History 0410-2024-2026-Syllabus
History 0410-2024-2026-Syllabus
History 0410-2024-2026-Syllabus
Syllabus overview
Content overview
All candidates study Core content in either Option A or Option B.
Either:
Option A
The nineteenth century: the development of modern nation states, 1848–1914
The content focuses on the following key questions:
• Were the revolutions of 1848 important?
• How was Italy unified?
• How was Germany unified?
• Why was there a civil war in the United States and what were its results?
• Why, and with what effects, did nations gain and expand their overseas empires in the nineteenth century?
• What caused the First World War?
or:
Option B
The twentieth century: international relations since 1919
The content focuses on the following key questions:
• Was the Treaty of Versailles fair?
• To what extent was the League of Nations a success?
• How far was Hitler’s foreign policy to blame for the outbreak of war in Europe in 1939?
• Who was to blame for the Cold War?
• How effectively did the United States contain the spread of communism?
• How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948–c.1989?
In addition, all candidates must also study at least one of the following depth studies:
A The First World War, 1914–18
B Germany, 1918–45
C Russia, 1905–41
D The United States, 1919–41
E The Second World War in Europe and the Asia–Pacific, 1939–c.1945
Assessment overview
All candidates take three components. All candidates take Paper 1 and Paper 2 and either Component 3 or
Paper 4. Candidates will be eligible for grades A* to G.
Externally assessed
Assessment objectives
The assessment objectives (AOs) are:
AO1
An ability to recall, select, organise and deploy knowledge of the syllabus content.
AO2
An ability to construct historical explanations using an understanding of:
• cause and consequence, change and continuity, similarity and difference
• the motives, emotions, intentions and beliefs of people in the past.
AO3
An ability to understand, interpret, evaluate and use a range of sources as evidence, in their historical context.
AO1 30
AO2 45
AO3 25
Total 100
AO1 33 20 38
AO2 67 0 62
AO3 0 80 0
Focus points
• What were the motives and aims of the Big Three at Versailles?
• Why did the victors not get everything they wanted?
• What was the impact of the Treaty on Germany up to the end of 1923?
• Could the Treaty be justified at the time?
Specified content
• The roles of Wilson, Clemenceau and Lloyd George in the peacemaking process
• The terms of the Treaty
• Social, economic and political impact of the Treaty in Germany to the end of 1923
• Contemporary opinions about the Treaty
Focus points
• How far did weaknesses in the League’s organisation and membership make failure inevitable?
• How successful were the League’s attempts at peacekeeping in the 1920s?
• How important was the League’s humanitarian work?
• How far did the Depression make the work of the League more difficult in the 1930s?
Specified content
• The structure, aims and membership of the League
• Successes and failures in peacekeeping during the 1920s:
– Vilna 1920
– Aaland Islands 1920–21
– Corfu 1923
– Bulgaria 1925
• The League’s humanitarian work:
– refugees
– health
– working conditions
– slavery
• The League in the 1930s:
– causes, events and consequences of the Manchurian crisis and of the Abyssinian crisis
3 How far was Hitler’s foreign policy to blame for the outbreak of war in Europe in 1939?
Focus points
• What were the long-term consequences of the Treaty of Versailles?
• What were the consequences of the failures of the League of Nations in the 1930s?
• Was the policy of appeasement justified?
• How important was the Nazi–Soviet Pact?
• Why did Britain and France declare war on Germany in September 1939?
Specified content
• Hitler’s foreign policy aims
• Rearmament
• The Saar
• Remilitarisation of the Rhineland
• The Rome–Berlin Axis and the Anti-Comintern Pact
• German and Italian involvement in the Spanish Civil War
• Anschluss with Austria
• The crisis over Czechoslovakia and the Munich Agreement
• The Polish crisis and the outbreak of war
Focus points
• Why did the US–Soviet alliance begin to break down in 1945?
