Forkuo Et Al
Forkuo Et Al
Forkuo Et Al
net/publication/322098745
CITATIONS READS
22 337
8 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Natural Products and Nutritional Phytochemicals Inhibiting Neuroinflammation, Neurodegeration, Neuroinflammatory Signalling Pathways, and Neurotransmission
View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Arnold Forkuo Donkor on 28 December 2017.
Abstract
Background: Discovery of novel gametocytocidal molecules is a major pharmacological strategy in the elimination
and eradication of malaria. The high patronage of the aqueous root extract of the popular West African anti-malarial
plant Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Periplocaceae) in traditional and hospital settings in Ghana has directed this study
investigating the gametocytocidal activity of the plant and its major alkaloid, cryptolepine. This study also investigates
the anti-malarial interaction of cryptolepine with standard anti-malarials, as the search for new anti-malarial combina-
tions continues.
Methods: The resazurin-based assay was employed in evaluating the gametocytocidal properties of C. sanguinolenta
and cryptolepine against the late stage (IV/V) gametocytes of Plasmodium falciparum (NF54). A fixed ratio method
based on the SYBR Green I fluorescence-based assay was used to build isobolograms from a combination of cryptole-
pine with four standard anti-malarial drugs in vitro using the chloroquine sensitive strain 3D7.
Results: Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (IC50 = 49.65 nM) and its major alkaloid, cryptolepine (IC50 = 1965 nM), showed
high inhibitory activity against the late stage gametocytes of P. falciparum (NF54). In the interaction assays in asex-
ual stage, cryptolepine showed an additive effect with both lumefantrine and chloroquine with mean ΣFIC50s of
1.017 ± 0.06 and 1.465 ± 0.17, respectively. Cryptolepine combination with amodiaquine at therapeutically relevant
concentration ratios showed a synergistic effect (mean ΣFIC50 = 0.287 ± 0.10) whereas an antagonistic activity (mean
ΣFIC50 = 4.182 ± 0.99) was seen with mefloquine.
Conclusions: The findings of this study shed light on the high gametocytocidal properties of C. sanguinolenta and
cryptolepine attributing their potent anti-malarial activity mainly to their effect on both the sexual and asexual stages
of the parasite. Amodiaquine is a potential drug partner for cryptolepine in the development of novel fixed dose
combinations.
Keywords: Gametocytocidal, Malaria, Anti-malarial drug combinations, Cryptolepis sanguinolenta, Cryptolepine
© The Author(s) 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/
publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Forkuo et al. Malar J (2017) 16:496 Page 2 of 9
agents (the artemisinins) in the Thai–Cambodia border in distilled water prior to use in the gametocytocidal
puts the progress achieved under serious threat [4, 5]. assay.
This scenario requires the urgent need to accelerate the
discovery and development of novel anti-malarial leads Drugs/chemicals
and combinations that have activity against both the sex- Lumefantrine, chloroquine, mefloquine and amodi-
ual and asexual stages of the parasite. aquine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
For this reason, the popular West African anti-malar- MO, USA). Gentamicin was obtained from Invitrogen
ial plant Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Periplocaceae) and Life Technologies Inc. (Carlsbad, CA, USA). RPMI-
it major alkaloid, cryptolepine were assessed against the 1640 medium, streptomycin/penicillin, l-glutamine and
transmissible stages of the human malaria parasite. The HEPES were obtained from Gibco BRL Life Technologies
aqueous root extract of C. sanguinolenta has been used (Grand Island, NY, USA). Cryptolepine hydrochloride
for decades in West Africa for the treatment of malaria (purity 98.9%) was isolated from the root of C. sanguino-
[6] and currently, several herbal preparations registered lenta as described by Kuntworbe et al. [10].
for use in Ghanaian orthodox clinics contain the aque-
ous root extract of the plant. The wide usage of the plant In vitro cultivation of asexual stage Plasmodium falciparum
may be attributed to the safety and high cure rate of a tea The in vitro cultivation method of P. falciparum drug-
bag formulation (Phyto-laria) of the plant against chloro- sensitive strain NF54 was adapted from Reader et al. [11].
