Offshore Magazine - May - June 2023
Offshore Magazine - May - June 2023
Offshore Magazine - May - June 2023
PLUS:
NORTH SEA
Tax regime impact
on drilling
GEOSCIENCES
Seismic survey market
on the upswing
ESG FOCUS
Green hydrogen
pilot project
SPECIAL REPORT
Remote operations
COMMENTARY
Rise of the robots
2305_06OFF_C1-C4.indd
2306OFF_ABS.indd 1 2 5/22/23
5/10/23 8:46
2:38 AM
PM
MAY/JUNE 2023
DECOMMISIONING
ESG FOCUS
COVER STORY: DRILLING RIG REPORT
15 Adrilling
tale of two North Seas: Norway incentivizes
while UK levy could lead to rig loss
Global demand for harsh environment semis
may pull rigs from UK North Sea
GEOSCIENCES
SPECIAL REPORT:
REMOTE INSPECTIONS & OPERATIONS
30 The rise of remote operations in
OVERVIEW
increasing efficiencies of
offshore platform inspections
Autonomous drones are lowering risk while 41 Affordable offshore well
REMOTE-CONTROLLED OPERATIONS
increasing data quality and efficiency for monitoring lowers P&A costs
complex offshore platform inspections Digital innovations are driving adoption
of satellite-powered monitoring
44 AIunplanned
in tandem with low-latency video
tools improving HSE, reducing
downtime
39 Autonomous robots use AI for data
collection and intervention services AI is unequivocally transforming
offshore operations
AI streamlines subsea operations,
DEPARTMENTS
45 Examining
enhances productivity and safety
an evolution in FPSO
autonomous operations
40
3 ONLINE Troubleshooting problems has become
A new project is underway to
4 COMMENT a more manageable process advance safety performances
5 DATA C-I performs remote survey work offshore of a global FPSO fleet
Guyana from its Louisiana headquarters
6 GLOBAL E&P
8 SUBSEA SYSTEMS
9 RIGS & VESSELS
1 1 GULF OF MEXICO
46 BUSINESS BRIEFS
47 ADVERTISERS’ INDEX
48 BEYOND THE HORIZON
The latest news is posted daily for the offshore energy industry covering technology, companies, personnel moves, and products. GROUP PUBLISHER Diana Smith
dsmith@endeavorb2b.com
CHIEF EDITOR/CONFERENCES EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
VIDEOS WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/VIDEOS David Paganie
dpaganie@endeavorb2b.com
MANAGING EDITOR Bruce A. Beaubouef
bbeaubouef@endeavorb2b.com
EDITOR-EUROPE Jeremy Beckman
jbeckman@endeavorb2b.com
EDITOR and DIRECTOR OF
SPECIAL REPORTS Ariana Hurtado
ahurtado@endeavorb2b.com
POSTER EDITOR E. Kurt Albaugh, P.E.
Kurt.albaugh@yahoo.com
ART DIRECTOR Meg Fuschetti
The search for alternative marine fuels Top 5 projects to watch in 2023
PRODUCTION MANAGER Josh Troutman
Rig operators and vessel owners are The five projects were selected on the jtroutman@endeavorb2b.com
hoping to reduce their emissions through basis of upcoming FID, and also use of AD SERVICE MANAGER Shirley Gamboa
the use of ammonia, hydrogen, methanol, unique technologies, innovative solutions, sgamboa@endeavorb2b.com
biofuels, compressed natural gas, and LNG and renewable energy components. AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Emily Martin
WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/14292469 WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/14290806
endeavorbusinessmedia.com
Corporate Officers
CEO Chris Ferrell
PRESIDENT June Griffin
CFO Mark Zadell
COO Patrick Raines
CRO Reggie Lawrence
Deepsea mining – opportunities Offshore wind energy and the CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER Jacquie Niemiec
and challenges problem of global stilling CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL OFFICER
Tracy Kane
The energy transition is driving The phenomenon of “global terrestrial
EVP INDUSTRIAL GROUP Mike Christian
demand for resources that deepsea stilling” may pose a significant reality
Offshore Customer Service:
mining may be able to extract. check on the offshore wind industry. P.O. Box 3257, Northbrook, IL 60065-3257
WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/14289625 WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/14289124 Tel: (847) 559-7598
Email: OFF@omeda.com
CUSTOM PUBLISHING Roy Markum
rmarkum@endeavorb2b.com
MAPS & POSTERS WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/RESOURCES/MAPS-POSTERS Tel: (713) 963-6220
REPRINT SALES
2023 US Gulf of Mexico Map WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/14289756 Please contact your sales associate.
Offshore® (USPS Permit 403-760, ISSN 0030-0608 print, ISSN
2688-3295 online) is published bi-monthly in Jan/Feb, Mar/Apr, May/
Jun, Jul/Aug, Sep/Oct, Nov/Dec by Endeavor Business Media, LLC.
1233 Janesville Ave., Fort Atkinson, WI 53538. Periodical postage paid
ON-DEMAND WEBINARS WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/WEBCASTS at Fort Atkinson, WI, and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER:
Send address changes to Offshore, PO Box 3257, Northbrook, IL
60065-3257. SUBSCRIPTIONS: Publisher reserves the right to reject
Safety First: How to Protect Your Crew Through Better non-qualified subscriptions. Subscription prices: U.S. ($158.75
per year); Canada/Mexico ($206.25 per year); All other countries
Grab Sampling System Design ($260.00 per year). All subscriptions are payable in U.S. funds. Send
Sampling any fluids under high pressure—let alone toxic, corrosive, or flammable subscription inquiries to Offshore, PO Box 3257, Northbrook, IL 60065-
3257. Customer service can be reached toll-free at 877-382-9187 or at
substances—can be a hazardous job. And while we all like to say, “Safety first!”, the reality is OFF@omeda.com for magazine subscription assistance or questions.
Printed in the USA. Copyright 2023 Endeavor Business Media, LLC.
that safety is not always top of mind for grab sample station operators focused on more All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or
pressing day-to-day considerations. If you can relate, this May 17 webinar is for you. Spend transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopies, recordings, or any information storage or
an hour with a grab sampling expert and walk away better equipped to protect the people retrieval system without permission from the publisher. Endeavor
Business Media, LLC does not assume and hereby disclaims any
drawing samples in your facility while keeping those samples representative of the product liability to any person or company for any loss or damage caused
by errors or omissions in the material herein, regardless of whether
you’re processing. WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/14292113 such errors result from negligence, accident, or any other cause
whatsoever. The views and opinions in the articles herein are not to
be taken as official expressions of the publishers, unless so stated.
The publishers do not warrant either expressly or by implication, the
factual accuracy of the articles herein, nor do they so warrant any
Offshore magazine accepts editorial contributions. To submit an article, please review the views or opinions by the authors of said articles.
guidelines on our website by following this link. WWW.OFFSHORE-MAG.COM/PAGE/ARTICLE-SUBMISSION
T
he critical role of oil and gas supply for an tric topsides that could lower emissions by up to
orderly energy transition has never been in 30%. Both Petrobras and BP are investing in tech-
question to those that work in the industry. nologies to lower the carbon footprint of their oil
But in recent years, policy and social chang- and gas assets.
es, and investor ESG requirements, have influenced Hess has allocated $3.7 billion this year for its oil
structural changes within many operating compa- and gas E&P capital and exploration budget, with
nies. Part of the changes are related to corporate more than 80% of it directed to its developments
marketing and external messaging. Many compa- offshore Guyana. The operator strategically targets
nies have changed logos, branding, and messaging what it considers to be high margin and low carbon
to support new strategic objectives. intensive prospects in high growth basins.
One important message that has been seeming- Shell talked at OTC extensively about how it
ly muted within these communication efforts is adapted to a new business environment to bring
the critical role of oil and gas in the energy tran- its Vito project in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico
sition. This is changing, as the geopolitical events to first production earlier this year. And now it is
of 2022 have reinforced the need for balance in applying lessons from Vito to Whale, its next deep-
energy security, affordability, and sustainability. water GoM project.
Fossil fuels still account for about 80% share of The best way forward for deepwater to be con-
primary energy needs, and oil demand is expect- sidered more sustainable – and essential to long-
ed to reach a record high by the end of this year. term corporate investments plans – is to co-locate
It was encouraging to see oil and gas technolo- the resources with renewables and CCS, according
gy presentations as a big part of the agenda of this to Julie Wilson with Wood Mackenzie. She calls
year’s Offshore Technology Conference. One session these co-located basins “energy super basins”
addressed the role of deepwater in the energy tran- of the future.
sition. All the panelists, including three from oper- Still, oil and gas continue to be core to the tra-
ators – BP, Petrobras, and Hess – pointed to oil and ditional operator’s investment strategy; the differ-
gas as the core component of their energy invest- ence today is the level of comfort in voicing the
ment plans. BP is transforming into an integrated corporate imperative.
To respond to articles in Offshore, or to offer articles for publication, contact the chief editor at dpaganie@endeavorb2b.com.
down from Q1 2022. Most 2022 jackup work 120 Q1 2023 duration (rig-years)
was for the Middle East, where operators are Q1 2022 fixture count
working to get many of these rigs operating, 100 Q1 2023 fixture count
OFS revenue growth improves Year-on-year growth rate of key financial parameter
SLB, Baker Hughes and Halliburton are on for major OFS trio
SLB
course for strong financial performances in 40% 600%
Halliburton
the coming quarters after the trio of oilfield 540.3%
Baker Hughes
services (OFS) giants all posted a sparking set 29.8%
32.5%
2.1%
3.6%
500%
margins and cash flow in Q1 2023 compared 20% 18.2% 0.8% 300%
to Q1 2022. The trio has focused on returns to
shareholders and increasing dividends, with 200%
151.9%
two hatching a share repurchase plan for the 10%
100%
year. Market fundaments necessary for OFS 34.9% 41.8%
49.2% 42.3% 34.3%
11.6%
players to boost their financial performance 0% 0%
will remain strong for the rest of the year. Jackup Incremental adjusted CFO Capex Dividends paid
EBITDA* margin
—Rystad Energy
Note: Results of Baker Hughes includes both its business segments. Year-on-year
calculation based on 1Q 2023 and 1Q 2o22
*EBITDA: earnings before interest, tax, deprecition and amortization Source: Rystad Encergy ServiceCube — Oil & Gas
NORTH AMERICA block off Guyana, in 2,000 m water depth. MODEC is constructing
KBR has a Letter of Intent from Equinor to perform the topsides the 250,000 b/d FPSO, named Errea Wittu: this will be connected to
FEED for a newbuild FPSO for the Bay du Nord project offshore 44 production and injection wells at up to 10 subsea drill centers.
Newfoundland. This will produce oil from various discovered fields Technip FMC will supply the subsea trees, 12 manifolds and associ-
in 650-1,170 m water depth in the Flemish Pass basin, 500 km ated controls and tie-in equipment, while Saipem will design, fabri-
north-east of St. Johns. KBR’s scope of work includes supporting cate and install the connecting SURF facilities, using its FDS2 and
Equinor with development of a combined cycle power system and Saipem Constellation vessels for the offshore campaign. Recent-
other technologies to minimize the platform’s emissions and crew ly, the Stabroek licensees boosted their reserves with the Lan-
complement and maximize the use of digital solutions. Equinor is cetfish-1 discovery well, drilled by the Noble Don Taylor drillship.
targeting first oil in the late 2020s.
Petrobras has produced first oil from its revitalization project at the
The Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum post-salt Marlim and Viador fields in the Campos basin off Brazil.
Board has included 28 parcels off eastern and south-eastern New- The FPSOs Anna Nery, which started operations last month, and
foundland in its latest Call for Bids, which will remain open until MODEC’s Anita Garibaldi MV33, are replacing nine platforms on the
November 1. Exploration licenses for successful applicants could two fields and should eventually deliver 150,000 boe/d combined.
be awarded early next year.
The company is also part of the Equinor-led consortium that has
Shell Offshore has commissioned Worley to perform FEED and just taken FID on a $9.9-billion development in Block BM-C-33 in
detail design studies for a lightweight floating production platform the pre-salt Santos basin, covering three accumulations discov-
at the Sparta development, 170 mi off the Louisiana coast. Shell ered by Repsol in 2010. Collectively, Pão de Açúcar, Gávea and Seat
deployed Worley’s concept for two previous platforms: the compa- hold over 1 BBoe recoverable: Repsol Sinopec Resources is the
ny and partner Equinor expect to take FID on Sparta later this year. other member of the current consortium. Plans call for a 126,000
b/d FPSO with a gas production capacity of 16 MMcm/d, and facil-
Wintershall Dea’s recent Kan discovery in Mexico’s offshore Sur- ities topside to process the gas and oil/condensate and specify
este basin could hold up to 300 MMboe in place, initial analysis these for sale without the need for further onshore processing.
suggests. The well, drilled by the Borr Ran jackup 25 km from the
Tabasco coast in 50 m of water, encountered over 170 m net pay
sands in the Upper Miocene. The Block 30 consortium, which
includes Harbour Energy and Sapura OMV, will finalize an apprais-
al plan by the end of July.
Pemex has submitted a Unit Development Plan (UDP) for the giant
Zama oilfield to Mexico’s National Commission of Hydrocarbons
(CNH) for approval. Zama extends across two contiguous blocks:
Pemex and the Block 7 partnership of Talos Energy, Wintershall
Dea and Talos Energy agreed to form an integrated project team
to take the development into the construction phase. Main com- Proposed field layout for the BM-C-33 project
ponents of the UDP are two fixed platforms, 46 dry-tree wells and in the Campos basin. COURTESY EQUINOR
two 68-km subsea pipelines exporting the oil and gas to new pro-
cessing facilities at the onshore Maritima Das Bocas terminal. Sales gas will be exported through a 200-km offshore pipeline
to reception infrastructure at the Cabiúnas terminal onshore in
Macaé, with processed liquids offloaded via shuttle tankers.
SOUTH AMERICA
McDermott is working on the FEED for Shell’s Manatee gas
development offshore Trinidad and Tobago, said to be one of the
WEST AFRICA
country’s largest discoveries. The work scope covers a wellhead The refurbished FPSO Baleine (ex-Firenze) has sailed to Côte d’Ivo-
platform, export pipeline system shore approach, midstream pipe- ire for service on Eni’s Baleine field development in blocks CI-101
line and onshore control room. and CI-802. Following the upgrades, the facility can process up
to 15,000 b/d of oil and around 25 MMcf/d of associated gas, with
ExxonMobil and its partners have taken FID on the$12.7-billion the latter to be exported to shore through a new subsea pipeline.
Uaru project, their fifth FPSO-based development in the Stabroek Eni aimed to start production this month, less than two years
NORTH SEA
Shell U.K. expects the FPSO Haewene Brim to produce more than
30,000 boe/d at the Pierce field in the UK central North Sea fol-
lowing upgrades at Aibel’s yard in Houston. The project will switch
production from Pierce, which came onstream in 1999, from oil Subsea 7 will install the subsea infrastructure for the
alone to gas and oil, with the gas exported through a new subsea Raven Infills project offshore Egypt. COURTESY SUBSEA 7
pipeline connecting to the SEGAL pipeline system and onward to
the St Fergus terminal north of Aberdeen. ADNOC and bp have jointly offered to acquire a 50% interest from
Delek Group in NewMed Energy, a partner to Chevron in the Levi-
NEO Energy is set to take control of the Greater Buchan Area athan and Tamar gasfields offshore Israel. If accepted, this could
licenses in the central UK sector after negotiating a 50% farm-in represent the first step of their plan to form a joint venture com-
with current operator Jersey Oil & Gas (JOG). With NEO agreeing pany focused on gas developments, including in the East Medi-
to part-fund JOG’s costs, this opens the way to a redevelopment terranean region.
of the shut-in Buchan oilfield and a phased development of vari-
ous other discoveries in the area.
ASIA-PACIFIC
BlueNord (formerly Noreco) has applied for a license in the Danish Valeura Energy has resumed oil production from the Wassana
sector containing the Elly-Luke gas discovery. If successful, an field in the Gulf of Thailand, which had been shut down prema-
award could follow later this year, with work then starting on a turely by previous operator KrisEnergy in 2020. Output has been
technical review ahead of a possible 5-bcm development. In addi- ramping up steadily as the wells are activated sequentially, and a
tion, BlueNord has formed a partnership with Semco Maritime to planned infill drilling campaign in Q3 could add a further 5,000 b/d.
assess other oil and gas development opportunities, including
taking on operation of existing fields. Shell Australia has agreed to sell its interests in the Woodside-op-
erated Browse project offshore north-west Australia to bp. The
Browse Joint Venture has been seeking a development solution
BLACK SEA for the Brecknock, Calliance and Torosa fields 425 km north of
Turkish Petroleum Corp (TPAO) has started production from Broome in the Browse basin. Woodside’s last update revealed a
Sakarya, Turkey’s first deepwater gasfield development. The Phase preference for two LNG/LPG/gas FPSOs and a 900-km export
One subsea-beach facilities came onstream only two and a half pipeline connecting to infrastructure serving the North West
years after the discovery in August 2020, and should deliver up to Shelf Project. ●
HP/HT fields.
Transocean announced the arriv-
al of its eighth-generation drillships
Deepwater Atlas and Deepwater Titan to
the Gulf in 2022 and 2023, respectively.
The Deepwater Atlas and Deepwater
Titan are the world’s first eighth gen-
eration ultra-deepwater drillships
and only rigs to feature a three-mil-
lion-pound hook-load. Importantly,
these drillships also include the first
20,000 psi well control system, a
feature that has important implica-
tions for deepwater Gulf of Mexico
development.
High-pressure, high-temperature
reservoirs have been a challenge for
Gulf E&P for the past decade or more.
Overcoming the HP/HT challenge,
at least on the drilling front, stands
to be hugely important for the US
Gulf of Mexico as a producing region
going forward.
Recently, Offshore spoke w ith
Marijana Sosic, Manager, Technical
Marketing, with Transocean. She
offered some thoughts about the capa-
bilities of the new rigs, and what they
mean for Gulf of Mexico and deepwa-
ter development going forward.
T
he global supply of offshore drilling rigs continued to
shrink last year, even as demand picked up across mul-
tiple regions. At the end of 2021, the total supply of drill-
ships, semisubs, and jackups was 723. By the end of 2022, the
total had fallen to 709. Over this same period, the number
of rigs under contract increased to 451 at the end of 2022
from 418 at the end of 2021. A total of 254, or 56%, of the rigs
under contract at the end of the year were managed by the China Oilfield Services Ltd. once again stands atop Offshore’s
ten largest rig contractors in terms of managed fleet size Top Ten Drillers list with a fleet of 58 rigs. The COSL Promoter
for jackups, semisubs and drillships. This is up from 49% rig, shown here, has recently been undertaking a drilling and
of the fleet at the end of 2021. P&A campaign for Equinor offshore Norway. COURTESY COSL
Sales for conversions, recycling decline for drilling purposes in 2022, only five were jackups not
In response to rising demand, rig owners are now less moti- intended for the Middle East market. The four Middle East
vated to sell their rigs outside the industry than they have contractors that purchased jackups last year were ADES,
been for the past several years. Almost all of the rigs sold ADNOC, Arabian Drilling, and Shelf Drilling.
for recycling last year were built before the 1990s. Two One notable purchase transaction involved the merger
notable conversions were confirmed last year. Seadrill between Noble Corp. and Maersk Drilling. The UK’s
sold the semisubs Sevan Brasil and Sevan Driller to New Competition and Markets Authority required the pair to
Fortress Energy for conversion to non-drilling units for its divest some jackups in connection with the merger out of
LNG business. concern for reduced competition in the North Sea. Shelf
Conversely, we saw an increase in rig sales within the Drilling, which prior to this did not have a presence in the
drilling industry. Many of these sales were tied to rig con- North Sea, stepped in and acquired five jackups – Noble
tractors in the Middle East going on a buying spree of pre- Sam Turner (to be renamed Shelf Drilling Winner), Noble
mium jackups from around the world as they sought to Sam Hartley (Shelf Drilling Fortress), Noble Lloyd Noble (Shelf
build their fleets to meet demand. Out of the 41 jackups sold Drilling Barsk), Noble Houston Colbert (Shelf Drilling Odyssey),
T
o paraphrase from Dickens’ classic of the UK North Sea less appealing, tion semi by a UK operator has been
work, the North Sea has become a some drilling contractors are now cancelled after the company over-
tale of two seas: the UK North Sea anticipating moving their rigs out of hauled its UK drilling plans. The rig
and the Norwegian North Sea. The the North Sea and into more reward- could have been contracted until 2030
difference, which is already being ing environments. Harsh environ- if all options had been taken up but
manifested in drilling activity and ment semisubs could be particulalry will now be available on completion
field development plans, comes down impacted, as their owners and manag- of its current UK drilling campaign
largely to extremely contrasting fiscal ers look to deploy these high-demand in mid-2024.
regimes and regulatory policies. rigs for drilling campaigns off South The International Association
In the UK North Sea, drilling activ- Africa or offshore Australia. of Drilling Contractors’ North Sea
ity has been hampered by the Energy For exa mple, Odf jell Drilling Chapter recently sent a letter to all 650
Profits Levy (EPL) enacted last spring, recently announced that its semisub- UK MPs and 129 MSPs warning that
a fee that was subsequently increased mersible Deepsea Mira will leave the further harsh-environment rigs could
by an additional 10% late last year, North Sea for a 300-day contract be “lost for good” to the UK due to the
bringing the headline tax rate for with TotalEnergies in Namibia in 2Q windfall tax changes.
