See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/330811304

Investigation of energy-efficient solid desiccant system for the drying of

wheat grains

Article  in  International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering · January 2019

DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.3854

CITATIONS READS

17 461

4 authors, including:

Shazia Hanif Muhammad Sultan

MNS- University of Agriculture Multan Bahauddin Zakariya University
18 PUBLICATIONS   45 CITATIONS    280 PUBLICATIONS   2,699 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Special Issue "Advances in Agricultural Engineering Technologies and Application" in "Agriculture" journal (IF 3.41) View project

Adsorption-based Atmospheric Water Harvesting View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Muhammad Sultan on 01 February 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 January, 2019 Int J Agric & Biol Eng Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org Vol. 12 No.1 221

Investigation of energy-efficient solid desiccant system for the drying of

wheat grains

Shazia Hanif1*, Muhammad Sultan1,2*, Takahiko Miyazaki3,4, Shigeru Koyama3,4

(1. Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan;
2. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan;
3. Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan;
4. International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan)

Abstract: The study investigates the applicability of solid desiccant system for drying of freshly harvested wheat grains in
order to reduce the moisture to an optimum level. Fast and low-temperature drying systems are required by today’s drying
industries in order to provide economical and safe drying. Therefore, comparison of desiccant drying has been made with the
conventional method in terms of drying kinetics, allowable time for safe storage, the total time for drying cycle, and overall
energy consumption. It has been found that the air conditions of proposed desiccant drying system provides a high drying rate
and longer allowable storage time for the safe drying. As the desiccants possess water adsorbing ability by means of vapor
pressure deficit, therefore, the desiccant system successfully provides low-temperature drying which ensures the quality of
wheat grains. Overall energy consumption is estimated for both conventional hot air drying and desiccant drying system. It
has been found that the desiccant system requires less energy as drying is accomplished at minimum level of air flow and within
allowable storage time. In addition, the overall performance index of the desiccant system is higher at all temperatures.
The study is useful for developing a low-cost and sustainable drying technology for various agricultural products.
Keywords: desiccant, drying, grain, wheat, performance evaluation
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.3854

Citation: Hanif S, Sultan M, Miyazaki T, Koyama S. Investigation of energy-efficient solid desiccant system for the drying
of wheat grains. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2019; 12(1): 221–228.

agricultural produce, i.e. color, surface texture, cooking behavior,

1 Introduction etc. In addition, the drying temperature should be as low as
Moisture adsorbing/absorbing materials have been used for the possible to keep the nutrient retention. High drying temperature
drying of agricultural products including wheat grains from ancient affects the product quality extremely e.g. in the form of decaying of
time[1]. Desiccants are hygroscopic materials and possess vitamin C which is found in many fruits and vegetables and
moisture adsorbing ability due to vapor pressure difference[2]. considered an index of nutrient loss[8]. All the agricultural
Therefore, it has been used for dehumidification and products consist on numbers of the layers of biological materials
air-conditioning processes for various agricultural applications e.g. which are very sensitive to temperature, hence drying of
greenhouses[3] and agricultural product storage[4]. Certainly, agricultural products is a complex process. It accomplished by
desiccants possess the drying potential that can be used for various two phase, i.e. constant rate and falling rate period[9]. During
agricultural products, and consequently many studies have been falling rate period, drying process is very slow as moisture remove
reported in the literature[1,5-7]. In desiccant based drying system from the inside of the product to the surface of the product. If the
(DDS), the desiccant unit handles the latent load of drying air agricultural products expose to hot air for long period of time, it
whereas heater is used for sensible heating of drying air to access causes to burn or over dry of the outer surface. DDS provides low
the minimum vapor pressure. The ability of DDS to deal the temperature and fast drying of vegetables to maintain its color and
sensible and latent component of vapor pressure distinctly[2] makes texture[10]. In addition, low regeneration temperature makes it
it versatile for drying of various agricultural products. possible to use solar energy or waste heat from the industry[11].
The drying conditions always influence the quality of Similarly, desiccant based systems can also be applied for
various other applications which are not limited to drying, e.g.
temperature and humidity control systems[2]. For example, in case
Received date: 2017-09-24 Accepted date: 2018-12-27 of greenhouses, several new concepts of CEA such as vertical
Biographies: Takahiko Miyazaki, PhD, Professor, research interest: thermal farming and plant factories are presented in the literature[12,13].
energy conversion systems, Email: miyazaki.takahiko.735@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp; Some of the research on the sustainability and clean energy
Shigeru Koyama, PhD, Professor, research interest: thermal engineering, Email:
application for high-tech greenhouses and plant factories can be
koyama@cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
*Corresponding author: Muhammad Sultan, PhD, Assistant Professor, found via the analysis of microclimate control and environment
research interests: thermal air-conditioning and evaporative cooling for modelling[14-20]. It has been shown that a greenhouse design for
agricultural applications. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Bahauddin tropical lowlands that benefits from high natural ventilation rates
Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan. Tel: +92-333-610-8888, Fax: can efficiently keep the temperature and humidity like the outside
+92-61-9210298, Email: muhammadsultan@bzu.edu.pk; Shazia Hanif, PhD,
Researcher, research interest: desiccant drying for agricultural storage.
climate, which has been shown to be 60%-75% optimal for tomato
Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, growth[21]. The potential of a successful production can be higher
Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan. Email: agha_shaz@yahoo.com. in a naturally ventilation greenhouse than cultivating outdoors or in
 222 January, 2019 Int J Agric & Biol Eng Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org Vol. 12 No.1

