Creep Behavior of High
Creep Behavior of High
of technology
Academic Dissertation which, with due permission of the KTH Royal Institute of Technology,
is submitted for public defence for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy on Friday the 18th of
december 2020, 09.00, Public defense by Zoom.
ISBN 978-91-7873-728-4
TRITA-ITM-AVL 2020:48
1
Sammanfattning
Avhandlingen fokuserar på krypbeteende hos fyra gjutna material som används till avgasgrenrör i
lastbilsmotorer. Dessa material inbegriper två ferritiska segjärn, betecknade SiMo51 och SiMo1000,
ett austenitiskt segjärn, D5S, och ett austenitiskt gjutstål, HK30. Gjutjärnen är rika på kol och har en
mikrostruktur som utöver matrisen består av grafitnoduler och olika utskiljningar, de senare
huvudsakligen karbider och intermetalliska faser. Gjutstålet har ett lägre kolinnehåll och saknar därför
grafitnoduler, men innehåller andra utskiljningar. Under drift cyklas avgasgrenrören termiskt upp till
800 °C i ett låst tillstånd, eller mer specifikt fastskruvade till motorblocket. Lastfallet och miljön ger
upphov till krypdeformation, utmattning, oxidation och andra förändringar i mikrostrukturen.
Generellt sett har utvecklingen mot mer miljövänliga lastbilsmotorer lett till högre avgastemperaturer
vilket i sin tur innebär högre krav på materialen.
Det huvudsakliga målet med studien var att utreda krypbeteende och relaterade fenomen hos de
inkluderade materialen (se ovan). Ett sekundärt mål var även att jämföra resultat från tre olika typer
av kryptester: i) SRTC (stress relaxations with thermal cycling) är ett sätt att framkalla
spänningsrelaxationer i materialet genom att cykla det termiskt i ett låst tillstånd, ii) STT (sequential
tensile test) är ett dragprov vid konstant temperatur under vilket töjningshastigheten ändras vid givna
töjningsnivåer, iii) CL (constant-load creep test) är den traditionella krypprovningsmetoden, som
innebär konstant last och temperatur. SRTC och STT är avsedda som snabba och billiga
krypprovningsmetoder medan CL-metoden generellt betraktas som långsam och dyr. Resultat från de
tre metoderna jämfördes regelmässigt i s.k Norton plots, det vill säga logaritmiska krypdiagram med
spänning och töjningshastighet.
Resultat från i) SRTC (i kompression) och ii) STT (i drag) överensstämde generellt mycket väl vilket
indikerar att krypning i materialen inte beror av lastriktning. Utöver detta var töjningshastigheten som
registrerades i SRTC-testerna konstant med antalet cykler. Båda dessa upptäckter underlättar
modellering av cyklisk krypning i materialen, ett ämne som dock inte ingick i avhandlingen. Det finns
diskrepanser mellan den krypdata som erhölls med CL-metoden och den som erhölls med de snabbare
metoderna (STT och SRTC). Dessa kunde inte fullt ut förklaras, men olika alternativ diskuterades.
Hursomhelst är det givet att den tidsberoende krypskada som utvecklas under ett långsamt krypprov
(CL) inte kan uppstå efter snabba spänningsrelaxationer eller dragprov.
De mikrostrukturella förändringar som skedde under krypning dokumenterades genom LOM-, SEM-
och EBSD-mikroskopi, med flera olika tekniker för preparering och etsning.
I CL-provning vid 700 °C uppvisade SiMo51 primärkryp som mer eller mindre direkt följdes av
tertiärkryp. Tertiärkrypet var i sin tur uppdelat i två subregimer, av vilka den första assoceriades med
skada från kaviteter runt grafitnoduler och runt korngränser/karbider, och den andra med större
sprickor mellan grafitnodulerna. Den oxidation som skedde under krypning var påtaglig, men inte
tillräcklig för att förklara uppdelningen i två tertiärkrypregimer. Oxidationen på provytan och runt
nodulerna studerades explicit. Oxiden som helhet bestod av flera individuella lager som kunde
identiferas genom att kombinera EDX-data och termodynamiska beräkningar.
Både D5S och HK30 CL-testades vid 750 °C för att reflektera en högre driftstemperatur hos dessa
material jämfört med SiMo51. Efter långvarig krypexponering uppvisade HK30 typiska krypkaviteter
vid korngränserna, utskiljning av sigma-fas och G-fas, små oxidinträgningar och ett tunt
rekristalliserat lager på provytan. D5S å sin sida uppvisade olika typer av kaviteter/porer runt
grafitnodulerna, liknande den skada som noterades för SiMo51 vid 700 °C. Brottmekanismen bestod
av skjuvsprickor som propagerade mellan grafitnodulerna. Olika utskiljningar bildades under
krypexponeringen.
2
Abstract
This thesis focuses on creep of four cast materials intended for exhaust manifolds in heavy-duty truck
engines. Two of the materials are ferritic ductile cast irons, SiMo51 and SiMo1000, one is an
austenitic ductile cast iron, D5S, and another one is an austenitic cast steel, HK30. The ductile cast
irons, rich in carbon, have a microstructure with graphite nodules and precipitates, mainly carbides
and intermetallics. The cast steel, on the other hand, being meagre in carbon, has precipitates but lacks
graphite nodules. During service, the exhaust components are thermally cycled up to 800 °C in a
locked stated, bolted to an engine block. This gives rise to creep deformation, fatigue, oxidation and
microstructural changes. Driven by the development of environmental friendly engines of lower
emissions, the exhaust gas temperature is increasing, continuously leading to higher demands on the
materials.
The main aim was to investigate the creep behavior and related phenomena of the included materials.
A secondary aim was to compare results from three types of tests, i) SRTC (stress relaxations with
thermal cycling), provoking stress relaxations in a locked specimen subjected to thermal cycling, ii)
STT (sequential tensile test), changing the strain rate at selected strain levels during a tensile test at a
selected temperature, iii) CL (constant-load creep test), i.e. traditional creep testing, applying a
constant load at a given temperature. SRTC and STT are intended as quick and cheap methods while
CL is generally considered slow and associated with high costs. Results of the three methods were
regularly compared in Norton plots, i.e. double logarithmic plots of stress and strain rate.
Results of i) SRTC (in compression) and ii) STT (in tension) were generally in very close agreement
which indicates that creep of the included materials is independent of loading direction. In addition,
the creep rates obtained by SRTC were also constant with number of cycles. Both findings facilitate
modeling of cyclic creep, although this was not in the scope of the present thesis. There were
discrepancies between data sets of CL and SRTC/STT which could not be explained, although several
reasons were discussed. In addition, the time-dependent creep damage which develops during a slow
CL test is always missed in quick stress relaxation tests or tensile tests.
The microstructural events taking place during creep were documented using LOM, SEM and EBSD
microscopy techniques, with various etching and sample preparation procedures.
When CL tested at 700 °C, SiMo51 showed primary creep, more or less directly followed by tertiary
creep. The tertiary creep regime was in turn divided into two stages of which the first was associated
with the formation of typical creep cavities around the graphite nodules and at the grain boundaries,
and the second associated with larger cracks between the graphite nodules. Oxidation was significant
but not enough to be held responsible for the tertiary creep stages. The oxidation on the surface and
around the graphite nodules was explicitly studied. Layered oxides were identified by combining
EDX data with thermodynamic calculations.
Both D5S and HK30 were CL tested at 750 °C, reflecting a higher service temperature of these
materials compared with SiMo51. After prolonged creep exposure, HK30 exhibited typical creep
cavitation at the grain boundaries, precipitation of sigma phase and G phase, oxide intrusions and
recrystallization in a thin layer at the specimen surface. D5S exhibited various types of cavities/voids
around the graphite nodules (like SiMo51 at 700 °C) and fracture occurred by shear cracks growing
nodule-to-nodule. Various precipitates developed during creep.
Keywords: Creep, creep behaviour, creep damage, ductile cast iron, high-alloyed austenitic cast
steel, thermal cycling, tensile testing, stress relaxation, oxidation, precipitation.
