Module 1 - Lesson 2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 23

Module for Students

First Quarter

Weeks 1-4

Module Overview
This module is designed for Bachelor of Elementary Education that introduces Edukasyong
Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan with Entrepreneurship in the Philippine educational context.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 1 | 24


This course shall include pedagogical content, knowledge and skills in technology and livelihood
education necessary in teaching and learning in the elementary level. Selected topics in
agriculture, industrial arts, fisheries, and livelihood education and entrepreneurship shall form a
major part of the course. The students will learn appropriate teaching and assessment strategies
and techniques including preparation of fruitful and usable projects that can be utilized in
teaching TLE in the elementary grades. This course will utilize project based and experiential
learning approaches.

Unit 1. Importance of Edukasyon Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan withEntrepreneurship


in the K-12 Curriculum
1. Components of EPP in the K-12 Curriculum
A. Industrial Arts
B. Home Economics
C. Agriculture
D. Theories of Entrepreneurship

Unit 2. Learning Theories and their Impact to EPP Teaching


A. Behaviourism
B. Constructivist
C. Social Learning
D. Cognitivism
E. Experientialism

How to learn from this module

To aid in your learning of those lessons aforementioned, this module contains lessons within a
chapter. Each lesson must be accomplished weekly and is further divided into parts, as follows:

1. Learning Compass
This portion orients you with the learning outcomes for the learning unit.
2. Let’s Begin!
After the identification of learning outcomes and overview for every lesson,
you will be given a task that leads you to the key concepts to be discussed
in that unit.
3. Let’s Learn
This serves as the discussion of the concepts of each lesson.
4. Take Note!
This provides the summary of the important concepts of the lesson.
5. How Far Have We Gone?
To check whether the given learning outcomes are met, you are given
another task to assess the extent of understanding.
6. Walk the Extra Mile!
Every unit is ended with suggested activities for the enrichment of learning
and further application of what has been learned.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 2 | 24


This module also includes a Chapter Reflection at the end of every chapter to jot down your
thoughts by answering self-introspective questions. Rubrics are also found in this module’s
Appendices for your reference in making your outputs. Just follow the notes below each exercise and
activity for guidance. Lastly, a Course Feedback is provided at the end of this module for you to share
your evaluative feedback of this module. This part will be our basis for improvement for future revision.

Welcome to this learning adventure!

UNIT 1

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 3 | 24


“The best way to predict the FUTURE, is to create it!” – Peter Drucker

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 4 | 24


LESSON 2
Learning Theories and their Impact to EPP Teaching

Learning Compass
At the end of the unit, the pre-service teacher can:
explain and be guided by the different learning theories needed in teaching EPP.

Let’s Begin!
…are you ready to share your knowledge? Here we go…

Think of a teacher that’s most unforgettable to you in elementary of high school. Are
there things that when you encounter at present (see, hear, touch, smell )make you “go back to
the past” and recall this teacher? What are these things?

Let’s Discuss (Weeks 3-4)


Introduction:

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 5 | 24


Learning theory describes how students receive, process, and retain knowledge during learning.
Cognitive, emotional, and environmental influences, as well as prior experience, all play a part in how
understanding, or a world view, is acquired or changed and knowledge and skills retained.

Learning design should be based on learning theories because:


• Theories provide a basis to understand how people learn and a way to explain, describe, analyze
and predict learning. In that sense, a theory helps us make more informed decisions around the
design, development and delivery of learning.
• There are different learning theories (behaviourism, cognitivism, constructivism, connectivism,
etc.). These theorists have thought deeply about learning and contemplated and researched it
extensively. Learning designers can leverage this knowledge to think critically about learning and
education.
• Learning theories offer frameworks that help understand how information is used, how knowledge
is created and how learning takes place. Learning designers can apply these frameworks according
to different learning and learner needs and make more informed decisions about choosing the right
instructional practices.

There is no one ‘best’ learning theory because:


• Each theory offers a different way to look at learning and the essential ingredients that make
learning happen. Using these theories as lenses, learning designers can understand and describe the
role of the learner, role of the instructor/teacher/facilitator and how learning happens in different
ways. Each theory has influenced and shaped instructional practices and methods and all new
theories will continue to do so.
• Different theories provide the context of learning, underlying motivation and methods of teaching
and these have implications for designing and delivering instruction. Also, different theories are
best suited to different learning outcomes and different audience profiles.
• Since each theory comprises of facts and assumptions, learning designers must begin the design of
training by first identifying the goal of training and then select the right theoretical framework that
can help achieve those learning outcomes.

LEARNING THEORIES BEHAVIORISM

Behaviorism is a worldview that assumes a learner is essentially passive,


responding to environmental stimuli. The learner starts off as a clean slate (i.e.
tabula rasa) and behavior is shaped through positive reinforcement or negative
reinforcement. Both positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement
increase the probability that the antecedent behavior will happen again. In
contrast, punishment (both positive and negative) decreases the likelihood that
the antecedent behavior will happen again. Positive indicates the application of
a stimulus; Negative indicates the withholding of a stimulus. Learning is
therefore defined as a change in behavior in the
learner.

