MENG 222 - Lab 2-Manual Final
MENG 222 - Lab 2-Manual Final
MENG 222 - Lab 2-Manual Final
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL
ENGINEERING LABORATORY HANDOUT
Lab. No: 2
Student No:19700203
Group No.: 6
EVALUATION:
Report Presentation 10%
Introduction & Procedure 20%
Results & Calculation 40%
Discussion & Conclusion 30%
Overall Grade
calculation; we'll also compute error and slope at the end of the experiment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………..……………… i
INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………..…..….……….1 .1
OBJECTIVE………………………………………………..……….…….…..1 .1.1
……….1
THEORY……………………………………………………………………...….…1 .2
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE…………………………………………….……2 .3
ERRORS……......2 .3.1
GRAPHS…………………………………………………………………..……..…6 .5
List of Tables
List of Figures
……………………………………...…6
INTRODUCTION
The length, cross section, method of support (one or two supports), and material of
the beam all affect the degree of deflection, so the amount of deflection in the
beam made of ammonium is not the same as that of steel. The purpose of the
(L, A, and B), we can calculate the angle at points A and B using the equation
shafts, axes, cranks, levers, etc. Deflection helps to know the limit weight that can
be on the beam and there are tables for that (9.5 a) (9.5b), which are used to know
1. Objective
2. Theoretical Background
Bending occurs more often due to loading in shafts, axes, cranks, levers, etc. this must be treated
in the design and analysis of beams. This is treated by obtaining the maximum deflection as the
beam is subjected to a pure bending within the elastic range. Published equations shown in Table
1 of deflection in different types of beams under different loadings are utilized in such analysis;
Table 1: Beam Deflections and Slopes
3. Experimental Procedure
6. Apply the loads and measure the respective deflection indicated by the dial gauge.
4. Calculations
0 0 800g 8.75
1000g 10.46
Loading
0 0
1.96 3.29
3.92 6.59
5.88 9.89
7.84 13.19
9.8 16.4
E=low carbon steel =220000MPa
I=56.25mm
Unloading
Y (deflection,
P (load, N)
mm)
9.8 16.49
7.84 13.19
5.88 9.89
3.92 6.59
1.96 3.29
0 0
Error Percentage
Loading Unloading
0% 46.9%
44.3% 49.6%
40.3% 57.9%
36.9% 66.9%
36.8% 98.1%
36.2% 0%
DISCUSSION
We were able to determine the value of I using the data and equations after receiving
crucial information from the experiment, including the deflection and beam length values.
Finally, we can calculate the error by y theoretical mines y experiment over y theoretical
mutably 100, the figures Indicate the amount of deviation. Next, we entered the value of I
in the equation of y theoretical and we were able to find y theoretical. Human mistake or
incorrect tool calibration could be to blame for the disparity in the values.
Conclusion
when the deflection calculation has been completed. Even though the cantilever beam and
simply supported beam both received the same amount of force, it was found that the
cantilever beam's deflection was noticeably higher. Due to the shorter distance, it is what
caused it. as compared to a cantilever beam, the distance between the support and the
applied force.
Abstract
Summary of what was done in the experiment and your brief results
Theory
Please show all the date you have obtained and your calculations