TG9 Temporary Roof Structures
TG9 Temporary Roof Structures
TG9 Temporary Roof Structures
NASC
N ATIONAL A CCESS & S CAFFOLDING January 2012
C ONFEDERATION
INDEX
1. Introduction
2. Scope
3. Management considerations
4. Types of construction
5. Components
6. Design methods
NASC
3 of 40
1. INTRODUCTION
A temporary roof or building is a sheeted structure designed to provide cover over an area from the effects of
weather, dust, etc. It may stand on the ground or on top of a building or be an extension of a scaffold round
a building. It may have fully sheeted walls and roof or only a roof or a roof with skirts.
This guide is intended to give design and construction information to the suppliers and erectors of temporary
roofs and buildings constructed with scaffolding materials and intended for use by contractors during the
building process.
It is not a comprehensive design guide but covers some of the more basic requirements and considerations
that should be made to provide an economical, but safe, completed temporary structure.
The usual types of sheeting employed for temporary buildings are as follows:
a) corrugated steel or corrugated aluminium;
b) flexible plastics;
c) flexible plastics covered panels.
For welding screens and other places where there is a fire hazard, corrugated steel sheeting should be used.
For structures with a very limited life, for example: at sports arenas and exhibitions, fixing cords of known
breaking strength may be used with flexible sheeting to cater for excessive gust wind speeds.
NASC
4 of 40
2. SCOPE
Whilst excluded from this guide, these structures will still require specialist design considerations.
NASC
5 of 40
3. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
A Full Risk Assessment and Method Statement should be prepared for all installations.
Where a temporary roof is standing on an existing roof or anchored to building, the principle contractor must
ensure that the structure can adequately withstand the additional imposed loads.
Check for hidden services that are likely to cause a problem with loads from standards or kentledge.
Where anchoring to a building is not permitted, ensure that sufficient space is available for buttressing.
The safe method of moving materials to site and to the actual place of installation.
The method of access to the place of the installation for erecting/dismantling and inspection.
The management and protection for members of the public and the workforce of other contractors.
Roof cover
100%
Partial cover – Re-erect or rolling
Sections requiring opening for lowering in of materials etc.
Training of workforce
Ensure that specific training is carried out for the selected roofing system and method of erecting and
dismantling.
NASC
6 of 40
4. TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION
Any of the above types of structure, may be constructed as static structures, mobile or as ‘telescopic’
arrangements (one roof passing over another)
Flexible Sheeting
● Purpose-made sheeting (PVC, Polythene etc) which may be fixed down to beams by various
methods or pulled through and retained by a purpose-made slot in the roof beams (commonly known
as ‘keder’)
NASC
7 of 40
5. COMPONENTS
Figure 5
Prefabricated steel beams are generally warren trusses with 48.3mm diameter chords at approximately
600mm centres. They are available in various standard unit lengths and are connected end to end by 2 or 3
bolts and a spigot at each gusset joint.
The load carrying capacity depends mainly on the frequency of restraint to the compression chord. Guidance
should be sought from the beam supplier for the actual load carrying capacities. Generally, if chords are tied
at the node positions (1.2m approx. intervals) then the maximum bending moment is normally in the range of
12 to 27 kN.m.
It is important that lateral restraint in the form of bracing is provided. Generally this bracing will be required
every 5th bay.
Note: depending on the loading conditions, the compression chord may be either top or bottom chord.
Figure 5 illustrates the use of bracing to achieve stability for groups of prefabricated beams. Generally this
bracing will be required in every 5th bay.
Lacing and bracing may be effected by the use of system components or tube & couplers.
The load carrying capacity largely depends on the frequency and type of restraint to the compression chords.
Guidance should be sought from the supplier/manufacturer for the actual capacities prior to carrying out detail
design.
NASC
8 of 40
It is important that lateral restraint in the form of bracing is provided. Generally this bracing will be required
every 5th bay.
Note depending on the loading conditions, the compression chord may be either top or bottom chord.
Since there is a wide range of this type of beam, with a wide range of properties, it is recommended that the
designer clearly indicates the specific beam used in the design drawing.
During erection, the panels should provide the necessary support for the
placement of subsequent panels.
Care should be taken when considering the safe erection of this type of
roof covering. It is not normally permissible to walk on the sheeting.
Figure 8
NASC
9 of 40
5.3.2 Plastic sheeting in track – commonly known as ‘keder’
When using this method, channels, which are securely
clamped to the truss beam, are provided, either within the
truss beam itself or by separate track components.
