The rubric evaluates lesson plans and teaching demonstrations on four criteria: topic and objectives, clarity and organization of the demonstration, teaching methods, and assessments. An excellent demonstration is well-aligned to measurable objectives and considers students' prior knowledge. It uses clear organization, engaging teaching strategies, and regular assessments ranging from low to high-order thinking. A satisfactory demonstration meets most criteria while a needs improvement demonstration is missing alignment or organization.
The rubric evaluates lesson plans and teaching demonstrations on four criteria: topic and objectives, clarity and organization of the demonstration, teaching methods, and assessments. An excellent demonstration is well-aligned to measurable objectives and considers students' prior knowledge. It uses clear organization, engaging teaching strategies, and regular assessments ranging from low to high-order thinking. A satisfactory demonstration meets most criteria while a needs improvement demonstration is missing alignment or organization.
The rubric evaluates lesson plans and teaching demonstrations on four criteria: topic and objectives, clarity and organization of the demonstration, teaching methods, and assessments. An excellent demonstration is well-aligned to measurable objectives and considers students' prior knowledge. It uses clear organization, engaging teaching strategies, and regular assessments ranging from low to high-order thinking. A satisfactory demonstration meets most criteria while a needs improvement demonstration is missing alignment or organization.
The rubric evaluates lesson plans and teaching demonstrations on four criteria: topic and objectives, clarity and organization of the demonstration, teaching methods, and assessments. An excellent demonstration is well-aligned to measurable objectives and considers students' prior knowledge. It uses clear organization, engaging teaching strategies, and regular assessments ranging from low to high-order thinking. A satisfactory demonstration meets most criteria while a needs improvement demonstration is missing alignment or organization.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Lesson Plan Defense and Teaching Demonstration Rubrics
https://images.app.goo.gl/Z4JWuFabVxxJ846p
Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Needs Not Score
Improvement Acceptable Topic and The topic is Topic is Topic is either Topic is not related appropriate for somewhat inappropriate suitable for objectives the amount of appropriate for for the given amount time available the amount of audience's of time and and the time available knowledge level of audience's level and the level or the knowledge of of knowledge. audience's level time allotted. the audience. of knowledge. Identified a determined too Specific sufficient Identified either many or too objectives number of too many or too few goals that were not relevant and few relevant might not be identified. measurable and measurable applicable or goals objectives. measurably (30) (10) (20) Clarity and Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration Demonstration organization is frame in the is frame in the is frame in the is frame in the of beginning with beginning with beginning with beginning with demonstration explicit the explicit explicit the list of reference to (a) reference to (a) reference to topics that will measurable measurable some be covered in objectives, (b) objectives (b) objectives and the session. relevant student general tasks general and (c) planned for the activities instructor session and (c) planned for the activities in the some session. session and associated associated formative The activities formative and/or do not seem and/or summative relevant and summative assessments. no assessments assessments. are indicated. The tasks or the assessments do not seem relevant to the objectives. (40) (25) (10) Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching Methods strategies and strategies and strategies or strategies and assessments assessments assessments assessments were aligned to methods used methods were methods were the objectives were not aligned to not aligned to appropriate to the objectives. the objectives. Students’ prior the objectives. knowledge Students’ prior Students’ prior levels were Students’ prior knowledge knowledge either assessed knowledge levels on the levels on the explicitly or levels on the topics were topic were not assumptions topic were assumed considered. were articulated implicitly incorrectly. in assumed It was difficult demonstration correctly but Transitions to follow the framing. not articulated between lesson. in the different parts Smooth beginning. of the lesson No activities transitions were not clear. were used to between Transitions create different parts between Used a few interactivity. of the lesson. different parts activities to of the lesson some No Used were somewhat teacher/student comprehension appropriate clear. interaction. checks. activities to create Used few Very few teacher/students activities to comprehensio and/or create n checks student/student teacher/student mostly interaction and/or targeting lower student/students order thinking Regular interaction but skills. comprehension did not rely on checks ranging lecture only. from low-level recall to higher- Regular order thinking comprehension skills checks mostly targeting (30) (20) (10) Total 100