colonies, lived far
from global sources of economic, political, and military power. Until very recently, most
were subjugated, most illiterate, and few may have been aware that, even then, they
formed a majority of the world population. But such awareness was growing among
leaders within these poor countries, many of whom had been educated, at least partly,
in Europe or America. This awareness and exposure to Western Culture raised
expectations and hopes and inspired many Third World leaders to try to improve
colonial living conditions and win political independence.