The theory of behaviorism focuses on the study of observable and measurable behavior. It emphasizes that
behavior is mostly learned through conditioning and reinforcement (rewards and punishment). It does not
give much attention to the mind and the possibility of thought processes occurring in the mind.
Contributions in the development of the behaviorist theory largely came from Pavlov, Watson, Thorndike
and Skinner.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 6 | 24


Behaviorism
Advance Organizer

Classical Conditioning
Connectionism Operant Conditioning
(Pavlov/Watson
(Thorndike) (Skinner)

Primary Laws
Reinforcement
Law of Effect
Shaping of
Law of Exercise Behavior

Law of Readiness
Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist, is well known for his work in classical
conditioning or stimulus substitution. Pavlov’s most renowned experiment involved
meat, a dog and a bell. Initially, Pavlov was measuring the dog’s salivation in order
to study digestion. This is when he stumbled upon classical conditioning.

Pavlov’s Experiment. Before conditioning, ringing the bell (neutral stimulus)


caused no response from the dog. Placing food (unconditioned stimulus) in front of
the dog initiated salivation (unconditional response). During conditioning, the bell
was rung a few seconds before the dog was presented with food. After conditioning,
the ringing of the bell (Conditioned stimulus) alone produced salivation (conditioned
response). This is classical conditioning.

CLASSICAL CONDITIONING

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 7 | 24


Stage 1 – Before conditioning

Bell No response
(Neutral stimulus)

Step 2 – During conditioning

Bell
(Neutral stimulus

Paired with

Meat (Unconditioned Salivation (Unconditioned


stimulus) response)

Stage 3 – After conditioning

Salivation (Conditioned
Bell (Conditioned response)
Stimulus) Stimulus)

Somehow you were conditioned to associate particular objects with your teacher. So at present, when
you encounter the objects, you are also reminded of your teacher. This is an example of classical
conditioning.

Pavlov also had the following findings:


• Stimulus Generalization. Once the dog has learned to salivate at the sound of the bell, it
will salivate at other similar sounds.
• Extinction. If you stop pairing the bell with the food, salivation will eventually cease in
response to the bell.
• Spontaneous Recovery. Extinguished responses can be “recovered” after an elapsed time,
but will soon extinguish again if the dog is not presented with food.
• Discrimination. The dog could learn to discriminate between similar bells (stimuli) and
discern which bell would result in the presentation of food and which would not.
• Higher-Order Conditioning. Once the dog has been conditioned to associate the bell with
food, another unconditioned stimulus, such as a light may be flashed at the same time that
the bell is rung. Eventually, the dog will salivate at the flash of the light without the sound
of the bell.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 8 | 24


Edward L. Thorndike
Edward Thorndike’s Connectionism theory gave us the original S-R framework
of behavioral psychology. More than a hundred years ago he wrote a textbook
entitled, Educational Psychology. He was the first one to use this term. He
explained that learning is the result if associations forming between stimuli (S) and
responses (R). Such associations or “habits” become strengthened or weakened by
the nature and frequency of the S-R pairings. The model for S-R theory was trial
and error learning in which certain responses came to be repeated more than others
because of rewards. The main principle of connectionism (like all behavioral
theory) was that learning could be adequately explained without considering any
unobservable internal states.

Thorndike’s theory on connectionism, states that learning has taken place when a strong connection
or bond between stimulus and response is formed. He came up with three primary laws:
• Law of Effect. The law of effect states that a connection between a stimulus and response is
strengthened when the consequence to positive (reward) and the connection between the stimulus
and the response is weakened when the consequence is negative. Thorndike response is weakened
when the consequence is negative. Thorndike later on, revised this “law” when he found that
negative rewards (punishment) do not necessarily weaken bonds, and that some seemingly
pleasurable consequences do not necessarily motivate performance.
• Law of Exercise. This tells us that the more an S-R (stimulus-response) bond is practiced the
stronger it will become. “Practice makes perfect” seem to be associated with this. However, like
the law of effect, the law of exercise also had to be revised when Thorndike found that practice
without feedback does not necessarily enhance performance.
• Law of Readiness. This states that the more readiness the learner has to respond to the stimulus,
the stronger will be the bond between them. When a person is ready to respond to a stimulus and is
not made to respond, it becomes annoying to the person. For example, if the teacher says, “Okay
we will now watch the movie (stimulus) you’ve been waiting for.” And suddenly the power goes
off. The students will feel frustrated because they were ready to respond to the stimulus but was
prevented from doing so. Likewise, if the person is not at all ready to respond to stimuli and is
asked to respond, that also becomes annoying. For instance, the teacher calls a student to stand up
and recite, and then the teacher asks the question and expects the student to respond right away
when he is still not ready. This will be annoying to the student. That is why teachers should
remember to say the question first, and wait for a few seconds before calling on anyone to answer.

Principles Derived from Thorndike’s Connectionism:


1. Learning requires both practice and rewards (law of effect/exercise).
2. A series of S-R connections can be chained together if they belong to the same action sequence
(law of readiness).
3. Transfer of learning occurs because of previously encountered situations.
4. Intelligence is a function of the number of connections learned.