quine resistant strains of P. falciparum in human clinical Parasite cultures were maintained in human erythrocytes
trials [7], supporting their usage as alternative tools to the (5% haematocrit, A rhesus positive) suspended in com-
standard anti-malarial interventions or as complemen- plete parasite medium (CPM) (RPMI 1640 medium sup-
tary treatments in the absence of standard anti-malarial plemented with 25 mM HEPES, 0.2% d-glucose, 24 μg/
drugs. Cryptolepine, the major indoloquinoline alkaloid mL gentamicin, 0.2% sodium bicarbonate (pH = 7.3),
isolated from the plant has the most potent antiplasmo- 200 μM hypoxanthine with 10% human serum (A rhesus
dial activity [8] and has been shown to exhibit potent positive) and flushed with 90% N2, 5% O
2, and 5% C
O2 in
in vitro activities against both chloroquine-sensitive and humidified modular chambers at 37 °C. Parasite medium
chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum [9]. was changed daily and fresh CPM introduced. Parasitae-
With lessons learnt from the widely used artemisinin mia of Giemsa-stained slides were monitored daily with
derivatives, thus their isolation from the medicinal plant light microscopy.
Artemisia annua, directed the exploration of the popu-
larly used anti-malarial plant, C. sanguinolenta and its Induction of gametocytogenesis and maintenance
major alkaloid, cryptolepine for possible gametocytocidal of gametocyte cultures
effects on P. falciparum. The in vitro anti-malarial inter- Combined conditions of low haematocrit and nutri-
action of cryptolepine with chloroquine, lumefantrine, ent starvation were employed in the induction of game-
amodiaquine and mefloquine (Fig. 1) were also ascer- tocytogenesis. To trigger gametocytogenesis, asexual
tained in this study. cultures of 6–10% parasitaemia were diluted to 0.5%
parasitaemia at 6% haematocrit and then introduced into
Methods a glucose-free medium. The medium was kept at 37 °C
Plant material gassed with 90% N2, 5% O2, and 5% CO2 without shaking.
The sun-dried cut roots of C. sanguinolenta used in this The medium was changed daily. After 72 h, the haema-
study were collected at the Centre for Scientific Research tocrit was dropped to 3% (day 0). Gametocytogenesis
into Plant Medicine (CSRPM), Mampong-Akwapim, was monitored daily before medium (glucose-free) was
Ghana in August 2012 and were identified by the Plant changed. To eliminate residual asexual parasites, cultures
Development Centre of the Institution. Its authenticity were treated on days 6–9 by continuous treatment with
was confirmed by Dr. Kofi Annan of the Department of 50 mM N-acetyl glucosamine (NAG). The medium was
Pharmacognosy, KNUST and subsequently compared then fortified with 0.2% glucose from day 10 onwards.
to a voucher specimen KNUST/HM1/2008/L056 at the The gametocyte levels were monitored daily by micros-
herbarium of the Department of Pharmacognosy/Herbal copy until they were predominantly (> 90%) stage V and
Medicine, College of Health Sciences. these gametocytes were employed in the resazurin-based
The powdered roots (650 g) were boiled for 30 min assay.
with 5 L of distilled water, decanted and filtered. The
filtrate was freeze dried to obtain a freeze-dried sam- Gametocyte viability assays
ple of the crude extract (yield = 11.08% w/w) referred The in vitro gametocytocidal activities of cryptolepine
to as cryptolepis (CPS). Cryptolepis was reconstituted and the aqueous root extract of C. sanguinolenta were
Forkuo et al. Malar J (2017) 16:496 Page 3 of 9
a
b OH CH3
HO
N
H N CH3
HN
F
N
F
F Cl N
F F
F
d Cl
c Cl
CH3
CH3
N CH3
Cl
HN
H
HO N
Cl N
CH3
CH3
e
CH3
N
H
HCl
Fig. 1 Structure of anti-malarial agents used in the interaction assay. a Mefloquine, b amodiaquine, c chloroquine, d lumefantrine, e crytolepine
hydrochloride
for 20 s. The plate was left to incubate for 2 h and then desired final concentrations for the assay. The final haem-
centrifuged at 120×g for 1 min. The supernatant (70 µL) atocrit and parasitaemia of the culture media were 2 and
was transferred to a clean 96-well plate before being read 1%, respectively. The assay plates were gassed with a mix-
in a multiwell spectrophotometer (Infinite F500, Tecan, ture of gases containing 92% N2, 5% CO2 and 3% O2 for
USA) by fluorescence detection at 535/612 nm. Gameto- 6 min and carefully arranged in a modular incubator (Bil-
cyte survival in each test culture after treatment was cal- lups-Rothenberg Inc, USA). The plates were incubated
culated relative to the control wells. The experiment was at 37 °C for 48 h. Post incubation, the plates were stored
performed in triplicate on two separate occasions. at − 30 °C wrapped in aluminium foil. The plates were
thawed and subsequently mixed with 100 μL of Malaria
Antiplasmodial interaction assay SYBR Green 1 fluorescent (MSF) lysis buffer containing
In vitro malaria parasite cultivation SYBR Green. The plates were incubated at room tem-
Plasmodium falciparum laboratory strain 3D7 was cul- perature in the dark for an hour and fluorescence data
tured according to method described by Trager and (relative fluorescence unit, RFU) were acquired using a
Jensen [13] with slight modifications as described. Human fluorescence multi-well plate reader (Tecan Infinite M200
erythrocytes (O rhesus positive) fortified in complete Pro) with emission and excitation wavelength at 535 and
culture medium (pH 7.3) served as host cells for parasite 485 nm, respectively. The experiment was performed in
maturation. The complete culture medium consisted of triplicate.
