Full Thesis PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 76

PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN NEPAL

A dissertation submitted to the office of the Dean, Faculty of Management in partial


fulfilment of the requirements for the of Master's Degree

By
MANOJ PRASAD BHATT
Roll. No: 11008/19
Registration No: 7- 2- 39- 374- 2014

Central Department of Management

Faculty of Management, Tribhuvan University

Kirtipur, Kathmandu

December, 2022
ii

CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORSHIP

I hereby corroborate that I have researched and submitted the final draft of
dissertation entitled "PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL
BANKS IN NEPAL". The work of this dissertation has not been submitted
previously for the purpose of conferral of any degrees nor it has been proposed and
presented as part of requirements for any other academic purposes.

The assistance and cooperation that I have received during this research work has
been acknowledged. In addition, I declare that all information sources and literature
used are cited in the reference section of the dissertation.

Manoj Prasad Bhatt

Signature: ………………

Date of submission: December, 2022


iii

Report of Research Committee

Mr Manoj Prasad Bhatt has defined research proposal entitled "PROFITABILITY


ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN NEPAL" successfully. The research
committee has registered the dissertation for further progress. It is recommended to
carry out the work as per suggestions and guidance of supervisor Lecturer Santosh
Kumar Ghimire and submit the thesis for evaluation and Viva voce examination.

……………………………
Dissertation Proposal Defended
Lecturer Santosh Kumar Ghimire
Date: March, 2022
Proposal Supervisor

……………………………. Dissertation Submitted

Lecturer Santosh Kumar Ghimire Date: December, 2022

Dissertation Supervisor

………………………………
Dissertation Viva voice
Prof. Dr. Mahananda Chalise
Date: December, 2022
Chairperson, Research Committee
iv

Approval Sheet

We have examined the dissertation entitled "PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF


COMMERCIAL BANKS IN NEPAL" Presented by Manoj Prasad Bhatt for the
degree of Master of Business Studies (MBS). We hereby certify that the dissertation
is acceptable for the award of degree.

................................
Lecturer, Santosh Kumar Ghimire
Dissertation Supervisor

…………………….
Dr. Sunita Bhandari
Internal Examiner

…………………..
Lecturer, Mr. Nirajan Basnet
External Examiner

……………………
Prof. Dr. Mahananda Chalise
Chairperson, Research Committee

………………………….
Prof. Dr. Bhawani Shanker Acharya
Head of Department,
Central Department of Management,
Date:
v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all, I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to the Central Department of
Management, Tribhuvan University for providing an opportunity carry out research
project. This project has been prepared for the partial fulfillment of the requirement
for the degree of Master of Business Studies (MBS). This research work is not
completed by only individual effort but several helpful hands have contributed in the
completion of the report. I express my deep appreciation to everyone who helped me
during this study.

A, special thanks goes to my eminent research guide Santosh Kumar Ghimire,


Lecturer of Central Department of Management Kirtipur, for his continuous guidance
and motivation undertaking and completing this research work, without his support
and advice this topic would have been completely overseen and may not have come to
be in time.

I would also like to deeply thanks, Faculty members Prof. Dr. Mahanand Chalise,
chairmen of research committee, Dr. Bal Ram Duwal and Dr. Bharat Singh Thapa,
Lecturer of Central Department of Management Kirtipur, for inspiring and providing
valuable guidance based on their academic knowledge and experience.

I would like to express my sincere and gratitude to all teaching and non teaching staff
members of Central Department of Management Kirtipur for their kind cooperation
during my research work.

Last but not least, I would like to thank my family members and friends for their
affection and emotional support that has encouraged me to achieve every success
including this research work.

Manoj Prasad Bhatt

December, 2022
vi

ABSTRACT

Profit maximization is one of most important objectives of commercial banks because


survive and face competition in competitive business environment at long term. This
study examines the profitability analysis of selected commercial banks in Nepal. In
order to investigate the profitability analysis, 5 commercial banks have been taken as
sample covering the period of time 2016/ 17 to 2020/ 2021. Data are collected from
annual report of the selected commercial banks.

In the study, the researcher used various types of tools for data analysis, trend
analysis, descriptive analysis, correlations and regression analysis. Profit is
dependent variable while, bank capital, deposit; lending, size and CAR are
independent variables. The research study show the positive relationship of return on
assets with BD and CAR where as negative with BC, BL and BS but. ROE have
negative relationship with BC, BL, BS and CAR but positive with BD. It is the evident
from the finding that profit of Nepalese commercial bank are strongly affected by the
bank capital, deposit, lending, size and capital adequacy ratio.

Keywords: ROA, ROE, CAR, Bank Capital, Deposit, Lending, Size.


vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENTS PAGE NO.

PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN NEPAL .................... i

CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORSHIP.................................................................... ii

REPORT OF RESEARCH COMMITTEE .............................................................. iii

APPROVAL SHEET.............................................................................................. iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................... v

TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................... vii

LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... viii

LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................ x

ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. xi

ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................... vi

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1-11

1.1 Background of the Study .................................................................................. 1

1.1.1 Profit and Profitability ............................................................................... 3

1.1.2 Introduction of Commercial ...................................................................... 4

1.2 Statement of the Problem ................................................................................. 7

1.2.1 Research Question ..................................................................................... 8

1.3 Objectives of the Study .................................................................................... 8

1.4 Rationale of the Study ...................................................................................... 8

1.5 Limitations of the Study ................................................................................... 9

1.6 Chapter Plan .................................................................................................. 10

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................... 12-24

2.1Introduction .................................................................................................... 11

2.2Theortical Review ........................................................................................... 11


viii

2.3 Conceptual Review ........................................................................................ 13

2.4 Empirical Review .......................................................................................... 15

2.4.1 Review of Journal Articles ...................................................................... 15

2.3.2 Review of Previous Thesis ...................................................................... 20

2.3.3 Literature Review Matrix ........................................................................ 21

2.5 Research Gap ................................................................................................. 23

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ............................................. 25-31

3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 25

3.2 Research Design ............................................................................................ 25

3.3 Population, Sample and Sample Size .............................................................. 25

3.4 Nature and Sources of Data ............................................................................ 26

3.5 Data Collection Procedures ............................................................................ 26

3.6 Data Processing Procedure and Data analysis Tools ....................................... 26

3.6.1 Statistical Tools ....................................................................................... 28

3.7 Research Framework and Definition of Variable ............................................ 28

CHAPTER 4: RESULT AND DISCUSION .................................................... 32-52

4.1 Results ........................................................................................................... 32

4.1.1 Data Presentation and Analysis ............................................................... 32

4.1.2 Findings .................................................................................................. 47

4.2 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 49

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION .......................................... 53-58

5.1 Summary ....................................................................................................... 52

5.2 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 54

5.3 Implications ................................................................................................... 55

REFERENCES

APPENDICES
ix

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO. Title PAGE NO.

4.1 Descriptive Statistics of Variable………………….. 38

4.2 Correlation Matrix between Variable……………… 40

4.3 ROE Model Summary…………………………….. 41

4.4 ANOVA with ROE………………………………. 42

4.5 ROE Coefficient Matrix………………………….. 43

4.6 ROA Model Summary……………………………. 44

4.7 ANOVA with ROA………………………………. 45

4.8 ROA Coefficient Matrix………………………….. 46


x

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NO. Title PAGE NO.

4.1 Trend Analysis of Bank capital……………………….. 32

4.2 Trend Analysis of Bank Deposit……………………… 33

4.3 Trend Analysis of Bank Lending……………………… 34

4.4 Trend Analysis of Bank Size………………………….. 35

4.5 Trend Analysis of CAR……………………………….. 35

4.6 Trend Analysis of ROE………………………………... 36

4.7 Trend Analysis of ROA……………………………….. 37


xi

ABBREVIATIONS

ATM Automated Teller Machine

BAFIA Bank and Financial Institutions Act

BC Bank Capital

BD Bank Deposit

BFIs Bank and Financial Institutions

BL Bank Lending

BS Bank Size

CAR Capital Adequacy Ratio

CDM Central Department of Management

FY Fiscal Year

LN Natural Log

Ltd. Limited

NRB Nepal Rastra Bank

Pvt. Private

ROA Return on Assets

ROE Return on Equity

S.D. Standard Deviation

T.U. Tribhuvan University


1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

The development of the national economy is regarded as being supported by the bank.
It is a financial organization that facilitates the exchange of funds by taking various
deposit types, disbursing loans, and providing other financial services. According to
bank history, an institutional banking system didn't exist in Nepal until the 19th
century, but before then, it's important to understand the definition of a financial
institution and how banks came to be. In general, the term "financial institution" refers
to a company that provides financing for trade, business, and industry. A financial
entity that deals with monetary transactions is a bank.
The word “bank” is derived from the Latin word “Bancus” or the French word
“Banque” and the Italian word “Bancus” which mean a “Bench”. During those days
the bankers used to do their banking business sitting on a bench in the market. The
bank's beginnings began in Italy. The banker makes money by accepting other
people's debts and offering them to him in exchange. The bank's standard banking
operations include charging cash for bank deposits and bank deposits for cash,
transferring bank deposits from one person or firm to another, exchanging bank
deposits for checks, government bonds, and secured or unsecured repayment
obligations from businesspeople.
A bank is a type of financial institution that has a big impact on how a nation
develops. It promotes the development of business, industry, and trade, all of which
can strengthen the country's economy. The collection of household savings from
various economic sectors is primarily the responsibility of the banking sector. Even
the most remote regions of the nation are now serviced by the banking industry,
which has significantly boosted the expansion of the national economy. The banks
have helped the economy flourish by investing their capital in small-scale businesses
through extensive financing programs (Van Horne, 2000).
In a broad sense, a bank is a significant financial institution that gathers and protects
the public's finances, distributes them for beneficial uses, transfers cash, and ensures
the exchange of currency. Given that banks offer a wide range of services to people
from all walks of life and have grown to be an integral element of contemporary
2

society. In fact, a modern bank performs so many different tasks that it is challenging
to provide a clear and comprehensive definition of it. This is the reason why many
economists have provided various definitions of it. A bank is a business that advances
money to people as needed while ensuring their safety, and to which people entrust
their money when it is not needed for immediate use.
A bank gathers funds from those with extra cash or who are saving it from their wages
and lends it to others in need. The banking sector has taken on a significant role in
attracting resources for financing and for the nation's socioeconomic growth.
Financing is the most crucial function to the economy and its component parts. Banks
support both the transfer of products and services from producers to consumers as
well as the government's financial operations.
An important component of the financial system that makes loans to sustain and boost
the level of consumption and production in the economy is banking, which gives a
nation's monetary system of payment. A strong banking system is essential for the
economy because of the fundamental roles it plays in intermediation, maturity
transformation, enabling payment flows, credit allocation, and upholding borrowers'
financial discipline. By allowing savings to be used outside of the sector from which
they came, banks can promote prudence and allocation of funds. Banks are the
principal providers of payment services, a hub for the execution of monetary policy,
and the center of economic and financial activity in any economy, regardless of how
well established or how underdeveloped its financial markets are.
It is believed that banks, which are a need and a major source of national wealth, must
be kept in constant fear, just as good banks are necessary for the nation's industry and
trade. As a result, the importance of banking as the driving force behind economic
development cannot be overstated. . Finance industry in Nepal basically consists of
two components, banking sector and non-banking sector. The banking sector includes
commercial banks while co-operatives, Grameen Banks, Development Banks,
Finance Companies and NGO’s make up non-banking sector. Commercial banks
make up the banking sector of the Nepalese financial system. Commercial banks play
a crucial role in economic development of every nation, and their significance and
role are well above average. They are viewed as the core of the financial system
because they hold deposits from numerous people, businesses, and government
agencies, and because they lend and invest money to borrowers who are individuals,
3

businesses, and government agencies. It keeps diverse economic sectors confident and
gives people credit (Argent,1968).

The amount of financial institutions has dramatically increased during the past 25
years. Following the implementation of economic emancipation policy, in particular
the liberalization of the financial sector, new banks and non-banking financial
institutions were encouraged to be established. The foundation for financial planning,
analysis, and decision-making is financial information. To forecast, contrast, and
analyze the firm's earning potential, financial data is required. It is essential for
supporting economic judgment. The financial statements or accounting reports of an
organization contain its financial information.