UK oil and gas producers to 75%. 2023. Other rigs are departing the The North Sea rig supply is now
The increased fees have led some UK UK North Sea too. The only drillship 40% below what it was in March 2017,
North Sea operators to slow their drill- in the region, Deep Value Driller, has Westwood’s RigLogix has calculated,
ing campaigns, and put the brakes on been bareboat chartered by Saipem with 13 rigs departing the region in the
field development projects that could and will move to Cote D’Ivoire to past two years either for work else-
have seen FID this year. drill for Eni this year. Apache recent- where or retirement. Two more – the
Already this year, the UK North Sea, ly announced an early contract ter- semis Hercules and the aforementioned
which has been fairly active in recent mination for Diamond Offshore’s Deepsea Mira – will relocate later this
years, has seen a decline in floating Ocean Patriot. The semisubmersible year to eastern Canada and Namibia.
drilling rig activity. With the global rig rig should now become available in A Westwood Insight published
market tightening, and the economics July, more than 400 days earlier than last November found that despite
T
he future is looking bright for seis-
mic service providers this year.
Recent a na lysis by Esg ia n
revealed that seismic campaigns and
capex budgets are all up, with major
seismic player highlights that include:
• CGG: fourth-quarter 2022 delivered
higher-than-anticipated multicli-
ent data and equipment sales;
• PGS: 2022 multiclient late sales
second highest on record; and
• TGS: highest fourth-quarter 2022 Petrobras has contracted a consortium of Alcatel Submarine Networks and Maersk
late sales since 2014. Supply Service to construct and install a permanent seismic monitoring system offshore
Offshore recently chatted with ana- Rio de Janeiro. COURTESY MAERSK SUPPLY SERVICE
lysts from Rystad Energy and S&P
Global about the recovering seismic share of exploration capital expendi- 35% year-on-year and has since said
survey market to gauge their thoughts ture, while 20% of the year’s total is it expects this to continue, though it is
on the current trends and outlook for set to go on frontier basins, a hike of unlikely to replicate the rate increase
the remainder of the year. more than 50% from 2022.” experienced between 2021 and 2022,
“With increased exploration activ- Track ing the ma r ine seismic according to Sinclair.
ity, demand for seismic services is market and its vessels, Beth Sinclair, “The uptick in multiclient late sales
expected to grow by an additional an analyst with Petrodata SeismicBase and the success in obtaining full pre-
14%, or $1.1 billion, and total almost by S&P Global, added, “The consensus funding for multiclient sweeps off
$9.3 billion in 2023,” said Binny Bagga, within the industry is that 2023 and Brazil, West Africa and Southeast Asia
vice president of supply chain analy- beyond will see the seismic market demonstrate the current appetite for
sis with Rystad Energy. “Key offshore go from strength to strength as the exploration once again, and seismic
regions such as the Gulf of Mexico upturn is deemed to be finally in companies will be happy to be bolster-
[GoM] and the North Sea are expect- full swing. There is real optimism. ing their coffers. Especially the vessel
ed to remain core to the seismic Continued energy security concerns owners,” she said. “The streamers in
market, with strong growth expect- and improved profits have seen oil the global fleet are generally getting
ed in Norway. The surge in oil and and gas companies increase their E&P quite old, and to replace a full spread
gas prices in the past year following spending, which in turn has seen the costs approximately $50 million, as
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has led revenues of seismic firms rise.” quoted by PGS.”
to an increased appetite for offshore Meanwhile, companies are reacti-
exploration spending among majors Vessel updates vating vessels, such as Shearwater’s
and national oil companies alike. In the final quarter of 2022, PGS report- SW Mikkelsen and SW Gallian last
Mature basins are set to take the lion’s ed that vessel day rates had risen by year and PGS’ Ramform Victory this
Production data
for public companies reporting decom-
missioning liability are included
within a broader category called pro-
underpins successful
visions with (slightly) different rules
and requirements than AROs, but gen-
erally speaking the two liability clas-
worldwide ARO
sifications are quite similar.
Reporting requirements
For public companies that are orga-
analysis
nized under the laws of the United
States or are listed on US exchanges,
US Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) are required, also
referred to as the Financial Accounting
Planners should understand relationship between Reporting Standards (FASB). In other
asset retirement obligations, production rates countries, International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued
by the International Accounting
Mark J. Kaiser, LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY Standards Board (IASB) are employed.
Both standards require decom-
P
ublic oil and gas companies are site to its original condition. These are missioning liabilities to be recorded
required to report the present value called asset retirement obligations at the present value of the expendi-
of their decommissioning liability, and public oil and gas companies are tures expected to be required to settle
referred to as asset retirement obliga- required to disclose the present value the obligation. The amount should
tions (AROs) and provisions, for all oil 2306OFFkais
of their AROs annually in theirfigures
finan- reflect the best estimate that a com-
and gas assets worldwide where there cial reporting. pany would pay to settle the obli-
is a legal obligation to perform. Outside the US, legal requirements gation at the balance sheet date or
One well-known feature of the oil for decommissioning 10000 vary widely to transfer it to a third party at that
and gas industry is the strong cor- depending on the country’s regulato- time. These standards are similar but
relation that exists between produc- ry regime and the contract terms that y = 0.0884x
not identical, with differences in ter-
tion and reserves. In the first part of 2306OFFkais figuresand production. R² =minology,
0.8994
Production (MMboe)
1000
ed to its expected settlement value. similar types of rigs. Estimated dura- counted conditions, and this appears
y = 0.0215x
Figure 1. Production
1000 anvs.
Where provedexists
obligation reserves
for a newfor integrated companies
tion is normally based and
on
R² = 0.7809 those
historic that
jobs exclude Saudi assumption among
to be a common
Aramco and the four
facility Russian
or item of plant, majors
such as(“Integrated-”),
oil and adjusted year
for ending Dec.conditions.
site-specific 31, 2021. companies, while high discount and
natural gas production or transporta- inflation rates (4-8%/yr) assume sig-
tion facilities, this liability is recog- Timing nificantly lower present value to these
100
nized on construction or installation. The cessation of production is esti- costs. Companies do not have to report
10000
Similarly, where an obligation exists for mated by
y = 0.0884x decline curve methods and the discount/inflation rates applied,
a well, the liability is recognized when assumptions
R² = 0.8994 on commodity prices, but rates are sometimes disclosed.
1000 it is drilled. An obligation for decom- operating cost and economic limits,
Production (MMboe)
10
missioning may also crystalize
1,000 during
10,000 similar to the standardized 1,000,000
100,000 measure Commodity prices
the period of operation of a well, facil- of proved
Reserves (MMboe) reserves (STM) calculations. Commodity price assumptions impact
100 ity or item of plant through a change Companies that follow FASB guide- ARO cost directly and indirectly through
y = 0.0875x
in legislation or ythrough
= 0.086x a decision to
Integrated
lines apply
Integrated-
proved reserves P1 in their their impact on market cost assump-
R² = 0.9253 R² = 0.9043
terminate operations (e.g., additional timing assessment, while companies tions and timing effects. In STM compu-
10
or lesser work may be required when following IASB guidelines may apply 2P tations, commodity prices are assumed
Figure
wells1.or Production
infrastructure vs.are proved
preservedreserves for integrated
reserves (proved plus companies and those
probable), which thethat exclude
average of the Saudi
last reporting period,
Aramco
or and the
decommissioned four to Russian
a differentmajors
stan- (“Integrated-”),
will normally year
add ending
several Dec.
years to 31,
the 2021.
but in ARO estimation there are no spe-
1
dard);
1 an obligation
10 may also
100 arise in 1000time when 10000production is
100000 no longer cific requirements on what commodi-
Reserves (MMboe) ty prices should be applied. One would
10000 think similar price assumptions would
y = 0.0884x be applied in both ARO and STM calcu-
Onshore Integrated- Offshore R² = 0.8994 lations, but this is not required.
Production (MMboe)
1000
Figure 2. Production vs. proved reserves for independent onshore, independent offshore, and
Categorization
integrated companies excluding Saudi Aramco and the Russian majors (“Integrated-”),P year ending
ubl ic compa n ies a nd gover n-
Dec. 31, 2021. 100 y = 0.0875x ment-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)
y = 0.086x
R² = 0.9253 R² = 0.9043 are organized into integrated and
10 independent company groups, and
two subcategories for independents
are applied, primarily offshore and
1 primarily onshore independents.
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Primarily onshore/offshore compa-
Reserves (MMboe) nies have more than half of their pro-
1
Figure 2. Production vs. proved reserves for independent onshore, independent duction onshore/offshore.
Onshore excluding
offshore, and integrated companies Integrated- Offshore
Saudi Aramco and the Russian majors Most national oil companies (NOCs)
(“Integrated-”), year ending December 31, 2021. do not report ARO, STM or well data,
Figure 2. Production vs. proved reserves for independent onshore, independent offshore, and
MAY/JUNE 2023 | www.offshore-mag.com OFFSHORE 23
integrated companies excluding Saudi Aramco and the Russian majors (“Integrated-”), year ending
Dec. 31, 2021.
2305_06OFF22-25kais.indd 23 5/22/23 8:46 AM
DECOMMISIONING CONTINUED
but we include a few NOCs in our sample (e.g., Saudi Aramco, many small companies (5-50 MMboe) such as Callon, DNO,
and the four major Russian majors Gazprom, Lukoil, Novatek, Kosmos Energy, Spirit Energy, and Tullow Oil.
and Rosneft) even though they are of a different character Most onshore companies sampled produce exclusively
than public companies and GSEs, especially in terms of geo- onshore, but five companies also had offshore production
political drivers and the manner of decision making. (ConocoPhillips, DNO, Hess, Marathon Oil, Occidental) rang-
Saudi Aramco and the four Russian companies are all ing between 15-40% total production.
integrated oil and gas companies, but having only a small
percentage of their production offshore (or in the case of Production vs. reserves
1000
Saudi Aramco, low-cost shallow water production), these Reserves are the storehouse of production, and since pro-
companies are more like independent onshore producers in duction operations are subject to the same engineering
y = 0.1387x
STM ($billion)
STM ($billion)
100 year-out, the basic oil and
STM ($billion)
(10% for Lukoil), and thus, these companies1 can100be catego- Year-in R² =gas
0.9845
business models in
R² = 0.9845
rized as primarily onshore producers. 10 capital
100 markets hold fast and true, and this is observed
1000 for they = 0.0967x
y = 0.0967x10000
Two integrated producer groups are identified: production-reserves
Production
10 relationships
(MMboe) shown in Figure
R² = 0.9154 1 for inte-R² = 0.9154
“Integrated” and “Integrated-” where the minus sign10 signi- grated companies, and in Figure 2 for offshore independents
y = 0.092x
fies the exclusion of Saudi Aramco and the four major Russian and onshore producers. y =With
0.092xproduction andR² = reserves varying
0.9209
Integrated- Onshore R² Offshore
= 0.9209
companies from the sample. Independent onshore companies more than1 three orders-of-magnitude, log-log plots are used.
1 10 100 barrels of oil equivalent1000
are denoted “Onshore”, and the “Onshore+” group signifies
10
For integrated companies, 0.022
100 companies excluding 1000 10000
Figure 3. STM vs production
the addition of Saudi Aramco, Gazprom, Lukoil, Novatek, and were produced in 2021 for every boe reserves in the ground. and the Russi
for integrated Production Saudi Aramco
(MMboe)
majors (“Integrated-”), and primarily onshore Production (MMboe) offshore independents, year endin
and primarily
Rosneft to the sample.
1000
Dec. 31, 2021. Integrated- Onshore Offshore
Integrated sample group Integrated- Onshore Offshore
y = 0.1387x
STM ($billion)
The integrated sample group includes 100 Figure 3. STM R² =vs production for integrated companies excluding Saudi
0.9845
19 integrated companies along with Figure 3. STM vs production for integrated
majors (“Integrated-”), andcompanies
primarily excluding
y = 0.0967x
onshore andSaudi Aramco
primarily and thin
offshore
several NOCs. Equinor and Petrobras majors 10 R² = 0.9154
(“Integrated-”), and primarily
Dec. 31, 2021. onshore and primarily offshore independents, ye
are almost exclusively offshore oper- Dec. 31, 2021. y = 0.092x
ators (>90% production derives from R² = 0.9209
offshore fields), whereas about two- 1
100000 10 100 1000 10000
thirds of Pemex and ONGC production
comes from offshore operations. All Production (MMboe)
y = 20.42xfor integrated companies excluding Saudi Aramco and the
Figure 3. STM vs production
other companies, except Saudi Aramco10000
and the four Russian companies, have Russian majors (“Integrated-”),
R² = 0.8573 and primarily
Integrated- onshoreOffshore
Onshore y = 12.821x
and primarily offshore
ARO ($million)
R² = 0.9015
offshore producers R²1000
= 0.8573 y = 6.3969x y = 12.821x
10
ARO ($million)
R² = 0.9015
moderate-sized companies (50-400 1000
2021. Figure 4. ARO vs. production for integrated companies excluding Saudi Aramco and the
MMboe) like Apache, EOG, Hess, Murphy, Russian majors, primarily offshore independents and primarily onshore independents,
FigureIntegrated-
4. ARO vs.Offshore
production Onshore
for integrated companies excluding Saudi
Santos, Wintershall, and Woodside, and year ending
100 December 31, 2021.
majors, primarily offshore independents and primarily onshore independ
24 OFFSHORE Figure 4. ARO vs. 2021.
production for integrated companies
y = 6.3969x excluding
www.offshore-mag.com Saudi
| MAY/JUNE 2023Aramco and th
10
majors, primarily offshore independents and primarily
R² = 0.6918 onshore independents, year ending
2021.
1
2305_06OFF22-25kais.indd 24 1 10 1002 1000 10000 5/22/23 8:46 AM
DECOMMISIONING CONTINUED
If Saudi Aramco and the four Russian companies are exclud- of integrated companies which are more expensive than
ed from the integrated group (Integrated-), the integrated onshore AROs: $20.4/boe (offshore), $12.8/boe (integrated-),
companies produced on average about four times more per and $6.4/boe (onshore).
barrel reserves (0.088 boe/boe). One might not suspect that such strong fits would result,
Public companies produce more of their reserves com- nearly as strong as the STM-production models, but because
pared to NOCs because of their development strategy and AROs/provisions are estimated under broadly similar guide-
capital requirements, and because NOCs are agents of the lines to STM, perhaps the relations are not that surprising since
state subject to their government’s geopolitical aims which AROs are also model constructs like STM.
fall outside profitability criteria. Political factors play a large ARO and production behave in a broadly similar manner
role in NOC decision making hidden behind the veneer of as reserves and STM with production, and since this is
corporate strategy. neither intuitively obvious nor self-evident, an empirical
For primarily onshore and offshore producers, a very sim- demonstration is both convincing and satisfying.
ilar relationship to the Integrated- group results, with the The slopes of the lines in Figure 4 provide valuable
model coefficient being 0.088 and 0.086 boe/boe (Figure 2). quantitative information on the relative difference in ARO
For all three groups, the production-reserves relations are cost per boe production by geographic specialization.
essentially identical. Independent offshore producers realize the highest ARO
unit cost, $20.4/boe, and independent onshore producers
STM vs. production the lowest ARO unit cost, $6.4/boe. Integrated companies,
Production generates revenue and is valued using cash excluding Saudi Aramco and the four Russian majors, fall
flow analysis over the lifetime of assets and reported as in-between these limits at $12.8/boe. ●
the standardized measure of reserves. STM values, along
with production and oil prices, are the three most import- Mark J. Kaiser is Professor at the Center for Energy Studies, Louisiana State University,
ant factors determining a company’s market capitalization Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
and enterprise value.
STM is computed according to a common set of assump-
tions across the FASB universe, and therefore, like proved
reserves, the valuation of reserves and production are expect-
ed to be strongly correlated.
STM and production are linearly related for all compa-
ny groups (Figure 3), with offshore producers realizing the
highest boe value at $139/boe, followed by integrated com-
panies at $96.7/boe, and $92.0/boe for onshore independents.
The slopes of the lines depend on oil price, and will
increase/decrease year-by-year increasing with higher
(average) oil prices during the reporting period and decreas-
ing with lower (average) oil prices.
Only five offshore producers report STM data so caution
is warranted in interpreting the $139/boe statistic. Offshore
companies may or may not fall within the range described
by onshore and integrated companies, $92/boe and $96.7/boe.
The fact that the line segments are roughly parallel is
also no accident, but indicative of industry similarity, at
least in the way STM values are computed, determined via
cash flow models using a similar set of assumptions accord-
ing to regulatory guidelines.
harsh environment
last September.
COURTESY LHYFE
offshore test
phase
Production module expected to be
deployed to an open-sea test site soon
Jeremy Beckman, EDITOR-EUROPE
T
esting of the world’s first offshore green hydrogen pro-
duction pilot plant will shortly transfer from the har-
bour at Saint Nazaire, western France to an open-sea test
site, operated by French engineering school Centrale Nante.