The sheets are drawn through the slots from one side of the
roof to the other.
NASC
10 of 40
6. DESIGN METHODS
The structure should be designed in accordance with recognized engineering principles and should take into
account the variability of materials, workmanship, site conditions and construction tolerances.
Temporary works systems should be designed with regard to the ease and safety of erection and dismantling.
The designers and suppliers should provide appropriate guidance on the sequence of erection and
dismantling of their design.
The designer will be expected to have considered the buildability of the structure and the design should take
account of the methods of construction. The designer should also provide the relevant information – with
regard to the significant risks involved in its construction.
The layout of the structure should be such that there is a well-defined system for transferring the loads to the
ground. When the form of the design has been chosen, the various structural elements and joints should be
designed and constructed so that the elements themselves and the rigidity of the joints between them are
adequate for their purposes and are used in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
The assembly as a whole should be stable against sliding and sway due to wind forces with a factor of safety
of 1.3 and against overturning with a factor of safety of 1.2. Wind loads should be calculated.
The cross fall of the roof should be such that rain water will be readily shed. The lateral thrusts derived from
arched or ridged roofs should be taken into consideration in the design and construction. In the case of
steeper ridged roofs, ties designed and inserted for this purpose should take the thrust.
The roof drainage arrangements should be agreed between the designer and the user. Gutters should have
a fall of not less than 1 vertical to 100 horizontal. The rain water pipes should be in agreed locations and tied
securely to the structure.
The load resulting from transverse wind forces may be taken account of by the incorporation of suitably stiff
framing and by a means for transferring the local wind loading to it.
The overturning of the structure as a whole may be prevented by ground anchors or kentledge round the
perimeter or by guys and anchors.
If the forces in the knee bracing and in the braces to tube and fittings trusses are too large to be resisted by
one coupler, then supplementary couplers should be added or the fittings pinned with shear pins. When
couplers interfere with the sheeting, a secondary rafter and raised purlins should be added above the truss to
carry the sheeting.
Longitudinal bracing should be inserted in the long walls and transverse bracing in the end walls or end gable.
Plan bracing should be inserted in the roof structure.
When the temporary building is an extension to an access scaffolding, the bracing and tying of this access
scaffold should be supplemented as necessary. The effect of the horizontal forces on the walls of the building
should be considered.
When a temporary building or roof is constructed on the top of an existing building, the anchor points should
be suitable to resist the loads imposed upon them.
NASC
11 of 40
6.2 Method of design
It is not recommended that the roof structure is designed in isolation from the supporting structure. This can
lead to inaccurate assessment of the forces at the ends of the roof trusses. It is preferable, and more accurate,
to consider the complete structural arrangement.
The overall roof and the side support scaffolds could be subjected to uplift and joints in the uprights and knee
braces may need to be strengthened by lapping. If the scaffolding structure is of insufficient self weight to
resist the uplifts, as may be the case in a low height, long span roof, then additional resistance must be
provided by anchors, tubes under window heads, kentledge or similar. Overturning and side sway of the total
structure must also be considered to determine the worst combinations of loads.
Any untied, free standing structure may need a buttressed scaffold system with anchors at foundation level
on any buttress lines and should be the subject of detailed design.
Particular attention should be given to the design and detail of the anchors. Refer to NASC Guidance TG4
(Anchorage systems for scaffolding) and TG16 (Anchoring to the ground).
To ensure that servicabilty limits are not exceeded, these loads must be considered in the most onerous
combinations to produce the worst effect on an element or on the structure as a whole.
Note: these loads should be applied in their true directions;
ie. wind loads should be applied perpendicular to the surface,
gravity loads can only act vertically downwards.
Mobile temporary structures may be subject to an overall uplift due to wind pressure. Consideration should
therefore be given to providing kentledge or other means of tying down such structures.
NASC
12 of 40
6.4.1 Dead loads
The dead load relates to the self weight of all the components forming the structure. These weights should be
obtained from the manufacturers data sheets or brochures.
Where the roof slope is too shallow, natural deflection may allow ponding to develop.
Wind loading should be evaluated using the information available in BS EN 1991-1-4 and take into account
the effects of the building shape and wind flow.
BS EN 1991-1-3 provides a method of calculating the expected maximum snow loads in the UK.
The snow loading should only be reduced if a practical snow management method has been agreed by
Contractor and Client.
NASC
13 of 40
a) A gable end of a building where a scaffold is built from the ground.