• How had the USSR gained control of Eastern Europe by 1948?
• How did the United States react to Soviet expansionism?
• What were the consequences of the Berlin Blockade?
• Who was more to blame for starting the Cold War: the United States or the USSR?
Specified content
• The origins of the Cold War:
– the 1945 summit conferences and the breakdown of the US–Soviet alliance in 1945–46
– Soviet expansion into Eastern Europe to 1948, and American reactions to it
– the occupation of Germany and the Berlin Blockade
– NATO and the Warsaw Pact
5 How effectively did the United States contain the spread of communism?
Focus points
This key question will be explored through case studies of the following:
• The United States and events in Korea, 1950–53
• The United States and events in Cuba, 1959–62
• American involvement in Vietnam, 1955–75
Specified content
• Case studies of:
– American reactions to North Korea’s invasion of South Korea, the involvement of the UN, the course
of the war to 1953
– American reactions to the Cuban Revolution, including the Missile Crisis and its aftermath
– American involvement in the Vietnam War, including reasons for involvement, tactics and strategy,
reasons for withdrawal
6 How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe, 1948–c.1989?
Focus points
• Why was there opposition to Soviet control in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968, and how did
the USSR react to this opposition?
• How similar were events in Hungary in 1956 and in Czechoslovakia in 1968?
• Why was the Berlin Wall built in 1961?
• What was the significance of Solidarity in Poland for the decline of Soviet influence in Eastern Europe?
• How far was Gorbachev personally responsible for the collapse of Soviet control over Eastern Europe?
Specified content
• Soviet power in Eastern Europe:
– resistance to Soviet power in Hungary (1956) and Czechoslovakia (1968)
– the Berlin Wall
– Solidarity in Poland
– Gorbachev and the collapse of Soviet control over Eastern Europe
Depth studies
Candidates must study at least one of the following Depth studies:
A The First World War, 1914–18
B Germany, 1918–45
C Russia, 1905–41
D The United States, 1919–41
E The Second World War in Europe and the Asia–Pacific, 1939–c.1945
Focus points
• Why did the Schlieffen Plan fail?
• Why did a defensive war emerge by the end of 1914?
• What was living and fighting in the trenches like?
• How important were new methods of warfare?
• What was the significance of the Battles of Verdun and the Somme?
Focus points
• How important was the role of troops from the British Empire on the Western Front?
• What was the contribution of Indian and South African troops in Africa?
• What was the contribution of Japan to the Allied victory?
• How important was the Arab Revolt?
Focus points
• Who won the war at sea?
• Why did the Gallipoli Campaign of 1915 fail?
• How important was the Eastern Front?
• What was the impact of war on civilian populations?
Focus points
• What was the importance of America’s entry into the war?
• Why was the German offensive of 1918 unsuccessful?
• Why did revolution break out in Germany in October 1918?
• Why was the Armistice signed?
Specified content
• The Schlieffen Plan and how it worked in practice:
– the German advance through Belgium and the impact of the British Expeditionary Force
– the effect on the western front of Russian mobilisation
• The battles of Mons and the Marne, the race to the sea and the First Battle of Ypres:
– the reaction to the stalemate: trenches and the development of a war of attrition
• The nature and problems of trench warfare
• The use and impact of developments such as tanks, machine guns, aircraft and gas
• The impact of the battles of Verdun and the Somme:
– the leadership and tactics of Haig at the Battle of the Somme
• The role and experiences of British Empire troops on the Western Front:
– Case study: Indian troops
– Case study: Canadian troops
• The war in Africa:
– Case study: German East Africa
– Case study: South West Africa
• Contribution of Japan in Asia:
– the siege of Tsingtao
– naval assistance in securing the sea lanes
• The Arab Revolt
• The war at sea:
– the Battle of Jutland and its consequences
– the use of convoys and submarines and the U-boat campaign
• The reasons for, and results of, the Gallipoli campaign
• Events on the Eastern Front and the defeat of Russia
• The impact of war on civilian populations
• The German offensive of 1918 and the Allied advance:
– the impact of American entry into the war
• Conditions in Germany towards the end of the war:
– the Kiel Mutiny and German Revolution
– the abdication of the Kaiser
• The Armistice
Focus points
• How did Germany emerge from defeat at the end of the First World War?
