Types MSE
Types MSE
Types MSE
1
Types of Manufacturing Systems
2
Types of Operations Performed
Processing operations on work units versus assembly operations to combine individual parts into
assembled entities
Type(s) of materials processed
Size and weight of work units
Part geometry
For machined parts, rotational vs. non-rotational
Part or product complexity
For assembled products, number of components per product
For individual parts, number of distinct operations to complete processing
3
Number of Workstations
Convenient measure of the size of the system
Let n = number of workstations
Individual workstations can be identified by subscript i, where i = 1, 2,...,n
Affects performance factors such as workload capacity, production rate, and reliability
As n increases, this usually means greater workload capacity and higher production rate
There must be a synergistic effect that derives from n multiple stations working together vs. n
single stations
Splitting work content among work stations
Complex system- Material handling
System layout
Applies mainly to multi-station systems
Fixed routing vs. variable routing
In systems with fixed routing, workstations are usually arranged linearly
In systems with variable routing, a variety of layouts are possible
System layout is an important factor in determining the most appropriate type of material
handling system
4
Level of Automation
5
Part or Product Variety: Flexibility
The degree to which the system is capable of dealing with variations in the parts or products it without
interruptions in production for changeovers between models
Starting material
Size and weight of the work unit
part geometry
part or product complexity
optional features in an assembled product.
flexible manufacturing systems, or flexible assembly systems
adapt to new styles before the previous one obsolete
6
Enablers of Flexibility
7
Classification of Manufacturing Systems
8
Classification of Single-Station Manufacturing Cells
9
Single-Station Manufacturing Cells
Most common manufacturing system in industry
Operation is independent of other stations
Perform either processing or assembly operations
Can be designed for:
Single model production- all parts or products are identical (sufficient demand/fixed automation)
Batch production- different parts or products are produced by the system, but they are produced in
batches because changeovers are required (hard product variety)
Mixed model production- different parts or products are produced by the system, but the system can
handle the differences without the need for time-consuming changes in setup (soft product variety)
10
Single-Station Manned Cell
“One worker tending one production machine (most common model)”
Most widely used production method, especially in job shop and batch production
Reasons for popularity:
Shortest time to implement
Requires least capital investment
Easiest to install and operate
Typically, the lowest unit cost for low production
Most flexible for product or part changeovers
Worker operating a standard machine tool
Worker loads & unloads parts, operates machine
Machine is manually operated
Worker operating semi-automatic machine
Worker loads & unloads parts, starts semi-automatic work cycle
Worker attention not required continuously during entire work cycle
Worker using hand tools or portable power tools at one location
Machine Cluster
11
Variations of Single-Station Manned Cell
A worker using hand tools
screw driver and wrench in mechanical assembly
portable powered tools (e.g., powered handheld drill, soldering iron, or arc welding gun
Manual inspection
Two (or more) workers required to operate machine
Two workers required to manipulate heavy forging at forge press
Welder and fitter in arc welding work cell
Multiple workers combining their efforts to assemble one large piece of machinery
One principal production machine plus support equipment
Drying equipment for a manually operated injection molding machine
Trimming shears at impression-die forge hammer to trim flash from forged part
A grinder used at an injection molding machine
12
Single-Station Automated Cell
Fully automated production machine capable of operating unattended for
longer than one work cycle
Worker not required except for periodic attention
Reasons why it is important:
Labor cost is reduced
Easiest and least expensive automated system to implement
Production rates usually higher than manned cell
First step in implementing an integrated multi-station automated system
Supporting equipment
A robot loading and unloading an automated production machine
CNC lathe with chip conveyor
Drying equipment in a fully automated injection-molding machine
13
Enablers for Unattended Cell Operation-Identical Parts
14
Enablers for Unattended Cell Operation-different Parts
15
Parts Storage Subsystem and Automatic Parts Transfer
Given a capacity = np parts in the storage subsystem, the cell can theoretically operate for a time
UT = npTc
where UT = unattended time of operation
In reality, unattended time will be less than UT because the worker needs time to unload finished
parts and load raw workparts into the storage subsystem
Typical objectives in defining the desired parts storage capacity np:
Make npTc= a fixed time interval that allows one worker to tend multiple machines
Make npTc= time between scheduled tool changes
Make npTc = one complete shift
Make npTc = one overnight (“lights-out operation”)
The time of unattended operation increases directly with storage capacity, so there is an advantage to
designing the storage subsystem with sufficient capacity to satisfy the plant’s operational objectives.
