Marxist criticism views literary works as reflections of the social institutions and ideology of their time. It analyzes how works present society and the ideological functions they serve based on the writer's background. Marxist criticism, developed by Karl Marx, focuses on divisions of class, class struggle, oppression, and politics to understand a work's social and political elements rather than its aesthetic value.
Marxist criticism views literary works as reflections of the social institutions and ideology of their time. It analyzes how works present society and the ideological functions they serve based on the writer's background. Marxist criticism, developed by Karl Marx, focuses on divisions of class, class struggle, oppression, and politics to understand a work's social and political elements rather than its aesthetic value.
Marxist criticism views literary works as reflections of the social institutions and ideology of their time. It analyzes how works present society and the ideological functions they serve based on the writer's background. Marxist criticism, developed by Karl Marx, focuses on divisions of class, class struggle, oppression, and politics to understand a work's social and political elements rather than its aesthetic value.
Marxist criticism views literary works as reflections of the social institutions and ideology of their time. It analyzes how works present society and the ideological functions they serve based on the writer's background. Marxist criticism, developed by Karl Marx, focuses on divisions of class, class struggle, oppression, and politics to understand a work's social and political elements rather than its aesthetic value.
In this kind of literary criticism, works are viewed as a
reflection of the social institutions from which they
originate. It reviews the work of literature in terms of the society it presents. The work itself is considered as a social institution that has a specific ideological function based on the ideology and the background of the writer. An ideology is a belief system that underpins a political or economic theory. Ideologies form the operating principles for running a society. Examples: liberalism, conservatism, socialism, communism, theocracy, agrarianism, totalitarianism, democracy, colonialism, and globalism. WHO IS THE MAN BEHIND THE MARXIST CRITICISM? A German philosopher and economist who criticized the inherent injustice in the European class/capitalist system of economics operating in the 19th Century.
Since Karl Marx is a philosopher and also an economist, he tries
to apply political science and economics to the study of literature. That’s why on his book entitled The Communist Manifesto, Marx and co-author Friedrich Engels argue that all of history is about the struggle between the haves and the have - nots. Marx viewed history as a series of struggles between classes, in other words, the oppressed and the oppressors. • Class • Oppression • Power • Economy • Politics 3 CLASSES OF PEOPLE IN THE SOCIETY • Land owners- owns a huge part of the land (whose income is rent)
• Bourgeoisie- who owns the means of
production such as factories, machinery, and buildings ( whose source of income is profit)
• Proletariat- they are the working class
who works for the bourgeoisie (whose source of income comes from the salary) The basic goal of this literary criticism is to assess the political tendency of a literary work and determine whether its social content or literary forms are progressive. Marxist criticism pays special attention to the division of class, class struggle, oppression, and political background of the story. In other words, this criticism focuses more on the social and political elements of a work than its aesthetic (artistic and visual) value. HOW TO APPLY MARXIST THEORY TO LITERATURE As explained above, class, oppression, power, economy and politics are some of the main elements that should be considered in a Marxist literary criticism.
• What role does class play in the literary work?
• How does the author analyze class relations? • What does the author say about oppression? • Are class conflicts ignored or blamed? • How do characters overcome oppression? • Does the work support the economic and social status quo, or does it advocate change? • Does the work serve as propaganda for the status quo? If so, in what way does it attempt to serve as propaganda? • Does the work propose some form of utopian vision as a solution to the problems encountered in the work? • How has the author’s ideologies and background affect the way he views the economy, politics or society? • How do the time period, social background and culture in which the work was written affect the portrayal of the political, economic, and social forces?