a traditional plastic covered greenhouse[22,23]. Focusing this study Similarly, in another study by [7], the desiccant drying consumes
solely on drying application, Figure 1 presents the influence of high only 13.29 MJ/kg energy as compared to 60.4 MJ/kg in case of
drying temperature on the quality of wheat grains which clearly cocoa beans. In case of DDS, it is very important to select the
shows the damage in wheat quality. In addition, pictorial view of optimum working range of system components to obtain maximum
insect attack[24] is also superimposed on the same figure which energy saving[37]. The drying time decreases with the decrease in
could be expected when non-favor able temperature/humidity air humidity and increase in air temperature, and collectively based
conditions are employed to the grains. In this scenario, desiccant on the net vapor pressure difference between grains and the
drying can be an optimum solution to provide low temperature encountered air. Therefore, the DDS can also play a role to
drying by providing a certain level of vapor pressure difference. reduce the drying time by providing fast adsorption rate process.
Drying of agricultural produce is usually expensive and it is In this regard, many studies on desiccant materials have been
considered high energy consuming process, i.e. 10%-25% of the reported for total moisture adsorption equilibrium[38,39] and
total energy[25]. Conventional drying methods include, drying by moisture adsorption rate[40,41]. Similarly, different parameters of
airflow, vacuum drying, and freeze-drying but these methods result desiccant based drying system are optimized for energy
in low drying rate[26-28]. Mainly there are two types of strategies minimization, e.g. drying air temperature and drying rate[42];
in practice, one of them is hybrid technology (combination of two desiccant rotor speed for optimum dehumidification and enthalpy
or more different technologies) i.e., radio-frequency and recovery[43]; maximum energy saving[44]; desiccant rotor speed,
microwave, infra-red combined with convective dryers[29], temperature and velocity of regeneration air[43]. Consequently, the
microwave combined with freeze dryers[30] and infra-red combined study is objected towards the performance evaluation of DDS in
with freeze dryers[31] and others are desiccant based drying compared with conventional drying system (CDS). Consequently,
technologies, for example, heat pump drying[32]. drying speed and corresponding energy requirements have been
estimated and compared for both systems.

2 Proposed desiccant drying system

In this study, we proposed a solid DDS for the drying of wheat
grains. Drying of agricultural products is crucial not only to avoid
fungus/mold attacks but also to increase the shelf life of
agricultural products[4]. It helps to minimize the demand and
supply gap which ultimately brings economic stability of the
agricultural products. Consequently, this can improve food
shortage and malnutrition issues worldwide. Figures 2a and 2b
represent the schematic and psychrometric diagrams of the
proposed solid DDS. It mainly consists of: (i) a desiccant wheel
used to dehumidify the air; (ii) heater for process air heating
(bio-mass/gas or electric); (iii) drying bin/structure; (iv) heater for
regeneration of desiccant wheel (electric driven or preferably
bio-mass/gas driven). The numbers 1 to 7 showed in Figure 2 are
the sequence and states of conditions of air during the drying
process. It starts from the suction of ambient air by a desiccant
wheel from state 1 to 2. At state 2, the specific humidity
decreases from Y1 to Y2 due to adsorption of the moisture from the
air by the desiccant wheel. Furthermore, air temperature increases
Figure 1 Influence of ambient air conditions on the quality of from T1 to T2 due to the heat of adsorption released by desiccant
wheat grains: Effect of drying temperate (top right) and pictorial material[33]. At state 3, air from the desiccant wheel further heated
view of insect attack (bottom)[24] up to a certain temperature represented by T3 to establish a certain
On the other hand, the DDS can be operated on low vapor pressure deficit between the wheat grains and the
regeneration temperature[33] that can be supplied via low-grade encountered air. Thus, dehumidified and heated air moves
waste heat preferably from solar thermal energy. Therefore, DDS forward from state 3 to state 4 while drying the wheat grains due to
can also help to provide low-cost drying with less energy the vapor pressure deficit[3]. The air takes moisture from the
consumption. grains while passing through it and therefore specific humidity
Post-harvested agricultural products including wheat grains increases (from Y3 to Y4) and temperature decreases (from T3 to
possess high moisture level at the time of harvest and therefore T4). The net conditions depend on the drying air condition
cannot be stored for a long time unless proper storage/treatment has equilibrium with wheat grains. In Figure 2, state 5 to state 6
been employed[4]. In this regard, wheat grains need to dry up to a shows the heating of air from T5 to T6 for the regeneration of the
level of 14% moisture content (dry basis) to avoid mold growth as desiccant wheel. At state 6, heated air streams are passed through
well as the insect’s attack[34,35]. It has been found in the literature the desiccant which takes the adsorbed water as thereby the specific
that the DDS can address the environmental and economic issues of humidity increases from Y6 to Y7. During the drying process,
drying of wheat grains. According to [36], a drying system ambient air is continuously passed through the adsorption and
requires 19 h to bring the moisture content from 82% to 13% (wet regeneration sides of the desiccant wheel. The detailed procedure
basis) with the aid of air dehumidification whereas it takes 24 h for system analysis and operating conditions are discussed in the
without dehumidification, thereby, 21.5 kWh energy can be saved. coming heading.
 January, 2019 Hanif S, et al. Investigation of energy-efficient solid desiccant system for the drying of wheat grains Vol. 12 No.1 223