filter-sterilized RPMI 1640 solution supplemented with
0.5% AlbuMAX II, 0.72% HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethyl- Statistical analysis
piperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid) and hypoxanthine The performance of the gametocyte assay was assessed
buffered with 0.4% sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3). Gen- by estimating the Z factor statistical parameter described
tamicin (0.005 mg/mL) was added to the final solution. by Zhang et al. [15]. Gametocyte viability was calculated
A controlled experimental environment with a gas using the relation below
supply of 92% N2, 5% CO2 and 3% O2 at 37 °C was used
% Parasite viability
to grow the parasites in culture flasks. Parasite growth,
Fluorescencecompound − Mean fluorescencebackground
viability and stages were monitored daily by light micros- = × 100
Mean fluorescencepositive − Mean fluorescencebackground
copy of Giemsa-stained cultures after changing the cul-
ture media. Parasitaemia levels were kept between 2 and The IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) served as a
8%, with a 5% haematocrit. measure of anti-malarial activity and was determined
by plotting and analysing dose–response curves using
In vitro antiplasmodial interaction assay GraphPad Prism (GraphPad 6 Software, San Diego,
The SYBR Green I-based fluorescence assay was USA). The assessment of drug interaction was based on
employed to investigate the in vitro anti-malarial inter- calculating the sum of the fractional inhibitory concen-
action between cryptolepine and the four standard tration (ΣFIC50s) at the given effective concentration by
anti-malarial agents against P. falciparum (chloroquine the formula below
sensitive, 3D7). Cryptolepine (Drug A, CPE), lumefan-
trine (LUM), mefloquine (MFQ), chloroquine (CQ) and
IC50 of cryptolepine in combination
amodiaquine (AMQ) stock solutions were prepared in FIC50 =
IC50 of cryptolepine alone
ethanol at 1 mM. Concentrations ranging from 32.5 to
2080 nM for CPE, 2 to 640 nM for LUM, 3.2 to 83 nM IC50 of Drug B in combination
+
for CQ, 5 to 800 nM for MFQ and 1 to 128 nM for AMQ IC50 of Drug B alone
were used for the interaction assays. A fixed ratio interac-
tion assay as described previously by Fivelman et al. [14] The nature of interaction was explained using ΣFIC50s.
was employed in this assay. Values < 0.8 denote synergism, 0.8–1.4 denotes addi-
For each assay, fixed drug ratios (4:1, 3:2, 2:3 and 1:4) tive interaction, and ≥ 1.4 denotes antagonism [16]. The
were prepared in a 10 µL volume for cryptolepine (Drug overall nature of the anti-malarial interaction was based
A) and any of the standard agents (Drug B). A twofold on the mean ΣFIC50s.
serial dilution followed each fixed ratio in a well ensur- A Microsoft Excel datasheet was used to calculate
ing the IC50 of each drug alone (5:0 and 0:5) fell approxi- percentage inhibition in relation to the control results.