16
Storage Capacity of One Part
•If Ts > Tm, the machine experiences forced idle time during
each work cycle, and this is undesirable.
CNC Machining Center with Automatic Pallet Changer
•If Ts < Tm machine utilization is high
17
Storage Capacities Greater Than One
18
Storage Capacities Greater Than One
19
Parts Storage other Than machining
•Sheet metal stamping
20
CNC Machining Centers and Related Machine Tools
single-station automated cells with CNC tools
machining centers,
turning centers,
mill-turn centers,
multitasking machines.
To reduce the number of separate workstations and corresponding setups
Used in automated and semi automated mode
21
CNC Machining Center
Machine tool capable of performing multiple operations that use rotating tools on a workpart in one
setup under NC control”
Typical operations: milling, drilling, reaming, and tapping and related operations
Classification
vertical machining center
horizontal machining center
universal machining center
Typical features to reduce nonproductive time:
Automatic tool changer
Automatic work part positioning
Automatic pallet changer
22
CNC Turning Center
23
CNC Mill-Turn Center
Machine tool capable of performing multiple operations either with single point turning tools or
rotating cutters in one setup under NC control”
Typical operations:
Turning, milling, drilling and related operations
Enabling feature:
Capability to control position of any-axis in addition to x- and z-axis control (turning center is limited
to x- and z-axis control)
24
Part with Mill-Turn Features
1) Turn smaller diameter, (2) mill flat with part in programmed angular positions, four
positions for square cross section; (3) drill hole with part in programmed angular position,
and (4) cutoff of the machined piece
25
Applications of Single Station Manned Cells
CNC machining center with worker to load/unload
CNC turning center with worker to load/unload load/ unload
Cluster of two CNC turning centers with time sharing of one worker to load/unload load / unload
Plastic injection molding on semi-automatic cycle with worker to unload molding molding, sprue, and
runner
One worker at electronics subassembly workstation inserting components into PCB
Stamping press with worker loading blanks and unloading stamping each cycle
26
Applications of Single Station Manned Cells
CNC MC with APC and parts storage subsystem
CNC TC with robot and parts storage carousel
Cluster of ten CNC TCs, each with robot and parts storage carousel, and time sharing of one worker to
load/unload the carousels
Plastic injection molding on automatic cycle with robot arm to unload molding, sprue, and runner
Electronics assembly station with automated insertion machine inserting components into PCBs
Stamping press stamps parts from long coil
27
Analysis of Single-Station Cells-N umber of Workstations Required
28
Analysis of Single-Station Cells-N umber of Workstations Required
•TTsu= total setup time for all part styles included in the workload to be accomplished.
•Tsuj = setup time for part or product style j produced during the period, hr.
•AT = available time per cell, hr/cell; Hp = actual hours during the period, hr/cell
• A = availability.
29
Example 1. Number of Setups is Known
A total of 900 parts must be produced in the lathe section of the machine shop during a particular 40-hr
week. The parts are of 20 different styles, and each style is produced in its own batch. Average batch
quantity is 45 parts. Each batch requires a setup and the average setup time is 2.5 hr. The average
machine cycle time to produce a shaft is 10 min. Availability on the lathes is 100%. How many lathes are
required during the week?
•Solution:
•In this case the number of setups required during the week is known because the number of batches is
known: 20.
•Total workload for the 20 setups and 20 production runs is given by:
30
Example 2 Number of Setups is Not Known
•A total of 900 parts must be produced in the lathe section of the machine shop during a particular 40-hr
week. The parts are identical. How many lathes will be needed to produce the 900 parts, given that each
machine must be set up at the beginning of the week? Each setup takes 2.5 hr. Availability on the lathes
is 100%.The workload to actually produce the parts remains the same, 150 hr
Solution:
This is similar to Example 1, but the number of setups is equal to the number of machines that will be
required, and that number is not known, at least not yet. In this problem formulation, the number of
hours available on any lathe is reduced by the setup time. Adding the setup workload,
Solving for n,
31
Example 3: Including Availability and Defect Rate
Suppose that in the previous Example the anticipated availability of the lathes is 100% during setup and
92% during the production run. The fraction defect rate for lathe work of this type is 5%. Other data
from Example 1 are applicable.