−C1
ln ERH = exp(−C3 M ) (2)
T3 + C2
where, M represents the moisture content (dry basis) of the wheat
grains in this study. The dry basis moisture content is the ratio of
wheat moisture contents and dry grains of wheat, kg/kg. In
order to reduce the moisture content of the wheat grains for safe
annual storage to the optimum limit of the moisture content (i.e.
14%)[34], the drying time can be calculated by means of drying rate
simply by using the well-known drying rate equation as given by
Equation (3):
a. Schematic diagram
∑
t
( M i − M i +1 )
t = Wd i =1
(3)
⎛ dw ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝ dt ⎠
where, t is drying time, s; M is moisture content (dry basis); Wd is
drying matter of wheat grains, kg; and w is weight of moisture, kg.
⎛ dw ⎞
The term ⎜ ⎟ is drying rate, kg/s, which is calculation by
⎝ dt ⎠
means of following relationship:
⎛ dw ⎞
⎜ ⎟ = ka A(Yo − Yi ) (4)
⎝ dt ⎠
where, ka and A are the mass transfer coefficient, kg/(s·m2) and
area of drying structure/bin, m2, respectively; Yi and Yo are absolute
humidity of air, g/(kg DA) at inlet and outlet end of dryer,
respectively.
As the mass transport is not a constant rate process, therefore,
drying is considered as combination of constant and falling drying
rate. It is assumed that the moisture is removed from the grain
b. Psychrometric cycle of the system
surface by the dry airflow for the first drying period. Later, water
Figure 2 Proposed solid desiccant drying system (DDS) for
ceased to behave as it is on free surface and transported from the
drying of wheat grains
grain inside to the surface, thereafter, drying rate decreases which
3 Research methodology is known as falling drying rate. Consequently, thin layer drying
model in the form of time and temperature, is used to predict the
In this study, authors used 10 t of wheat gains initially moisture content of grains during drying process as defined by
containing typical 26% of moisture contents (dry basis), for the Equation (5)[48]:
calculations of CDS and DDS. The dryer size is determined by
Mt − Me
the drying area required per kg of wheat grains. Total volume = ( τ1T3 + τ 2 )exp( τ 3t ) + ( τ 4T3 + τ 5 ) exp( τ 6t ) (5)
Mo − Me
required for wheat grains is calculated by means of Equation (1):
W where, constants are τ1 = 0.03197, τ1 = –1.009; τ3 = –0.034; τ4 =
V= t (1) –0.032; τ5 = 1.9918; τ6 = –0.009. The parameters T, t, Mt, Mo and
ρb
Me are drying air temperature (°C), drying time (min), moisture
where, Wt is total weight of moist wheat grains, kg; and ρb is the
content (dry basis) at time t, initial moisture content (dry basis) at
wheat bulk density, kg/m3. Therefore, volume of the drying bin of
t = 0, and equilibrium moisture content at t = ∞, respectively.
the wheat grain is 12.98 m3. The dryer area and height used for
Equilibrium moisture contents (Me) is calculated by using
the drying calculation are 7.42 m2 and 1.75 m, respectively. As
Modified-Chung-Pfost Equation as defined by Equation (2) in the
very high drying temperature can affect the quality of wheat grains,
following form[48]:
therefore, drying temperature is limit to 60°C according to the
guidelines of FAO[45]. 1 ⎛ T + C2 ⎞
Me = ln ⎜ 3 ln RH 3 ⎟ (6)
The modified Chung-Pfost Equation[46] can be used for the −C3 ⎝ −C1 ⎠
measurements of equilibrium relative humidity (ERH) of the air As thin layer drying model equation cannot precisely evaluate
streams in the drying chamber. Therefore, it has been used in this the drying time of 10 t wheat grains, therefore, for the sake of
study for the measurement of ERH of the air in the wheat drying simplicity and counterbalance, it is only used to calculate the
chamber. The modified Chung-Pfost Equation has been defined successive change in moisture content used in Equation (3), i.e.
in the form as given by Equation (2)[46]. It can be noticed that the Mi – Mi+1. However, mass transfer coefficient is determined by
Equation (1) uses three empirical coefficients, i.e. C1, C2 and C3, assuming packed bed air flow and governing equations as defined
which are supposed to optimize for the best fit against the moisture by Equations (7) to (10)[49]:
isotherm equations for the particular grains. In this study, the
h Nuk ⎛ 1 − ε ⎞
optimized parameters are obtained for the wheat grains from ka = = ⎜ ⎟ (7)
c p C p Dp ⎝ ε ⎠
literature [47]. Consequently, the numerical values of the
1 2 1
optimized parameters of C1, C2 and C3 for desorption isotherms of
N u = (0.5 Re 2 + 0.2 Re 3 ) Pr 3 (8)
wheat are 545.25, 64.047 and 0.17316, respectively.
 224 January, 2019 Int J Agric & Biol Eng Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org Vol. 12 No.1