Nantes-based Lhyfe, which produced the first hydro-
gen using power from onshore wind turbines in 2021, has
adapted its technology to operate on a floating platform,
named “Sealhyfe.” The production module, secured to a
Wavegem wave energy structure, began operating in the which assisted the design of the underwater connection
harbour last September and has been producing up to 400 to the Floatgen wind turbine developed by a consortium
kg/d of hydrogen. On completion of this initial six-month led by BW Ideol. This recently exceeded 22 GW of electric-
phase, the Sealhyfe platform will be relocated to the SEM- ity production since commissioning in late 2019, and has
REV test site in the Atlantic, 20 km from Le Croisic. Here it operated at maximum capacity for more than 80% of the
will be powered by the Floatgen floating offshore wind tur- subsequent period.
bine (another demonstrator) that has been operating con- According to Lyhfe’s Technical Director Thomas Créach,
tinuously since installation in 2018. who has a background in offshore oil and gas and renew-
Lhfye, the project developer, collaborated with US com- able energy (as do other members of the management team),
pany Plug Power Inc to adapt the latter’s electrolyzer to power used during the initial trial period in the harbour is
operate on a floating platform. Other French offshore/ supplied locally via the French marine renewable energy
marine renewable energy specialists contributing to the hub: the electrolyser has a 1-MW requirement and the
program are local shipyard/engineering group Chantiers system auxiliaries 0.3 MW. The platform, with an overall
de L’Atlantique, responsible for structural strengthening weight of 330 metric tons, measures 21 m long and 14 m
to withstand environmental stress, the ventilation sys- wide, with an above-water height of 6 m.
tems and the electrical architecture; GEPS Techno, which “All the tests that are meant to be performed offshore
developed the Wavegem platform, also working with Eiffage (for a longer period of time) have been done during the
Energies Systèmes on integration of the production equip- harbour tests phase,” Créach said. “The remaining part is
ment with the platform; Port of Saint-Nazaire, which facil- the impact of the waves and exposure to weather condi-
itated assembly and testing; and Kraken Subsea Solutions, tions, which will be tested at SEM-REV. The system has
/////MOVING
///// FORWARD
OCT 23 – 25, 2023
Moody Gardens Hotel and Convention Center
Galveston, TX // offshore-event.com
2305_06OFF26-28_lhyfe.indd
2304OFF_House_DTOPS.indd 281 5/22/23
2/26/23 8:46
7:52 AM
PM
SPECIAL REPORT
REMOTE INSPECTIONS
& OPERATIONS
An overview of the
latest trends in drones,
robotics, AUVs and
remote-controlled
operations
I
n the age of digital transformation, remote operations have tially harsh environment offshore. The offshore energy industry
become increasingly prevalent in the offshore energy industry. is known for its harsh and dynamic working environment, and
There has been a rise of remote technologies, such as unmanned remote operations can reduce the risk of accidents and injuries.
surface vessels, drones, robotics, remotely operated vehicles By using unstaffed or lightly staffed platforms, workers can avoid
(ROVs) and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), that have exposure to hazardous materials and dangerous environments.
had an impact on offshore operations. From reducing travel costs This can improve safety and reduces insurance costs and liability.
to improving safety and efficiency, remote technologies have rev- Modernizing inspections with remote operations can also
olutionized the industry, making it more sustainable, diverse and improve the accuracy and speed of them. By using drones,
resilient. The world of remote operations has the potential to shape advanced cameras and sensors, inspections can be conducted
the future of the offshore energy industry. with greater precision and efficiency. This reduces the need for
physical presence offshore, which can be costly and time-con-
suming. With remote inspections, issues can be identified and
addressed quickly, reducing downtime and improving overall
productivity.
Finally, remote operations can contribute to sustainability
efforts. By reducing travel, companies can lower their overall
carbon footprint and minimize their impact on the environment.
Remote operations also allow for better resource utilization, as
companies can optimize their operations and reduce waste. This
contributes to a more sustainable and efficient industry overall.
Challenges
While there are many benefits with remote operations, there are
several challenges that must be addressed. With remote opera-
tions, the activities are often located far from the central office
Remota has remote operations centers in Norway that operate and may have limited access to communication channels. This
different offshore applications and subsea ROVs. COURTESY REMOTA can make it difficult to coordinate tasks and ensure that everyone
is on the same page. Companies must invest in robust communi-
The industry has always been associated with complex and cation systems to ensure that workers can communicate effec-
hazardous operations that require a lot of labor, time and resourc- tively and efficiently.
es. But with the recent push toward sustainability and cost effi- High latency can be a significant challenge for remote opera-
ciency, the industry is turning to remote operations as part of tions, particularly when using geo-stationary satellite systems for
the solution to these challenges. Remote operations refer to the communication. Latency refers to the delay between when data
use of unstaffed or lightly staffed vessels or platforms to con- are sent and received, and with satellite systems, the distance
duct tasks offshore, from inspections and maintenance to drill- that the data must travel can result in significant delays. This is a
ing and production. physical limitation of how fast the signal travels.
While low-orbit satellite systems offer many advantages, such
Benefits of remote ops as global coverage and lower cost compared to traditional satellite
One of the main benefits of remote operations is reduced travel systems, they can also suffer from high latency. This delay can be
costs. Offshore operations require a lot of travel, and this can especially problematic in remote operations, where split-second
be a significant cost for companies. By using remote operations, decision-making is often required.
T
he oil and gas industry is under pressure to deliver value in a
turbulent economic environment. Digital strategies can provide
distinct advantages, and for years, energy executives have expect-
ed drones to play a significant role in operations.
Progress has been seen, but mass adoption of drone technolo-
gy for offshore platform inspections hasn’t happened yet. Artificial
intelligence (AI) is rapidly changing the paradigm with reduced
costs, increased efficiency and improved safety. Skydio, the largest
US drone manufacturer, is partnering with industry leaders such as
Shell and contractor CAN USA to de-risk, demonstrate and prog-
ress the inspection capabilities available for offshore operations.
A
dvanced robotic technology is revolutionizing offshore facility
inspections, making them safer, more efficient and cost-ef-
fective. This article delves into the capabilities of autonomous
inspection robots, their impact on the oil and gas industry, and
their potential to transform offshore asset monitoring as well
as reviews various types of robots and the future prospects of
fully autonomous, unmanned offshore facilities operated by
robotic workers.
Automating offshore
facility inspections
The wide variety of offshore oil and gas
platforms, such as fixed platforms, com-
pliant tower platforms, jackup platforms ANYmal X, the world’s only Ex-proof
and floating production systems, share legged inspection robot, performs
common operational challenges arising inspection missions on an offshore
from potentially explosive atmospheres, platform. COURTESY PETRONAS
complex infrastructure, extreme weather
conditions and remote locations. delivering frequent, accurate and reliable
Operators constantly seek real-time results. High-quality sensors, extreme
data from their assets to monitor asset mobility and AI-based inspection intelli-
health and take timely preventive action. gence allow these robots to perceive and
Today fixed installed sensors already analyze beyond human capabilities and
monitor critical process aspects like tem- be easily deployed, even in older brown-
perature, pressure and flow rates. Additionally, operators per- field facilities. Inspection robots perform continuous monitoring
form regular inspection rounds, typically within each work shift, with hundreds of inspection points per deployment and execute
to look for signs of damage or wear on equipment. However, the multiple precise tasks simultaneously. Inspections can be sched-
logistical challenges and expenses of accessing offshore plat- uled as routine, relevance-based monitoring, or on-demand, con-
forms, as well as the importance of personnel safety, complicate ditional or ad hoc inspections.
these inspections. Specific offshore inspection jobs automated by these
To mitigate safety risks and collect better data than manual robots include:
inspections, oil and gas companies are increasingly adopting • Visual and acoustic monitoring of assets in operation to detect
autonomous ground robots for routine inspection work. The latest equipment failures early and take preventive maintenance
generation of autonomous inspection robots can traverse oil and actions to avoid costly defects and downtime;
gas facilities designed for humans and collect data in complex • Identifying thermal anomalies to gain previously undetect-
environments without human intervention. ed insights into equipment health through thermal trend
analyses; and
Inspection robots automating jobs • Real-time monitoring and localization of the presence and
Autonomous inspection robots provide significant value to off- concentration of flammable and toxic gasses to enable early
shore operations by performing inspection tasks autonomously, operator action.
R
emote operations is a big area for Oceaneering, with estab- Resident robotic systems, such as Oceaneering’s Liberty E-ROV,
lished facilities for remote operations in Norway, Aberdeen reduce the need for support vessels and offshore personnel,
and along the Gulf of Mexico (GoM). Oceaneering has carried out resulting in cost savings and reduced carbon emissions, he added.
remote commissioning, remote pipeline pigging, remote survey “In the asset inspection and integrity management space, the
and rig positioning, and remote inspections. ability to collect data with drones, quadbots and sensors (for
Earl Childress, Oceaneering’s senior vice president and chief image, rotating information, gas, temperature, material deterio-
commercial officer, shared insights with Offshore about the evo- ration) is improving with great speed,” Childress said, offering
lution of remote operations, the disadvantages and challenges another example of a notable technology advancement. “These
of remote ops, remote commissioning, R&D, automation capa- things, combined with improvements in software and the use of
bilities, offshore wind remote ops, and the state of the offshore artificial intelligence [AI] and machine learning to process data,
energy industry. are delivering impressive results, such as the integration of new
“Remote operations are continuously evolving to address chal- technologies tested onshore for subsea like stress concentration
lenges in the offshore energy industry by increasing efficiency, tomography in ROVs.
reducing costs, minimizing risks and lowering the environmental
impact of operations,” he said. “Technological advancements play Challenges
a crucial role in these improvements. Some notable recent advanc- While there are numerous advantages of remote operations for
es include improved connectivity and communication, such as offshore oil and gas projects, there are also some challenges that
high-speed networks (4G LTE and satellite connections), which offshore oil and gas operators face.
have enabled better communication between onshore and off- Childress listed latency and network reliability being one of the
shore personnel, allowing for smoother remote piloting and real- disadvantages. “Remote operations depend on reliable and low-la-
time collaboration.” tency communication networks. In areas with poor connectivi-
ty or high latency, remote operations
can face difficulties,” he explained.
“Oceaneering addresses this chal-
lenge by working with operators to
provide the required communication
networks, using LTE, geosynchronous
satellites or low earth orbit satellites, to
ensure reliable connectivity.”
He also listed IT security as a
challenge. “Secure communication
between onshore and offshore per-
sonnel is crucial to protect sensitive
data and maintain operational integ-
rity,” he said. “Oceaneering has devel-
oped robust IT security measures and
fail-safe systems to overcome poten-
tial cybersecurity threats and maintain
secure communication channels.”
Lastly, Childress said a resistance
The illustration showcases Oceaneering’s remote operations capabilities. COURTESY OCEANEERING to change can be another setback.
“Traditional offshore operations might be hesitant to adopt remote is a significant challenge,” he said. “Solutions involve staying
piloting due to concerns about reliability, safety and operation- updated on the latest regulatory updates, collaborating with local
al efficiency,” he said. “Oceaneering works to build confidence in authorities and implementing technology that adheres to region-
its remote piloting capabilities by showcasing our extensive track al requirements.”
record, redundancies and offshore control measures.” Additionally, offshore oil and gas operations in regions like the
Offshore oil and gas operators face a variety of remote opera- Arctic, the North Sea and the GoM face extreme weather con-
tions challenges that can vary by region and environment. Accord- ditions, which can hinder remote operations. “Solutions include
ing to Childress, some of the most common challenges include developing specialized equipment and tools designed to with-
infrastructure limitations, regulatory compliance and harsh envi- stand these conditions, implementing real-time monitoring sys-
ronments, and other issues may include integration with existing tems and using advanced analytics to optimize operations and
methodologies and adoption of new techniques. minimize downtime,” Childress said.
“Today, the crews conducting remote operations have prior
experience working in a physical offshore environment. In the Remote commissioning ROV
future, we may see crews that have never been offshore or only The company’s Liberty E-ROV resident vehicle has performed
have limited experience,” he suggested. “This could introduce a numerous subsea production systems commissioning tasks as
future operational risk where the crews become more disconnect- part of its regular operations.
ed from the operations. Therefore, new training programs will be “Liberty performs commissioning by remote operations without
needed to address the adoption of new technology and the new needing the installation vessel to stay on station for the full com-
way of working.” missioning operation,” Childress explained. “Liberty has its own
Regarding infrastructure limitations, remote operations requirebattery pack, subsea garage and communication buoy allowing
reliable communication networks, which may be limited in cer- it to stay subsea for longer without support.”
tain areas. “Solutions include investing in communication infra- It also helps with decarbonization strategies. A conventional
structure, such as satellites and subsea communication cables, to ROV will emit 644 metric ton of CO2 on an average 14-day inspec-
ensure stable connectivity regardless of location,” Childress said.
tion, maintenance and repair campaign, but the Liberty E-ROV by
As for regulatory compliance, different regions have specif- contrast will emit 178 metric ton of CO2 over the same time period,
ic regulatory requirements for offshore operations, including saving approximately 466 metric ton of CO2.
remote operations. “Ensuring compliance with these regulations As of April 20, the Liberty E-ROV has completed 163 missions
and almost 14,000 operational hours. It has
eliminated 10,000 support vessel hours or
roughly 400 vessel days, thereby eliminating
19,000 tons of CO2 emissions by eliminating the
need for the support vessel to stay on station
while the ROV works. By bringing workers back
to shore, Oceaneering’s remote operations
have eliminated 240 personnel crew changes
(12-hour shifts over 14-day trips).
Liberty also assists with decommissioning
tasks, and the resident vehicle recently con-
ducted a remote subsea pipeline isolation for
a major North Sea operator.
“Traditional pipeline isolation programs call
for an onsite support vessel for most of the
work,” Childress said. “However, Liberty does
not require one to stay on station. For this oper-
ation, a remotely controlled high-pressure, pig-
gable isolation tool was selected, which allows
pipeline isolation without requiring the system
to be fully evacuated. Liberty tracked and mon-
itored the pigging tool’s position as it navigat-
ed the pipeline.”
Oceaneering has an onshore remote operations center in Stavanger, Norway. Operations were monitored from an
COURTESY OCEANEERING Oceaneering onshore remote operation center
S
ubsea inspection operations are an ed on a trial project where an uncharted
intricate task that have historical- flooded quarry was explored for the first
ly required specialized knowledge and time during the Canadian winter. A Video-
complex technology. ROVs are a critical Ray Defender ROV was outfitted with the
tool for underwater exploration, inspec- vision system and deployed through a hole
tion and maintenance, but their effective- cut in the ice. The 4K video stream enabled
ness is driven by the quality of their vision effective piloting to identify a target, while The software interface shows 3D model
systems. Current ROV cameras prioritize the instantaneous 3D point cloud data was and stills images captured by Voyis
vehicle piloting and situational awareness, leveraged to evaluate data quality, cover- Discovery Vision System in real time.
COURTESY VOYIS
which are the most immediate needs of age and to maintain a consistent target
the operators. However, when both pilot- range using the added depth perception.
ing and inspection confidence can be A complete 3D reconstruction was quick-
significantly enhanced with 3D informa- ly generated using a selected segment of
tion, the industry should seek to adopt the dataset, attaining a comprehensive set
new approaches. of qualitative and quantitative visual data
Voyis, a company specializing in under- on the subsea asset—crisp video, high-res-
water optical imaging and 3D modeling, olution stills images and an accurate 3D
has advanced ROV vision systems with model. This delivered a complete under-
new computer vision technology. The goal standing of the structure and an assess-
was to create a vision platform that could ment of its condition.
capture both low-latency enhanced video The system was easily integrated using
for piloting while simultaneously captur- the vehicle’s existing power and ethernet
ing high-quality stills images for real- infrastructure, rapidly deploying this new This 3D model was generated by Voyis
time 3D modeling. The company sought a capability on the small platform. The Nova Discovery Stereo. COURTESY VOYIS
solution that could generate incredible 3D Mini lights provided high-intensity, uniform
reconstructions in real time without spe- lighting that drastically improved the qual- operations, a capability available for small
cialized technicians or expensive third-par- ity and clarity of the images compared to platforms using the compact 300-m Dis-
ty processing. the standard piloting camera. In a single covery Camera and on large work class
By leveraging edge computing, Voyis’ day, the Voyis team was able to effectively ROVs with the 4,000-m Discovery Stereo.
Discovery Vision System streams both integrate and operationalize the Discovery By employing edge computing to cap-
crisp 4K piloting video and 3D point cloud in a new environment to acquire an accu- ture high-quality stills images in tandem
data for complete situational awareness, rate 3D reconstruction of a subsea asset. with low-latency video, it achieves a vision
addressing the compromise between The success of the Discovery Vision system without comprise. It is now pos-
piloting cameras and inspection camer- System highlights its potential to revo- sible for every subsea vehicle to see the
as. Piloting cameras prioritize low-latency lutionize subsea inspections and ROV depths like the surface is seen. ●
T
he ocean covers 71% of the Earth’s to enable advanced subsea work.
surface and intersects nearly all daily toolKITT is predicated on the vehi-
activities, such as food, energy and trans- cle’s ability to make decisions about the
portation. It is a $3 trillion economy that environment from onboard sensors. It is
few people think about, much less consid- self-improving, meaning its ability to solve
er its impact on daily lives and the future. problems and complete tasks becomes
Legacy practices in the offshore indus- more efficient and precise over time.
try have remained largely unchanged Therefore, AI-powered robots can sub-
since their inception more than 50 years stantially improve the outlook of offshore
ago. This inertia has resulted in wide- operations compared to legacy methods.
spread operational inefficiencies, indus-
try stagnation and climate degradation. Reducing emissions
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the power AI plays a crucial role in streamlining off-
to radically change that reality by stream- shore activities, which improves oper-
Aquanaut underwater robot runs solely
lining operations, enhancing productivity, ational efficiencies and lowers costs as
on electric power, and Nauticus Robotics
and protecting not only human crews but well as drastically minimizes environ- says it is the first subsea robot that is just
the future of the ocean environment itself. mental impact. as versatile as it is sustainable. COURTESY
Nauticus Robotics, a developer of auton- Common legacy solutions require up NAUTICUS ROBOTICS
omous robots using AI for data collection to $100,000 per day or more to operate
and intervention services for the ocean and often need large crews to do so, yet Safety
economies, believes AI’s benefits in off- they’re riddled with operational ineffi- The efficiencies created by AI innovations
shore work has potential to continue dis- ciencies. In contrast, software-enabled significantly increase safety. From 2012-
rupting an antiquated industry for the solutions like toolKITT, when paired with 2020, the US Bureau of Safety and Environ-
betterment of the oceans. intelligent all-electric robots, have the mental Enforcement collected data from
power to integrate seamlessly into work- 4,474 offshore incidents, resulting in 1,654
Advancing subsea work flows to accomplish more with less. A injuries and 23 deaths. Autonomous robots
Historically, subsea work involved a ship single pair of intelligent robots can per- allow for a future with significantly less
steaming out and dropping a heavy ROV form complicated subsea tasks auton- risk involved in completing a job because
in the water connected by thousands of omously, with more precision and in fewer people will be needed on site.
feet of cumbersome umbilical back to the significantly less time.
ship. This expensive, manual technique Incumbent methods endanger the Conclusion
has gone largely untouched for decades, planet by emitting up to 70 mt of CO2 into AI has the potential to create a future where
while topside the robotics revolution has the atmosphere daily, which is the equiva- more autonomous and intelligent robots
been exploding. lent of 5,000 cars on the road. When multi- are used to reduce environmental impact
Nauticus leverages and develops plied by the number of vessels doing work and eliminate human exposure to hazards
approaches to support subsea applications, in the ocean, its impact is huge. Nauticus’ while improving the offshore industry in
with a specific focus on enabling opera- AI-powered, all-electric technology can every way possible. Nauticus is working to
tor-supervised, autonomous inspection and reduce the estimated CO2 footprint of off- make that opportunity a reality. ●
manipulation tasks. These advancements shore vessels by more than 90% and lower
start with a software-enabled solution value stream costs by 50%. Dr. JD Yamokoski is Nauticus Robotics’ CTO.
M
any oil and gas majors are now increasingly moving towards survey spread in international waters with zero recordable down-
options that enable them to reduce vessel days and therefore time and was consistently ahead of schedule in the client’s fleet,
their carbon footprint, as well as eliminating risks to personnel. remotely providing GVI/SURF inspections, as-laid/left surveys,
C-Innovation (C-I), owner and operator of Schilling Robotics valve operations, flowline/umbilical surveys, mooring line surveys,
ROV systems, provides a range of specialized remote diagnostic BOEM surveys, buoy placement and recovery operations, and USBL
and mission-planning software as well as augmented reality and calibration/validations.
mid-water StationKeep systems. Its inspection class, heavy-duty The Guyanese project was the precursor that set up the com-
150-HP and ultra-heavy-duty 200-HP ROVs are used to conduct pany’s success near its home in the Gulf of Mexico.
a wide range of inspection type work.
