Evidence Based Practice Manual
Evidence Based Practice Manual
Evidence Based Practice Manual
The five steps of EBP – or 5 A’s – begin and end with the
patient
Professional expertise.
Questions are often only partly formulated, which makes finding answers in the
literature a challenge. Breaking down the question into its component parts and
restructuring it so that it is easier to find answers is an important first step in EBP.
Most clinical questions can be divided into four components, abbreviated as PICO:
PICO(T):
Different types of questions require different study designs. Once you have
identified your question type, you will be better able to target the specific studies
that best answer your clinical question.
-While looking for the evidence, one should first look for relevant Systemic
review.
-If the relevant Systemic review cannot be found, search for individual studies
I. You have a patient who has difficulty exercising due to COPD and
you wonder if pursed lip breathing techniques may improve their
endurance
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
Internet search engines - e.g. Google/ yahoo - accumulate vast quantities of results,
the majority of which will be irrelevant to your search.
Almost anyone can publish a website, and the majority of sites are not peer
reviewed or externally evaluated.
How current is the information provided? Regularly updated websites are generally
more reliable sources of information.
For clinical questions, it’s best to search custom search engines or databases as
these will get you to your answer more quickly and you can be more confident of
the quality of information provided.
SEARCHING PUBMED
1. Run a search for Knee OA rehabilitation. How many hits do you get?
3. How many hits do you get for the last ten years?
4. How can you add more Limiters/ filters to your search to get specific results?
OR
AND
NOT
7. Run your Knee OA rehabilitation search again. Click Create alert. What does
this do?
9. On your search results page, open Advanced. What are some other examples
you can search by instead of the default All Fields?
10. Attach a screenshot or draw a table as an evidence. Also write down the
number of the filtered results you got at the end.
USING MESH
1. Use your own PICO question and analyze your research question into
aspects:
E.g. IS USING MASSAGE THERAPY BETTER THAN SPLINTING IN
IMPROVING PAIN IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL
SYNDROME.
PROBLEM
INTERVENTION
COMPARASION
OUTCOME
#1
#2
#3
#1
#2
#3
4. Write down an example of truncation and wild card. Does any truncation or
wild card apply to your PICO search terms? Write them down.
#1
#2
#3
6. How are you going to use the above combined terms in Pubmed? Explain in four
steps.
6. Attach the screenshot or make a table of how many results did you get at the
end. Also paste the URL of the page.
Using the topic of your PICO question, find the articles for the mentioned below
categories and add references:
2) CASE REPORT
3) CROSS SECTIONAL
4) SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
5) META- ANALYSIS
6) CLINICAL GUIDELINE
Look at the first article? What is its PMID? What does PMID stand for?
Open the article citation (or multiple ones if needed) and find an example of each of the
following:
DOI
Similar articles
Cited by
Publication type
MeSH terms
Cite
Favorites
Is the article available at pubmed or freely available? If so, where can you access it?
1. Run a simple search for Osteoarthritis. How many hits do you get?
2. What is the purpose of “Display selected records” and how would you use
it? Briefly define.
3. Mention the correct sequence of the “Method” Pedro show when we search
for different form of evidence.
5. Paste the screenshot of the filters and limiters you have applied to retrieve
the articles on Osteoarthritis.
My profile
My library
Create alert
4. Using Boolean operator OR and AND how many hits now you get?
allintitle
Now that you have acquired evidence relevant to your question, it is necessary to
assess the quality, design and applicability of that evidence. Critical appraisal is the
process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its
trustworthiness, its value and its relevance in a particular context.
Ask yourself:
What is the PICO(T) of the study and is it close enough to the PICO(T) of
your clinical question?
How well was the study done? Is the quality of the study good enough to
produce results that can be used to inform clinical decisions?
What are the results and are they applicable to your patients and your
clinical setting?
https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/critical-appraisal-tools
new evidence.
assessment