John Watson

John B. Watson was the first American psychologist to work with Pavlov’s ideas.
He too was initially involved in animal studies, then later became involved in human
behavior research. He considered that humans are born with a few reflexes and the
emotional reactions of love and rage. All other behavior is learned through stimulus-
response associations through conditioning. He believed in the power of
conditioning so much that he said that if he is given a dozen healthy infants he can
make them into anything you want them to be, basically through making stimulus-
response connections through conditioning.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 9 | 24


Experiment on Albert
Watson applied classical conditioning in his experiment concerning Albert, a young child and a white rat.
In the beginning, Albert was not afraid of the rat; but Watson made a sudden noise each time Albert touched
the rat. Because Albert was frightened by the loud noise, he soon became conditioned to fear and avoid the
rat. Later, the child’s response was generalized to other small animals. Now, he was also afraid of small
animals. Watson then “extinguished” or made the child “unlearn” fear by showing the rat without the loud
noise.

Surely, Watson’s research methods would be questioned today, nevertheless, his work did clearly show
the role of conditioning in the development of emotional responses to certain stimuli. This may help us
understand the fears, phobias, and prejudices that people develop.

Burrhus Frederick Skinner


Like Pavlov, Watson and Thorndike, Skinner believed in the stimulus-response pattern
of conditioned behavior. His theory zeroed in only on changes in observable behavior,
excluding any likelihood of any processes taking place in the mind. Skinner’s 1948
book, Walden Two, is about a utopian society based in operant conditioning. He also
wrote, Science and Human Behavior, (1953) in which he pointed out how the principles
of operant conditioning function in social institutions such as government, law,
religion, economics and education.

Skinner’s work differs from that of the three behaviorists before him in that he
studied
operant behavior (voluntary behaviors used in operating on the environment). Thus, his theory came to be
known as Operant Conditioning.

Operant Conditioning is based upon the notion that learning is a result of change in overt behavior.
Changes in behavior are the result of an individual’s response to events (stimuli) that occur in the
environment. A response produces a consequence such as defining a word, hitting a ball, or solving a math
problem. When a particular Stimulus-Response (S-R) pattern is reinforced (rewarded), the individual is
conditioned to respond.

Reinforcement is the key element in Skinner’s S-R theory. A reinforcer is anything that strengthens the
desired response. There is a positive reinforcer and a negative reinforcer.

A positive reinforcer is any stimulus that is given or added to increase the response. An example of
positive reinforcement is when a teacher promises extra time in the play area to children who behave well
during the lesson. Another is a mother who promises a new cellphone for her son who gets good grades.
Still, other examples include verbal phrases, star stamps, and stickers.

A negative reinforce is any stimulus that results in the increased frequency of a response when it is
withdrawn or removed. A negative reinforce is not a punishment, in fact it is a reward. For instance, a
teacher announces that a student who gets an average grade of 1.5 for the two grading periods will no longer
take the final examination, the negative reinforce is “removing” the final exam, which we realize is a form
of reward for working hard and getting an average grade of 1.5.

A negative reinforce is different from a punishment because a punishment is a consequence intended to


result in reduced responses. An example would be a student who always comes late is not allowed to join
a group work that has already began (punishment) and therefore, loses points for that activity. The
punishment was done to reduce the response of repeatedly coming to class late.

Skinner also looked into extinction or non-reinforcement: Responses that are not reinforced are
not likely to be repeated. For example, ignoring a student’s misbehavior may extinguish that behavior.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 10 | 24


Shaping of Behavior. An animal on a cage may take a very long time to figure out that pressing a lever
will produce food. To accomplish such behavior, successive approximations of the behavior are rewarded
until the animal learns the association between the lever and the food reward. To begin shaping, the animal
may be rewarded for simply turning in the direction of the lever, then for moving toward the lever, for
brushing against the lever, and finally for pressing the lever.
Behavioral chaining comes about when a series of steps are needed to be learned. The animal would
master each step in sequence until the entire sequence is learned. This can be applied to a child being taught
to tie a shoelace. The child can be given reinforcement (rewards) until the entire process of tying the
shoelace is learned.

Reinforcement Schedules. Once the desired behavioral response is accomplished, reinforcement does not
have to be 100%; in fact, it can be maintained more successfully through what Skinner referred to as partial
reinforcement schedules. Partial reinforcement schedules include interval schedules and ratio schedules.

Fixed Interval Schedules. The target response is reinforced after a fixed amount of time has passed since
the last reinforcement. Example, the bird in a cage is given food (reinforce) every 10 minutes, regardless
of how many times it presses the bar.

Variable Interval Schedules. This is similar to fixed interval schedules but the amount of time that must
pass between reinforcement varies. Example, the bird may receive food (reinforce) different intervals, not
every ten minutes.

Fixed Ratio Schedules. A fixed number of correct responses must occur before reinforcement may recur.
Example, the bird will be given food (reinforce) everytime it presses the bar 5 times.