ρvD p mechanical energy consumed by the system is the sum of

Re = (9) mechanical energy used for the handling and associated
μ (1 − ε )
processes[53]:
cp μ
Pr = (10) Emec = Emec,1-2 + Emec,3-4 + Emec,6-7 (16)
k Emec= (ΔPAregVregt)1-2+(ΔPAadsVadst)3-4+(ΔPAinVint)6-7 (17)
where, ka is mass transfer coefficient, kg/(s·m2); h is heat transfer where, ΔP is pressure drop, kPa; t is drying time, s; Abin is drying
coefficient, J/(m2·s·°C); k is thermal conductivity, W/(m·K); Nu, Re bin area, m2; Aads and Areg are areas, m2, of the desiccant wheel at
and Pr are Nusselt number, Reynolds number and Prandtl number, adsorption and regeneration sides, respectively; Vin is air velocity,
respectively. The void fraction (ε) is estimated by means of bulk m/s, at drying bin inlet whereas Vads and Vreg are the air velocities,
(ρb) and true (ρt) densities, kg/m3 of wheat grains, respectively[50], m/s, of the desiccant wheel at adsorption and regeneration sides,
i.e. ε = 1 – (ρb/ρt). The resulted value of ε is equal to 0.4375. The respectively. For the conversion of electrical energy to
particle diameter (Dp) is estimated by means of Dp=6Vp/Ap. The mechanical energy, 46% device conversion efficiency factor is
value of particle volume (Vp) m3, and particle surface area (Ap) m2, used[55]. The pressure drop across the processes and regeneration
obtained from the reference [51], consequently, the resulted Dp = side of the wheel is assumed 0.325 kPa whereas for grain drying
0.00347 m. The amount of moisture (Ww) to be removed from the structure, it is calculated according to reference [56]:
grains is calculated by using the following relationship:
ΔP ⎛ 123.9 ⎞ ⎛ 1 − ε ⎞ ⎛ ρVin 2 ⎞
= 2⎜ + 1.657 ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
(M i − M f ) (18)
Ww = Wt (11) ΔL ⎝ Re ⎠ ⎝ ε ⎠ ⎝ Dp ⎠
(100 − M f )
ΔP
where, Ww and Wt are weight of moisture and total weight of moist where, pressure drop per unit length of drying bin, m, in the
ΔL
grains, respectively; Mi and Mf are initial and final moisture
direction of air flow. Specific energy consumption (SEC) is
contents (wet basis), respectively. The moisture contents can be
calculated which is the energy utilization for removing one kg of
changed to wet basis (Mwb) from dry basis (Mdb) and vice versa by
moisture for drying of wheat grains as given by [57]:
the following relationship.
E + Emec
M db SEC = th (19)
M wb = (12) Ww
100 + M db
where, SEC, Ww, Eth, and Emec are the specific energy
Wheat grains in the top most layers of the drying bin contains
consumption(kJ/kg), the weight of water to be removed (kg), total
high-level moisture as compared to the bottom layers, therefore,
thermal and mechanical energy consumptions (kJ), respectively.
these are supposed to more susceptible to quality deterioration due
The coefficient of performance (COP) index is defined by the total
to molds, fungus, etc. Therefore, the allowable storage time is set
energy consumed for removing water quantity (Ww) divided by the
by means of temperature and moisture content of the grains in the
total input energy to the dryer, as given by:
top most layers of drying structure. Allowable storage time model
Ew Ww h fg
of wheat drying is used to determine the number of days allowed COP index = = (20)
for drying of grains[52]. The allowable storage time (tallow) equation Eth + Emec Eth + Emec
of drying systems can be written in the following form as given where, Ew is the energy consumed to remove mw, kg, of moisture
by: and it is calculated from latent heat of vaporization of water vapors,
log(tallow) = τ7 + τ8Mt + τ9T4 (13) hfg, i.e. Ew=Wwhfg[53]. Latent heat of vaporization of water vapors,
where, tallow, Mt and T4 are allowable storage time, d, moisture kJ/kg, is calculated at any temperature by a correlation given by
content wet basic, %, and air temperature, °C, respectively. The [58], i.e. hfg = 2.503×106 – 2.386×103(Tabs – 273.16).
constant are τ7 = 4.129; τ8 = –0.0997; and τ9 = –0.0576. On the other The simplified scheme and arrangement of the methodology
hand, time required to dry the grains depends on air flow rate, used for the analysis of conventional and desiccant drying systems
therefore, drying calculations are optimized within allowable are given in Figure 3. The points presented in Figure 3 are
storage time. Consequently, air flow rates are selected corresponding to the state points used in Figure 2. The conditions
accordingly for the purpose of optimization. of air associated with the desiccant wheel are estimated from
Total energy consumption for DDS is calculated by the sum of reference [59]. The basic principle is to create vapor pressure
thermal and mechanical energies. In case of DDS, thermal energy deficit between the product and environment to accelerate the
is used for air heating (Eth 2-3) and desiccant regeneration (Eth 5-6). moisture removal. DDS control the latent load of the ambient air
However, thermal energy is used for heating of air solely (Eth 2-3) in which helps to achieve drying at low temperature[60]. As low
the case of CDS. Input thermal energy associated with desiccant temperature and low humidity of drying air helps to conserve the
drying system for heating and regeneration is calculated as nutrients[61]. In the reference study, a desiccant wheel of 580 mm
follows[53]: diameter is used. The desiccant wheel is made up of polymer
Eth 2-3 = FaCpt(T3 – T2) (14) based desiccant material with frontal area ratio (process:
Eth 5-6 = Fa,rCp,r(T6 – T5) (15) regeneration) of 1:0.7. Consequently, the state 1 to state 7 shown
where, t is the time, s; Fa,r and Fa are the air mass flow rates, kg/s, in Figure 2 can be further explained as follows:
during regeneration and heating, respectively; Cp,r and Cp are the State 1: Typical ambient air condition, i.e. T1 = 32°C and Y1 =
specific heat capacities of air, kJ/(kg·K) during regeneration and 13.37 g/kg DA. 
heating, respectively. The parameters T6, T5, T3 and T2 are the State 2: Dehumidification of air takes place, and outlet
regeneration temperature, ambient air temperature, dryer inlet air conditions of the desiccant wheel are estimated from the reference
temperature and desiccant wheel outlet air temperature, °C, study available in literature via reference [59]. 
respectively. It is noteworthy that the specific heat capacity and State 3: Sensible heating of the air by using air heater (electric
density of moist air is calculated from literature [54]. In addition, or preferably bio-gas/mass) for the desired T3. 
 January, 2019 Hanif S, et al. Investigation of energy-efficient solid desiccant system for the drying of wheat grains Vol. 12 No.1 225

