The Family Health Process PDF
The Family Health Process PDF
The Family Health Process PDF
HEALTH PROCESS
Prepared By:
Janeth Rose E. Toledo RN, MN
FAMILY
• First name
• Age
• Date of birth
• Occupation
• Health problems
• Cause of death
• Date of marriages, divorces, separations,
commitments
• Education level
• Ethnic or religious background
Areas essential to note in family Genogram:
● Family APGAR
- A family unit is considered by Smilkstein to be
a nurturing unit that demonstrates integrity in five
components:
• Adaptability
• Partnership
• Growth
• Affection
• Resolve
- This tool is useful in suggesting
areas to be assessed relative to family
functioning and potential areas of
family strengths and resources.
• The scores are being totaled, a score of 7 to 10
suggest a highly functional family;
4 to 6 points are moderately dysfunctional
family; and 0 to 3 points a severely dysfunctional
family.
METHODS FOR DATA
COLLATION
1. Direct observation- is done through the use of
all sensory capacities- sight, hearing, smell,
touch and taste.
The health care provider gathers information
about the family’s state of being and
behavioral responses.
2. Interview
a. Completing a health history for each
family members.
b. Collecting data by personally asking
family members or relatives questions
regarding health, family life experiences and
home environment to generate data on what
health problems exist in the family.
3. Examination- is done through inspection,
palpation, percussion, auscultation, measurement
of specific body parts and reviewing the body
system.
4. Review of records
COMPONENTS: DATA BASE
FOR FAMILY CARE
A. Family Dynamics ( family structure,
relationships, living/ strengths and resources,
age/sex, rest/sleep, diet/nutrition)
B. Socio-economic and cultural factors (
educational attainment, occupation/ income
expenses, religion, customs/ beliefs/tradition)
C. Home living and environmental condition (
housing condition, ventilation/ lighting, food
storage and cooking facility, water/ toilet
facility, refuse waste disposal, drainage
system, community facilities/ resources )
Purpose Of FCI
To provide a basis for estimating the health needs
of a particular family
COPING
Two Parts:
a. a point scale- 1 ( totally unable to manage
this aspect of family care ) to 5 ( able to
handle this aspect of care without help from
community sources)
b. a justification statement- consist of brief
statement or phrases which explains why the
health care provider have rated the family.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS:
• 1- no competence
• 3- moderate competence
• 5- complete competence
FAMILY COPING AREAS
1. Physical Independence- is concerned
with the ability to move about to get
out of bed, to take care of daily
grooming, walking, and other things
which involves the daily activities.
M. Others, specify________
III. Inability to provide adequate nursing care to sick, disabled,
dependent, or vulnerable / at risk member of the family due to:
A. Lack of / or inadequate knowledge about the disease / health
condition ( nature, severity, complications, prognosis and
management )
B. Lack of / or inadequate knowledge of child development and
care
C. Lack of / inadequate knowledge of the nature and extent of
nursing care needed
D. Lack of necessary facilities, equipment and supplies for care
E. Lack of knowledge and skill in carrying out the necessary
treatment/ procedure/ care
F. Inadequate family resources for care, specifically:
1. absence of responsible family member
2. financial constraints
3. limitations/ lack of physical resources- ex: isolation room
G. Negative attitudes towards sick, disabled, dependent, vulnerable/
at risk member
H. Philosophy in life which negates/ hinder caring for the sick,
disabled, dependent, vulnerable/ at risk member
I. Members preoccupation with own
concerns/ interests
J. Others, specify_________
• Diagnosis
Client and family may experience variety of
responses: from denial and anger to guilt.
• One of the most important task of the health care provider and
family is to assign priorities to the family health problems and
formulate goals.
1. Goals of the health care provider
2. Goals of the client/ family.
3. Preventive Potential
– The nature and magnitude of
future problems that can be minimized
or totally prevented if intervention is
done on the problem under
consideration
Scale: High 3 1
Moderate 2
Low 1
4. Salience- The family’s perception
and evaluation of the problems in
terms of seriousness and urgency
of attention needed.
Scale: A serious problem,
immediate attention needed 2
A Problem, but not needing
1
immediate attention 1
Not felt need/ problem 0
• Computations help systematize priority setting by
determining specific scores for each problem in the list.
Scoring:
1. Decide on a score for each of the criteria.
2. Divide the score by the highest possible score and multiply
by the weight
Score x Weight
Highest Score
3. Sum up the scores for all the criteria. The highest score is 5,
equivalent to the total weight.
Example of Prioritization #1
▪ Mang Pedro is 42 yrs old, has been coughing for
3 weeks and has hemoptysis. He has a history
of Tuberculosis, underwent treatment, and was
cured of PTB in 2010. His wife Aling Linda,
recognizes the need for him to undergo sputum
exam. She verbalized “Ganyan din yung
sintomas nya nung sinabi ng doktor na may TB
sya. Natatakot kami na maulit yon. Balak
naming ipatingin sya sa center sa susunod na
linggo”
Example of Prioritization #2
▪ Pedrito, 4 years old, weighs 12.5 kgs., looks pale and
noticeably underweight, as manifested by the evident
bony prominences. Aling Linda verbalized “Naku,
mahina lang kumain ang batang iyan. Palibhasa
nauubos ang oras sa paglalaro. Tsaka naisip ko, nasa
lahi naman talaga namin ang hindi tabain kaya siguro
payat din si Pedrito.” Then nurse observed that Aling
Linda gave the child a small pack of fish crackers for
his morning snack. Aling Linda is the homemaker,
while Mang Pedro earns a net income of P250 per
day as tricycle driver
PLANNING- HEALTH
ACTIONS/ CARE
• Setting goals and developing a plan of action/ activities with
the family:
1. Planned assistance
2.Tapping assistance
3. Make proper referral/ supervision
● Documentation:
1. Provides data which are needed to plan and
ensure continuity of family care.
2. Serves an important communication tool
for the health agency.
3. Furnishes evidence of quality care rendered and family’s
responses
4. Legal records for health agency
5. Provide data for research and education
● Types of Interventions:
1. Supplemental
2. Facilitative
3. Developmental
• The strategies/ Interventions must be:
1. Directly related to the needs and underlying causes of the
problems identified
2. Based on scientifically/ technically sound principles of health
promotion, disease prevention, treatment and rehabilitation
adapted to local conditions
3. Planned in terms of desired outcomes in individual/ family/ group
health and health- related behavior.
5. Evaluation
• Has a profound effect on the quality of care in family based
practice.
• It is a mutual continuous process that incorporates
reassessment, and modification of the care plan to determine
whether goals and outcome criteria were started correctly to
permit modification as circumstances change, and met
effectively.
EVALUATION OF CARE AND
SERVICES PROVIDED