RNW

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

A Call Out to the Phase out of a Cultural Icon

The Philippines roads and highways are always filled with colorful, open air vehicles are already
considered icons in the country: the jeepneys. These iconic vehicles has thousands of ordinary
commuters every day, and they are driven by “Manongs,” who are mostly ordinary individuals who work
all day with their steering wheels to feed the hungry stomachs of their families. However, their daily
livelihood, which is already a part of the country’s culture, is in danger. According to the report of Sarao
(2023), the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) announced that by the end of
the year, the traditional jeepneys would be phased out and replaced with modern jeepneys. According
to the LTFRB (as cited by Beltran, 2023), there are about 158,000 traditional jeepneys in the country,
while 5,300 modern jeepneys with air conditioning and security cameras are already on the road. Other
says that the phase out will be moved towards a more sustainable transportation system in the country.
The premise here is that the traditional jeepneys are powered by fossil fuels, which are not
environmentally sustainable since they contribute to the emission of greenhouse gases and air pollution.
However, this benefit can still be outweighed by the potential harm it poses to drivers, operators, and
commuters. Jeepneys are only 2% of the total registered vehicles in the Philippines, and the remaining
98% will still contribute much to the air pollution. The benefits will be minimal.

It will have an impact on small jeepney drivers and operators. A modern jeepney, which is like a minibus,
costs around PHP 2.6 million (Cruz, 2023). The number of modern jeepneys may not be commensurate
with the number of commuters who need the service of jeepneys, which are relatively cheaper
compared to riding a taxi or the railway transits (e.g., LRT and MRT). The said cost is much higher than
the proposed subsidy for jeepney operators, which is only pegged at PHP 260,000.00. This, in return,
would have a significant impact on the ability of the jeepney operator to continue with their business
after the traditional jeepneys are phased out. The ordinary jeepney drivers’ job will be put to a halt after
the discontinuation of the traditional jeepney operation. This would impact the daily living of their
family, as most jeepney drivers come from less privileged sectors and are typically seen as the
breadwinners of their families. This point may lead to the second impact, which is focused on daily
commuters. The lack of available jeepneys after the phase out and the limited number of modern
jeepneys as a result of their price, which is outside the financial capabilities of the operators, will burden
commuters. While it is understood that commuters deserve convenient and safer ride, especially in the
metro, the fare may become more costly as operators try to ensure a return on their investment in
buying modern jeepney units.

This government solution must be studied carefully so as not to become burden to those who will be
adversely affected by it. They must carefully weight the benefits and harms and ensure that the
vulnerable sectors will not be a more marginalized status. The traditional jeepneys may require
overhaul, but the phase out is very huge, anti-poor, and against our culture, especially in a developing
country like the Philippines.

You might also like