Wave Optics All Derivations

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

WAVE OPTICS – ALL DERIVATIONS

Proof of laws of reflection

Consider a beam of light LM, whose wave front AP reaches A’P’ in time t, hence for any
point Q on the AP wave front must also reach A’P’ in time t.

Let speed of light in the medium be c, then

PP’ = ct and AA’ = ct

In AP 'P and AA 'P '


PP'  AA ' [Proved above]
AP'  AP ' [common]
APP '  AA 'P' [both 90o ]
 AP'P AA 'P ' [by RHS congruence rule]
 i  r [by cpct]

Proof of law of refraction (Snell’s law) using wave theory of light

Let speed of light in medium 1 be c1 and the speed of light in medium 2 be c2.

Let time taken by light to travel from AP to A’P’ be t, then

PP'  c1t , AA '  c 2 t


In ABD
BD
sini 
AD
In ADC
AC
sinr 
AD

BD

sini
 AD  BD  c1t  c1
sinr AC AC c 2 t c 2
AD
c
Also 1 2  1
c2
sini
1  2 
sinr

Which is Snell’s law.

Condition for constructive and destructive interference

We can represent the displacement of the waves from the sources S1 and S2 (see figure) at
point P on the screen at any time t by

y1  a1 sin ωt
and y 2  a2 sin(t  )
where  is the constant phase difference between the two waves.
The resultant at P, y  y1  y 2
 a1 sinωt  a2 sin(ωt   )
 a1 sinωt  a2 sinωt cos   a2 cos ωt sin 
 (a1  a2 cos  )sin ωt  a2 sin  cos ωt

Taking (a1  a2 cos  )  R cos θ


and a2 sin   R cos θ

 y  R cos θ sin ωt  R sinθ cos ωt  R sin(ωt  θ)


For R2 cos2 θ  R 2 sin2 θ  (a1  a2 cos  )2  (sin  )2
 a12  a22 (cos2   sin2  )  2a1a2 cos 

R2  a12  a22  2a1a2 cos 

But intensity of light I  R2

 I  a12  a22  2a1a 2 cos 

 I  I1  I2  2 I1I2 cos 

Constructive interference

For intensity of light to be maximum at P,

cos  1
phase difference   2nπ, where n  0,1,2,3,4........
If x be the path difference between S1P and S2P, then respective phase difference between
two waves will be


 x
λ

2nπ  x
λ
 x  nλ

Destructive interference

For intensity of light to be minimum at P,

cos   1
  (2n  1)π

x  (2n  1)π
λ
λ
x  (2n  1)
2
Ratio of intensity of light at Maxima and minima

Imax  a12  a22  2a1a2  (a1  a2 )2

Imin  a12  a 22  2a1a2  (a1  a2 )2

Imax (a1  a2 )2

Imin (a1  a2 )2

Ratio of intensity of light due to two sources

Let I1 and I2 and a1 and a2 be the intensities and amplitudes of light from slits S1 and S2
respectively. Then,
I1 a12

I2 a22

Relation between slit width (), I and a


ω1 I1 a12
 
ω2 I2 a22

Angular width in central maxima in diffraction pattern

The angular width of the central maxima is the angular separation between the directions of
the first minima on the two sides of the central maximum.

As condition for nth minima is d sinθn  nλ , so first minima is formed where n = 1. Therefore,
λ
sinθ1  .
d
λ
As we know, for small angles, sin θ  θ so θ  …..(i)
d

x1 x
Now from figure tan θ  and for small angles tanθ  θ , therefore θ  1 …….(ii)
D D

So, from (i) and (ii), we get

x1 λ

D d
λD
 x1 
d

2λD
Therefore, width of central maxima is 2x1  .
d

λ
Angular width of central maxima is 2θ  2
d

With of nth secondary maxima

Nth maxima lies between nth minima and (n+1)th minima


As, direction of nth minima, θn 
d

(n  1)λ
Direction of (n+1)th minima, θn1 
d

Therefore, angular width of nth secondary minima

(n  1)λ nλ λ
θn1  θn   
d d d

λ
So, linear width of nth secondary maxima = Angular width X D = D
d

You might also like