Intersubjectivity PDF
Intersubjectivity PDF
Intersubjectivity PDF
-
High School
Introduction to the
Philosophy of the
Human Person
Quarter 2 – Module 2
Week 3 & 4
Intersubjectivity
1
Quarter 2 – Module 2 (Week 3 & 4)
Intersubjectivity
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work of
the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency
or office wherein the work is created shall be necessary for the exploitation of such work
for a profit. Such agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the
payment of royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright
holders. Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these
materials from their respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not
represent nor claim ownership over them.
Editors / Reviewers:
John Paul D. Lesondato, Senior Education Program Specialist
Gerlie N. Alberio, MT1, Abellana National School
Management Team:
RHEA MAR A. ANGTUD, EdD
Schools Division Superintendent
2
Quarter 2 - Module 2 – Week 2 (Week 3 & 4)
Intersubjectivity
Quarter : Second Quarter
Truly, we are all unique individuals. Most of the time, we look at our
differences and may have "labels" toward one another. You can be a "misfit," a
"loner," a "partygoer," or "easy-go-lucky." In our lives, somehow, we have collected
and given labels ourselves toward others.
Though we are part of our society, we are still different individuals living
in this society. Each of us will have different appearances or points of view. This
chapter focuses on building strength despite our differences.
Intersubjectivity
2. Create either a brochure, a poster, or a collage to feature only one (1) PWD
or any individual from the marginalized sectors in the barangay.
3
3. Write a graphic organizer with four boxes filled out with four people
whom one is having a genuine relationship.
What I Know
MULTIPLE CHOICE: Choose the letter that best corresponds to your answer and use
a separate sheet of paper for your answers.
2.The social dimension of “We relation” to view the human person as total, not dual
belongs to ______.
A. Karol Wojtyla B. Martin Heidegger C. Martin Buber D. John Dewey
5. Martin Buber’s “Ich und Du” book presented a kind of relationship that is described
by mutuality, directness, presentness, intensity, and ineffability termed as _________.
A.I-You relation B. We-relation C. I-Me relation D. I-It relation
6.This is referred to as the interaction between the self and the other based on the
mutual recognition of each other as persons in a philosophical concept termed as
_______.
A. Intrasubjectivity C. Intersubjectivity
B. Radioactivity D. Plausibility
7.When asked as to how keenly aware you are of people, colors, noises, and
objects around, your response has something to do with __________.
A. Sensitivity C. Intensity
B. Persistence D. Perceptiveness
8.Born in Poland, Saint Pope John Paul II or Karol Wojtyla was an architect of
communism's demise (death) in his country. Which of the following was his
criticism of the traditional definitions of a human person contained in his
encyclical letter, “Fides et ratio”?
A. Political animal C. Rational animal
B. Social animal D. Spiritual animal
4
C. Every human person has an inner life of interiority which allows him or her
to give himself or herself to others.
D. It has the characteristic of the human person to engage in a very intimate
and personal relationship with others who are different from him or her but
who are also like him or her.
12.Which of the following is the position of Pope John Paul II about the human
person?
A. The human person is born free and good.
B. The human person exists solely for himself or herself.
C. The human person, by nature, is selfish, cruel, and nasty.
D. The human person is the one who exists and acts (conscious
acting, has a will, has self-determination).
13.For Wojtyla, action through participation reveals the nature of the person as
a human agent. Which of the following statements is a negation to this?
A. Participation explains the essence of the human person.
B. Through participation, the person can fulfill one's self.
C. The human person is a world existing only by himself or herself.
D. The human person is oriented toward relationships and sharing in the
communal life for the common good.
What’s In
5
your neighbor or anyone there near you is the other or a being that exists outside of
yourself.
We need to relate meaningfully with others because we consider ourselves as
essentially the same. This notion (idea) of recognizing the self in the other is how
philosophers define interpersonal relations. Intersubjectivity arises due to the
interaction between the self (your self) and the other. You and others must have
“shared” knowledge or “shared” emotions such as grief, joy, and love.
A deeper level of interaction between the self and the other is your awareness of
the self as being seen by others. This happens when others, strangers, for instance,
are looking in your direction. Imagine if someone close to you is doing as the stranger
does. Did the stranger or your friend have the same thoughts of who you are?
Also, the self in the other is an important element of interpersonal interactions.
The way we act with other people is often influenced by our ideas of how these people
see us. Therefore, if we have the idea that our parents think of us as compassionate,
helpful, or obedient, we often act that way with them. When our friends see us as
outgoing and boisterous, we adjust our behavior to conform with how we think they
expect us to act. Now, is this true in the social context that your behavior is different from
the way you behave at a lively party?