3
Contents
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 5
1.1. Development of exhaust manifold materials ................................................................................................... 6
1.1.1. SiMo51 ......................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.1.2. SiMo1000 ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.1.3. D5S ............................................................................................................................................................... 8
1.1.4. HK30 ............................................................................................................................................................ 9
2. Objectives ......................................................................................................................................................... 10
3. Theory............................................................................................................................................................... 11
3.1 The origin of creep ......................................................................................................................................... 11
3.2. Constant-load creep tests and creep curves ................................................................................................... 11
3.3. Five-power-law creep .................................................................................................................................... 13
3.4. Creep mechanisms, cavitation and rupture .................................................................................................... 14
3.5 Cyclic creep .................................................................................................................................................... 16
3.6. Creep and tensile testing of ductile cast iron ................................................................................................. 16
3.7. Oxidation of Fe, Fe-Si and Fe-C-Si-Mo (SiMo51) ........................................................................................ 17
3.8. SRTC (stress relaxations with thermal cycling) ............................................................................................ 18
3.9. STT (sequential tensile testing) ..................................................................................................................... 20
4. Experiments ...................................................................................................................................................... 21
4.1. Specimen preparation .................................................................................................................................... 21
4.2. SRTC (stress relaxations with thermal cycling) ............................................................................................ 22
4.2.1. Temperature Gradient ................................................................................................................................. 23
4.2.2. Extensometer measurements....................................................................................................................... 24
4.3. Sequential tensile test (STT) .......................................................................................................................... 27
4.4. Constant-load (CL) creep test ........................................................................................................................ 28
4.5. Regular, “non-sequential”, tensile tests ......................................................................................................... 29
4.6. Oxidation tests ............................................................................................................................................... 29
4.7 EBSD .............................................................................................................................................................. 29
5. Results and discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 30
5.1. Mechanical response to thermal cycling ........................................................................................................ 30
5.2. Comparing stress relaxations with thermal cycling (SRTC), sequential tensile tests (STT) and constant-load
(CL) creep tests..................................................................................................................................................... 31
5.3. Creep of SiMo51 at 700 °C, focusing on “Two-stage” tertiary creep............................................................ 34
5.4. Creep behaviour and damage of HK30 at 750 °C.......................................................................................... 37
5.5. Creep behaviour and damage of D5S at 750 °C ............................................................................................ 39
6. Summary........................................................................................................................................................... 43
7. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................................... 44
8. Sustainability statement .................................................................................................................................... 44
9. Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................... 45
10. References ...................................................................................................................................................... 46
4
1. Introduction
Exhaust manifolds (see Fig. 1) are located in the beginning of the exhaust system of truck
engines. They collect the hot exhaust gas, flowing from the six or eight cylinders, and pass it
further along the exhaust system. Due to starts and stops of the engine, they become
subjected to thermal cycling during service. Since they are more or less locked to other
components, not allowed to expand or contract freely, stresses arise. To prevent failure, they
are usually designed in a way to reduce both stresses and strains in critical sections. In reality,
the highest stresses and strains usually arise at sharp transitions, i.e. sudden variations in
thickness (and thermal expansion). To avoid this, a “streamlined” design is generally desired.
The manifolds are cast in sand molds and regular materials are ductile cast irons and cast
stainless steels. The ferritic ductile cast irons are mainly used for diesel engines and the
austenitic cast steels for more demanding applications, e.g. the gasoline engine (otto-engine).
D5S may work for both types. The ferritic ductile cast irons are not traditional high
temperature materials and have to be spiced and processed in a special way to obtain the
required properties. For example, in the case of SiMo51, Si and Mo have been added to give
additional oxidation resistance and strength. In addition, the casting process is often
simulated beforehand, testing various geometries and configurations to get the desired
microstructure and properties.
Firstly, the materials are subjected to mechanical and thermal loads. The service condition
described above, involving thermal cycling of locked parts, is usually called thermo-
mechanical fatigue. It involves both thermal and mechanical loading – in cycles. Depending
on the location, the relationship between stress, strain and temperature differs. It is called
TMF-OP when the loading and temperature are Out of Phase and TMF-IP when they are In
Phase. For example, the inner surface of a manifold is compressed (-) when heated (+) since
thermal expansion is restricted by the cold area of the outer wall. Thus, there is a phase shift
of 180° between stress and temperature which is a clear case of TMF-OP. Due to the
frequency and lifetime of the thermal cycles in manifolds, this loading is usually associated
with LCF (low-cycle fatigue). HCF (high-cycle fatigue) is also present and originates from
vibrations from the road and other components. TMF-testing of ductile cast iron, and
sometimes with the effect of adding HCF signals, have been thoroughly described in several
studies ( [1], [2], [3], [4]).
Secondly, the manifolds are oxidized during service, both by hot exhaust gases on the inside
and by air on the outside. Most obviously, oxidation decreases the metallic area and may
therefore increase the stress. This is, however, not so trivial as the oxides are known to have
different load-carrying abilities. Another aspect is that of crack growth: it is well known that
an oxide may initiate for instance fatigue cracks but less well known that it may also have a
blunting effect on crack tips which may reduce stress concentrations. However, in spite of
these “dual” effects, oxidation is generally considered to do bad. In the context of exhaust
manifold materials, the effect of oxidation on fatigue has been studied in depth by Ekström
[5], and Xiang et al. ( [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]), among others.
Thirdly, and central for this thesis, is the creep deformation associated with the thermal
cycling. Creep is both a repair and damage process as it unloads the material but also leads to
5
strain (geometry change) and creep damage. The unloading is due to the transformation of
elastic strains into plastic strains, leading to a stress relaxation. Traditionally, creep damage is
associated with various sorts of cavitation at grain boundaries and their linkage into cracks.
As will be demonstrated, the situation is slightly different for the cast irons due to the
occurrence of big graphite nodules in the matrix. Besides the work of the present study, creep
of ductile cast irons has for instance been studied by Hug et al. [11].
Alloy C Si Mn Ni Mg Cr P Cu Mo Al
SiMo51 3.0-3.5 4.2-4.8 <= 0.4 <= 0.1 0.02-0.08 <= 0.1 <= 0.05 <= 0.1 0.8-1.2 -
SiMo1000 3.0-3.9 2.0-3.2 <= 0.4 <= 1.0 - - - - 0.5-1.0 2.5-3.9
D5S <= 2.0 4.9-6.0 0.5-1.5 35.0-36.0 - 1.5-2.5 <= 0.08 <= 0.50 - -
HK30 0.25-0.35 0.5-2.0 - 19.0-22.0 - 23.0-27.0 <= 0.04 - <= 0.50 -
6
1.1.1. SiMo51
SiMo51 is probably the most common material for manifolds in diesel engines. It mainly
comprises a ferritic matrix, spherical graphite nodules and carbides. A micrograph of SiMo51
is shown in Fig 2, with one of the carbide segments of Fig 2a being highlighted in Fig 2b. All
parts of the segment are rich in Mo and some parts are additionally rich also in Si or Ti.
Besides these rather large structures, there are also small particles inside the grains, seen as
small black dots in Fig 2b. In creep theory, the larger grain boundary carbides are often
considered detrimental while small particles of appropriate structure and composition are
considered beneficial. The composition and crystal structure(s) of the carbides were not
completely verified but, searching elsewhere, Ekström et al. [13] list Mo- and Si-rich M6C
carbides.
The designation SiMo51 reflects the proportion of 5:1 between Si and Mo contents, see Table
1. Si provides increased “fluidity” of the melt during casting, solid solution strengthening and
oxidation resistance while Mo gives solid solution strengthening and carbide formation.
Oxidation resistance is derived from the formation of a thin, dense SiO2 barrier layer at
elevated temperatures [5], [14].
Fig 2. a) FSD (forward scattered diodes) image of the microstructure of SiMo51 and b)
EBSD band contrast image of the segment enclosed in a). (From appendix 3).
1.1.2. SiMo1000
SiMo1000 is a ferritic ductile cast iron which is similar to SiMo51 and is also used mainly for
diesel engines. It also contains Mo-rich carbides at the grain boundaries and smaller
precipitations inside the grains, see Fig 3. Differences are that it contains both spherical and
vermicular graphite and has a relatively high aluminium content of about 3 wt% (see Table 1)
which adds solid solution strengthening and changes the oxide barrier composition from SiO2
to Al2O3, see appendix 1. SiMo1000 is marketed as an improved version of earlier SiMo-
grades with better oxidation resistance, increased high-temperature strength and also a higher
ferrite-to-austenite transformation temperature [15]. It is also marketed as a cheaper
alternative to the austenitic D5S. The manufacturer and inventor, Georg Fischer Ltd,
recommends usage for applications such as turbocharger housings and exhaust manifolds
[15].
7
Fig 3. Microstructure of SiMo1000.
1.1.3. D5S
Both regarding price and properties, the austenitic cast iron D5S is somewhere in between the
cheap, weak ferritic ductile cast irons (e.g. SiMo51, SiMo1000) and the expensive, strong,
oxidation-resistant, cast steels (e.g. HK30). The higher price is mainly due to the high Ni
content (≈34 wt%) which promotes formation of an austenitic matrix. D5S belongs to the Ni-
resist family which includes both flake and spheroidal (referring to graphite shape) cast iron.
The etched microstructure, taken from appendix 5, is shown in Fig 4. Casting shrinkage
porosities can be seen in a), graphite and mixed structures in b), and a close-up of a mixed
structure in c). The latter are “mixed” as they contain several phases, likely both
intermetallics and carbides. Unfortunately, they could not be fully identified using
quantitative EDX or EBSD, but EDX mapping showed that carbon rich areas are also rich in
Cr and that the intermetallics are rich in Si, Ni and, in some areas, also in Mn.
