Topic 9 GE 2 Challenge To Democracy
Topic 9 GE 2 Challenge To Democracy
Topic 9 GE 2 Challenge To Democracy
Course Description
The course aims to expose students to different facets of Philippine History through
the lens of eyewitnesses. Rather than rely on the secondary materials such as
textbooks, which is the usual approach in Philippine History, different types of
primary sources will be used – written (qualitative & quantitative), orall, visual,
audio-visual, digital – covering various aspects of Philippine life(political, economic,
cultural). Students are expected to analyze the selected readings contextually and
in terms of content(stated and implied). The end goal is to enable students to
understand and appreciate our rich past by deriving insights from those who were
actually present at the time of the event.
Learning Objectives:
1. Read thoroughly the text of the Proclamation No. 1081, and evaluate the
factors cited by President Marcos that prompted him place the entire country
under Martial Law.
2. Develop an understanding about the characteristics of the Marcos
administration based on the narratives presented by the selected sources
pertaining the Diliman Commune in 1971 and Bonifacio Ilagan’s written
account of his arrest and torture in 1974.
Introduction:
Martial Law: Challenge to Democracy
One of the important challenges faced by the Philippines after the Second World War
was the rehabilitation efforts that allowed for the nation to rise from its war-torn
condition. By officially achieving independence in 1946, the nation needed it strong
relations with the United States for the purpose of obtaining rehabilitation funds for
its newly formed government. From 1946 onwards, the Third Philippine Republic
and its administrations were oriented towards strengthening democracy and its
institutions while taking advantage of the country’s special ties with the American
government. The relationship of the United States and the Philippines was received
with suspicion amongst some in the public. There were views amongst anti-
American stalwarts that economic dependence from foreign aid, mostly coming from
the US government, compromised the independence achieved in 1946 and created a
political atmosphere of subservience to the former colonial power.
1
… the debates on government policies were characterized by an apparent bias
against American intervention in political and economic affairs, apart from the
worsening cases of corruption in the bureaucracy. The nationalists of that time,
representing the different factions of the Left, sustained a momentum of criticism
toward the Philippine government that peaked in the 1960s during the
administration of President Ferdinand E. Marcos. Consequently, the height of
political activism in the 1960s saw the establishment of radical groups such as the
Kabataang Makabayan (November 30, 1964) and the re-established Communist Party
of the Philippines – Marxist-Leninist (December 26, 1968). These groups, along with
others that joined the series of protests, demanded genuine political, economic, and
social changes from the government. Under these circumstances, President Marcos
declared Martial Law on September 21, 1972 in order control and stability over the
nation. This paved the way for the ratification of the 1973 Constitution that would
achieved the realization of the “New Society” or “Bagong Lipunan.”
Primary Source
Judy Taguiwalo was a faculty member of the College of Social Work and Community
Development in the University of the Philippines (UP) Diliman. Her career in the academe
includes service in the university’s administration as Faculty Regent of the UP Board of
Regents from 2009 to 2010 and involvement in the ALL UP Academic Employees Union as
its founding chairperson. She served as the secretary of the Department of Social Welfare and
Development (DSWD) under President Rodrigo Duterte’s administration. Taguiwalo’s life
as an activist began during her college days where she was affiliated with the militant group
Malayang Kilusan ng Kababaihan (MAKIBAKA) and was detained twice during the Marcos
administration.
The excerpt below is part of her recollections of what transpired during the Diliman
Commune in 1971, at the time when she was still a college student of UP. Taguiwalo’s
presentation was entitled “Notes on the 1971 Diliman Commune” and was presented at a
forum entitled “We, the Communards: 40 Years of Continuing Struggle” on February 23,
2001 at Claro M. Recto Hall, UP Diliman. One of the most important points that Prof.
Taguiwalo mentioned below is that the Diliman Commune was a community effort of the
students, progressive teachers, and employees of the university, as well as the sympathetic
residents within the vicinity. The Diliman Commune, which lasted for nine days, began as a
manifestation of support for the jeepney drivers’ strike against the rising oil prices of that
time.
Primary Source
“I was at the Diliman Commune, that historic event on February 1 to 9, 1971; the
event showcasing the power of the militant solidarity of the UP community against
2
military incursions into the university. Too many events had happened since then
and I have bits and pieces of remembrance of those days, forty years ago.
“I was a Sampaguita dormer and remembered the entry of the soldiers into
the dorm and into our rooms with some residents losing watches and wallets after
the soldiers left. A similar thing happened in Kamia and in other dorms.
