GEC 8 Ethics Syllabus - Servento
GEC 8 Ethics Syllabus - Servento
GEC 8 Ethics Syllabus - Servento
VISION
CPSU as the leading technology-driven multi-disciplinary University by 2030
MISSION
CPSU is committed to produce competent graduates who can generate and extend leading technologies in multi-disciplinary areas beneficial to the community.
GOAL
CPSU commits to deliver quality higher and advanced education through instruction, research, extension, production and administrative support services.
We shall endeavor to:
1. Continually improve its Quality Management System (QMS) at par with International standards;
2. Provide timely, efficient and effective delivery of products and services;
3. Satisfy the needs and expectations of the customers and relevant Interested parties; and
4. Uphold applicable statutory, regulatory, organizational and International standard requirements.
For universities: an ability to participate in the generation of new knowledge or in research and development projects Graduates of State Universities and Colleges must, in
addition, have the competencies to support “national, regional and local development plans.”
CENTRAL PHILIPPINES STATE UNIVERSITY
Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
1. Articulate the rootedness of education in philosophical, socio-cultural, historical, psychological, and political contexts.
2. Demonstrate mastery of subject matter/discipline.
3. Facilitate learning using a wide range of teaching methodologies and delivery modes appropriate to specific learners and their environments.
4. Develop innovative curricula, instructional plans, teaching approaches, and resources for diverse learners.
5. Apply skills in the development and utilization of ICT to promote quality, relevant, and sustainable educational practices.
6. Demonstrate a variety of thinking skills in planning, monitoring, assessing, and reporting learning processes and outcomes.
7. Practice professional and ethical teaching standards sensitive to the local, national, and global realities.
8. Pursue lifelong learning for personal and professional growth through varied experiential and field-based opportunities.
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
B – Bestow munificently the endowed talents, knowledge, skill, and attributes to all clients of learning.
S – Specialize more fully the field of discipline through further exploration of knowledge and professional advancement.
E – Embody the Cenphilian spirit of exercising academic freedom and spirit of innovation.
D - Develop a sense of urgency to respond to the changing needs of society, the country and the world.
IV. COURSE DESCRIPTION : Designed for teachers of ethics under the new CHED General Education Curriculum, the seminar course serves as a training also for
those who will teach Ethics to students throughout the country. Thus, the course deals with both the substance as well as the pedagogy of
ethics. The former concerns the principles of ethical behavior in modern society at the level of the person, society, and interaction with the
environment and other shared resources (CMO 20 s2013), while the latter pertains to the various methods of teaching the course, as well as
the skills necessary to accomplish it, in a way that incorporates the most recent principles of and insights into teaching in the college level.
V. CREDIT : 3 UNITS
VI, CREDIT HOURS : 3 hours classroom contact per week and 54 hours per semester
VII. COURSE OUTCOMES : At the end of the semester, the students must have:
6. Made sound ethical judgments based on principles, facts, and the stakeholders.
7. Developed sensitivity to the common good; identified and managed group dynamics, and facilitating discussions.
8. Understood and internalized the principles of ethical behavior in modern society at the level of the person, society, and in interaction
with the environment and other shared resources.
9. Demonstrated the skills necessary and appropriate in the teaching of ethics in the college level, such as identifying and manage group
dynamics, and facilitating discussions.
Desired Learning Outcomes Course Content References Time Teaching and Assessment Task Resources
(DLO) Frame Learning Materials
(hrs) Activities
Midterm
At the end of the unit, the Unit III: The Act PowerPoint
students must have: Presentation
Stages of Moral John Santrock, 15hrs Reporting Summative test
1. Reflected their own stages Development Reason and Educational Hands out
Impartiality, Feelings and Psychology Report Compilation
of development
2. Shared experiences of Reason
Reporting Classroom
7 Step Moral Reasoning
growing morally Participation
Model Report compilation
Difference Between Graded Recitation
Reason and Will
At the end of the unit, the Unit IV: Frameworks and PowerPoint
students must have: Principles Behind our Moral AQUINAS, THOMAS. 12 hrs. Reporting Presentation
“On Law, Eternal Law, Engaged in all
Disposition
1. Differentiated Aristotelian and Natural Law.” Report Compilation classrooms activities Hands out
and St. Thomas Aquinas’ Summa like brainstorming,
Aristotelian Ethics
Theologiae. Vol 28, discussion, role
Ethics
edited by Thomas
2. Practiced positively playing, graded
CENTRAL PHILIPPINES STATE UNIVERSITY
Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental
John Santrock,
Educational
Psychology
Examination
Midterm Examination 1.5 hrs.
