Flow in Closed Conduits IM
Flow in Closed Conduits IM
Flow in Closed Conduits IM
NRe = =
The Reynolds number is a ratio of the inertial momentum flux (rV2) in the flow direction
to the viscous shear stress or viscous momentum flux in the transverse (mV/D)
direction. Turbulent flow occurs when Reynolds number is greater than about 4000.
Viscous forces are a manifestation of intermolecular attractive forces that stabilize the
flow. Therefore stable laminar flow should occur at low Reynolds numbers where
viscous forces dominate.
6.2 Generalized Mechanical Energy Balance Equation
For laminar flow of a fluid in a cylindrical tube of radius R and length L, the Hagan-
Poiseuille equation provides a relationship between volumetric flow rate and pressure
drop across the tube as follows.
Q = tw = =
The friction factor for laminar flow (NRe = < 2000) is given by
f =
(6.2-3)
The friction factor for turbulent flow (Re > 4000) can be estimated by
Deq = 4rH = 4
where rH = hydraulic radius
Across = cross sectional area of the flow
Pwet = wetted perimeter of the duct
Solution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applying the mechanical energy balance between (1) and (2) we have
ef = 4 + Kfitting,j
4 = 2´ 10-3[4.06´ + 4.31´ + 6´ ]
= 5.77´ 103 m2/s2
Equation
where:
where Re is the Reynolds number, ρ is the fluid density, and v is the mean flow velocity,
which is half the maximal flow velocity in the case of laminar flow. It proves more useful
to define the Reynolds number in terms of the mean flow velocity because this quantity
remains well defined even in the case of turbulent flow, whereas the maximal flow
velocity may not be, or in any case, it may be difficult to infer. In this form the law
approximates the Darcy friction factor, the energy (head) loss factor, friction loss
factor or Darcy (friction) factor Λ in the laminar flow at very low velocities in cylindrical
tube. The theoretical derivation of a slightly different form of the law was made
independently by Wiedman in 1856 and Neumann and E. Hagenbach in 1858 (1859,
1860). Hagenbach was the first who called this law Poiseuille's law.
The law is also very important in hemorheology and hemodynamics, both fields
of physiology.[10]
Poiseuille's law was later in 1891 extended to turbulent flow by L. R. Wilberforce, based
on Hagenbach's work.
Derivation
The Hagen–Poiseuille equation can be derived from the Navier–Stokes equations.
The laminar flow through a pipe of uniform (circular) cross-section is known as Hagen–
Poiseuille flow. The equations governing the Hagen–Poiseuille flow can be derived
directly from the Navier–Stokes momentum equations in 3D cylindrical
coordinates (r,θ,x) by making the following set of assumptions:
Since u needs to be finite at r = 0, c1 = 0. The no slip boundary condition at the pipe wall
requires that u = 0 at r = R (radius of the pipe), which yields c2 = GR2/4μ. Thus we have
finally the following parabolic velocity profile:
The maximum velocity occurs at the pipe centerline (r = 0), umax = GR2/4μ. The average
velocity can be obtained by integrating over the pipe cross section,
The easily measurable quantity in experiments is the volumetric flow rate Q = πR2 uavg.
Rearrangement of this gives the Hagen–Poiseuille equation
where J0(λnr/R) is the Bessel function of the first kind of order zero and λn are the
positive roots of this function and J1(λn) is the Bessel function of the first kind of
order one. As t → ∞, Poiseuille solution is recovered.[11]
Poiseuille flow in an annular section[edit]
where
Therefore, the velocity distribution and the volume flow rate per unit length are
The velocity and the volume flow rate of tube with equilateral triangular cross-section of
side length 2h/√3 are
The velocity and the volume flow rate in the right-angled isosceles triangle y = π, y ± z =
0 are
Here, when a = b, Poiseuille flow for circular pipe is recovered and when a → ∞, plane
Poiseuille flow is recovered. More explicit solutions with cross-sections such as snail-
shaped sections, sections having the shape of a notch circle following a semicircle,
annular sections between homofocal ellipses, annular sections between non-concentric
circles are also available, as reviewed by Ratip Berker.
then it is easy to see that the problem reduces to that integrating a Laplace equation
on the wall.
Poiseuille's equation for an ideal isothermal gas
For a compressible fluid in a tube the volumetric flow rate Q(x) (but not the mass flow
rate) and the axial velocity are not constant along the tube. The flow is usually
expressed at outlet pressure. As fluid is compressed or expanded, work is done and the
fluid is heated or cooled. This means that the flow rate depends on the heat transfer to
and from the fluid. For an ideal gas in the isothermal case, where the temperature of the
fluid is permitted to equilibrate with its surroundings, an approximate relation for the
pressure drop can be derived. Using ideal gas equation of state for constant
temperature process, the relation Qp = Q1p1 = Q2p2 can be obtained. Over a short section
of the pipe, the gas flowing through the pipe can be assumed to be incompressible so
that Poiseuille law can be used locally,
Here we assumed the local pressure gradient is not too great to have any
compressibility effects. Though locally we ignored the effects of pressure variation due
to density variation, over long distances these effects are taken into account. Since μ is
independent of pressure, the above equation can be integrated over the length L to give
Darcy–Weisbach equation
where
μ is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid (Pa·s = N·s/m2 = kg/(m·s));
Q is the volumetric flow rate, used here to measure flow instead of mean velocity
according to Q = π/4Dc2<v> (m3/s).
Note that this laminar form of Darcy–Weisbach is equivalent to the Hagen–Poiseuille
equation, which is analytically derived from the Navier–Stokes equations.
Head-loss form
The head loss Δh (or hf) expresses the pressure loss due to friction in terms of the
equivalent height of a column of the working fluid, so the pressure drop is
where:
Δh = The head loss due to pipe friction over the given length of pipe (SI units: m);
[b]
Shear-stress form
The mean wall shear stress τ in a pipe or open channel is expressed in terms of the
Darcy–Weisbach friction factor as[7]
Colebrook-White Formula
Friction Losses[edit]
Before being able to use the minor head losses in an equation, the losses in the system
due to friction must also be calculated.
Equation for friction losses:
Friction may be observed as the resistance required for moving a body through the external surface.
But the friction loss is related to the flow of liquid through some pipe. Thus, it is a kind of energy
loss due to the friction inside the tube. It is therefore related to the velocity and viscosity of the fluid.
Friction loss can be computed as hl as friction loss is nothing but the energy loss. This resistance is
termed as pipe friction and is measured in meters head of the fluid. Many types of research have
been carried out to establish various formulae to calculate this loss.
The Darcy formula or the Darcy-Weisbach equation mainly tend to be referred for this computation.
And is now accepted as the most accurate pipe friction loss formula. Although it is more difficult to
calculate and use than other friction loss formulas, with the introduction of computers, it has
become the standard equation for hydraulic engineers.
Example: 1: Find out the friction loss, if the inner diameter and length of the pipe are 0.3 m and 30
m respectively. Also, the friction factor and velocity of the liquid are 0.4 and 25 m per sec?
g=9.8mpersqsec2
Now, friction loss formula is,
hl=f×L/D×v2/2g
=0.4×300.3×2522×9.8
=1275.51m.