1.1.1 Profit and Profitability

Generally speaking, profit is the difference between revenue and expense. To put it
another way, profit is the remaining income, which is equal to the sales proceeds less
the cost. In other words, profit is what remains after costs are deducted from sale
revenues. Profit is the money left over for the company to use for future growth and
expansion or as a reward to be given to the entrepreneur in the form of dividends or
something similar. Profit, to put it simply, is the remaining earnings that are
anticipated to be accessible to the company after all expenses, fees, charges, and
provisions have been subtracted from the total revenue for a given period of time.
Every company organization needs to turn a profit in order to endure and develop
over time. The key indicator of a business's success is profit.
The ability of a business to use its resources to produce more money than it spends
defines profitability. In other words, this refers to a business's ability to make money
off of its operations. One of the four pillars for evaluating financial statements and
overall company success is profitability. The other three are market prospects,
solvency, and effectiveness. These fundamental ideas are used by creditors, managers,
and investors to assess a company's performance and potential for growth in the
future.
Revenues and expenses are the two main components of profitability. The income of a
business is its revenues. This is the revenue generated by selling goods or rendering
services to clients. But earning money doesn't come for free. In order to create these
goods and offer these services, businesses must employ their resources. Payroll for
4

employees, rent, utilities, and other production-related costs are covered by resources,
such as cash. In order to determine how well a firm is functioning and what potential
growth it may have in the future, profitability examines the relationship between
revenues and expenses.
Like all businesses, banks make money when their revenue exceeds their outgoing
costs. The fees a bank charges for its services and the interest it makes on its assets
account for the lion's share of its profits. Interest on its liabilities is its main outlay. A
bank's primary assets are its loans to people, companies, and other organizations, as
well as the securities it owns. In contrast, its primary liabilities are its deposits and the
money it borrows, either from other banks or by purchasing commercial paper in the
money market.
Profitability is significant in banks for the reasons listed below.
i. To keep the capital fund required as per Nepal Rastra Bank regulations.
ii. Banks need to be profitable in order to last and expand over the long term.
iii. Because shareholders spent their hard-earned money in the hope of a return,
profitability serves to please them.
iv. To pay the depositors interest.
v. To release the deposit and invest in various sectors.
vi. To know the situation of nonperforming assets and nonperforming loan.

vii. For dealing with transaction of foreign exchange.

1.1.2 Introduction of Commercial

Bank often refers to a commercial bank. A commercial bank is a bank that serves the
general public in the banking industry. Commercial banks are those financial
institutions that help a country's industry, commerce, and trade grow and operate. The
primary goal of commercial banks is to generate profits. In Nepal, Nepal Bank
Limited is the first commercial bank established in B.S 1994. In Nepal, commercial
banks kept in 'A' class categories. Nepal Rastra Bank regulated to commercial banks.

Commercial banks provide short term and mid term loan to public. In Nepal, there are
27 commercial banks operates financial transactions. Commercial banks play
significant role of economic develop of a nation. It works as a bridge between selling
and productions. It has different types of function i.e. accept deposit, loan provide,
foreign exchange, open L/C and agent function etc. Commercial banks invest public
5

deposit on productive sector whose give maximum return. Profit maximization is the
main goal of Nepalese commercial banks and it is the main financial indicator of
business entity (Wagle & Dahal, 2004). Brief introduction of sample commercial
banks are as follows.

Agriculture Development Bank Ltd (ADBL)

Agriculture Development Bank Limited (ADBL) is an autonomous organization


largely owned by government of Nepal. The bank established in 21 January 1968, has
completed glorious 54 year of its service. Thus ADBL operates as an ''A'' category
financial institution under the legal framework of BAFIA and the company act act.
The bank has a 51 percent share of the government of Nepal and 49 percent of the
general public. The slogan of bank is ''Sampurna Banking Suvidha Sahitko Tapai
Hamro Ghar Aanganko Bank '' The bank has been working as a premier rural credit
institution since the last three decades contributing a more than 67 percent of
institutional credit supply in the country. Hence, rural finance is the principal
operational area of ADBL. Besides it has also been executive Small Farmer
Development Program (SFDP). Bank has also been involved in commercial banking
operations since 1984. It provides deposit facility, various loan facility advance
ABBS service, Internet banking along with the ATM. Agriculture Development Bank
operates all over the 7 provinces and 77 district of the nation with its 278 offices and
73 ATM. ADBLNPKA is the swift code.

Global IME Bank Ltd (GIBL)

Global IME Bank Limited emerged after successful merger of Global Bank Ltd (an
“A” class commercial bank), IME Financial Institution (a “C” class finance company)
and Lord Buddha Finance Ltd (a “C” class finance company) in year 2012. Two more
development banks (Social

Development Bank and Gulmi Bikas Bank) merged with Global IME Bank Ltd in
year 2013. Later, in the year 2014, Global IME Bank Ltd made another merger with
Commerz and Trust Bank Nepal Ltd (an “A” class commercial bank). During 2015-
16, Global IME Bank Limited acquired Pacific Development Bank Limited (a “B”
class development bank) and Reliable Development Bank Limited (a “B” class
development bank).Janata Bank also merged with Global IME Bank in year 2019.
6

Global IME Bank Limited was established in 2007 as “A” class commercial bank in
Nepal which provided entire commercial banking services. It is in line with the aim of
the bank to be “The Bank for All” by giving necessary impetus to the economy
through world class banking services.

GIBL has been conferred with “The Bank of the Year Award 2014” for Nepal by the
Bankers Magazine (publication of the Financial Times UK) and “Best Internet Bank
2016-Nepal” by International Finance Magazine, London.

The bank has been maintaining harmonious correspondent relationships with above
60 different international banks from various countries to facilitate trade, remittance
and other cross border services. Through these correspondents the bank is able to
provide services in any major currencies in the world. The bank also maintains its
extension offices in India and Middle East to assist in the remittance of funds from
overseas Nepalese workers. The bank is now operating 287 branches, 48 extension
counters and revenue collection counters spread throughout Nepal. All of bank’s
branches have been established as full service outlets that offer a large range of
banking services to its customers. The bank also operates 237 ATMs throughout the
country strategically placed for the convenience of customers.

Nabil Bank Limited (NBL)

Nabil Bank Limited is an A class commercial bank in Nepal. It established in July 12


1984 with the name of Nepal Arab Bank Limited. It is the first joint venture bank in
Nepal. The bank mission is "To be the Bank of 1st choice of all our stockholders."
Nabil bank won Global SME finance awards in 2021. Its branch network is 135, 5
extension counters and 185 ATMS locations all over Nepal. It has broad international
relationship in banking. Nabil Invest Bank is the subsidiary company of Nabil bank
Ltd. NARBNPKA is the swift code Nabil bank.

Himalayan Bank Limited (HBL)

Himalayan bank limited is an A class commercial bank in Nepal. The bank was
established in 18 January 1993 with the partnership of Employment Provident Fund
and Habib Bank Limited of Pakistan. It provides banking services to its customer
through 73 branches, 5 extensions counter and 148 ATMS. "To become the Bank of
first choice is the main objective of Bank." It also involves various CSR activities like
7

as free health camp and financial support to patients. HIMANPKA is the swift code of
HBL

Siddhartha Bank Limited (SBL)

SBL is an A class commercial bank in Nepal was established in 24 December 2002. It


provides banking facilitates to its customers from 189 branches including extension
counters and 208 ATMS. It focuses on integrity, innovation and customer centricity.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

Profit is the essence of the commercial banking through the formulation and
implementation of lending strategies are most important responsibilities of top level
management and other staff. Liquidity management and non-performing loan and
asset policies also vital role play for earning profit in commercial banks.

Gautam (2018) founded that positive relation of return on asset with capital adequacy
ratio of Nepalese commercial banks. In the competitive business environment every
business organizations should be more concerned about factors affecting their
financial performance. Bhattrai (2017) concluded that bank size had positive
significant effect on commercial banks profitability in Nepal.

Financial sector, which has been correlated with trading and industry, has been
adversely affected. Investment in the productive sector has been adversely affected
and has been decreasing due to social security and labor problem. Profit is the most
for a bank to survive in the competitive market. And traditional profit is possible only
if the bank makes proper and safe investment. The increasing situation of non-
performing asset and loan also badly effect on commercial bank profit. Global
financial crisis of 2007-08 negatively impact of Nepalese commercial banks
profitability.

However, recent changes and trends happening in the Nepalese banking sectors,
especially the shortage of liquidity, merger& acquisition and decreasing foreign
exchange reserve also affect the commercial banks profitability in Nepal. Covid-19
pandemic also impact the business environment and Nepalese economy.
8

1.2.1 Research Questions

The research questions to be raised for covering the issues of this study are as follows:

i. What is the profitability position and it's determining factors (Bank Capital,
Bank Deposit, Bank Lending, Bank Size, CAR, ROA and ROE) of selected
commercial banks in Nepal?
ii. Is there any relationship between profitability and its determinants factors of
selected commercial banks in Nepal?
iii. Does determining factors impact on profitability of selected commercial banks
in Nepal?

1.3 Objectives of the Study

The general objective of this study is to examine the profitability position and its
determinants factors of selected commercial banks in Nepal. The specific Objectives
of the study are as follows:

i. To assess the profitability position and it's determining factors (Bank Capital,
Bank Deposit, Bank Lending, Bank Size, CAR, ROA and ROE) of selected
commercial bank in Nepal.
ii. To examine the relationship between profitability and its determinants factors
of selected commercial bank in Nepal.
iii. To analyze the determining factors impact on profitability of selected
commercial bank in Nepal.

1.4 Rationale of the Study

From the perspective of investors, this study is crucial since they will base their
investment decisions in the future on the profitability of the investing banks. I learned
through reading a study of the literature in the form of research articles and theses that
practically all of them only discuss the profitability analysis of various types of sector
banks, including private, public, foreign, cooperative, and combinations of these. I
haven't come across any research that goes beyond analyzing profitability to
pinpointing the profitability position and its influencing elements of particular
Nepalese commercial banks.

One of the important elements in a nation's economic and social development is the
mobilization of its own resources. The main players in this industry are financial
9

institutions. The stronger an economy's ability to thrive economically is, the more
wholesome its banking practices are. Since profitability determines how successful a
bank is, profit is the primary metric. The rate of interest on deposits has significantly
increased lately, which has decreased the bank's profit. In this situation, the banks
must also manage their operating costs and fund costs.

Numerous studies on the financial performance of Nepalese commercial banks have


been conducted, although the most of them have focused on the investment function
and financial analysis. The improved application of management techniques and
strategies for creating the best course of action to produce remarkable performance in
the banking industry is the main emphasis of this study.

i. This study support to examine the profitability position and determining


factors of selected commercial banks in Nepal,
ii. This study supports in predicting, comparing and evaluating the earning ability
of Nepalese commercial banks,
iii. The profitability analysis of banks is useful to the policy maker to identify the
success or failure of banks and to adopt good strategy for success of bank,
iv. This study will be useful for researcher, students and other, who wants to
further research in details,

1.5 Limitations of the Study

Following are the some of the limitations of this study:

i. Research is based on secondary data from 2073/74 to 2077/78 collected


from respective annual reports of banks. As such, reliability of the data is
limited to the fair disclosure of data by the banks in their annual reports.
ii. Statistical tools used in the data analysis to draw inferences are prone to
their inherent limitations considering sample size of the study.
iii. The study includes samples drawn from the five commercial banks out of
the 27 which may not be sufficient to draw inferences about the whole
population sample.
iv. Other determinants of bank's profitability mainly macroeconomic factors
have not been incorporated in the study.
v. Only profitability aspect of banks is carried under this research. Liquidity
aspect of the bank and its impact on profitability has not been pursued.
10

1.6 Chapter Plan

An outline known as a chapter plan aids in the clear organization of the material. It
can be a very helpful tool for aiding in the identification of the chapter's important
ideas. Except for the introduction, references, and appendix, the report will be
organized into five chapters. The title page, approval page, acknowledgement, table
of contents, list of tables and list of figures, acronyms, and abstract are all included
in the preliminary section.

Chapter 1: Introduction

The study area and a concept remark regarding the research challenge are included in
the first chapter. It covers the background of the study, a problem statement, the
study's purpose, its justification, its limitations, and its chapter plan.

Chapter 2: Literature Review

The second chapter deals with the review of literature. Review of literature includes
review of related books, journals, articles, and previous thesis etc.

Chapter 3: Research Methodology

This chapter presented about research methodology, which is used in research study.
It includes the introduction, research design, study of population and sampling, nature
and sources of data, data collection method and method of data analysis.

Chapter 4: Results and Discussion

This chapter discusses the analysis of pertinent data that has been gathered from a
variety of sources. Additionally, it analyzes the data and provides an explanation in
line with the study's goals.

Chapter 5: Summary and Conclusion

This final chapter gives a succinct overview of the study's history, research purpose,
literature review, methodology, findings, conclusion, and implementation.
11

CHAPTER II

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Introduction

Reviewing the literature entails analyzing research papers or other pertinent


arguments in the study's linked field in order to identify all previous studies'
limitations and conclusions and perform new research. It is a necessary and essential
step in the study process. . A dissertation for an undergraduate or graduate program
must include a thorough literature review, which frequently takes up a distinct chapter
or a sizable chunk and is typically placed near the start of the final product. It offers
the fundamental data needed to support the research topic and develop the study
design.

The major goal of reviewing prior research is to learn the findings of studies
conducted in fields where similar ideas and techniques have been applied successfully
in the past. Additionally, a thorough or exhaustive review process may provide
important connections with the various trends and phases in the research in one's field
of expertise, familiarizing one with the distinctive perceptions, concepts, and
interpretation with the specialized terminology, and providing the justification for
understanding one's proposed investigation. In this connection, a review of previous
related research projects will help the researcher to formulate a satisfactory structure
for the project (Wolf & Pant, 2002).

A review of the literature is an inventory of the sources that are accessible for a
particular area of study. The idea of financial analysis, conceptual review, reviews of
related studies, empirical review, and research gaps are all included.