Instructions: Mark check (√) on Columns 2 - 6 on who among the types of people
where the questions on Column 1 are often asked or said to you. After checking, indicate
the name(s) to specify. This activity is worth twenty (20) points based on the “perceived
sincerity” of your responses. Number 1 is done for you as an example. Use a separate
sheet of paper for your answers.
6
GUIDE QUESTIONS:
1. As you checked the questions and look into who among were able to ask or said
this to you, what sets apart the people whom you are close to from the casual
acquaintances in your life?
2. Are there people that you consider the easiest to relate to? Whom do you find
difficult to get along with?
3. What does “having” a meaningful relationship with others mean to you?
Guide Questions:
1. Is your mother, the other “self” or a being that exists outside of your “self?”
2. Is your charger, the other “self” or a thing that exists outside of your “self?”
3. Which, between your mother and charger, is more reasonable to interact with?
4. Which of the two statements above describes a logical human act?
What’s New
LABELING
7
If the negative labels can be contagious, so can the positive ones. Let us
focus on the positive, for these labels can strengthen not just your relation ships
among your friends, but most especially with your family.
Instead of labeling, endeavor yourself to a deeper and more genuine
interaction with others through dialogue. Dialogue happens when the self realizes
that the other is a genuine and unique individual. When two individuals begin to
view each other as an “other”, that is, truly acknowledging each other’s existence
– then that is the beginning of an authentic relationship and dialogue. Most human
interactions should not be based on deception since we strive to uphold our and
others’ dignity and goodness, such that our interactions are always geared toward
what is good and beneficial.
Instructions: Use a separate sheet of paper for your answers. Kindly assess your
temperament by putting a checkmark (√) after the highlighted words on the box by using
the scale of 1-4 below. This activity is worth twenty-five (25) points.
4 3 2 1
1. Loyalty. Is betraying others’ trust and confidence inimical to
genuine relationships?
2. Persistence. If you are involved in an activity, would you
endeavor to pursue it despite some initial setbacks or failures?
3. Sensitivity. Do you consider others’ emotions or their
unique differences from yours?
4. Perceptiveness. Are you keenly aware of people’s attitude or
their thoughts?
5. Adaptability. Do you quickly adjust to situations like
meeting new faces, new challenges, or the new distance
learning system?
6. Energy. Do you always exhibit a life of vigor in all things that
you do?
7. First Reaction. How do you usually react to new places,
people, or any activity?
8. Approachability. Are you a person who can be easily
reached out to?
9. Intensity. How strong are your emotional reactions? Do
you find yourself becoming easily upset or indifferent?
10. Empathy. Do you always put yourself in the shoes of others
when the latter are on grief, pain, or stress?
8
What is It
For both views, the human person is total, not dual. For Wojtyla, the social
dimension is represented by 'We relation' and for Buber, the interpersonal is
signified by the 'I-You relation.'
Martin Buber is a Jewish existentialist philosopher.
He was born in Vienna and was brought up in the Jewish
tradition. In his work l and Thou (Ich and Du) (1923), he
conceives the human person in his/her wholeness, totality,
concrete existence, and relatedness to the world. Martin Buber
Saint Pope John Paul II or Karol Wojtyla was born in
Wadowice, Poland. He was elected to the Papacy on October
16, 1978 (264th pope) and was considered a great pope
(88%) during his lifetime. He was also an architect of
Communism's demise in Poland. In his encyclical letter,
Fides et ratio, criticized the traditional definition of the
human as a "rational animal.” He mai ntains that the
human person is th e one who exists and acts (conscious
acting, has a will, has self-determination).
For Wojtyla, action reveals the nature of the human
Pope John Paul
agent. Participation explains the essence of the human
person. Through participation, the person can fulfill one's self. The human person
is oriented toward relationships and sharing in the communal life for the common
good. As St. Augustine of Hippo said, "No human being should become an end to
him/herself. We are responsible to our neighbors as we are to our actions.”
9
We participate in the communal life (We). Our notion of the "neighbor" and
"fellow member" is by participating in the humanness of the other person (I -You).
The neighbor takes into account humanness.
A person “I” endeavors himself or herself to participate in the work of the
community (say, barangay where people live). The “I” here merges as one with the
people, “We”, in the barangay to become united through involvement in civic works
like the proper disposal of garbage or greening the community by planting trees. This
is the “I-We” relation.
Martin Buber's I-thou philosophy is about the human person as a subject,
who is a being different from things or objects. The human person experiences his
wholeness, not in virtue of his relation to one's self, but virtu e of his relation to
another self. The human person establishes the world of mutual relation, of
experience.
The human persons as subjects have direct and mutual sharing of selves.