Variable Ratio Schedules. The number of correct repetitions of the correct response for reinforcement
varies, example, the bird is given food (reinforcer) after it presses the bar 3 times, then after 10 times, then
after 4 times. So the bird will not be able to predict how many times it needs to press the bar before it gets
food again.
Variable interval and especially, variable ratio schedules produce steadier and more persistent rates
of response because the learners cannot predict when the reinforcement will come although they know that
they will eventually succeed. An example of this is why people continue to buy lotto tickets even when an
almost negligible percentage of people actually win. While it is true that very rarely there is a big winner,
but once in a while somebody hits the jackpot (reinforcement). People cannot predict when the jackpot can
be gotten (variable interval) so they continue to buy tickets (repetition of response).

Implication of Operant Conditioning. These implications are given for programmed instruction.
1. Practice should take the form of question (stimulus) – answer (response) frames which expose the
student to the subject in gradual steps.
2. Require that the learner makes a response for every frame and receives immediate feedback.
3. Try to arrange the difficulty of the questions so the response is always correct and hence, a positive
reinforcement.
4. Ensure that good performance in the lesson is paired with secondary reinforcers such as verbal
praise, prizes and good grades.

Principles Derived from Skinner’s Operant Conditioning


1. Behavior that is positively reinforced will reoccur; intermittent reinforcement is particularly
effective.
2. Information should be presented in small amounts so that responses can be reinforced (“shaping”).
3. Reinforcements will generalize across similar stimuli (“stimulus generalization”) producing
secondary conditioning.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 11 | 24


Neo Behaviorism: Tolman and Bandura
With new researchers, explanations provided by the basic principles of behaviorism appeared not to satisfy
all learning scenarios. New theories came into view which maintained some of the behaviorist concepts but
excluded others, and added new ideas which later came to be associated with the cognitive views of
learning. The neo-behaviorists, then, were a transitional group, bridging the gap between behaviorism and
cognitive theories of learning.

Advance Organizer
Neo Behaviorism
Tolman’s Purposive Bandura Social-
Behaviorism Learning Theory

Goal-Directedness Principles

Cognitive Maps Modeling

Four Conditions for


Latent Learning Effective Modeling

Intervening Variables

Tolman’s Purposive Behaviorism


Purposive behaviorism has also been referred to as Sign Learning Theory and is often seen as the link
between behaviorism and cognitive theory. Tolman’s theory was founded on two psychological views:
those of the Gestalt psychologists and those of John Watson, the behaviorist.
Tolman believed that learning is a cognitive process. Learning involves forming believes and obtaining
knowledge about the environment and then revealing that knowledge through purposeful and goal-directed
behavior.
Tolman stated in his sign theory that an organism learns by pursuing signs to a goal. i.e., learning is
acquired through meaningful behavior. He stressed the organized aspect of learning: “The stimuli which
are allowed in are not connected by just simple one-to-one switches to the outgoing responses. Rather the
incoming impulses are usually worked over and elaborated in the central control room into a tentative
cognitive-like map of the environment. And it is this tentative map, indicating routes and paths and
environmental relationships, which finally determines what responses, if any, the animal will finally make.”
Tolman’s form of behaviorism stressed the relationships between stimuli rather than stimulusresponse.
Tolman said that the new stimulus (the sign) becomes associated with already meaningful stimulus (the
significate) through a series of pairings; there is no need for reinforcement in order to establish learning.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 12 | 24


Tolman’s Key Concepts
• Learning is always purposive and goal-directed. Tolman asserted that learning is always
purposive and goal-directed. He held the notion that an organism acted or responded for some
adaptive purpose. He believed individuals do more than merely responded to stimuli; they act on
beliefs, attitudes, changing conditions, and they strive toward goals. Tolman saw behavior as
holistic, purposive and cognitive.
• Cognitive Maps in rats. In his most famous experiment, one group of rats was placed at random
starting locations in a maze but the food was always in the same location. Another group of rats
had the food placed in different locations which always required exactly the same pattern of turns
from their starting location. The group that had the food in the same location performed much better
than the group, supposedly demonstrating that they had learned the location rather than a specific
sequence of turns. This is tendency to “learn location” signified that rats somehow formed
cognitive maps that help them perform well on the maze. He also found out that organisms will
select the shortest or easiest path to achieve a goal.

Applied in human learning, since student passes by the same route going to school every day, he acquires
a cognitive map of the location of his school. So when the transportation re-routing is done, he can still
figure out what turns to make to get to school the shortest or easiest way.
Latent Learning is a kind of learning that remains or stays with the individual until needed. It is learning
that is not outwardly manifested at once. According to Tolman it can exist even without reinforcement. He
demonstrated this in his rat experiments wherein rats apparently “learned the maze” by forming cognitive
maps of the maze, but manifested this knowledge of the maze only when they needed to.
Applied in human learning, a two-year old always sees her dad operate the t.v. remote control and observes
how the t.v. is turned on or how channel is changed, and volume adjusted. After sometime, the parents are
surprised that on the first time that their daughter holds the remote control, she already knows which buttons
to press for what function. Through latent learning, the child knew the skills beforehand, even though she
has never done them before.

The concept of intervening variable. Intervening variables are variables that are not readily seen but
serve as determinants of behavior. Tolman believed that learning is mediated or is influenced by
expectations, perceptions, representations, needs and other internal or environmental variables. Example,
in his experiments with rats he found out that hunger was an intervening variable.

