Ilptlp

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program

Individualized Learning Plan (ILP) – Teacher Leader Project


Option
Revised 1.1.19
Directions: The ILP should be completed with Mentor input. Complete blue cells prior to classroom implementation. Complete orange cells after POP Cycle is completed. Cells will expand as
needed. When submitting completed ILP to instructor, please include copies of all instructional resources, including Google Survey used for assessment of audience satisfaction.
Section 1: New Teacher Information
New Teacher Email Subject Area Grade Level
YE SEUL (ESTHER) YI YSYI53@GMAIL.COM MATH 7
Mentor Email School/District Date
TYSON BEHRNS TBEHRNS@COVSCHOOL.ORG COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 3/5/2023
Section 2: CSTP Areas of Inquiry
Directions: Identify 2-3 CSTP elements for ILP focus. Use most recent CSTP Assessment for Initial Rating. Identify both teacher and student rating for CSTP 1 and 2. See example.
CSTP Element Initial Rating Description Goal Rating Description
T - Guide students to think critically through use of questioning strategies, T - Facilitates systematic opportunities for students to apply critical
Promoting critical thinking posing/solving problems, and reflection on issues in content. thinking by designing structured inquires into complex problems.
T – Applying T – Innovating
1.5 through inquiry, problem S - Students respond to varied questions or tasks designed to promote S - Students pose and answer a wide-range of complex questions
S – Exploring S - Innovating
solving, and reflection comprehension and critical thinking in single lessons or a sequence of and problems, reflect, and communicate understandings based on
lessons. in depth analysis of content learning.

Sets and modifies authentic


Establishing goals connected to the CSTP
that are intellectually
professional
Sets goals connected to the CSTP challenging and based on self-
goals and
that are authentic, challenging, and assessment and feedback from
engaging in
based on self- assessment. a variety of sources.
continuous
6.2 T-Applying Integrating
and Selects and engages in professional Engages in and contributes to
purposeful development based on needs professional development
professional identified in professional goals. targeted on student
growth and achievement. Pursues a variety
development of additional opportunities to
learn professionally.
Reflecting
Reflects individually and with
on teaching Engages in reflection individually and
colleagues on refinements in
practice in with colleagues on the relationship
teaching practice and
6.1 support of Applying between making adjustments in Integrating
connections among the elements
student teaching practice and impact on the
of the CSTP to positively impact
learning full range of learners.
the full range of learners.
Section 3: Teacher Leader Inquiry Focus and Planning
Project Title Inquiry Question Project Objective(s)
Provide an overview of the
How can attending a curriculum curriculum so that teachers that
review workshop help inform are not piloting may be able to
REVIEW OF CURRICULUM PILOT
colleagues to make decisions about make a more informed decision
the curriculum pilot? about purchasing the
curriculum.
Audience for Project How Project Fits into Professional Goals and/or
How Audience Satisfaction will be Assessed
(Who Participates/Who Benefits) Department/School/District Needs
SCHOOL IS LOOKING TO BUY NEW
SCIENCE CURRICULUM SO I AM
CURRENTLY PILOTING THE TEACHERS WILL BE ABLE TO
CURRICULUM IN GRADE 7. BY FOLLOW SOME OF THE
ALL STAFF WILL PARTICIPATE, SCHOOL WILL PROVIDING A REVIEW OF THE CURRUCULUM AS PROVIDED BY
BENEFIT CURRICULUM, OTHER TEACHERS WILL THE PUBLISHER AND TEACHERS
BE ABLE TO HEAR HOW THE PILOT WAS WILL FILL OUT A QUESTIONNAIRE
IN MY CLASSROOM AND WHETHER WE TO REVIEW MY PRESENTATION
SHOULD PURCHASE OR TRY ANOTHER
PILOT.
Special Emphasis: Teacher Leader Model Standards and NBPTS Core Propositions
Directions: Identify at least one NBPTS and at least one Teacher Leader Model Standards that are the primary focus of your project. Explain how these standards will be incorporated.
Special Emphasis Focus How Special Emphasis will be Incorporated
I will be delivering a review of the curriculum I am piloting in the classroom to my
NBPTS Proposition 5: Teachers are Members of
colleagues so that we can collectively make a decision about the curriculum
Professional Communities
purchase.
Teacher Leader Model Domain 4: Facilitates
I am serving as a teacher leader by piloting a curriculum and then providing a
Improvements in Instruction and Student
review of the curriculum so that we can all improve instruction and student
Learning
learning by the use of a newer and more up-to-date curriculum
Inquiry Implementation Plan
Discuss Results with
Analyze Results
Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Milestone 3 Mentor
Milestone 4
Milestone 5
Develop
Analyze teacher
Discuss with the presentation,
Schedule a date for feedback in
Identify name and date for other teachers who notes, handouts, Discuss results
activities. presentation with regards to
are piloting about resources and with mentor
school office curriculum and
what info to present deliver
presentation
presentation
By 3/10/2023 By 3/17/2023 3/24/2023 3/31/2023 4/7/2023
Provide 1-2 sentence
I will provide a review of the curriculum I am piloting to the rest of the school staff so that they may be
summary of your teacher
leader project. informed as to what the curriculum is like.
Summarize process for
analyzing effectiveness of I will provide an evaluation for the teachers to fill out.
leadership role.
Section 4: Inquiry Research and Exploration
Research/Professional Learning (Identify two articles that have informed inquiry focus. Provide title, URL or citation, and statement of what was learned.)
https://www.edelements.com/instructional-curriculum-strategies
It gives a framework as to how to select curriculum and what to consider while school
Curriculum Adoption & Strategy pilot curriculum. I learned that there is a systematic way to review a curriculum, which
we really haven’t been doing as the school has been reviewing different curriculum that
has been sent by publishers
Tea
What Does It Take to Implement a Strong Curriculum There are different variables that determine whether a curriculum is “good” or “bad” in
Effectively? a school, which do not necessarily have to do with the curriculum, but how it is
implemented.
Colleagues (Summarize how two colleagues have addressed similar leadership roles OR the status of the issue at department/school/district level.)

