5.12 CALCULATING AND INTERPRETING RISK RATIOS. Refer To The Financial Statement Data For Hasbro in Problem 4.23
5.12 CALCULATING AND INTERPRETING RISK RATIOS. Refer To The Financial Statement Data For Hasbro in Problem 4.23
5.12 CALCULATING AND INTERPRETING RISK RATIOS. Refer To The Financial Statement Data For Hasbro in Problem 4.23
5.12 CALCULATING AND INTERPRETING RISK RATIOS. Refer to the financial statement data for Hasbro in Problem 4.23
in Chapter 4. Exhibit 5.15 presents risk ratios for Hasbro for Year 2 and Year 3.
Page 1 of 14
B. Assess the changes in the short-term liquidity risk of Hasbro between Year 2 and Year 4 and the level of that risk
at the end of Year 4.
All liquidity suggests that the short term debt ability risk is low except for year 4 for the ratio operating cash to current
liabilities it’s below 40% Company is secure
C. Assess the changes in the long-term solvency risk of Hasbro between Year 2 and Year 4 and the level of that risk at
the end of Year 4.
The long term solvency risk is low has decreased significantly during the 3 year period. Debt level decline as the Co. has
redeemed debt interest coverage ratio in year 4 increase to a very healthy level because of reduction in borrowing and
increase in net income
Page 2 of 14
5.14 INTERPRETING RISK RATIOS. Refer to the profitability ratios of CocaCola in Problem 4.25 in Chapter 4. Exhibit
5.17 presents risk ratios for Coca-Cola for 2006- 2008. As we did within the chapter for PepsiCo, we utilize Coca-Cola’s
footnote disclosures to extract the amount of trade accounts payable included within the line item accounts payable
and accrued expenses.
A. Assess the changes in the short-term liquidity risk of Coca-Cola between 2006 and 2008.
Coca Cola’s short – term liquidity risk is now and did not changed significantly during the three – year period. It current
ratio is just below I , and its quick ratio is below 0.6 but has remained steady over the past three years. The operating
cash flow to current liabilities ratio been decreasing , but it remain above the desired level of 40%. This is not too
worrisome given that the firm has a demonstrated ability to sell products for considerably more than their book value .
b. Assess the changes in the long-term solvency risk of Coca-Cola between 2006 and 2008.
Coca Cola’s long – term solvency risk decreased during the three – year period. Its debt ratio generally declined
particularly its long – term debt ratio. Operating cash flow to total liabilities and interest coverage ratio decreased , but
are still above a desired level due to Coca Cola’s profitability. The level of long – term solvency risk is still low .
c. Compare the short-term liquidity ratios of Coca-Cola with those of PepsiCo discussed in the chapter. Which firm
appears to have more short-term liquidity risk? Explain.
Coca Cola’s appears to have slightly more short-term risk compared to pepsi co. , but neither company has much risk
in this regard .
Page 3 of 14
D. Compare the long-term solvency ratios of Coca-Cola with those of PepsiCo discussed in the chapter. Which firm
appears to have more long-term solvency risk? Explain.
Neither pepsi co. nor Coca Cola’s displays much long-term solvency risk. However , long-term solvency risk than Coca
Cola due primarily to higher proportions of long-term debt.