Reinforcement not essential for learning. Tolman concluded that reinforcement is not essential for
leaning, although it provides an incentive for performance. In his studies, he observed that a rat was able to
acquire knowledge of the way through a maze, i.e., to develop a cognitive map, even in the absence of
reinforcement.

SOCIAL LEARNING

Albert Bandura’s Social learning theory focuses on the learning that occurs within a social context. It
considers that people learn from one another, including such concepts as observational learning, imitation
and modeling. The ten-year old boy Sergio Pelico did watch Saddam’s execution on TV and then must have
imitated it.
Among others, Albert Bandura is considered the leading proponent of this theory.

General principles of social learning theory


1. People can learn by observing the behavior of others and the outcomes of those behaviors.
2. Learning can occur without a change in behavior. Behaviorism say that learning has to be
represented by a permanent change in behavior, in contrast social learning theorists say that because
people can learn through observation alone, their learning may not necessarily be shown in their
performance. Learning may or may not result in a behavior change.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 13 | 24


3. Cognition plays a role in learning. Over the last 30 years, social learning theory has become
increasingly cognitive in its interpretation of human learning. Awareness and expectations of
future reinforcements or punishments can have a major effect on the behaviors that people exhibit.
4. Social learning theory can be considered a bridge or a transition between behaviorist learning
theories and cognitive learning theories.

How the environment reinforces and punishes modeling


People are often reinforced for modeling the behavior of others. Bandura suggested that the
environment also reinforces modeling. This is in several possible ways:
1. The observer is reinforced by the model. For examples a student who changes dress to fit in with
a certain group of students has a strong likelihood of being accepted and thus reinforced by that
group.
2. The observer is reinforced by a third person. The observer might be modeling the actions of
someone else, for example, an outstanding class leader or student. The teacher notices this and
compliments and praises the observer for modeling such behavior thus reinforcing that behavior.
3. The initiated behavior itself leads to reinforcing consequences. Many behaviors that we learn from
others produce satisfying or reinforcing results. For example, a student in my multimedia class
could observe how the extra work a classmate does is fun. This student in turn would do the same
extra work and also experience enjoyment.
4. Consequences of the model’s behavior affect the observer’s behavior vicariously. This is known
as vicarious reinforcement. This is where the model is reinforced for a response and then the
observer shows an increase in that same response. Bandura illustrated this by having students
watch a film of a model hitting an inflated clown doll. One group of children saw the model being
praised for such action. Without being reinforced, the group of children began to also hit the doll.

Contemporary social learning perspective of reinforcement and punishment


1. Contemporary theory proposes that both reinforcement and punishment have indirect effects on
learning. They are not the sole or main cause.
2. Reinforcement and punishment influence the extent to which an individual exhibits a behavior that
has been learned.
3. The expectation of reinforcement influences cognitive processes that promote learning. Therefore,
attentions pays a critical role in learning, and attention is influenced by the expectation of
reinforcement. An example would be, when the teacher tells a group of students that what they will
study next is not on the test. Students will not pay attention because they do not expect to know the
information for a test.

Cognitive factors in social learning

Social learning theory has cognitive factors as well as behaviorist factors (actually operant
factors)
1. Learning without performance: Bandura makes a distinction between learning through observation
and the actual imitation of what has been learned. This is similar to Tolman’s latent learning.
2. Cognitive processing during learning: Social learning theorists content that attention is a critical
factor in learning.
3. Expectations: As a result of being reinforced, people form expectations about the consequences
that future behaviors are likely to bring. They expect certain behaviors to bring reinforcements and
others to bring punishment. The learner needs to be aware, however, of the response reinforcements
and response punishment. Reinforcement increases a response only when the learner is aware of
that connection.
4. Reciprocal causation: bandura proposed that behavior can influence both the environment and the
person, in fat each of these three variables, the person, the behavior, and the environment can have
an influence on each other.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 14 | 24


5. Modeling: There are different types of models. There is the live model, an actual person
demonstrating the behavior. There can also be a symbolic model, which can be a person or action
portrayed in some other medium, such as television, videotape, computer programs.

Behaviors that can be learned through modeling


Many behaviors can be learned, at least partly, through modeling. Examples that can be cited are, students
can watch parents read, students can watch the demonstrations of mathematics problems, or see someone
act bravely in a fearful situation. Aggression can be learned through models. Research indicates that
children become more aggressive when they observed aggressive or violent models. Moral thin king and
moral behavior are influenced by observation and modeling. This includes moral judgments regarding right
and wrong which can, in part, develop through modeling.

Conditions necessary for effective modeling to occur


Bandura mentions four conditions that are necessary before an individual can successfully model the
behavior of someone else.
1. Attention – the person must first pay attention to the model.
2. Retention – the observer must be able to remember the behavior that has been observed. One way
of increasing this is using the technique of rehearsal.
3. Motor reproduction – the third condition is the ability to replicate the behavior that the model has
just demonstrated. This means that the observer has to be able to replicate the action, which could
be a problem with a learner who is not ready developmentally to replicate the action. For example,
little children have difficulty doing complex physical motion.
4. Motivation – the final necessary ingredient for modeling to occur is motivation, learners must want
to demonstrate what they have learned. Remember that since these four conditions vary among
individuals, different people will reproduce the same behavior differently.