In the past two years, drawing upon its submarine ROV techno- Recent projects
logical capabilities that offer clients a system-wide platform, C-I C-I has performed several remote surveying operations over the
has completed more than 30 hull inspections in the Gulf of Mexico, past year. For example, in January 2022, C-I began remote opera-
Alaska, Atlantic Ocean and Brazil. These inspection services vary tions on Juan C , including BOEM inspections, mooring line inspec-
in operational tasks and include hull inspections, UWILDS, bull- tions, and USBL calibration/validations.
seye and riser inspections for drill support, and pipeline surveys. During summer 2022, C-I enabled simulation operations on
In addition to being equipped with HD video, C-I’s ROVs inte- the Island Venture vessel, and the company successfully enabled
grate tooling due to their modular system and device configura- remote access to the platform to view the Island Venture ROVs.
tion software. Examples of tooling capabilities for inspection work Then, in August 2022, C-I began remote operations on the
include camera booms, 3D modeling, UT/CP monitoring systems, C-Constructor vessel, which included jumper ops, mooring line
mux integration, lasers and subsea cleaning tools. inspections, tree/well installations and USBL calibration/validation.
At year-end 2022, C-I began remote operation with GIS, and this
Offshore Guyana case study included remote navigation for geophysical work in Mexican waters.
C-I’s fully remote operations have been available since the com- More recently, in February 2023, C-I began remote operations
pany first entered the remote survey industry in April 2020 at the on Laney. The client required remote viewing at the base in Prov-
height of the COVID-19 pandemic. idence, Rhode Island. The company set up a live working system
C-I’s goal was to provide its client with offshore services while involving plough operations to be viewed remotely.
operating safely from the company’s headquarters in Mandeville,
Surveying vessels
C-I has five vessels that are actively involved in remote survey
operations, which increases safety and reduces greenhouse-gas
emissions to the environment. Operating out of the company’s
remote operations center (ROC) at C-I’s headquarters, its remote
surveyor eliminates the risk for potential personal injury while
onboard the vessel and cuts down on travel hazards to and from
a vessel or heliport.
By placing an experienced remote surveyor on duty at the ROC
with the ability to log in to any vessel in the fleet, troubleshoot-
ing any potential problems has become a much more manage-
able process. ●
C-Innovation performs an underwater plet inspection. COURTESY
C-INNOVATION Tim Bingham is survey manager with C-Innovation.
Affordable offshore
well monitoring lowers
P&A costs
Digital innovations are driving adoption of
satellite-powered monitoring
THIERRY ZOIS, Hiber
E
very well’s life has a hard stop, but the plug and abandon-
ment (P&A) process can feel never-ending. The P&A proce-
dure itself costs multiple $100,000s, compounded by years of site Today’s smart satellite-powered technology can monitor remote
wellhead data, enable better abandonment strategies and
visit costs (in terms of teams, transportation and pure opportuni-
eliminate surprises. COURTESY HIBER
ty cost). Can the latest satellite technology make well abandon-
ment less painful? Shell had already calculated the costs of sending teams of engi-
Until recently, connecting wells to satellites was too expen- neers in helicopters or boats to manually collect data for 12 months
sive to be a practical solution for monitoring abandoned wells. Its or more. The company wondered whether this new satellite tech-
power requirements made it impractical for remote applications, nology could reliably and cost-effectively monitor two platforms.
and networking limitations, which limited the distance between Hiber’s team worked with Shell on a pilot using the HiberHilo oil
wellhead sensors and the satellite gateway, added to the hard- and gas technology to validate its predictions. HiberHilo is a turn-
ware costs. However, the arrival of Internet of Things, along with key well and pipeline monitoring tool that includes sensors, soft-
three major technical innovations, has redefined what is possible ware, satellite connectivity and continued service.
(and affordable) with remote well monitoring: In April 2021, Shell’s crew installed pressure sensors on annuli
• Long-range networks: Developments in long-range networks that required close monitoring and network gateways to facilitate
have redefined the economics of satellite monitoring. It provides wireless satellite communication. The entire installation of the solu-
a terrestrial coverage radius of 10 km, which means numerous tion took less than three hours, with the sensors connected to the
wellhead sensors can share a single satellite gateway, reducing satellites within 15 minutes. It was so fast that the Shell engineers
the complexity and cost of networking hardware. estimated they could have performed another 15 installations that
• Bite-size data packets: Traditional 24/7 data-gathering moni- same day. Plus, when the team started using HiberHilo, 99.8% of the
toring solutions have been supplanted by a new generation data collected were logged in Shell’s monitoring system.
of solutions that employ intelligent data gathering and trans- Instead of going offshore monthly to check for possible pressure
mission. Instead of beaming data continuously (which is both buildups, Shell’s technical team can now continually monitor these
unnecessary and expensive), today’s smart sensors sample key abandoned wells and implement a comprehensive P&A strategy.
data every few minutes, then transmit it each hour. While users This reduction in trips reduced the cost of the decommissioning
will not receive real-time data, they will get regular updates of campaign by an estimated €120,000 ($132,516), while at the same
mission-critical information at an affordable price. time improving the integrity of the decommissioning plan.
• Power optimization: Small, efficient data transmissions have Furthermore, this approach lowered the probability of remedial
enabled improved power optimization. Instead of being a pow- work and reduced rig time, unlocking another potential €300,000
er-hungry monster, new satellite well-monitoring tools use ($331,290) in savings. Importantly, the solution also improved crew
much less energy, which translates into savings for operators. safety and reduced the environmental impact of platform visits.
At the end of the project, once the P&A campaign has completed,
Case study the sensors and gateways can be easily transferred to the next
Today’s smart satellite-powered technology makes it easy to tap platform on a rolling schedule.
into remote wellhead data, plan better abandonment strategies In conclusion, this resulted in a cost reduction and increased
and eliminate surprises. To see it in action, look to the North Sea, sustainability. ●
where Shell has a portfolio of old wells dating back to the ’60s
and ’70s, many of which are in the process of being abandoned. Thierry Zois is Hiber’s chief commercial officer, based in the Netherlands.
I
n the energy sector, the acquisition and processing of data asso-
ciated with operations has traditionally involved the mobiliza-
tion of personnel and equipment to offshore locations around the
globe. However, with the need to minimize carbon footprint and
costs, which are particularly important considerations for clean
energy stakeholders, operators are looking for innovative ways to
develop and operate assets across the renewable energy, oil and
gas, and nearshore construction industries. A remote operation center conducts monitoring for an uncrewed
Acteon, a marine energy and infrastructure services company, survey vessel. COURTESY UTEC / ACTEON
reviews the impact of a remote technology that can be deployed
to reduce survey costs and increase project efficiency. Within a other travel costs while retaining access to highly skilled per-
project life cycle, the overall operational schedule can be improved sonnel when required. The carbon footprint of operations can
by optimizing the individual survey tasks and conducting some be reduced and improved safety is realized from a reduced off-
of those activities remotely. From site characterization through shore headcount. Because data-processing personnel are only
to decommissioning, accurate survey data enable the operator paid for the time they work on the data, and not their mobiliza-
to plan, mitigate potential challenges and choose the optimal tion and standby time, cost savings are generated that can be
design solution. passed on to clients.
One piece of technology used by Acteon to enhance overall
project efficiency is the communications hub (comms hub) devel- Case study
oped by UTEC, a geo-services brand in Acteon’s Data and Robot- Havfram was required to perform a decommissioning project in
ics division. It provides the communications security and network Mauritania that involved the removal and disposal of subsea infra-
resilience required to deliver all types of remote services using any structure. The survey services included post-decommissioning
available internet connection. While bringing data ashore in real multibeam echo sounder (MBES) surveys carried out by an ROV.
time, the comms hub checks the characteristics of each bonded A UTEC comms hub installed on the Havfram vessel Island
link for error rate, packet loss, jitter and latency to determine which Victory provided automated file transfer functionality, facilitating
way a particular packet should be dispatched. By adapting rapidly remote data processing. Without requiring additional bandwidth,
to network conditions found offshore, where the characteristics the comms hub automatically transferred the MBES data with
of satellite links change frequently, the comms hub enables net- backscatter intensity measurement enabled.
work acceleration, bringing data ashore securely and efficiently.
The comms hub can provide live H.265 video streams from a Conclusion
remotely operated vehicle (ROV) or any camera on board a vessel, By facilitating remote services, Acteon is bringing ashore many
to multiple onshore and offshore locations without the need to of the tasks traditionally conducted offshore, achieving signifi-
mobilize any additional equipment or personnel. The comms hub cant project time and cost savings. Simultaneously, risk expo-
facilitates remote operation of online navigation software and sure and carbon emissions associated with offshore mobilizations
remote technical support by providing direct remote access to are reduced.
the offshore survey network. Additionally, it enables remote data Acteon is continuing to invest in remote capabilities to support
processing via automated file transfer in close to real time. operators, particularly in the offshore wind sector. ●
As the remote technology can reduce personnel on board by
up to 30% by bringing tasks onshore, it reduces aviation and Torsten Marten is a lead surveyor with UTEC.
digital transformation journey James Fisher AIS’s rollout of its R2S digital twin technolo-
gy is one example of how Nigeria is benefitting from a differ-
ADESHINA ADEBUSUYI, James Fisher AIS ent approach through collaborative partnerships and offering
a compelling alternative to previous digital transformation
T
he digital transformation in Africa is advancing in leaps and attempts, while also building mutual trust and understanding.
bounds, with Nigeria leading the charge as home to the most The key to putting theory into action is establishing a culture
technology hubs across the continent. shift away from the traditional business model that relies on
Despite this technology spike, Nigeria’s energy industry is lag- quickfire sales. The focus must instead be on establishing long-
ging behind its global peers putting its ambition to be a gas-pow- term partnerships with oil and gas companies to jointly mitigate
ered economy by 2030 at risk. their valuable concerns through consultative engagements.
Nigeria’s oil and gas potential could unlock economic prosper- With the investment almost equal for both partners, Nige-
ity and lift millions out of energy poverty. Previously hampered rian oil and gas companies can have renewed confidence
by a lack of oil and gas infrastructure, progress is finally being in adopting emerging technologies such as data analyt-
made in Nigeria following former President Buhari’s “Decade ics, digital twin and predictive maintenance. This approach
of Gas Initiative,” alongside the long-awaited reforms delivered lends itself to being scalable and adaptable. Those hesitant
through the Petroleum Industry Act. to give digital transformation another try can start with a
Despite planned projects, such as the Dangote refinery and small amount of change and then scale that change up on
several LNG plants, Nigeria’s checkered history with the use of the back of success.
digital technology within the offshore oil and gas industry could Those companies that have taken the leap toward adopt-
jeopardize this potential success story with many companies ing digital twins can now present 2D data, visual data and
becoming disillusioned by digital transformation. real-time data in a real-world context, allowing teams to plan
better and swiftly make important operational decisions. Data
Pitfall of digital distrust that were once siloed, outdated and disconnected has become
Most oil and gas decision makers were sold a vision of dig- useful, robust and accurate, providing visibility to the remot-
ital transformation; however, these purchases not only failed est of assets.
to improve output, but also did not solve the challenges they
were bought to resolve. It has become an all-too-common pit- Knowledge transfer
fall, engineered by unscrupulous sales teams, leading to dis- Finally, creating opportunities for knowledge transfer means
trust and hesitance in adopting new innovations that would that Africa’s oil and gas industry can confidently champion its
have a positive impact. digital transformation. Making this vision a reality, James Fisher
While industry leaders elsewhere are benefiting from the AIS is delivering a training school in Angola that equips new
latest innovations in digital twins, data analytics and remote industry recruits with the digital skills needed to operate oil and
maintenance, many Nigerian workers are working from incom- gas assets efficiently. It also opened headquarters in Lagos,
plete plans and Excel spreadsheets. They waste lots of time giving companies direct access to experts that understand the
looking for data siloed across several systems—or worse, not region’s specific needs and its digital heritage.
captured at all, residing solely in colleagues’ memories. Overcoming the gaps in digital transformation through col-
laborative partnerships will be paramount if Nigeria is to fully
Overcoming digital disillusionment benefit from the forthcoming boom in oil and gas infrastruc-
The challenge of balancing the volatility of oil price with main- ture and be considered as an industry heavyweight on the
taining margins means that digital transformation is often over- world stage. ●
looked. Without it, Nigeria’s domestic supply and exports may
rise, and economic prosperity will not be unlocked to the full- Adeshina Adebusuyi is regional business development manager with
James Fisher AIS.
est potential. To mend the rift created by digital disillusionment,
AI tools improving
HSE, reducing
unplanned downtime
COURTESY SPARKCOGNITION
AI is unequivocally transforming
offshore operations
JASON CHADEE, SparkCognition
W
ork on an offshore rig is physically demanding, unpredictable
and potentially dangerous. While pay and benefits are excellent, days for around-the-clock surveillance for machine monitoring,
seamen and offshore workers perform duties within proximity to antipiracy deterrents and workplace safety. CCTVs alone collect
highly combustible materials while handling massive cranes, hoist- and store visual data but are only effective with dedicated staff
ing systems, pumps, engines and other heavy equipment on unsta- monitoring 24/7, a practical impossibility given inevitable oper-
ble vessels and slippery decks, and often in challenging weather. ator fatigue. Even when information is successfully collected, it
Oil rig incident and death reports are moving targets. It is widely only provides retrospective evidence.
acknowledged that the offshore oil and gas industry is one of the Offshore extraction companies can configure and deploy vision-
most dangerous in the world, yet there is no reliable system for based applications, leveraging existing infrastructure, using a low-
tracking and reporting injuries and fatalities. What is definitive is code/no-code scalable AI-enabled computer vision program.
the dangers associated with the job. When coupled with a library of pre-existing use cases for safety
Between 2008 and 2017, there were more than 1,500 deaths and security, computers and systems can capture and interpret
on oil rigs in the US. In its 2021 safety report, the International meaningful information from image and video data and respond
Association of Oil and Gas Producers showed an increase in the accordingly in real time, transforming them into proactive analyt-
number of deaths in the industry overall, from 14 in 2020 to 20 in ical assets that provide actionable insights and automated alerts
2021. The total injury rate was 0.77 in 2021, a 10% increase from to manage risks, processes and workforce safety.
the year prior and 580 lost workdays. A 2021 private investigation Platform operators can flag HSE compliance failures or insuffi-
found that the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, cient personal protection equipment, identify persons in distress,
the government agency created to improve safety and enforce and spot potential damage to inventory and impending accidents,
environmental regulations in the offshore oil and gas industry, which results in cost savings, improved reputation and increased
underreports the number of offshore worker deaths due to incon- overall safety in daily operations.
sistent or missing data or loopholes that allow some fatalities to AI modeling can also improve rig or platform availability at
go unreported. scale, creating financial incentives while improving safety for engi-
In 1983 the Occupational Safety and Health Administration neers and operators. When deployed onshore in a remote control
(OSHA) and the US Coast Guard entered into an agreement giving center, it provides alerts, alarms and can trigger automated proto-
OSHA statutory authority to promulgate regulations that address cols increasing overall operational visibility. When fully deployed
working conditions on offshore drilling platforms. OSHA maintains across an entire fleet of offshore rigs or platforms, AI modeling
that the safety of oil rig workers is a leading priority and has enacted can significantly impact the economics of a business.
measures to mitigate safety and health hazards and dangerous con- AI is unequivocally transforming offshore operations. It
ditions, but reactionary workplace safety initiatives are insufficient. improves health and safety management initiatives, helps mini-
mize unplanned downtime and production impacting events, pro-
Benefits of AI actively manages periodic maintenance and reduces costs, helps
With the industry’s commitment to safety at its strongest, visual reduce the carbon footprint, maximizes the life of assets and can
artificial intelligence (AI) is being deployed as a proactive approach offer advanced cyber threat detection. ●
and technological disruptor in limiting injuries and loss of life on
offshore installations. Jason Chadee is a global energy sales executive with 25 years of experience in
solving complex operational problems with software solutions for oil and gas, utilities,
The is a visual AI technology available today that utilizes the
and renewables markets.
closed-circuit televisions (CCTVs) that are ubiquitous on rigs these
T
he FPSO fleet is in the midst of a generational shift in the tech-
nology available to support offshore operations. For 50 years,
maintenance management and condition evaluation have been
a labor-intensive, analog exercise. Today, a new technology-driv-
COURTESY ABS
en agenda is enhancing a safety-first approach with the adop-
tion of tools and systems that improve safety, performance and
operating costs.
Following the launch of the recent ABS “Guide for Autonomous The goal-based framework covers interactions with relevant stake-
and Remote-control Functions,” which sets out a goal-based holders such as port authorities and other vessels. It uses a risk-
framework for the implementation of these technologies on ves- based approach to determine the requirements for the assessment
sels and offshore units, a new project is underway to advance and implementation of autonomous and remote control functions.
safety performances of a global FPSO fleet. Autonomous functions are those in which machines perform
An FPSO operator has proposed to add remote control function- each of the four steps in the operational decision loop (i.e., moni-
ality to their newly installed FPSO, which is under ABS class. The toring, analysis, decision and action), without the need for human
FPSO is currently located offshore in a new and rapidly develop- intervention to perform tasks and achieve the system mission.
ing area that has challenges with local resources and transporta- Autonomous functions do not follow predefined routines and oper-
tion infrastructure. The proposed plan is to add a remote control ational scenarios. They have the ability to execute the most appro-
center called an Integrated Operation Center (IOC) located at a priate actions based on their programming, assigned mission and
nearby shore-based facility to add remote control functionality. tasks, operational environment and the system status.
The FPSO will be connected to the IOC via fiber-optic cables with Remote control functions are an approach whereby the
redundant capability. A small crew would also remain on the unit system and operation being monitored is controlled remotely by
to serve as oversight. This initiative by the FPSO operator is to add a human operator who is physically located elsewhere other than
remote functionality to all topside process-related functions and on board a marine vessel or offshore unit where the operations
large equipment packages such as turbines, compressor, gener- take place. There is a minimal crew on board for oversight and
ators, etc. However, the work scope does not presently include emergency operations.
plans to control the typical marine systems or marine operations The FPSO project is just one of the many growing examples
such as stores transfer, station keeping and bunkering via the IOC. in which the offshore industry is rethinking the methods to con-
The project will be executed in three phases. Phase 1 will use duct asset inspections, collect and evaluate condition data, reduce
remote monitoring to verify all systems are working as they should costs and increase safety, while ensuring reliability. ABS experts
and that there are no major problems. In Phase 2, the operator can also explore with their clients the latest artificial intelligence
will gradually add remote functionality for selected modules and tools used to aid in corrosion detection and measurement and the
equipment packages. In Phase 3, remote functionality to all top- potential of an accurate digital condition model, or digital twin, to
side modules, system and equipment packages will be imple- support modern risk-based inspection techniques.
mented. The scope covers both hardware and software digital For this project, ABS will dedicate locally assigned survey teams
architecture assessments and cybersecurity risk assessments and other ABS experts. ABS surveyors will perform the duties
and management system. required for classification surveys, and a training program is being
The work is based on ABS’ recent guidance and cross-indus- implemented for the client’s technical teams to ensure the techni-
try collaboration on remote control and autonomous notations. cal staff remain qualified and to ensure the work is done in a safe
Development of this guidance was informed by experiences with and consistent manner. ●
rocket launching and recovery vessels as well as remote control
and autonomous tug projects in Europe, Asia and the Americas. Matt Tremblay is ABS vice president, Global Offshore.
Sales Offices
Endeavor Business Media Petroleum Group
757 N. Eldridge Pkwy 8th Floor, Suite D Houston, TX 77079
?
Tel: +1 713 963 6206 Fax: +1 713 963 6228
October/November 2020
2305_06OFF_C1-C4.indd 3 1
2304OFF_House_OWES.indd 5/22/23
2/26/23 8:46
7:56 AM
PM
Dril-Quip® XPak® De
Expandable Liner Hanger
Improve your subsea well construction by replacing
supplemental adapters with a true liner hanger.
XPak® De enables 18” and 16” liners to be deployed and set as a true
liner hanger; anywhere within the 22” casing string and without the
need for contingency target joints or pre-installed adapters.
the power of
TM
© 2023 Dril-Quip, Inc. All rights reserved. | dril-quip.com #ThePowerOfE #GreenByDesign #OurTreesAreGreener
2305_06OFF_C1-C4.indd
2306OFF_DrilQuip.indd 1 4 5/22/23
5/15/23 8:46
2:15 AM
PM
The U.S.