How many lathes are required during the week, given this additional information?
Solution:
For setup, the workload is simply the time spent performing the 20 setups:
The available hours during the week are AT = 40 hr/machine. Thus, the number of lathes required just for
setup is determined as:
Given the fraction defect rate of 5%, the workload for the 20 production runs is computed:
•The available time is affected by the 92% availability:
33
Machine Clusters
How Many Machines For One Worker?
A machine shop has many CNC lathes that operate on a semiautomatic cycle under part program
control. A significant number of these machines produce the same part, with a machine cycle time =
2.75 min. One worker is required to perform unloading and loading of parts at the end of each cycle.
This takes 25 sec. Determine how many machines one worker can service if it takes an average of 20 sec
to walk between the machines and no machine idle time is allowed.
Solution: Given that Tm= 2.75 min, Ts= 25 sec = 0.4167 min, and Tr= 20 sec = 0.3333 min, the above
Equation can be used to obtain
Each worker can be assigned four machines. With a machine cycle Tc = 3.1667 min, the worker will
spend 4*(0.4167) = 1.667 min servicing the machines, 4*(0.3333) = 1.333 min walking between the
machines, and the worker’s idle time during the cycle will be 0.167 min (10 sec).
34
Manual Assembly Lines
35
Products Usually Made on Manual Assembly Lines
36
Why Assembly Lines are so Productive
Specialization of labor
Learning curve
Interchangeable parts
Components made to close tolerances
Work flow principle
Products are brought to the workers
Line pacing.
Workers must complete their tasks within the cycle time of the line
Speed in moving Assembly line
Space between the parts
Source:https://i1.wp.com/www.allaboutlean.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Continuous-Line-Two-Speed.gif?resize=486%2C281&ssl=1
37
Manual Assembly Line Defined
“A production line consisting of a sequence of workstations where assembly tasks are performed by
human workers as the product moves along the line”
38
Assembly Workstations
“A designated location along the work flow path at which one or more work elements (tasks) are
performed by one or more workers”
39
Assembly Workstations
40
Work Transport Systems
Manual Work Transport Systems
Work units are moved between stations by the workers without the aid of a powered conveyor
Problems:
Starving of stations (waiting for a work unit)
Blocking of stations (cannot pass the work unit to the next station)
No pacing
Mitigated by
Work units moved in batches (transfer batch)
Work units moved one at a time
Temporary storage
Troubles in this method
Increase the work in process
Workers are unpaced in lines
41
Work Transport Systems
42
Continuous Transport
43
Synchronous Transport
44
Asynchronous Transport
45
Material Handling equipment
46
Line Pacing
A manual assembly line operates at a certain cycle time -On average, each worker must complete
his/her assigned task within this cycle time or else the required production rate will not be achieved.
Pacing provides a discipline for the assembly line workers that more or less guarantees a certain
production rate for the line
Several levels of pacing:
Rigid pacing
Pacing with margin
No pacing
47
Rigid Pacing
Each worker is allowed only a certain fixed time each cycle to complete the assigned task
Allowed time is set equal to the cycle time less repositioning time
Synchronous work transport system provides rigid pacing
Undesirable aspects of rigid pacing:
Incompatible with inherent human variability
Emotionally and physically stressful to worker
Incomplete work units if task not completed
48
Pacing with Margin
Worker is allowed to complete the task within a specified time range, the upper limit of which is greater
than the cycle time
On average, the worker’s average task time must balance with the cycle time of the line
How to achieve pacing with margin:
Allow queues of work units between stations (asynchronous transport)
Provide for tolerance time to be longer than cycle time (continuous transport)
Allow worker to move beyond station boundaries
49
No Pacing
50
Coping with Product Variety
Single model assembly line (SMAL)
Every work unit is the same (products with high demand)
51
Analysis of Single model Assembly line
52
53
Line Balancing
54
Line Balancing
Minimum Rational Work Elements
A minimum rational work element is a small amount of work that has a specific limited objective
A minimum rational work element cannot be subdivided any further without loss of practicality
The sum of the work element times is equal to the work content time
•where Tek = time to perform work element k, min; and ne = number of work elements into which the
work content is divided, that is, k = 1, 2, p, ne.
