Module 1 - Lesson 2
Module 1 - Lesson 2
Module 1 - Lesson 2
First Quarter
Weeks 1-4
Module Overview
This module is designed for Bachelor of Elementary Education that introduces Edukasyong
Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan with Entrepreneurship in the Philippine educational context.
To aid in your learning of those lessons aforementioned, this module contains lessons within a
chapter. Each lesson must be accomplished weekly and is further divided into parts, as follows:
1. Learning Compass
This portion orients you with the learning outcomes for the learning unit.
2. Let’s Begin!
After the identification of learning outcomes and overview for every lesson,
you will be given a task that leads you to the key concepts to be discussed
in that unit.
3. Let’s Learn
This serves as the discussion of the concepts of each lesson.
4. Take Note!
This provides the summary of the important concepts of the lesson.
5. How Far Have We Gone?
To check whether the given learning outcomes are met, you are given
another task to assess the extent of understanding.
6. Walk the Extra Mile!
Every unit is ended with suggested activities for the enrichment of learning
and further application of what has been learned.
UNIT 1
Learning Compass
At the end of the unit, the pre-service teacher can:
explain and be guided by the different learning theories needed in teaching EPP.
Let’s Begin!
…are you ready to share your knowledge? Here we go…
Think of a teacher that’s most unforgettable to you in elementary of high school. Are
there things that when you encounter at present (see, hear, touch, smell )make you “go back to
the past” and recall this teacher? What are these things?
The theory of behaviorism focuses on the study of observable and measurable behavior. It emphasizes that
behavior is mostly learned through conditioning and reinforcement (rewards and punishment). It does not
give much attention to the mind and the possibility of thought processes occurring in the mind.
Contributions in the development of the behaviorist theory largely came from Pavlov, Watson, Thorndike
and Skinner.
Classical Conditioning
Connectionism Operant Conditioning
(Pavlov/Watson
(Thorndike) (Skinner)
Primary Laws
Reinforcement
Law of Effect
Shaping of
Law of Exercise Behavior
Law of Readiness
Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist, is well known for his work in classical
conditioning or stimulus substitution. Pavlov’s most renowned experiment involved
meat, a dog and a bell. Initially, Pavlov was measuring the dog’s salivation in order
to study digestion. This is when he stumbled upon classical conditioning.
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
Bell No response
(Neutral stimulus)
Bell
(Neutral stimulus
Paired with
Salivation (Conditioned
Bell (Conditioned response)
Stimulus) Stimulus)
Somehow you were conditioned to associate particular objects with your teacher. So at present, when
you encounter the objects, you are also reminded of your teacher. This is an example of classical
conditioning.
Thorndike’s theory on connectionism, states that learning has taken place when a strong connection
or bond between stimulus and response is formed. He came up with three primary laws:
• Law of Effect. The law of effect states that a connection between a stimulus and response is
strengthened when the consequence to positive (reward) and the connection between the stimulus
and the response is weakened when the consequence is negative. Thorndike response is weakened
when the consequence is negative. Thorndike later on, revised this “law” when he found that
negative rewards (punishment) do not necessarily weaken bonds, and that some seemingly
pleasurable consequences do not necessarily motivate performance.
• Law of Exercise. This tells us that the more an S-R (stimulus-response) bond is practiced the
stronger it will become. “Practice makes perfect” seem to be associated with this. However, like
the law of effect, the law of exercise also had to be revised when Thorndike found that practice
without feedback does not necessarily enhance performance.
• Law of Readiness. This states that the more readiness the learner has to respond to the stimulus,
the stronger will be the bond between them. When a person is ready to respond to a stimulus and is
not made to respond, it becomes annoying to the person. For example, if the teacher says, “Okay
we will now watch the movie (stimulus) you’ve been waiting for.” And suddenly the power goes
off. The students will feel frustrated because they were ready to respond to the stimulus but was
prevented from doing so. Likewise, if the person is not at all ready to respond to stimuli and is
asked to respond, that also becomes annoying. For instance, the teacher calls a student to stand up
and recite, and then the teacher asks the question and expects the student to respond right away
when he is still not ready. This will be annoying to the student. That is why teachers should
remember to say the question first, and wait for a few seconds before calling on anyone to answer.