Gulf of Mexico
A STRATEGIC
NATIONAL ENERGY
ASSET AND ENERGY
INNOVATION HUB
PARTNER PROFILES
73 EXMAR Offshore
74 bp
75 MSRC
76 Quality Companies
77 Oceaneering
NOIA || THE
NOIA THE U.S.
U.S. GULF
GULF OF
OF MEXICO
MEXICO 3
For the foreseeable future, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico offshore energy sector will
play an integral role in shaping an energy system that promotes the provision
of affordable and reliable energy while simultaneously continuing to reduce
the environmental and emissions footprint of development and distribution.
Importantly, for the coming decades, oil and gas supplies will remain a vital
Image 1020383430 © FrankRamspott | gettyimages.com
energy source for Americans and our allies around the globe1.
1. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/
Oil and gas fill the fuel tanks of passenger vehicles and airplanes. They are
transformed into the essential building blocks of smartphones, clothing, and
medical equipment. They are in many products we use every day that underpin the
conveniences of modern life.
Natural gas is recognized as a key energy source for providing electricity, heating,
cooling, and clean cooking. More than 750 million people around the globe do
not have access to electricity, which leaves entire communities at a severe and
fundamental disadvantage. According to the World Health Organization (WHO),
“Access to energy is critical when it comes to the functionality of health-care
facilities and the quality, accessibility and reliability of health services delivered.
Electricity is necessary for the operation of critically needed medical devices such
as vaccine refrigeration, surgical emergency, laboratory and diagnostic equipment,
as well as for the operation of basic amenities such as lighting, cooling, ventilation
and communications.”2
Globally, 2.6 billion people do not have the means for clean cooking and must
Photo 1317214769 © curraheeshutter | gettyimages.com
use solid fuels such as wood, crop wastes, charcoal, and dung in open fires and
inefficient stoves. The WHO attributes 3.8 million premature deaths each year to
indoor air pollution caused by the fumes and soot generated by inefficient and
dirty cooking.
2. https://www.who.int/activities/accelerating-access-to-electricy-in-health-care-facilities
Energy insecurity has adverse consequences on both physical and mental health.
Millions of Americans are faced with the “heat or eat” dilemma, regularly having to
choose between paying utility bills and paying for food4.
All forms of energy, including oil and gas, wind, solar, nuclear, geothermal, and emerging
forms of energy such as hydrogen, can play a role in raising the standard of living and
lifting communities out of poverty. The offshore energy sector is particularly well
poised to deliver reliable, abundant, and affordable energy of many types for society.
Traditionally recognized as a key producer of oil and gas, the offshore sector has
emerged as a leader in offshore wind, is spearheading the deployment of carbon
capture and storage technologies, and is playing a vital role in developing innovative
hydrogen technologies.
Currently, global oil consumption is approximately 100 million barrels per day. Various
scenarios forecast global oil consumption volumes through 2050 and beyond, and
nearly all of them predict substantial oil production will be necessary through 2050. The
question is, “Where should that oil come from?”
Oil produced from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico has a carbon intensity one-half that of other
producing regions.5 The technologies used in deepwater production – which represents
92 percent of the oil produced in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico – place this region among
the lowest carbon intensity oil-producing regions in the world6. Policies that restrict
domestic offshore development require imports to make up the shortfall, and that
supplemental production comes from higher-emitting operations in other countries.
Foreign providers generally employ less environmentally conscientious production
3. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2020/ph240/radzyminski2/
4. S. Jessel, S. Sawyer, and D. Hernández, “Energy, Poverty, and Health in Climate Change: A Comprehensive Review of an
Emerging Literature,” Front. Public Health 7, 357 (2019).
5. Motiwala, and Ismail, “Statistical Study of Carbon Intensities in the GOM and PB,” ChemRxiv, April 13, 2020.
6. https://www.woodmac.com/news/the-challenge-of-negative-emissions/
methods, which when combined with the added emissions from transporting oil
over great distances by tanker, increases the amount of carbon released into the
atmosphere rather than decreasing it.
The better choice is to institute government policies that promote cleaner and safer
domestic production, less reliance on higher-emitting foreign suppliers like Russia and
China, and the preservation of hundreds of thousands of American jobs.
On the other hand, restricting U.S. offshore energy development could eventually
lead to Americans of every walk of life having to contend with the issues Europe is
experiencing as a result of disrupted supply from Russia, including potential industrial
curtailment and families having to make difficult choices between heat and food.
7. https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/could-restricting-oil-production-in-the-us-gulf-of-mexico-lead-to-
carbon-leakage/
Oil and natural gas touch every part of our daily lives. Fundamentally, “Everything
that is fabricated, grown, operated or moved is made possible by hydrocarbons.”8
The U.S. Department of Energy states:
Oil and natural gas play an essential role in powering America’s vibrant
economy and fueling a remarkable quality of life in the United States.
Together, oil and natural gas provide more than two-thirds of the energy
Americans consume daily, and we will continue to rely on them in the
future. In addition to meeting our energy needs, oil and natural gas are
Photo 604033056 © curraheeshutter | gettyimages.com
integral to our standard of living in ways that are often not apparent.
Several key advances in technology enabled a dramatic increase in
domestic oil and natural gas production over the past 20 years. This
increased production provides energy security and economic benefits to
the entire country, and ongoing technology advances will help us to enjoy
those benefits into the future.
While perhaps less recognized, oil and natural gas also play critical roles in supplying
essential products and materials, increasing agricultural productivity, and supporting
the expansion of new energy sources.
Oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids are building blocks for a range of modern
materials used to produce life-changing prosthetics, energy-efficient homes, safer
cars that go farther on a gallon of gasoline, and hundreds more consumer products that
Americans use every day. Plastics and chemicals derived from oil and natural gas make
our food safer, our clothing more comfortable, our homes easier to care for, and our
daily lives more convenient.
Natural gas is also a key ingredient for chemical fertilizers, helping increase crop
production and yield per acre planted, and powering many important operations on the
farm like crop drying.9
According to the United Nations, access to affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy is
critical to achieving many international development goals, specifically, the eradication of
poverty through continued improvements in education, health, and access to water.10 Oil
and natural gas play a central role in eliminating poverty and raising the standard of living
for millions by serving as a key form of abundant and affordable energy.
High energy density makes oil an invaluable resource to global society. According to the
Brookings Institute:
Oil resources are not as extensively distributed worldwide as coal, but oil has
crucial advantages. Fuels produced from oil are nearly ideal for transportation.
They are energy-dense, averaging twice the energy content of coal, by weight.
But more importantly, they are liquid rather than solid, allowing the development
of the internal combustion engine that drives transportation today…
9. U.S. OIL AND NATURAL GAS: Providing Energy Security and Supporting Our Quality of Life, U.S. Department of Energy,
September 2020, p. 4.
10. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/goal-07/
HOUSEHOLD
Exterior paints, thermal isolation,
FUEL
heating oils, window frames,
Kerosene, heavy fuel oils, marine
kitchen surfaces, non-stick pans,
fuels, diesel, gasoline, jet fuel,
plastic surfaces, detergents, TV
heating oil, etc.
sets, dishwasher, faucet, trash
bags, mops etc.
MEDICAL CLOTHING
Pharmaceuticals, hoses, Outdoor clothing, clothing made
antiseptics, aspirin, hand out of polyethylene terephthalate
sanitiser, aesthetics, x-ray, (PET), artificial fiber, sweaters,
examination equipment, panty, rubber boots, running
pacemakers, crutches, shoes, shoe soles, shoe polish
wheelchair, bandages, etc. etc.
BEAUTY
ELECTRONICS Nail polish, make-up, facial
Cable coatings, computers, TV creams, perfumes, shampoo,
sets, tablets, headsets, cameras, soap, shaving cream, hair curlers,
mobile phones, photographic toothbrushes, toothpaste, hair
film, etc. coloring, deodorant, hairdryer,
etc.
AGRICULTURE
ACCESSORIES
Propane, lubricants, greases,
Sunglasses, carrier bags,
fungicides, fertilizers, pesticides,
synthetic leather, umbrellas,
herbicides, insecticides, irrigation
jewelry, luggage, etc.
piping, gloves, etc.
CONSTRUCTION SPORTS
Traffic cones, barrier tapes, Sports clothing, tennis balls,
asphalt, tarpaulins, paint, safety basketballs, footballs, surfboards,
glasses, water pipes, tools, safety cleats, bicycles, parachutes,
helmets, caulking, roofing roller-skate wheels, golf bags, golf
shingles, plywood adhesive, paint balls, helmets, lifesaving jackets,
rollers etc. fishing rods etc.
OFFICE TOYS
Printing inks, pens, computers, Pacifiers, frisbees, crayons,
glue, tape, etc. balloons, dolls, etc.
Industrial processes that need very high heat — such as the production of steel,
cement, and glass — pose another challenge. Steel blast furnaces operate at
about 1,100° C, and cement kilns operate at about 1,400° C. These very high
temperatures are hard to achieve without burning a fuel and are thus difficult to
power with electricity.11
The nascent offshore wind sector will be part of the energy transformation. Through
research, development, and demonstration projects, technology advances will enable
wind and other renewable energy sources to eventually provide pathways for overcoming
some of these challenges. While that inevitable progress is being made in the coming
decades, oil and natural gas will continue to account for a majority of our energy portfolio.
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), oil and natural gas
accounted for 68 percent of total U.S. energy consumption in 2021 [FIGURE 1].
In its Annual Energy Outlook 2022, the EIA predicts, “U.S. energy consumption will
increase over the next 30 years as population and economic growth outpace gains in
energy efficiency.” 12 Though the organization projects that renewable energy will be the
fastest-growing source of energy through 2050 and will make up more of the energy
mix, it contends that petroleum and liquid fuels will remain the most-consumed source
of energy. In fact, liquid fuels are expected to represent the largest fuel source in the
global energy system [FIGURE 2].
11. https://www.brookings.edu/essay/why-are-fossil-fuels-so-hard-to-quit/
12. https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/releases/press496.php
Wood 17%
Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review, Table 1.3 and 10.1
April 2022, preliminary data
Note: Sum of components may not equal 100% because of independent rounding.
FIGURE 2
Energy production by source AEO2022 Reference case
quadrillion British thermal units
2021
50
history projections
dry natural gas
40
30
crude oil and lease condensate
coal
10 natural gas plant liquids
nuclear
hydro
0
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Source: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/AEO2022_ChartLibrary_OverviewandDrivers.pdf
As for oil, the forecast for liquid fuel consumption is continuing growth at a near
constant pace through 2050: “As travel increases as the effects of the COVID-19
pandemic lessen, the majority of passenger and freight vehicles continue to be fueled
by liquid fuel-consuming internal combustion engines. Industrial use of petroleum and
other liquids, particularly for chemical feedstocks, also increases through the projection
period.” 13 [FIGURE 3]
Renewables are gaining ground as the world pursues an energy transition away from oil
and natural gas, but hydrocarbons continue to play a central role in the U.S. and global
energy systems and will continue to do so for several decades.
Our national energy needs clearly support a commitment to continued U.S. offshore
energy development. U.S. Gulf of Mexico offshore energy production is a key component
of a national energy strategy that will ensure Americans can continue to have access to
fundamental domestic energy that is produced safely, sustainably, and responsibly.
As with many other forms of energy development, oil and gas production is contingent
upon having acreage that can be explored, developed, and produced. Leasing is requisite
to securing the acreage to develop and produce supplies of oil and gas for the country.
Continued lease sales at regular intervals is required for declining production to be
replenished and production levels to be increased when there are spikes in demand.
Simply put, the more acreage that is available, the greater the potential for well-managed
energy production.14
The myth of idle leases has become a red herring in the public debate over federal oil
and gas leasing. Assertions about the “stockpiling” of leases represents a fundamental
misunderstanding of how the oil and gas industry operates under the offshore
leasing program.
13. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/consumption/sub-topic-01.php
14. It is not true, however, that more leasing necessarily leads to more environmental impacts. As noted herein, many leases will
not go into production, and for those that do, industry has continued to minimize the footprint necessary for production as it
continues to do more with less.
Oil and gas companies often must bid on leases around which there is significant
uncertainty. In other words, companies must cast a wide net when acquiring lease
blocks, then winnow through prospective blocks by means of additional exploration
and study – a process that can take years – before they can identify a commercially
viable discovery.
Legally competing at auction for rights to explore and develop offshore federal lands
and paying a bonus to acquire a federal offshore oil and gas mineral lease can be a
risky proposition. There is no guarantee that oil and gas resources are present in the
subsurface. Even with incredible advances in technology, there is an element of energy
production that is still speculative. Due to this risk, some leases are studied for quite
some time to determine if energy reserves exist or if they exist in sufficient quantities to
be produced economically and in compliance with regulatory standards. In other cases,
sites being considered for exploratory wells are going through a thorough and lengthy
regulatory approval process.
Given that a production well in the Gulf of Mexico can cost hundreds of millions of
dollars to develop, decision-makers must be judicious in deciding to develop a lease.
Oil and natural gas companies have every incentive to produce as much oil and gas
as possible as rapidly as they can. The decision about which blocks to develop is
predicated on a number of considerations.
■ Finding oil and gas is a prospective business, and not all leases contain commercially
viable amounts of hydrocarbons. In fact, most leased areas do not contain oil and
gas in commercial quantities. Companies need to invest in multiple lease blocks and
methodically assess them to identify and develop the blocks where commercially
viable finds are most likely.
■ A lease is only a rental agreement. When a company buys a lease, it’s tying up
significant (and finite) capital in the search for oil and natural gas. There is a
significant financial incentive for a company to recover its initial investment
by developing oil and gas resources in a timely manner, in other words, to
initiate production.
■ In addition to bidding potentially millions of dollars for each lease block, companies
pay rent to the federal government on non-producing leases. Annual rental rates can
cost hundreds of thousands of dollars per lease block.
■ Companies are required under government leasing regulations to develop a lease
expeditiously or return it to the federal government. Rental terms are established
in the Final Notice of Sale and typically range from 5 to 10 years, depending on
water depth. In general, leases that are not producing by the end of their term are
relinquished to the government, which can then re-lease them. The resources
invested by the company to acquire and keep the lease are lost if a lease is returned
to the government.
15. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R40645
Developing a lease block does not occur overnight. The timeline from lease sale to first
oil can take up to ten years. A typical project progression includes:
■ One year for preliminary geological investigation and selection of areas of interest for
seismic data acquisition.
■ One year to two years to acquire and process seismic data and identify
drillable prospects.
■ A year or more to contract and schedule a drilling rig to carry out a drilling program.
■ Six to 10 months to drill and complete an exploratory well.
■ Six months to a year for follow-up evaluation of drilling results, which can include
drilling a sidetrack well.
■ Another two to three years for additional delineation drilling, and formulating a
reservoir development plan if the exploratory well proves successful. During this
time, the company also is working on pre-permit studies, permitting, and design and
procurement for production facilities, including surface and subsurface equipment
and systems,
■ One year or more is needed for facilities installation, followed by development drilling,
which can take one to two additional years. During this period, the company is
involved in design, permitting, engineering, procurement and installation of a pipeline
or offshore system to bring production to market.
Gulf of Mexico oil and gas companies are producing a massive amount of energy with a
small – and shrinking – physical footprint.
December
2,018 10,773,137 540 2,766,936 1,478 8,006,201 1.73 mbpd
2021
December
3,257 17,331,283 873 4,301,193 2,381 13,030,090 1.73 mbpd
2016
December
5,873 31,576,909 1,244 6,065,566 4,629 25,511,343 1.25 mbpd
2011
Source: BOEM, EIA (As of March 2022, there are 1,997 active leases, with 479 producing leases, 1,518 non-producing leases in the Gulf of Mexico.)
Leasing data demonstrates that the industry is innovating and advancing technologies
to do more with less. Over the 10-year period from 2011, the industry increased oil
production in the Gulf of Mexico by 38 percent while the number of producing leases
decreased by 57 percent. This is an impressive achievement, but access to resources
remains key to continued progress in provide the energy supplies relied upon by
Americans. Continued offshore lease sales are absolutely imperative because it is only
through a robust leasing program with biannual opportunities to secure leases that
companies are able to find and develop the most prospective targets. In the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico, the industry continues to innovate and develop the systems to produce more
resources with an ever decreasing footprint. The preference for all stakeholders should
be to enable consistent lease sales that allow steady and predictable development and
production from this strategic region.
According to Rystad Energy, global oil exploration activities must ramp up to meet
global demand through 2050. More than $3 trillion in capital expenditure will be
needed to add the undeveloped and undiscovered resources necessary for the global
market. Rystad analysts expect deepwater areas to play a prominent role in building
essential energy supplies. According to Rystad Senior Upstream Analyst Palzor Shenga,
“Upstream players may have to more than double their conventional exploration efforts
in order to meet global oil demand through 2050.” [FIGURE 4]
The implications of what happens when oil production cannot meet oil demand
surfaced as the world emerged from pandemic lockdowns. The year 2021 saw a strong
economic recovery – domestically and globally – as some degree of normalcy resumed.
Oil consumption grew by a very strong 6.1 percent in 2021, but it takes time, capital, and
bb
Resource
+ 121
bb
484
bb
increment via
1. Appraisal
2. Technological
enhancements 47 70%
3. EOR, etc. bb
Source: Rystad Energy UCube, research and analysis, as reported in Offshore Magazine, “Exploration overdrive urgently required, report claims,”
December 10, 2020.16
entire teams of experts to ramp up production safely and responsibly, and producers
could not immediately meet the demand.
Oil production grew by a “tepid” 1.5% with prices jumping sharply as demand outpaced
supply 17. Brent crude oil, a global benchmark, started the year at $50 per barrel and
increased to a high of $86 per barrel in late October before declining in the final weeks
of the year 18 . The trend continued in 2022, with $98 per barrel forecasted in the fourth
quarter of 2022 and $97 per barrel forecasted in the first quarter of 202319. A recurring
16. https://www.offshore-mag.com/drilling-completion/article/14188804/exploration-overdrive-urgently-required-rystad-
energy-report-claims
17. https://www.forbes.com/sites/thebakersinstitute/2022/08/23/oil-is-the-outlier-in-the-worlds-post-covid-energy-
recovery/?sh=4b3f9605e840
18. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=50738
19. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/report/prices.php#:~:text=The%20Brent%20crude%20oil%20spot,and%20
%2497%2Fb%20in%202023.
The U.S. Gulf of Mexico has been a steady and reliable source of oil production over
the past several decades and achieved a leadership position globally for deepwater
development, maintaining production at more than one million barrels of oil per day
since 1997. The United States must sustain production from this region if the country is
to meet domestic demand.
Analysts at Energy & Industry Advisory Partners (EIAP) published a study titled The
Economic Impacts of a 5-Year Leasing Program Delay for the Gulf of Mexico Oil and
Natural Gas Industry that looks at the drop in production from the Gulf of Mexico if
lease sales are disrupted20. An uninterrupted leasing program in the Gulf of Mexico
would produce an average of 2.6 million barrels equivalent of oil and natural gas per
day from 2022-2040. Eliminating lease sales would result in about 500,000 barrels
equivalent per day less over that period, amounting to approximately 3.3 billion barrels
equivalent of lost production.
The following table shows the anticipated loss in oil and natural gas production with no
lease sales in the program:
Oil (Base Case) 1,598,583 1,680,500 1,757,167 1,892,167 1,644,083 1,696,200 1,770,904
Total BOE (Base Case) 2,146,834 2,164,725 2,202,309 2,355,794 2,004,478 2,045,289 2,135,368
Offshore leasing has a clear and profound impact on U.S. oil and natural gas supplies.