mately at the mid-point of the serial dilution. Parasite Figures were made using GraphPad Prism for Windows
culture (90 µL) was added to each well to obtain seven version 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Forkuo et al. Malar J (2017) 16:496 Page 5 of 9
a
100
CPS
80
% Gametocyte viability
60
40
20
0
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Log conc ( M)
b 100
CPE
80
% Gametocyte viability
60
40
20
0
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Log conc ( M)
c 100
DHA
80
% Gametocyte viability
60
40
20
0
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Log conc ( M)
Fig. 2 Gametocyte viability of CPS and CPE. Gametocytocidal activity of CPS (a), CPE (b) and DHA (c) against late stage gametocytes. Bars represent
mean gametocyte activity at each compound concentration (with standard deviation [SD])
Forkuo et al. Malar J (2017) 16:496 Page 7 of 9
Table
1 In vitro anti-malarial activity against asexual membrane damage and parasite death [9, 26, 27]. On
blood stages this background it is not surprising that antagonism was
Drugs Mean IC50 ± S.E.M (nM) observed when cryptolepine was combined with meflo-
quine, possibly following a similar pathway of antago-
Amodiaquine 12.63 ± 1.66 nism demonstrated by mefloquine when combined with
Mefloquine 12.98 ± 0.47 chloroquine. In the case of cryptolepine-lumefantrine
Lumefantrine 10.80 ± 0.97 combination at therapeutically relevant concentration
Chloroquine 11.05 ± 1.79 ratios, an additivity effect (mean ΣFIC = 1.017 ± 0.45)
Cryptolepine 603.82 ± 75.57 was observed.
IC50 values of cryptolepine, lumefantrine, mefloquine, and chloroquine against The combination of cryptolepine with amodiaquine
Plasmodium falciparum strain 3D7 are expressed as mean ± standard error of showed synergy in vitro in P. falciparum strain 3D7 and
mean of the results of at least three independent assays
this combination provides a dual action with both agents
inhibiting haemoglobin digestion in the asexual blood
Cryptolepine showed varied interaction with the 4-ami- stages and amodiaquine inhibiting gametocyte matu-
noquinolines, amodiaquine and chloroquine. The ration/gamete exflagellation by different mechanisms
combination of cryptolepine with amodiaquine had a [28]. Such combinations with dual action are relevant in
synergistic effect in vitro (mean ΣFIC = 0.235 ± 0.15) malaria endemic regions, where infections are usually
whereas an additive effect (mean ΣFIC = 1.342 ± 0.34) asymptomatic with clinical symptoms developing late
was seen with chloroquine. The 4-aminoquinolines in the course of the disease, permitting the maturation
are considered to share, in principle, the same mode of of gametocytes and hence disease transmission [29, 30].
action. However, a different interactive profile was found The enhanced anti-malarial activity of cryptolepine with
with cryptolepine. It is therefore wrong to equate amo- amodiaquine may possibly result in low-dose treatment
diaquine to chloroquine in terms of activity. The synergy regimens and hence reduce toxicity. However, it should
observed with amodiaquine may be due to the Man- be noted that these assay results may vary in different
nich base structure in amodiaquine. A similar synergis- plasmodium strains and further investigations is recom-
tic effect attributed to the Mannich base side chain in mended in the early stages of gametocytes and in several
pyronaridine and amodiaquine has been reported with P. falciparum strains and/or rodent malaria models to
artemisinin [24]. An antagonistic effect was observed accentuate the interactions established.
when cryptolepine was combined with mefloquine.
Mefloquine has been shown to inhibit the uptake of chlo- Conclusions
roquine as well as chloroquine’s ability to cause the accu- Cryptolepis sanguinolenta and its major alkaloid, cryp-
mulation of undigested haemoglobin [25]. tolepine exhibited high activities against the late-stage
Mefloquine (and possibly quinine) has also been gametocyte of P. falciparum NF54, attributing their pri-
hypothesized to inhibit endocytosis of the erythrocyte mary targets as the mature gametocytes and intraeryth-
cytosol by the parasite, resulting in a lowered free haem rocytic parasite. Lumefantrine and chloroquine both
concentration, to which chloroquine binds, in the diges- showed additivity when each drug was combined with
tive vacuole [25]. Cryptolepine, an indoloquinoline has cryptolepine whereas antagonism was observed when
been shown to act similarly to chloroquine by inhibit- cryptolepine was combined with mefloquine at thera-
ing the biomineralization of the toxic waste material peutically relevant concentration ratios. Cryptolepine
haem into an insoluble complex, haemozoin, leading to in combination with the Mannich base, amodiaquine,
Fig. 3 Effects of combinations of cryptolepine with standard anti-malarial drugs on Plasmodium falciparum growth in vitro (3D7 strain). Isobolo-
grams illustrating the effect of combinations of cryptolepine with amodiaquine (a), mefloquine (b), and chloroquine (c). The interaction between
cryptolepine and amodiaquine, mefloquine, chloroquine or lumefantrine against ring stage parasites was determined using the SYBR Green I
fluorescence-based drug sensitivity assay with the fixed ratio method. Each combination was set up in triplicate for 48 h. The F IC50 concentrations
were used for plotting the isobologram
showed synergism. On this basis, the cryptolepine– lumefantrine; AMQ: amodiaquine; CQ: chloroquine; nM: nano-molar; mM:
milli-molar; CPM: complete parasite medium; RBC: red blood cell; MSF: malaria
amodiaquine combination certainly deserves atten- SYBR Green I fluorescence.