John Watson
John B. Watson was the first American psychologist to work with Pavlov’s ideas.
He too was initially involved in animal studies, then later became involved in human
behavior research. He considered that humans are born with a few reflexes and the
emotional reactions of love and rage. All other behavior is learned through stimulus-
response associations through conditioning. He believed in the power of
conditioning so much that he said that if he is given a dozen healthy infants he can
make them into anything you want them to be, basically through making stimulus-
response connections through conditioning.
Surely, Watson’s research methods would be questioned today, nevertheless, his work did clearly show
the role of conditioning in the development of emotional responses to certain stimuli. This may help us
understand the fears, phobias, and prejudices that people develop.
Skinner’s work differs from that of the three behaviorists before him in that he
studied
operant behavior (voluntary behaviors used in operating on the environment). Thus, his theory came to be
known as Operant Conditioning.
Operant Conditioning is based upon the notion that learning is a result of change in overt behavior.
Changes in behavior are the result of an individual’s response to events (stimuli) that occur in the
environment. A response produces a consequence such as defining a word, hitting a ball, or solving a math
problem. When a particular Stimulus-Response (S-R) pattern is reinforced (rewarded), the individual is
conditioned to respond.
Reinforcement is the key element in Skinner’s S-R theory. A reinforcer is anything that strengthens the
desired response. There is a positive reinforcer and a negative reinforcer.
A positive reinforcer is any stimulus that is given or added to increase the response. An example of
positive reinforcement is when a teacher promises extra time in the play area to children who behave well
during the lesson. Another is a mother who promises a new cellphone for her son who gets good grades.
Still, other examples include verbal phrases, star stamps, and stickers.
A negative reinforce is any stimulus that results in the increased frequency of a response when it is
withdrawn or removed. A negative reinforce is not a punishment, in fact it is a reward. For instance, a
teacher announces that a student who gets an average grade of 1.5 for the two grading periods will no longer
take the final examination, the negative reinforce is “removing” the final exam, which we realize is a form
of reward for working hard and getting an average grade of 1.5.
Skinner also looked into extinction or non-reinforcement: Responses that are not reinforced are
not likely to be repeated. For example, ignoring a student’s misbehavior may extinguish that behavior.
Reinforcement Schedules. Once the desired behavioral response is accomplished, reinforcement does not
have to be 100%; in fact, it can be maintained more successfully through what Skinner referred to as partial
reinforcement schedules. Partial reinforcement schedules include interval schedules and ratio schedules.
Fixed Interval Schedules. The target response is reinforced after a fixed amount of time has passed since
the last reinforcement. Example, the bird in a cage is given food (reinforce) every 10 minutes, regardless
of how many times it presses the bar.
Variable Interval Schedules. This is similar to fixed interval schedules but the amount of time that must
pass between reinforcement varies. Example, the bird may receive food (reinforce) different intervals, not
every ten minutes.
Fixed Ratio Schedules. A fixed number of correct responses must occur before reinforcement may recur.
Example, the bird will be given food (reinforce) everytime it presses the bar 5 times.
Variable Ratio Schedules. The number of correct repetitions of the correct response for reinforcement
varies, example, the bird is given food (reinforcer) after it presses the bar 3 times, then after 10 times, then
after 4 times. So the bird will not be able to predict how many times it needs to press the bar before it gets
food again.
Variable interval and especially, variable ratio schedules produce steadier and more persistent rates
of response because the learners cannot predict when the reinforcement will come although they know that
they will eventually succeed. An example of this is why people continue to buy lotto tickets even when an
almost negligible percentage of people actually win. While it is true that very rarely there is a big winner,
but once in a while somebody hits the jackpot (reinforcement). People cannot predict when the jackpot can
be gotten (variable interval) so they continue to buy tickets (repetition of response).
Implication of Operant Conditioning. These implications are given for programmed instruction.
