Histm 3
Histm 3
Histm 3
Sydnee Penrod
History 134
Professor McDonald
18 March 2023
1
The Assyrian Empire, Assyria, was a greatly strong empire, and would come to expand
very quickly to its surrounding land and concur cities all around. Assyria originates in Ashur,
which is located near the Tigris river in northern Iraq, and the people of it would soon grow tired
of the regional power they were under. The newly appointed king of Assyria, Tiglath-Pileser III,
declared war in 745 BCE, and those against him should not have taken it lightly. He made it his
mission bring back the once strong Assyria, and along with that came assembling a remarkable
army. The Assyrian Army was strong and brutal, and was given the best treatment by the king to
This all begins with the origin of Assyria, and how to got the be where it could supported
a well-trained army such as the Assyrian Army. In 1900 BCE, Ashur, which is the capital of
Assyria, is founded, and what leads them to the top is ultimately thanks to the Hittite’s empire
failing.1 The Hittites were an empire that lasted from 1600 BCE to 1180 BCE, and their
destroyed land was left there, waiting for a new power to overcome it. As we know, Assyria and
its army fight for this abandoned land and will find themselves victorious in the end. This is
because the Hatti was over Anatolia and Ashur, but was left in the shadows of these larger and
more powerful civilizations. The Hittites were the civilization who were known to acquired more
land and expand, as well as being advanced with using their resources and leaving behind
cultural achievements. These people were also called Amorities. Leading back to when the
Hattites had power over Ashur, The Assyrian King Shamashi Adad I had driven them out and
finally gained control over the city Ashur and secured the boarders of Assyria.
After the babylonian empire had fallen apart around 1750 BCE, Assyria panicked and
attempted to assert dominance and try to control multiple areas and cities surrounding Ashur, but
instead of being successful, a civil war had broken out instead. This had not been fixed until
2
Asyrian King Adasi had stepped in to secure the areas in the region back. His policies would be
followed after he was gone, but expansion soon became a problem that nobody necessarily
wanted to address. After this, the official end of Hittite power within the region of Ashur and
Assyrian territory would be thanks to Assyrian King Tukulti-Ninurta I, as his part in the Battle of
Nihriya in 1245 BCE would lead to this conclusion.2 Soon enough, he was killed and they
needed to quickly find another king who would help with expansion and growth within the
civilization. In 1200 BCE, this year is known as the year the bronze age collapsed, and left Ashur
and its empire almost unaffected. These tough times would follow with the rise of Tiglath Pileser
I, who ultimately saved the economy and military systems previously put in place. After his
death, his son followed his policies, along with the kings to follow. The only issue is that they
were pretty unsuccessful in expanding and protecting the boarders of the empire.
The most revolutionary Assyrian king had risen after this dull time of no expansion, and
he would come to be known as Tiglath Pileser III. He evolved the military to become a standing
army, the most significant an empire had ever seen, as well as caused rapid expansion outside of
the empire itself.3 We will focus more on the impact he left on the Assyrian military and how he
created them to be the most efficient and effective military in all of history at the time they
existed. Their weapons and fighting tactics were revolutionary for their time, and its all thanks
to the King putting in a lot of effort to try and make the best army known to man. He made
anything and everything his soldiers would need to become the best version of themselves, even
including an armory to look after all of the necessities, including the chariots, steeds, weapons,
etc. This army consisted of many different types of soldiers, including archers, swordsmans,
some who chose no weapon at all, but instead held shields to protect other soldiers out on the
battlefield. As mentioned earlier, the King took great care of his soldiers, as his pride stood with
3
them. He made sure they were well fed, clothed, trained, and ready for whatever comes at them,
including preparing them for actions such as raids into other regions to conquer more land.
More on why the Assyrian Army was so great, it was the first army to utilize chariots in
such a way that can have many different defense lines. They had three soldiers on one chariot,
usually an archer along with some sort of dagger, and one acting as a line of defense near the
back.4 Chariots were used to ram into enemies, creating an open gap for moving forward into the
enemy base/region. Iron weapons were also a staple piece of these soldiers training and
upbringing, as they found this metal to be hard enough the keep for longer periods of time
without having to sharpen or fix. The Assyrian army was known to be the most brutal and violent
army out of the three different civilizations, not the Hebrews had much of one to begin with.
They would often siege warfare, as well as kill whatever was in their way. They would try not to
shoot or injure horses though, as even the king saw them as important figures to not be brought
into war. Overall, the Assyrian Army conquered many regions outside the empire, and will
Works Cited
Mark, Joshua J. "Assyria." World History Encyclopedia. World History Encyclopedia, 10 Apr
The information in this source provides an overview of the history, culture, and
achievements of the ancient Assyrian civilization. The article begins by introducing the
geographical location of Assyria, which is in modern-day Iraq, and then explores the origins of
the Assyrian people and their early history. The article then delves into the most significant
achievements of the Assyrian civilization, including their impressive military campaigns, their
advanced administrative system, and their contributions to art, literature, and religion. The article
also discusses the decline of the Assyrian civilization, including the invasion of Assyria by the
Babylonians and the subsequent fall of the Assyrian Empire. Finally, the article highlights the
lasting legacy of the Assyrian civilization, including their influence on subsequent civilizations
Oppenheim, Leo. "The Organization of the Assyrian Army in the Neo-Assyrian Period." Journal
of the American Oriental Society, vol. 72, no. 2, 1952, pp. 59-66.
This source examines the structure and organization of the military forces of the Assyrian
Empire during the Neo-Assyrian period, which lasted from the ninth to the seventh centuries
BCE. Oppenheim analyzes various aspects of the Assyrian army, including its composition,
tactics, and command structure. The article draws upon a variety of sources, including Assyrian
texts and inscriptions, and provides insights into the military practices of one of the most
powerful empires of the ancient world. Overall, Oppenheim's article sheds light on the complex
and sophisticated organization of the Assyrian army during a crucial period of the empire's
history.
5
Parpola, Simo. "The Assyrian Army and Its Targets of Conquest." Iraq, vol. 55, 1993, pp. 147-
157.
In this article, Simo Parpola discusses the military campaigns of the Assyrian army
during the Neo-Assyrian period. The author explains that the Assyrian army was well-organized
and well-trained, with a hierarchy of officers and specialized units. Parpola also analyzes the
Assyrian army's strategies and tactics, as well as their targets of conquest, including the
Babylonians, Elamites, and other neighboring peoples. The author argues that the Assyrian
army's success was due to a combination of military prowess and a sophisticated system of
Radner, Karen. "The Military Campaigns of Tiglath-pileser III: A Reassessment." Iraq, vol. 67,
This specific source explores the military campaigns of Tiglath-pileser III, the king of
Assyria, during his reign between 745 and 727 BC. The article analyzes Tiglath-pileser III's
military strategies, targets of conquest, and the political and social contexts that led to these
campaigns. Radner also provides a detailed account of the Assyrian army's organization and
composition during this period. By reassessing the primary sources, Radner offers new insights
into the military campaigns of Tiglath-pileser III and challenges previous interpretations of his
reign.
6
Endnotes
1. Mark, 2018.
2. Oppenheim, pp 59.
3. Radner, pp 75.
4. Parpola, pp 150.