“The Communards, as we called ourselves then, were ecstatic when low lying
air force helicopters fired after students using the Engineering and AS rooftops as
launching pads released lighted kwitis against the invaders of UP’s airspace. DZUP
became the Tinig ng Malayang Komunidad ng UP Diliman with student announcers
taking turns to give updates on the situation in UP, commentaries on the Marcos
government and playing the infamous tape of Marcos purportedly singing
“Pamulinawen” to Dovie Beams, an American starlet rumoured to have an affair with
the President. Bandilang Pula, the paper of the Diliman Commune, came out
published by the students using the printer of the UP Press.
“The February 4, 1971 issue had the headline “Sinalakay ang UP!” 3 nabaril, 60
sugatan. The left ear of the mast head had the slogan, “Ipaghiganti si Pastor Mesina”
while the right ear said “Struggle against militarization of the campus”. The lead story
of that Feb. 4 issue provided a chronological account of the events leading to the
Diliman Commune.
3
“Feb. 3 Tuesday: Students gathered at the AS steps and agreed to put up
barricades to protest military incursions into the campus. By 10 am, UP was
surrounded by Metrocom soldiers. Tomas Karingal, QCPD chief refused the request
of then UP President Salvador P. Lopez for a dialogue. At 5 pm of that day, Karingal’s
men using tear gas attacked Mollave, Yakal, Areas 14 and 17, Vinzons Hall, the AS
Pavillions, Kamia and Sampaguita. President Lopez according to the Collegian, “ay
nanawagan ng pakikiisang damdamin sa mga mag-aaral ng pamantasan.”
“The February 10 Collegian would report that the barricades were removed at
8 am that morning by virtue of the announcement made by the “Provisional
Directorate ng Demokratikong Komunidad ng Diliman.”
“The same issue noted that protest classes were held in February 8 at the
University Avenue by UP faculty members’ “Temario Rivera, Dolores Feria, Zeus
Salazar, Vic Manarang, Roger Posadas, Gonzalo Jurado, Pepe Miranda” and others.
“In its February 18 issue, the Collegian reported that two of the demands have
been granted by the Board of Regents. Students were given the 7 to 9 pm time slot of
DZUP from Tuesday to Saturday and students were allowed to use the facilities of
the Printing Press at a charge at charge lower than the usual charges.
4
“What for me are the lessons of the 1971 Diliman Commune?
1. The UP community united, initially in support of the demands of the
jeepney drivers for a rollback on gasoline prices and in large number in
defense of the university against military incursions and attack on
academic freedom;
2. At the core of the militancy and perseverance needed to establish and
maintain the Diliman commune for eight days were progressive
organizations of students with support from progressive faculty members
and residents of the communities inside the campus. While there were
segments of students and a few faculty members who publicly expressed
opposition to the commune, the fact that it lasted from Feb. 2 to February
9 and was voluntarily ended by the communards on February 10 indicated
that there was widespread support for the Commune;
3. UP President Salvador P. Lopez’ position against military presence in the
campus and the support of the students by opposition senators including
Ninoy Aquino were significant in broadening the support of the
communards;
4. Cultural forms protest whether through the use of the DZUP, the
publication of the Bandilang Pula, the poorest posters were important in
broadcasting the justness of the Diliman Commune and the demands of
the communards. (After the Diliman Commune, a protest play cum
musical entitled “Barkada” was produced by local artist groups.)
5.
6. The UP coeds, experiencing first hand state violence in the dorms and in
on with them in the university’s traditional “Cadena de Amor” and as
muses in the Lantern Parade. They came forward as communards ready to
defend the university.”
The series during the First Quarter Storm in 1970, the Diliman Commune from
February 1 to 9, 1971, and the Plaza Miranda bombing on August 21, 1971 were
among the most compelling reasons that led President Marcos to suspend the writ
of habeas corpus and ultimately, to place the entire nation under Martial Law on
September 21, 1972. Through the latter, the president managed to obtain full
control of the government with the complete backing of the military. Moreover,
the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus of the writ habeas
corpus and the declaration of Martial Law became vital tools for the president to
5
silence all forms of opposition against his administration and to establish his
authoritarian rule over the nation.
Following is an excerpt from the Proclamation No. 1081 which reiterated the
state of lawlessness in the country; primarily caused by the looming Communist
insurgency. In these passages from the proclamation, the president focused and
expounded on the important details which proved that the threat of Communism
was imminent. It is interesting to note that President Marcos cited specific data
on successive Communist-led bombings in 1972 and the growing number of
recruits gained by the CPP and its military arm, the New People’s Army (NPA).
Primary Source
Malacañang
Manila
Proclamation No. 1081
6
recruiting and enlistment of new adherents from among our peasantry, laborers,
professionals, intellectuals, students, and mass media personnel, and through such
sustained are careful recruitment and enlistment have succeeded in spreading and
expanding, their control and influence over almost every segment and level of our
society throughout the land in their ceaseless effort to erode and weaken the political,
social, economic, legal and moral foundations of our existing government, and to
influence, manipulate and move peasant, labor, student and terroristic organizations
under their influence or control to commit, as in fact they have committed and still
are committing, acts of violence, depredations, sabotage and injuries against our duly
constituted authorities, against the members of our law enforcement agencies, and
worst of all, against the peaceful members of our society;
WHEREAS, in order to carry out, as in fact they have carried out, their premeditated
plan to stage, undertake and wage a full scale armed insurrection and rebellion in
this country, these lawless elements have organized, established and are now
maintaining a well trained, well armed and highly indoctrinated and greatly
expanded insurrectionary force, popularly known as the “New People’s Army”,
which has since vigorously pursued and still is vigorously pursuing a relentless and
ruthless armed struggle against our duly constituted government and whose
unmitigated forays, raids, ambuscades, assaults, and reign of terror and acts of
lawlessness in the rural areas and in our urban centers brought about the treacherous
and cold-blooded assassination of innocent civilians, military personnel of the
government and local public officials in many parts of the country, notably in the
Cagayan Valley, in Central Luzon, in the Southern Tagalog Region, in the Bicol Area,
in the Visayas and in Mindanao, and whose daring and wanton guerrilla activities
have generated and sown fear and panic among our people; have created a climate
of chaos and disorder, produced a state of political, social, psychological and
7
economic instability in our land, and have inflicted great suffering and irreparable
injury to persons and property in our society”;
WHEREAS, these lawless elements having taken up arms against our duly
constituted government and against our people, and having committed and are still
committing acts of armed insurrection and rebellion consisting of armed raids,
forays, sorties, ambushes, wanton acts of muliders, spoilage, plunder, looting, arsons,
destruction of public and private buildings, and attacks against innocent and
defenseless civilian lives and property, all of which activities have seriously
endangered and continue to endanger public order and safety and the security of the
nation, and acting with cunning and manifest precision and deliberation and without
regard to the health, safety and well-being of the people, are now implementing their
plan to cause widespread, massive and systematic destruction and paralization of
vital public utilities and services, particularly water systems, sources of electrical
power, communication and transportation facilities, to the great detriment, suffering,
injury and prejudice of our people and the nation and to generate a deep
psychological fear and panic among our people;
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court in the cases brought before it, docketed as G.R. Nos.
L-33964, L-33965, L-33973, L-33982, L-34004, L-34013, L-34039, L-34265, and L-34339,
as a con- sequence of the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus by
me as President of the Philippines in my Proclamation No.889, dated August 21, 1971,
8
as amended, has found that in truth and in fact there exists an actual insurrection and
rebellion in the country by a sizeable group of men who have publicly risen in arms
to overthrow the government. Here is what the Supreme Court said in its decision
promulgated on December 11, 1971:
“The fifties saw a comparative lull in Communist acti- vities, insofar as peace and
order were concerned. Still, on June 20, 1957, Republic Act No.1700, otherwise
known as the Anti-Subversion Act, was approved, upon the grounds stated in the
very preamble of said statute -that
9
“In the language of the Report on Central Luzon, submitted, on September 4, 1971,
by the Senate Ad Hoc Committee of Seven-copy of which Report was filed in these
cases by the petitioners herein-
“The years following 1963 saw the successive emergence in the country of several
mass organizations, notably the Lapiang Manggagawa (now the Socialist Party of
the Philippines) among the workers; the Malayang Samahan ng Mga Magsasaka
(MASAKA) among the peasantry; the Kabataang Makabayan (KM) among the
youth/students; and the Movement for the Advancement of Nationalism (MAN)
among the intellectuals/professionals, the PKP has exerted all-out effort to
infiltrate, influence and utilize these organizations in promoting its radical brand of
nationalism.”