These two colleagues are also piloting the curriculum and they will also be providing
Barton and Slusuarenko
reviews of how the pilot is going in their classrooms.

Section 5: Results and Reflection


Initial Revised
CSTP Element Evidence/Rational for Rating Suggestions for Moving Forward
Rating Rating
To move to INNOVATING level: Consider how to
Promoting critical
Teacher asked questions of analysis and evaluation. increase complexity of task beyond a single lesson so
thinking through T – Applying T – Integrating
1.5 Students answered questions that included all levels of Bloom’s. Students created their that there are continuing opportunities for students to
inquiry, problem S – Exploring S - Integrating
own math problems. engage in inquiry in complex problem. How could you
solving, and reflection
extend lesson into PBL?

Using and Teacher- In order to make the curriculum pilot


adapting discussion relevant to all the staff present at the
resources, meeting, I incorporated not only science skills
tech, and but critical thinking skills as a topic of discussion
Consider using the Curriculum
standards- since critical thinking is needed in all subjects.
Handout Workbook by the Bill
aligned
3.5 Integrating Innovating and Melinda Gates
instructional Learners- The teachers were very much
Foundation from the
materials to engaged with the discussion. They were asking
beginning of the pilot.
make subject questions, looking through the student books
matter that were available to them to review, and
accessible to debating on how the findings inform them on
all students. the decision of purchasing this curriculum.
Collaborating
with
colleagues
and the Teacher- I worked with two other teachers who
Consider how to make this
broader piloted the curriculum to be able to provide a
pilot review more accessible
professional more full and comprehensive review of the
6.3 Integrating Innovating to other teachers who may
community curriculum to the rest of the staff. I created the
not have the opportunity to
to support surveys and slides so that the other teachers
review Twig.
teacher and can provide input and discussion.
student
learning

Establishing
professional Teacher- After having gone to my first
goals and convention, I am seeing how I can be a teacher
engaging in leader even outside of my own school. I want to
continuous be a presenter at a conference, which would Consider how I can be more
6.2 and Integrating Innovating require me to have something that is worthy of engaging, different, and
purposeful presenting, which requires me to be more effective in the classroom.
professional effective in the classroom and innovative so
growth and that I have something to share with colleagues
development in the broader community.