8
Fig 4. a) Microstructure of D5S (shrinkage porosities are enclosed in red), b) higher
magnification, and c) a “mixed structure”. Electrochemically etched by applying 1.5V for
about 10s in 5 % HCl in ethanol. (From appendix 5).
1.1.4. HK30
As mentioned, HK30 can also be used for more demanding applications, e.g. gasoline
engines. A high Cr-content provides solid solution strengthening and precipitation
strengthening by carbide formation, and oxidation resistance through the formation of a thin
Cr-oxide film. A high Ni content promotes an austenitic matrix and also provides solid
solution strengthening. Compared with more common steels, such as austenitic 304 or 316
steels, the carbon content of HK30 is much higher (0.25-0.35 wt%). According to Piekarski et
al. [16], this is beneficial as all Cr is consumed in early formation of carbides and therefore
not available to form Cr-rich sigma phase. Sigma phase precipitation is generally considered
as detrimental for both mechanical and corrosive properties, but the true effect is complicated
and very much case-dependent (see literature review of appendix 4).
In the as-cast and subsequently heat-treated state, HK30 comprises an austenitic matrix and
M23C6 carbides, see Fig. 5 (from appendix 4). The carbides occur both as relatively thick
particles at the grain boundaries and as small dispersions inside the grains. The orientation
map of creep tested material in Fig 6 shows that one of the grains (i.e. dendrites) is at least 11
mm across. Since the creep specimens have a diameter of 10 mm, creep test results will
inevitably reflect properties close to those of a single crystal. There is very limited creep data
on HK30 available but there is more on HK40 (25Cr-20Ni-0.4C) which has a higher carbon
content of 0.4 wt%. For instance, HK40 has been studied with regard to creep by Whittaker et
al. [17] and Konosu et al. [18].
9
Fig. 5. a) Microstructure of HK30. (1) points towards an area of shrinkage porosities. b)
segregation boundaries. (2) points towards M23C6 carbides and (3) towards a TiN-particle.
Images from appendix 4.
Fig 6. Orientation map of creep tested HK30 material. (59 MPa, 750 °C). Images from
appendix 4.
2. Objectives
The primary objective of the present thesis is to investigate creep behaviour of the included
cast materials, both in terms of creep parameters/curve characteristics and creep damage.
Since the ductile cast irons, SiMo51 and SiMo1000, have big graphite nodules and oxidize
rather heavily, the creep response is expected to be different from that of pure metals as well
as more traditional high-temperature materials, e.g. Ni-base superalloys, and highly alloyed
steels. HK30 is similar to such “super grades” in several respects but the casting defects and
the coarse-grained structure make it unpredictable. The austenitic ductile cast iron D5S is
interesting as it lies somewhere in between the SiMo-materials and HK30. It includes large
graphite nodules but also comprises a highly alloyed austenitic matrix.
The investigated grades are used in various types of exhaust truck engines all over the world
and are constantly exposed to creep – but have barely been creep tested. There may be
several reasons for this:
10
i) Service temperatures have steadily increased with engine development, implying a
gradually increasing contribution from creep deformation. Thus, creep may not have been
that critical in the past.
ii) Compared with regular tensile tests, constant-load creep tests are more complicated, much
more expensive, and generally more time-consuming (obviously depending on load and
temperature). Additionally, since they are not controlled by deformation rate, it is more
difficult to estimate times to rupture in constant-load creep tests and thus to select suitable
loads.
iii) Large steel companies have financed creep testing of processed steel. The foundries are
often operated by relatively small companies with less resources to finance such research.
iv) Cyclic creep, which is the case of manifolds, has perhaps been considered too complicated
to account for.
As a second objective of the thesis, connecting with ii) and iv), attempts have been made to
compare faster methods, more specifically cyclic stress relaxations and monotonic, sequential
tensile testing, with the monotonic constant-load creep test method.
3. Theory
3.1 The origin of creep
Creep refers to slow, time-dependent plastic deformation at high temperature, usually starting
at around half of the melting temperature. As stated by Kassner [19], creep is enabled due to
a decrease in yield stress, derived both from high temperature and low deformation rate.
The temperature dependence arises since atomic motion is assisted by vibrations and because
the atoms are able to climb and diffuse around obstacles, Manson and Halford [20]. Another
effect is that the atomic bonds are longer and weaker at higher temperatures.
The strain-rate dependence can be explained by the smaller force required to move atoms
slowly [21], explaining why creep is considered a “below the yield stress” phenomenon. As
exemplified by Manson and Halford [20], the yield stress obtained in a slow tensile test of,
for instance, 10-7 s-1, is often much lower compared to the “conventional” yield stress which
is obtained in a regular tensile test (≈10-4 s-1).
11
In the secondary creep regime (3), the deformation hardening in (2) is balanced by
dislocation annihilation, i.e. recovery, resulting in a constant strain rate. For this regime to
develop, it is also necessary that the microstructure is stable. The secondary creep regime is,
however, an ideal case. In real life creep testing, the strain rate is seldom, or in very rare
cases, completely constant as some type of “damage” sets in and give at least a slight increase
in strain rate [22].
Finally, (4) marks the tertiary regime in which accumulated creep damage, crack growth and
a reduced load-carrying area accelerate deformation to the point of creep rupture, often
indicated by an ‘x’.
A lower stress (𝜎1 ) usually leads to a longer secondary creep (in time), a longer time to
rupture and a low strain to rupture [19]. The time and strain to rupture are naturally related:
longer times usually mean more evolved creep cavitation and a more brittle fracture, with
only small elongation upon rupture. Correspondingly, relatively high stresses (𝜎3 ) mean
negligible or shorter secondary creep, less evolved creep cavitation and a more ductile
fracture. Regular characteristics are then: large strain-induced voids, shear cracks, necking
and high strain to rupture [23].
In order to better understand the sequence of events during a creep test, creep strain rates are
usually plotted, either as a function of time or of strain, see illustration in Fig 8. The creep
strain-rate curves observed in the present study can be explained by general dislocation
and/or crack theories. The trends are again illustrated by three curves, one for each stress, see
Fig 8. For each curve, the red marker illustrates the lowest value of strain rate. If the strain
rate stays on this level, it is called the “steady-state” creep rate. If it instead shows an
inflection point, i.e. a direct transition, the rate is simply referred to as the “minimum creep
rate”. A direct transition is made possible by, for instance, cavitation, early crack growth,
oxidation, or in any other way an unstable microstructure. Since complete steady state is
more of a theoretical or “ideal” state, the minimum creep rate is usually used when presenting
results, for instance in a Norton plot which includes the minimum creep rate and applied
stress [22].
The trends illustrated in Fig 8 are, however, valid both in the case of a steady state and in the
case of a direct transition. Real plots of strain rate usually have log-10 scale (semi-log or log-
log). Regarding vocabulary, “hardening” and “softening” are sometimes used to point
towards segments of decreasing and increasing creep rates, respectively.
In the ε̇ -t-curve (Fig 8a), the steady state/minimum creep rate is reached earlier for higher
stresses. This is quite natural as a high stress generates many dislocations which quickly start
annihilating – a requirement for steady state. Additionally, it is natural to have early crack
growth, leading to a direct transition. In the case of a lower stress, there is instead a slow
deformation hardening, and it takes a long time to build the dislocation density needed for
wide-spread annihilation. It also takes longer time for cracking (causing a direct transition) to
take place since the creep damage accumulates more slowly.
In the ε̇ -ε-curve (Fig 8b), the situation is reversed: the steady state/minimum creep rates are
generally reached at lower strains for lower stresses. A high strain is simply not needed to
reach either steady state or cause early cracking – if things are allowed to develop slowly.
“Things” include a high dislocation density, leading to a steady state, or cracks, leading to a
12
direct transition. The general trend that a higher strain is needed to reach steady state if the
stress is high is also emphasized by Kassner, see Fig. 5 in [19] (originally published in [24]).
Fig 8. Typical scenario for three stress levels with: Creep strain rate as a function of a) time
and b) strain. (x = rupture).
13
Norton plots. The slope (n) is basically a measure of how dislocations are created and
annihilated in the material. The minimum creep rate is selected as that is the point where
dislocations are created and annihilated with the most even rate [22]. For pure metals and
many alloys, the slope (n) is then usually around 5. Because of these circumstances,
expressions like “five-power-law creep” or simply “power-law creep” are often used. The
limit is not very distinct and n-values of about 4-7 fall within five power-law creep [19]. If
the n-value is the same over the tested stress range, it indicates that the creep mechanism is
constant. A change in n (in any direction) is usually referred to as “power-law breakdown”
and indicates that a new creep mechanism becomes predominant.