2.2 Theortical Review

To explain the profits made by business owners, economists have proposed a number
of profit theories. The debate regarding the entrepreneur's function is at the center of
the majority of hypotheses. Some of the fundamental ideas of profit are briefly
explored in the section that follows.
12

Frictional Theory of Profit

This theory was developed by prof.G.J. Stigler. This idea holds that there is a normal
rate of profit, or return on capital, that must be paid to capital owners as compensation
for saving and investing their money rather than using up all of their income or
hoarding it. According to this hypothesis, economic profit is temporarily lost as a
result of frictional components adjusting to the new situation. For instance, during the
1990s spike in oil prices brought on by the US-Iraq conflict, numerous oil refining
companies made substantial financial gains.

Monopoly Theory of Profit

Monopoly theory of profit was created by John Robbinson, E.H. Chamberlin, and M.
Kalecki. Due to the significant barriers to entry for new businesses, monopoly
enterprises can continue to make money even over the long term. Monopoly
corporations have complete control over the resources needed to provide a good or
service, whether through economies of scale, legal sanction, ownership patents, or
government import restrictions.

Innovation theory of Profit

Joseph A. Schumpeter created the innovation hypothesis of profit. According to the


innovation theory of profit, entrepreneurs' successful innovations lead to economic
profit. Innovation can be split into two categories. The first kinds of innovation are
those that lower production costs. The introduction of new and less expensive
technology and machines are among the first sorts of innovation. The second category
of innovation is one that raises consumer demand for the good. The launch of a new
product and a new variety or design of the products is examples of second forms of
innovation.

Surplus Theory of Profit

The surplus value, according to Karl Marx's surplus theory of profit, is the difference
between the price and the wages (or labor value). It asserts that all productive values,
and as a result, the sales value of any good, derive only from the quantity of effort put
into its production. It follows that capital and enterprise are not products, only labor
is. A residual theory of profits is surplus theory. Marx's theory states that surplus
13

value is the extra value produced by workers over and above the cost of their own
labor, which is then seized by the capitalist as profit when goods are sold.

Theory of Risk and Uncertainty Bearing

The theory of taking chances was first created by F.B. Hawley, who came to the
conclusion that profit is an entrepreneur's reward for taking risks. Professor F.H.
Knight adopted the theory, however, and split risk into insurable and uncertain
components. Knight therefore claims that the payoff for an entrepreneur's non-
transferable role in assuming non-insurable risk and uncertainties is profit.

2.3 Conceptual Review

Profit and ability are the two words that make up the word "profitability." It speaks to
an organization's ability to turn a profit. It is also known as the investment's earning
power or earning capacity. Commercial bank profitability analysis has made for
excellent academic study courses. A commercial bank is a bank that provides banking
services to both businesses and the general public. Maximizing profits is the
commercial bank's primary goal. A bank is a business that accepts deposits from
various accounts or other forms and gives customers the option to withdraw funds
using checks or promissory notes.

Profit is the main indicators of every business organization. The profitability of bank
is a course of great interest in bank management, financial market, bank supervision
and academics (Pawlowska, 2016).

Bank is an organized institution, which established for doing financial transactions.


The goal of the conceptual literature review is to categorize and describe the concepts
relevant to the study or topic and outline a relationship between them, including
relevant theory and empirical research. Review of conceptual studies on the major
concepts and issues relating to banks profitability are as follows.

Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) Hypothesis

According to structure conduct performance (SCP) paradigm, market structure


influence firm behavior, which influences performance. It is derived from the neo-
classical analysis of market. The SCP model was developed by Bain in 1951 but
formalized by Mason in 1939 as the method of identifying markets and firms.
14

Most early research interpretation for the relationship between the concentration and
profitability based on structure- conduct- performance (SCP) hypothesis and focused
on the explanation of a positive empirical relationship between concentration and
profitability.(Goddard et.al 2004). The, SCP paradigm contend that there is a
relationship between degree of market concentration and the degree of competition
among firm.

Pawlowska(2016) analyzed the effect of market structure as it relates to profitability,


with particular focus on whether banks that are operating in concentrated market
create more profit or not.

The Efficient Structure Hypothesis (ESH)

Efficient structure hypothesis was developed by Demsetz in 1973. Efficient structure


of hypothesis is a theoretical framework for studying determinants of commercial
banks profitability. It implies that increasing concentration that leads to increase
profitability. A good concentration – profitability association may imply a positive
link between the size and efficiency, according to efficient hypothesis.

Berger& Hannan(1989) observed that banks in more concentrated markets pay lower
deposit rates is consistent with the structure conduct performance hypothesis
implication although it is not a prediction of the efficient structure hypothesis
common form.

Market Structure Theories and Bank Profitability

Market structure theory explains that how different industries are classified and
differentiated based on their degree and nature of competition for goods and services.
The classical firm theory claimed that a company goal is to maximize profit. In
practice this theory is not applicable because different organization has different goal.
In the previous research market structure can be divided into two types, they are
structure- conduct- performance (SCP) paradigm and the efficient structure
hypothesis(ESH).

Market structure theory based on two alternative policy drives in order to increase
profit of the banks industry and for rationalizing market structure in banking industry.
15

2.4 Empirical Review

An empirical review analyzes earlier research works and provides research questions
with answers. It is founded on research or observations. It provides a thorough report
of a different study project.

2.4.1 Review of Journal Articles

Berger and Hannan (1989) investigated non-competitive pricing practices may


account for the positive association between market concentration and banks'
profitability. The empirical findings are strongly in line with the structure
performance hypothesis' implications. The apparent influence of concentration on
deposit rates was examined to determine why there are such large variations over the
sample period.

Neceur (2003) used ten sample Tunisian banks from 1980 to 2000 and a panel linear
regression model, reported a strong positive effect of capitalization to ROA. Use
CAMEL framework to examine the banks performance.

Alexio and Voyazas (2009) examined the conventional Structure- Conduct-


Performance (SCP) hypothesis was included into an empirical framework to explore
the influence of bank-specific and macroeconomic factors of banks profitability. On
six Greek banks, a panel data technique has been successfully deployed. The study
contends that the profitability association is only somewhat strong for any regular or
systematic size. Most bank-specific factors have a big impact on bank profitability.

Jha and Hui (2012) used a sample of eighteen Nepalese commercial banks from the
period 2005 to 2010 and based on CAMEL model. . This research report compares the
financial performance of Nepal's commercial banks with various ownership
structures. While capital adequacy ratio affects return on equity, return on assets was
impacted by capital adequacy ratio, interest expenditures to total loan, and net interest
margin. ROA and ROE have been used to gauge profitability. According to the study,
CAR, interest payments on loans, and NIM all significantly impacted ROA, with
CAR's impact on ROE also being taken into account.

Al-Jafari and Alchami (2014) investigated the determinants of bank profitability in


Syria. The hypothesis was tested using a sample of 17 banks from the years 2004 to
2011 and the GMM approach. Inflation rate and bank profitability as defined by ROA
16

were shown to have a positive and significant link by the study, however real gross
domestic product growth rate and bank profitability had a negative and significant
relationship.

Aldwan (2015) in their study about the effect of bank size on profitability categorized
banks into three categories according to their asset size, in the respect to their Total
assets, the (ROE) ratio measure the bank profitability, which is dependent variable.

Fissena (2015) suggested the comprehensive model, which incorporates macro-


economic, industry specific and bank specific determinants of commercial bank
profitability. It is recommended to acquire pertinent data for decision-making via
meta analysis. Bank profitability is not greatly influenced by capital adequacy

Hooshyari and Moghanloo (2015) examined the impact of inflation on profitability of


banks. Sample populations are state and private banks in Iran. The study period is
between fiscal year 2010 till 2013. Deductive and descriptive statistical method are
used to analyze the data resulted from collected questionnaire. Inflation, NIM, bank
size, liquidity, taxation, capitalization, cost efficiency, non- transaction and BDS are
the variables which impact the profitability of banks.

Ishfaq (2015) had used annual report from the period 2008-2012 from 26 commercial
banks in Pakistan. With 130 observations, the researcher had utilized a panel data
model. Two different metrics that assess bank profitability are ROA and NIM. The
researcher employs arithmetic mean, coefficient of variation, correlation, and trend
analysis to analyze the data and determine the outcome.

Pawlowska (2016) analyzed the impact of banking sector structure and


microeconomic changes on bank profitability in the Polish banking sector over the
past fifteen years. Researcher tests the impact of foreign capital on the profitability of
Polish banks. Researcher find out foreign ownership and disintermediation have a
positive effect on bank profitability in the period 1997to 2012.This study find out no
evidence support the SCP by hypothesis. The study concluded that insignificant
correlation between profitability and concentration for all estimations but positive
correlation between profitability, relative market power and size.

Bhattarai (2017) have examined the effect of non- performing loan on the profitability
of commercial banks in Nepal, using poled data of fourteen commercial banks with
17

77obsevations during the period of 2010 to 2015. The result found that non-
performing loan ratio has negative effect on overall banks profitability and positive
effect on shareholders return.

Islam and Rana (2017) investigated the determinants of profitability of fifteen


selected private commercial banks in Bangladesh over the period 2005- 2015. The
impact of non-performing loan cost to income ratio, loan to deposit ratio, commission
fees, cost of funds, and operating expenses on bank profitability metrics like return on
asset and return on equity was investigated by the researcher using a panel data
model. According to the empirical findings, it is clear that operational costs and non-
performing loans are crucial factors in determining the profitability of private
commercial banks in Bangladesh.

Nuhiu, Hoti and Bektashi (2017) adopted an explanatory approach by using balanced
panel data research design to achieve the stated objectives. 10 commercial banks are
taken as sample from the period 2010- 2015. The model based on regression analysis.
Study concluded that commercial banks profitability in Kosovo is driven mainly by
internal determinants factor such as capital adequacy, asset quality and management
efficiency, while macroeconomic factors have insignificant impact effect on financial
performance of commercial banks. Capital adequacy and liquidity presented negative
impact on financial performance of commercial banks.

Shrestha (2017) examined the relationship between liquidity management and


profitability and its impact on profitability of commercial banks in Nepal. The relation
between the liquidity management and profitability is investigates using Pearson
correlation analysis. Using regression to analyzed the effect of liquidity on
profitability. Using four year sample data taken from commercial banks. Researcher
found that liquidity does not have its significant impact on profitability in Nepalese
commercial banks.

Gautam (2018) analyzed the determinants of financial performance of commercial


banks in Nepal. Ten commercial banks were chosen as a sample for the study, which
looked at the factors influencing financial performance from 2006–2007 to 2016–17.
Data gathered from annual reports of banks. The gathered data is examined using
multiple regression models. The gross domestic product, asset quality, managerial
effectiveness, liquidity management, and capital adequacy ratio all affect the financial
18

success of Nepal's commercial banks. The capital adequacy ratio, management


effectiveness, and gross domestic product are all positively correlated with return on
assets, but asset quality, liquidity and management efficiency are negatively
correlated

Abbas, Iqbal and Aziz (2019) analyzed the impact of bank capital, bank liquidity and
credit on the profitability of commercial banks in the past crisis period between 2011
to 2017 in 481 on development economies comparison to USA banking industry.
Researcher used two- step GMM method to analyze the data. Study find out 6%
increase in capital leads to 1% increase profit a, 3.5% increase in liquidity leads to a
1% increase in profit.

Bapu (2019) evaluated the profitability and liquidity position of banks with reference
to pre and post merger in India. CAMEL approach used for data analysis. 17 banks
taken are as sample size from the period 1998- 2016. Researcher finding that better
financial performance for ICICI bank after the merger.

Dao and Nguyen (2020) aims to explored the relationship between profitability and its
determinants in commercial banks of Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia from 2012 to
2016. Researcher use panel data regression. Data collection from 135 observations of
27 domestically- incorporated commercial banks consisting of ten, nine and eight
banks in Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia. ROA, ROE and TOBINQ are defined as
profitability indicators, which are impacted by three main types of independent
variables namely bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic-specific.
Researcher found the significantly negative relationship between operational risk and
banking profitability.

Mishra, kandel and Aithal (2020) conducted a research work to insect the profitability
of commercial banks in Nepal. Seven commercial banks that were not registered with
Nepal Rastra Bank were the subject of the study. The purpose of the study is to
evaluate the influence, contribution, and relationship of size, loan and deposit,
inflation, and capital on the profitability of the banks using secondary data from 2013
to 2019. Tools for correlation, regression, and ratio analysis were utilized to ensure
that return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin all
contributed to each other (NIM). While there is a positive correlation between ROA
19

and ROE and bank size and inflation, there is a negative correlation with loan ratios,
deposit ratios, and capital ratios.

Neupane (2020) showed that banks profitability measured by return on assets of


Nepalese commercial banks is significantly affected by concentration ration, banking
sector development, gross domestic product, growth, inflation and exchange rate
where significantly not effected by internal factor like bank size, capital and deposit.

Pandey and Budhathoki (2020) attempted to investigate the impact of liquidity and
profitability of the private banks in Nepal by focusing on certain ratios over a period
of nine years. For the sample, four commercial banks have been chosen. Measures of
bank profitability Investment ratio, capital ratio, and liquidity ratio are chosen as the
independent factors, and ROA and ROE are the dependent variables. To test the
hypothesis, a linear regression model was used in the study. According to the study, a
high capital ratio indicates a high return.