•The task time at station i, or service time as it is called, Tsi, is composed of the work element times that
have been assigned to that station
55
Line Balancing
•Precedence Constraints
•Technological requirements on the work sequence are called precedence constraints
•Precedence diagram, which is a network diagram that indicates the sequence in which the
•work elements must be performed
•Work elements are symbolized by nodes, and the precedence requirements are indicated by arrows
connecting the nodes
•The sequence proceeds from left to right
56
A Problem for Line Balancing
•A small electrical appliance is to be produced on a single-model assembly line. The work content of
assembling the product has been reduced to the work elements listed in Table. The table also lists the
times for each element and the precedence order in which they must be performed. The line is to be
balanced for an annual demand of 100,000 units/yr. The line will operate 50 wk/yr, 5 shifts/wk, and 7.5
hr/shift. There will be one worker per station. Previous experience suggests that the uptime efficiency
for the line will be 96%, and repositioning time lost per cycle will be 0.08 min.
•Determine (a) total work content time Twc, (b) required hourly production rate Rp to achieve the annual
demand, (c) cycle time Tc, (d) theoretical minimum number of workers required on the line, and (e)
service time Ts to which the line must be balanced.
57
A Problem for Line Balancing
58
A Problem for Line Balancing
•(a) The total work content time is the sum of the work element times
•(e) The available service time against which the line must be balanced is
59
Measures of Line Balance Efficiency
differences in minimum rational work element times and the precedence constraints among the
elements
it is virtually impossible to obtain a perfect line balance
Measures must be defined to indicate how good a given line balancing solution is.
balance efficiency,
which is the work content time divided by the total available service time on the line
60
Line Balancing Algorithm
•The objective in line balancing is to distribute the total workload on the assembly line as evenly as
possible among the workers
Subject to:
61
1.Largest Candidate Rule
62
2.Kilbridge and Wester Method
63
3.Ranked Positional Weights Method
64
Time-Distance Relationships
The total elapsed time a work unit spends on the Tt = tolerance time, min/part
assembly line 65
Other Considerations in Assembly Line Design
Line efficiency
Methods analysis
Sharing work elements between two adjacent stations
Changing work head speeds at mechanized stations
Preassembly of components
Storage buffers between Stations
Zoning constraints
Parallel workstations
66
Parallel Work Stations for Better Line Balance
67
Alternative Assembly Systems
68
Automated production lines
69
Where to use automated production Lines
High demand
Stable product design
Long product life
Multiple operations performed on the product during its manufacture
Advantages
Low amount of direct labor
Low product cost, because the cost of fixed equipment is spread over many units
High production rate
Minimal work-in-progress and manufacturing lead time
Minimal use of factory floor space
70
Fundamentals of Automated Production Lines
71
Automated Production Lines
Work transport system
Synchronous
Asynchronous
Palletized transfer line
Pallet fixtures
Free Transfer Line
Part geometry allows transfer of parts with out fixtures
72
System Configurations
in-line
straight line arrangement
segmented in-line
two or more straight-line transfer sections,
available floor space may limit the length of the line,
a work piece can be reoriented
the rectangular layout to return of work-holding fixtures
rotary
73
Two machining Transfer lines
74
Different Types of Conveyors
Linear Transfer Systems
Walking Beam
Cart on Track
75
Rotary Indexing Machine-Geneva mechanism
76
Rotary Indexing Machine-Geneva mechanism
Ɵ = angle of rotation of worktable during indexing (degrees of
rotation)
N = rotational speed of driver, rev/min
ns = number of equally spaced slots in the Geneva.
