AB0502 Managing Sustainability AY2021-22 S1 Outline v03
AB0502 Managing Sustainability AY2021-22 S1 Outline v03
AB0502 Managing Sustainability AY2021-22 S1 Outline v03
With the universal acceptance of the United Nations’ Brundtland Commission report, sustainability
became a major challenge for business leaders and managers. Its deceptively simple core theme of
"development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs” is now central for organizational success.
Achieving organizational sustainable development and operation involves the engagement with and
management of the full range of stakeholders; including customer, shareholder, corporation,
employees, community, government, non-government and others. Geographical dimensions range
from local to regional to global.
Many organizations now accept sustainability as important to their mission and have strategized for
this, yet outcomes have been mixed, at best. Organizations struggle to align their missions and
sustainable objectives, something that critics, including their important stakeholders, are quick to
point out and often do so loudly to organizational detriment. Poorly conceived or absent
organizational ethics are increasingly a key facet for these conflicts.
The aim of this course is for you to understand the planning, development and management of
sustainability as a central and integral component of successful organizational outcomes as
undertaken in the Asian region. The course has an applied bias that brings the essence of
sustainability theory into practical industry, government and community application where the
You do not require prior knowledge of the principles or application of sustainability, as this course
will be delivered accordingly. In this course, you will address large-, medium- and small-scale
organizations in a variety of global contexts, with an emphasis on Asian. Ways of thinking about
these, the issues involved and the crafting of proactive strategies are relevant to a range of business
contexts that you will encounter during your careers. Thus a higher-level intent of this course is the
development of skills for dealing with complex problems in general.
C) Course Content
1. Principles of Sustainability
2. Sustainability in Asia
3. Sustainable Asian Cities
4. Sustainable Asian Cultural Heritages
5. Sustainable Asian Natural Heritages
6. Sustainable Enterprises
7. Managing Sustainability
E) Formative feedback
1. You will receive formative feedback through written responses to your assignments and oral
feedback through in-class discussion.
2. You may approach me at any time to discuss your progress for this course.
Approach How does this approach support you in achieving the learning outcomes?
Seminars The interactive seminars and mini-lectures, where there is ample opportunities
for open discussion on the conceptual questions raised, in the class allows you
to think critical and to share your ideas and concept with the class. This also
allows you to better appreciate the concepts clearly.
Seminar cases These allow you to analyse some current problems and thus help you to achieve
understanding of industry application.
Assignments The assignments require you to generate, analyse and deliver professional
content in a guided manner.
In-class / out-of- Some learning outcomes for this course are practical in nature and cannot be
class activities achieved by reading and writing. In-class activities provide opportunities for
achievement of such learning outcomes.
There is no textbook for this course. These are the initial readings. Other readings will be
introduced during the seminars. [RAS: All links verified. If click does not work, copy link and
paste or copy title and search.]
1. Aguirre, Abby 2018 “He Fixes the Worst P.R. Crises Imaginable. Then Came Harvey
Weinstein.” The New York Times 01 June 2018.
2. Ahuja, Anjana 2017 “Smart cities might not be such a bright idea” Financial Times 22
November 2017
3. Aqil Haziq Mahmud 2018a “‘Cannot sell ... so they burn’: What’s next in the uncertain
future for plastic waste in Singapore?” Channel News Asia 03 June 2018
4. Aqil 2018b Business Times 2018 “ESG Factors in Play; companies must take
sustainability metrics seriously.” Editorial, The Business Times, Singapore, 28 November
2018, p 22.
5. Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen 2008 Sustainability Indicators. 2nd edition. London UK:
Earthscan. ISBN: 9781844072996. GE140.B435 (Reference source)
6. Bingham-Hall, Patrick 2016 “Garden City – Mega City: Rethinking cities for the age of
global warming” Oxford, England: Pesaro. (Reserves NA2542.36.B613)
7. Carroll A. B. 1991 The pyramid of social responsibility: Toward the moral management of
organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, July-August, 39-48.
8. Chew Hui Min 2020 How urbanised Singapore is learning to live with its wildlife. CNA 22
August 2020. Retrieved 16 December 2020 at
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-wildlife-conservation-city-
in-nature-reserves-hornbill-13034650
9. Chinoy, Sahil 2018 “The Places in the U.S. Where Disaster Strikes Again and Again” New
York Times 24 May 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/24/us/disasters-
hurricanes-wildfires-storms.html
10. Choo 2018 Country Report Singapore, United Nations.
11. Demetriou, Danielle 2018 'Life is so different here now' - Inside Japan's 'zero-waste'
village The Telegraph 04 March 2018
http://subscriber.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/04/life-different-now-inside-japans-zero-
waste-village/
12. Edgecliff-Johnson 2019 “Beyond the bottom line: should business put purpose before
profit?”, Financial Times, London. 04 January 2019.
13. Esty D and A Winston 2006 “From Green to Gold” Hoboken NJ: Wiley. ISBN:
9780470393741. HD30.255.E82 2009 (Reference source)
14. Friedman M. 1970 The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits in The
New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, 32-33, 122 and 126
15. Goodman, Peter S. 2018: In Britain, Austerity Is Changing Everything The New York
Times, 28 May 2018.
16. Hardin, G. 1968 The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, New Series, Vol. 162, No. 3859
(Dec. 13, 1968), pp. 1243-1248.