“Meanwhile, the Communist leaders in the Philippines had been split into two (2)
groups, one of which -com- posed mainly of young radicals, constituting the Maoist
faction -reorganized the Communist Party of the Philip- pines early in 1969 and
established a New People’s Army. This faction adheres to the Maoist concept of the
‘Protracted People’s War’ or ‘War of National Liberation.’ Its ‘Programme for a
People’s Democratic Revolution’ states, inter alia:
“The Central task of any revolutionary movement is to seize political power. The
Communist Party of the Philippines assumes this task at a time that both the
international and national situations are favorable to taking the road of armed
revolution…’
“In the year 1969, the NPA had-according to the records of the Department of
National Defense-conducted raids, resorted to kidnappings and taken part in other
violent incidents numbering over 230, in which it inflicted 404 casualties, and, in
turn, suffered 243 losses. In 1970, its record of violent incidents was about the same,
but the NPA casualties more than doubled.
“At any rate, two (2) facts are undeniable: (a) all Communists, whether they belong
to the traditional group or to the Maoist faction, believe that force and violence are
indispensable to the attainment of their main and ultimate objective, and act in
accordance with such belief, although they disagree on the means to be used at a
given time and in a particular place; and (b) there is a New People’s Army, other, of
course, than the armed forces of the Republic and antagonistic thereto. Such New
10
People’s Army is per se proof of the existence of a rebellion, especially considering
that its establishment was announced publicly by the reorganized CPP. Such
announcement is in the nature of a public challenge to the duly constituted
authorities and may be likened to a declaration of war, sufficient to establish a war
status or a condition of belligerency, even before the actual commencement of
hostilities.
“We entertain, therefore, no doubts about the existence of a sizeable group of men
who have publicly risen in arms to overthrow the government and have thus been
and still are engaged in rebellion against the Government of the Philippines.”
WHEREAS, it is evident that there is throughout the land a state of anarchy and
lawlessness, chaos and disorder, turmoil and destruction of a magnitude equivalent
to an actual war between the forces of our duly constituted government and the New
People’s Army and their satellite organizations because of the unmitigated forays,
raids, ambuscades, assaults, violence, murders, assassinations, acts of terror, deceits,
coercions, threats, intimidations, treachery, machinations, arsons, plunders and
depredations committed and being committed by the aforesaid lawless elements who
have pledged to the whole nation that they will not stop their dastardly effort and
scheme until and unless they have fully attained their primary and ultimate purpose
of forcibly seizing political and state power in this country by overthrowing our
present duly constituted government, by destroying our democratic way of life and
our established secular and religious institutions and beliefs, and by supplanting our
existing political, social, economic, legal and moral order with an entirely new one
whose form of govern- ment, whose notion of individual rights and family relations,
and whose political, social, economic and moral precepts are based on the Marxist-
Leninist-Maoist teachings and beliefs ;
WHEREAS, the Supreme Court in its said decision concluded that the unlawful
activities of the aforesaid lawless elements actually pose a clear, present and grave
danger to public safety and the security of the nation and in support of that
conclusion found that:
11
terrorist tactics and resorted to the assassination of uncooperative local officials ;
that, in line with this policy, the insurgents have killed 5 mayors, 20 barrio captains
and 3 chiefs of police; that there were fourteen (14) meaningful bombing incidents
in the Greater Manila area in 1970; that the Constitutional Convention Hall was
bombed on June 12, 1971; that, soon after the Plaza Miranda incident, the N A W
ASA main pipe at the Quezon City San Juan boundary, was bombed; that this was
followed closely by the bombing of the Manila City Hall, the COMELEC Building,
the Congress Building and the MERALCO substation at Cubao, Quezon City; and
that the respective residences of Senator Jose J. Roy and Congressman Eduardo
Cojuangco were, likewise, bombed, as were the MERALCO main office premises,
along Ortigas Avenue, and the Doctor’s Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Building, in Caloocan
City.