Tr
Side
Sheeting
Tie
Plan girder
Side
Sheeting
NASC
14 of 40
7. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION CHECK LISTS
7.1. Design
A) Has a feasibility study been carried out from a site visit?
B) Is the designer fully familiar with the product being used in the design?
C) Is there a full job specific design complete with working drawing and calculations?
F) Does the design confirm specifications and origin of authorised manufacturer’s loading data for
components used?
G) Do the proprietary system components used meet with the NASC Code of practice for the hire, sale and
use of system scaffolds?
H) Can the designed structure be built/dismantled in accordance with manufacturer’s recommended safe
system of work ? (User guide)
7.2. Construction
7.2.1 Method statement
State method for:
A) For erecting (and dismantling) by trained operatives ?
G) Rescue procedures ?
NASC
15 of 40
7.2.3 Documentation on site
A) Copy of site specific design drawing
B) FALL ARREST
If Fall Arrest measures are specified,
B1) Can a work restraint arrangement be used rather than fall arrest?
B2) Are the anchor points adequate, secure and to a specified/approved strength?
B3) Describe the anchor points.
B4) Is minimum practicable lanyard length used ?
B5) Are double lanyards used to ensure worker is attached at all times?
B6) Is there sufficient clearance with no obstructions below the workers at all times to allow the fall
arrest to deploy safely?
B7) Are rescue procedures specified to safely rescue a fallen worker?
B8) Is there a statement of P.P.E. equipment to be used?
C) Maintenance of structure?
NASC
16 of 40
APPENDIX A: SAFE SYSTEMS OF WORK FOR TEMPORARY ROOFS
With the introduction of the work at height regulations in 2005 (WAHR) have come new duties and
responsibilities affecting many aspects of scaffolding and access. The methods employed to build temporary
roofs are coming under increasing scrutiny in view of the high risk element involved with all of these structures.
AVOID WORK at This is unlikely to be an entire solution but there may be scope for reducing the
HEIGHT amount of working at height.
eg. Assembling sections on the ground and lifting into position.
PREVENT FALL 1. Can the roof be erected entirely from fully guarded platforms?
BY COLLECTIVE 2. Can the roof be built using MEWPs or independent towers?
EQUIPMENT 3. Can the roof design be chosen where most of the work can be carried out
from fully guarded platforms, rather than relying on harnesses? eg. A system
roof where the covering can be pulled across from the scaffold platforms,
rather than a CI roof which has to be worked on in order to install the sheets.
PREVENT FALL If harnesses have to be relied on, consider the use of lanyards which would
BY PERSONAL provide work restraint rather than a fall arrest system (ie it stops the person
WORK actually reaching an open edge at all).
EQUIPMENT Location and adequacy of anchor points need careful consideration.
MITIGATE THE eg. Nets below the working areas (if suitable anchor points are available and the
EFFECT OF nets themselves can be fitted safely)
FALL BY USING
COLLECTIVE
MEASURES
MITIGATE THE This is the last resort, and includes fall arrest lanyards. A detailed, job-specific
EFFECT OF method statement should be prepared: the risks are high and demand a
FALL BY USING proportionate level of planning. The location and adequacy of anchor points need
PERSONAL careful consideration. The type of lanyard should be suitable eg. twin lanyards
MEASURES for traversing beams (see SG4). Harness inspection regimes should be robust
(see HSE leaflet INDG367). Rescue procedure should be in place. Adequate
supervision to ensure harnesses are used correctly.
The effect of the Regulations is not to exclude particular methods but they do put pressure on those traditional
methods to justify a compliant safe method of building in-situ compared to more modern proprietory systems.
This can be demanding.
NASC
17 of 40
However, there are other issues that influence the ability to build temporary roofs safely, which include:
● Job specific risk assessment
● A job-specific design aimed at eliminating/reducing the risk of fall and other hazards identified by the
risk assessment.
● Scaffolders should be fully trained in the equipment used, with proof of training.
● The designer should be fully familiar with the equipment selected.
● For proprietary temporary roof systems, erection / user guides on the selected method should be
provided by the supplier.
● If personal fall arrest is utilised, with twin lanyards, job-specific rescue plan must be provided. Anchor
points should be determined for adequacy.
● A materials handling plan should outline the procedure for getting the materials to the workplace, both
to the scaffold working platform and their final fixed position on the roof.
● A job specific method statement developed from the above.
Figure A.1
NASC
18 of 40
From the safe working platform (a), secure beams to uprights, or as detailed by the design.
