Phylogeny 3
Phylogeny 3
Phylogeny 3
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS
OF ANGIOSPERMIC PLANTS
Engler's Botanical Ranks-
Hutchinson System
A system of plant taxonomy by John Hutchinson, the Hutchinson system, was
published as The families of flowering plants, arranged according to a new system
based on their probable phylogeny (two volumes) in three editions; 1st edition 1926–
1934; 2nd edition 1959; 3rd edition, 1973. This classification is according to the 1st
Edition Volume 1: Dicotyledonae 1926 and Volume 2:Monocotyledonae 1934.
His working pattern-
Hutchinson divided the Phylum Angiospermae into two Subphyla Dicotyledones and
Monocotyledones. The Dicotyledones are further divided into two divisions-Lignosae
(arboreal) and Herbaceae (herbaceous).
The Lignosae includes, fundamentally, the woody representatives derived from
Magnoliales and Herbaceae includes most of the predominantly herbaceous families
derived from Ranales. The subphylum Monocotyledones are divided into three
divisions — Calyciferae, Corolliferae and Glumiflorae.
APG (ANGIOSPERM
PHYLOGENY GROUP )SYSTEM
The APG system (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group system) of plant classification is
the first version of a modern, mostly molecular-based, system of plant taxonomy.
Published in 1998 by the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, it was replaced by the
improved APG II in 2003, APG III system in 2009 and APG IV system in 2016.
The original APG system is unusual in being based, not on total evidence, but on
the cladistic analysis of the DNA sequences of three genes, two chloroplast genes and
one gene coding for ribosomes. Although based on molecular evidence only, its
constituent groups prove to be supported by other evidence as
well,example pollen morphology supports the split between the eudicots and the rest
of the former dicotyledons.
The system is rather controversial in its decisions at the family level, splitting a
number of long-established families and submerging some other families. It also is
unusual in not using botanical names above the level of order, that is, an order is the
highest rank that will have a formal botanical name in this system. Higher groups are
defined only as clades, with names such as monocots, eudicots, rosids, asterids.
APG I (1998)
The initial 1998 paper by the APG made angiosperms the first large group of
organisms to be systematically re-classified primarily on the basis of genetic
characteristics. The paper explained the authors' view that there is a need for a
classification system for angiosperms at the level of families, orders and above, but
that existing classifications were "outdated". The main reason why existing systems
were rejected was because they were not phylogenetic.
Salient Features - :
1.Formal, scientific names are not used above the level of order, named clades being
used instead. Thus eudicots and monocots are not given a formal rank on the grounds
that "it is not yet clear at which level they should be recognized".
2.A substantial number of taxa whose classification had traditionally been uncertain
are given places, although there still remain 25 families of "uncertain position".
3.Alternative classifications are provided for some groups, in which a number of
families can either be regarded as separate or can be merged into a single larger
family.
APG II (2003)
Some of the main changes in APG II were:
1. New orders are proposed, particularly to accommodate the 'basal clades' left as
families in the first system.
2. Many of the previously unplaced families are now located within the system.
3. Several major families are re-structured
APG III (2009)
The third paper from the APG updates the system described in the 2003 paper. The
broad mber 2015 and outline of the system remains unchanged, but the number of
previously unplaced families and genera is significantly reduced. This requires the
recognition of both new orders and new families compared to the previous
classification.
A major change is that the paper discontinues the use of bracketed families in favour
of now includes larger, more inclusive families. As a result, the APG III system
contains only 415 families. rather than the 457 of APG II.
APG – IV (2016)
Further progress was made by the use of large banks of genes, including those of
plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal origin, such as that of Douglas Soltis and
colleagues (2011). The fourth version was finally published in 2016. It arose from an
international conference hosted at the Royal Botanical Gardens in September 2015
and also an online survey of botanists and other users.
The broad outline of the system remains unchanged but several new orders are
included (Boraginales, Dilleniales, Icacinales, Metteniusales and Vahliales), some
new families are recognised (Kewaceae, Macarthuriaceae, Maundiaceae, Mazaceae,
Microteaceae, Nyssaceae, Peraceae, Petenaeaceae and Petiveriaceae) and some
previously recognised families are lumped (Aristolochiaceae now includes
Lactoridaceae and Hydnoraceae: Restionaceae now re-includes Anarthriaceae and
Centrolepidaceae; and Buxaceae now includes Haptanthaceae). Due to nomenclatural
issues, the family name Asphodelaceae is used instead of Xanthorrhoeaceae, and
Francoaceae is used instead of Melianthaceae (and now also includes Vivianiaceae).
This brings the total number of orders and families recognized in the APG system to
64 and 416, respectively. Two additional informal major clades, superrosids and
superasterids, that each comprise the additional orders that are included in the larger
clades dominated by the rosids and asterids are also included.
CLASSIFICATION OF
MAINPURI’S FLORA
ACCORDING TO APG SYSTEM.
Location of collection -:
The plant species (Angiosperms) are collected mainly from 3 main regions. But
the collection also consists of some scattered location which cannot be
comprehended in definite zone. Zones are created by keeping a central point
(using latitude and longitude) and making a circle around it with respective
radius. Two Zones are sub- divided into two further divisions which represent
relative concentration of the collection of specimen. (Inner zones have large no.
of collection as compared to Outer zone)
Major Zones -:
03. 27° 14' 28.464'' St thomas School, jail Single zone -0.6901 km
N chauraha , TV Station ,
79° 3' 39.6288'' ECHS hospital and
E phool bagh
Minor Zones -:
04. 27° 15' 32.5332'' Shivsinghpur , Sheetla Single zone – 0.2984
N Mata Mandir Km
79° 1' 56.8992'' E
The least collection was in months of May (late) and June (early) with
only few species like Gold mohar’ trees were blooming. This is
because of the harsh climatic condition with dry seasonal winds that
prevents the growth and blooming of non-woody plant species.
INVASIVE, NATURALIZED,
NATIVE, EXOTIC AND
CULTIVATED PLANT
SPECIES-:
A. Invasive Plant (Represented by Red color throughout the project)………
A plant that is both non-native and able to establish on many sites, grow
quickly, and spread to the point of disrupting plant communities or ecosystems.
There are 24 species found during collection.
Relative percentage -:
Plant species Percentage
A. Invasive Plant 15.78%
B. Naturalized Plant 17.12%
C. Native Plant 41.44%
D. Cultivated Plant 11.84%
E. Exotic Plant 13.82%
DIVERSITY OF ORDERS
There are plants of total 28 different orders has collected been collected in a time
period of 9 months (from Feb 02, 2022 to Oct 05, 2022).
3. Formal names are given only where monophyly has been firmly established.
CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER – 2
RESULT
CHAPTER – 3
CONCLUSION