State 4: Humidity of air is increased as it carries moisture from indicated that increase in drying air temperature accompanied by a
the wheat grains. This process is supposed to follow the decrease in drying time. This is due to the fact that increase in air
isenthalpic process.  temperature speeds up the heat transfer between drying air and
State 5: It is same as state 1 conditions, i.e. ambient air wheat grains due to the vapor pressure difference. In addition,
conditions.  high temperature may not favorable in order to keep the optimum
State 6: Sensible heating of the air at T6 to regenerate desiccant quality of wheat grains as reported in the introduction section. As
wheel.  the maximum recommended drying temperature is 60°C for wheat
State 7: Exhaust air conditions of the regeneration air from the and 44°C for seeds[37]. However, beyond this limit, it may affect
desiccant wheel. It corresponds to the process 1 to 2. the quality of grains in terms of color, vitamins, and nutrients.
Grains drying at industrial level requires safe storage limit of
moisture contents, otherwise, spoiling of grains may be the
development of molds and fungus. Therefore, the allowable safe
storage time is calculated by using Equation (13). Table 1
represents the allowable safe storage time for both drying methods
at different supply air conditions. The allowable time for safe
storage is based on initial moisture content and equilibrium
temperature (T4). Therefore, DDS method gives more allowable
time as compared to the conventional system because it possesses
low temperature at return air side (T4). Drying of grains within
the allowable time period is shown in Table 1. By increasing the
supply air temperature for the same drying system, drying air
velocity is adjusted to compensate the drying time within the
allowable time. It can be seen that relatively higher drying air
velocity is used for high-temperature supply air because allowable
time decreases with high temperature. Higher air velocity is
considered in case of conventional drying, it has less potential to
carry out moisture and takes more time for the drying of the same
quantity of grains. Minimum drying air velocity is optimized for
all cases to complete the drying cycle which is about 2 h before the
allowable time. Thermal and mechanical energy consumption per
Figure 3 Simplified scheme and arrangement of the methodology kg of dried grain is calculated for the moisture removal from 26%
used for the analysis of drying systems to 14% on dry basis, as presented in Figure 6. Total energy is
increasing with the increase in drying temperature for both systems.
4 Results and discussion
It is ranging from 0.46 MJ to 0.50 MJ/kg of grain for DDS,
The equilibrium moisture content (EMC) is determined for whereas, it is ranging from 0.46 MJ to 0.56 MJ/kg of grain in case
DDS and CDS by using Equation (6). Figure 4 presents the of CDS. On the other hand, thermal energies consumed are
drying of wheat grains from initial moisture content 26% (dry basis) 0.44 MJ/kg, 0.46 MJ/kg, 0.48 MJ/kg and 0.484 MJ/kg of grain for
to equilibrium moisture content at different drying air temperatures DDS and 0.46 MJ/kg, 0.50 MJ/kg, 0.53 MJ/kg and 0.55 MJ/kg of
varying from 50°C to 60°C. The drying curves show that drying grain for CDS, at drying air temperature of 44°C, 50°C, 55°C and
rate is constant at the start of drying process whereas it decreases as 60°C, respectively. Conventional drying system consumed more
the moisture content approaches to the equilibrium moisture thermal energy as compared to the desiccant drying for all drying
content. Drying rate decreases as the moisture gradient between air temperatures. Drying of grains at relatively higher ambient air
the inside and outside of the grains decrease near the equilibrium humidity is the fact, which brings higher equilibrium moisture
conditions. In comparison with CDS, the DDS possesses high content for CDS method. It ultimately decreases moisture
drying rate and takes relatively less time to approach a particular removal rate due to high vapor pressure. Therefore, high drying
EMC value in order to provide a certain level of wheat grains air velocity is required to complete drying cycle within allowable
drying. This behavior is consistent at all drying air temperatures. storage time which results in more energy consumption.
As EMC is a function of temperature and relative humidity,
therefore, DDS drying air conditions are associated with the small
value of EMC hence more driving potential for moisture ratio as
expressed by Equation (5). However, drying air conditions of
CDS require high EMC consequently delay in moisture content
removal.
The effect of drying air temperature on drying cycle is
presented in Figures 5a and 5d for both drying methods at 44°C,
50°C, 55°C and 60°C, respectively, in order to dry wheat grains up
to a standard level of moisture content, i.e. 14% dry basis. It has
been found that desiccant drying requires less drying time at all
drying temperatures as compared to conventional drying method.
This is due to the fact that dehumidified air provides more driving Figure 4 Effect of drying temperature on the drying time for
force for evaporation at same drying air temperature. It is also wheat grains by means of drying curves
 226 January, 2019 Int J Agric & Biol Eng Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org Vol. 12 No.1

a. 44°C b. 50°C

c. 55°C d. 60°C
Figure 5 Comparison of drying time between CDS and DDS in order to dry wheat grains from 26% to 14% moisture contents
at drying air temperature of 44°C, 50°C, 55°C and 60°C
Table 1 Optimum storage and drying time for conventional and desiccant drying systems at different drying air temperature
DDS CDS
Drying air
temperature/°C Air velocity Drying cycle time1 Optimum storage2 Air velocity Drying cycle time1 Optimum storage2
T4/°C T4/°C
/m·s-1 /h /h /m·s-1 /h /h