This signifies a person-to-person, subject-to-subject relation or acceptance,
sincerity, concern, respect, dialog, and care. The human person is not just
being-in-the-world but being-with-others, or being-in-relation.
A person “I” engages the other person/s “Thou or You” in meaningful human
interactions. The person here feels the feeling of the passing (death) of his or her
friend’s parent. This is empathy, that is, a person is putting himself or herself in
the shoes of the other-self. This is the “I-Thou” relation.
In contrast, to the realm of meeting and dialog, Buber cites the I-It
relationship. This I-It relationship is a person to a thing, subject to an object
that is merely experiencing and using; lacking directedness and mutuality
(feeling, knowing, and acting).
A person “I” is treating his or her neighbor, not as a person but as a thing or
object “It”, when that person only uses that neighbor for his or her interests. Or when
you disrespect, shame, or cast aspersions on his or her personality, this is the “I-It”
relation.
Simplifying Wojtyla’s “I-We” and Buber’s “I-You” relations can be in the context
of a self to another through the pursuit and achievement of genuine relationships
to attain development. The human person is considered as a “being with others,”
which means that his or her identity and destiny are shaped by relating with others.
Human existence is a continual dialogue with the other, and that the self
becomes whole through interaction with the other people and his or her
surroundings.
Empathy, or the ability to share emotions, is an important aspect of
intersubjectivity. This emotion is driven by a person’s awareness that the other is a
person with thoughts and feelings. Empathy enables us to experience another
person’s emotions, such as their happiness, their anger, and their sadness. To
differentiate, sympathy is “feeling with” and empathy is “feeling in.” For instance,
10
how would you react to a friend who just informed you of his or her mother’s death?
Empathy enables you to not only share your friend’s grief but also feel the grief of
that person even if it wasn’t your own relative’s death.
Is empathy the basis of genuine friendship? Are you “feeling in” the feelings of your
true friend? Is his or her joy, yours too? Does his or her feeling of sadness become
yours as well?
Availability, or the willingness of a person to be present and be at the disposal
of another, is another aspect of intersubjectivity. You may have encountered a
situation where you needed help. For instance, you went to an unfamiliar place and
cannot locate the place where you are supposed to go.
Will you ask for directions from people living in the area? What if those asked kept
ignoring you? What if a stranger instead approaches you in the street asking for help,
what will be your first reaction? Will you help or ignore that person instead?
Can you put yourself in the shoes of frail and blind old persons, persons with
disabilities, abused women, and abandoned children?
Is this the “I-It relation”, where you view the other person only as an object? When
you shame or treat others with disrespect, aren’t you equating them to things?
Have you heard of the term “matapobre”, used to describe well-off people who
look down on others? How about watching a customer berating the serving staff and
even insulting them for committing a mistake? How did you feel when you
encountered these situations? Our human nature drives us to feel indignation
against these kinds of behavior as these are an insult to human dignity. Alienation
goes against the concept of personhood because this view discounts the humanity
and dignity of a person and leads to dehumanization.
How did you feel when you encountered these situations? Don’t you feel indignant
about these kinds of behavior?
11
ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER’S DIFFERENCE AND EMBRACING DIVERSITY
1. Stephen Hawking, one of the most well-known physicists in the world, was
diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), a progressive nervous
system disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, causing loss
of muscle control. He spoke with the assistance of a computer in the later years of
his life and was a full-time powerchair user since the 1980s. He was best
remembered for his in-depth studies of the universe, specifically the framework of
general relativity and quantum mechanics.
2. Roselle Ambubuyog became the first visually-impaired Filipina to emerge as a
summa cum laude graduate of the Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU).
3. Andrea Bocelli, an Italian opera tenor, and multi-instrumentalist, was diagnosed
with congenital glaucoma at 5 months old, and became completely blind at age 12,
following a football accident. Have you heard his “The Prayer” with Celine Dion?
4. Stevie Wonder, the legendary musician, singer-songwriter, was born blind, due to
being six weeks premature and the blood vessels at the back of his eyes not having
yet reached maturation. Have you heard him sing “I Just Called to Say I Love You”
and “Lately?”
5.Nicholas James Vujicic is an Australian American Christian
evangelist and motivational speaker born with tetra-amelia syndrome, a rare
disorder characterized by the absence of arms and legs.
6. Helen Keller, an American author, political activist, and lecturer, was the first deaf
and blind person to earn a Bachelor of Arts degree. Her story was famously
portrayed in the play and film, “The Miracle Worker”.
7. John Forbes Nash Jr., a 1994 Nobel Prize laureate for Economics, was an American
mathematician who made fundamental contributions to game theory, differential
geometry, and the study of partial differential equations. In 1959, Nash began
12
showing clear signs of mental illness and spent several years at psychiatric
hospitals being treated for paranoid schizophrenia. His struggles with his illness
and his recovery became the basis for the film “A Beautiful Mind” starring Russell
Crowe as Nash.