The microstructural events taking place during creep, referring to the “dislocation” length
scale, are well-documented within the range of “five-power-law creep”. When plastic
deformation commences, the dislocation density increases and subgrains form. They arise as
a low energy geometry of the introduced dislocations and typically give rise to
misorientations of around 1°. Inside these subgrains, so-called Frank networks form. These in
turn consist of single dislocations, arranged in “criss-cross” substructures [19].
The subgrain boundaries and their movement are often linked to the creep strength of a metal.
It is preferred to have a lot of small dispersions inside the grains which “pin” the subgrains,
thereby lowering creep rates [26].
14
that no matrix or twin-boundary dislocations occurred in the case of 3 MPa whereas
significant amounts could be found in specimens tested above 5 MPa.
15
3.5 Cyclic creep
Few studies have involved how creep behaviour or creep rates are affected by a reversal of
the load. One reason for this may be that most traditional creep test rigs cannot do the
reversal from tensile to compressive loading as they use dead weights to load the specimen.
In that case, other machines, likely designed for fatigue experiments, are needed. Another
may be that compressive creep is not considered an issue since any cracks remain closed.
However, for the application of manifolds, creep rates in compression are also of interest to
get the net strain after many cycles.
On this topic, Swindeman [29] tested Inconel at 816 °C, comparing monotonic creep tests in
tension to cyclic creep tests, using the same (absolute) load values. In the cyclic tests, the
load was reversed when the strain reached a desired level, meaning that the test was load-
controlled but strain-triggered. Quite remarkably, the obtained times to rupture in monotonic
tensile loading were up to 4 times shorter at higher stresses and 2 times shorter at lower
stresses compared with the cyclic creep test. From this, Swindeman concluded that the time
under tensile loading is critical. He also pointed out the quite obvious: the stress increases in
a monotonic tensile test due to a decrease in load-carrying area but essentially remains the
same in a cyclic test (if the net strain is controlled to zero). A bit surprising, the measured
strain rates were higher in the cyclic creep test (although primary creep accounted for most of
it). Manson and Halford [20] explain the matter further by assuming a creep mechanism of
grain boundary sliding along the 45°-direction (with respect to load). They suggest that strain
rates are higher in tension due to less “friction” between the atoms compared with shear in
compression (along the same boundary).
16
“onion-like” mechanism. In this case, the outer shell, obtained by solid state diffusion during
solidification, was peeled off from the inner core (which is formed directly from the melt).
At higher temperatures, above 400 °C, there was significant plastic flow of the ferritic matrix,
even more pronounced void formation around nodules and a higher strain to rupture. In
compression, below 400°C, damage was reportedly plastic flow of the ferritic matrix and
fractured nodules at high strains. Above 400 °C, plastic flow was reported, but neither cracks
nor voids could be observed.
The significance of graphite nodules for plastic properties has been discussed in several
studies. For example, Sjögren et al. [32] tested flake and compacted cast iron and suggest
micro-yielding in the vicinity of graphite particles. They similarly suggest that higher stresses
lead to void formation at the graphite-matrix interface.
Furthermore, Dong et al. [33] did in-situ observations as they tensile tested a ferritic ductile
cast iron directly inside the SEM. They could see the following stages of deformation: 1) slip-
lines in the elastic regime, 2) small decohesion at the graphite-matrix interface right after
exceeding the macroscopic yield stress, 3) large ellipsoidal voids around graphite nodules, 4)
facture by shear cracks, linking the voids together, 5). In their modelling of the tensile test
curves, which reportedly was successful, they assumed a porous material in which the
graphite nodules were simply replaced by voids. The assumption was supported by the
observation that voids develop at the matrix-graphite interface immediately upon yielding (2)
without any “resistance” from the nodules.
17
instance TMF-cycling, were the difference in thermal expansion and plastic properties
between oxide and metal sometimes leads to spallation, i.e. oxides “jumping” off the surface.
Regarding pure Fe-Si alloys, Liu et al. [34] oxidation tested three grades of 2.75, 4.97 and
6.96 wt% Si. As the 4.97 wt% Si grade (close to SiMo51 in Si content) was exposed at 700°C
for 24h, a thin, covering Si-oxide formed together with “oxide nodules”. The nodules
included Fe2O3, growing outwards from the base metal, and Fe3O4, growing inwards, mixed
iron and Si oxides and, innermost, a thick Si-rich internal oxidation layer, also containing
SiO2 particles.
In the even more specific case of SiMo cast iron, Ekström et al. [13] did oxidation tests of
SiMo51 at 700 and 800 °C, observing Fe-oxides growing around graphite nodules and
carbides followed by “island growth” (similar to “oxide nodules”). The more uniform scale,
obtained after “steady-state”, consisted of layers of Fe2O3 and Fe3O4, both growing outwards,
and layers of Fe3O4, spinel and SiO2, growing inwards.
Ebel et al. [14] also did oxidation tests of a SiMo ductile cast iron, at 700 and 800 °C.
Similarly, two outwards growing layers of Fe2O3 and Fe3O4, and two inwards growing layers
of Fe3O4 and Fe2SiO4 were observed. The outwards growing layers were reportedly filled
with porosities while the inward growing oxides contained trace marks of old spheroids.
18
The creep rates during hold times could be obtained by first calculating the true strain, this is
𝜎
plotted in Fig 10, and then removing the elastic strain contribution, ( ), to obtain the plastic
𝐸
strain.
After the true plastic strain had been obtained, the data was standardized in order to facilitate
curve fitting of the strain evolution during the hold times, a procedure which is described
more detailed in appendix 2.
The following function, combining a linear and exponential relationship, was used for curve
fitting of (standardized) strain evolution with time:
𝑦𝑆 = 𝑝1 + 𝑝2 ∙ 𝑥𝑆 + 𝑝3 ∙ 𝑒𝑥𝑝(𝑝4 ∙ 𝑥𝑆 )
The standardized experimental time, 𝑡𝑆 , and standardized experimental strain, 𝜀𝑆 , were used
to evaluate 𝑝1 to 𝑝4 by minimizing the error of:
(𝑥𝑆 , 𝑦𝑆 ) = (𝑡𝑆 , 𝜀𝑆 )
during a relaxation. The modelled strain vs. time was obtained by reverting the
standardization procedure:
𝑥 − 𝑥̅
𝑥𝑆 =
𝑠𝑡𝑑(𝑥)
𝑦 − 𝑦̅
𝑦𝑆 =
𝑠𝑡𝑑(𝑦)
where 𝑥̅ and 𝑦̅ represent the average values and std defines the standard deviation.
The corresponding strain rate during relaxation was calculated from:
𝑑𝜀 𝑑𝑦 𝑠𝑡𝑑(𝑦) 𝑑𝑦𝑆 𝑠𝑡𝑑(𝑦)
𝜀̇ = = = ∙ = {𝑝 + 𝑝3 𝑝4 ∙ 𝑒𝑥𝑝(𝑝4 ∙ 𝑥𝑆 )}
𝑑𝑡 𝑑𝑥 𝑠𝑡𝑑(𝑥) 𝑑𝑥𝑆 𝑠𝑡𝑑(𝑥) 2
The same function of 𝑦𝑆 was used to fit the stress relaxation data (during hold times) which,
as can be seen in Fig 10, follow a similar evolution with time. This curve fitting was
necessary for removing scattering in the stress evolution during relaxation, mainly arising
from temperature fluctuations which are directly converted to stress fluctuations in the locked
specimen.
19
Fig 10. Cycling of HK30 between 700 and 800 °C by
heating/cooling rates of 200 °C/min and hold times of 3 min. The
temperature is indicated on the
stress axis and has been vertically shifted by 600 °C.
20
Table 2. Order of sequences in STT.
Sequence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ℇ [-] 0.000- 0.020- 0.025- 0.030- 0.035- 0.040- 0.045- 0.050-
0.020 0.025 0.030 0.035 0.040 0.045 0.050 0.055
ℇ̇ [s-1] 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 3.3·10-6 3.3·10-5 3.3·10-4 3.3·10-3
4. Experiments
4.1. Specimen preparation
Specimens were manufactured from cast plates, see Fig 12a. In order to avoid casting defects,
the plates were cast in connection to large cylinders which were cut off and thrown away.
Only the mid-section was used for manufacturing of test specimens, as indicated by the
schematic test specimen added to the illustrated in a). Various foundries were involved:
HK30 material was cast by Smålands gjuteri AB, Eksjö, Sweden, SiMo51 material by
Castings P.L.C, West Midlands, England, SiMo1000 by Georg Fischer Eisenguss GmbH,
Herzogenburg, Austria and D5S by Josef Brechmann GmbH & Co, Germany.
Specimen geometries are shown in Fig 12: b) CL, c) STT and d) tensile test specimens (used
for both SRTC and regular tensile testing).
