SANRAL Reponses 1 PDF
SANRAL Reponses 1 PDF
SANRAL Reponses 1 PDF
1] Could SANRAL kindly indicate why it decided to appoint the CCCC-MECSA JV, despite what appears to
be very clear warning signs contained in that DBSA BEC report? Is SANRAL saHsfied or confident that
the CCCC-MECSA JV will be able to successfully conclude this project without running into dire financial
difficulHes?
SANRAL approved the appointment of CCCC-MECSA based on the recommendaCon made by DBSA BAC
aFer following the procurement prescripts. SANRAL also based its decision on the SANRAL and DBSA
Internal Audit and Legal proacCve assurance reports. At any rate, SANRAL makes its decisions based on
informaCon at its disposal at the Cme the tender is evaluated and adjudicated.
SANRAL has proper project management throughout the implementaCon of the project to ensure its
success. In addiCon to the SANRAL project management team, DBSA has also been appointed to
provide project management oversight.
2] Another concern, as highlighted in the DBSA report, involves the number of days, on average, that the
CCCC takes to seOle its invoices/bills from sub-contractors or service providers. The report shows that the
CCCC in 2021 took a full seven months to seOle such bills. If they conHnue this trend while execuHng the
Mtentu Bridge project, the JV’s South African sub-contractors and service providers will no doubt face
severe liquidity issues if the JV does take that long to seOle their invoices. Does this not concern SANRAL?
How will SANRAL ensure that South African suppliers/sub-contractors are not disadvantaged in such a
way?
As indicated above, the SANRAL project management team working with DBSA, will use the risk
assessment results to manage the delivery of the project adequately and appropriately Moreover,
SANRAL has its own Project Management standard operaCng procedures, which ensures that
contractors perform in accordance with the signed contract. Specifically, SANRAL pays its suppliers
and contractors within 30 days from receipt of an invoice and ensures that subcontractors are also
paid within the same Cmelines. Any default by a contractor will be managed through contractual
provisions.
3] Could SANRAL describe what the DBSA’s role was in these tender processes? Why did SANRAL rope in
the DBSA to oversee these bids/tenders?
On 30 June 2022, the Minister of Transport, Fikile Mbalula, and the SANRAL Board announced that
an agreement had been reached with the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) to act as
the infrastructure procurement and delivery management support agency on the five strategic
projects whose awards the Board had declined to approve. There had been lapses in the iniCal
procurement process that was carried out by SANRAL and hence the DBSA was approached to
carry to manage the process.
The SANRAL Board Chairperson, Mr Themba Mhambi, at that Cme said: “It must be noted that the
DBSA was not in any way involved in the design, cost esCmaCon and tender documentaCon stages
of the cancelled tenders. This should reassure all interested parCes and the public about the
integrity and independence of the new procurement processes for the projects. DBSA’s profile and
record in regard to ma[ers of this nature speaks for itself.”
The scope of the services to be rendered by the DBSA included the evaluaCon of compliance,
technical and financial aspects of relevant tenders, as well as providing independent construcCon
management oversight throughout the construcCon period of the projects emanaCng from the
tenders.
The procurement phase of the idenCfied projects was characterised by, inter alia, the following key
stages or acCviCes, the establishment of the required team, a review of tender documents prior to
the invitaCon of bids, submission of the tender documents for relevant approval, the invitaCon of
bids, the management and handling of tender briefing sessions, the opening and recording of bids
received, the determinaCon of the completeness or incompleteness of the bids, the determinaCon
of the responsiveness of the bids, the evaluaCon of the bids, risk analysis, development of bid
evaluaCon and adjudicaCon reports, recommendaCon of bidders for appointment, and awarding
of the tenders. All the above procurement phases were subjected to probity checks.