Shrestha (2020) used panel data of 17 commercial banks for the period of 2010/11-
2017/18. According to research, managerial effectiveness, asset quality, and
operational effectiveness significantly improve the financial performance of Nepalese
commercial banks, whereas credit risk has the opposite effect. The study found that
the financial performance of Nepalese commercial banks is significantly impacted by
bank-specific characteristics.

Adhikari (2021) investigated the efficiency, profitability and stability of the Nepalese
commercial banks. In their study, the researchers utilized a descriptive and casual
comparative research approach. Data collected from 2011/12 to 2019/20, based on
243 observations from 27 commercial banks. The relationship between dependent and
independent variables was explored using correlation, simple, and multiple regression
analysis. The study found a strong and negative correlation between bank profitability
and stability, but a significant and positive correlation between bank efficiency and
profitability.

Buchory (2021) analyzed funding strategy and credit performance and its effect on
banking profitability. The descriptive and verification method with the quantitative
approach used in this research. Secondary data used from the quarterly published
financial statements of the CIMB Niaga bank in Indonesia from 2012- 2020 and
20

multiple regression used for data analysis. Study concludes that particularly TPFS has
a negative but not significant effect on ROA.

Hakuduwal (2021) examined the impact of bank specific factor on profitability of


Nepalese commercial banks. The study applied pooled least square method. Taking
112 observations from sixteen commercial banks, the period is 2012 to 2019.
Researcher find out total assets and total loan and advance have significant effect on
profitability of Nepalese commercial banks.

Infpnta and Ashwin (2021) examined the profitability analysis of the selected private
banks in Indi. Three private banks are taken as sample from the period of 2015/16-
2019/20. Research used profitability ratio for analyze collective data. Study concludes
that Axis bank and ICICI banks performance is strong during the study period.

Kryeziu and Hoxha (2021) included 19 euro area countries with 323 observations
from the period 2003 to 2019. Secondary data collected from World Bank data base.
Researcher used fixed- effect regression and Arellan- bond GMM estimator for
analyze the data. Study concluded that CAR, liquidity funds of source, asset quality,
non- performing loans and economic growth affect the bank profitability.

2.3.2 Review of Previous Thesis

Pokharel (2011) examined the comparison on the profitability of the profitability of


Nepal SBI and Nepal Bangladesh bank. . The goal of the study is to assess the banks'
deposit and lending trends. Study essentially follows secondary data throughout the
course of five years. To examine the data gathered, the researcher employed statistical
tools including the standard deviation and coefficient of variation as well as financial
instruments. The study came to the conclusion that Nepal SBI is superior to Nepal
Bangladesh bank based on trend analysis of the deposit collecting position, lending
position, invest position, and net profit position trends over the time.

Chandulal (2016) investigated the evaluation of financial performance of private and


public bank and also analyze the factors which determine the strong / week financial
performance of private and public sector banks in India. 12 years of secondary data
were used in the study. To assess the data gathered, the researcher used statistical
methods and financial ratios. According to the study, the financial performance of
private sector banks is superior to public sector banks on the basis of CAN.
21

Adhikari (2018) had used annual general report of NABIL and SBI from 2012/13 to
2016/17. In order to examine the gathered data, the researcher employed the least
squares approach, regression, the Karl Pearson coefficient of correlation, and financial
instruments. The goal is to determine the liquidity situation of particular commercial
banks. NABIL has a worse relative liquidity position than SBI bank, although it has
the biggest investment in government securities relative to current assets.

Baral (2018) studied the profitability analysis of commercial bank in Nepal. The
objective of the study is comparison of profitability between RBB and GBIME during
the period. The researcher used least square method and ratio analysis. The researcher
used five years secondary data, which is collection from annual report. The study
found profitability position of GBIME is better than RBB in the study period.

2.3.3 Literature Review Matrix

The whole review of literature with writers, objectives, methodology and findings are
as follows.

Authors(year) Objective of research Research Findings


Methodology

Jha and Hui The study compared the .Multivariate The study concluded
(2012) financial performance of regression that ROA has
different commercial banks analysis affected by CAR,
in Nepal. interest expenses to
loan ratio and NIM
where as CAR had
considerable impact
on ROE.

Baral (2018) The study compared Least square The result revealed
profitability of RBB and method and that profitability
position of GBIME is
GBIME in the selected ratio analysis better than RBB in
period. the study period.

Gautam (2018) This study analyzed the Multiple The positive relation
financial performance of regression of ROA with CAR,
Management
22

efficiency and GDP


commercial banks in Nepal. model
where as negative
with assets quality
and liquidity.
Mishra, Kandel This study assed the impact, Correlation, There is negative
and Aithal contribution and regression relation of ROA and
relationship of bank size, and ratio ROE with loan ratio,
(2020)
loan, deposit, Inflation and analysis deposit ratio, where
capital on the profitability positive with bank
of the banks. size and inflation.
Neupane (2020) The study analyzed the key Panel data The study founded
determinants of profitability regression that external factors
in Nepalese commercial model affect the bank's
banks. profitability in Nepal,
measured by ROA.
Pandey and The study attempted to Liner The study concluded
Budhathoki(202 investigate impact of regression that higher capital
0) liquidity and profitability of model ratio indicates higher
commercial banks in Nepal. return and vice versa.

Adhikari (2021) To investigated efficiency, Correlation The study concluded


profitability and stability of and multiple negative relation
Nepalese commercial banks. regression between bank
efficiency and
profitability and
positive with
stability.
The study examined the Pooled least The researcher found
Hakuduwal
(2021) impact of bank specific square total assets; loan and
factors on profitability of method advance have
Nepalese commercial banks. significant effect on
profitability of
Nepalese commercial
banks.

Source: Review of literature


23

2.5 Research Gap

Pokharel (2011) examined the comparison on the profitability of the profitability of


Nepal SBI and Nepal Bangladesh bank. . The goal of the study is to assess the banks'
deposit and lending trends. Study essentially follows secondary data throughout the
course of five years. To examine the data gathered, the researcher employed statistical
tools including the standard deviation and coefficient of variation as well as financial
instruments. The study came to the conclusion that Nepal SBI is superior to Nepal
Bangladesh bank based on trend analysis of the deposit collecting position, lending
position, invest position, and net profit position trends over the time.

Chandulal (2016) investigated the evaluation of financial performance of private and


public bank and also analyze the factors which determine the strong / week financial
performance of private and public sector banks in India. 12 years of secondary data
were used in the study. To assess the data gathered, the researcher used statistical
methods and financial ratios. According to the study, the financial performance of
private sector banks is superior to public sector banks on the basis of CAN.

Adhikari (2018) had used annual general report of NABIL and SBI from 2012/13 to
2016/17. In order to examine the gathered data, the researcher employed the least
squares approach, regression, the Karl Pearson coefficient of correlation, and financial
instruments. The goal is to determine the liquidity situation of particular commercial
banks. NABIL has a worse relative liquidity position than SBI bank, although it has
the biggest investment in government securities relative to current assets.

Baral (2018) studied the profitability analysis of commercial bank in Nepal. The
objective of the study is comparison of profitability between RBB and GBIME during
the period. The researcher used least square method and ratio analysis. The researcher
used five years secondary data, which is collection from annual report. The study
found profitability position of GBIME is better than RBB in the study period.

Second the previous research work has not been conducted profitability analysis
between ADBL, GBIME, NABIL, HBL and SBL. Now a day business environment is
more competitive. So that Nepalese banking sector also more competitive on the basis
of profit earning. Profit earning is main goal of every banking sector. Every year
24

change the financial performance of banking sector according to the business


environment of country.

This research therefore will facilitate readers to identify the profitability position and
operating financial efficiency of ADBL, GBIME, NABIL, HBL and SBL, which will
help to evaluate past and present performance of both the banks as well as it will help
to project their future prospect also. Therefore, this study fulfills the confusion and
uncertainty about profitability analysis by using various financial ratios of sample
commercial banks in Nepal. . This study is beneficial from an academic and policy
standpoint to interested individuals, parties, academics, students, businesspeople, and
the government.
25

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

The term "research methodology" refers to a strategy or approach for gathering,


sorting, processing, and analyzing data on a particular subject.

Research methodology describes the methods and process applied in entire study. It
sequentially refers to the various steps to be followed by a researcher .This study
basically helps to conclude the real profitability position and its determining factors
of Agriculture Development Bank, Global IME Bank Ltd NABIL Bank Ltd,
Himalayan Bank Ltd and Siddhartha Bank ltd. To accomplish the goal, the study
follows the research methodology describe in this chapter.

3.2 Research Design

The research design acts as a framework for the study, directing the use of the
research instrument and the sampling strategy as well as the data collecting and
analysis. The study largely adhered to both a descriptive and analytic research design.
Descriptive research designs collect and display data in a methodical way to paint a
clear picture of the research problem. The study's primary goal was to evaluate the
profitability of a few particular banks. To examine facts, some financial tools,
statistical tools, graphs, and many lines have been used.

3.3 Population, Sample and Sample Size

The population of this study comprised all the 27 commercial banks in Nepal. Out of
27 commercial banks in Nepal there are 3 government ownerships, 7 joint venture and
17 Nepalese invest only banks, for the research only Agriculture Development Bank,
Global Ime Bank Limited, NABIL Bank Limited, Himalayan Bank Limited and
Siddhartha Bank Limited, had taken as a sample.

In the study, stratified random sampling method is used and where whole populations
divide in to three sub groups and five samples taken from three groups. 5 years data is
used from the period of 2073/74 to 2077/78. In the study, one banks selected from
three government ownership banks, two banks selected from seven joint ventures
banks and three banks selected from seventeen Nepalese invest only banks.
26

List of Sample Commercial Banks

S. N. Name of Commercial Banks Symbol

1 Agriculture Development Bank Limited ADBL

2 Global Ime Bank Limited GBIME

3 NABIL Bank Limited NABIL

4 Himalayan Bank Limited HBL

5 Siddhartha Bank Limited SBL

3.4 Nature and Sources of Data

The nature of data is quantitative, where data collected in the form of quantity.

The study is conducted on the basis of secondary data. Secondary data refers to those
for already collected by others. Secondary data obtained from internal and external
sources. The study basically followed external secondary data include, annual report
of selected banks. Another data and information are collected from external sources
may include books, published and unpublished reports, related articles, official
documents, government publication, technical and trade journal and findings.

3.5 Data Collection Procedures

Data was gathered from annual reports from several fiscal years (from 2073–74 to
2077–78), which the banks released on their official websites. The digital version of
the annual report was downloaded from the banks' official website and utilized to
compile the data pertaining to the relevant variables for study. Various papers,
journals, dissertations, and other materials included in the literature review have been
retrieved from the internet.

3.6 Data Processing Procedure and Data analysis Tools

Data processing is a method of gathering unprocessed data and converting it into


information that can be used. Data were coded, edited, and classified after being
collected from multiple sources and then organized into a systematic presentation.
Selected and examined in the form of a table and chart were the necessary facts. An
essential component of the study was the presentation and analysis of the data. To
27

assess the data gathered and accomplish the study's goal, a variety of financial and
statistical methods were used. The data analyses were carried out in accordance with
the patterns of the data that were accessible. In this study, simple analytical statistical
procedures like graphing, correlation analysis, and regression analysis were used due
to a lack of time and resources.

In the same way, some strong financial tools, ratio analysis and trend analysis, were
used in the study. The data extracted from annual report, financial highlights and
other available information were processed and tabulated in various tables and charts
under different headings according to the nature. The various tools applied in this
study, are present as follows:

Financial Tools

To assess the bank's financial strength and weaknesses, financial instruments are
employed. Financial tools like profitability ratio and capital adequacy ratio analysis
have been applied in the research effort.

Trend Analysis

Data from several time periods are gathered and plotted on a graph for further analysis
as part of the trend analysis approach. Bar charts and various line graphs are included
in the study's trend analysis.

One of the simplest and most popular methods for displaying the majority of the
gathered business and economic data is a bar chart. Particularly suitable for
categorical data or series, these are. The data is presented in Graph in a
straightforward, understandable format. In research, various bar graph types are used.
The study included several bar graphs.

Relationships between independent and dependent values of many types of data are
represented by different line graphs. It is employed to depict patterns throughout a
given period of time. Each value is represented by a point on the graph, which is
connected by a line.

Profitability Ratios

The profitability ratio displays the company's overall profitability. Profitability Ratios
are used to assess a company's operational effectiveness in terms of profitability. It
serves as a gauge of an institution's financial performance. This suggests that stronger
28

bank financial performance is correlated with higher profitability ratios and vice
versa.

Different metrics of profitability exist. Return on equity, interest-to-earnings spread,


gross margin, operational profit margin, and net profit margin are some examples of
financial metrics.

The researcher commonly used profitability indicators are Rturn on assets and
Return on equity. The NRB assume return on total assets as a main indicator of
commercial banks profitability. Though different indicators can be used to measure
the profitability of Agriculture Development Bank Ltd, Global IME Bank Ltd,
NABIL Bank Ltd, Himalayan Bank Ltd and Siddhartha Bank Ltd, is evaluated
through following different ratios.