Paper
1. Major Examinations
2. Grade oral recitation
3. Projects and Activities (per unit outputs as specified in the assessment)
4. End of course learning log (reflective journal) and portfolio (compilation of assessment outputs) on test development and reflection papers
5. Attendance (online)
X. GRADING SYSTEM:
Knowledge : 40%
60% - Written Examination
40% - Summative Test
Skills : 50%
40 % - Output (Projects, Portfolio and others)
30 % - Class Participation
CENTRAL PHILIPPINES STATE UNIVERSITY
Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental
15 % - Activities
15% - Assignments
Attitude : 10%
50% - Class Behavior
50% - Participation, Awareness, Interest
Total 100%
XI. REFERENCES :
AQUINAS, THOMAS. “On Law, Eternal Law, and Natural Law.” Summa Theologiae. Vol 28, edited by Thomas Gilby, 5-97. New York:
Black Friars/McGraw Hill, 1966.
ARISTOTLE. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Martin Oswald. Indianapolis:Bobbs-Merrill EducationalPublishing, 1983.CAMPBELL,
ANGELES, ANTONETTE AND ROWENA AZADA. “Medicine Prices, Control and the Pharmaceutical Industry.”Monograph produced by
the Jose B. Fernandez, Jr. Ethics Center and the Ateneo Graduate School of Business, 2011.
a. Rubrics (Portfolio: Different Types of Grading System, TOS Samples, Different Type of Test)
Criteria 91-100 (Excellent) 81-90 (Very Satisfactory) 71-80 (satisfactory) 61-70 (Good/Need to
Improve)
A. Organization an Accuracy All required data are well All required data are Required data are included but A significant number required
of required Items organized, accurate data are organized, accurate data are data’s are not well organized data are missing and are not
included, with a significant included, with few significant and accurate. included.
numbers of addition. numbers of additions.
B. Concept and Contents Items are clearly demonstrate Items clearly demonstrate Items demonstrate some of Items do not demonstrate
that the desired learning most of the desired learning the desired learning outcomes basic learning outcomes for
outcomes for the term have outcomes for the term. The for the term. The student has the term. The student has
been achieved. The students students gained a general gained some understanding of limited understanding of the
gained a significant understanding of the concepts the concepts and attempts to concepts.
understanding of the concepts and applications. apply them.
and applications.
C. Overall Presentation of the Data are clearly introduced, Data are introduced and well Data are not well introduced Data are not introduced and
Output well organized, and creatively organized, showing and somewhat organized, lack of organization.
displayed, showing connection connection between items and showing some connection
CENTRAL PHILIPPINES STATE UNIVERSITY
Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental
CATEGORY 4 3 2 1
Shows a full understanding of Shows a good understanding Shows a good understanding Does not seem to understand
Content
the topic. of the topic. of parts of the topic. the topic very well.
Volume is loud enough to be Volume is loud enough to be Volume is loud enough to be
Volume often too soft to be
heard by all audience heard by all audience heard by all audience
heard by all audience
members throughout the members at least 90% of the members at least 80% of the
Volume and Speaks members. Often mumbles or
presentation. Speaks clearly time. Speaks clearly and time. Speaks clearly and
Clearly cannot be understood OR
and distinctly all (100-95%) the distinctly all (100-95%) the distinctly most (94-85%) of the
mispronounces more than
time, and mispronounces no time, but mispronounces one time. Mispronounces no more
one word.
words. word. than one word.
Stands up straight, looks
Stands up straight and
relaxed and confident. Slouches and/or does not
establishes eye contact with Sometimes stands up straight
Posture and Eye Contact Establishes eye contact with look at people during the
everyone in the room during and establishes eye contact.
everyone in the room during presentation.
the presentation.
the presentation.
Facial expressions and body
Facial expressions and body Very little use of facial
Facial expressions and body language sometimes generate
language are used to try to expressions or body
language generate a strong a strong interest and
generate enthusiasm, but language. Did not generate
Enthusiasm and interest and enthusiasm about enthusiasm about the topic in
seem somewhat faked. The much interest in topic being
Preparedness the topic in others. Student is others. Student seems pretty
student is somewhat prepared, presented. Student does not
completely prepared and has prepared but might have
but it is clear that rehearsal seem at all prepared to
obviously rehearsed. needed a couple more
was lacking. present.
rehearsals.
Presentation is less than 3
Presentation is 5-6 minutes
Time-Limit Presentation is 4 minutes long. Presentation is 3 minutes long. minutes OR more than 6
long.
minutes.
CENTRAL PHILIPPINES STATE UNIVERSITY
Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental
2. Explained the influence of Filipino culture on the way the students look at moral experiences and
solve moral dilemmas. I P P
6. Made sound ethical judgments based on principles, facts, and the stakeholders. I P P
7. Developed sensitivity to the common good; identified and managed group dynamics, and
facilitating discussions. I I P P
8. Understood and internalized the principles of ethical behavior in modern society at the level of the
person, society, and in interaction with the environment and other shared resources. I P
9. Demonstrated the skills necessary and appropriate in the teaching of ethics in the college level,
such as identifying and manage group dynamics, and facilitating discussions. D D D D
Legend:
I – Introductory
P – Practice (with supervision)
D- Demonstrated
CENTRAL PHILIPPINES STATE UNIVERSITY
Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental