Financial Institutions and Investment Management: Strictly
Financial Institutions and Investment Management: Strictly
Financial Institutions and Investment Management: Strictly
management
Assignment 02
Article review activity is designed to enable you to enhance your analytical skill by
critically reviewing journal articles, working papers and other similar scientific
works. The basic principles to which you should abide and adhere with reviewing
this article are the following. (Please note that, it does not mean this is the only
guideline for article review; rather it is given for the sake of uniformity & fair
evaluation!!)
Note:
1) The review report for an article should not exceed a maximum of 5 pages.
2) Furthermore, you should include in the information in the following order.
a) Your name and class information.
b) Full bibliographical information for the article being reviewed, according
to an accepted format (the Turabian form used by most of the humanities
disciplines is to be preferred), as in the following template (for a journal
article):
Further, consider the following points of critiques that are usually helpful when
reviewing an article:
1) Originality/Novelty/ of the study: Does the paper contain new (novel) ideas and
significant information? Is the reviewed article a study with an original scientific
contribution? Is there new gap that the article addresses?
2) Relationship to Literature: Does the paper demonstrate an adequate
understanding of the relevant literature in the field and cite an appropriate range
of literature sources? Is any significant work ignored? Is the literature research
sufficient? Does the research use a theoretical and/or conceptual model? Does
the literature review seem thorough & recent
(Within the last 5 years)? Does the content of the literature review relate directly to
the research problem? Is the review of literature relevant to the research question?
3) Methodology: Is the paper's argument built on an appropriate base of
theory, concepts, or other ideas? Has the research or equivalent intellectual
work on which the paper is based been well designed? Are the methods
employed appropriate? Are the used models and methods suitable for the
research topic and purpose? Is the used research method adequately valid
and reliable? Are the methods consistent with the theory? Were the
inclusion/exclusion criteria specified for subject to be studied? How
representative is the sample? Is the context of the data appropriate for the
research question? Do the selected statistical tests appear appropriate?
4) Results, Discussions and Conclusion: Are results presented clearly and
analyzed appropriately? Are the tables, figures and graphs used in this
study relevant and clear? Is the explanation of the findings systematically
presented and well-organized? Are the data and findings of the study
compared sufficiently with other similar studies? Are the findings of the
article aligned with the objective of the study? Is the conclusion part of the
study clear, understandable, and sufficient? Does the conclusion
adequately tie together the other elements of the paper?
5) Implications for research, practice and/or society: Does the paper
identify clearly any implications for research, practice and/or society? Does
the paper bridge the gap between theory and practice? How can the
research be used in practice (economic and commercial impact), in
teaching, to influence public policy, in research (contributing to the body of
knowledge)? What is the impact upon society (influencing public attitudes,
affecting quality of life)? Are these implications consistent with the findings
and conclusions of the paper?
6) Quality of Communication: Does the paper clearly express its case and
measured against the technical language of the field? Has attention been
paid to the clarity of expression and readability, such as sentence structure,
jargon use, acronyms, etc.? Is the text both grammatically accurate and
clearly phrased?