3.6.1Statistical Tools

Tools for descriptive and inferential statistics were employed in the study to achieve
the goal of the data collected throughout a number of periods.

Maximum, minimum, mean, and standard deviation have been employed in


descriptive statistics

Inferential statistics where as correlation and regression analysis is used in the study
for analyze the relationship between the selected dependent and independent
variables. It also identifies the impact of independent variable on dependent variables.
Multiple regressions model is used to explore the impact of profitability position of
sample commercial banks.

3.7 Research Framework and Definition of Variable

Research framework is the basis or foundation upon which the study is established. It
is within the framework of this theory that the whole study proceeds. Research
framework the relationships among the variables, elaborate the theory, underlying
these relations and describe the nature and direction of the relationship. A good
research framework is the logical base for developing testable hypothesis. In the
study, bank capital, bank deposit, bank size, bank lending and capital adequacy ratio
shown in the independent variable and bank profitability shown in dependent variable.
29

Conceptual Framework and Variable of Profitability Analysis of Commercial


Bank in Nepal

Independent Variable Dependent Variable


Bank Capital

Bank Deposit Profitability

Bank Lending (ROA, ROE)

Bank Size

CAR
Source: Mishra, Kandel & Aithal (2021).

Definition of variable

Independent variable

Sekaran (2012) said the independent variable positively or negatively influenced the
dependent variable. Independent variable is the variable the experiment or
manipulates or changes and is assumed to have a direct effect on the dependent
variable. It is not influenced by other variable, so that it is called independent
variables. It explains an event or outcomes.

The research work has been used bank profitability specific indicators such as Bank
Capital (BC), Bank Deposit (BD), Bank Lending (BL), Bank Size (BS) and Capital
Adequacy Ratio (CAR) as explanatory variables. The definition of selected variables
is showed in the following paragraphs.

i. Bank Capital
The difference between a bank's assets and liabilities, or bank capital, is what
investors view as the bank's net worth or equity value. Ordinary shares and
irredeemable preference shares are both included in the bank's share capital.

ii. Bank Deposit


Money deposited in a bank for storage is referred to as a bank deposit.
30

It displays the amounts that customers have deposited into various accounts. Banks
will accept deposits from both domestic and international clients. Commercial banks
only have one main duty: accepting deposits.

iii. Bank Lending


Bank lending is the procedure by which banks grant loans to clients on the basis of
short- and long-term repayment plans. It represents the customer loan advance. In
accordance with certain rules and regulations, banks offer loan facilities to their
clients. Bank performance is impacted by the risk component in bank loans.

iv. Bank Size

Bank size is measured as the natural logarithm of the value of total assets or liability
and equity in Nepalese rupees. Large bank size indicates easier to raisins of banks
capital and large bank size covering large market. Bank size is the bank specific
factors which determine the bank profit.

v. Capital Adequacy Ratio

It is the ratio of a bank capital in relation to its risk weighted assets and current
liabilities. Capital Adequacy Ratio is also called capital to risk weighted assets ratio.
CAR is an international standard, which measured a bank's risk of insolvency from
excessive losses (Chandulal, 2016). It is a sum total of tier-1 capital ratio plus tier-2
capital ratio. It can be express as following formula.

𝑇𝑖𝑒𝑟−1 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 +𝑇𝑖𝑒𝑟−2 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙


CAR =
𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑘 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠

As per NRB total capital (tier one plus tier two capital) less certain deductions to total
risk weighted credit exposure to be not less than 10 percent

Dependent variable

The variable being tested and measured in an experiment is known as a dependent


variable, and it depends on independent variables. If the values of these variables
depend on other factors, they are known as dependent variables (Pant, 2016). The
researcher objective is to research work, prediction the variability in the dependent
variables. The study has been used banks profitability specific parameters such as
Return on assets (ROA) and Return on equity (ROE) as dependent variables. The
definition of selected dependent variables is as following paragraph.
31

i. Return on assets
Return on assets shows how a bank's earnings stack up against its entire holdings. A
bank's ROA shows how effectively it uses all of its assets. The financial performance
of banks is higher and vice versa with better asset utilization. Increased ROA
increases bank profitability. It is demonstrated in the formula below.

𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑰𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆
ROA= 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑨𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒕𝒔

ii. Return on Equity

It shows the banks' capacity to use the money from the shareholders. When banks use
shareholders' money wisely, their equity returns rises, which improves their profits.

Return is another metric used to assess a bank's success. It can be expressed using the
formula below.

𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒
ROE= 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟′𝑠 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦
32

CHAPTER IV

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The findings and a description of the study's goal are covered in this chapter. Tables
and graphics are used in this chapter to present the study's data. This chapter includes
trend analysis, descriptive statistics, a correlation matrix, a regression analysis, data
interpretation, and conclusions and discussion. It was structured as follows: initially, a
descriptive statistical analysis of the variables. The correlation analysis's second
finding. The third is a regression analysis's outcome. In the fourth portion, the
explanation of the outcome is included. The discussion of the findings/results is now
complete.

4.1 Results

This component of the study will look at the Nepali commercial bank that was chosen
for the analysis of profitability. These key variables that influence financial
performance are taken into account for analysis.

4.1.1 Data Presentation and Analysis

This section discusses the study's descriptive and inferential statistics. The study of
trends, descriptive statistics of the variables, correlation analysis, results, and
regression analysis results are all explained.

Trend Analysis

Figure 4.1

Trend Analysis of Bank capital ( Rs. in million)


33

Source: Annual report of sample banks

Figure 4.1 shows the bank capital of selected commercial banks in Nepal. All banks
have increasing trends of banks capital in the study period. Bank capital of Global
Ime Bank is high in fiscal year 2077 to 2078 because different financial institutions
merged with Global Ime Bank.

Figure 4.2

Trend Analysis of Bank Deposit ( Rs. in million)

Source: Annual report of sample banks

Figure 2 depicts the bank deposit of selected commercial bank in Nepal. All banks
have growth trends of banks deposit in sample period. Fiscal year 2076/77 to 2o77/78
Global Ime Bank has highest bank deposit by customers. It has high number of branch
all over Nepal and outside of Nepal.
34

Figure 4.3

Trend analysis of Bank Lending (Rs. in million)

Source: Annual report of sample banks

Figure 4.3 reveals that bank lending of sample banks in sample periods. Bank lending
of all banks have increasing trends. In fourth and fifth year Global Ime Bank give
high level of loan and advance to its customer than others banks.
35

Figure 4.4

Trend Analysis of Bank size (Rs.in million)

Source: Annual report of sample banks

Figure 4.4 present the bank size of selected commercial banks. Each bank has
increasing trend of bank size in the sample periods. Till 2076 Nabil Bank has high
bank size but 2077 and 2078 Global Ime Bank has high bank size.

Figure 4.5

Trend Analysis of Capital Adequacy Ratio (in percent)


36

Source: Annual report of sample banks

Figure 4.5 shows capital adequacy ratio of sample banks from the periods 2073/74 to
2077/78. In above figure the capital adequacy ratio of ADBL is decreasing trend from
fiscal year 2075/76. But except GBIL other banks capital adequacy ratio line slow
fluctuations.

Figure 4.6

Trend analysis of ROE (in percent)

Source: Annual report of sample banks

Figure 4.6 show the return on equity of sample banks from the periods 2073/74 to
2077/78. The SBL has increasing trends of return on equity. The other sample bank
has more fluctuating of return or not consistency.
37

Figure 4.7

Trend analysis of ROA(in percent)

Source: Annual report of sample banks

Figure 4.7 reveals return on assets of sample banks from fiscal year 2073/74 to
2077/78. After the period of 2076/77 the GIBL and NABIL has increasing trend of
return on asset. The ADBL, HBL and SBL have fluctuating and decreases from
2076/77 period.

Analysis of Descriptive Statistics of the Variables

The descriptive statistics of independent and dependent variables for selected


commercial banks in Nepal for fiscal year (FY) 2073/74- 2077/78 was presented on
the following table to measure mean, median, maximum value, minimum value and
standard deviation of different variables such as dependent variables (ROE and ROA)
and independent variables (Bank Capital, Bank Deposit, Bank Lending, Bank Size
and CAR).
38

Table 4.1

Descriptive Statistics of the Variables

Observation
Variables (N) Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

BC 25 6491.62 21632.50 11085.9655 3808.00050

BD 25 77317.56 268433.79 137711.9174 46749.84244

BL 25 65511.59 228651.43 117962.9155 41162.06465

BS 25 89901.51 345423.26 173094.3056 62919.79541

CAR 25 11.37 20.41 14.0280 2.86623

ROE 25 11.20 25.61 15.8164 3.37062

ROA 25 1.06 2.77 1.8196 .47077

Source: Calculated from SPSS Software

Table no. 4.1 shows that, the mean value of bank capital is NPR 11085.965 millions.
It indicates the average value that the selected banks issues securities and the standard
deviation is NPR 3808.0050 millions. It indicates how much it deviates from the
average to both sides. The minimum and maximum value for bank capital is
NPR6491.62 millions and NPR21632.50 millions respectively. It indicates minimum
and maximum securities issues by banks.

The average value of bank deposit is NPR137771.9114 millions. It indicates average


value of customer deposit in banks and standard deviation is NPR46749.84244
millions. The minimum and maximum value bank deposit is NPR73317.56 millions
39

and NPR268433.79 millions respectively. It indicates minimum and maximum


deposit in selected banks.

The mean value of bank lending is NPR11762.9155 millions. It represents the average
value of loan and advance to customer by selected commercial banks and standard
deviation is NPR41162.06465 millions. It shows the how much it deviate from
average to both size. The minimum and maximum loan give to its customer by banks
is NPR65511.59 million and NPR228651.43 million respectively.

The mean value of bank size is NPR173094.056 millions. It represents the average
value of total assets or total liabilities and equity of selected banks and standard
deviation is NPR62919.79541 million. The minimum and maximum size of bank is
NPR89901.51 million and NPR345423.26 million respectively.

The mean value of capital adequacy ratio is 14.028 percent, which indicates that
average value of bank capital to its risk weighted assets. It has standard deviation is
2.86630 percent. The minimum and maximum capital adequacy ratio is 11.37 percent
and 20.41 percent.

Banks return on equity shows a mean of 15.6164 percent, which indicates the average
value that selected commercial banks gain on average with related to its shareholders
equity and standard deviation is 3.37062 percent. The maximum and minimum value
for return on equity is 11.20 percent and 25.61 percent respectively. It indicates
minimum and maximum return of selected banks during the period.

The mean value of return on assets is 1.8196 percent. It indicates the average value
that the sample banks earn on average related to its assets and standard deviation is
0.47077 percent. The minimum and maximum value for return on assets is 1.06
percent and 2.77 percent respectively. It represents the minimum and maximum return
earn by sample banks.

Correlation Analysis

Correlation is a popular statistical tool, it represents the how strongly two variables
are related to each other's or it gives information about degree and direction of
relationship between two variables. It is measured by the correlation coefficient.
Correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to +1. When one variable is shift in the same
direction it is called positive correlation. It means one variable increase then other
40

variable also increase in same proposition and vice versa. Negative correlation, where
as variables are not correlated each other. It means if one variable increase then other
variable decrease by same direction. Under research work the objective of
correlation is to find out the empirical relationship between independent and
dependent variables.

Table 4.2

Correlation matrix between variables

Pearson Correlation BC BD BL BS CAR ROE ROA


BC 1 .

BD .730** 1
.000
BL .796** .984** 1
.000 .000
BS .762** .995** .994** 1
.000 .000 .000 .
CAR .422* -.086 -.011 -.042 1
.036 .683 .958 .841
ROE -.590** -.284 -.373 -.339 -.548** 1
.002 .168 .066 .098 .005
ROA -.260 -.420* -.445* -.437* .393 .470* 1
.209 .037 .026 .029 .052 .018
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Source: Calculated from SPSS Software

Correlation between Dependent variable and Independent variables

Table no.4.2 shows that the Pearson correlation coefficient between the dependent
and independent variables taken in the research work. It reveals that correlation
41

coefficient of ROA with BD, BL and BS are 0.420, 0.445 and 0.47 respectively,
which indicates there is significant negative relationship between ROA and BD, BL
and BS at 5% significant level of 2- tailed test. It indicates the above showed variable
increase, the profitability of banks decrease and vice versa. The bank loan and deposit
not properly utilized. In addition, the correlation coefficient of ROA with CAR is
0.393, which indicates positive relationship but ROA with BS is 0.260, which indicate
negative relationship ROA and BS but both are not statistically significant.

In contrast, as table no.4.2 shows that the result of correlation coefficient of ROE with
BC and CAR are 0.590 and 0.548 which explain there is significant negative
relationship between ROE with BC and CAR at 1% significant level of 2- tailed test.
It indicates the higher the BC and CAR leads to lower the banks profit. In others, the
result of correlation coefficient of ROE with BD, BL and BS are 0.284,0. 373 and
0.339 which indicates negative relationship between them and that is not statistically
significant.

Multiple Regression Analysis

Multiple regression analysis is the statistical tool, which can be used to forecasting the
relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The objective of
multiple regression analysis is to use the independent variables whose values are
known to forecast the value of the single dependent value. The correlation between
two variables is in sufficient to determine the estimation equation. So that, determine
the estimation equation which describe the relationship with greater accuracy.