1. Practice should take the form of question (stimulus) – answer (response) frames which expose the
student to the subject in gradual steps.
2. Require that the learner makes a response for every frame and receives immediate feedback.
3. Try to arrange the difficulty of the questions so the response is always correct and hence, a positive
reinforcement.
4. Ensure that good performance in the lesson is paired with secondary reinforcers such as verbal
praise, prizes and good grades.
Advance Organizer
Neo Behaviorism
Tolman’s Purposive Bandura Social-
Behaviorism Learning Theory
Goal-Directedness Principles
Intervening Variables
Applied in human learning, since student passes by the same route going to school every day, he acquires
a cognitive map of the location of his school. So when the transportation re-routing is done, he can still
figure out what turns to make to get to school the shortest or easiest way.
Latent Learning is a kind of learning that remains or stays with the individual until needed. It is learning
that is not outwardly manifested at once. According to Tolman it can exist even without reinforcement. He
demonstrated this in his rat experiments wherein rats apparently “learned the maze” by forming cognitive
maps of the maze, but manifested this knowledge of the maze only when they needed to.
Applied in human learning, a two-year old always sees her dad operate the t.v. remote control and observes
how the t.v. is turned on or how channel is changed, and volume adjusted. After sometime, the parents are
surprised that on the first time that their daughter holds the remote control, she already knows which buttons
to press for what function. Through latent learning, the child knew the skills beforehand, even though she
has never done them before.
The concept of intervening variable. Intervening variables are variables that are not readily seen but
serve as determinants of behavior. Tolman believed that learning is mediated or is influenced by
expectations, perceptions, representations, needs and other internal or environmental variables. Example,
in his experiments with rats he found out that hunger was an intervening variable.
Reinforcement not essential for learning. Tolman concluded that reinforcement is not essential for
leaning, although it provides an incentive for performance. In his studies, he observed that a rat was able to
acquire knowledge of the way through a maze, i.e., to develop a cognitive map, even in the absence of
reinforcement.
SOCIAL LEARNING
Albert Bandura’s Social learning theory focuses on the learning that occurs within a social context. It
considers that people learn from one another, including such concepts as observational learning, imitation
and modeling. The ten-year old boy Sergio Pelico did watch Saddam’s execution on TV and then must have
imitated it.
Among others, Albert Bandura is considered the leading proponent of this theory.
Social learning theory has cognitive factors as well as behaviorist factors (actually operant
factors)
1. Learning without performance: Bandura makes a distinction between learning through observation
and the actual imitation of what has been learned. This is similar to Tolman’s latent learning.
2. Cognitive processing during learning: Social learning theorists content that attention is a critical
factor in learning.
3. Expectations: As a result of being reinforced, people form expectations about the consequences
that future behaviors are likely to bring. They expect certain behaviors to bring reinforcements and
others to bring punishment. The learner needs to be aware, however, of the response reinforcements
and response punishment. Reinforcement increases a response only when the learner is aware of
that connection.
4. Reciprocal causation: bandura proposed that behavior can influence both the environment and the
person, in fat each of these three variables, the person, the behavior, and the environment can have
an influence on each other.
CONSTRUCTIVIST (CONSTRUCTIVISM)
What is meant by constructivism? The term refers to the idea that learners construct knowledge for
themselves---each learner individually (and socially) constructs meaning---as he or she learns.
Constructing meaning is learning; there is no other kind. The dramatic consequences of this view are
twofold;
Advance Organizer
Constructivism
Views of Characteristics of
Organizing Knowledge
Constructivism Constructivism
Individual
Constructivism
Social Constructivism
• Concepts as Feature Lists. Learning a concept involves learning specific features that characterize
positive instance of the concept. Included here are defining features and correlational feature. A
defining feature is a characteristic present in ALL instances. Example, a triangle has three sides.
Having three sides is a defining feature of a triangle because ALL triangles should have three sides.
If one doesn’t then it is not a triangle. A correlational feature is one that is present in many
positive instances but not essential for concept membership. For example, a mother is loving. Being
loving is a feature commonly present in the concept of a mother. But a mother may not be loving.