The angle of driver rotation during indexing = 2θ
the angle of driver rotation during which the worktable experiences
dwell time is (360 - 2θ)
Example:
A rotary worktable is driven by a Geneva mechanism with six slots, as in the above. The driver
rotates at 30 rev/min. Determine the cycle time, available processing time, and the lost time each
cycle to index the table
77
Example 2
•A Geneva with six slots is used to operate the worktable of a dial-indexing machine. The slowest
workstation on the dial-indexing machine has an operation time of 2.5 sec, so the table must be in a
dwell position for this length of time. (a) At what rotational speed must the driven member of the
Geneva mechanism be turned to provide this dwell time? (b) What is the indexing time each cycle?
78
Storage Buffer
A location for temporary storage of Parts
Manual
Automated
To reduce the impact of station breakdowns
To provide a bank of parts to supply the line
To provide a place to put the output of the line
To allow for curing time or other process delay
To smooth cycle time variations
For Rotary Indexing Machine
Before a dial-indexing system
Following the dial-indexing machine
Between pairs of adjacent dial-indexing
machines.
Video
79
Control Function in an Automated Production Line
Sequential Control
To coordinate the sequence of action of the transfer systems and work stations
Safety Monitoring
To avoid hazardous operation for workers and equipment
Quality Control
To Detect and Possibly reject defective work units produced on the line
80
Control Function in an Automated Production Line
Line Controllers
Programmable Logic Controller
Computer based Control
Benefits of computer control
Recording data on process performance, equipment reliability, and product quality
Diagnostic routines to expedite maintenance and repair when line breakdowns occur and to reduce
the duration of downtime incidents
Generation of preventive maintenance schedules to reduce the frequency of downtime occurrences
81
Cycle Time Analysis
82
Cycle Time Analysis
•The frequency of line stops per cycle is obtained by merely summing the frequencies pi over the n stations,
that is,
83
Cycle Time Analysis
•automated transfer line is production rate (actual average production rate, pc/min)
•line efficiency
85
Transfer Line Performance
•(a) At 100% efficiency, the line produces 50 pc/hr. The reciprocal gives the unit time, or ideal cycle time
per piece:
•Given an average downtime of 8.0 min, the average production time per piece is
•Actual average production rate is the reciprocal of average production time per piece:
86
Transfer Line Performance
•Line efficiency is the ratio of ideal cycle time to actual average production time:
87
Automated Assembly System
“The use of mechanized and automated devices to perform the various assembly tasks in an assembly
line or cell”
Most automated assembly systems are designed to perform a fixed sequence of assembly steps on a
specific product that is produced in very large quantities
89
System Configuration
System Configuration
In-line assembly machine
Dial indexing machine
Carousel assembly system
Single-station assembly cell
90
In-Line Assembly Machine
91
Dial Indexing Machine
•Base parts are loaded onto fixtures or nests attached to a circular dial table, and components are added
at workstations located around the periphery of the dial as it indexes from station to station.
92
Carousel Assembly System
“A hybrid between circular work flow of dial indexing machine and straight work flow of in-line system”
93
Single-Station Assembly Cell
94
Multi-Station vs. Single-Station
95
Parts Delivery at Workstations
Typical parts delivery system at a workstation consists of the following hardware components:
Hopper - container for parts
Parts feeder - removes parts from hopper
Selector and/or orientor - to assure part is in Proper orientation for assembly at work head
Feed track - moves parts to assembly work head
Escapement and placement device – removes Parts from feed track and places them at station
96
Vibratory Bowl Feeder
97
Selector and/or Orientor
Purpose - to establish the proper orientation of the components for the assembly workhead
Selector
Acts as a filter
Only parts in proper orientation are allowed to pass through to feed track
Orientor
Allows properly oriented parts to pass
Reorients parts that are not properly oriented
Selector Orientor
98
Feed Track
Moves parts from hopper to assembly workhead
Categories:
Gravity - hopper and feeder are located at higher elevation than
workhead
Powered - uses air or vibration to move parts toward workhead
99
Escapement and Placement Devices
100
Quantitative Analysis of Assembly Systems
101
Analysis of Automated Assembly Systems
Parts Delivery System at Workstations
f removal rate of components from the hopper
θ be the proportion of components that pass through the selector-orientor
fθ the effective rate of delivery of components from the hopper into the feed track
(1- θ) recirculated back into the hopper
Assume f θ >Rc which leads queue in the feed track
Lf 2 Location of high level sensor (active length of feed track)
Lf 1 Location of low level sensor (active length of feed track)
Lc length of a component in the feed track
Nf 2 = Lf 2/Lc the number of parts that can be held in the feed track at Lf 2
It is the capacity of the feed tracker
•nf 1 = Lf 1/Lc the number of components in the feed track at this point is
•High level sensor is on – Rate of decrease is Rc
•Low level sensor is on – Rate of increase is f θ - Rc
102
Parts Delivery System in Automatic Assembly
•The cycle time for a given assembly work head = 6 sec. The parts feeder has a feed rate of 50
components per min. The probability that a given component fed by the feeder will pass through the
selector is θ = 0.25. The number of parts in the feed track corresponding to the low-level sensor is nf 1 =
6. The capacity of the feed track is nf 2 = 18 parts. Determine (a) how long it will take for the supply of
parts in the feed track to go from nf 2 to nf1, and (b) how long it will take on average for the supply of
parts to go from nf1 to nf 2.