Under the base case, with continued unabated Gulf of Mexico leasing, offshore oil
production from the Gulf is projected to increase to a high mark of 2,443,896 barrels
per day in 2032 and is expected to be near current levels, 1,779,534 barrels per day
projected, in 2040. If there are no lease sales in the program, offshore production from
the Gulf is expected to be 1,791,263 barrels per day in 2032, a drop of more than 600,000
barrel per day from the base case. A delayed leasing program results in 1,320,109
20. https://www.noia.org/noia-one-pagers-infographics/#flipbook-df_223664/1/
Natural Gas (Base Case) 379,846 411,896 423,869 435,216 443,651 454,074
Total BOE (Base Case) 2,242,490 2,457,779 2,533,314 2,592,696 2,638,632 2,710,373
Natural Gas (Base Case) 456,644 489,210 535,392 546,145 543,756 538,374
Total BOE (Base Case) 2,727,966 2,831,663 2,937,854 2,990,041 2,950,860 2,882,674
Natural Gas (Base Case) 532,478 524,431 511,863 497,875 489,172 481,191
Total BOE (Base Case) 2,808,623 2,712,152 2,574,587 2,428,753 2,338,230 2,260,725
barrels per day of production in 2040, a drop of more than 400,000 barrel per day from
the base case.
According to the EIAP study, “A key requirement for continued Gulf of Mexico oil and
natural gas production is continued lease sales, which enable operators to explore new
acreage for previously undiscovered resources, develop new projects, and underpin
100
80
60
68% 69% 71% onshore
40
20
32% 31% 29% offshore
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
FIGURE 6
Source: U.S. Outer Continental Shelf Gulf of Mexico Region: Oil and Gas Production Forecast 2022-2031, OCS
Report BOEM 2022-022, page 23. Figure 14: OCS, GOMR Annual Oil Forecast
Table 3 below shows the oil forecast in tabular form.
Table 3: Annual Oil Forecast by Forecast Component (thousands of barrels of oil per day)
Contingent Undiscovered
Year Reserves Total Forecast
Resources Resources
24 NOIA | THE U.S. GULF OF MEXICO
2022 1,540 350 2 1,892
2023 1,363 575 62 2,000
2024 1,200 728 86 2,013
2305CP_NOIA.indd 24 2025 1,061 842 149 2,052 4/28/23 6:08 PM
existing and planned projects by allowing operators to backfill production into facilities
with declining production.”21
The offshore region more generally is recognized as a preferred global region for
offshore oil and natural gas investment. Historically, offshore production has accounted
for about thirty percent of total oil production globally [FIGURE 5]. The BOEM’s own
estimates for the Gulf of Mexico demonstrate continued high levels of oil production
for the region and also assume that federal leasing for offshore tracts continues for the
forecast period [FIGURE 6]. The U.S. has been producing oil in the federal Gulf of Mexico
waters since the 1940s and production from the Gulf has been steadily increasing over
the past 30 years. In fact, this region has been producing more than one million barrels
of oil per day since 1997 and hit its highest level of production on record of 2.044 million
barrels per day in August of 2019, just before the onset of the pandemic [FIGURE 7].
FIGURE 7
Federal Offshore — Gulf of Mexico Field Production of Crude Oil
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
The U.S. Gulf of Mexico ranked second in the world based on the volume of new
discoveries of oil from 2015-2019 (shown in billions of barrels) as reported by Rystad
Energy in November 201922 .
Following increased investment and additional discoveries offshore Guyana, the most
recent Rystad Energy estimate places Guyana discoveries since 2015 at more than 11
billion barrels.23
This number tells an important story. The oil and natural gas industry continues to
invest in offshore projects around the world because the hydrocarbons produced
offshore have clear and positive economic, environmental, and climate attributes
compared to other regions.
Offshore oil and gas development is recognized for providing among the lowest carbon
barrels of oil in the world, and the U.S. Gulf of Mexico stands out as a global leader.
In the interest of reducing the carbon intensity of oil and gas development globally
and boosting energy security, the U.S. oil and gas policy should proactively attract
investment to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
22. https://guyanapetroleumdigest.ca/2019/11/26/guyana-still-leads-world-offshore-oil-discoveries-since-2015-2019-with-
6-8-billion-barrels/
23. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2022/07/28/new-oil-power-guyana-on-pace-to-surpass-us-offshore-by-
2035/?sh=59eb17cc6c06
25
20
rest of world
15
United States
10
Norway
Mexico
5 Brazil
Saudi Arabia
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
BOEM recognizes a promising future for oil development in the Gulf of Mexico.
According to the 2021 Assessment of Technically and Economically Recoverable Oil
and Natural Gas Resources of the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf24 , the region
contains estimated undiscovered technically recoverable resources in the range of
23.31 billion barrels of oil to 36.27 billion barrels of oil. We know from experience that
technology advancements will continue to enable the discovery and development
of ever-increasing volumes, resulting in a continuous upward trend over time in the
estimated undiscovered technical recoverable resources in the Gulf of Mexico.
These estimates mean nothing, however, if companies do not have the opportunity to
continue to lease acreage for development through regular, formalized lease sales. It
is critical that the U.S. does not cede ground in offshore energy production to other
regions and that it recognizes that it is in the best interests of Americans for public
policy to encourage and attract investment to U.S. offshore production opportunities.
24. https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/documents/regions/gulf-mexico-ocs-region/resource-evaluation/2021%20
Gulf%20of%20Mexico%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20Resource%20Assessment%20%28BOEM%202021-082%29.pdf
The cost of energy is fundamentally driven by supply and demand, and recently, global
markets have been disrupted by a supply crunch in both the oil and natural gas markets.
The energy paradigm has shifted over the past decade, with the United States rising to
a position of energy power and emerging as the leading producer of both oil and natural
gas in the world.
Vice Chairman of IHS Markit Daniel Yergin explains how things have changed:
According to the old script, United States oil production was too marginal to
affect world oil prices. But the gap today between demand and available supply
on the world market is narrow. The additional oil Saudi Arabia is putting into the
market will help replace Iranian exports as they are increasingly squeezed out
of the market by sanctions…. But if America’s increase … [in oil production] …
had not occurred, then the world oil market would be even tighter. We would be
looking at much higher prices – and voters would be even angrier.25
Mr. Yergin made this point in 2012 at the outset of the shale revolution, but the
significance of U.S. production for global energy markets is as important as ever today.
In fact, Mr. Yergin reiterated this very point in February 2022 in the aptly title op-ed in
the Wall Street Journal, “America Takes Pole Position on Oil and Gas.”
Analysts recognize that the downturn in the oil and natural gas industry from 2014-2020,
combined with ill-conceived policies and investment approaches, led to significant
underinvestment in oil and natural gas exploration and infrastructure. According to
Simon Flowers, Chairman, Chief Analyst at Wood Mackenzie and author of a weekly
column called The Edge, “Underinvestment in oil supply will lead to a tight oil market later
this decade. It’s a narrative that’s gained increasing traction as capital expenditure on
upstream oil and gas has shrunk. Spend in 2021 is half the peak of 2014 after slumping to
new depths in [2021’s] crisis.”26
Mr. Flowers poses the question, “How much new oil supply does the world need?” His
answer is, “A lot–we reckon about 20 million b/d from 2022 to 2030.”
According to Flowers, “This is the ‘supply gap’, the difference between our estimate
of demand in 2030 and the volumes we forecast existing fields already onstream or
under development can deliver.”27 If his numbers are correct, a huge amount of new oil
25. Daniel Yergin, “America’s New Energy Reality,” The New York Times, June 9, 2012
26. https://www.woodmac.com/news/the-edge/is-the-world-sleepwalking-into-an-oil-supply-crunch/
27. https://www.woodmac.com/news/the-edge/is-the-world-sleepwalking-into-an-oil-supply-crunch/
is needed to close the expected gap between the supply and demand and help bring
stability and affordability to oil and petroleum product prices.
Rystad Energy echoes the concern about the supply gap and the huge amount of
investment needed to close it. According to Rystad, more exploration for oil and
gas is needed to supply the volumes needed worldwide by 2050.28 In fact, it will take
massive investment just to keep pace with growing demand. Rystad suggests capital
expenditures of at least $3 trillion will be required to replenish declining production from
currently producing assets around the world to meet expected global demand in 2050.
Saudi Aramco CEO Amin H. Nasser identified the crux of the issue with the energy crisis in
his remarks during the Schlumberger Digital Forum, on September 20, 2022:
When historians reflect on this crisis, they will see that the warning signs in
global energy policies were flashing red for almost a decade. Many of us have
been insisting for years that if investments in oil and gas continued to fall,
28. https://www.offshore-mag.com/drilling-completion/article/14188804/exploration-overdrive-urgently-required-rystad-
energy-report-claims
In fact, oil and gas investments crashed by more than 50% between 2014 and
last year, from $700 billion to a little over $300 billion. The increases this year are
too little, too late, too short-term.
In reality, once the global economy started to emerge from lockdowns, oil
demand came surging back, and so did gas.29
Mr. Nasser’s remarks about the challenges ahead are similarly profound, “Oil inventories
are low, and effective global spare capacity is now about one and a half percent of
global demand. Equally concerning is that oil fields around the world are declining on
average at about 6% each year, and more than 20% in some older fields last year. At
these levels, simply keeping production steady needs a lot of capital in its own right,
while increasing capacity requires a lot more.”30
We are fortunate in the United States that our Gulf of Mexico region is up to the task of
delivering the oil and gas the economy needs. Production numbers from the U.S. Gulf
of Mexico place it in the company of some of the largest oil producing countries. If the
Gulf of Mexico were its own country, it would be one of the top eleven oil producing
countries [FIGURE 9].
The U.S. offshore oil producing basin can help address the current and projected
gap between global supply and demand. Bringing to market oil from this region will
help exert downward pressure on the price of oil and petroleum products such as
gasoline, which has become a more costly necessity for American consumers as well
as businesses.
Offshore projects around the world contribute massive amounts of natural gas to global
production volumes, and prolific areas like the U.S. Gulf of Mexico can help address
issues surrounding the tightening in global natural gas supplies, which has led to record
high prices in various regions. Although natural gas production from the U.S. offshore
has hovered around two billion cubic feet (bcf) per day, Gulf of Mexico production in the
late 1990s exceeded 5 bcf per day, and there is significant potential for growth. Today,
29. https://www.aramco.com/en/news-media/speeches/2022/remarks-by-amin-h-nasser-at-schlumberger-digital-forum#
30. https://www.aramco.com/en/news-media/speeches/2022/remarks-by-amin-h-nasser-at-schlumberger-digital-forum#
the United States is a leading exporter of LNG at a time when demand for U.S. LNG is
growing from our allies around the world31. If the United States were to invest in more
offshore development, natural gas production from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico could feed
31. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/firms-make-deals-boost-lng-exports-60-us-canada-
mexico-2022-08-23/
Expanding natural gas production and usage provides environmental benefits as well.
For example, replacing coal with natural gas in power generation significantly reduces
emissions. According to Fatih Birol, Executive Director of the International Energy
Agency (IEA), “Natural gas is one of the mainstays of global energy. Where it replaces
more polluting fuels, it improves air quality and limits emissions of carbon dioxide.”32
Burning natural gas for power generation produces about half as much carbon dioxide
as coal to produce the same amount of energy.
CO2 emissions associated with generating electricity from coal and natural gas
differ because of differences in the fuels themselves—coal has more carbon
content per unit of energy. In addition, coal-fired plants and natural gas-fired
plants differ in how efficiently they convert their respective fuels to electricity.
The amount of CO2 produced when a fuel is burned depends on a fuel’s carbon
content. Coal produces more CO2 per unit of energy than natural gas does when
burned. Coal consumption for electricity generation produces 209 pounds of
CO2 per million British thermal units (MMBtu), compared with 117 pounds of CO2 /
MMBtu for natural gas.33
According to the EIA, the shift from coal to natural gas in U.S. power generation has had
profound positive emissions benefits for the U.S., catapulting the U.S. to leadership in
GHG emissions reductions around the world. “Over the past 15 years, the U.S. electricity
generation mix has shifted away from coal and toward natural gas and renewables,
resulting in lower CO2 emissions from electricity generation. In 2019, the U.S. electric
power sector produced 1,724 million metric tons (MMmt) of CO2, 32% less than the
2,544 MMmt produced in 2005.”34
The following EIA graphic shows the impactful decline in emissions attributable to the
rise in natural gas production and use in the United States [FIGURE 10].
32. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-gas-in-todays-energy-transitions
33. “Electric power sector CO2 emissions drop as generation mix shifts from coal to natural gas,” This Week in Energy, U.S.
Energy Information Administration, June 9, 2021.
34. “Electric power sector CO2 emissions drop as generation mix shifts from coal to natural gas,” This Week in Energy, U.S.
Energy Information Administration, June 9, 2021.
35. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-gas-in-todays-energy-transitions (Reprinted from IEA)
FIGURE 11
CO2 savings from coal-to-gas switching in selected regions compared with 2010, 2018
Mt CO2
0
-100
-200
-300
-400
-500
-600
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Unfortunately, the current energy crisis and the energy challenges associated with
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have pushed countries to revert to coal power generation,
and in some regions, the move has been substantial. In June 2022, The Washington
Post reported that several European countries were in the process of making the
switch, “Austria, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands announced plans this week to
prepare to resurrect old coal plants as gas supplies dwindled. The moves came just days
after Moscow reduced natural gas flows to several European countries, including Italy
and Slovakia, alarming leaders who are worried about energy reserves ahead of winter.”37
Reuters has confirmed there is now a rush for coal supplies from European buyers to
secure the energy needed ahead of the coming winter,
Prices for thermal coal, used to generate electricity, have leapt to record levels
as a result of the war, which has led to many European countries losing access
to vital supplies of natural gas and coal from their top provider Russia. Buyers in
Europe and beyond are now vying to pay top dollar for coal from often remote
mines in places such as Tanzania, Botswana and even potentially Madagascar.
The resurgent coal demand, driven by governments trying to wean themselves
off Russian energy while keeping a lid on power prices, clashes with climate plans
to shift away from the most polluting fossil fuel.38
And Nasdaq has reported that European imports of coal are expected to hit some
of the highest levels in years, “European imports of thermal coal could be the
highest in at least four years in 2022 and may rise further next year, analysts said on
Monday, highlighting the extent of the energy crisis resulting from sanctions on top
supplier Russia.”39
36. Salovaara, “Coal to Natural Gas Fuel Switching and CO2 Emissions Reduction,” Harvard College, 2011, at pages 87-88.
37. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/06/22/coal-plant-europe-germany-austria-netherlands-russia-gas/
38. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/coal-rush-energy-crisis-fires-global-hunt-polluting-fuel-2022-09-20/
39. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/going-back-in-time:-europes-coal-imports-to-hit-multi-year-highs-in-2022
Although other countries are exerting pressure on China and India to reduce emissions,
it is clear that the global economy will continue to rely on supplies of energy that are
affordable and reliable even if they are not the best choices for the environment. An
“all of the above” approach considers both traditional fuels and renewables to provide
the energy necessary for the fundamentals of life. Growth in renewable energy and
offshore wind will be strong for years to come, and natural gas will play an important and
expanding role, filling the gap as a much cleaner alternative to coal. Gas production from
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico has great potential to help keep energy costs affordable and
support U.S. allies around the globe.
High energy prices impact all Americans, but they disproportionately impact low income
and minority communities in which many must decide between food, healthcare, or
energy bills. In a different way, businesses that rely on affordable and reliable supplies
of energy suffer as well. Today, manufacturers in Europe are laying off employees and
shutting down factories in direct response to high prices of natural gas and electricity.41
Policies that promote U.S. Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas production promote
important principles of economic justice by helping those in need with greater energy
affordability and jobs, and help fuel the businesses and factories upon which the world
economy relies.
40. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/chinese-coal-based-power-plants
41. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/19/business/europe-energy-crisis-factories.html
Offshore oil and gas development is capital intensive. In 2021, an EIAP study titled The
Gulf of Mexico Oil & Gas Project Lifecyle: Building an American Energy & Economic
Anchor places the total lifetime spend to develop and produce a deepwater Gulf of
Mexico at approximately $8.8 billion. The average annual spend is nearly $295 million,
with the highest spending levels taking place during project development, when
subsea tieback development is taking place, and during decommissioning. The average
shallow-water project results in an estimated $1.3 billion total lifetime spending,
including $27.5 million in annual operational expenditures.42
In another EIAP study, The Economic Impacts of a 5-Year Leasing Program Delay for
the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry,43 released in 2022, analysts projected
Gulf of Mexico offshore oil and gas spending for 2022 would be approximately $30.3
billion. Across the forecast period from 2022-2040, EIAP estimates Gulf of Mexico the
offshore oil and natural gas industry will spend $30.6 billion per year. This investment
projection assumes there will be no interruption in Gulf of Mexico oil and gas
lease sales.
However, the study shows that lease sale delays serves to dramatically reduce
projected domestic investment. According to the 2022 study, an extensive delay in
federal offshore leasing (or zero lease sales) could result in a drop in capital expenditure
of about $10 billion in the peak year and a nearly $100 billion capital spending loss over
the forecast period.
The study provides a high degree of granularity, identifying the specific types of
spending that take place throughout the lease life cycle. The table below shows the
breakdown in spending for a multitude of areas of offshore oil and gas development for
2021 and 2022:
42. https://www.noia.org/noia-reports/#flipbook-df_218475/1/
43. https://www.noia.org/noia-one-pagers-infographics/#flipbook-df_223664/1/
Source: Energy & Industrial Advisory Partners, The Economic Impacts of a 5-Year Leasing Program Delay for
the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry, March 29, 2022. page 59.44
Thousands of companies support offshore Gulf of Mexico oil and gas development.
While the bulk of the work and a significant portion of the spending occur along the Gulf
Coast, the supply chain for offshore oil and gas development is long and strong, with
vendors in every state getting business from the activity.
In a 2021 study, The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas
Industry, EIAP identified more than 2,400 companies distributed across all 50 states
that provide supplies or services to the offshore sector. EIAP offers this example as a
snapshot of the range of companies that benefit from offshore oil and gas, noting, “This
list greatly underestimates the number of companies who supply the industry.”45 The
44. https://www.noia.org/noia-one-pagers-infographics/#flipbook-df_223664/1/
45. https://www.noia.org/noia-reports/#flipbook-df_217502/1/, at page 6
With U.S. and global demand for oil and gas expected to rise for the next two decades,
high levels of spending stemming from offshore oil and gas leasing will continue to
sustain businesses across the country.
Offshore oil and gas development is widely recognized as an employment engine that
provides good-paying jobs. The study, The Economic Impacts of a 5-Year Leasing
Program Delay for the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry,46 estimates
offshore oil and natural gas employment numbers under the base case with no
interruption in lease sales at an average of 372,012 jobs per year throughout the forecast
period of 2022-204047:
Texas 166,737 158,715 155,767 147,462 133,381 136,682 158,256 169,253 164,634
Louisiana 98,247 94,932 95,089 94,621 89,432 89,175 98,473 107,040 106,535
Mississippi 21,524 20,740 20,926 20,415 19,110 19,116 21,593 23,268 22,947
Alabama 29,595 28,870 29,053 28,011 25,157 26,508 29,250 30,871 30,276
Other U.S. States 65,041 60,861 59,631 54,989 43,624 52,990 63,954 63,667 59,865
Total 381,144 364,119 360,465 345,498 310,703 324,472 371,525 394,099 384,257
Other U.S. States 60,641 60,881 61,335 62,846 65,014 62,801 58,175 53,819
46. https://www.noia.org/noia-one-pagers-infographics/#flipbook-df_223664/1/
47. https://www.noia.org/noia-one-pagers-infographics/#flipbook-df_223664/1/, at page 51.
Other U.S. States 51,622 48,733 45,040 43,496 46,369 49,944 51,839 53,838
Not surprisingly, the large majority of jobs are along the Gulf Coast, but the offshore
industry depends on supplies and services from the work of Americans in every state.
