IGCSE - June-2021-Mark-Scheme-Paper-22
IGCSE - June-2021-Mark-Scheme-Paper-22
IGCSE - June-2021-Mark-Scheme-Paper-22
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2021 series for most Cambridge
IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however, the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Note: All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the passage.
Question 1
This question tests the following writing assessment objectives (25 marks)
Base your article on what you have read in both texts, but be careful to
use your own words. Address both of the bullet points.
Text A
• the internet is blamed for everything without reason
• loneliness and social media are linked but not known in what way
• the internet can make people less lonely, not more
• social media can help people find friends
• you can be yourself on the internet as well as in person
• online friendships can be made across vast distances
• talking online is just as rich as in real life
• befriending apps are available
• some people will find it easier to make friends online
Text B
• research shows how important real friendship is to people / genetically
wired to make a small number of friends
• everyone has different categories of friends
• we don’t have more friends even with the internet
• shared experience in the real life is essential for friends
• deeper connections take more effort than being online
Table A, Writing
3 10–13 • Inconsistent style, expression sometimes awkward but meaning clear. (W1)
• Relies on the sequence of the original text. (W2)
• Vocabulary is simple, limited in range or reliant on the original text. (W3)
• Some awareness of an appropriate register for audience and purpose. (W4)
• Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar, sometimes serious.
(W5)
0 0 • No creditable content.
Table B, Reading
6 13–15 • Successfully evaluates ideas and opinions, both explicit and implicit. (R1, R2,
R3)
• Assimilates ideas from the text to give a developed, sophisticated response.
(R3, R5)
5 10–12 • Some successful evaluation of ideas and opinions, both explicit and implicit.
(R1, R2, R3)
• A thorough response, supported by a detailed selection of relevant ideas from
the text. (R3, R5)
4 7–9 • Begins to evaluate mainly explicit ideas and opinions. (R1, R2, R3)
• An appropriate response that includes relevant ideas from the text. (R3, R5)
3 5–6 • Selects and comments on explicit ideas and opinions. (R1, R2, R3)
• Makes a general response including a few relevant ideas from the text. (R3,
R5)
1 1–2 • Very limited response with minimal relation to the text. (R1, R2, R3, R5)
0 0 • No creditable content.
Section B: Composition
Questions 2, 3, 4, 5
2 EITHER 40
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table B to
give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
3 OR 40
Write a description with the title, ‘The view from the other side’.
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table B to
give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
4 OR 40
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table B to
give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
5 OR 40
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table B to
give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
6 14–16 General
Many well-defined and developed ideas The plot is well-defined and strongly
and images create a convincing overall developed with features of fiction writing
picture with varieties of focus. such as description, characterisation
and effective climax, and convincing
details.
5 11–13 General
Frequent, well-chosen images and The plot is defined and developed with
details give a mostly convincing picture. features of fiction writing such as
description, characterisation, climax and
details.
4 8–10 General
A selection of relevant ideas, images The plot is relevant and cohesive, with
and details, even where there is a some features such as characterisation
tendency to write in a narrative style. and setting of scene.
3 5–7 General
The task is addressed with a series of The plot is straightforward, with limited
relevant but straightforward details, use of the features of narrative writing.
which may be more typical of a
narrative.
2 3–4 General
The recording of some relevant events The plot is a simple narrative that may
with limited detail. consist of events that are only partially
linked and/or which are presented with
partial clarity.
1 1–2 General
The description is unclear and lacks The plot and/or narrative lacks
detail. coherence.
0 0 No creditable content.
6 21–24 • Precise, well-chosen vocabulary and varied sentence structures, chosen for
effect. (W3)
• Consistent well-chosen register suitable for the context. (W4)
• Spelling, punctuation and grammar almost always accurate. (W5)
5 17–20 • Mostly precise vocabulary and a range of sentence structures mostly used for
effect. (W3)
• Mostly consistent appropriate register suitable for the context. (W4)
• Spelling, punctuation and grammar mostly accurate, with occasional minor
errors. (W5)
4 13–16 • Some precise vocabulary and a range of sentence structures sometimes used
for effect. (W3)
• Some appropriate register for the context. (W4)
• Spelling, punctuation and grammar generally accurate, but with some errors.
(W5)
0 0 • No creditable content.