So “being loving” is only a correlational feature, not a defining one.
• Concepts as Prototypes. A prototype is an idea or a visual image of a “typical” example. It is
usually formed based on the positive instances that learners encounter most often. Example, close
your eyes now and for a moment think of a cat. Picture in mind what it looks like. You probably
thought of an image of the common car we see, rather than some rare breed or species. Once
learners have their own concept of prototypes, the new examples that they see are checked against
this existing prototype.
• Concepts as Exemplars. Exemplars represent a variety if examples. It allows learners to know that
an example under a concept may have variability. Example, a learner’s concept of vegetable may
include a variety of different examples like cauliflower, kangkong, cabbage, string beans, squash,
corn, potatoes. When he encounters a new type of vegetable like “bitsuelas”, he would search from
the exemplars he knows and looks for one that is most similar, like string beans.
Making Concept-learning Effective. As a future teacher, you can help students learn concepts by doing
the following:
• Aim to make learners understand a few key ideas in an in-depth manner, rather than taking u so
many topics superficially.
• Give varied examples.
• Provide opportunities for experimentation.
• Provide lots of opportunities for quality interaction.
• Have lots of hands-on activities.
• Relate your topic to real life situations.
• Do not depend on the explanation method all the time.
COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE
Gestalt psychology was at the forefront of the cognitive psychology. It served as the foundation of the
cognitive perspective to learning. It opposed the external and mechanistic focus of behaviorism. It
considered the mental processes and products of perception.
Advance Organizer
Gestalt Psychology
Law of closure
Law of closure
Law of closure
Gestalt theory was the initial cognitive response to behaviorism. It emphasized the importance of sensory
wholes and the dynamic nature of visual perception. The term gestalt means “form” or “configuration.”
Psychologists Max Wertheimer, Wolfgang Kohler and Kurt Koffka studied perception and concluded
that perceivers (or learners) are not passive, but rather active. They suggested that learners do not just collect
information as is but they actively process and restructure data in order to understand it. This is the
perceptual process. Certain factors impact on this perceptual process. Factors like past experiences, needs,
attitudes and one’s present situation can affect their perception.
Gestalt Principles
Law of Proximity.
Elements that are closer
together will be perceived as coherent objective. On the left, there
appears to be four columns, while on the right, there appears to be four
horizontal rows. When objects we are perceiving are near each other, we
perceive them as belonging together.
Law of Similarity. Elements that look similar will be perceived as part of the same form. There
seems to be a triangle in the square. We link similar elements together.
EXPERIANTIALISM
Learning by doing. This is the basis for the experiential learning theory. Experiential learning
focuses on the idea that the best ways to learn things is by actually having experiences. Those experiences
then stick out in your mind and help you retain information and remember facts.
David Kolb is best known for his work on the experiential learning theory or ELT. Kolb published
this model in 1984, getting his influence from other great theorists including John Dewey, Kurt Lewin, and
Jean Piaget. The experiential learning theory works in four stages—concrete learning, reflective
observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. The first two stages of the cycle
involve grasping an experience, the second two focus on transforming an experience. Kolb argues that
effective learning is seen as the learner goes through the cycle, and that they can enter into the cycle at any
time.
• Concrete learning is when a learner gets a new experience, or interprets a past experience
in a new way.
• Reflective observation comes next, where the learner reflects on their experience
personally. They use the lens of their experience and understanding to reflect on what this
experience means.
• Abstract conceptualization happens as the learner forms new ideas or adjusts their
thinking based on the experience and their reflection about it.
• Active experimentation is where the learner applies the new ideas to the world around
them, to see if there are any modifications to be made. This process can happen over a short
period of time, or over a long span of time.
Kolb went on to explain that learners will have their own preferences for how they enter the cycle
of experiential learning, and that these preferences boil down to a learning cycle.
Take Note!
REMEMBER:
REFERENCES
https://tarunagoel.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-we-need-
learningtheories.html
https://www.exploratorium.edu/education/ifi/constructivist-learning
https://www.wgu.edu/blog/experiential-learning-theory2006.html