tion for further studies in regards to the synergy
demonstrated. Authors’ contributions
ADF, DM, AT participated in the study design, carried out the experiments, per-
formed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript; CA, KBM, and BG
participated in the study design and the execution of the experiments; ADF
Abbreviations
conducted the in vitro anti-malarial interaction assays. CW isolated cryptole-
FIC: fractional inhibitory concentrations; Mean ΣFICs: mean sums of fractional
pine hydrochloride from the plant, Cryptolepis sanguinolenta; KA, CA, CW, KBM
inhibitory concentrations; IC50: 50% inhibitory concentration; WHO: World
and BG contributed to the study design and revision of the manuscript. All
Health Organization; ACT: artemisinin-based combination therapy; CPE:
authors read and approved the final manuscript.
cryptolepine; CPS: aqueous root extract of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta; LUM:
Forkuo et al. Malar J (2017) 16:496 Page 9 of 9
Author details 11. Reader J, Botha M, Theron A, Lauterbach SB, Rossouw C, Engelbrecht D,
1
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical et al. Nowhere to hide: interrogating different metabolic parameters of
Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes in a transmission blocking drug
and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. 2 Department of Immunology, Noguchi discovery pipeline towards malaria elimination. Malar J. 2015;14:213.
Memorial Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, 12. Tanaka TQ, Dehdashti SJ, Nguyen DT, McKew JC, Zheng W, Williamson KC.
Ghana. 3 Biosciences, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, P.O. A quantitative high throughput assay for identifying gametocytocidal
Box 395, Pretoria 0001, South Africa. 4 School of Pharmacy, University of Brad- compounds. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2013;188:20–5.
ford, West Yorkshire BD7 1DP, UK. 13. Trager W, Jensen JB. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Sci-
ence. 1976;193:673–5.
Competing interests 14. Fivelman QL, Adagu IS, Warhurst DC. Modified fixed-ratio isobologram
The authors declare that they have no competing interests with the trade- method for studying in vitro interactions between atovaquone and pro-
marks stated in this study. There is no financial gain or any other benefits from guanil or dihydroartemisinin against drug-resistant strains of Plasmodium
the cited trademarks. falciparum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:4097–102.
15. Zhang JH, Chung TD, Oldenburg KR. A simple statistical parameter for
Availability of data and materials use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the Biomol Screen. 1999;4:67–73.
article. 16. Snyder C, Chollet J, Wna Santo-Tomas J, Scheurer C, Wittlin S. In vitro
and in vivo interaction of synthetic peroxide RBx11160 (OZ277) with
Consent for publication piperaquine in Plasmodium models. Exp Parasitol. 2007;115:296–300.
Not applicable. 17. Boye GL. Studies on antimalarial action of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta
extract. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on east-west
Ethics approval and consent to participate medicine, Seoul, Korea. 1989 October 10–11; p. 243–51.
Not applicable. 18. Amoah LE, Kakaney C, Kwansa-Bentum B, Kusi KA. Activity of herbal
medicines on Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes: implications for
malaria transmission in Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0142587.
Publisher’s Note 19. Ansah C, Gooderham NJ. The popular herbal antimalarial, extract of Cryp-
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub- tolepis sanguinolenta, is potently cytotoxic. Toxicol Sci. 2002;70:245–51.
lished maps and institutional affiliations. 20. Kirby GC, Paine A, Warhurst DC, Noamese BK, Phillipson JD. In vitro and
in vivo antimalarial activity of cryptolepine, a plant-derived indoloquino-
Received: 8 May 2017 Accepted: 18 December 2017 line. Phytother Res. 1995;9:359–63.