Page 4 of 14
5.15 COMPUTING AND INTERPRETING RISK AND BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION RATIOS FOR A FIRM THAT DECLARED
BANKRUPTCY. Delta Air Lines is one of the largest airlines in the United States. It has operated on the verge of
bankruptcy for several years. Exhibit 5.18 presents selected financial data for Delta Air Lines for each of the five years
ending December 31, 2000, to December 31, 2004. Delta Air Lines filed for bankruptcy on September 14, 2005. We
recommend that you create an Excel spreadsheet to compute the values of the ratios and the Altman’s Z-score in Parts
a and b, respectively
EXHIBIT 5.18 Financial Data for Delta Air Lines (amounts in millions except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31: 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
Sales $15,002 $14,087 $13,866 $13,879 $15,657
Net Income (Loss) before Interest and Taxes $ (3,168) $ (432) $ (1,337) $(1,365) $ 1,829
Interest Expense $ 824 $ 757 $ 665 $ 499 $ 380
Net Income (Loss) $(5,198) $ (773) $ (1,272) $(1,216) $ 828
Current Assets $ 3,606 $ 4,550 $ 3,902 $ 3,567 $ 3,205
Total Assets $21,801 $25,939 $24,720 $23,605 $21,931
Current Liabilities $ 5,941 $ 6,157 $ 6,455 $ 6,403 $ 5,245
Long-Term Debt $12,507 $11,040 $ 9,576 $ 7,781 $ 5,797
Total Liabilities $27,320 $26,323 $23,563 $19,581 $16,354
Retained Earnings (Deficit) $ (4,373) $ 844 $ 1,639 $ 2,930 $ 4,176
Shareholders’ Equity $ (5,519) $ (384) $ 1,157 $ 4,024 $ 5,577
Cash Flow Provided by Operations $ (1,123) $ 142 $ 225 $ 236 $ 2,898
Common Shares Outstanding 139.8 123.5 123.4 123.2 123.0
Market Price per Share $ 7.48 $ 11.81 $ 12.10 $ 29.26 $ 50.18
Page 5 of 14
STARBUCKS
Exhibit presents risk ratios for Starbucks for 2006 and 2007. Exhibits and in Chapter 1 present the financial statements for
Starbucks.
Required
a. Compute the values of each of the ratios in Exhibit 5.26 for Starbucks for 2008. Starbucks had 735.5 million
common shares outstanding at the end of 2008, and the market price per share was $14.17. For days accounts
receivable, use only specialty revenues in your calculations, because accounts receivable are primarily related to
licensing and food service operations, not the retail operations. Use cost of sales, including occupancy costs, in the
numerator of the GMI in the Beneish earnings manipulation model.
b. Interpret the changes in Starbucks risk ratios during the three-year period, indicating areas of concern.
Page 6 of 14
A)
Page 7 of 14
Page 8 of 14
B)
Short-term solvency:
From the above calculations, it is clear that there is a increase in short-term solvency risk, the current ratio of the
company fell below 1.0 and the quick ratio will be above 0.30 in 2008. Both these ratios have decreased in the three
year period of time. The same downward trend is noticed in operating cash flow to current liabilities. Similarly, the
days of accounts payable has decreased which may be a reason for the decrease in the cash balance. There is a
considerable decrease in the marketable securities which is declining the short-term liquidity.
Long-term solvency:
The total liabilities have also increased during the given three year period of time and also the long-term debt ratio has
also increased. There is increase in the current liabilities. There is a drastic decrease in the interest coverage ratio and
operating cash flow to total liabilities ratio. They are still in the healthy level. Company started to carry the long-term
debt in 2007.These debt do not include those amount pertains to the operating leases. If these expenses are included
the long-term debt will increase further.
Page 9 of 14
Chapter 6
Page 10 of 14
Chapter 12
2011 2010
A 100.2 % 99.8%
This firm is having profit problem Expenses have increased faster than revenue
B 76.7% 75%
This frim is using more debt in absolute terms and in relation to operating property
C 170.96% 171.67%
The ratio remained constant
$0.085
D 8.1
8.5 per mile
The firm is generating more revenue per passenger mile , but it suffering from a serious decline in
passenger miles .
Page 11 of 14
A)
B)
C)
Cash flow per share has increased much more than EPS .
This would be considered to be positive .
Page 12 of 14
A. 5 B. 3 C.4 D.3 E.5 F.4
Page 13 of 14
A)
B)
1. It has increased , indicating that management has improved in putting bank asset to work .
2. The ratio has increased , indicating improvement in profitability
3. The ratio has increased , indicating an improved level of protection of loans
4. The ratio has increased , indicating an improved cushion against the risk of using debt and leverage
5. Increase , indicating increased risk
6. Increase , indicating a prospect of higher return to shareholders
Page 14 of 14