Educational Implications of social learning theory


1. Students often learn a great deal simply by observing other people.
2. Describing the consequences of behavior can effectively increase the appropriate behaviors and
decrease inappropriate ones. This can involve discussing with learners about the rewards and
consequences of various behaviors.
3. Modeling provides an alternative to shaping for teaching new behaviors. Instead of using
shaping, which is operant conditioning, modeling can provide a faster, more efficient means
for teaching new behavior. To promote effective modeling, a teacher must make sure that the
four essential conditions exist; attention, retention, motor reproduction, and motivation.
4. Teachers and parents must model appropriate behaviors and take care that they do not model
inappropriate behaviors.
5. Teachers should expose students to a variety of other models. This technique is especially
important to break down traditional stereotypes.

CONSTRUCTIVIST (CONSTRUCTIVISM)
What is meant by constructivism? The term refers to the idea that learners construct knowledge for
themselves---each learner individually (and socially) constructs meaning---as he or she learns.
Constructing meaning is learning; there is no other kind. The dramatic consequences of this view are
twofold;

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 15 | 24


1) We have to focus on the learner in thinking about learning (not on the subject/lesson to be
taught):
2) There is no knowledge independent of the meaning attributed to experience (constructed)
by the learner, or community of learners.

Advance Organizer

Constructivism

Views of Characteristics of
Organizing Knowledge
Constructivism Constructivism

Individual
Constructivism

Social Constructivism

In this quotation, “filling up the pail” is more


linked to rote learning and behaviorism. It
connotes that teaching is dominated by the
teacher and the learners are passive receivers of
knowledge. “Lighting the fire” is related to the
cognitive perspective and constructivism. It
signifies that teaching involves giving
opportunities for learners to explore and
discover. Learners construct their own meaning.
Learners generate insights and are “enlightened”.
Two Views of Constructivism
Individual Constructivism. This is also called cognitive constructivism. It emphasizes individual,
internal construction of knowledge. It is largely based on Piaget’s theory. Proponents of this type choose
child-centered and discovery learning. They believe the learners should be allowed to discover principles
through their own exploration rather than direct instruction by the teacher.
Social Constructivism. This view emphasizes that “knowledge exists in a social context and is initially
shared with others instead of being represented solely in the mind of an individual.” It is based on
Vygotsky’s theory. Here, construction of knowledge is shared by two or more people. According to social
constructivists, the opportunity to interact and share among learners help to shape and refine their
knowledge construction becomes social, not individual.
Characteristics of Constructivism
Whether one takes the individual or social view of constructivism, there are four characteristics that these
two views have in common. According to Eggen and Kauchak, these are:

1. Learners construct understanding. As discussed earlier, constructivists do not view learners as


just empty vessels waiting to be filled up. They see learners as active thinkers who interpret new
information based on what they already know. They construct knowledge in a way that make sense
to them.
2. New learning depends on current understanding. Background inform is very important. It is
through the present view or scheme that the learner has that new information will be interpreted.
Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 16 | 24
3. Learning is facilitated by social interaction. Constructivists believe in creating a “community of
learners” within classrooms. Learning communities help learners take responsibility for their own
learning. Learners have a lot of opportunities to cooperate and collaborate to solve problems and
discover things. Teachers play the role of a facilitator rather than an expert who has all the
knowledge.
4. Meaningful learning occurs within authentic learning tasks. An authentic task is one that
involves a learning activity that involves constructing knowledge and understanding that is so akin
to the knowledge and understanding needed when applied in the real world. Example, a writing
activity where six-year olds prepare a checklist of things they need to do in school is a more an
authentic activity than for them to be working only on tracing worksheets with dotted lines.
Organizing Knowledge
Concepts. A concept is a way of grouping or categorizing objects or events in our mind. A concept of
“teach” includes a group of tasks such as model, discuss, illustrate, explain, assist, etc. In your life as a
student you would learn thousands of concepts, some simple ones, and other more complicated that may
take you to learn them more gradually. The concepts you learn are also revised as you learn more and
experience more.

• Concepts as Feature Lists. Learning a concept involves learning specific features that characterize
positive instance of the concept. Included here are defining features and correlational feature. A
defining feature is a characteristic present in ALL instances. Example, a triangle has three sides.
Having three sides is a defining feature of a triangle because ALL triangles should have three sides.
If one doesn’t then it is not a triangle. A correlational feature is one that is present in many
positive instances but not essential for concept membership. For example, a mother is loving. Being
loving is a feature commonly present in the concept of a mother. But a mother may not be loving.
So “being loving” is only a correlational feature, not a defining one.
• Concepts as Prototypes. A prototype is an idea or a visual image of a “typical” example. It is
usually formed based on the positive instances that learners encounter most often. Example, close
your eyes now and for a moment think of a cat. Picture in mind what it looks like. You probably
thought of an image of the common car we see, rather than some rare breed or species. Once
learners have their own concept of prototypes, the new examples that they see are checked against
this existing prototype.
• Concepts as Exemplars. Exemplars represent a variety if examples. It allows learners to know that
an example under a concept may have variability. Example, a learner’s concept of vegetable may
include a variety of different examples like cauliflower, kangkong, cabbage, string beans, squash,
corn, potatoes. When he encounters a new type of vegetable like “bitsuelas”, he would search from
the exemplars he knows and looks for one that is most similar, like string beans.
Making Concept-learning Effective. As a future teacher, you can help students learn concepts by doing
the following:

• Provide a clear definition of the concept


• Make the definition features very concrete and prominent
• Give a variety of positive instances
• Give negative instances
• Cite a “best example” or a prototype
• Provide opportunity for learners to identify positive and negative instances
• Ask learners to think of their own example of the concept
• Point out how concepts can be related to each other
Schemas and scripts. A schema is an organized body of knowledge about something. It is like a file of
information you hold in your mind about something. Like a schema of what a teacher is. A script is a
schema that includes a series of predictable events about a specific activity. Examples would include
knowing the series of steps done when we visit a doctor, or what transpires at the beginning of the class
when the teacher arrives.
Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 17 | 24
Your role as a teacher is to bring learners to construct their own knowledge such that they have a well-
organized set of concepts, aim to make clear those concepts that are still vague for them, and to pave the
way for them to overcome misconceptions. It is important that you acquire skills on how to facilitate
concept formation and development. Constructivism can be an excellent guide for you.

Applying constructivism in facilitating learning

• Aim to make learners understand a few key ideas in an in-depth manner, rather than taking u so
many topics superficially.
• Give varied examples.
• Provide opportunities for experimentation.
• Provide lots of opportunities for quality interaction.
• Have lots of hands-on activities.
• Relate your topic to real life situations.
• Do not depend on the explanation method all the time.

COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE
Gestalt psychology was at the forefront of the cognitive psychology. It served as the foundation of the
cognitive perspective to learning. It opposed the external and mechanistic focus of behaviorism. It
considered the mental processes and products of perception.

Advance Organizer
Gestalt Psychology

Gestalt Principles Lifespace (Lewin)


Insight Learning

Law of Proximity Inner Forces

Law of closure Outer Forces

Law of closure

Law of closure

Law of closure

Gestalt theory was the initial cognitive response to behaviorism. It emphasized the importance of sensory
wholes and the dynamic nature of visual perception. The term gestalt means “form” or “configuration.”
Psychologists Max Wertheimer, Wolfgang Kohler and Kurt Koffka studied perception and concluded
that perceivers (or learners) are not passive, but rather active. They suggested that learners do not just collect
information as is but they actively process and restructure data in order to understand it. This is the
perceptual process. Certain factors impact on this perceptual process. Factors like past experiences, needs,
attitudes and one’s present situation can affect their perception.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 18 | 24


Max Wolfgang Kohler Wertheimer Kurt Koffka 1887-
1887-1967 1941
1880-1943

Gestalt Principles
Law of Proximity.
Elements that are closer
together will be perceived as coherent objective. On the left, there
appears to be four columns, while on the right, there appears to be four
horizontal rows. When objects we are perceiving are near each other, we
perceive them as belonging together.
Law of Similarity. Elements that look similar will be perceived as part of the same form. There
seems to be a triangle in the square. We link similar elements together.

Law of Closure. We tend to fill the gaps or “close” the figures


we perceive.
We close a space by completing a contour and ignoring gaps in
the figure.

Law of Good Continuation. Individuals have the tendency to


continue contours whenever the elements of the pattern establish
an implied direction. People tend to draw a good continuous line.

Law of Good Pragnanz. The stimulus will be organized into as


good a figure as possible. In this example, good refers to
symmetry, simplicity and regularity. Based on our experiences
with perception, we “expect” certain patterns and therefore
perceive that expected pattern.

Law of Figure/Ground. We tend to pay attention and perceive


things in the foreground first. A stimulus will be perceived as
separate from its ground.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 19 | 24


Insight Learning
Gestalt psychology adheres to the idea of learning taking place by discovery or insight. The idea of insight
learning was first developed by Wolfgang Kohler in which he described experiments with apes where the
apes could use boxes and sticks as tools to solve problems. In the box problem, a banana is attached to the
top of a chimpanzee’s cage. The banana is out of reach but can be reached by climbing on and jumping
from a box. Only one Kohler’s apes (Sultan) could solve this problem. A much more difficult problem
which involved the stacking of boxes was introduced by Kohler. This problem required the ape to stable
stack. Kohler also gave the apes sticks which they used to rake food into the cage. Sultan, Kohler’s very
intelligent ape, was able to master a two-stick problem by inserting one stick into the end of the other in
order to reach the food. In each of these problems, the important aspect of learning was not
reinforcement, but the coordination of thinking to create new organizations (of materials). Kohler
referred to this behavior as insight or discovery learning.