21
a) b)
c) d)
Fig 12. Geometries of a) Cast plates and specimens used for b) CL, c) STT and d) SRTC and
tensile tests.
22
a) b)
Fig 13. a) Test rig used for SRTC and b) air-proof chamber.
23
temperature, the more homogenous temperature leads to more homogenous deformation
along the measurement zone, and measurements are more precise.
Fig 14. Temperature recorded 5 mm above, at, and 5 mm below the middle of the gauge
length.
24
a) Tracking of speckle patterns using the laser extensometer. The green tracking boxes,
thermocouple (TC), induction coil and specimen are shown in a horizontal view. Arrows
indicate the axial direction of the specimen. The weld point of the TC is below the middle
winding of the induction coil marked Ind. coil (where the two TC wires meet).
Fig 15.
To validate the performance and compare results between the two extensometers, a test was
carried out using both of them simultaneously, see experimental setup in Fig 15b, above.
HK30 was SRTC-tested with a lower and an upper limit of 500 and 800 °C, respectively. In
Fig 16a, the strain-time evolutions of the two devices are shown with (a) temperature and (b)
stress also plotted in dashed lines using the second y-axis. For pedagogical reasons, the strain
is given in mm instead of the usual [-] or [%]. There are three segments of the routine:
heating to the lower (start) temperature (1), pre-cycling in zero load control (2) and load by
thermal cycling in a locked state (3).
As can be seen in steps (1) and (2), the two devices show exactly the same strain when the
load is zero. Then, as the specimen is locked and loading by thermal cycling starts (3), the
extensometers register strains of about -0.1 mm (contact extensometer) and -0.3 mm (laser
extensometer) at the end of the first compression. It can be commented that Lo=12 mm for
both devices, fixed for the contact extensometer and manually set for the laser extensometer.
Thus, the results show that there is an actual difference in measured strain, a difference which
grows with the number of cycles.
So, which device shows the correct strain? A way of estimating is to look at the thermal strain
during pre-cycling at zero load (2), which is basically a dilatometry test between the lower
and upper temperature limits. This shows the strain contribution originating purely from
thermal expansion. During thermal cycling in a locked state, this thermal strain, along with a
25
small elastic strain, is transformed into plastic strain. Thus, the measured strain is not
expected to be much higher than the thermal strain during pre-cycling. Since it is slightly
higher in the case of the contact extensometer, and several times higher in the case of the
laser extensometer, the laser extensometer appears to show unreasonably high strain.
One reason for this potentially large error is that the laser extensometer cannot keep track of
the speckle patterns during deformation. The speckle pattern depends on the scattering angle
of the diffracted laser light which depends on surface topology, for example including the
orientation of surface-exposed grains. With this in mind, the tracked speckle patterns in the
green boxes are probably changed because of strain itself (leading to a changed diffraction).
The strained grains give a change in speckle pattern making it move which is then
misinterpreted as a strain. (This idea was suggested by Joakim Lindblom, see
acknowledgements). However, since the two devices show the same character of the strain
curve, they can both be used to investigate tendencies in strain. For the present study, this
means that the strains presented in appendix 1 are most likely too high but, nevertheless,
show the correct behaviour.
It can be commented that a similar measurement was made for SiMo51 which showed the
same result.
26
a)
b)
Fig 16. Strains registered during thermal cycling (SRTC) of HK30 using the contact and laser
extensometers. Temperature (a) and stress (b) were also plotted using the second (right) y-
axes. (1) Heating to the lower (start) temperature. (2) Pre-cycling at zero load, (3) Load by
thermal cycling in a locked state.
27
a) b)
Fig 17. a) Zwick/Roell Kappa test rig used “Sequential tensile tests”. b) Ceramic
extensometers setup.
28
a) b)
Fig 18. Setup of constant-load creep tests. a) Schematics of the rig, b) Specimen,
extensometers and two thermocouples (a third is yet to be tied above these two).
4.7 EBSD
In all EBSD-measurements, specimens were polished using oxide particles (Buehler
Colloidal Silica polishing suspension). A LEO 1530 FEG-SEM, with the EBSD detector
“Symmetry”, was used. Various step lengths were used depending on the accuracy needed.
29
For post-processing of data, the software analysis platform Aztek was used together with the
“Tango” software, included in the “Channel 5” package. Local misorientations were
calculated in each pixel as the average of the misorientations to the eight surrounding pixels.
30
yield stress is exceeded followed by a stress relaxation (2-3), see a), and heavy compressive
straining, see b). In reality, deformation hardening was small and is exaggerated in (2-3). (3-
4) mark the high temperature hold which was introduced to allow further creep deformation
during constant temperature. For later investigations, the second paper, appendix 2, this was
the most important segment. During (4-5), the load is reversed by cooling of the specimen. At
(5), the yield stress is exceeded on the tensile side, giving rise to a strain increase in b). Then,
as the yield stress becomes higher at lower temperatures, another segment of elastic
deformation (6-7) is followed through. (7-8) is the low temperature hold which, if this lower
temperature is high enough, allows strain increase due to creep deformation, see b). In (8-9),
the load is again reversed by heating. Since the stress is insufficient to cause yielding, (8-9)
only gives small elastic straining, see b). Due to the curvature of the hypothetical yield curve,
plastic deformation occurs again but only temporarily at 9-10, leading to substantial increase
in strain. Elastic deformation (10-11) proceeds until the yield stress is reached, creating a new
compression. Since the cycles did not overlap, the specimen “climbed” towards positive (as
illustrated) or negative strains. Climb towards negative strains was more common and
resulted in “barrelling” which could be readily observed after many cycles.
Fig 19. Illustration of SRTC (1.5 thermal cycles) with stress a) and strain b).
Blue = elastic segments, Red = plastic segments.
31
rate evolutions during the high temperature holds (800 °C) of cycles 1-91 have been included
in the plot. For STT, data at 800 °C, including obtained strain rates and saturation stresses,
are included with the associated regression line. As can be seen, the data sets agree almost
perfectly. From this and similar plots including the other materials, it was concluded that
creep in tension, by tensile testing, and compression, by stress relaxations, are the same for
these materials. It can also be noticed that creep rates remain unchanged with the number of
cycles. This is valuable to know in various fatigue lifetime simulations which need input of
cyclic creep parameters, which in this particular case are the same as the monotonic ones. For
instance, the effect of adding creep models to fatigue lifetime simulations of exhaust
manifolds have been studied by Seifert et al. [39], [40].
The same tendencies, with small modifications, could be seen for the other three materials
SiMo51, SiMo1000 and D5S. See more details in appendix 2.
Comparing all three methods, applied to SiMo51 at the upper limit test temperature of 700
°C, things became more complicated. In the case of SRTC, an extra-long hold time of 8.3 h
was introduced to really enter the creep regime in compression. Just as for other comparisons,
only the high temperature (700 °C) hold time data was evaluated. As can be seen in Fig 21,
the SRTC and STT results agree almost perfectly at higher stresses, just as for HK30 in Fig
20. At lower stresses, where the results of the CLs can be found, the strain rate evolution of
the SRTC test abruptly goes down to practically zero, just as if there was a critical stress for
creep deformation. The CLs fall about one decade lower in strain rate compared with STT
and SRTC (found at higher stresses), but the data sets have about the same slope, indicating a
similar creep mechanism. The cause of the shift of one decade in strain rate could not be fully
verified. However, in appendix 2, oxidation is briefly discussed as a possible reason. The
thought behind this is that the growing oxides increase the specimen diameter during primary
creep and thus lower the stresses/minimum creep rates in relation to those of SRTC and STT
(where times for oxidation were much shorter). Quite naturally, the credibility of this theory
depends on the load-carrying ability of the oxide scale as a whole, which is not established.
To avoid confusion, it can be commented that in estimations of the effect of oxidation on
creep strain rates (appendix 3) the load-carrying ability was instead set to zero by assuming
that the inwards-growing oxide layer did not carry load. See paragraph 5.3, or most detailed,
appendix 3. Another reason could be that different casting batches were used for SiMo51 in
the CL tests (one batch) compared with STT/SRTC (another batch), which could give rise to
differences in microstructure (even if such could not be observed). The chemical
compositions of the batches were generally very similar, but one difference was that the batch
used for the CL test of SiMo51 contained 0.20 wt% Ni whereas that used for STT/SRTC
contained 0.03 wt% Ni which could give a difference in solution strengthening.