• What was the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on the Republic?
• To what extent did the Republic recover after 1923?
• What were the achievements of the Weimar period?
Focus points
• What did the Nazi Party stand for in the 1920s?
• Why did the Nazis have little success before 1930?
• Why was Hitler able to become Chancellor by 1933?
• How did Hitler consolidate his power in 1933–34?
Specified content
• The Revolution of 1918 and the establishment of the Republic
• The Versailles Settlement and German reactions to it
• The Weimar Constitution, the main political divisions, the role of the army
• Political disorder, 1919–23:
– threats from the left and the right
– economic crises and hyper-inflation
– the occupation of the Ruhr
• The Stresemann era:
– economic achievements
– foreign policy achievements
• Cultural achievements of the Weimar period
• The early years of the Nazi Party:
– Nazi ideas and methods
– the Munich Putsch
– the roles of Hitler and other Nazi leaders
• The impact of the Depression on Germany:
– political, economic and social crisis of 1930–33
– reasons for the Nazis’ rise to power
– Hitler takes power
– the Reichstag Fire and the election of 1933
• Nazi rule in Germany:
– the Enabling Act
– the Night of the Long Knives
– the death of Hindenburg
– the removal of opposition
– methods of control and repression
– use of culture and the mass media
• Economic policy including rearmament
• Different experiences of Nazi rule:
– women and young people
– anti-Semitism
– persecution of minorities
– opposition to Nazi rule
• Impact of the Second World War on Germany:
– the conversion to a war economy
– the Final Solution
Focus points
• How well did the Tsarist regime deal with the difficulties of ruling Russia up to 1914?
• How did the Tsar survive the 1905 Revolution?
• How far was the Tsar weakened by the First World War?
• Why was the revolution of March 1917 successful?
2 How did the Bolsheviks gain power, and how did they consolidate their rule?
Focus points
• How effectively did the Provisional Government rule Russia in 1917?
• Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in November 1917?
• Why did the Bolsheviks win the Civil War?
• How far was the New Economic Policy a success?
Focus points
• Why did Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerge as Lenin’s successor?
• Why did Stalin launch the Purges?
• What methods did Stalin use to control the Soviet Union?
• How complete was Stalin’s control over the Soviet Union by 1941?
Focus points
• Why did Stalin introduce the Five-Year Plans?
• Why did Stalin introduce collectivisation?
• How successful were Stalin’s economic changes?
• How were the Soviet people affected by these changes?
Specified content
• The main features of Tsarist rule and Russian society before the First World War:
– the 1905 Revolution and its aftermath
– attempts at reform
• The First World War and its impact on the Russian people
• The March Revolution of 1917
• The Provisional Government and the Soviets, the growing power of revolutionary groups
• Reasons for the failure of the Provisional Government
• The Bolshevik seizure of power, the role of Lenin
• The main features of Bolshevik rule, the Civil War and War Communism, and reasons for the Bolshevik
victory
• The Kronstadt Rising and the establishment of the New Economic Policy
• Lenin’s death and the struggle for power
• Reasons for Stalin’s emergence as leader by 1928
• Stalin’s dictatorship:
– use of terror
– the Purges
– propaganda and official culture
• Stalin’s economic policies and their impact:
– the modernisation of Soviet industry
– the Five-Year Plans
– collectivisation in agriculture
• Life in the Soviet Union:
– the differing experiences of social groups
– ethnic minorities and women
Focus points
• On what factors was the economic boom based?
• Why did some industries prosper while others did not?
• Why did agriculture not share in the prosperity?