From the platform (a), secure the 1st and 2nd purlins and plan brace this bay.
Figure A.2
Using boards placed between the bottom chords of adjacent beams, and using double short lanyards, proceed
up the beams fitting the remaining purlins and bracing. Materials can be passed up the structure from a
temporary walkway located on top of the purlins that are already in place. This temporary walkway should be
complete with an appropriate means of minimising the consequences of a fall.
Note: Provision should be made to prevent temporary boards slipping from the beam and there should be an
appropriate procedure in place for moving the boards from each position.
Corrugated steel profile sheets should be hoisted up to the designated loading area, which has been designed
to take their weight, and stored in a safe manner. These sheets are normally weighted down to prevent
displacement from the scaffold structure.
Figure A.3
From platform (b), place the 1st sheeting row and secure with roofing couplers and over-tubes.
Using the secured sheeting as a platform, and the over-tubes as footholds/handholds and anchorage for
double lanyards used for work restraint, place the next row of sheets and secure. Repeat until sheeting is
completed.
When the temporary roof is complete, the leading hand will sign a hand-over certificate for submission to the
principal contractor.
NASC
19 of 40
APPENDIX B: OTHER COMPONENTS
B.1 Properties
Table B1
Max. permissible purlin spacingfor limiting stress and deflection of the sheeting
Pitch of Sheet
0.4kN/m2
corrugations thickness
mm mm (g) m
Table B2
Note: Whilst this table gives the maximum spans that can be obtained when the load is uniformly distributed,
consideration should be given to the possibility of localised concentrated loads. The principle source of this
form of loading will be from personnel erecting and dismantling the sheeting and from the stacking of material.
If the purlin has a dual role of sheet support and lateral restraint to the beams, the lateral restraint spacings
will be considered as the worst case.
When a specification requires a fully watertight roof, it may be necessary to seal the joints with suitable mastic
or sealing strip.
Side laps are usually 1 ½ to 2 corrugations wide, and as with end laps, may require some form of mastic or
sealant when a watertight roof is specified.
At the edges of the roof where the pressure co-efficient is high, it may be necessary to stitch the side laps
together. This can be carried out using either pop rivets, self tapping screws, blind fixings or as a last resort
nuts and bolts. These fixings would normally be placed at 450mm c/c.
NASC
20 of 40
B.3 Gutterings and downpipes
The drainage arrangements should be agreed between the designer and the user. Early discussion can save
a great deal of time and argument, particularly where discharge points need to be varied through the contract.
Some contracts may specify the requirement for the provision of natural light whilst also remaining waterproof.
Natural lighting can be achieved using translucent sheeting where the corrugation sizes are compatible with
those of the steel sheets.
When using this form of sheeting, either by itself or in conjunction with steel sheeting, it will be necessary to
check the following points:
Compatibility with the steel sheeting used for the remainder of the roof.
Durability – Effects from sunlight etc.
Strength – This should be looked at in two ways:
● Span between purlin members – It may be necessary to reduce the spacing between
the purlins.
● Fixings – Frequency and type.
All of the above points should be checked with the sheet supplier to ensure that the sheeting is suitable for
the specific application.
Where the bolt passes through the sheeting, it should always be located on the crest of a corrugation. This
positioning avoids the possibility of leakage, particularly from a bolt located at the bottom of a corrugation
which forms the normal run off flow line.
The hole through the sheet can be waterproofed using either of the following two methods:
(a) Diamond shaped steel washers curved to take up the sheet profile, sandwiching a diamond shaped
bitumastic washer on to the sheet face.
or
(b) A proprietary plastic washer with either a loose or captivated nut that forms a seal with the sheet face as
the nut is tightened down.
For the safe working load of bolts refer to the manufacturers information as it will vary depending on:
The grade of steel used.
The method of threading.
The method of manufacture.
The thickness of the steel sheet.
NASC
21 of 40
It must be borne in mind when designing bolt groups that it is not always the bolts that provide the weak link.
In many instances the sheeting is weaker than the bolt and can collapse or tear under load.
Figure B.1
When using this type of connector, it would be the failure of the sheet which would be the deciding factor rather
than failure of the bolt.
B.6 Purlins
In temporary roof systems these are usually scaffold tubes which are fixed to the main supporting members
(or rafters.)
Where the main supporting member is some form of I beam or lattice structure then in order to reduce the
effect of lateral buckling, restraint must be provided. Here the purlin takes on the dual role of a sheet support
and lateral restraint member.