Special Emphasis (Teacher Leader Model Standards or NBPTS Core Propositions


Key Learnings and New Skills/Knowledge Developed Contribution to
Product(s) Generated
by Teacher Others/Department/School/District
Teacher Leader Domain IV: Serves as a team Created student survey to evaluate pilot School will benefit from the surveys I
leader to harness the skills, expertise, and curriculum. have created so that they may be
knowledge of colleagues to address curricular A beta version of a pilot curriculum able to make informed decisions
expectations and student learning needs. survey for teachers when choosing curriculum
Mentor Feedback
Directions: The Mentor should Identify strengths and areas of improvement in each of the following areas.
The digital presentation was created and presented in a logical and cohesvie
Effectiveness of resources designed by Candidate, including manner. The teachers she presented to were a mixture of two teachers who also
presentation, notes, handouts, and other resources. piloted the program and seven teachers who did not pilot the program. She did a
good job of including input from the other pilot teachers into the presentation.
Effectiveness of Candidate in teaching and coaching adults. Information was clear and concise and showed respect for the other teachers
(Refer to Adult Learning Principles in FOTIP Handbook time. She allowed their questions to inform which areas she went into greater
[https://www.fotip.org/adult-learning-theory.html]. depth beyond the main points she was covering.

This topic is a high value for our campus as we look at new curriculum for the
Value of topic for audience.
entire campus. This presentation time well spent for the entire staff.

She did very well running this PD. She kept the group focused and engaged. She
Overall delivery by Candidate of the professional development
covered the topic completely but did not fill the time with fluff. The interaction
experience, including audience engagement, pacing, tone, and
response to questions. during questions and discussion showed that she was fully prepared for this
presentation.
Analysis and Summary of Audience Assessment
Directions: Record assessment data into Assessment Data Table (see end of document). Include copies of assessment tool with submission. Include at least one graph in your summary.

I gave a presentation of the piloted curriculum reviewing it’s pros and cons so that the staff may be able to make an informed decision
about whether we would like to purchase this curriculum for the school. After the presentation, staff members were given an
evaluation of my presentation. All said that they agreed or strongly agreed that I was effective in presenting my findings as shown in
the graph below.
Most, if not all, staff members stated that their knowledge of the piloted curriculum was increased as shown by the graph below.

In the short answer question of “What aspects of this presentation were most useful or valuable?” staff members stated that student
work samples (I brought student books into the presentation), the survey, and specific examples were useful or valuable.

Overall, I feel that my presentation was a success and that going forward, I can improve my presentation by utilizing the free tools
available (ie. Curriculum Support Workbook by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) more heavily from the beginning of the pilot.

Action Items (some may not be applicable)


For curriculum design, lesson
planning, assessment
planning
This pilot highlighted some areas of growth, one of which is better classroom management to be able to
For classroom practice
achieve all that I want to achieve
For teaching English
learners, students with
This curriculum have embedded translating services on the digital version, which is helpful to the English
special needs, and students
with other instructional learners. It also had differentiated curriculum for students with special needs and instructional challenges.
challenges
For future professional Create a more accessible and comprehensive curriculum review that is accessible to all teachers who may
development not be going through a formal pilot.
For supporting
others/department/
school/district

Other

Other Notes and Comments

Below in order:
Presentation Slides
Presenter Evaluation Form
Results of Presenter Evaluation Form

Include copy of Google Survey Form assessment tool.


TWIG CURRICULUM Domain IV: Serves as a team leader to harness the skills, expertise, and knowledge of
colleagues to address curricular expectations and student learning needs.
PILOT REVIEW

Presented to Staff at CCS


By Ye Esther Yi
April 19, 2023

Up and Coming NEW science curriculum!

2nd- Habitats and


Piloted by 2nd,
5th, and 7th
BIodiversity 5th-

Yellowstone:

Uncovered 7th-

Dinosaur Trails

Student Work Samples

Many positive responses - general consensus of “fun”

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1SgMkZDXk9jz7l8E_nlFq1I3ZwXzd6wRDhXfc

Mixed negative responses - slow, too much writing, confusing if absent one day, book
was boring, too long, etc
Student Work Samples
Materials up-to-date and attractive? ✔✔✔ Add comments here:

Lesson/activities easy for youth to Known for their videos by other teachers
understand? ✔✔✔

Did it provide a way for youth to learn by doing?