Gestalt Principles and the Teaching-Learning Process


The six gestalt principles not only influence perception but they also impact on learning. Other
psychologists like Kurt Lewin expounded on Gestalt psychology. His theory focusing on “lifespace”
adhered to gestalt psychology. He said that an individual has inner and outer forces that affect his
perceptions and also his learning. Inner forces include his own motivation, attitudes, and feelings. Outer
forces may include the attitude and behavior of the teacher and classmates. All these forces interact and
impact on the person’s learning.

EXPERIANTIALISM

Learning by doing. This is the basis for the experiential learning theory. Experiential learning
focuses on the idea that the best ways to learn things is by actually having experiences. Those experiences
then stick out in your mind and help you retain information and remember facts.
David Kolb is best known for his work on the experiential learning theory or ELT. Kolb published
this model in 1984, getting his influence from other great theorists including John Dewey, Kurt Lewin, and
Jean Piaget. The experiential learning theory works in four stages—concrete learning, reflective
observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. The first two stages of the cycle
involve grasping an experience, the second two focus on transforming an experience. Kolb argues that
effective learning is seen as the learner goes through the cycle, and that they can enter into the cycle at any
time.
• Concrete learning is when a learner gets a new experience, or interprets a past experience
in a new way.
• Reflective observation comes next, where the learner reflects on their experience
personally. They use the lens of their experience and understanding to reflect on what this
experience means.
• Abstract conceptualization happens as the learner forms new ideas or adjusts their
thinking based on the experience and their reflection about it.
• Active experimentation is where the learner applies the new ideas to the world around
them, to see if there are any modifications to be made. This process can happen over a short
period of time, or over a long span of time.

Kolb went on to explain that learners will have their own preferences for how they enter the cycle
of experiential learning, and that these preferences boil down to a learning cycle.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 20 | 24


Kolb's experiential learning cycle model.
The experiential learning cycle rests on the idea that each person has a specific type of learning
tendencies, and they are thus dominant in certain stages of experiential learning. For example, some learners
will be more dominant in concrete learning and reflective observation, while others will be dominant in
abstract conceptualization and active experimentation.

The four learning styles are:


1. Diverging. The diverging learning style is full of learners who look at things with a unique
perspective. They want to watch instead of do, and they also have a strong capacity to imagine.
These learners usually prefer to work in groups, have broad interests in cultures and people, and
more. They usually focus on concrete learning and reflective observation, wanting to observe and
see the situation before diving in.
2. Assimilating. This learning style involves learners getting clear information. These learners prefer
concepts and abstracts to people, and explore using analytic models. These learners focus on
abstract conceptualization and reflective observation in the experiential learning style.
3. Converging. Converging learners solve problems. They apply what they’ve learned to practical
issues, and prefer technical tasks. They are also known to experiment with new ideas, and their
learning focuses on abstract conceptualization and active experimentation.
4. Accommodating: These learners prefer practicality. They enjoy new challenges and use intuition
to help solve problems. These learners utilize concrete learning and active experimentation when
they learn.

Experiential learning examples.


There are many ways that experiential learning is used every day. Some examples include:
• Going to the zoo to learn about animals through observation, instead of reading about them.
• Growing a garden to learn about photosynthesis instead of watching a movie about it.
• Hoping on a bicycle to try and learn to ride, instead of listening to your parent explain the concept

Benefits of experiential learning.


There are many benefits of experiential learning for teachers and students, including:
• Opportunity to immediately apply knowledge. Experiential learning can allow students to
immediately apply things they are learning to real-world experiences. This helps them retain the
information better.

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 21 | 24


• Promotion of teamwork. Experiential learning often involves working in a team, so learning in this
setting allows students to practice teamwork.
• Improved motivation. Students are more motivated and excited about learning in experiential
settings. Experiments are exciting and fun for students, and they will be passionate about learning.
• Opportunity for reflection. Students using the experiential model are able to spend time reflecting
about what they are experiencing and learning. This is valuable as they are able to better retain
information when they can think about what’s happening to them.
• Real world practice. Students can greatly benefit from learning that helps them prepare for the real
world. Experiential learning is focused on using real situations to help students learn, so they are
then better prepared for their future.

Take Note!

REMEMBER:

Learning is a change and modification in behavior.

How Far Have We Gone?


Summarize the five (5) learning theories and their impacts to EPP teaching using the table below:
Behaviorism Constructivism Social Cognitivism Experientialism
Learning
Knowledge is:
Learning is:
Focus of
learning is on:
Key learning
concept:
Centered on:
EPP teaching
impacts

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 22 | 24


Walk the Extra Mile!
Choose 3 key concepts of Bandura’s social learning theory then state how you will apply these
concepts when you teach. Use the table below for this purpose.

3 Key Concepts of Albert Bandura How I will apply it in my teaching


1. 1.1
1.2
2. 2.1
2.2
3. 3.1
3.2

REFERENCES
https://tarunagoel.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-we-need-
learningtheories.html
https://www.exploratorium.edu/education/ifi/constructivist-learning
https://www.wgu.edu/blog/experiential-learning-theory2006.html

Edukasyong Pantahanan at PangKabuhayan with Entrepreneurship (CC18) 23 | 24

You might also like