44 0.074 23.66 126.21 128.62 0.169 26.08 91.99 93.35

50 0.076 25.28 101.25 103.80 0.155 27.49 75.85 77.43
55 0.076 26.31 88.46 90.60 0.153 28.6 64.66 66.83
60 0.082 27.64 73.19 75.91 0.149 29.65 56.69 58.10
Note: 1 Time calculated for wheat grains drying from 26% to 14% moisture content. It depends on relative humidity and temperature of drying air, whereas drying air
velocity is adjusted in order to complete the drying cycle with in the limit of optimum storage time. 2 Optimum storage is the time permitted for drying of wheat grains
at particular drying conditions, which depends on moisture content (before drying) and temperature of wheat grains in the top layers of drying structure.

of CDS. The desiccant based drying method requires less energy

consumption as compared to CDS at drying temperatures, and the
results presented in Figure 7 are similar to the one obtained by [62].
Consequently, coefficient of performance (COP) index is estimated
by means of Equation (20) and results are presented in Figure 8 for
both drying methods. The COP index decreases with increase of
drying temperature for both methods. However, it is ranging from

Figure 6 Thermal and total energy consumption by DDS and

CDS systems at different drying temperatures in order to dry wheat
grains from 26% to 14% moisture content
Specific energy consumption (SEC) required to remove the
unit mass of moisture from the wheat grains at different drying
conditions in estimated for desiccant and conventional drying
systems as shown in Figure 7. It has been increasing with the
increase in drying temperature and ranging from 4.86 MJ/kg to Figure 7 Comparison of specific energy per kilograms of
5.25 MJ/kg in case of DDS and 4.88 MJ/kg to 5.84 MJ/kg in case moisture required by desiccant and conventional drying methods
 January, 2019 Hanif S, et al. Investigation of energy-efficient solid desiccant system for the drying of wheat grains Vol. 12 No.1 227