• Did all Americans benefit from the boom?
Focus points
• What were the ‘Roaring Twenties’?
• How widespread was intolerance in US society?
• Why was Prohibition introduced, and then later repealed?
• How far did the roles of women change during the 1920s?
3 What were the causes and consequences of the Wall Street Crash?
Focus points
• How far was speculation responsible for the Wall Street Crash?
• What impact did the Crash have on the economy?
• What were the social consequences of the Crash?
• Why did Roosevelt win the election of 1932?
Focus points
• What was the New Deal as introduced in 1933?
• How far did the character of the New Deal change after 1933?
• Why did the New Deal encounter opposition?
• Why did unemployment persist despite the New Deal?
• Did the fact that the New Deal did not solve unemployment mean that it was a failure?
Specified content
• The expansion of the US economy during the 1920s:
– government policies
– mass production in industries for cars and other consumer goods
– the fortunes of older industries
– the development of credit and hire purchase
– the decline of agriculture
• Weaknesses in the economy by the late 1920s
• Society in the 1920s:
– the ‘Roaring Twenties’
– film and other media
– Prohibition and gangsterism
– restrictions on immigration, the ‘Red Scare’, religious intolerance
– discrimination against Black Americans
– the Ku Klux Klan
– the changing roles of women
• The Wall Street Crash and its financial, economic and social effects
• The reaction of President Hoover to the Crash
• The presidential election of 1932; Hoover’s and Roosevelt’s programmes
• Roosevelt’s inauguration and the ‘Hundred Days’
• The New Deal legislation, the ‘alphabet agencies’ and their work, and the economic and social changes
they caused
• Opposition to the New Deal:
– the Republicans
– the rich
– business interests
– the Supreme Court
– radical critics like Huey Long
• The strengths and weaknesses of the New Deal programme in dealing with unemployment and the
Depression
Depth study E: The Second World War in Europe and the Asia–Pacific,
1939–c.1945
1 How did the Second World War in Europe develop?
Focus points
• To what extent had Nazi Germany gained control of Europe in 1940?
• Why was Germany unable to conquer Britain?
• Why did Hitler invade the Soviet Union in 1941?
• Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point?
Focus points
• How did US–Japanese relationships deteriorate?
• How successful was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor?
• Why were the Japanese successful in the initial stages of the war?
• Why was the Battle of Midway a turning point?
3 What was the impact of war on civilian populations in Europe and the Asia–Pacific?
Focus points
• What was the impact on civilians of the bombing of Britain (1940–41) and Germany (1943–45)?
• How did Japanese control impact on peoples’ lives?
• What were the experiences of civilian populations in Nazi-occupied Europe?
• How effective were resistance movements in Europe and the Asia–Pacific?
4 How did the Allies achieve victory over the Axis powers?
Focus points
• What was the importance of the Allied advance through Italy?
• Why was Nazi Germany on the point of collapse by April 1945?
• Why were the Allies able to achieve victory over Japan?
• How did the Allies consolidate their victories in Germany and Japan?
Specified content
• Extent of German conquest of Europe 1940:
– invasion of and surrender of France; Vichy government in France
– Dunkirk
– German plans to invade Britain (Operation Sea Lion)
– the Battle of Britain and its consequences
• Operation Barbarossa and initial Nazi successes
• German defeat at Stalingrad and its impact
• The reasons for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and its consequences
• Reasons for initial Japanese military successes in Southeast Asia by early 1942:
– Case study: Malaya and Singapore
• The Battle of Midway and its impact
• The impact of bombing on peoples’ lives and morale in Europe:
– the Blitz
– Allied bombing of German cities
• The impact of Japanese control on people’s lives:
– Case study: Malaya and Singapore
• The impact of Nazi control in occupied Europe:
– Case study: Poland, including circumstances leading to the Holocaust and its impact
• The methods and effectiveness of resistance movements in Malaya and in France
• The Allied invasion of Sicily and victory over German forces in Italy
• The collapse and surrender of Nazi Germany in 1945:
– the D-Day landings and the advance to Germany
– the Russian advance from the East
• The reasons for the defeat of Japan:
– the battles of Guadalcanal and Okinawa
– the US strategy of island-hopping
– the bombing of Japan
– the decision to use the atomic bomb and its consequences
• Consolidation of victory:
– the Allied occupations and control of Germany and Japan
– the war crimes trials in Nuremberg and Tokyo
Candidates answer two questions from Section A and one question from Section B.