12
“Subsequent events xxx have also proven xxx the threat to public safety posed by
the New People’s Army. Indeed, it appears that, since August 21, 1971, it had in
Northern Luzon six (6) encounters and staged one (1) raid, in consequences OJ
which seven (7) soldiers lost their lives and two (2) other: were wounded, whereas
the insurgents suffered five (5) casualties; that on August 26, 1971, a well-armed
group of NPA trained by defector Lt. Victor Corpus, attacked the very command
post of TF LAWIN in Isabela, destroying two (2) helicopters and one (1) plane, and
wounding one (1) soldier that the, NPA had in Central Luzon a total of four (4)
encounters, with two (2) killed and three .(3) wounded on the side of the
Government, one (1) BSDU killed and three (3 KM-SDK leaders, an unidentified
dissident, and Commander Panchito, leader of the dissident group were killed; that
on August 26, 1971, there was an encounter in the barrio of San Pedro, Iriga City,
Camarines Sur, between the PC and the NPA, in which a PC and two (2) KM
members were killed, that the current disturbances in Cotabato and the Lanao
provinces have been rendered more complex by the involvement of the CPP /NPA,
for, in mid-1971, a KM group, headed by Jovencio Esparagoza, contacted the Higa-
onan tribes, in their settlement in Magsaysay, Misamis Oriental, and offered them
books, pamphlets and brochures of Mao Tse Tung, as well as conducted teach-ins in
the reservation; that Esparagoza
“It should, also, be noted that adherents of the CPP and its front organizations are,
according to intelligence findings, l definitely capable of preparing powerful
explosives out of locally available materials; that the bomb used in the
Constitutional Convention Hall was a ‘Claymore’ mine, a powerful explosive
device used by the U.S. Army, believed to have been one of many pilfered from the
Subic Naval Base a few days before; that the President had received intelligence
information to the effect that there was a July-August Plan involving a wave of
assassinations, kidnappings, terrorism and mass destruction of property and that
an extraordinary occurrence would signal the beginning of said event; that the
rather serious condition of peace and order in Mindanao, particularly in Cotabato
and Lanao, demanded the presence therein of forces sufficient to cope with the
situation; that a sizeable part of our armed forces discharges other functions; and
that the expansion of the CPP activities from Central Luzon to other parts of the
country, particularly Manila and its suburbs, the Cagayan Valley , Ifugao,
Zambales, Laguna, Quezon and the Bicol Region, required that the rest of our
armed forces be spread thin over a wide area.”
13
introducing into the country at Digoyo Point, Palanan, Isabela and at other
undetermined points along the Pacific coastline of Luzon, a substantial quantity of
war material consisting of M-1.4 rifles estimated to be some 3,500 pieces, several
dozens of 40 mm rocket launchers which are said to be Chicom copies of a Russian
prototype rocket launcher, large quantities of 80 mm rockets and ammunitions, and
other combat paraphernalia, of which wa’r ma- terial some had been discovered and
captured by government military forces, and the bringing and introduction of such
quantity and type of war material into the country is a mute but eloquent proof of
the sinister plan of the aforesaid lawless elements to hasten the escalation of their
present revolutionary war against the Filipino people and their legitimate
government ;
WHEREAS, in the execution of their overall revolutionary plan, the aforesaid lawless
elements have prepared and released to their various field commanders and Party
workers a document captioned “REGIONAL PROGRAM OF AC’TION 1972”, a copy
of which was captured by elements of the 116th and 119th Philippine Constabulary
Companies on June 18, 1972 at Barrio Taringsing, Cordon, Isabela, the text of which
reads as follows:
“The following Regional Program of Action for 1972 is pre- pared to be carried out
as part of the overall plan of the party to foment discontent and precipitate the tide
of nationwide mass revolution. The fascist Marcos and his reactionary members of
Congress is expected to prepare themselves for the 1973 hence:
“January -June:
“1. Intensify recruitment of new party members especially from the workers-
farmers class. Cadres are being trained in order to organize the different regional
bureaus. These bureaus must concentrate on mass action and organization to
promote advancement of the mass revolutionary movement. Reference is made to
the “Borador ng Programa sa Pagkilos at Ulat ng Panlipunang Pagsisiyasat” as
approved by the Central Committee.
“2. Recruit and train armed city partisans and urban guerrillas and organize them
into units under Party cadres and activists of mass organizations. These units must
undergo specialized training on explosives and demolition and other forms of
sabotage.
“3. Intensify recruitment and training of new members for the New Peoples Army
in preparation for limited offensive in selected areas in the regions.
14
“4. Support a more aggressive program of agitation and propaganda against the
reactionary armed forces and against the Con Con.
“July -August:
“During this period the party expects the puppet Marcos government to allow
increase in bus rates thus aggravating further the plight of students, workers and
the farmers.
“1. All Regional Party Committees must plan for a general strike movement. The
Regional Operational Commands must plan for armed support if the fascist armed
forces of Marcos will try to intimidate the oppressed Filipino masses.
“2. Conduct sabotage against schools, colleges and universities hiking tuition fees.
“3. Conduct sabotage and agitation against puppet judges and courts hearing cases
against top party leaders.
“4. Create regional chaos and disorder to dramatize the inability of the fascist
Marcos government to keep and maintain peace and order thru:
“a) Robbery and hold-up of banks controlled by American imperialists and those
belonging to the enemies of the people.