0.45 to 0.49 for desiccant drying and 0.40 to 0.49 for conventional air-conditioning system for storage of fruits and vegetables: Pakistan
drying. Therefore, it has been concluded that the desiccant based preview. Evergreen Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences
and Green Asia Strategy, 2016; 3(1): 12–17.
drying system provides low-cost and energy-efficient drying at fast
[5] Erdogan M, Graf S, Bau U, Lanzerath F, Bardow A. Simple two-step
drying rate while employing low drying temperature which ensures assessment of novel adsorbents for drying: The trade-off between adsorber
the quality of the wheat grains. size and drying time. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017; 125: 1075–1082.
[6] Kant K, Shukla A, Sharma A, Kumar A, Jain A. Thermal energy storage
based solar drying systems: A review. Innovative Food Science &
Emerging Technologies, 2016; 34: 86–99.
[7] Sari Farah D, Ambarita H, Napitupulu F H, Kawai H. Study on
effectiveness of continuous solar dryer integrated with desiccant thermal
storage for drying cocoa beans. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 5.
Elsevier, 2015; pp.32–40.
[8] Marfil P H M, Santos E M, Telis V R N. Ascorbic acid degradation
kinetics in tomatoes at different drying conditions. LWT - Food Science
and Technology, 2008; 41(9): 1642–1647.
[9] Fournier M, Guinebault A. The shell dryer-modeling and
experimentation. Renewable Energy, 1995; 6: 459–463.
[10] Nagaya K, Li Y, Jin Z, Fukumuro M, Ando Y, Akaishi A.
Low-temperature desiccant-based food drying system with airflow and
temperature control. J. Food Eng., 2006; 75: 71–77.
[11] Uyun A S, Miyazaki T, Ueda Y, Akisawa A. Experimental investigation
Figure 8 Overall performance comparison between conventional of a three-bed adsorption refrigeration chiller employing an advanced mass
and desiccant drying system for different operating drying recovery cycle. Energies, 2009; 2: 531–544.
temperatures [12] Shamshiri R R. Advances in greenhouse automation and controlled
environment agriculture: A transition to plant factories and urban
5 Conclusions agriculture. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(1): 1–22.
[13] Shamshiri R R. Review of optimum temperature, humidity, and vapour
This study investigated the solid desiccant based drying system pressure deficit for microclimate evaluation and control in greenhouse
for wheat drying application. Thermodynamic expressions are cultivation of tomato: A review. International Agrophysics, 2018; 32(2):
287–302.
presented in detail with the aid of available literature for the
[14] Bennis N, Duplaix J, Enéa G, Haloua M, Youlal H. Greenhouse climate
performance evaluation of desiccant drying systems. Results are modelling and robust control. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,
compared with the conventional drying techniques in order to see 2018; 61(2): 96–107.
the applicability of desiccant drying system. Quick and low [15] Gruber J K. Nonlinear mpc based on a volterra series model for
temperature drying is the main objective of today’s drying greenhouse temperature control using natural ventilation. Control
Engineering Practice, 2011; 19(4): 354–366.
industries that can be used for various applications including the
[16] Ioslovich I, Per Olof G, Raphael L. Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman formalism
wheat grains. In this regard, the desiccant can play a role due to for optimal climate control of greenhouse crop. Automatica, 2009; 45(5):
their water sorption ability by means of vapor pressure deficit. 1227–1231.
The results of this study showed that the desiccant based drying [17] Ismail W I W, Shamshiri R, Ahmad D, Janius R. Adaptability factors for
process helps to provide low-temperature drying by which the open-field tomato production in east and west of Malaysia. in American
Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International
quality of wheat grains will be can be assured. The study reports
Meeting 2015, vol. 3.
that the desiccant drying systems possess relatively higher drying [18] Mashonjowa E, Ronsse F, Milford J R, Pieters J G. Modelling the
rate as compared to conventional drying method. It could be thermal performance of a naturally ventilated greenhouse in zimbabwe
useful not only for domestic drying applications but also for using a dynamic greenhouse climate model. Solar Energy, 2013; 91:
industrial applications. Upon comparison with conventional 381–393.
[19] Shamshiri R, Wan I, Wan I. Performance evaluation of ventilation and
drying methods, it has been found that the proposed drying system
pad-and-fan systems for greenhouse production of tomato in lowland
is not only useful for providing quick and low-temperature drying Malaysia. World Research Journal of Agricultural & Biosystems
but also helps in overall energy saving. The performance index of Engineering, 2012; 1(1): 1–5.
desiccant drying system is found higher than the conventional [20] Shamshiri R, Wan I, Wan I. A review of greenhouse climate control and
system at drying temperatures. It has been concluded that the automation systems in tropical regions. J. Agric. Sci., 2013; 2(3):
176–183.
desiccant based drying systems can provide low-cost and
[21] Shamshiri R, Wan I, Wan I, Desa bin A. Experimental evaluation of air
energy-efficient drying for wheat grains; therefore, this study helps temperature, relative humidity and vapor pressure deficit in tropical
to design sustainable and economical drying systems for lowland plant production environments. Advances in Environmental
developing countries. Biology, 2014; 5–14.
[22] Impron. A greenhouse crop production system for tropical lowland
conditions, 2011; 117.
[References] [23] Shamshiri R R. Adaptive management framework for evaluating and
[1] Watts K C, Bilanski W K, Menzies D R. Simulation of adsorption drying adjusting microclimate parameters in tropical greenhouse crop production
of corn, wheat, barley and oats using bentonite. Canadian Agricultural systems. in Plant Engineering, edited by S. Jurić. Rijeka: InTech. 2017.
Engineering, 1987; 29 (2): 173–178. [24] Kozlowski T T. Insects, and seed collection, storage, testing, and
[2] Sultan M, El-Sharkawy I I, Miyazaki T, Saha B B, Koyama S. An certification. Elsevier Science, 1972; 435p.
overview of solid desiccant dehumidification and air conditioning systems. [25] Erbay Z, Arif H. Advanced exergy analysis of a heat pump drying system
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015; 46: 16–29. used in food drying. Drying Technology, 2013; 31(7): 802–810.
[3] Sultan M, Miyazaki T, Saha B B, Koyama S. Steady-state investigation [26] Clary C D, Wang S J, Petrucci V E. Fixed and incremental levels of
of water vapor adsorption for thermally driven adsorption based microwave power application on drying grapes under vacuum. J. Food
greenhouse air-conditioning system. Renewable Energy, 2016; 86: Sci., 2005; 70(5): 344–349.
785–795. [27] Zhang M, Li C L, Ding X L. Optimization for preserva-tion of selenium
[4] Mahmood M H, Sultan M, Miyazaki T, Koyama S. Desiccant in sweet pepper under low-vacuum dehydration. Drying Tech., 2003;
 228 January, 2019 Int J Agric & Biol Eng Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org Vol. 12 No.1

21(3): 569–579. Tropics: Design and Development, 2011; 363–411.