The critical stress for creep deformation, as mentioned above, was only observed in the
SRTC test. A possible explanation can be traced to the level of pre-deformation associated
with each test. To begin with, the SRTC stress relaxation included in Fig 21 was preceded by
deformation (compression) of 2.1 % during the heating ramp prior to the hold time. In
addition, 1.2 % strain accumulated during the actual hold time. With the STT tests, the
present settings (see Table 2) always result in a pre-deformation of 2 % strain (by tensile
stress). In the CL test of 14 MPa, on the other hand, pre-deformation was only 0.4 % at the
point of reaching the minimum creep rate. Thus, pre-deformations were much larger for the
two faster methods compared with the slow CL test. This could explain the creep stop, i.e.
32
why the strain rates of the SRTC test go down to zero at about 14 MPa whereas the CL test of
14 MPa still gives a measurable minimum creep rate of about 10-9 s-1, see Fig 21.
Regarding prolonged “steady state” or a direct transition to tertiary creep, the compressive
SRTC sequences probably only allow steady state since cracks generally do not grow in
compression. However, a comparison is meaningful in the case of STTs and CLs. The STT
tests, due to the large pre-deformation (2 %), probably exhibit a steady state rather quickly.
This is confirmed by the plateau of the first sequence (10-4 s-1) of the 700 °C STT test of
SiMo51, previously shown in Fig 11. Additionally, the following sequences in Fig 11 also
show plateaus (except the second), indicating steady state. The CLs, on the other hand,
quickly go into tertiary creep (although the curves level out before, see paragraph 5.3). An
explanation of this difference is the aspect of time: in a creep test, damage is allowed to grow
more slowly and cause a direct transition. In the tensile tests, dislocations are instead quickly
pumped into the material and a steady state is reached just as fast – but there is not enough
time for damage to grow.
Another viable cause for a quick transition is oxidation, see paragraph 5.3.
Fig 20. HK30, cycled between 300-800 °C. Results at 800 °C, including the stress-strain rate
evolution of the hold time (SRTC) and strain rates-saturation stresses (STT).
33
Fig 21. Norton plot of SiMo51 including STT, CL and SRTC (hold time of 8.3 hours in
compression) at 700 °C.
The comparison between CL and STT could also be briefly commented for the materials
HK30 and D5S, which were both tested at 750 °C in STT and CL.
For HK30, STT at 750 °C was not included in appendix 2, since the deformation hardening
observed in the STTs at 750 °C was too heavy and no “plateau”, i.e. saturation stress, was
reached in any of the sequences. Thus, no sound comparison could be made with the CL tests
at 750 °C in that case. A suggestion for future work could be to test HK30 by avoiding high
deformation rates (e.g. 10-4-10-3 s-1).
In the case of D5S, the CL data at 750 °C was not shifted to a lower level compared to the
STT data at 750 °C, but in that case the slopes of the two Norton plots (the n-values) differed
instead. In summary, there is no consistency in the difference in results between the STT and
CL for the materials. Hence, the discrepancies could simply be related to differences in
microstructure and chemical composition between the various casting batches which were
used for each test.
34
and the additional points (black squares) were in that case used to evaluate the true strain
rate-time dependence.
Fig. 22. True strain rate (creep rate) as a function of true strain. SiMo51, tested at 700 °C.
Numbers beside points indicate two hypothetical stress evolutions of the 12 MPa sample
taking area reduction into consideration with respect to volume conservation (Strain Comp)
and with respect to surface oxidation (Ox. Comp), respectively. (From appendix 3).
Fig. 23. The first part of the constant-load creep tests of SiMo51 with a linear time scale.
Referring to Fig. 22 again, primary creep was followed by a “first” tertiary creep stage which
is seen as a linear segment in the log-log plot of true strain rate as a function of strain. This is
in turn followed by a “second” tertiary stage, being more accelerated in nature. A question
being raised was how the tertiary stage could be subdivided into two stages, i.e. what caused
the first stage. Three possible reasons were considered: i) reduced load-carrying area due to
pure straining (volume conservation), ii) reduced load-carrying area due to oxidation and iii)
softening from creep damage. In calculations of the various contributions (Fig. 22), the 12
MPa specimen served as an example.
35
The contribution from pure straining, i), was obtained by calculating the true stresses at
certain true strains, using the technological stress of 12 MPa and the constant-volume
approach. The stress was then inserted into Norton’s creep law (obtained by regression
analyses of the minimum creep rates) to obtain a “strain-compensated” strain rate. See the
black line, labelled “Strain Comp”, in Fig. 22. As can be seen, the effect of pure straining on
stress and resulting creep strain rate is rudimental during the “first” tertiary stage. Therefore,
it cannot be held responsible for the measured increase in strain rate.
Secondly, the effect of oxidation, ii), was estimated by plotting the oxide thickness obtained
from one (separate) oxidation test and the four creep tests. For more details, see appendix 3.
In Fig. 22, each strain corresponds to a time which, from the oxidation curve, was translated
into an oxide thickness. Since about half of the oxide grew inwards and decreased the
metallic area, the total oxide thickness, plotted in the oxidation thickness curve, was divided
by 2 and removed from the original specimen radius. The remaining area was finally
translated into “oxidation-compensated” stresses which, by Norton’s law, in turn were
translated into strain rates, see “Ox. Comp” in Fig. 22. As a last check, the purely metallic
area of each fractured specimen was measured with the light optical microscope. These areas
were translated to stresses (since the load is constant) and strain rates (again through Norton’s
law) and are indicated by filled, coloured circles. As can be seen, the oxidation compensated
strain rate is not high enough to account for the measured rate. Neither is the strain rate
calculated from the purely metallic area. It is also interesting to note that in the “first” tertiary
stage, the last strain rate of “Ox. Comp” (marked 13.24) agrees perfectly with the strain rate
calculated from the purely (measured) metallic area (filled blue circle). This confirms that
practically all area reduction was from oxidation and that the original radius was correctly
reduced by only half of the total oxide thickness.
Rejecting the options listed above, the increasing strain rate in the “first” tertiary stage was
attributed to accumulating creep damage, iii). The existence of such creep damage was
confirmed through microscopical investigations. In Fig 24, the various types of creep damage
are indicated, this time with the 14 MPa specimen serving as an example. (1) is a typical form
of creep cavitation, located at grain boundary carbides. (2) is cavitation around the graphite
nodules. In quick tensile testing, such damage also occurred but in the shape of large ovals
around the nodules. In the creep tests, such ovals are clear signs of locally elevated
deformation rates. (3) is the linkage of ovals/cavities/nodules into larger cracks. When
connected to air, this type of “dimple” crack is oxidized, see (4). (5) indicates the outer oxide
scale.
Connecting this to the discussion on the “two-stage” tertiary creep, (1-2) are related to the
first stage and (3) to the second stage of tertiary creep.
36
Fig 24. Various types of damage in SiMo51, CL tested by 14 MPa at 700 °C (tr= 114 days).
37
documentation of the 53 MPa specimen was not included in the paper, appendix 4, it is added
here instead. As can be seen in Fig. 26, showing unetched material, creep cavitation grows as
isolated segments which, in other spots, see b), have connected into larger cracks.
Other effects during creep were surface re-crystallization and particle precipitation. Both are
featured in Fig. 27. In Fig. 27a, an orientation map of a cross-section including a grain-
boundary creep-crack along with the re-crystallized specimen surface (bottom) is shown. As
can be seen, the crack is located at a grain boundary of the original, un-recrystallized material
whereas only a hint of a crack can be observed in the recrystallized layer. This indicates an
effective grain boundary sliding mechanism in the recrystallized layer, preventing the crack
from entering this region. Furthermore, much smaller recrystallized grains can be found near
the crack which is indicative of a dynamic recrystallization process.
Regarding the creep testing artefact from recrystallization, it was considered to not
fundamentally influence creep as the layer was too thin. Altogether, it seems as though the
recrystallized layer was like a ductile skin of the material, but without adding any apparent
strength. The original material cracked along the original grain boundaries, seemingly with
no relation to the recrystallized layer. As a result, the crack may be difficult to see on the
specimen surface, although being very clear inside the material.
In the original, untested HK30 material, only M23C6 precipitations could be found. During
creep exposure, two new phases precipitated: sigma phase and, likely, G phase. The
distribution of the three phases is shown in Fig. 27b, a highlighted area of Fig. 27a. As can be
seen, the sigma phase was bulkier compared with the others and was preferentially located at
original, un-recrystallized grain boundaries and also recrystallized grain boundaries. The
cracks do not grow through the precipitations but around them, as evidenced by Fig. 27b.
Thus, the particle-matrix interface appears to be the weak link of HK30.
As previously shown, Fig 6, HK30 has a very big grain size of several mm (up to cm size).
From a creep perspective, this may be an advantage as the grain boundary area is relatively
small. However, only a very few, large grains allow less rotation as a response to
deformation, generally leading to increased brittleness.
Fig 25. HK30, creep tested at 750 °C. Creep strain rate as a function of time (semi-log axes).
38
Fig. 26. a), b) Creep cavitation/cracks in HK30 specimen tested at 53 MPa and 750 °C,
tr= 1,557 h.