The safe bending Moment of Resistance of a new standard scaffold tube 48.3mm dia. x 4mm wall thickness
= 0.99 kNm.
In axial compression, the allowable loads should be as shown in NASC TG20, “Guide to good practice for
scaffolding with tubes and fittings”.
This particular connector needs to be of the type that will carry the required load but will not interfere with the
sheeting line.
NASC
22 of 40
Of the scaffold connectors currently on the market, the following fulfil these objectives:
This coupler will adequately cope with the slip load required to laterally restrain the
rafter.
The major load from uplift created by the wind forces will be adequately coped with
by this fitting, because the load is at right angles to its normally loaded mode.
Figure B.2
At right angles, normal to the roof surface, this fitting can safely be rated at 1.75 kN.
Figure B.3
NASC
23 of 40
APPENDIX C: DESIGN EXAMPLE
General arrangement
Design loading
a) Dead loading
Self-Weight of roof structure (from manufacturer’s data)
= 0.25 kN/m run along beam
b) Service loading
Two concentrated load of 1 kN placed 1m each side of ridge.
c) Imposed loading
c.1) Snow loading
Ground snow load = 0.4 kN/m2 – from BS EN 1991-1-3 (Slough – Zone 2)
Altitude = 145m
Characteristic snow load = 0.2 + 0.1 Zone + (145-100)/525 = 0.48 kN/m2
Shape coefficient = 0.8
Design snow load = 0.38 kN/m2 = 0.95 kN/m @ 2.5m crs
c.2) Wind loadings
Map wind speed, Vb = 21 m/s – from BS EN 1991-1-4 (Slough)
Altitude = 145m
Altitude factor, calt = 1 + 145/1000 = 1.145
Basic wind speed, Vb = 21 x 1.145 = 24.05 m/s
Cprob = 1.0, Cdir = 1.0, Cseason = 1.0
Twind (topographical factor) = 1.0
Basic wind pressure, qb = 0.613 x Vb2 / 1000 = 0.35 kN/m2
Combined exposure factor, Cc = 2.08
Peak wind pressure, qp = 0.7 x 0.35 x 2.08 = 0.51 kN/m2
NASC
24 of 40
Normal wind type A – Case 3 Normal wind type B – Case 4
NASC
25 of 40
APPENDIX D: SNOW LOADING
Method:
Determine ground snow load or zone
Determine altitude
Determine shape coefficient for roof pitches not greater than 30° = 0.8
Combine for design loadings
Useful tips:
For determination of altitude
google earth – can determine altitude anywhere in world;
– may be downloaded from www.google.com
≤ 30° 0.8
0.8 ( 60 – a )
30° < a < 60°
30
10° 0.8
15° 0.8
20° 0.8
25° 0.8
30° 0.8
45° 0.4
Table D.1
NASC
26 of 40
Figure D.1 – Basic snow loading, Smap (kN/m2)
NASC
27 of 40
APPENDIX E: WIND LOADING
The basic data for the design of structures to resist wind forces are contained in BS EN 1991-1-4 and the UK
National Annex to BS EN 1991-1-4. Additional background information is given in PD 6688-1-4. This guide
uses a simplified form of the method given in the BS EN that is suitable for the majority of temporary works.
The simplification will give comparable or conservative results compared with the BS EN. The designer is not
precluded from using the NA and BS EN 1991-1-4 to calculate the wind forces if the situation warrants it.
Although the method of determining wind pressure has changed, the simplified method now recommended
has adopted many of the philosophies of the earlier methods.
Where a temporary structure is erected between 50m and 100m high in areas of significant topography, the
wind pressures should be calculated by reference to the NA to BS EN 1991-1-4.
NASC
28 of 40
Topography factor, Twind
Where the ground is nominally flat, i.e. the average slope is less than 1:20 and at the base of steeper slopes,
the value of the topography factor is unity, Twind = 1.00.
Where there are hills or slopes the wind profile changes and the topography, known as “orography” in BS EN
1991-1-4, can become significant. The values for the topography factor Twind for falsework erected up to 50m
in height for other conditions of hills or escarpments are shown in Fig. E.2.
Values for topography factor appropriate for the site should be considered for the wind acting in ALL directions,
and not just the orientation of the falsework structure.
For a temporary structure erected on the ground the value of z would be taken as the height from the ground
to the top of the structure.
When considering the forces on the temporary structure, the value for z should be taken as the actual height
of the structure. However, if the temporary structure is erected in an elevated position above the surrounding
ground level, for instance at the top of a tall structure, the reference height z, would be measured from the
ground, although the actual structure affected by the wind would only be its own storey height.