[28] Zhang M, Li C L, Ding X L. Effects of heating conditions on the thermal [46] Oberoi D P S, Sogi D S. Moisture sorption characteristics of dehydrated
denaturation of white mushroom suitable for dehydration. Drying Techn., watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb) pomace wastes. Journal of Food
2005; 23(5): 1119–1125. Processing and Preservation, 2017; 41(2): 1–6.
[29] Raghavan G S V, Rennie F J, Sunjka P S, Orsat V, Phaphuangwittayakul [47] Sun D W, Woods J L. The selection of sorption isotherm equations for
W, Terdtoon P. Overview of new technologies for drying biological wheat based on the fitting of available data. Journal of Stored Products
materials with emphasis on energy aspects. Brazillian J. of Chem. Eng., Research, 1994; 30(1): 27–43.
2005; 22(2): 195–201. [48] Debabandya M, Srinivasa Rao P. A thin layer drying model of parboiled
[30] Duan X, Zhang M, Mujumdar A S, Wang R. Trends in wheat. Journal of Food Engineering, 2005; 66(4): 513–518.
microwave-assisted freeze drying of foods. Drying Technol., 2010; 28: [49] Whitaker S. Forced convection heat transfer correlations for flow in pipes,
444–453. past flat plates, single. AIChE Journal, 1972; 18(2): 361–371.
[31] Chakraborty R, Mukhopadhay P, Bera M, Suman S. Infra-red-assisted [50] Bhise S R, Kaur A, Manikantan M R. Mositure dependent physical
freeze drying of tiger prawn: parameter optimization and quality properties of wheat grain (PBW 621). International Journal of
assessment. Drying Technol., 2011; 29: 508–519. Engineering Practical Research, 2014; 3(2): 3–8.
[32] Ogura H, Mujumdar A S. Proposal for a novel chemical heat pump dryer. [51] Gastón A L, Abalone R M, Giner S A. Wheat drying kinetics.
Drying Technol., 2000; 18: 1033–1053. diffusivities for sphere and ellipsoid by finite elements. Journal of Food
[33] Sultan M, Miyazaki T, Koyama S, Khan Z M. Performance evaluation of Engineering, 2002; 52(4): 313–322.
hydrophilic organic polymer sorbents for desiccant air-conditioning [52] Fraser B M. Solargrain drying in Canada: A simulation study. Canada.
applications. Adsorption Science & Technology, 2017; 35(7): 1–16. Can. Agric. Eng., 1980; 22: 55–59.
[34] Whitesides Ralph E. Home storage of wheat. All Archived Publications. [53] Ali M, Minaei S, Banakar A, Ghobadian B, Khoshtaghaza M H.
1995; Paper 638. 10 (June). Comparison of energy parameters in various dryers. Energy Conversion
[35] Bruce A. Agricultural engineer digest, https://www.extension.purdue.edu/ and Management, 2014; 87: 711–725.
extmedia/AED/A ED-20.html [Accessed on 2018-02-16] [54] Tsilingiris P T. Thermophysical and transport properties of humid air at
[36] Chramsa-ard W, Sirinuch J, Chatchai S, Sorawit S. Performance temperature range between 0 and 100°C. Energy Conversion and
Evaluation of the desiccant bed solar dryer. Energy Procedia, 2013; 34: Management, 2008; 49(5): 1098–1110.
189–197. [55] Summers Claude M. The conversion of energy. Scientific American,
[37] De Antonellis S, Intini M, Joppolo C M, Romano F. On the control of 1971; 225 (3): 148–160.
desiccant wheels in low temperature drying processes. International [56] Molenda M, Montross M D, McNeill S G, Horabik J. Airflow resistance
Journal of Refrigeration, 2016; 70: 171–182. of seeds at different bulk densities using Ergun Equation. Transactions of
[38] Sultan M, El-Sharkawy I I, Miyazaki T, Saha B B, Koyama S, Maruyama the ASAE, 2005; 48(3): 1137–1145.
T, et al. Insights of water vapor sorption onto polymer based sorbents. [57] Torki-Harchegani M, Ghanbarian D, Pirbalouti A G, Sadeghi M.
Adsorption, 2015; 21(3): 205–215. Dehydration behaviour, mathematical modelling, energy efficiency and
[39] Xia Z Z, Chen C J, Kiplagat J K, Wang R Z, Hu J Q. Adsorption essential oil yield of peppermint leaves undergoing microwave and hot air
equilibrium of water on silica gel. Journal of Chemical & Engineering treatments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016; 58:
Data, 2008; 53(10): 2462–2465. 407–418.
[40] Sultan M, El-Sharkawy I I, Miyazaki T, Saha B B, Koyama S, Maruyama [58] Mortaza A, Mobli H, Rafiee S, Madadlou A. Energy and exergy analyses
T, et al. Water vapor sorption kinetics of polymer based sorbents: Theory of the spray drying process of fish oil microencapsulation. Biosystems
and experiments. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016; 106: 192–202. Engineering, 2012; 111(2): 229–241.
[41] Sun B, Chakraborty A. Thermodynamic frameworks of adsorption [59] Hyungmook K, Lee D-Y. Experimental investigation and introduction of
kinetics modeling: Dynamic water uptakes on silica gel for adsorption a similarity parameter for characterizing the heat and mass transfer in
cooling applications. Energy, 2015; 84: 296–302. polymer desiccant wheels. Energy, 2017; 120: 705–717.
[42] Abasi S, Minaei S, Khoshtaghaza M. Performance of a recirculating [60] Hanif S, Sultan M, Miyazaki T, Koyama S. Steady-state investigation of
dryer equipped with a desiccant wheel. Drying Technology, 2016; 34(8): desiccant drying system for agricultural applications, Evergreen, 2018; 5(1):
863–870. 33–42.
[43] Zhang L Z, Niu J L. Performance comparisons of desiccant wheels for air [61] Kosuke N, Li Y, Jin Z, Masahiro F, Yoshinori A, Atsutoshi A.
dehumidification and enthalpy recovery. Applied Thermal Engineering, Low-temperature desiccant-based food drying system with airflow and
2002; 22 (12): 1347–1367. temperature control. J. Food Eng., 2006; 75: 71–77.
[44] De Stefano A, Joppolo C M, Molinaroli L, Pasini A. Simulation and [62] Bazyma L A, Guskov V P, Basteev A V, Lyashenko A M, Lyakhno V,
energy efficiency analysis of desiccant wheel systems for drying processes. Kutovoy V A. The investigation of low temperature vacuum drying
Energy, 2012; 37(1): 336–345. processes of agricultural materials. Journal of Food Engineering, 2006;
[45] FAO. Grain crop drying, handling and storage. Rural Structures in the 74(3): 410–415.

View publication stats