✔-, ✔-,✔-

Fun way to learn? ✔-, ✔-,✔-

Will youth be able to use what they learned?


✔✔✔

Enough depth?
2nd Grade - Habitats & Biodiversity

-Students need more discussion skills


Poor Fair Good Very good Excellent

Easy to lead and teach? ✔✔ ✔ -Twig requires good classroom management skills

Online dashboard ✔✔✔ -Its depth only goes as far as the teacher is willing to take it and will need
Quality of lab and lab materials ✔✔✔ additional resources. Uses too much time and energy to drive one single point.
Interactive lab/activities ✔✔✔
-student centered instruction (more work from the student)
Enough resources? ✔✔ ✔

Differentiated resources? ✔✔ ✔

No mention of Twig https://curriculumsupport.org/

from EdReports
Curriculum Piloting https://curriculumsupport.org/wp-c
- Educator Led Review Teams Programs ontent/uploads/2019/02/Instructio
Independent https://www.edreports.org/reports/
nPartners-Workbook.pdf

Ratings science (extra resources)


Common Sense Education says of the
video subscription, cool videos, not
enough depth
https://www.commonsense.org/ed
ucation/reviews/twig
Any questions about TWIG or how it’s
Open Discussion been implemented in the pilot?

Any other questions?


TWIG Presenter evaluation
Please submit feedback regarding the course you have just completed,
including feedback on course content, and instructor.

Level of effort

Fair Satisfactory Very good Excellent

Level of
perceived
effort the
presenter
put into the
Your TWIG knowledge

Fair Satisfactory Very good Excellent

Level of TWIG
knowledge at
start of
presentation

Level of TWIG
knowledge at
end of
presentation

Skill and responsiveness of the instructor

Strongly Strongly
Neutral Agree
disagree agree

Presenter was an
effective
lecturer/demonstrator

Presentations were
clear and organized

Presenter stimulated
student interest

Presenter was
available and helpful
Presentation

Strongly Strongly
Neutral Agree
disagree agree

Content of
presentation
was helpful
and achieved
what it sought
achieve

Presentation
was organized
and
planned

What aspects of this presentation were most useful or valuable?

Your answer

How would you improve this presentation?

Your answer
Submit Clear form

Never submit passwords through Google Forms.

This form was created inside ______. Report Abuse


o mention of Twig

Twig Presenter evaluation

Publish analytics

Level of effort

10.0
Poor Fair Satisfactory Very good Excellent

7.5

5.0

2.5

0.0
Level of perceived effort the presenter put into the course
Your TWIG knowledge Copy

Poor Fair Satisfactory Very good Excellent

0
Level of TWIG knowledge at start of presentation Level of TWIG knowledge at end of pres

Skill and responsiveness of the instructor Copy

Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agre


8

0
Presenter was an effective Presentations were clear Presenter stimulated Prese
lecturer/demonstrator and organized student interest
5/7/23, 9:36 AM Course evaluation

Presentation Copy

Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agre


8

0
Content of presentation was helpful and achieved Presentation was organized and well pl
what it sought to achieve

What aspects of this presentation were most useful or valuable?


7 responses

The students’ short answers.

Specific examples of pros and cons of the curriculum

I really liked how she surveyed her students how they appreciated the use of
Twig. I like how she gave honest feedback about how useful it was for her kids
and her strategies to let them critical think for themselves.

Esther brought a level of expertise to her presentation and was well versed on her
area of study. She also brought helpful feedback/interest of students. Well done!

ALl.

Insight into different grade level books and understandings.

Since this is curriculum that we may all use at our school next year, all of her
information regarding what will or will not be beneficial for us, was very helpful.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1laAJK-Nqfoe8VB1mVmA8jZbl2r8HmZfnt5Uwf9OV85E/viewanalytics 3/
17
5/7/23, 9:36 AM Course evaluation

How would you improve this presentation?

She did a great job! No changes.

Overall she did a wonderful job!!!

None.

I wouldn’t.

This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

Forms

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1laAJK-Nqfoe8VB1mVmA8jZbl2r8HmZfnt5Uwf9OV85E/viewanalytics 4/
17
5/7/23, 9:36 AM Course evaluation

Individualized Learning Plan, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017 Page 5 of 17

You might also like