Fig. 27. a) Orientation map featuring a grain boundary crack and the recrystallized surface
layer (bottom), b) phase precipitations in the recrystallized layer and along the crack. The
specimen surface is just below the bottom in the images.
39
Fig 28. D5S, creep tested at 750°C. Creep strain rate as a function of time (semi-log axes).
In order to see the damage originating purely from secondary creep, the 18.5 MPa specimen
was interrupted after 6494 h. For this specimen, and for the shorter lasting specimen of 20
MPa, the documented cavitation and damage is shown in Fig 29. As can be seen, small
cavities have emerged around graphite nodules in both materials. Since 20 MPa was tested to
rupture, it also contains clear traces of tertiary creep in the form of shear cracks (see Fig 29d).
40
Fig 29. Microstructure of creep specimens of D5S tested at 750 °C. a) Creep cavitation (18.5
MPa), b) same as a) in lower mag. c) creep cavitation (20 MPa), d) shear cracks (20 MPa).
The 20 MPa specimen was also investigated using EDX/EBSD and it was revealed that
significant amounts of Cr7C3 carbides along with larger particles, including Fe2Ni2Si and an
unidentified carbide, had precipitated during creep exposure. The effect on creep rate is hard
to account for as there are at least two opposing mechanisms: decreased solution
strengthening and increased precipitation hardening (depending on the particles). Cr7C3
carbides precipitated both in the shape of plates and small spheres while the other particles
were large and irregularly shaped. Images of the various precipitations and their
corresponding EDX maps can be found in appendix 5.
In local misorientation measurements, sub-grain boundaries of about 1°, i.e. very small
misorientations from deformation, were measured. The corresponding misorientation images
(maps) show the local imbalance in dislocation density and thus only indicate the degree of
plastic deformation. It could be emphasized that gliding dislocations produce plastic
deformation whereas locally stored dislocations, with an imbalance in the sum of Burgers
vector produce a local misorientation, which is being observed. At higher temperatures
recovery and annihilation often restores the lattice leaving no apparent trace of the strain
created by gliding dislocations while shaping more well-defined cell walls and sub-grains
with clearer orientation differences. Thus, the local misorientation technique is useful to show
tendencies in the dislocation microstructure being formed, rather than measuring local
deformations. Compared with a regular misorientation measurement, which gives the
orientation from one pixel to the next, the local misorientation in each pixel is the average of
41
the misorientations between this pixel and the surrounding pixels (3*3 matrix). This noise-
reducing moving average filter is sometimes critical for observing the very small
strains/misorientations due to creep.
Local misorientations were measured on untested and creep tested (20 MPa) materials, see
Fig 30. In Fig 30a, it can be seen that even the untested material contains low angle
misorientations/subgrain boundaries of about 1°. In Fig 30b, the effect of creep deformation
is seen as a significant increase in subgrain boundaries of around 1°.
In addition, the same areas are shown as “regular” orientation maps in Fig. 31. There, it can
be noted that both untested and creep tested materials contain additional subgrain boundaries
(>2°) but there is no apparent increase. Hence, creep adds a lot of 1° subgrain boundaries to
the material, in accordance with Kassner et al. [19].
Fig 30. Local misorientation (0-2°) in D5S, a) untested and b) creep tested (20 MPa)
materials.
Fig. 31. “Regular” orientation maps of the areas in Fig 30 with a) untested and b) creep tested
(20 MPa) materials. High angle grain boundaries (>15°) are shown as thick black lines while
low-angle boundaries (>2°) are shown as subtle gray lines. Red = {001}, Green = {101},
Blue = {111}. Reference: Y-axis (in the specimen plane).
42
6. Summary
Four cast materials, including three ductile cast irons and one cast steel, were tested mainly
with regard to slow and fast plasticity. The first two papers (see appendices 1 and 2) treat the
method development and data output analyses associated with the three methods SRTC, STT
and CL. The third, fourth and fifth papers are more focused on damage, mainly from creep
but, in the third paper, also from oxidation and tensile testing.
The first paper (appendix 1) mainly describes the mechanical response to thermal cycling and
the method of SRTC as an alternative to the more traditional TMF testing. In general, SRTC
is easier to conduct as it is not strain-controlled. The thermal cycling loops were described in
terms of elastic and plastic deformation segments. It was shown that they carry essential
information about mechanical properties, such as evolution in flow stress over the selected
temperature interval. Several test parameters, such as temperature interval, heating/cooling
rates and hold times were changed to see the various effects. The contributions in strain
during each part of the thermal cycle were compared.
In the second paper (appendix 2), the hold-time stress-relaxation-data, generated from
thermal cycling using SRTC, was compared with sequential tensile tests and constant-load
creep tests. The results were inserted into “Norton plots”, double logarithmic stress-strain rate
diagrams which are regularly used to compare creep data. Results obtained by the two fast
methods, SRTC and STT, in many cases showed perfect agreement. Since SRTC results were
often evaluated with regard to hold time compression at the upper temperature of thermal
cycling while STT includes tensile loading, the results showed that creep rates are
independent of load direction. “Cyclic” creep rates were more or less unchanged with the
number of cycles. At 700 °C, the CL data set ended up one order of magnitude lower (in
strain rate) compared with SRTC and STT but had the same slope which indicates one
common creep mechanism.
In the third paper (appendix 3), the damage from the CL tests of SiMo51 (appendix 2) was
investigated. Tensile tests and oxidation tests were also carried out for comparison. As
described above, primary creep was more or less directly followed by a “two-stage” tertiary
creep. Out of these two stages, the first accounted for the largest part of the creep life and was
therefore of biggest interest. After considering pure straining and oxidation, rejecting both, it
was attributed to cavitation around graphite nodules and at the grain boundaries. The second
tertiary stage was attributed to the usual characteristics of tertiary creep, namely coalescence
of smaller creep cracks into larger ones. Tensile test damage was associated with necking and
large oval voids around the graphite nodules.
In the fourth paper (appendix 4) the cast steel HK30 was investigated in constant-load creep
testing at 750 °C. During creep, sigma phase and presumed G-phase precipitated. The phase
identities were verified using EBSD and Thermo-Calc. As a specimen preparation artefact,
the surface of the specimens recrystallized during creep testing. However, since the
recrystallized zone was so thin and apparently did not crack, it is not considered to have had
any real effect. Instead, cracks propagated in grain boundaries, predominantly following grain
boundary particle interfaces of the original, “un-recrystallized” material. Ultimately, the large
grains, sometimes exceeding the specimen diameter, were considered the big weakness of
HK30.
43
In the fifth paper (appendix 5), D5S was CL tested, also at 750°C due to similar service
conditions as HK30. The creep damage reminded of the one observed for SiMo51: “delicate”
cavitation around graphite nodules at low stresses and long times, and large oval voids
around nodules at high stresses and short times. For both SiMo51 and D5S, the delicate
cavities were considered a time-dependent creep-phenomenon, likely following one of the
many theories on creep cavitation. The large ovals were attributed to strain-dependent
dislocation glide. Cr7C3 particles precipitated together with larger particles, including
Fe2Ni2Si and an unidentified carbide. The effect from the observed precipitation is
complicated to predict as there is both decreased solution strengthening and increased
precipitation hardening. Creep deformation created a lot of additional subgrain boundaries of
about 1° in the material.
7. Conclusions
In the present study, two ferritic ductile cast irons (SiMo51, SiMo1000), one austenitic cast
iron (D5S) and one austenitic cast steel (HK30), were included. The materials were mainly
tested using three methods: stress relaxations with thermal cycling (SRTC), sequential tensile
testing (STT) and the constant-load creep test (CL). Data sets generated by STT and SRTC
generally agreed very well, but there were discrepancies compared with the CL tests.
When subjected to constant-load creep testing at 700 °C, the ferritic ductile cast iron SiMo51
showed more or less direct transitions between primary and tertiary creep. Creep cavities
could be found around the graphite nodules and at the grain boundaries. Highly deformed
areas showed large elliptical pores around the graphite nodules, a damage which was also
found in the neck of tensile tested specimens.
The austenitic cast steel HK30 and the austenitic ductile cast iron D5S were constant-load
creep tested at 750 °C. Both materials showed direct transition between primary and tertiary
creep at higher stresses and more or less prolonged secondary creep at lower stresses. HK30
showed typical grain boundary creep-cavitation after long-term creep exposure. Sigma phase
and G phase precipitated during creep. The cracks were intergranular and followed particle-
matrix interfaces.
D5S showed large elliptical pores around graphite nodules when tested at higher stresses and
delicate creep cavities around the nodules at lower stresses (similar to SiMo51). Various
particles precipitated during creep exposure. Subgrain boundaries of 1° formed due to creep
deformation. Final rupture occurred by shear cracks which propagated nodule-to-nodule.