ROE as a Dependent variable

Table 4.3

ROE Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of


Model R R Square Square the Estimate
1 .744a .554 .436 2.53116
Source: Calculated from SPSS Software
a. Predictors: (Constant), CAR, LN_BS, LN_BC, LN_BD,
LN_BL
Dependent Variable: ROE
42

Table no.4.3 presents the model summary of the regression analysis between the
independent variables (CAR, BD, BC, BL and BS) and dependent variable (ROE).
The R column show the multiple correlation coefficient value is 0.744, which
indicates the good level of prediction. R square column present R square value, also
called coefficient of determination. It tells us what percent of variability in the
dependent variable accepted for by the regression on the independent variables.

In the table value of R square is 0.554, it means that 55.4% ROE explained by bank
capital, bank deposit, bank lending, capital adequacy ratio and bank size and
remaining 44.60% is explained by other factors. Next value adjusted R square is a
modified variable of R square that has been adjusted for number of predictors in the
model. In the above table shown adjusted R square is 0.436, it indicates 43.60% is
explained by different factors. Moreover, standard error of estimates is 2.53116
indicates the variation of the observing value of ROE from regression line is 2.53116
units.

Statistical significance

The F- ratio in the ANOVA table test by overall regression model is fit for data or not.
The P value is lower than alpha value (0.05), that independent variables statistically
significant predict over dependent variable otherwise it is not significant.

Table 4.4

Analysis of Variance

Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 150.938 5 30.188 4.712 .006b
Residual 121.729 19 6.407
Total 272.667 24
Source: Calculated from SPSS Software

a. Dependent Variable: ROE

b. Predictors: (Constant), CAR, LN_BS, LN_BC, LN_BD, LN_BL


43

The table no.4.4 ANOVA result shows that P value less than alpha value
(0.006<0.05). It means there is significant relationship between independent variable
(BC, BD, BL, BS and CAR) and dependent variable (ROE). The ANOVA with F-
statistic of 4.712 is show the overall regression model is fit for data.

Coefficient Matrix

Coefficient matrix shows the statistically effect each of over independent variables on
dependent variable.

Table 4.5

ROE Coefficient Matrix

Unstandardized Coefficients
Model B Std. Error t Sig.
1 (Constant) 46.949 24.598 1.909 .072
LN_BC -4.479 4.455 -1.005 .327
LN_BD 24.856 17.278 1.439 .0167
LN_BL -8.272 18.305 -.452 .656
LN_BS -15.278 25.788 -.592 .561
CAR -.211 .289 -.729 .475
Source: Calculated from SPSS Software

The theoretical model of regression equation:

𝑌 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1𝑋1 + 𝛽2 𝑋2 + 𝛽3 𝑋3 + 𝛽4 𝑋4 + 𝛽5 𝑋5 + 𝜀

Model 1

ROE= 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 LN_BC + 𝛽2 LN_BD + 𝛽3 LN_BL + 𝛽4 LN_ BS + 𝛽5 LN_ CAR + 𝜀

Where,

Y = Dependent variable.

𝛽0 = Constant.

𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , 𝛽3 , 𝛽4 &𝛽5 are parameters of the independent variables.


44

. 𝑋1 , 𝑋2 , 𝑋3 , 𝑋4 & 𝑋5 are independent variables.

LN_BC = Natural Log of Bank Capital.

LN_BD = Natural Log of Bank Deposit.

LN_BL = Natural Log of Bank Lending.

LN_BS = Natural Log of Bank Size.

CAR = Capital Adequacy Ratio.

𝜀 = Error.

The established regression equation is ROE = 46.949 – 4.479* bank capital +


24.856* bank deposit – 8.272* bank lending – 15.278*bank size – 0.211* CAR + 𝜀

Table 4.5 shows the regression result for the factors effecting profitability position
and determining factors of selected commercial banks in Nepal in the study period.
The results reveal that bank deposit and return on equity has positive relationship with
beta coefficient 24.856. Except bank deposit no coefficients are to be found
statistically significant at 5% level of significant. Since P- value of bank deposit is
less than 5%, this result is statistically significant at 5%. Higher bank deposit leads to
higher bank profit. 1% change in bank deposit causes 24.85% change in return on
equity.

ROA as a Dependent variable

Table 4.6
ROA Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate
.686a .471 .332 .38488
1
Source: Calculated from SPSS Software
a. Predictors: (Constant), CAR, LN_BS, LN_BC, LN_BD,
LN_BL
Dependent Variable: ROA
45

The table no.4.6 describes the model summary of the regression analysis between the
independent variables, (BC, BD, BL, BS and CAR) and dependent variable (ROA).
The column R shows the multiple correlation coefficient value is 0.686; it indicates
the good level of prediction. R square column present R square value, also called
coefficient of determination, which tells us what percent of variability in the
dependent variable accepted for by the regression on the independent variable. In
above table value of R square is o.471, which means the 47.10% variation in ROA
explained by bank capital, deposit, lending, size and capital adequacy ratio and
remaining 52.90% is explained by other factors. Adjusted R square is comparing the
explanatory power of the regression model. The adjusted R square is a modified
variable of R square that has been adjusted for no. of prediction in the model. The
above table shows adjusted R square is 0.332, it indicate 33.20% variation in ROA is
explained by other factors. Standard error of estimate is 0.38488 which indicates the
variation of the observing value of ROA from regression line is 0.38488 units.

Statistical significance

The F- ratio in the ANOVA table test by overall regression model is fit for data or not.
The P value is lower than alpha value (0.05), that independent variables statistically
significant predict over dependent variable otherwise it is not significant.

Table 4.7

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

Sum of
Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 2.504 5 .501 3.381 .024b
Residual 2.815 19 .148
Total 5.319 24
Source: Calculated from SPSS Software
a. Dependent Variable: ROA
b. Predictors: (Constant), CAR, LN_BS, LN_BC, LN_BD, LN_BL
The table no.4.7 ANOVA result shows that P value less than alpha value
(0.024<0.05). It means there is significant relationship between independent variable
46

(BC, BD, BL, BS and CAR) and dependent variable (ROA). The ANOVA with F-
statistic of 3.381 is show the overall regression model is fit for data. The F- value
proved that there is a significant relationship between independent variable and
dependent variable (ROA).

Coefficient Matrix

Coefficient matrix shows the statistically effect each of over independent variables on
dependent variable.

Table 4.8

ROA Coefficient Matrix

Unstandardized Coefficients
Model B Std. Error t Sig.
1 (Constant) 4.415 3.740 1.180 .252
LN_BC -.849 .677 -1.253 .225
LN_BD 3.996 2.627 1.521 .145
LN_BL -.293 2.783 -.105 .917
LN_BS -3.360 3.921 -.857 .402
CAR .137 .044 3.107 .006

Source: Calculated from SPSS Software

Dependent Variable: ROA

The theoretical model of regression equation:

𝑌 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 𝑋1 + 𝛽2 𝑋2 + 𝛽3 𝑋3 + 𝛽4 𝑋4 + 𝛽5 𝑋5 + 𝜀

Model 2

ROA= 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 LN_BC + 𝛽2 LN_BD + 𝛽3 LN_BL + 𝛽4 LN_ BS + 𝛽5 LN_ CAR + 𝜀

Where,

Y = Dependent variable
47

𝛽0 = Constant

𝛽1 , 𝛽2 , 𝛽3 , 𝛽4 &𝛽5 are parameters of the independent variables.

𝑋1 , 𝑋2 , 𝑋3 , 𝑋4 & 𝑋5 are independent variables.

LN_BC = Natural Log of Bank Capital.

LN_BD = Natural Log of Bank Deposit.

LN_BL = Natural Log of Bank Lending.

LN_BS = Natural Log of Bank Size.

CAR = Capital Adequacy Ratio.

𝜀 = Error

The established regression equation is ROA = 4.415 – 0.849* bank capital + 3.996*

bank deposit – 0.293* bank lending – 3.360*bank size + 0.137* CAR + 𝜀

Table no.4.8 shows the regression result for the factors effecting profitability and
determining factors of selected commercial banks in Nepal in the study period. The
result reveals that bank deposit and CAR are positively related with banks return on
assets and beta coefficient 3.396 & 0.137. Higher bank deposit and CAR leads to
higher banks profit. Except CAR, no coefficients are found to be statistically
significant at 5% level of significant. Since P- value of CAR is less than 5 percent,
this result is statistically significant at 5 percent. Higher CAR leads to higher banks
profit. 1% change in capital adequacy ratio causes 13.7% change in return on asset.

4.1.2 Findings

According to sample commercial banks collected data major finding of the research
study are as follows.

i. From the trend analysis the bank capital, deposit, lending and size values
increase in every year of sample commercial banks.
48

ii. Through the trend analysis of capital adequacy ratio, return on equity and
return on assets the trend line of Agriculture Development Bank is more
fluctuating than other sample banks.
iii. From the above analysis the study found the mean value of return on assets
and return on equity is 1.8196 and 15.8164 percent respectively. It represents
the average value of selected commercial banks earn on average with relates to
proper utilization of assets and equity. The standard deviation of return on
asset and return on equity is 0.47077 and 3.3762 percent, indicates the how
much deviation from mean to both sides. The maximum value of ROA and
ROE is 2.77 and 25.61 percent. The minimum value of ROA and ROE is 1.06
and 11.20 percent. It means maximum and minimum return, which can be gain
by sample commercial banks.
iv. Commercial banks have Bank capital, Bank deposit, Bank lending, Bank size
and Capital adequacy ratio shows a mean value of NPR 11085.9655,
137711.9174, 117962.9155, 173094.3056 and 14.0280 percent and standard
deviation of BC, BD, BL, BS and CAR is NPR 3808.00050, 46749.84244,
41162.06465, 62919.79541 and 2.86623 percent. It means how much it
deviates from mean to both sides. The minimum values are NPR 6491.62,
77317.56, 65511.59, 89901.51 and 11.37 percent and maximum values are
21632.50, 268433.79, 228651.43, 345423.26 and 20.41 percent respectively.
v. Correlation result depicts the positive relation between return on assets and
return on equity but return on assets has negative relation with BD, BL and
BS. Moreover, return on equity has positive relation with return on assets and
negative with BC and CAR.
vi. Multiple regression analysis present there is beta coefficient of bank capital,
lending and size are negative to ROA, which implies that larger the beta
coefficient of BC, BL and BS lower would be the return on assets and these
results are statistically not significant. Beta coefficient of bank deposit is
positive to ROA, but result is statistically not significant. Since p- value of
CAR is less than 5 percent, the result is statistically significant at 5 percent
level. 1% change in capital adequacy ratio causes 13.7% change in return on
asset.
49

Moreover, except bank deposit no coefficients are to be found statistically


significant at 5% level of significant. Since P- value of bank deposit is less
than 5%, this result is statistically significant at 5%. Higher bank deposit leads
to higher bank profit. 1% change in bank deposit causes 24.85% change in
return on equity.

4.2 Discussion

According to sample commercial banks collected data the major discussions of the
research study are as follows.

i. Trend analysis of bank capital, deposit, lending and size shows the amount
increase of every year, which shows in figure 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4. It indicates
these variables values is increasing trend of sample banks in future. The trend
analysis present the Global Ime Bank has the highest bank capital, deposit,
lending and size.
ii. Trend analysis of capital adequacy ratio, return on equity and return on assets
depicts the Agriculture Development Bank is more fluctuating than other
sample banks. It show figure 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.
iii. The mean value of bank capital is NPR11085.965 millions. It indicates the
average value that the selected banks issues securities and the standard
deviation is NPR3808.0050 millions. It indicates how much it deviates from
the average to both sides. The minimum and maximum value for bank capital
is NPR6491.62 millions and NPR21632.50 millions respectively. It indicates
minimum and maximum securities issues by banks.
iv. The average value of bank deposit is NPR137771.9114 millions. It indicates
average value of customer deposit in banks and standard deviation is
NPR46749.84244 millions. The minimum and maximum value bank deposit is
NPR73317.56 millions and NPR268433.79 millions respectively. It indicates
minimum and maximum deposit in selected banks.
v. The mean value of bank lending is NPR11762.9155 millions. It represents the
average value of loan and advance to customer by selected commercial banks
and standard deviation is NPR41162.06465 millions. It shows the how much it
deviate from average to both size. The minimum and maximum loan give to
50

its customer by banks is NPR65511.59 million and NPR228651.43 million


respectively.
vi. The mean value of bank size is NPR173094.056 millions. It represents the
average value of total assets or total liabilities and equity of selected banks and
standard deviation is NPR62919.79541 million. The minimum and maximum
size of bank is NPR89901.51 million and NPR345423.26 million respectively.
vii. The mean value of capital adequacy ratio is 14.028 percent, which indicates
that average value of bank capital to its risk weighted assets. It has standard
deviation is 2.86630 percent. The minimum and maximum capital adequacy
ratio is 11.37 percent and 20.41 percent.
viii. Banks return on equity shows a mean of 15.6164 percent, which indicates the
average value that selected commercial banks gain on average with related to
its shareholders equity and standard deviation is 3.37062 percent. The
maximum and minimum value for return on equity is 11.20 percent and 25.61
percent respectively. It indicates minimum and maximum return of selected
banks during the period.
ix. The mean value of return on assets is 1.8196 percent. It indicates the average
value that the sample banks earn on average related to its assets and standard
deviation is 0.47077 percent. The minimum and maximum value for return on
assets is 1.06 percent and 2.77 percent respectively. It represents the minimum
and maximum return earn by sample banks.
x. Correlation result depicts the positive relation between return on assets and
return on equity but return on assets has negative relation with BD, BL and
BS. Moreover, return on equity has positive relation with return on assets and
negative with BC and CAR. Mishra, kandel & Aithal (2021) in the study
found return on assets is positively related with banks size and return on
equity. It shows higher bank size and return on equity leads to higher banks
profit in Nepalese commercial banks. Gautam (2018) in his study shows that
return on assets is positive relation with capital adequacy ratio. It means
higher the capital adequacy ratio higher would be bank return.
vii. Multiple regression analysis present there is beta coefficient of bank capital,
lending and size are negative to ROA, which implies that larger the beta
coefficient of BC, BL and BS lower would be the return on assets and these
51

results are statistically not significant. Beta coefficient of bank deposit is


positive to ROA, but result is statistically not significant. Since p- value of
CAR is less than 5 percent, the result is statistically significant at 5 percent
level. 1% change in capital adequacy ratio causes 13.7% change in return on
asset.
Moreover except bank deposit no coefficients are to be found statistically
significant at 5% level of significant. Since P- value of bank deposit is less
than 5%, this result is statistically significant at 5%. Higher bank deposit leads
to higher bank profit. 1% change in bank deposit causes 24.85% change in
return on equity. Bhattrai (2017) in his study there is strong positive
relationship bank size and banks profitability (ROA & ROE). It shows that
large banks size get higher economic scale and able to produce services at cost
efficiency, which positively affect the profitability on Nepalese commercial
bank.
52