8. Franklin Delano Roosevelt is considered being one of the greatest American
presidents. FDR was perhaps one of the most famous wheelchair users in history,
having contracted polio while drinking water at a campground.
9. Nonoy Zuniga, a Filipino musician, television presenter, and medical doctor is
an amputee, having lost his right leg in a bombing incident during the Martial
Law era while he was preparing for a concert. Have you heard of his “Never Ever
Say Goodbye”?
10. John Hockenberry, an American journalist and author, four-time Emmy Award
winner, and three-time Peabody Award winner, is one of the most successful
journalists in history working with a visible disability on an American network. He
was a wheelchair user due to a spinal cord injury.
What’s More
Instructions: Write your answer on a separate sheet of paper. Write T if the statement
is true, and F it is false.
Instructions: Read the given questions below and answer them comprehensively. The
bases for the rating are given below. Use a separate sheet of paper for your answers in
statement form for each item.
Criteria for grading
Conform to the content of ideas – 3 pts.
Organization of thoughts - 2 pts.
Total =5points
13
1. Describe the I-It relationship compared to I-You. Cite examples.
2. How do you define "existence"?
3. What did you learn from your relationship with your parents, friends,
classmates, teachers, or neighbors?
4. Discuss the concept of intersubjectivity.
5. How does establishing “dialogue” with others benefit a person? Cite a specific
incident to whom you established a “dialogue”.
Instructions: Read the questions below and answer them based on your
perceptions and experiences. Use your old notebooks as your reflective journal. Each
item is worth five (5) points based on the criteria below.
Criteria for grading
Conformity to the content of ideas – 3 pts.
Organization of thoughts - 2 pts.
What I Can Do
Activity 7: GRAPHIC ORGANIZER
Instructions: Copy the graphic organizer on a sheet of paper then fill out names
of four people on the boxes with whom you have genuine relationships. Describe
how their contribution makes you a better person.
ME
Ee
14
Activity 8: THE PHILOSOPHER IN ME
Rubrics
3pts 4pts 5pts
Impression Output includes Output includes all Output includes all
required elements; all required elements, all
required elements as
graphics are related graphics are relatedwell as additional
to the topic. One or to the topic and make
information, all
two borrowed it easier to
graphics are related
graphics have a understand, and
to the topic and make
source citation. some borrowed
it easier to
graphics have a
understand, and all
source citation. borrowed graphics
have a source
citation.
Style The output is The output is The output is
acceptably attractive attractive in terms of exceptionally
though it may be a bit design, layout, and attractive in terms of
in disarray. neatness layout, and neatness.
15
Assessment
MULTIPLE CHOICE: Choose the letter that best corresponds to your answer and use
a separate sheet of paper for your answers.
5. Born in Poland, Saint Pope John Paul II or Karol Wojtyla was an architect
of communism's demise (death) in his country. Which of the following
was his criticism of the traditional definitions of a human person
contained in his encyclical letter, “Fides et ratio”?
A. Political animal C. Rational animal
B. Social animal D. Spiritual animal
6. Pope John Paul’s assertion that the human person is the one who
exists and acts (conscious acting, has a will, has self-determination) is
illustrative of his _______.
A. I-Thou relation C. I-It relation
B. I-We relation D. I-Me relation
16
C. The interdependence of countries in globalized economy and culture.
D. The study of the human mind as the consequence of behavior.
14.For Wojtyla, action through participation reveals the nature of the person
as a human agent. Which of the following statements is a negation to his
position?
A. Participation explains the essence of the human person.
B. Through participation, the person can fulfill one’s self.
C. The human person is a world existing only by himself or herself.
D. The human person is oriented toward relationships and sharing in the
communal life for the common good.
Additional Activity
This activity is worth fifty (50) points based on timeliness in its submission
of twenty (20) points, style of the research work of fifteen (15) points, and the
organization of thoughts of fifteen (15) points. Use separate sheets of paper for
your research.
17
REFERENCES
BOOKS:
advised.
ONLINE SOURCES:
1.T h e K a h i m y a n g P r o j e c t ( 2 0 2 1 ) . F i l i p i n a w h o e m e r g e d
s u m m a c u m l a u d e , 1-12-2021,
https://kahimyang.com/kauswagan/articles/1036/today-in-philippine-history-
march-24-2001-roselle-ambubuyog-became-the-first-visually-impaired-filipina-who-
emerged-summa-cum-laude
2. Access For All Abilities (2021). 11 Outstanding People Living With Disability, 1-
12-2021, https://www.aaavic.org.au/11-outstanding-people-living-disability
18