Effects of Propellant Type On Low Power Arcjet Thruster Performance
Effects of Propellant Type On Low Power Arcjet Thruster Performance
Effects of Propellant Type On Low Power Arcjet Thruster Performance
1. Introduction of efficiency, argon was the best and nitrogen was the
Arcjet thrusters use electric arc to heat the gaseous worst. The efficiency of nitrogen was extremely low,
propellant instead of a combustion reaction. Due to its about 3-5 percent, compared with other two propellants.
high specific impulse and moderate thrust levels, the arc- This low efficiency was caused by the dissociation of the
jet thruster is playing an increasing role in satellite pro- gas molecules occurring in the thruster and the large radi-
pulsion. Low power hydrazine arcjets are now used for ation loss from the thruster wall. As a result, nitrogen was
north-south position-keeping of many satellites, while not appropriate for the propellant of the arcjet thruster.
higher power or lower power designs are in development Although a large amount of studies concerning low power
for spacecraft orbit transfer or mini/nano-satellite applica- arcjet operation on nitrogen, hydrogen, ammonia, argon
tions. For those applications, the arcjet thruster could pro- and hydrogen/nitrogen /ammonia mixtures have been
vide significant propellant savings in comparison with the reported as mentioned above, the effects of propellant
monopropellant hydrazine engine or the resistojet thruster type on the performance of arcjet have not been com-
due to its higher specific impulse. Although the arcjet pletely understood. Therefore, a systematic study has
thruster has been a relatively mutual technology in the been conducted by us to investigate the effects of different
United States, many other countries are also engaged in propellants on the arcjet operation.
developing their own arcjet technology in order to employ The 1 kW arcjet thruster used in this investigation was
the arcjet thruster in their own satellites. Work is also un- designed and developed by BUAA in the recent years.
derway to extend the mission applicability of the arcjet Different dimensions and structures of arcjet thruster were
thruster by expanding the power range and by investigat- designed and used in the experimental studies. Work was
ing the possibility of using other propellants. also performed on using various materials, such as ce-
Low power arcjet operation on hydrogen/nitrogen rium-tungsten or thoriated tungsten, as the arcjet cathodes
/ammonia mixtures was reported previously. The arcjet Anodes were also fabricated from four different materials,
had a typical performance of 450 s specific impulse at 1 i.e. cerium-tungsten, thoriated tungsten, pure tungsten or
kW with hydrogen/nitrogen mixtures[1,2] as the propel- molybdenum-tungsten, and were tested in a modular
lant. It was found that the amount of ammonia present in arcjet thruster at the 1 kW power level in different expe-
the gaseous propellant had significant effect on the arcjet riments. This paper describes some recent experimental
voltage-ampere characters. Also, hydrogen/nitrogen mix- results aimed at studying the effects of propellant type on
tures simulating ammonia gave approximately the same the low-power DC arcjet thruster performance. In the
arc characteristics as those of pure ammonia. The influ- present study, arc voltage, thrust and other important pa-
ence of propellant compositions on the performance cha- rameters of arcjet thruster are measured for various mass
racteristics of a low power arcjet thruster was experimen- flow rates of argon, nitrogen, nitrogen/ammonia mixtures
tally investigated by Tanaka et al [3]. Three kinds of gases, simulating hydrazine, while the arc current of the arcjet
i.e. argon, helium and nitrogen, were used as the propel- thruster is fixed constant (i.e. I=10 A), so that the effects
lant in their studies. It was found that the specific impulse of different propellants and mass flow rates can be re-
of helium was the highest among the three gases. In terms vealed.
2. Experimental apparatus and facilities Thrust Stand
Argon
80 achieved with the mass flow rate of 23.75 mg/s. The
arcjet thruster assumes high thrust level even at low mass
60
flow rates for the case using nitrogen/ammonia mixture as
the propellant. It means that using the nitrogen/ammonia
40
mixture can give appreciably higher specific impulse than
20 using nitrogen or argon.
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Current(A) 60
Nitrogen and Ammonia
Specific Power(MJ/kg)
50 Nitrogen
Fig. 6 Voltage-Ampere characteristics with different Argon
gases as propellants 40
30
200
Nitrogen and Ammonia
20
180 Nitrogen
Argon
10
Thrust(mN)
160
0
140 20 40 60 80 100
Mass Flow Rate(mg/s)
120
Fig. 9 Variation of the specific power with the mass flow
100 rates for different propellants (arc current I=10 A)
80
20 40 60 80 100 4. Conclusions
Mass Flow Rate(mg/s)
In this study, tests are conducted to reveal the effects
Fig. 7 Variation of the thrust with the mass flow rates for of propellant types on low power DC arcjet thruster per-
formance. Some important performance data, such as the
different propellant (arc current I=10 A) thrust, arc voltage, specific impulse and specific power of
arcjet thrust are measured in the tests with argon, nitrogen
500
Nitrogen and Ammonia and nitrogen/ammonia mixture simulating hydrazine as
Nitrogen
the propellants. Over the arc current range tested, arc vol-
Specific Impulse(s)
Argon
400 tage decreases with increasing arc current. For the range
of mass flow rates tested for different propellants, in-
300
crease in mass flow rate leads to the increase of the arc
voltage. The experimental results show that the arcjet
200
thruster operating with nitrogen/ammonia mixture can
give better performance than that with nitrogen or argon
100
as the propellant.
20 40 60 80 100
Mass Flow Rate(mg/s)
Acknowledgment
Fig. 8 Variation of the specific impulse with the mass This study was supported by the National Natural
flow rates for different propellants (arc current I=10 A) Science Foundation of China (No. 50836007)