21. Salako Q, Ablordeppey SY, Dwuma-Badu D, Thornback FR. Radioiodina-
tion and preliminary in vivo investigation of the alkaloid cryptolepine. Int
J Appl Radiat Isot. 1985;36:1003–4.
22. Stell JGP, Wheelhouse RT, Wright CW. Metabolism of cryptolepine
and 2-fluorocryptolepine by aldehyde oxidase. J Pharm Pharmacol.
References
2012;64:237–43.
1. WHO. World malaria report, 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization;
23. Kuntworbe N, Ofori M, Addo P, Tingle M, Al-Kassas R. Pharmacokinetics
2015.
and in vivo chemosuppressive activity studies on cryptolepine hydro-
2. Fidock DA. Drug discovery: priming the antimalarial pipeline. Nature.
chloride and cryptolepine-loaded gelatine nanoformulation designed
2010;465:297–8.
for parenteral administration for the treatment of malaria. Acta Trop.
3. Wells TNC, Alonso PL, Gutteridge WE. New medicines to improve control
2013;127:165–73.
and contribute to the eradication of malaria. Nat Rev Drug Discov.
24. Pradines B, Tall A, Parzy D, Spiegel A, Fusai T, Hienne R, et al. In vitro activ-
2009;8:879–91.
ity of pyronaridine and amodiaquine against African isolates (Senegal) of
4. Cheeseman IH, Miller BA, Nair S, Nkhoma S, Tan A, Tan JC, et al. A major
Plasmodium falciparum in comparison with standard antimalarial drugs—
genome region underlying artemisinin resistance in malaria. Science.
Mannich bases: promising drugs for Africa? J Antimicrob Chemother.
2012;336:79–82.
1998;42:333–9.
5. Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, et al. Arte-
25. Famin O, Ginsburg H. Differential effects of 4-aminoquinoline-containing
misinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med.
antimalarial drugs on haemoglobin digestion in Plasmodium falciparum-
2009;361:455–67.
infected erythrocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002;63:393–8.
6. Boye GL, Ampofo O. Clinical uses of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta. In: Pro-
26. Foley M, Tilley L. Quinoline antimalarials: mechanisms of action and resist-
ceedings of the first international seminar on cryptolepine, 27–30 July
ance and prospects for new agents. Pharmacol Ther. 1998;79:55–87.
1983, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, p. 37–40.
27. Kumar S, Guha M, Choubey V, Maity P, Bandyopadhyay U. Antimalarial
7. Bugyei KA, Boye GL, Addy ME. Clinical efficacy of a tea-bag formulation of
drugs inhibiting hemozoin (β-hematin) formation: a mechanistic update.
Cryptolepis sanguinolenta root in the treatment of acute uncomplicated
Life Sci. 2007;80:813–28.
falciparum malaria. Ghana Med J. 2010;44:3–9.
28. Delves M, Plouffe D, Scheurer C, Meister S, Wittlin S, Winzeler EA, et al. The
8. Cimanga K, De Bruyne T, Pieters L, Vlietinck AJ, Turger CA. In vitro and
activities of current antimalarial drugs on the life cycle stages of Plasmo-
in vivo antiplasmodial activity of cryptolepine and related alkaloids from
dium: a comparative study with human and rodent parasites. PLoS Med.
Cryptolepis sanguinolenta. J Nat Prod. 1997;60:688–91.
2012;9:e1001169.
9. Wright CW, Addae-Kyereme J, Breen AG, Brown JE, Cox MF, Croft SL, et al.
29. Greenwood BM. Asymptomatic malaria infections—do they matter?
Synthesis and evaluation of cryptolepine analogues for their potential as
Parasitol Today. 1987;3:206–14.
new antimalarial agents. J Med Chem. 2001;44:3187–94.
30. Stepniewska K, Price RN, Sutherland CJ, Drakeley CJ, von Seidlein L,
10. Kuntworbe N, Martini N, Brimble M, Alany GR, Al-Kassas R. Isolation and
Nosten F, et al. Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte dynamics in areas of
development of an HPLC method for the detection and quantification
different malaria endemicity. Malar J. 2008;7:249.
of cryptolepine and its application in the determination of the total
cryptolepine content in the root powder of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta.
Pharmacol Pharm. 2012;3:263–70.