Section A contains eight questions. Candidates answer any two questions. Four questions will be set from
the nineteenth century Core content in Option A and four questions will be set from the twentieth century Core
content in Option B. In each option, two questions will be set from key questions 1–3 and two questions will be
set from key questions 4–6.
Section B contains two questions on each of the five depth studies. Candidates answer one question.
All questions in Section A and Section B are in the form of structured essays, split into three parts: (a), (b) and (c).
Candidates answer one question on either the prescribed topic from the Core content in Option A or the
prescribed topic from the Core content in Option B. Each question has five parts.
Each question includes a range of source material relating to the prescribed topic, with a maximum of seven
sources per question. The five question parts are based on the source material provided.
Component 3 – Coursework
40 marks
The component is set and assessed internally by the centre, and externally moderated by Cambridge.
Coursework is an opportunity for teachers to introduce topics that are particularly relevant or of interest to their
students. Coursework encourages independent learning. The skills developed through planning and delivering
coursework support progression to higher-level studies.
Candidates produce one piece of extended writing, up to 2000 words in length, based on content taken from
any of the depth studies. Centres can devise a depth study of their own, if they want to cover the history of
countries not included in the current depth studies. The coursework should be based on a single question and
should not be broken down into sub-questions. The coursework must be focused on the issue of significance
and must target assessment objectives AO1 and AO2.
See also the section Guidance for centres on coursework and the Coursework Handbook.
The Coursework Handbook for this syllabus may be found on our School Support Hub:
www.cambridgeinternational.org/support
This paper contains two questions on each of the five depth studies. Candidates answer one question.
All questions are in the form of structured essays, split into two parts: (a) and (b).
Each part (a) question tests assessment objective AO1. Each part (b) question tests assessment objective AO2.
Answers to part (a) should give an account that takes a logical approach in describing the main characteristics
and features of the development or event specified in the question.
Answers to part (b) should discuss the importance of the person/organisation/development/event specified in
the question and how this importance can be assessed in different ways.
If centres are devising their own studies they should be within the date range covered by the syllabus and
must not be based on the Core content in the syllabus. There must be sufficient debate within the topic and
resources available.
The title of the essay should be evaluative, as shown in these example questions:
• How far was the New Deal a turning point in US history to 1941?
• ‘The work of Bletchley Park was very significant during the Second World War.’ Discuss.
• How far were the Camp David meetings a turning point for the Middle East?
• Assess the significance of the Parihaka community in New Zealand in the years 1866–81.
• How far was the Atlanta Compromise of 1895 a turning point for Black Americans?
• How significant was Juan Perón for Argentina?
• Assess the significance of the Seneca Falls Convention in the US by 1920.
Supervising coursework
A general discussion on the progress of coursework is a natural part of the teacher–candidate relationship, as
it is for other parts of the course. If plans and first drafts are completed under teacher supervision, you can be
sure of the authenticity of the final coursework. Candidates can draft and redraft work, but you should only give
brief summative comments on progress during this drafting phase.
Coursework must be a candidate’s own, unaided work. Unless there is subject-specific guidance that says
otherwise, you can support candidates by reviewing their work before it is handed in for final assessment.