With its extensive reach and impact, the Gulf of Mexico oil and gas industry supports
between 40,000 and 65,000 jobs each year outside the Gulf Coast.
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 -9 -150
Other U.S. States -5,724 -10,739 -16,608 -22,096 -25,458 -24,323 -17,011
Other U.S. States -15,415 -13,278 -11,916 -8,486 -6,165 -4,014 -3,755
The 2021 EIAP report, The Gulf of Mexico Oil & Gas Project Lifecyle: Building an
American Energy & Economic Anchor, describes the sizable economic and employment
footprint of shallow-water and deepwater project life cycles to provide a foundation
for developing employment estimates. EIAP establishes the credibility of its numbers,
basing them on a vast database that allows analysts to break down offshore energy
development into five distinct stages: pre-development, development, operations, infill
drilling and tiebacks, and abandonment and decommissioning. Each stage is further
segmented to identify individual activities, types of equipment, primary company
and supplier types, sub-supplier types, and types of employment. Finally, the study
describes the fields of work, occupations, and wages for workers throughout the life
cycle of a lease.
One of the things that differentiates a Gulf of Mexico project from other types of
construction efforts is that it has a massive economic impact over their entire project
life cycle. EIAP identified more 200 types of jobs involved in U.S. Gulf of Mexico oil and
gas production. Together, the women and men who fill these positions work to safely
produce lower-emission, environmentally responsible barrels of oil and natural gas.
Offshore oil and gas jobs are varied and high paying, with an average industry wage
of $69,650, or 29% higher than the national average. Every U.S. state has jobs and
investments tied to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico oil and gas industry.
An average deepwater project produces about $3 billion in total direct wages. Direct
employment associated with a modern deepwater project development averages over
1,435 jobs across the project’s 30-year lifecycle. Indirect and induced employment is
projected to account for an average of over 2,200 additional jobs.
While employment during the first two years of a project’s lifecycle is estimated at only
an average of 880 jobs, during the most active years of the project employment impacts
peak at nearly 14,400 jobs. During normal operations, total supported employment
is projected at around 1,900 jobs. While, these numbers are associated with just one
project, the Gulf of Mexico is illustrated by dozens of such projects and an investment
horizon that could span several decades.
The offshore industry provides jobs to Americans of all walks of life in communities
throughout the Gulf Coast and the country. Our industry includes companies owned
and managed by all demographics, including women, African Americans, Latinos, Native
Americans, and veterans. Offshore leasing will continue on a global scale over the
coming decades. The offshore oil and gas industry further provides new workers with
the knowledge, skills, and abilities that will be essential for not only oil and gas projects,
but also for renewable energy development.
The U.S. offshore operates under one of the strongest regulatory and oversight regimes
in the world, which means production here in the United States is more environmentally
friendly than operations in many producing regions in the world. The carbon intensity of
the Gulf of Mexico is 50 percent of that of other producing regions50. Part of the reason
is that U.S. Gulf of Mexico developments deliver high volumes of oil and gas with a far
smaller physical footprint. In 2019, 18 offshore facilities (with a combined surface area
equal to about nine city blocks) produced 75 percent of offshore production51.
The region is also a leader for methane release reductions. This is in large part because
methane releases are closely regulated offshore. Volumes of gas, of which methane is a
primary component, to be flared or vented from offshore facilities are tightly regulated
under the provisions of 30 CFR 250 Subpart K. Over the past few decades, operators
49. https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/reports/shallow-water-report-01.pdf
50. Motiwala, and Ismail, “Statistical Study of Carbon Intensities in the GOM and PB,” ChemRxiv, April 13, 2020.
51. Director Scott Angelle, BSEE Director, BSEE Presentation to the Deepwater Technical Symposium, November 13, 2020.
have moved away from using natural gas driven pneumatic devices to instrument air,
eliminating the methane emissions from operation of such devices. Furthermore,
gas detection systems are generally deployed on facilities, allowing operators to
identify and address methane gas leaks, further reducing methane emissions from
offshore facilities.
Management practices and related regulations for venting and flaring of methane in
the offshore have helped to dramatically reduce the practice in the Gulf of Mexico. The
U.S. Gulf of Mexico accounted for 15% of U.S. oil production in 2019, yet EIA data shows
venting and flaring emissions from offshore oil and gas operations accounted for a
mere 2.6% percent of nationwide energy production venting and flaring emissions in
2019.52 EPA data also shows methane emissions from offshore oil and gas production
accounted for less than one percent of total nationwide methane emissions in 2019.53
In short, the U.S. and world depend upon reliable supplies of oil and natural gas for a high
quality of life and to lift people out of poverty, and U.S. offshore production should be
52. https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_a_EPG0_VGV_mmcf_a.htm
53. Draft 2021 Greenhouse Gas Inventory
In fact, a 2016 report at the end of the Obama Administration—issued under then-
Secretary Sally Jewell—stated, “U.S. GHG emissions would be higher if BOEM were
to have no lease sales…. Emissions from substitutions are higher due to exploration,
development, production, and transportation of oil from international sources being
more carbon intensive.”54
Recent research from multiple sources continues to validate the low carbon benefits of
U.S. Gulf of Mexico oil leasing and production:
In the report, “Oil and Gas Assets at Risk, How will clean energy’s rise impact oil and
gas communities in the United States amidst shrinking fossil fuel demand?”,55 authored
by Rystad Energy, Dr. Zeke Hausfather, Mark Boling, and Peter Liu, the Institute finds
“Despite potentially significant declines in global oil and gas demand across the climate
scenarios by 2050, our findings clearly indicate that investment in new oil and gas fields
may still be necessary to meet future demand for oil and gas in all three of the climate
change mitigation scenarios.”
54. https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/oil-and-gas-energy-program/Leasing/Five-Year-Program/2017-2022/
OCS-Report-BOEM-2016-065—-OCS-Oil-and-Natural-Gas—-Potential-Lifecycle-GHG-Emissions-and-Social-Cost-
of-Carbon.pdf.
55. https://thebreakthrough.org/articles/oil-and-gas-assets-at-risk-impacts-of-declining-fossil-production-in-climate-
scenarios-in-the-us
“New investment in oil and gas fields is likely to occur throughout the world, driven
primarily by economic competitiveness and proximity to demand centers of each field.
In the Rystad modeling, substantial greenfield investment occurs in all of the major
producing regions in the world to 2050, including the United States.”
■ “[N]ew investment could be required in greenfield oil and gas production, including
substantial new greenfield production in the United States, in order to meet future
demand. Political initiatives to entirely ban oil and gas production or prevent
investment may therefore be unrealistic or uneconomic.”
■ “The total greenhouse gas impact of oil varies quite substantially across the world
based on the source and method of production….”
■ “Our field-level economic analysis demonstrates that w oil and gas production is
relatively low carbon and, therefore, would be minimally impacted by carbon pricing
in absolute terms relative to production in other regions[]. In particular, US oil is the
“cleanest” on average in the world, although not the cheapest….”
■ “This finding has implications for domestic US oil and gas policy. To reduce the
marginal emissions of oil and gas production, while ensuring security of supply for
the United States and its allies, policy makers should avoid penalizing or preventing
US production exclusively. Rather, policies that promote more aggressive emissions
reductions for US oil and gas production could also seek to displace higher-emitting
products from other major regions of production, thus minimizing the climate impact
of remaining global oil and gas use in a low-emissions future.”56
Wood Mackenzie: According to Wood Mackenzie, reducing oil production from the U.S.
Gulf of Mexico would increase the average emissions rate for global oil production:
56. https://thebreakthrough.org/articles/oil-and-gas-assets-at-risk-impacts-of-declining-fossil-production-in-climate-
scenarios-in-the-us
McKinsey: In the report titled “How the Gulf of Mexico can further the energy
transition,” McKinsey describes four key factors that give the deepwater Gulf of Mexico
a “low carbon advantage”:
First, in contrast to other regions where flaring natural gas without a market is
more commonplace, most of the natural gas produced in the Gulf of Mexico is
sold to local markets, which results in minimal routine flaring and, consequently,
less GHG emissions. Second, the facilities have efficient, modern designs that
minimize methane leakage. Third, wells and production facilities have a high
throughput, minimizing the number of energy-intensive processes required to
bring on new supply, such as drilling. And fourth, operators have made active
decarbonization efforts to stay in line with environmental sustainability goals
and in compliance with regulations.58
McKinsey estimates production from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico could decrease by about
800,000 barrels per day by 2040 without additional projects beyond those that have
already been sanctioned. In that situation, McKinsey expects lost production would
be made up by substitutions from other parts of the world without much oil demand
destruction. The country would be able to import sufficient oil, but it would come from
higher-emitting basins, resulting in an increase in greenhouse gas emissions globally:
This supply reduction would have to be offset by alternative sources to meet global
demand, which could hinder net-zero goals significantly. Because many other oil
producing regions globally have total unit costs similar to those in the Gulf of Mexico,
global oil price increases or substitution with other energy sources wouldn’t be
expected, and global demand for oil would remain unchanged. Instead, the reduced
Gulf supply would be offset by production increases from other sources, such as other
deepwater basins, shale, and OPEC. Based on the higher emissions per barrel of this
new supply, global emissions would increase by 50 million to 100 million metric tons of
CO2e through 2040.59
McKinsey also points out other significant, adverse consequences if America moves
away from deepwater Gulf of Mexico oil production, “A shift in production from the Gulf
57. https://www.woodmac.com/news/the-challenge-of-negative-emissions/
58. Brown, Di Fiori, Smith, and Yanosek, “Deepwater Gulf of Mexico’s role during the energy transition,” McKinsey, September
2022, at pages 3-4.
59. Brown, Di Fiori, Smith, and Yanosek, “Deepwater Gulf of Mexico’s role during the energy transition,” McKinsey, September
2022, at page 6.
Offshore energy is a true story of accomplishing more with less – creating more energy
with less environmental impact. Offshore production platforms are incredible edifices
of continuously evolving technology that allow enormous amounts of energy to be
produced through a relatively small footprint. Incredibly, 18 deepwater facilities, which
equate to about the size of only nine city blocks, produce about the same amount of oil
as the entire state of North Dakota.61
The offshore oil and gas sector operates with an unremitting commitment to safety
and environmental protection. BSEE has highlighted key data points in the area of
environmental performance:
■ Consistently achieved ratio of less than 1.25% flared/vented gas to produced gas;
one of the best performing producing provinces in the USA
■ Zero incidental marine mammal or sea turtle fatalities from OCS oil and gas
exploration and production activities from at least 2017 through November 2020 [the
date of the presentation]
■ Less oil spilled in 2018 and 2019 form active exploration and production operations
on federal offshore leases in at least a quarter century
■ 2018 ratio of volume spilled to volume produced: approximately 13 tablespoons in a
660,430 gallon Olympic-sized pool
■ 2019 ratio of volume spilled to volume produced: approximately 17 tablespoons in a
660,430 gallon Olympic-sized pool62
From a worker safety standpoint, the offshore oil and gas industry has performed with
a low recordable injury/illness rate when compared to other industries. The following
chart shows the continued low injury/illness trend rate for the sector [FIGURE 13].
Inarguably, any injury is one too many, and the industry continues to work collaboratively
in safety programs and with Interior, other key agencies, and the academic community
in a continuous effort to identify and mitigate against risks.
60. Brown, Di Fiori, Smith, and Yanosek, “Deepwater Gulf of Mexico’s role during the energy transition,” McKinsey, September
2022, at page 6.
61. Director Scott Angelle, BSEE Director, BSEE Presentation to the Deepwater Technical Symposium, November 13, 2020.
62. Director Scott Angelle, BSEE Director, BSEE Presentation to the Deepwater Technical Symposium, November 13, 2020.
3.5
Service Providers (All)
3
2.5
Electric Power Generation, Transmission, Distribution
2
1.5
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Service Providing, All (Multiple NAICS Codes) Electric Power Gen., Trans., Distrib. (NAICS Code 2211)
OCS Oil & Gas, Overall (BSEE Data)2 Nuclear Electric Power Generation (NAICS Code 221113)2
America’s offshore energy sector employs technologies that not long ago were
inconceivable. Today, satellites provide real-time imaging and communications support
for offshore oil and gas platforms. On the seafloor, subsea autonomous robots are
monitoring production and equipment health, providing real-time data to engineering
experts on the offshore platforms as well as in onshore facilities that connect experts
from around the world to enable the best operational decisions to be made. Remote
operations and automation have eliminated the need for large offshore crews for
certain activities, which not only cuts down on trips to and from the assets but improves
safety for offshore workers.
Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) are revolutionizing the industry’s
decision-making abilities. Automated sensing and inspection allow companies to
Technology advances are shrinking an already small offshore footprint. The U.S.
offshore industry is producing increasingly more energy without appreciably expanding
the real estate required for operations, which preserves the U.S. Gulf of Mexico’s
performance as a low-emissions basin.
Offshore production is the energy anchor the world needs. Multi-billion-dollar offshore
projects produce massive amounts of oil and natural gas, and advances in technology
are enabling offshore fields to produce more, cleaner barrels for even longer. Seismic
technology and better and smarter subsea tiebacks and other infrastructure open
the door to a new era of productivity and efficiency, all while continuing to improve
environmental performance.
The graphic below shows some of the technology used in the offshore oil and gas
sector to promote safety, environmental protection, emissions reductions, reliability,
and efficiency [FIGURE 14].
Facilities
PRODUCTION PRODUCTION
Satellites
Rig Standardization
Floa
ting Containment Systems
prod
uctio
n New containment systems are the result
of unprecedented industry-government
collaboration and offer a full range of oil
spill response capabilities. These
Subsea Systems companies offer solutions to an ever
growing portfolio of extreme scenarios.
Advances in engineering and material
sciences have made subsea systems
more efficient and have lowered risks.
Blowout Preventer
A safety requirement to prevent the
uncontrolled release of oil or natural gas,
Remotely Operated Vehicles blowout preventers are constantly
advancing and are able to accommodate
ROVs, which now can incorporate artificial higher and higher stress environments.
intelligence, provide high-resolution
real-time imaging and can be used for
inspections and repairs.
From the moment an offshore platform is installed, it begins its transformation into a
flourishing marine ecosystem. BSEE states, “A typical eight-leg structure provides a
home for 12,000 to 14,000 fish, according to a study by the Coastal Marine Institute.
A typical four-leg structure provides two to three acres of habitat for hundreds of
marine species.”63
Concerns raised by fishermen, divers, and coastal states about potential damage to
marine life should offshore structures that had developed into marine ecosystems
be removed led to the Rigs to Reefs program, which was formalized by Congress as
the National Fishing Enhancement Act in 1984. This act supports the development of
63. https://www.bsee.gov/what-we-do/environmental-compliance/environmental-programs/rigs-to-reefs
According to BSEE, the Rigs to Reefs program provides the following benefits64:
■ For the environment, repurposing obsolete structures saves fuel emissions that
otherwise would be expended transporting and disposing of the structure. It also
enriches the marine life in the area.
■ For oil and gas companies, repurposing obsolete structures saves them the costs
of removing, transporting, and disposing of them onshore. BSEE regulations
require that, within one year of a lease’s expiration, the obsolete structure
must be removed.
■ For states, the artificial reefs attract marine life that enhance fisheries
and contribute to the economy by attracting recreational and commercial
fishing and diving.
64. https://www.bsee.gov/what-we-do/environmental-compliance/environmental-programs/rigs-to-reefs
Offshore rigs are among the most productive fish habitats in the world,
according to marine biologist Milton Love who has spent 20 years studying fish
populations around oil and gas platforms in California. They provide marine
wildlife with food, shelter from predators and a safe breeding ground.
For some species, the rigs are even better nurseries than natural reefs, says
Love. The towering pylons are the perfect spawning grounds for tiny fish larvae.
“A lot of them are just drifting,” says Love. “They want to settle.” The 500 ft (150m)
high underwater structures provide an opportunity for just that.
One of the big beneficiaries is rockfish, stocks of which have been heavily
depleted due to overfishing along the US West Coast. These fish are found
in abundance around oil platforms. For instance, the platforms have helped
revive the critically endangered bocaccio rockfish. “We’ve found a very high
density of young bocaccio at platforms, around 400,000 at six platforms. We
didn’t see that at natural reefs,” says Love, adding that the number of juvenile
bocaccio found at rigs was enough to boost the adult stock of the Pacific Coast
population by around 3%.65
[Emphasis in original publication.]
According to a study conducted by Love and others and published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, “Oil and gas platforms off the coast of California
have the highest secondary fish production per unit of area of seafloor of any
marine habitat that has been studied, about an order of magnitude higher than fish
communities from other marine ecosystems.”66
As of year-end 2021, more than 570 offshore facilities had been reefed in the Gulf of
Mexico. Research continues to demonstrate that offshore artificial reefs develop into
among the most flourishing marine ecosystems.
65. Gerretsen, Isabelle, “As offshore oil and gas platforms come to the end of their working lives, the remarkable ecosystems
beneath the waves come into their own,” January 26, 2021.
66. Claisse, Pindell, et. al. “Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally.” Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences. October 28, 2014.
America’s offshore oil and natural gas industry is characterized by the continued
advancement of technology and systems integrity, the application of extensive industry
technical standards, and a robust regulatory regime. The industry continues to develop
and improve on technologies to prevent environmental incidents, examining everything
from the materials used in offshore operations, to the development of software
and control systems to manage operations, to the development, production, and
deployment of modern drillships and production facilities that bring energy to market,
to the design and manufacture of blowout prevention systems, subsea safety valves,
and other innovative safety equipment.
API has more than 200 exploration and production standards that address offshore
operations, covering everything from subsea safety valves to comprehensive guidelines
for offshore safety programs, and an estimated 100 such documents have been
incorporated into federal regulations. Oil and gas operators on the OCS are subject to
myriad regulatory requirements, including more than two dozen statutory authorities
and more than 80 Code of Federal Regulation parts implemented pursuant to those
statutes. In addition, more than two dozen significant approvals and permits are
required for OCS operations.
Through BSEE and its predecessor agencies, the government has significantly
changed regulatory requirements applicable to offshore oil and natural gas operations.
Companies must implement safety and environmental management systems (SEMS),
and audits must be completed by independent third parties. BSEE regulations include
extensive requirements for well design and integrity and blowout preventer and control
systems. Under the current drilling safety provisions, BSEE requires, among other
things: identification of the mechanical barriers and cementing practices that will be
used; independent, third-party verification that the blowout prevention equipment
Another significant achievement of the U.S. offshore oil and natural gas industry is the
creation of well intervention and containment consortia that were founded in 2010 to
provide containment technology and response capabilities for the unique challenges of
capping a well releasing oil thousands of feet below the water’s surface. These groups,
which include MWCC and HWCG, maintain rapidly deployable systems designed to
stem the uncontrolled flow of hydrocarbons from a subsea well and provide training for
member companies on system installation and operation.
BSEE requires companies to demonstrate they have staff resources and access to
equipment to deploy systems to cap a well and capture uncontrolled hydrocarbons.
Companies prove their compliance with this requirement through a contract with
or membership in MWCC or HWCG. BSEE has also instituted new requirements for
determining the worst-case blowout discharge and the associated demonstration
of capability to effectively respond to such an event. On its part, the industry has
enhanced its ability to respond to a potential offshore environmental incident through
improved oil spill response planning and the increased availability of spill response
tools such as dispersants, in-situ burning capabilities, mechanical recovery, and
shoreline protection.
To ensure these requirements are being met, BSEE implements an active and ongoing
system of oversight and inspection. Data from 2019 provides a snapshot of the strong
oversight in place:
Interior confirmed the strength of its regulatory oversight system over offshore oil
and gas operations in its record of decision for Lease Sale 257. The decision, signed by
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Mineral Management Laura Daniel-
Davis on August 31, 2021, concluded:
To minimize the environmental impacts that could occur from OCS oil- and gas-
related activities following a lease sale, BOEM imposes mitigation measures that
have proven effective in the past in avoiding or reducing impacts. The mitigation
measures that I am adopting in the form of lease stipulations for this lease sale
are described below in Section 5. While offshore exploration and development
cannot be made risk free, OCS oil- and gas-related activities can be conducted
safely and responsibly with strong regulatory oversight and appropriate
measures to protect human safety and the environment. Since the Deepwater
Horizon explosion, oil spill, and response, BOEM and the Bureau of Safety and
Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) have raised standards for offshore drilling
safety and environmental protection to reduce the risk of oil spills and their
severity, and have improved the Federal Government’s and industry’s ability to
respond in the unlikely occurrence of another large oil spill….