8. Sustainability statement
The strive towards lower emissions in truck diesel- and gasoline engines has led to better
engines in term of efficiency but also to higher temperatures of the exhaust gases. This
development inevitably puts higher demands on the cast materials which are used for the
application. Since creep deformation is one of the main degradation processes of the manifold
materials, it is also essential to test the materials regarding their resistance against such
exposure.
Referring to the 17 sustainable development goals set by the European Commission, this
relates to: 7) affordable and clean energy, 9) industry, innovation and infrastructure, 11)
44
sustainable cities and communities, 12) responsible consumption and production and 13)
climate action.
9. Acknowledgements
Regarding financing, the first part of the work (up to the licentiate degree) was completely
financed by Scania CV AB. I am very grateful for this contribution.
The second part of the work (post-licentiate) was financed by a VINNOVA project, no. 2018-
04019, “Inverkan av korrosion och krypning på utmattning av värmebeständiga material till
avgaskomponenter” within the research program “Fordonsstrategisk Forskning och
Innovation, FFI”, at VINNOVA, Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems. I
am also very grateful for this governmental support and for the time the supervisors spent on
writing the application.
Stefan Jonsson (main supervisor), is acknowledged for his contributions to appendices 1-5,
for being a big inspiration as a researcher and supervisor, for teaching me a lot of new skills,
for always being very careful and thorough in his review of my work, and for highly
stimulating discussions.
Baohua Zhu (co-supervisor), is acknowledged for her contributions to appendices 1-5, for
being highly supportive as a project leader, for teaching me about various sample preparation
techniques, and for writing funding applications.
Joakim Lindblom, is acknowledged for teaching me a lot about materials science and testing
methodology in general, for suggesting me to start spot welding the thermocouples, and for
his theories regarding the speckle pattern tracking (4.2.2). Also, for taking me out sailing with
the Wayfarer.
Henrik Östling, Taina Vuoristo and Mats Larsson are acknowledged for carrying out the
creep tests. Henrik is especially acknowledged for providing a lot of insightful questions as
opponent during my licentiate defense, for teaching me a lot about creep, and for being very
helpful.
Joacim Hagström, is acknowledged for teaching me about EBSD, very beautiful imaging and
for a very good collaboration.
Jan Linder, is generally aknowledged for fruitful discussions and for providing valuable
suggestions.
Ralf Rablbauer, is acknowledged for arranging the STT tests, for arranging our visits to
Volkswagen and for his contribution to appendix 2.
Marc Imiela is acknowledged for carrying out the STT tests at Volkswagen and for teaching
me how to do the tests for a second round of tests.
Madeleine Ekström is acknowledged for fruitful discussions, for valuable previous
contributions to the research field, and for introducing me to the topic.
Anders Tjernberg is aknowledged for a good collaboration (even though we could not
publish) and for teaching me about a lot about creep and stress relaxations.
45
Peter Skoglund is acknowledged for lending me his test rig and for teaching me about testing
methodology and TMF.
Jessica Elfsberg is acknowledged for helping with questions related to casting and nodule
measurements.
Nulifer Ipek is acknowledged for being inspirational and highly supportive.
Lasse Miettunen is acknowledged for arranging his course in test programming and for being
highly forthcoming in adjustments of the test rig used for SRTC.
Shengmei Xiang is acknowledged for co-operation in lab development.
Peter Szakalos is acknowledged for his valuable comments regarding the oxidation of
SiMo51.
Rolf Sandström is acknowledged for teaching me about creep.
The group at Scania (YTMB) is acknowledged for being supportive, friendly and helpful.
The Workshop of Scania is acknowledged for doing parts of the sample preparation, and for
being very helpful in this matter.
My colleagues at KTH, including other PhD students, are acknowledged for good
comradeship.
My mother Heléne, my father Mikael and my brother Eric are acknowledged for unlimited
support and help with everything outside of the PhD life.
Temporary colleagues at Adaptus Rehab AB, including Petra, Kristin, Fanny, Andrea and
Andreas, are acknowledged for being a good company during my last time as a PhD student.
Close friends, including Petter, Carl and Wictor, are acknowledged for good times and good
support.
10. References
[1] V. Norman, Fatigue of Heavy-Vehicle Engine Materials, Doctoral thesis, Linköping:
Linköping University, 2018.
[2] F. Bruch, Thermo-mechanical fatigue of ductile iron, Masters thesis, Kassel: Institut fur
Werkstofftechnik, Metallische Werkstoffe, 2015.
[3] N. Collin, Thermo-mechanical fatigue of cast iron for engine application, Masters
thesis, Stockholm: KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), 2014.
[5] M. Ekström, Oxidation and corrosion fatigue aspects of cast exhaust manifolds,
Doctoral thesis, Stockholm: KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), 2015.
46
[6] S. Xiang, S. Jonsson, B. Zhu and J. Odqvist, "Corrosion fatigue of austenitic cast iron
Ni-resist D5S and austenitic cast steel HK30 in argon and synthetic diesel exhaust at
800°C," International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 132, pp. 1-11, 2020.
[11] E. Hug, C. Keller, J. Favergon and K. Dawi, "Application of the Monkman-Grant law
to the creep fracture of nodular cast irons with various matrix composites and
structures," Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 518, pp. 65-75, 2009.
[14] A. Ebel, S. Yapi Brou, B. Malard, J. Lacaze, D. Monceau and L. Vaissiere, "High-
Temperature Oxidation of a High Silicon SiMo Spheroidal Cast Iron in Air with In Situ
Change in H20-content," Materials Science Forum, vol. 925, pp. 353-360, 2017.
[15] Georg Fischer, "SiMo1000 Materials Data Sheet," Georg Fischer, 2014.
[16] B. Piekarski and J. Kubicki, "Creep-resistant austenitic cast steel," Archives of Foundry
Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 115-120, 2008.
47
[20] S. Manson and G. Halford, Fatigue and Durability of Metals at High Temperatures,
ASM International, 2009.
[23] M. Ashby, C. Gandhi and D. Taplin, "Fracture-mechanism maps and their construction
for F.C.C metals and alloys," Acta Metallurgica, vol. 27, pp. 699-729, 1979.
[24] T. Tozera, O. Sherby and J. Dorn, Trans. ASM , vol. 49, p. 173, 1957.
[25] F. Norton, The Creep of Steels at high Temperatures, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1929.
[26] R. Sandström, "Creep Strength of austenitic stainless steels for boiler applications,"
Coal Power Plant Materials and Life Assessment, pp. 127-145, 2014.
[27] H. Frost and M. Ashby, "Deformation-mechanism maps for pure iron, two austenitic
stainless steels, and a low-alloy ferritic steel," Fundamental Aspects of Structural Alloy
Design, 1977.
[28] J.-O. Nilsson, P. Howell and G.L. Dunlop, "Interfacial microstructure and low stress,
high temperature creep of an austenitic stainless steel.," Acta Metallurgica, vol. 27, pp.
179-186, 1979.
[31] I. Hervas, A. Thuault and E. Hug, "Damage Analysis of a Ferritic SiMo Ductile Cast
Iron Submitted to Tension and Compression Loadings in Temperature," Metals, vol. 5,
pp. 2351-2369, 2015.
[33] M. Dong, C. Prioul and D. Franscois, "Damage Effect on the Fracture Toughness of
Nodular Cast Iron: Part 1. Damage Characterization and Plastic Flow Stress Modeling,"
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 28, pp. 1997-2245, 1996.
[34] L. L. Liu, Q. Guo and Y. Niu, "Transition Between Different Oxidation Modes of
Binary Fe-Si Alloys at 600-800C in Pure O2," Oxidation of Metals, vol. 79, pp. 201-
224, 2013.
48
[35] M. Appelt, Eisen-Aluminium-Legierung fu ̈r thermomechanisch belastete
Komponenten im Abgasstrang (Doctoral thesis), Karlsruher institut fur technologie,
2013.
[37] A. Verma, M. Sundararaman, J. Singh and S. Nalawade, "A new method for
determining the Curie temperature using a dilatometer," Measurement Science and
Technology, vol. 10, pp. 105-106, 2010.
[38] Swedish Institute of Standards, "Metallic materials - Uniaxial creep testing in tension -
Method of test (ISO 204:2018)," Swedish Institute of Standards, 2018.
[39] T. Seifert, R. Hazime and S. Dropps, "TMF Life Prediction of High Temperature
Components Made of Cast Iron HiSiMo: Part II: Multiaxial Implementation and
Component Assessment," SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing,
vol. 7, pp. 421-431, 2014.
[40] T. Seifert, R. Hazime and S. Dropps, "TMF life prediction of high temperature
components made of cast iron HiSiMo: Part I: uniaxial tests and fatigue life model.,"
SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, vol. 7, pp. 439-445, 2014.
49