You can do this orally or through written feedback. Your advice should be kept at a general level so that the
candidate leads the discussion and makes the suggestions for any amendments. You must not give detailed
advice to individual candidates or groups of candidates on how their work can be improved to meet the
assessment criteria. You should not correct or edit draft coursework.
For further information about supervising coursework, see the Cambridge Handbook for the relevant year of
assessment at www.cambridgeinternational.org/eoguide
A candidate taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as their own is an example of
plagiarism. It is your responsibility as a teacher to prevent plagiarism from happening and to detect it if it does
happen. For more information, search for ‘Preventing plagiarism – guidance for teachers’ on our website at
www.cambridgeinternational.org/teachingandassessment
For work submitted using our eSubmission portal, you must make a collective declaration of authenticity for the
work of all candidates that you submit.
The marker should look at the work as a whole and then make a judgement about which level is the best
fit. In practice, work does not always match one level precisely and candidates do not have to meet all the
requirements of a level before an answer can be placed in that level. A judgement may need to be made
between two or more levels. In making this judgement, the question to be asked about an answer is ‘does it
match, e.g. Level 4 better than it matches Level 3?’
Once a best-fit level has been identified, use the following guidance to decide on a specific mark:
• If the candidate’s work convincingly meets the level description, award the highest mark.
• If the candidate’s work adequately meets the level description, award the most appropriate mark in the
middle of the range (where middle marks are available).
• If the candidate’s work just meets the level description, award the lowest mark.
Level 5 36–40 • Candidates demonstrate and select and effectively deploy relevant and
accurate contextual knowledge.
• Candidates select a wide range of relevant information which is well
organised and deployed effectively.
• Candidates demonstrate excellent understanding of the significance of
the key features, reasons, results or changes of societies, events, beliefs,
people and situations studied with good awareness of the importance of
inter-relationships and the broad context.
• Candidates consistently produce relevant, effective, convincing and well-
supported arguments and judgements.
• Candidates produce conclusions that are entirely consistent with the rest
of the answer and are effectively supported.
Level 4 27–35 • Candidates demonstrate and select and effectively deploy mostly
relevant and accurate contextual knowledge.
• Candidates select a range of relevant information which is generally well
organised and effectively deployed.
• Candidates demonstrate a good understanding of the significance
of the key features, reasons, results or changes of societies, events,
beliefs, people and situations studied with good awareness of the broad
context.
• Candidates demonstrate some understanding of inter-relationships in the
period studied.
• In several places, candidates produce relevant, effective, convincing and
well-supported arguments and judgements.
• Candidates produce conclusions that are argued and supported.
The database will then take you to the information you need, including dates and methods of submission of
candidates’ marks and work, as well as any forms you may need to complete.
You should follow the instructions for Coursework 0470/03 on the samples database at
www.cambridgeinternational.org/samples about how to submit candidates’ work and record candidates’
marks.
For specific syllabuses and components, centres need to submit marks and work using our eSubmission
portal (see the samples database for instructions for each coursework component). Further
information is available in the Administrative guide: Preparing and submitting work using eSubmission
at www.cambridgeinternational.org/eoguide
You should record marks on the relevant forms which you should download each year from the samples
database at www.cambridgeinternational.org/samples. Follow the instructions on the forms to complete
them. The marks on these forms must be identical to the marks you submit to Cambridge International.
Internal moderation
If more than one teacher in your centre is marking internal assessments, you must make arrangements
to moderate or standardise your teachers’ marking so that all candidates are assessed to a common
standard. (If only one teacher is marking internal assessments, no internal moderation is necessary.)
You can find further information on the process of internal moderation on the samples database at
www.cambridgeinternational.org/samples
You should record the internally moderated marks for all candidates on the relevant forms from the samples
database and submit these marks to Cambridge International according to the instructions set out in the
Cambridge Handbook for the relevant year of assessment.
External moderation
Cambridge International will externally moderate all internally assessed components.
The sample you submit to Cambridge International should include examples of the marking of each teacher.