CHAPTER V

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

This chapter deals with the summary, conclusions and recommendation in relation to
profitability analysis of sample commercial banks in Nepal. This chapter is divided
into three sections: a first portion that summarizes the study; a second section that
draws conclusions; and a third section that offers recommendations based on the
findings.

5.1 Summary

Generally profit is the defined as the excess of revenue over cost. In other words,
profit is the residual income, which is equal to sale proceeds minus costs. Each
organization had primary goal is profit earn except sociable organization. Profit is the
essential for every business organizations because survive and growth in long time at
competitive business environment. The term profitability means capacity of business
or organization to earn profit. The word profitability may be defined as the ability or
generating of the given investment to earn return on its use.

Profitability analysis is one of the key tools for financial decision and assist in making
plan before using sophisticated forecasting and budgeting procedure. The value of this
approach is the quantitative relation, which can be used to diagnose strengths and
weakness in a bank performance. Such analysis is considerable things for the bank’s
common stock holders, investors, bondholders and others.

Commercial bank is the financial institution which provides banking service to the
public. Commercial banks play significant role of economic development of country.
Its main objective is to earn profit. It provide banking services to public like as accept
deposit, provide loan, fund transfer, agent function, foreign exchange and open L/C.
The study in this context is mainly focused on the performance of the bank in terms of
profitability. The general objective of this study is to explore the profitability position
and its determining factors of commercial banks in Nepal.

As per the objectives of these studies, it tries to identify the profitability position and
its determining factors of selected commercial banks in Nepal, to examine the
relationship of profitability with its determining factors of selected commercial banks
53

in Nepal and to analyze the profitability impact by its determining factors of selected
commercial banks in Nepal. The study basically follows the descriptive and analytical
research design. The population for this study consists of all the commercial banks in
Nepal and out of them five commercial banks has been selected as a sample i.e.
ADBL, GBIME, NABIL, HBL and SBL. The study used stratified random sampling
method.

This study is completely based on secondary method of data were collected for the
five year period i.e. from 2073/74 to 2077/78 and data has been obtained from banks
annual reports and banks websites. For the data analysis it has used financial ratio, bar
graph, multiple lines, pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression
analysis.

Trend analysis of bank capital, deposit, lending and size shows the amount increase of
every year, which shows in figure 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4. It indicates these variables
values is increasing trend of sample banks in future. The trend analysis present the
Global Ime Bank has the highest bank capital, deposit, lending and size.

Trend analysis of capital adequacy ratio, return on equity and return on assets depicts
the Agriculture Development Bank is more fluctuating than other sample banks. It
show figure 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.

From the above analysis the study found the mean value of return on assets and return
on equity is 1.8196 and 15.8164 percent respectively. It represents the average value
of selected commercial banks earn on average with relates to proper utilization of
assets and equity. The standard deviation of return on asset and return on equity is
0.47077 and 3.3762 percent, indicates the how much deviation from mean to both
sides. The maximum value of ROA and ROE is 2.77 and 25.61 percent. The
minimum value of ROA and ROE is 1.06 and 11.20 percent. It means maximum and
minimum return, which can be gain by sample commercial banks.

Commercial banks have Bank capital, Bank deposit, Bank lending, Bank size and
Capital adequacy ratio shows a mean value of NPR 11085.9655, 137711.9174,
117962.9155, 173094.3056 and 14.0280 percent and standard deviation of BC, BD,
BL, BS and CAR is NPR 3808.00050, 46749.84244, 41162.06465, 62919.79541 and
2.86623 percent. It means how much it deviates from mean to both sides. The
minimum values are NPR 6491.62, 77317.56, 65511.59, 89901.51 and 11.37 percent
54

and maximum values are 21632.50, 268433.79, 228651.43, 345423.26 and 20.41
percent respectively.

Correlation result depicts the positive relation between return on assets and return on
equity but return on assets has negative relation with BD, BL and BS. Moreover,
return on equity has positive relation with return on assets and negative with BC and
CAR.

Multiple regression analysis present there is beta coefficient of bank capital, lending
and size are negative to ROA, which implies that larger the beta coefficient of BC, BL
and BS lower would be the return on assets and these results are statistically not
significant. Beta coefficient of bank deposit is positive to ROA, but result is
statistically not significant. Since p- value of CAR is less than 5 percent, the result is
statistically significant at 5 percent level. 1% change in capital adequacy ratio causes
13.7% change in return on asset.

Moreover except bank deposit no coefficients are to be found statistically significant


at 5% level of significant. Since P- value of bank deposit is less than 5%, this result is
statistically significant at 5%. Higher bank deposit leads to higher bank profit. 1%
change in bank deposit causes 24.85% change in return on equity.

5.2 Conclusion

Profitability is the ability to earn profit of any financial institutions. Every


organization has set the different goals. The primary goal of every business
organization is profit generate. The study used descriptive and analytical research
design and stratified random sampling method used to select sample from whole
population.

The study was conducted on five sample commercial banks in Nepal aimed to
examine the profitability position of commercial banks in Nepal. The secondary data
collected from financial statements of sample commercial banks for the period of five
year i.e. from 2073/74 to 2077/78. The study shown Return on Asset and Return on
equity as dependent variables and Bank Capital, Bank Deposit, Bank Lending, Bank
Size and Capital Adequacy Ratio are shown in independent variables. The study used
secondary quantitative data. Data analyzed by trend analysis, descriptive statistics and
regression model. Third, descriptive statistics used for the values for mean, maximum,
55

minimum and standard deviation was calculated by using SPSS to analyze how much
the value of variables fluctuates with its maximum and minimum and how much
variable deviate from average.

Trend analysis present increasing or decreasing the values in study periods. The
Global Ime Bank is increasing trend of bank capital, deposit, lending, size, CAR,
ROA and ROE.

Correlation result depicts the positive relation between return on assets and return on
equity but return on assets has negative relation with BD, BL and BS. It means higher
the bank deposit, lending and size lower the banks return. Banks does not properly
utilized deposit, loan and assets. Moreover, return on equity has positive relation with
return on assets and negative with BC and CAR.

To draw conclusion multiple regression model has been used by considering


profitability (ROA) as dependent variable and bank capital, bank deposit, bank
lending, bank size and CAR. The positive relation of return on assets with CAR, it
indicates that higher CAR leads higher ROA. Negative relation of return on assets
with bank capital, lending and size, which implies that larger the beta coefficient of
bank capital, lending and size, the lower would be the return on assets and these
results are statistically not significant. Beta coefficient of bank deposit is positive to
ROA, but result is statistically not significant. Since p- value of CAR is less than 5
percent, the result is statistically significant at 5 percent level. 1% change in capital
adequacy ratio causes 13.7% change in return on asset.

Moreover except bank deposit no coefficients are to be found statistically significant


at 5% level of significant. Since P- value of bank deposit is less than 5%, this result is
statistically significant at 5%. Higher bank deposit leads to higher bank profit. 1%
change in bank deposit causes 24.85% change in return on equity. It concluded that
capital adequacy ratio significant impact on return on assets and bank deposit impact
on return on equity. Capital adequacy ratio and bank deposit significantly impact on
bank profit on Nepalese commercial banks.

5.3 Implications

Commercial banks have a big impact on how trade, industry, and commerce grow in a
country. Commercial banks are currently under pressure from Nepal Rastra Bank to
56

combine and acquire. It has numerous issues, such as a lack of investments in


productive industries, a lack of banking competition between institutions, political
influence within banks, a lack of contemporary technology within banks, a lack of
direction and control, etc.

Based on the major findings of the study of the sample commercial banks in Nepal,
the following implications are highlighted.

i. Bank profitability has strong positive relation with bank deposit. Hence,
Nepalese commercial banks have to consideration for the efficient and
effective utilization of bank deposit to increase banks profit and its value.
ii. In this research work only private and public sector banks have been selected
for analysis of banks profitability but this can be extended by increases the
sample size i.e. development banks, finance company, microfinance and co-
operatives.
iii. The research work is completely based on secondary data, which may be
extended by taking opinions of top level employees of banks about financial
performance of banks, which may support researcher to identifying factors
responsible of profitability analysis of banks.
iv. Before investment in commercial banks the investor reviews the profitability
position of commercial banks for better return in future.
v. Trend analysis show bank capital, deposit, lending and size values are
increasing trend. Hence, Nepalese commercial banks consideration for proper
utilization of banks assets to maximize the profit.

Scope for Further Research work

The major scopes for further research work are as follows.

i. The study may serve as literature and a direction for future research.
ii. The study helps in predicting, comparing and evaluating the earning ability of
Nepalese commercial banks.
iii. The performance analysis of bank is useful to the policy maker to identify the
success or failure of bank and to adopt suitable strategy for success of bank.
iv. The study may be useful for investor for taking investing decision.
v. The techniques and methods employed in this study effort for profitability
analysis may be used by bankers.
REFERENCES

Abbas, F., Iqbal, S. & Aziz, B. (2019). The impact of bank capital, bank liquidity and
credit risk on profitability in post crisis period. A comparative study of US and
Asia. Congent Economics & Finance, 7:1, 1605683. doi: 10. 1080/23322039.
2019. 1605683

Adhikari, P. R. (2021). Efficiency, profitability and stability of Nepalese commercial


banks. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(2), 15-36.
doi:10.3126/batuk.v7i2.39497

Adhikari, A. (2018). Analysis on Liquidity and Profitability of commercial banks in


Nepal. An unpublished master's degree thesis submitted to faculty of
management, Tribhuvan University. www. tu.edu.np

Agriculture Development Bank Limited. (2017). Annual report for F.Y. 2016/17.

https://www.adbl.gov.np/documents/18/Annual_Report__ADBL_2073-
2074.pd

Agriculture Development Bank Limited. (2018). Annual report for F.Y. 2017/18.

https://www.adbl.gov.np/documents/19/Annual_Report__ADBL_2074-2075-
compressed.pdf

Agriculture Development Bank Limited. (2019). Annual report for F.Y. 2018/19.

https://www.adbl.gov.np/documents/20/Annual_Report__ADBL_2075-
2076.pdf
Agriculture Development Bank Limited. (2020). Annual report for F.Y. 2019/20.

https://www.adbl.gov.np/documents/122/Annual_Report_updated0770923_A
DBL_14th_2077-Website.pdf
Agriculture Development Bank Limited. (2021). Annual report for F.Y. 2020/21.

https://www.adbl.gov.np/documents/245/Annual_Report__ADBL_15th_2078
_compressed_P2OUORh.pdf
Aladwan, Dr. M. S. (2015). The Impact of bank size on profitability: An empirical
Study on listed Jordanian commercial banks. European Scientific Journal,
11(34), 1857-7881.

Alexiou, C., & Voyazas. S. (2009). Determinants of bank profitability: Evidence from
the Greek Banking Sector. Economic Annals, 54(182), 38-48.

AL-Jafari, M. K., & Alchami, M. (2014). Determinants of banking profitability:


Evidence from Syria. Journal of Applied Finance, & Banking, 4(1), 17-45.

American Psychological Association. (2022, January). Publication manual of the


American psychological association. In American Psychological Association
(Washington, District of Columbia), (No. 1, pp. 1-xxii). : American
Psychological Association.

Argent, J. (1968). Corporate Planning – A Practical Guide. London: Jorge Allen and
Unwin Publications.

Bapu, M. R. (2019). Research on profitability and liquidity position of banks with


reference to pre and post- merger. International Journal of Recent Technology
and Engineering, 8(1S4), 2277-3878.