“September-October :
“1. Intensify sabotage and bombing of government buildings and embassies and
other utilities:
“a) Congress
“e) US Embassy
15
“f) Facilities of US Bases
“i) PLDT
“3. Assassinate high government officials of Congress, Judiciary, Con Con and
private individuals sympathetic to puppet Marcos.
“4. Establish provincial revolutionary government in towns and cities with the
support of the masses.
“5. With the sympathetic support of our allies, establish provisional provincial
revolutionary governments.
“CENTRAL COMMITTEE
COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE
PHILIPPINES”
16
Quiapo, Manila, on September 5, causing death to one woman and injuries to some
38 individuals; and of the City Hall of Manila on September 8; of the watermains in
San Juan, Rizal on Sept, 12, of the San Miguel building on Makati, Rizal on Sept, 14;
and of the Quezon City Hall on September 18, 1972, as well as the at- tempted
bombing of the Congress Building on July 18, when an unexploded bomb was found
in the Senate Publication Division and the attempted bombing of the Department of
Foreign Affairs on August 30,
WHEREAS, in line with the same “REGIONAL PROGRAM OF ACTION 1972”, the
aforesaid lawless elements have also fielded in the Greater Manila area several of
their “Sparrow Units” or “Simbad Units” to undertake liquidation missions against
ranking government officials, military personnel and prominent citizens and to
further heighten the destructions and depredations already inflicted by them upon
our innocent people, all of which are being deliberately done to sow terror, fear and
chaos amongst our population and to make the government look so helpless and
incapable of protecting the lives and property of our people;
WHEREAS, the Mindanao Independence Movement with the active material and
financial assistance of foreign political and economic interests, is engaged in an open
and unconcealed attempt to establish by violence and force a separate and
independent political state out of the islands of Mindanao and Sulu which are
historically, politically and by law parts of the territories and within the jurisdiction
and sovereignty of the Republic of the Philippines;
WHEREAS, because of the aforesaid disorder resulting from armed clashes, killings,
massacres, arsons, rapes, pillages, destruction of whole villages and towns and the
inevitable cessation of agricultural and industrial operations, all of which have been
brought about by the violence inflicted by the Christians, the Muslims, the “Ilagas”,
the “Barracudas”, and the Mindanao Independence Movement against each other
and against our government troops, a great many parts of the islands of Mindanao
and Sulu are virtually now in a state of actual war;
WHEREAS, the violent disorder in Mindanao and Sulu has todate resulted in the
killing of over 1,000 civilians and about 2,000 armed Muslims and Christians, not to
mention the more than five hundred thousand of injured, displaced and homeless
17
persons as well as the great number of casualties among our government troops, and
the paralyzation of the economy of Mindanao and Sulu;
WHEREAS, I have already utilized the first two courses of action, first, by calling
upon the armed forces to suppress the aforesaid lawless violence, committing to that
specific job almost 50% of the entire armed forces of the country and creating several
task forces for that purpose such as Task Force Saranay, Task Force Palanan, Task
Force Isarog, Task Force Pagkakaisa and Task Force Lancaf, and, second, by
suspending the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus on August 21, 1971 up to
January 11, 1972, but inspite of all that, both courses of action were found inadequate
and ineffective to contain, much less solve, the present rebellion and lawlessness in
the country as shown by the fact that :
1. That radical left has increased the number and area of operation of its front
organizations and has intensified the recruitment and training of new adherents in
the urban and rural areas especially from among the youth;
2. The Kabataang Makabayan (KM), the most militant and outspoken front
organization of the radical left, has in- creased the number of its chapters from 200 as
of the end of 1970 to 317 as of July 31, 1972 and its membership from 10,000 as of the
end of 1970 to 15,000 as of the end of July , 1972, showing very clearly the rapid
growth of the Communist movement in this country;
18
3. The Samahang Demokratiko Ng Kabataan (SDK), another militant and outspoken
front organization of the radical left, has also increased the number of its chapters
from an insignificant number at the end of 1970 to 159 as of the end of July, 1972 and
has now a membership of some 1,495 highly indoctrinated, intensely committed and
almost fanatically devoted individuals;
4. The New People’s Army, the most active and the most violent and ruthless military
arm of the radical left, has increased its total strength from an estimated 6,500
(composed of 560 regulars, 1,500 combat support and 4,400 service support) as of
January 1, 1972 to about 7,900 (composed of 1,028 regulars, 1,800 combat support and
5,025 service support) as of July 31, 1972, showing a marked increase in its regular
troops of over 100% in such a short period of six months;
6. The disappearance and dropping out of school of some 3,000 high school and