The samples database at www.cambridgeinternational.org/samples explains how the sample will be
selected.
External moderators will produce a short report for each centre with feedback on your marking and
administration of the assessment.
Command words
Command words and their meanings help candidates know what is expected from them in the exams. The
table below includes command words used in the assessment for this syllabus. The use of the command word
will relate to the subject context.
Describe state the points of a topic / give characteristics and main features
Explain set out purposes or reasons / make the relationships between things clear / say why
and/or how and support with relevant evidence
Phrases such as ‘How far do you agree…?’ and ‘Write an account…’ may also be seen in the assessment for
this syllabus.
This section is an overview of other information you need to know about this syllabus. It will help to share the
administrative information with your exams officer so they know when you will need their support. Find more
information about our administrative processes at www.cambridgeinternational.org/eoguide
You can view the timetable for your administrative zone at www.cambridgeinternational.org/timetables
You can enter candidates in the June and November exam series. If your school is in India, you can also enter
your candidates in the March exam series.
Check you are using the syllabus for the year the candidate is taking the exam.
Private candidates can enter for this syllabus. Some components are not available to private candidates. For
more information, please refer to the Cambridge Guide to Making Entries.
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge IGCSE (9–1) and Cambridge O Level syllabuses are at the same level.
Making entries
Exams officers are responsible for submitting entries to Cambridge International. We encourage them to work
closely with you to make sure they enter the right number of candidates for the right combination of syllabus
components. Entry option codes and instructions for submitting entries are in the Cambridge Guide to Making
Entries. Your exams officer has a copy of this guide.
Exam administration
To keep our exams secure, we produce question papers for different areas of the world, known as
administrative zones. We allocate all Cambridge schools to one administrative zone determined by their
location. Each zone has a specific timetable. Some of our syllabuses offer candidates different assessment
options. An entry option code is used to identify the components the candidate will take relevant to the
administrative zone and the available assessment options.
Marks achieved in Component 3 Coursework can be carried forward to future series, subject to the
requirements set out in the Cambridge Handbook.
Candidates cannot resubmit, in whole or in part, coursework from a previous series. To confirm what entry
options are available to carry forward marks for this syllabus, refer to the Cambridge Guide to Making Entries
for the relevant series. Regulations for carrying forward internally assessed marks can be found in the
Cambridge Handbook for the relevant year at www.cambridgeinternational.org/eoguide
Language
This syllabus and the related assessment materials are available in English only.
Access arrangements
Access arrangements (including modified papers) are the principal way in which Cambridge International
complies with our duty, as guided by the UK Equality Act (2010), to make ‘reasonable adjustments’ for
candidates with special educational needs (SEN), disability, illness or injury. Where a candidate would otherwise
be at a substantial disadvantage in comparison to a candidate with no SEN, disability, illness or injury, we
may be able to agree pre-examination access arrangements. These arrangements help a candidate by
minimising accessibility barriers and maximising their opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge, skills and
understanding in an assessment.
Important:
• Requested access arrangements should be based on evidence of the candidate’s barrier to assessment
and should also reflect their normal way of working at school; this is in line with the Cambridge Handbook
www.cambridgeinternational.org/eoguide
• For Cambridge International to approve an access arrangement, we will need to agree that it constitutes
a reasonable adjustment, involves reasonable cost and timeframe and does not affect the security and
integrity of the assessment.
• Availability of access arrangements should be checked by centres at the start of the course. Details of our
standard access arrangements and modified question papers are available in the Cambridge Handbook
www.cambridgeinternational.org/eoguide
• Please contact us at the start of the course to find out if we are able to approve an arrangement that is not
included in the list of standard access arrangements.
• Candidates who cannot access parts of the assessment may be able to receive an award based on the
parts they have completed.
A* is the highest and G is the lowest. ‘Ungraded’ means that the candidate’s performance did not meet the
standard required for grade G. ‘Ungraded’ is reported on the statement of results but not on the certificate.