Baral, J. (2018). A comparative study of profitability analysis of commercial banks in


Nepal. An unpublished master's degree thesis submitted to faculty of
management, Tribhuvan University. www. tu.edu.np

Berger, A. N., & Hannan, T. H. (1989). The Price-concentration relationship in


banking. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 291-299.

Bhandari, M. (2003). Corporate and business law. New Delhi: Best Word
Publications Pvt. Ltd.

Bhattarai, Y. R. (2017). Effect of non-performing Loan on the profitability of


commercial banks in Nepal. Prestige International Journal of Management
and Research, 10(2), 1-10.

Buchory, H. A. (2021). Analysis of funding strategy, credit performance, and banking


profitability. (Case study of CIMB- NIAGA bank in Indonesia). Estudios de
Economia Aplicada, 39-4, 1-9. dOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i4.4485
Chandulal, G. A., & Pithadia, V. (2016). A comparative study on financial
performance of private and public sector banks with special reference to
affecting factors and their impact on performance indicators: PhD
thesis (Doctoral dissertation, GA Chandulal).

Dahal, B. and Dahal, S. (2002). A hand book of banking. Kathmandu: Union Press
Pvt. Ltd.

Dao-Thanh, B. T., & Nguyen, D. P. (2020). Determinants of profitability in


commercial banks in Vietnam, Malaysia and Thailand. Journal of Asian
Finance, Economics and Business, 7(4), 133-143.
doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no4.133

Fisseha, F. L. (2015). Meta analysis on the determinants of commercial banks


profitability: (A conceptual frame work and modeling). European Scientific
Journal, 11(19), 323-344.

Gautam, R. (2018). Determinants of financial performance: An evidence from


Nepalese commercial banks. Amity Journal of Strategic Management, 1(2), 7-
13.

Global Ime Bank Limited. (2017). Annual report for F.Y. 2016/17.

https://globalimebank.com/assets/upload/reports/annual-report-2073-2074-[in-
english].pdf

Global Ime Bank Limited. (2018). Annual report for F.Y. 2017/18.

https://globalimebank.com/assets/upload/reports/annual-report-2074-75-
english.pdf

Global Ime Bank Limited. (2019). Annual report for F.Y. 2018/19.

https://globalimebank.com/assets/upload/reports/annual-report-2075-76-
english.pdf

Global Ime Bank Limited. (2020). Annual report for F.Y. 2019/20.

https://globalimebank.com/assets/upload/reports/gibl-annual-report-2019-
20.pdf
Global Ime Bank Limited. (2021). Annual report for F.Y. 2020/21.

https://globalimebank.com/assets/upload/reports/gibl-nepali-annual-report-fy-
2077-78.pdf

Goddard, J., Molyneux, P., & Willson, J. O. S. (2004). The profitability of the
European banks: A cross-sectional and dynamic panel analysis. The
Manchester School, 72(3), 363-381.

Gupta, S. C. (2018). Fundamentals of statistics. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House


Pvt. Ltd.

Hakuduwal, k. (2021). Impact of bank specific factors on profitability of Nepalese


commercial banks. Tribhuvan University journal, 36(1), 122-133.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/tujv36i01.43587

Himalayan Bank Limited. (2017). Annual report for F.Y. 2016/17

https://www.himalayanbank.com/images/pdf/uploaded/25th_annual_report.pd
f

Himalayan Bank Limited. (2018). Annual report for F.Y. 2017/18.

https://www.himalayanbank.com/images/pdf/uploaded/26th_annual_report-
np.pdf

Himalayan Bank Limited. (2019). Annual report for F.Y. 2018/19.

https://www.himalayanbank.com/images/pdf/uploaded/27th-annual-report-
np.pdf

Himalayan Bank Limited. (2020). Annual report for F.Y. 2019/20.

https://www.himalayanbank.com/images/pdf/uploaded/HBL%2028_Annual%
20Report%202076-077_final.pdf

Himalayan Bank Limited. (2021). Annual report for F.Y. 2020/21.

https://www.himalayanbank.com/images/pdf/uploaded/29th%20Annual%20R
eport%20as%20on%2015th%20July%202021.pdf
Hooshyari, N., & Moghanloo, A. P. (2015). Evaluating the impact of inflation on
profitability of banks. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and
Management Review, 4(9), 19-23.

Ishfaq, M. J., & Khan, N. U. (2015). Bank profitability, inflation cost-efficiency-A


case of Pakistan banks. International Journal of Business and Management
Review, 3(1), 41-53.

Infanta, Dr. A. V., & Ashwin, R. (2021). An analytical study of profitability analysis
of selected banks. NIU International Journal of Human Right, 8(IV), 168-173.

Islam, M. A., & Rana, R. H. (2017). Determinants of banks profitability for the
selected private banks in Bangladesh: a panel data analysis. Banks and Banks
System, 12(3), 178-192. doi:10.21511/bbs.12(3-1).2017. 03

Jha, S., & Hui, X. (2012). A Comparison of financial performance of commercial


banks: A case study of Nepal. African Journal of Business Management,
6(25), 7601-7611. doi: 10.5897/AJBM11.3073

Johson, E. (1940). Commercial bank management. New York: The Dryden Press
Private Limited.

Kothari, C. R. (1990). Research methodology method and techniques.New Delhi:


Willey Eastern Limited.

Kryeziu, N., & Hoxha, E. (2021). Factors affecting on banks Profitability: the case of
Euro-area countries. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan
Daerah, 9(1), 1-9. doi: 10.22437/ppd.v9i1.12165

Mishra, A. K., Kandel, D. R., & Aithal, P. S. (2021). Profitability in commercial bank
– A case from Nepal. International Journal of Case studies in Business IT,
and Education, 5(1), 61-77.
Nabil Bank Limited. (2017). Annual report for F.Y. 2016/17.

https://siteadmin.nabilbank.com/assets/backend/uploads/Documents/Annual%
20Report_16-17.pdf

Nabil Bank Limited. (2018). Annual report for F.Y. 2017/18.


https://siteadmin.nabilbank.com/assets/backend/uploads/Documents/Annual%
20Report%20_.pdf

Nabil Bank Limited. (2019). Annual report for F.Y. 2018/19.

https://siteadmin.nabilbank.com/assets/backend/uploads/Documents/Annual%
20Report%202018-19%20(2075-76)%20English.pdf

Nabil Bank Limited. (2020). Annual report for F.Y. 2019/20.

https://siteadmin.nabilbank.com/assets/backend/uploads/download/Annual%2
0Report%202019-20%20(English).pdf

Nabil Bank Limited. (2021). Annual report for F.Y. 2020/21.

https://siteadmin.nabilbank.com/assets/backend/uploads/Annual%20Report%2
02020-21%20(English)%20-%20For%20Website.pdf

Neupane, B. P. (2020). Profitability determinants of Nepalese commercial banks.


Istanbul Finance Congress, Vol.12-p.40-45.

Nuhiu, A., Hoti, A., & Bektashi, M. (2017). Determinants of commercial banks
profitability through analysis of financial indicators: Evidence from Kosovo.
Business Theory and Practice, 18: 160-170.
https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.017

Naceur, S. B. (2003). The determinants of the Tunisian banking industry profitability:


panel evidence. https://www.mafhoum.com/press6/174E11.pdf

Pandey, C., & Budhthoki, R. K. (2020). Impact of liquidity on the profitability of the
commercial banks of Nepal. Pravaha, 26(1), 39-44.

https://doi.org/10.3126/pravaha.v26i1.41662

Pant, P. R. (2002). Social science research and thesis writing. Kathmandu: Buddha
Academic Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd.

Pawlowska, M. (2016). Market structure, business cycle and bank profitability:


evidence on Polish Banks. Bank i Kredyt, 47(4), 341-364.
Pokharel, R. (2011). Comparative study on the profitability of Nepal SBI bank limited
and Nepal Bangladesh bank limited. An unpublished master's degree thesis
submitted to faculty of management, Tribhuvan University.

Salvatore, D., & Rastogi, S. K. (2016). Managerial economics. New Delhi: Oxford
University Preses.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research method in business: A skill building
approach. Singapore John Wiley and Sons.

Shrestha, P. M. (2020). Determinants of financial performance of Nepalese


commercial banks: Evidence from panel data approach. NRB Economic
Review, 32(2), 45-59.

Shrestha, B. (2018). Liquidity management and profitability of commercial banks in


Nepal. Proceedings of ARSSS International Conference, 27th May, 2018,
New Delhi, India.

Siddhartha Bank Limited. (2017). Annual report for F.Y. 2016/17.

https://www.siddharthabank.com/assets/backend/uploads/Fincial_Highlights/
Annual_reports/Annual%20Report%20for%20website_nepali.pdf

Siddhartha Bank Limited. (2018). Annual report for F.Y. 2017/18.

https://www.siddharthabank.com/assets/backend/uploads/Fincial_Highlights/
Annual_reports/AnnualReport207475.pdf

Siddhartha Bank Limited. (2019). Annual report for F.Y. 2018/19.

https://www.siddharthabank.com/assets/backend/uploads/Fincial_Highlights/
Annual_reports/Annual%20Report%202075-76%20(2018-19)-
In%20Nepali_20191017121825.pdf

Siddhartha Bank Limited. (2020). Annual report for F.Y. 2019/20.

https://www.siddharthabank.com/assets/backend/uploads/Fincial_Highlights/
Annual%20Report%202076-77%20(2019-20)-
In%20Nepali_20210119105834.pdf

Siddhartha Bank Limited. (2021). Annual report for F.Y. 2020/21.


https://www.siddharthabank.com/assets/backend/uploads/SBL_AR%2020-
21.pdf

Van Horne, J. C. (2000). Financial management and policy. New Delhi: Prentice
World.

Wagle, K. N. & Dahal, R. K. (2004). Management accounting. Kathmandu: Khanal


Books and Stationery.

Wolf, H. & Pant, P. R. (2002). A handbook for social science research and thesis
writing. Kathmandu: Buddha Academic Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd.
APPENDICES

Annexure-1

Selected Data of Sample Banks

Name of CAR ROE ROA


S.n. Bank FY BC (NPR) BD (NPR) BL (NPR) BS (NPR) (%) (%) (%)
1 ADBL 2073/74 11,555.68 99,816.27 88,206.55 126,866.60 20.41 11.77 2.15
2 ADBL 2074/75 13,937.93 104,216.46 100,030.11 135,419.61 19.66 13.00 2.54
3 ADBL 2075/76 14,448.24 118,884.92 108,806.70 151,457.73 20.37 14.78 2.77
4 ADBL 2076/77 14,989.17 143,628.52 121,849.39 179,320.22 19.33 11.70 1.86
5 ADBL 2077/78 16,422.64 162,814.93 150,598.36 222,440.35 16.95 11.20 1.59
6 GIBL 2073/74 8,080.34 101,910.48 77,461.63 116,592.27 11.37 19.33 1.75
7 GIBL 2074/75 8,888.38 104,850.51 88,878.10 125,847.43 11.47 16.19 1.67
8 GIBL 2075/76 10,310.52 120,088.44 108,977.61 151,653.56 12.31 18.47 1.82
9 GIBL 2076/77 18,975.88 212,315.39 190,336.85 273,876.59 12.48 12.88 1.06
10 GIBL 2077/78 21,632.50 268,433.79 228,651.43 345,423.26 13.20 13.53 1.21
11 HBL 2073/74 6,491.62 92,881.11 74,159.52 108,063.25 12.15 21.22 2.03
12 HBL 2074/75 8,114.53 98,988.79 82,474.99 116,462.30 12.46 14.17 1.67
13 HBL 2075/76 8,520.26 109,387.06 92,697.32 133,151.14 12.60 18.34 2.21
14 HBL 2076/77 9,372.28 125,264.38 101,728.47 155,884.92 14.89 15.40 1.79
15 HBL 2077/78 10,684.40 141,021.07 126,048.13 178,490.93 13.89 14.89 1.68
16 NABIL 2073/74 8,041.16 118,896.16 89,756.71 140,332.06 11.73 25.61 2.70
17 NABIL 2074/75 8,043.22 134,810.67 109,059.36 160,978.07 13.00 20.94 2.61
18 NABIL 2075/76 9,011.85 162,954.00 127,500.24 201,138.82 12.50 17.76 2.11
19 NABIL 2076/77 10,097.50 190,806.47 148,054.07 237,680.03 13.07 13.61 1.58
20 NABIL 2077/78 13,844.45 223,474.47 198,021.42 291,066.22 12.77 15.19 1.71
21 SBL 2073/74 7,584.54 77,317.56 65,511.59 89,901.51 12.74 14.89 1.51
22 SBL 2074/75 8,464.39 94,579.59 83,236.09 119,869.22 12.12 15.34 1.47
23 SBL 2075/76 8,887.60 114,923.37 104,876.30 154,031.13 12.70 15.71 1.49
24 SBL 2076/77 9,787.77 139,609.50 123,572.73 182,468.45 13.17 13.81 1.26
25 SBL 2077/78 10,962.30 180,924.01 158,579.24 228,941.96 13.36 15.68 1.25

Source: Respected Annual Report of Banks

*All amount figure are in million

You might also like