17. Kuper, Simon 2018 “Airbnb: ‘It’s a cash machine. It’s magical. You are paid to go on
holiday’”
18. LEX 2018 Airbnb/ sharing is wearing | Financial Times 27Dec2018.
19. Lin, Cheryl 2020 'It’s a flight to flexibility': Why co-working spaces are seeing rising
demand amid COVID-19. CNA 11 December 2020. Retrieved 16 December 2020 at
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/co-working-space-demand-flexible-wfh-
work-from-home-covid-19-13723222
Good academic work depends on honesty and ethical behaviour. The quality of your work as a
student relies on adhering to the principles of academic integrity and to the NTU Honour Code, a
set of values shared by the whole university community. Truth, Trust and Justice are at the core of
NTU’s shared values, which are also core values in business, industry and government.
As a student, it is important that you recognize your responsibilities in understanding and applying
the principles of academic integrity in all the work you do at NTU. Not knowing what is involved
in maintaining academic integrity does not excuse academic dishonesty. You need to actively equip
yourself with strategies to avoid all forms of academic dishonesty, including plagiarism, academic
fraud, collusion and cheating. If you are uncertain of the definitions of any of these terms, you
should go to the NTU Academic Integrity website for more information. Consult your instructor if
you need any clarification about the requirements of academic integrity in this course.
Consultation
Instructor Office Location Phone Email
Hours
le Café de Singapour (The Singapore Café). There you have it. Class has not yet commenced and
already you know one of our weaknesses: coffee. < It has to be good or better in quality. > Social distancing
etc permitting, the intention is to retire after each class to CB&TL on campus (or remain in the seminar
room if necessary) for informal discussions on class matters or any other that strikes you. Social distancing
etc permitting, we will also be available at a café in the city, near a major MRT station, for similar purpose;
probably on Saturdays. These are optional one-hour consultation sessions. [RAS/WA: Closed for the
season!]
You will be assessed through assignments and participation. There will be two (2) assignments.
You are strongly encouraged to pursue topics that interest you. Should guidance be required
on deciding a topic or refining a topic, please see the instructor during class. All topics for both
assignments require approval by the instructor.
This individual assignment will be based on seminar discussions that may include round-table
and talk-show format seminars, readings, experiential immersions or other sources. The intent
of assignment A is to study a case scenario, as agreed with your instructor, to determine its
ideal and current long-term sustainability. No proposals on how to address sustainability
deficiencies are part of assignment A. (Assignment B relates to solutions/proposals.) You will
develop topics during the leading seminar sessions and seek confirmation from the instructor
during class.
Submission format is to be decided by each student: slides, poster, infographic, video, text or
other as appropriate for the matter to be presented within the allocated presentation time.
1. Brief statement of assignment title/topic that indicates the focus of the study.
2. Concise statement of sustainability objectives.
3. Detailed ideal sustainability outcomes.
4. Detailed actual current situation.
5. Statement on the existing sustainability that is the gap (difference) between the ideal
sustainability and the actual current situation, which may include positive as well as
negative aspects.
An elementary sample example where more, much more, than this basic analysis is required
for submission:
It might make sense for you and some of your classmates to have a common topic for the focus
of their assignments A and B, where items 1, 2 and 3 of assignment B would be dealt with
individually as assignment A, with each group member addressing one aspect of the common
topic, though this is not required.
Assessment: Your document submissions and oral presentations will be evaluated in terms of
the rubric for assignment A, below. Please do note the weightage for your individual
presentation (oral and document.)
Notes:
1. Submission (electronic only): 11:59 PM Saturday 18 September 2021.
2. Submission file naming and mode: To be announced.
3. Presentations: In seminar during week 7.
This is a group assignment where the focus will be sustainability contexts, as agreed with your
instructor, that are current in Asia.
Students will work in the groups that have already been formed. All students are required to
have full commitment to, and participation in, group assignments. Please advise the instructor
early if any group member is not contributing a fair share of effort to agreed group work. It is
important that students act to protect their own interests and the integrity of the course as well
as the school and its brand value. Opting for S/U is not acceptable for devoting less than full
attention and effort to group work.
Some of the work for this assignment will be undertaken during supervised seminar sessions.
Submission will be a video of six (6) minutes duration, where time runover will incur penalty.
The following aspects need to be considered. All of these do not necessarily need to be
presented in the final video but definitely need to be thought through as the assignment is
undertaken and the video is planned:
Assessment: Submissions will be evaluated in terms of the rubric for assignment B, below.
Notes:
1. Submission (electronic only): 11:59 PM Saturday 06 November 2021
2. Submission file naming and mode: To be announced.
3. Presentations: Video only, with no separate oral support, in seminar during week 13.
4. Non-attendance for presentation scores naught for professionalism of presentation.
Notes:
1. It is necessary to attend class and to comply with submission requirements so as to
earn marks for each component of participation assessment.
All group members are required to complete a peer evaluation for each member of the group
(i.e., including a self-assessment) for assignment B. The completed peer evaluation form
must be submitted individually to me via Eureka on NTULearn immediately after assignment
B has been submitted. Identity of appraisers will be kept confidential and will not be revealed
to other team members.
I will use a member’s ratings (on a scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 7 is high) to award marks
for the team project to other members by computing the average rating that a member
receives from other members (i.e., excluding each member’s self-rating). A member’s mark
for the team project will be computed as follows:
1. If a member’s average rating is ≥ 4, the member will receive 100% of the overall
mark awarded to the team project.
2. If a member’s average rating is < 4 but ≥ 3, the member will receive 80% of the
overall mark awarded to the team project.
3. If a member’s average rating is < 3 but ≥ 2, the member will receive 50% of the
overall mark awarded to the team project.
4. If a member’s average rating is < 2, the member will receive 30% of the overall mark
awarded to the team project.