college students and who are report- ed to have joined with the insurgents for
training in the handling of firearms and explosives ;
7. The bringing and introduction into the country of substantial war material
consisting of military hardware and sup- plies through the MV Karagatan at Digoyo
Point, Palanan, lsabela, and the fact that many of these military hardware and
supplies are now in the hands of the insurgents and are being used against our
government troops;
8. The infiltration and control of the media by persons who are sympathetic to the
insurgents and the consequent intensification of their propaganda assault against the
government and the military establishment of the government;
19
WHEREAS, the rebellion and armed action undertaken by these lawless elements of
the communist and other armed aggrupations organized to overthrow the Republic
of the Philippines by armed violence and force have assumed the magnitude of an
actual state of war against our people and the Republic of the Philippines;
In addition, I do hereby order that all persons presently detained, as well as all others
who may hereafter be similarly detained for the crimes of insurrection or rebellion,
and all other crimes and offenses committed in furtherance or on the occasion thereof,
or incident thereto, or in connection therewith, for crimes against national security
and the law of nations, crimes against public order, crimes involving usurpation of
authority, rank, title and improper use of names, uniforms and insignia, crimes
committed by public officers, and for such other crimes as will be enumerated in
Orders that I shall subsequently promulgate, as well as crimes as a consequence of
any violation of any decree, order or regulation promulgated by me personally or
promulgated upon my direction shall be kept under detention until otherwise
ordered re- leased by me or by my duly designated representative.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the
Republic of the Philippines to be affixed.
Done in the City of Manila, this 21st day of September, in the year of Our Lord,
nineteen hundred and seventy two.
SOURCE: WWW.GAZETTE.GOV.PH/1972/09/21/PROCLAMATION-NO-1081
DATE VIEWED: 9/28/2020
20
BERTO V. REYES
The day after declaring Martial Law, President Marcos released a total of six General Orders
that furthered the implementation of Proclamation No. 1081. These orders indicated the
complete control of certain government functions under the president, allowed the arrest of
individuals deemed as threat to the government and the public, enforced curfew hours,
banned firearms, and curtailed the freedom of assembly.
The following is an excerpt from General Order No. 1 which saw a “greater control
and more effective control over the entire Government” and consolidated all military
command under the president’s office. The aim of the order was to allow the president to
directly supervise operations that ideally “restored peace and stability over the nation in the
shortest time possible.”
Primary Source
“WHEREAS, martial law has been declared under Proclamation No. 1081 dated Sept.
21, 1972 and is now in effect throughout the land:
21
expedient to take to contain and resolve the existing national emeergency and for the
interest of the public.
“Done in the City of Manila, this 22nd day of September in the year of our
Lord, nineteen hundred and seventy-two.”
The author of the account cited is Bonifacio P. Ilagan, a Martial Law veteran. Ilagan was
immersed into activism while an undergraduate student of the University of the Philippines
Diliman. Being one of the founders of the Kabataan Makabayan (KM) in UP, he was among
the numerous individuals who participated in the Diliman Commune of 1971. At the time
when the government conducted mass arrests of activists, he fell victim to abduction by the
Philippine Constabulary and could still vividly recall the ruthlessness of torture which he
had to endure. After Martial Law years, Mr. Ilagan wrote screenplays for films which
highlight pressing social issues and realities. These include The Flor Contemplacion Story
(1995), Dukot (2009), Sigwa (2010), and Migrante (2012). Moreover, he is also an established
playwright who received recognition from the Don Carlos Palanca Awards for Literature,
the Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP) Literary Contest and, the Palihang Aurelio V.
Tolentino.
The narrative below is Ilagan’s recollection of his seizure by government forces. His
memory of what happened after the arrest would show the brutality of government
interrogators in applying torture methods in exchange for information about the Communist
leaders and their whereabouts.
Primary Source
“In 1969, entering the University of the Philippines in Diliman, I immediately took
notice of the vibrant atmosphere of free discussion of social issues and politics in the
campus, which was actually propelled by just a small group of student activists. They
22
were, nonetheless, articulate and quite knowledgeable. They were daring in their
radical indictment of the bankrupt and elite-dominated Philippine society. They
spoke with passion about standing up and figthing for “genuine freedom and
democracy,” as well as for the “rights and welfare of the workers and peasants and
all the downtrodden.” I felt obliged, as a serious student who shared in the proud
brand of being a UP scholar, to know what it all meant.
“By late 1970, the small group had become a mass movement in the campus.
And I was already one of them who had cast my lot in the “struggle for national
democracy.” In February 1971, when students boycotted classes in sympathy with
the jeepney driver’s strike against the oil price hike and leading to the establishment
of the Diliman Commune, I was already the chairman of the Kabataang Makabayan
chapter in the campus and the outlying communities.
“On account of the punitive actions of the police and military against critics
and activists, and Marcos’ ominous pronouncements and threats, we were convinced
that everything was coming to a head. Months before Marcos suspended the
privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, I joined the stream of activists going
underground, I helped build the network of the people’s resistance movement
against tyranny and the creeping fascism of the Marcos government.
“On the second year of martial law, April 1974, I was captured in a dawn raid
of our underground house in Novaliches by the dreaded 5th Constabulary Security
Unit (CSU). Arrested with me were Jose “Pete” Lacaba and Prof. Dolores Stephens
Feria of the UP English Department.
“As soon as the military intelligence agents broke into the house, they mauled
Pete and me, forcing us to admit to our “ranks” in the underground movement and
to tell them where our other comrades stayed. Because we did not give them the
information, they beat us up some more, thrusting the barrel of their rifles against
our body, punching, slapping, and kicking us.
After some hours, we were handcuffed and brought to the headquarters of the 5th
CSU in Camp Crame where the torture continued. The physical punishment accompanied
the persistent questions: Who were the members of our group, especially the writers and
journalists. Where were our other undergound houses. Where was Jose Ma. Sison. At times,
we were hit simply to degrade us, and to prove that they had the power of life and death
over us – and this they made sure we understood, because it was, they said, martial law, and
they were the law.
23
“The ‘San Juanico Bridge’ treatment (the torturers themsleves called it so) was
named after the bridge that connected the islands of Leyte and Samar. Marcos had
built it in 1969 as a love gift for his wife Imelda who hails from Leyte. “Lie in the air
(higa sa hangin)!,” the interrogators ordered me. It meant that the heels of my feet
and my nape had to rest on separate steel cots, leaving my entire body hanging. I had
to maintain that position while they asked questions. And whenever their patience
wore out, they hit my stomach until I’d drop to the floor. And back to “higa sa
hangin.” When I could no longer do it out of sheer exhaustion, they beat me up on
the floor.
“In another session, Aguinaldo also led the group that mocked me while a
sergeant named Cervantes applied soap to a stick to insert through my penis. As
they were performing the torture, I cried out “Oh my God!” They laughed and said
that I was a Communist, and that Communists were not supposed to believe in God
(the remark was the second instance when I was told not to invoke the name of God).
Then a senior officer came and stopped the torture. He accompanied me to his air-
conditioned room, offered me drinks and started to engage me in a conversation. He
tried to sound like a father reminding a son to think of the future. And that future
could be good for me if I only cooperated with them. In short, it was the “good cop,
bad cop” method they thought could work on me. The elderly officer sent me back
to my cell to “think it over” and to call for him. When I did not call for him the
following day, the torture resumed.
“The bottle treatment had me seated, legs stretched out and resting on another
chair. A lieutenant started hitting both my legs with a bottle while he asked questions.
The beating lasted for what seemed like hours, with other intelligence agents taking
turns hitting my legs. After the session, my legs felt very heavy and sore. Taking off
my pants in the cell, I saw how my legs had become like the skin of a lechon. The
following days, the color turned purple and dark blue.
“One time, they drove me out of Camp Crame. In a vacant lot, I was ordered
to run. I knew that If I did, they’d have an excuse to shoot me. I did not. Back in the
camp, the torture resumed. The following days, I urinated blood.
“I was released sometime in early June 1976 together with Pete, Prof. Feria,
Myrna Hombrebueno, and Rosario Agcaoili. Prior to that day, we were congratulated
by Colononel Aure, the Commanding officer of the 5th CSU. He asked to “leave
24
everything behind and charge it to experience.” On June 12, acclaimed as the day of
Philippine Independence, we were front-page news. We were exhibited by the
Marcos martial law regime to show how the New Society had become magnanimous
to “political offenders.”
[end]
Graded Activity:
1. Enumerate the reasons or factors cited by President Marcos that led him placed the
Philippines under Martial Law.
2. Discuss briefly – in brief essay form – how and why UP students, teachers, and
employees set up the Diliman Commune in 1971 which led to bloody confrontation
with the armed government agents.
Instruction:
Send your answers to: sarrealsoquino@outlook.ph
25