Syllabus - Language Testing and Assessment
Syllabus - Language Testing and Assessment
Syllabus - Language Testing and Assessment
1
5. Indicative teaching schedule
Week Topic Required readings Lecture Presentation and/or Notes
Tutorial
1 Introductions and course overview Hughes 1 Yes No Sign up for
Social character of language test McNamara, Ch 6 Group
Measurement presentation
2 The relationship among tests, 1. Bachman, Ch. 2 Yes Yes
assessment, and evaluation 2. McNamara, Ch 7
Purposes of language assessments
3 Communication design of Language test 1. McNamara, Ch. 2 Yes Yes
Types of language assessment 2. Hughes Ch. 3
3. Bachman & Palmer, Ch.6
4 Conceptualization of validity 1. Bachman & Palmer, Ch. 2 & 7 Yes Yes
Validation process 2. Hughes, Chs. 4, 6
Washback effect
4 Stages of test construction 1. Bachman & Palmer, Chs. 5, 9 Yes Yes
Developing test specifications 2. Hughes, Ch 7
2
6. Assessment Items
6.1. Class attendance and participation: 10%
Students are expected to be present and on time. Students are required to have at least 80%
mandatory attendance as eligibility for further assessments. Each absence affects a student’s
class participation grade. For unavoidable absences, proper notification is expected.
Three absences will result in a Zero grade in total.
Students are expected to contribute actively to the course through discussion, comments,
and reports. Should students miss a class, it is their responsibility to find out what was covered
and to come prepared for the next session.
6.2. A mini-test (20%): One test is scheduled during the course. The test deals with concepts and
issues explored and discussed in the assigned readings and in class discussions. The test should
take around 1 hour.
6.3. Assessment battery (50%)
In groups of 2-3 students, students are required to construct a 60 to 90 minute
battery/instrument that focuses on assessing students’ second/foreign language ability or to
evaluate a test that they or their colleagues have used for students. The purpose of this
assignment (project) is to provide them with the opportunity to gain experience developing
sound assessment batteries that they can use in their current/future work setting. Students need to
consult with the unit instructor before they start their work.
3
Language Testing
The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
TESOL Quarterly
The Modern Language Journal
Whenever they use the work of another person, they must acknowledge that source using
the correct referencing system. Failure to acknowledge other people’s work appropriately may be
regarded as plagiarism or academic misconduct.
6.4. Oral Presentation (20%):
Students are required to give a 10-minute class presentation in group in which they review the
concepts and different theoretical issues of language testing and assessement presented in class
and in recommended documents and reflect on testing and assessment procedure at their teaching
institution. The presentation should be performed as in an international conference. Following
the presentation, class participants are given the opportunity to ask questions pertaining to the
talk. The purpose of this assignment is twofold. First, it is intended to give students opportunity
to review and share ideas with classmates on theoretical issues of the units. Second, it is their
time to relate the concepts to their teaching situations.
The presentation will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria:
• Presentation delivery skills
• Summary of the concepts presented in class and extended issues from recommended
readings ;
• organization of the presentation, including handouts and transparencies;
• response to discussion questions.
7. Reading materials
Required readings:
(1) Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and
developing useful language tests. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2) Hughes, A., (2003). Testing for Language Teachers, Cambridge, United Kingdom,
Cambridge University Press
(3) McNamara, T., (2000). Language Testing, Oxford New York, Oxford University Press.
4
(8) Gronlund, N.E. (1988). How to Construct Achievement Tests. 4th Edition. New Jerssy:
Prentice-Hall, INC.
(9) Heaton, J.B. (1988). Writing English Language Tests. Longman: London and New York.
(10) Fan, J and Jin, Y (2013). A Survey of English Language Testing Practice in China: the
Case of Six Examination Board. Language Testing in Asia, 3(7).
(11) Madsen, H.S. (1983).Techniques in Testing. OUP: New York.
(12) McMillan, J.H. (2001). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective
instruction. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
(13) Tomlison, B (2005). Testing to learn: a personal view of language testing. English
Language Testing Journal, 59(1), pp. 39-46
.
Further reading for assessing macros skills and linguistic components:
Listening:
Brindley & Saltyer (2002). Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment.
Language Testing, 19(4), pp. 369-394.
Buck (2001), Assessing Listening. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Chapter 4
Reading:
Alderson (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Chapter 7
Writing:
Weigle (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Chapter 7
Speaking:
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fulcher (2003). Testing Second Language Speaking. Pearson Longman: London. Chapter
7
Douglas (2000). Assessing Languages for Specific Purposes. Cambridge University
Press: New York. Chapter 6
Grammar:
Purpura, J. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vocabulary:
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
And the following testing journals:
Assessment in Education
International Journal of Testing
Language Assessment Quarterly
Language Testing