An allowance can be made for the effect of surrounding general buildings, such as housing or woodlands, by
using a height displacement (hdis). The displacement height is the lesser of the value in the following two
equations:
hdis = 0.8 have
or hdi = 0.6 h
where hdis is the displacement height (m)
have is the average obstruction height in the area (m)
h is the height of the considered structure for calculating z.
Where the temporary structure is spaced more than six times the average obstruction height away from the
nearest obstruction, the full height of structure is used and hdis = 0.
NASC
29 of 40
31
30
30 29
29
28
28
Inverness
27
Aberdeen
30
Oban Dundee 26
29
Perth
25
28 Glasgow Edinburgh
24
27
Londonderry 26 Newcastle
Carlisle
28 Belfast
23 York Kingston
Preston Leeds upon-Hull
25 Liverpool Manchester
Galway Dublin
Sheffield
Stoke
Nottingham
Limerick
22
Leicester
Norwich
Waterford Birmingham
Aberystwyth
Northampton Ipswich
Cork Bedford
23
21.5
Oxford
Swansea
LONDON
Cardiff
Bristol
28 24
27 26 25 Taunton Brighton
Bournemouth
Kilometres
0 40 80 120 160 Plymouth
22
0 20 40 60
Statute miles
80 100
23
Channel Islands 24 m/s
NASC
30 of 40
Table E1: Combined exposure factor, Cc
Note: Town values are to be considered if more than 2 km inside the edge of the town.
** for hdis see Figure E.3
NASC
31 of 40
Wind factor Twind = 1.00
Lu Ld Lu
(b) Moderately steep terrain, average slope < 1:5 (c) Moderately steep terrain, average slope < 1:5
Lu Ld Lu
(d) Steep terrain, average slope > 1:3 (e) Steep terrain, average slope > 1:3
Lu horizontal distance of the slope upwind Ld horizontal distance of the slope downwind
6 have
2 have
h dis
h
have
NASC
32 of 40
External pressure coefficients
Figure E.8
External pressure coefficients
for mono-pitched roof – Case 3
NASC
33 of 40
≤ 10m Ce1 = -0.7 + Ka
10m – 25m Ce1 = +0.01 x Span – 0.8 + Ka
≥ 25m Ce1 = -0.55 + Ka
(+ve values are downward pressure)
Where,
Ka = a – 10
100
a = pitch angle in degrees
NASC
34 of 40
APPENDIX F: BACKGROUND TO WIND PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS
Discussions within the working group (CEN/TC53 – WG14) for a pan-European standard, highlighted that a
wide variation of pressure coefficients were documented in the member countries.
To make the method of evaluating wind loading uniform, a simplistic approach was required that would satisfy
all existing national codes. The coefficients shown in Appendix E have been derived from this exercise.
In order to compare the effects of the proposals with other codes, exhaustive analysis was carried out to a
wide range of roof sizes and configurations.
All primary load cases:
1 EN1991
3 BS6399
4 France
5 Scandinavia
6 USA
7 WG14 Case 1
8 WG14 Case 2
Figure F.1 – Comparison of bending moments induced by coefficients from different codes
NASC
35 of 40
Comparison of bending moments
for windward side of roof
20
18
16
14
EN 1991 - Eurocode
Bending moment
12 UK - BS6399
France
10 Scandinavia
WG14 1
8
WG14 2
6
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Roof span (m)
Figure F.2
20
18
16
14
EN 1991 - Eurocode
Bending moment
12 UK - BS6399
France
10 Scandinavia
WG14 1
8
WG14 2
6
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Roof span (m)
Figure F.3
Although results for the ‘unified’ coefficients on the leeward side tend to yield values less than those specified
by BS.6399, they are higher than those specified by BS EN 1991-1-4; ie., conservative.
Note: the BS.6399 results include all design cases for both 0° and 180° wind directions.
NASC
36 of 40
APPENDIX G: USEFUL REFERENCES
EN 74 Steel couplers
BS 5975 Code of practice for temporary works procedures and the permissible stress
design of falsework
NASC TG20 Guide to good practice for scaffolding with tube and fittings.
NASC
37 of 40
NOTES
NASC
38 of 40
Whilst every effort has been made to provide reliable and accurate information, we would welcome any corrections to information provided by the Writer which
may not be entirely accurate, therefore and for this reason, the NASC or indeed the Writer, cannot accept responsibility for any misinformation posted.