103
Analysis Multistation Assembly Machines
q is the probability that the component to be added during the current cycle is defective (0≤q≤1)
m = probability that a defect results in a jam at the station and consequential stoppage of the line
Three possible events that might occur
The component is defective and causes a station jam. pi=miqi
The component is defective but does not cause a station jam. (1-mi)qi
The component is not defective. (1-qi)
The probabilities of the three possible events must sum to unity for any workstation
Probability of acceptable products
104
105
Analysis Multistation Assembly Machines
•A 10-station in-line assembly machine has an ideal cycle time = 6 sec. The base part is automatically
loaded prior to the first station, and components are added at each of the stations. The fraction defect
rate at each of the 10 stations is q = 0.01, and the probability that a defect will jam is m = 0.5. When a
jam occurs, the average downtime is 2 min. Cost to operate the assembly machine is $42.00/hr. Other
costs are ignored. Determine (a) average production rate of all assemblies, (b) yield of good assemblies,
(c) average production rate of good product, (d) uptime efficiency of the assembly machine, and (e) cost
per unit.
106
Single-Station Assembly Machines
•ne the number of distinct assembly elements that are performed on the machine
•Tej Each element has an element time, where j = 1, 2, p , ne.
•Th handling time (Min)
•Line Efficiency
107
Single-Station Automatic Assembly System
A single-station assembly machine performs five work elements to assemble four components to a base
part. The elements are listed in the table below, together with the fraction defect rate (q) and probability
of a station jam (m) for each of the components added (NA means not applicable). Time to load the base
part is 3 sec and time to unload the completed assembly is 4 sec, giving a total load/unload time of Th = 7
sec. When a jam occurs, it takes an average of 1.5 min to clear the jam and restart the machine.
Determine (a) production rate of all product, (b) yield of good product, (c) production rate of good
product, and (d) uptime efficiency of the assembly machine.
108
109
Analysis of Partial Automation
Assumptions:
workstations perform either processing or assembly operations
processing and assembly times at automated stations are constant, though not necessarily equal at
all stations
the system uses synchronous transfer of parts
the system has no internal buffer storage
station breakdowns occur only at automated stations
110
Partial Automation
The company is considering replacing one of the current manual workstations with an automatic work
head on a 10-station production line. The current line has six automatic stations and four manual
stations. Current cycle time is 30 sec. The limiting process time is at the manual station that is proposed
for replacement. Implementing the proposal would allow the cycle time to be reduced to 24 sec. The new
station would cost $0.20/min. Other cost data: Cw = $0.15/min, Cas = $0.10/min, and Cat $0.12/min.
Breakdowns occur at each automated station with a probability p = 0.01. The new automated station is
expected to have the same frequency of breakdowns. Average downtime per occurrence Td = 3.0 min,
which will be unaffected by the new station. Material costs and tooling costs will be neglected in the
analysis. It is desired to compare the current line with the proposed change on the basis of production
rate and cost per piece. Assume a yield of 100% good product.
111
112