In specific circumstances your candidates may see one of the following letters on their statement of results:
• Q (PENDING)
• X (NO RESULT).
These letters do not appear on the certificate.
On the statement of results and certificates, Cambridge IGCSE is shown as INTERNATIONAL GENERAL
CERTIFICATE OF SECONDARY EDUCATION (IGCSE).
Grade descriptions
Grade descriptions are provided to give an indication of the standards of achievement candidates awarded
particular grades are likely to show. Weakness in one aspect of the examination may be balanced by a better
performance in some other aspect.
Grade descriptions for Cambridge IGCSE History will be published after the first assessment of the syllabus in
2024. Find more information at www.cambridgeinternational.org/igcse
You must read the whole syllabus before planning your teaching programme.
Changes to syllabus content • Core content Option A key question 5 has been changed to
reduce the focus on European empires and include content on US
imperialism.
• In Core content Option A key question 6, one focus point and the
specified content have been clarified.
• Core content Option B key question 1 has been changed to focus
on the Treaty of Versailles.
• Core content Option B key questions 2 and 3 have been changed
to improve the focus on the work of the League of Nations and its
consequences.
• Minor clarifications have been made to other key questions in Core
content Options A and B.
• Depth study A key questions 1 and 2 have been changed to give
greater focus on the non-European dimension of the conflict. One
focus point in key question 3 has been amended. More detail has
been provided in the specified content.
• One new depth study has been introduced: Depth study E: The
Second World War in Europe and the Asia–Pacific, 1939–c.1945.
• Three depth studies have been removed: China, c.1930–c.1990;
South Africa, c.1940–c.1994; Israelis and Palestinians since 1945.
Centres wishing to continue studying these topic areas may use
them as centre-devised coursework topics.
• Minor clarifications have been made to the remaining depth studies.
• Some prescribed topics for Paper 2 have been changed. Please
see section 4 of this syllabus for the prescribed topics for 2024,
2025 and 2026.
Changes to assessment • The Details of the assessment for Paper 1 have been updated.
(including changes to In each Core content option, two questions will be set from key
specimen papers) questions 1–3 and two questions will be set from key questions
4–6.
• The mark scheme levels for Paper 1 have been clarified.
• Paper 2 has been reduced to 40 marks and to 1 hour 45 minutes in
duration.
– The number of sources has been reduced for each Core
content option.
– The number of questions has been reduced. Each Core content
option now has one question of five parts not six individual
questions.
continued
Changes to assessment • The questions on Paper 4 are now structured in two parts, (a) and (b).
(including changes to Part (a) tests assessment objective AO1 and part (b) tests
specimen papers) (continued) assessment objective AO2.
• The weightings of Paper 2, Component 3 and Paper 4 have
changed.
• The specimen assessment materials, including mark schemes, for
papers 1, 2 and 4 have been updated.
Other changes An updated Coursework Handbook for this syllabus will be published on
the School Support Hub www.cambridgeinternational.org/support
in July 2022.
In addition to reading the syllabus, you should refer to the updated specimen assessment materials. The
specimen papers will help your students become familiar with exam requirements and command words in
questions. The specimen mark schemes show how students should answer questions to meet the assessment
objectives.
Any textbooks endorsed to support the syllabus for examination from 2024 are suitable for use
with this syllabus.
We are committed to making our documents accessible in accordance with the WCAG 2.1 Standard. We’re always looking to improve
the accessibility of our documents. If you find any problems or you think we’re not meeting accessibility requirements, contact us at
info@cambridgeinternational.org with the subject heading: Digital accessibility. If you need this document in a different format, contact
us and supply your name, email address and requirements and we will respond within 15 working days.
Cambridge Assessment International Education, The Triangle Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8EA, United Kingdom
t : +44 (0)1223 553554 email : info@cambridgeinternational.org www.cambridgeinternational.org