The decision to hold Lease Sale 257 recognizes the role that GOM oil and gas
resources play in addressing the Nation’s demand for domestic energy sources
and fosters economic benefits, including employment, labor income, and tax
revenues, which are highest in Gulf Coast States and also distributed widely
across the United States. Revenues from offshore oil and gas lease sales support
67. Director Scott Angelle, BSEE Director, BSEE Presentation to the Deepwater Technical Symposium, November 13, 2020.
Hydrocarbon developments on the U.S. OCS are held to exceptionally high standards
for operations by some of the most robust regulations, oversight, and enforcement
in the world. The regulatory system provides assurances for safe, environmentally
responsible operations, establishing the U.S. as the gold standard for the development
and production of resources, where stringent requirements for operation are enforced
and where responsible development continues to drive down the carbon footprint
of operations.
68. https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/documents/oil-gas-energy/GOM-LS-257.pdf
Energy production from the Gulf of Mexico generates multiple revenue streams for
the government. The first is the bonus bid, paid up front to the U.S. government by
operators that acquire a federal oil and gas lease. The bonus bid is paid without any
knowledge of what resources might be discovered and is retained by the federal
government regardless of whether oil and gas are produced from the lease. The second
revenue stream comes from annual rental payments tendered to hold the lease until it
produces or expires. This revenue is paid to the federal government while companies
work through internal assessments and move through the robust permitting process
overseen by the DOI. The final revenue source is the royalty payment made when energy
resources are produced in federal waters, at which point companies extracting those
resources are required to pay the federal government—this is in recognition of the fact
that resources on public lands and waters are a public resource.69 Royalty rates have
increased over time for federal leases in the Gulf of Mexico. In 2008, the royalty rate was
increased to 18.75 percent for all water depths. In 2017, to encourage continued interest
in the more mature shallow waters, the royalty rate for newly acquired shallow water
leases was decreased from 18.75 percent to 12.5 percent. Since that time, however, 84
percent of the leases acquired at OCS lease sales have been in deepwater regions that
are subject to the higher 18.75 percent royalty rate.70
Critically, the significant payments brought in by offshore oil and gas payments help
fund a wide range of state and federal programs, namely around conservation and park
maintenance. Disbursements from offshore oil and gas in fiscal years 2016 through 2019
were enormous, reaching almost $5 billion in 2019:71
69. This discussion does not include taxes paid to federal, state, and local governments, which accounts for billions of dollars in
additional funding.
70. https://revenuedata.doi.gov/how-it-works/revenues/#oil-gas-rates
71. https://revenuedata.doi.gov/query-data/?dataType=Revenue
Historic
$0 $150,000,000 $150,000,000 $150,000,000
Preservation ...
FY2022 34.8 111.8 36.8 68.8 252.3 84.1 (est.) 336.4 (est.)
1,725.8
Total 188.4 567.0 194.9 344.1 1,294.5 431.2 (est.)
(est.)
Sources: Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR), “Natural Resources Revenue Data: Data Query Tool,” at
https://revenuedata.doi.gov/query-data/?dataType=Disbursements; and National Park Service (NPS) budget
justifications for FY2011-FY2023, available at https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/budget.htm.
Notes: CPSs = coastal political subdivisions; LWCF = Land and Water Conservation Fund; GOMESA = Gulf of Mexico Energy
Security Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. §1331 note). Dollar amounts are nominal (not adjusted for inflation). GOMESA Phase II revenues are
first reflected in FY2018 payments. The figures reflect budget sequestration. Totals may not sum precisely due to rounding.
a. T
he first payments of GOMESA revenues occurred in 2009. Under GOMESA Section 105(c), revenues are disbursed to the
states and the LWCF state grant program in the fiscal year following their receipt.
b. R evenue disbursements for each state include disbursements to the coastal political subdivisions (CPSs) of each state.
c. A mounts correspond with the year revenues were shown in the NPS budget.
These revenues are important today and will continue to be a critically important piece
of the energy and economic story in the United States.
Historically, the offshore oil and gas industry has been an important revenue generator
for federal, state, and local governments. Between 2000 and 2018, more than $120 billion
in high bids, royalties and rents were paid to government entities73. A portion of these
revenues flow into key conservation programs, such as the Land & Water Conservation
Fund (LWCF), which is funded entirely by offshore oil and gas production, and beginning
in 2021, certain provisions established in the recent Great American Outdoors Acts for
national park maintenance.
The National Park Service award of a $750,000 grant to Philadelphia Parks and
Recreation to revitalize Mifflin Square Park is one of many examples of how revenue that
comes directly from offshore oil and gas operations provides healthy outdoor spaces
for inner city residents. Funded through the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership
Program, the rejuvenated Southeast Philadelphia park provides a neighborhood of
more than 13,500 people an exceptional new playground and space for community
gatherings, recreation, and athletics.
72. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46195
73. https://revenuedata.doi.gov/
explore/?dataType=Revenue&location=NF&mapLevel=State&offshoreRegions=true&period=Fiscal%20Year&year=2019
On July 29, 2022, Interior announced that it will distribute another $192 million as part
of this program. According to Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, “The Outdoor Recreation
Legacy Partnership program is essential to expand our communities’ connections
to urban green spaces, where children can play, families can connect, and a love and
appreciation for the outdoors can be nurtured. The funding and programmatic changes
we are announcing today will allow for us to support bigger ideas and more communities
in their pursuit of creating more parks and places to get outside for every American.” 75
These parks provide a community oasis, offering outdoor spaces for the enjoyment of
inner-city residents, especially children.
Further, in April 2022, Interior disbursed more than $250 million for coastal conservation
and other programs, commenting, “Today’s action represents the second-largest
disbursement since Interior first began disbursing GOMESA revenues to states and
their [coastal political subdivisions (CPS)] in 2009. Since GOMESA’s passage, the
Interior Department has disbursed over $1.26 billion to the coastal states and their
CPS.” 76 These are critical revenues for vital climate resiliency and adaptation programs.
Revenues shared with Gulf Coast states through GOMESA are used by state and local
governments for a host of vital programs, including wetlands preservation, coastal
restoration, flood prevention and hurricane mitigation.77 GOMESA is used to fund the
response and resiliency of coastal states like Louisiana to impacts from climate change.
74. https://www.tapinto.net/towns/newark/sections/central-ward/articles/newark-receives-federal-grant-to-
complete-jessie
75. https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-announces-192-million-create-public-parks-expand-recreation
76. https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-disburses-over-252-million-gulf-states-supporting-coastal
77. https://www.boem.gov/oil-gas-energy/energy-economics/gulf-mexico-energy-security-act-gomesa
There is no linear process for addressing climate change. Achieving our goals requires
the advancement of principles of innovation, conservation, efficiency, resiliency,
mitigation, and adaptation as part of a systematic, global approach.
This fact is well understood by the offshore energy industry and has been
demonstrated through a track record of innovation and technological advancement
that is solving energy challenges, increasing efficiency, and reducing emissions. Not
only do we help solve energy and climate problems, we scale and deploy real-world
solutions. Whether it is the buildout of new offshore wind projects, developing CO2
storage facilities, finding new ways to produce hydrogen, or optimizing logistics and
operations to reduce our carbon footprint, the offshore energy industry is at the
forefront of empowering energy solutions and emission reductions.
The offshore sector is continuously finding ways to shrink its already small
environmental footprint by introducing technologies and innovations that can benefit
other sectors as well. Whether it is a traditionally oil-and-gas focused multi-billion
dollar company investing in offshore wind equipment manufacturing and building
renewable energy incubators, or the deployment of electric remotely operated vehicles
(ROVs) that were developed for the oil and gas industry and now being used to monitor
offshore wind facilities, or the incorporation of virtual and augmented reality into
worker training to reduce risk, the offshore oil and gas industry is driving efficiency and
reducing emissions in ways that will strengthen and accelerate the energy transition.
78. https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2019/09/11/no_need_for_energy_poverty_110474.html
The offshore oil and gas industry helped build the first U.S. offshore wind farm
offshore Block Island, Rhode Island, and is involved in other wind projects up and
down the Atlantic Coast. Block Island showed that the synergy between offshore
oil and gas and wind expedites renewables development. Removing or restricting
investment opportunities for the offshore oil and gas sector would eliminate a key
source of engineering expertise, not to mention RD&D funding that can find, scale,
and deploy the solutions to many of the technical challenges currently associated with
decarbonization efforts.
In the report, The Role of Oil and Gas Companies in the Energy Transition, Robert
Johnston, Reed Blakemore, and Randolph Bell acknowledge the importance
of oil and gas companies in both supplying traditional fuels and in leading in
decarbonization efforts.
[O]il and gas remain an important part of the energy mix, especially in developing
regions. The International Energy Agency’s Sustainable Development Scenario
(SDS) and the Shell Sky Scenario—both aggressive decarbonization forecasts—
show an ongoing, long-term role for oil and gas, even while demand levels are
reduced from where they stand today. In the United States, India, and China—the
three largest greenhouse gas emitters—natural gas in particular has the potential
to remain an integral component of the low carbon energy transition for decades
to come, depending on the policy mechanisms and technologies in place.79
The authors highlight the proactive approach being taken by oil and gas companies to
contribute the emissions reductions efforts:
79. Johnston, Blakemore, and Bell, The Role of Oil and Gas Companies in the Energy Transition, The Atlantic Council, January
2020, at page 1.
Companies across the offshore oil and gas supply chain are making investments and
directly participating in decarbonization efforts such as carbon capture and storage,
geothermal, hydrogen, and deployment of technologies in operations that reduce
emissions. This industry is a key funder of zero- and low-carbon energy development
and deployment. The future success of decarbonization efforts depends upon
continued revenue generation from companies in the oil and gas sector.
Dan Romito, Consulting Partner at Pickering Energy Partners, believes the role of oil and
gas companies is critical to green innovation: “These companies are active sponsors of
the green revolution and are responsible for a substantial proportion of functional green
technology.”81 Romito’s conclusion is based upon research conducted by academics
from Harvard, the University of Texas, and DePaul University who found that that “oil,
gas, and energy-producing firms…are key innovators in the United States’ green patent
landscape.”82
The success of a low-carbon future depends on the success of all energy industry
sectors. Bringing to bear its long history of innovation and ingenuity, the offshore
energy industry is poised to drive the energy transformation and develop and
deploy global decarbonization technologies. According to Romito, “The expertise
housing decarbonization implementation lies within the fossil fuel industry. Without
their participation, the successful execution of the energy transition is more of a
pipe dream.”83
80. Johnston, Blakemore, and Bell, The Role of Oil and Gas Companies in the Energy Transition, The Atlantic Council, January
2020, at page 1.
81. Romito, Accelerating the Energy Transition Requires Bridge Building, Pickering Energy Partners, September 2022 [emphasis
in original].
82. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3718682
83. Romito, Accelerating the Energy Transition Requires Bridge Building, Pickering Energy Partners, September 2022.
The U.S. domestic energy policy helps determine the level of activity in the Gulf of
Mexico, but regardless of the amount of exploration and development in U.S. coastal
waters, other countries will continue to offer rights to explore, develop, and produce
offshore oil and gas. Restricting production in the Gulf of Mexico will not end the
production of oil; however, limiting opportunities at home will shift production to
countries like Russia, China, and Iran.
An example of this can be seen right across the waters of the Gulf of Mexico. As a
consequence of limited opportunities in the U.S. offshore region, investment has
shifted to the Mexican sector. Mexico is producing oil and gas adjacent to state and
federal waters belonging to the United States. The map below shows how Mexico has
outpaced the U.S. in Gulf of Mexico oil and gas leasing opportunities, surpassing the
U.S. in total acres under the lease [FIGURE 15].
But it goes well beyond Mexico. The U.S. and world need oil and gas, and the clear
choice should be in producing this energy here at home, in U.S. waters. The Russian
invasion of Ukraine has shined the spotlight on the critical link between energy security
and national security. Every barrel of oil that the American women and men of the Gulf
of Mexico produce is a barrel that our nation and our allies do not have to import from
countries like Russia, Iran, or China. Abandoning the Gulf of Mexico reduces American
energy security, locks away low-emissions development, increases the cost of energy,
and outsources American jobs and investment to pollution havens.
The extraordinary growth in U.S. oil and gas production is a geopolitical and
economic asset for the U.S. that contributes to global energy security. As the
domestic oil-and-gas industry continues to rebound from the spring 2020
price collapse caused by the onset of Covid, the U.S. is again the world’s top oil
producer—almost 20% above the other two largest producers, Saudi Arabia and
Russia—and the world’s top natural-gas producer. The global oil market, which
was drowning in oversupply less than two years ago, has tightened dramatically
as the world emerges from Covid shutdowns. That makes the market vulnerable
to crisis. Russia’s push on Ukraine, a rebounding global economy, major weather
events, or a surprise event could send prices soaring.84
84. Yergin, “America Takes Pole Position on Oil and Gas,” Wall Street Journal, February 14, 2022.
This point was highlighted by Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff during a Congressional hearing, “An energy independent [U.S.] and net exporter
of energy as a nation has the potential to change the security environment around the
world — notably in Europe and the Middle East.”85 This is eminently apparent today in the
wake of Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine and the associated consequences of
Russia’s using energy as a geopolitical tool.
85. General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, House Subcommittee on Defense Appropriations
Hearing, 2014
Offshore wind projects are vital to the economic growth of this country and efforts
to meet climate goals for the 21st century and beyond. According to analysis by the
American Clean Power Association, we have an over $120 billion market off America’s
While the development of U.S. wind opportunities will provide substantial benefits
to the states adjacent to lease areas, it will also lead to tremendous investment
throughout the nation. In areas like the Gulf Coast, you will find steel fabricators,
offshore service vessels, heavy lift vessel operators, subsea construction companies,
helicopter service providers and more who built their experience in the oil and gas
industry but will be vital in building offshore wind. A generation of Louisianan, Texan, and
other Gulf Coastal marine, oil and gas service companies have already begun applying
their skills and experience to building a new renewable American energy industry in
offshore wind.
The U.S. is also taking steps to become a floating wind leader. Due to its deep water
depths, Pacific Coast projects will require floating wind farms to tap their wind
resources. Floating wind technology is still young, despite the expectation that most
future offshore wind resources could well be located in deepwater. Two-thirds of
America’s offshore wind energy potential, including along the Pacific Coast and in
the Gulf of Maine, are in deepwater areas. While the world’s first floating wind farm,
Equinor’s Hywind Scotland offshore Scotland, began operations in 2017, more are in
the global pipeline and this presents an advantageous opportunity for the American
market. The U.S. federal government is pursuing a “Floating Offshore Wind Shot”
project, to accelerate breakthroughs across engineering, manufacturing, and other
innovation areas.
U.S. oil and gas companies active in the Gulf of Mexico can deliver the engineering
expertise developed through floating projects over the past several decades in support
of the offshore wind floating market, and many are already playing such a role. By being
in the floating wind game sooner rather than later, the American offshore wind sector is
in a strong position to be a global leader.
What is CCS?: As its name suggests, CCS involves the capture of CO2 from either large
point sources – including power generation or industrial facilities – or directly from
the atmosphere. The captured CO2 is then compressed and transported to either be
injected into deep geological formations which permanently trap the CO2 or is used
in a range of applications. CCS uses a robust supply chain and combines various
Capture: Through CCS, CO2 is captured from industrial processes by separating the CO2
from other gas within the stream of emissions. There are four methods for separating
CO2 from other gas during industrial processes, including absorption, adsorption,
membranes, and cryogenic processes. The oil and gas industry has extensive
experience in separating CO2 from hydrocarbons and is uniquely positioned to deploy
capture technologies. The Gulf Coast with its network of industrial centers and facilities
presents a significant opportunity for carbon capture.
Transport: Once captured, it will generally be necessary to transport the CO2 to the
location where the CO2 will either be stored or used. Pipelines are recognized to be
the most cost-effective means for transporting CO2. Prior to shipment by pipeline,
the CO2 is converted into a fluid so that the CO2 can be pumped like other liquids for
ease of transportation. Other methods of transportation include railcars, trucks, ships,
and barges. The Gulf Coast with its robust network of pipelines and energy transport
expertise is well situated for the transport of CO2 for use or storage.
Use: While the prevalent application of CCS may be permanent storage, there are
other valuable commercial uses for CO2. This includes the application of technologies
to convert CO2 into products like fuels, chemicals, and materials. This is accomplished
through chemical reactions or biological conversions such as thermochemical CO2
conversion, electrochemical and photochemical CO2 conversion, carbon mineralization
of CO2, and biological CO2 use. The conversion of CO2 to useful products presents
a tremendous technological opportunity for future maturation and growth. Also, a
common application for CCS today is for enhancing oil recovery (EOR) by injecting
CO2 into oil-bearing reservoirs for increasing oil production. Some of the injected CO2
remains trapped—or stored—within the formation, while some of the CO2 is recovered
with the produced oil and reinjected into the same formation for storage. EO
Storage: CO2 storage involves the injection of CO2 into subsurface geologic formations
either onshore or offshore. Subsurface geologic formations must have sufficient pore
space to hold CO2 (defined as porosity) in commercial quantities, as well as pathways
within the pore space (defined as permeability) so that the CO2 can be injected
throughout the storage reservoir. This is known as porosity and permeability. The
formation must also have a seal of non-porous, impermeable rock to prevent the CO2
from escaping the formation. Finally, the formations must be at the appropriate depths
to ensure effective and efficient storage. The Gulf of Mexico, in waters under both
See https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-co2-storage
The U.S. currently stands as a global leader in CCS, with 10 of the 19 worldwide projects
operating and located in the U.S. in 2019. While most projects to date have included an
EOR component, the U.S. is well-positioned to lead in CO2 storage as well. According to
the National Petroleum Council, the U.S. has become a world leader in CCS by:
As it relates specifically to the offshore, the NPC concluded that “One of the largest
opportunities for saline formation storage in the United States can be found in federal
waters, particularly in the Gulf of Mexico.” Meeting the Dual Challenge, p. 27. This is also
true as it pertains to state waters along the Gulf Coast.
The technical and commercial feasibility of large offshore storage projects is being
proven on the global stage. The first large-scale CO2 capture and injection project with
The U.S. Gulf of Mexico offshore region provides tremendous advantages for an
emerging U.S. CCS sector. The Gulf of Mexico is characterized by vast geologic
prospects for CO2 storage, extensive and established energy infrastructure along the
Gulf Coast and throughout the outer continental shelf, a proximity to industrial centers
for capturing emissions, and an assessable engineering and energy knowledge base and
workforce, along with associated RD&D capabilities.
The Gulf Coast region is distinctly situated to emerge as a global hub for CCS. The
Gulf Coast is home to the full supply chain of energy companies with the engineering
experience, expertise, and vision to deploy CCS projects with the scale and efficiency
necessary for success. As with any capital-intensive industry, the U.S. CCS sector
requires certainty and predictability in the regulatory system, both at the state and
federal level. Improvements must be made in U.S. laws and regulations to foster growth
and enable success in U.S. CCS. Federal policy requires a new level of urgency for
permitting of energy projects like offshore CCS. Otherwise, we will lose out on the
investments and the chance to emerge as a global leader in new energy solutions.
Energy affordability is fundamentally and directly tied to the supply and demand of
energy sources. The offshore sector will be a key part of the solution for near- and
long-term affordability of oil, natural gas, and other energy sources for decades to
come. Furthermore, the diverse ecosystem of companies that team up to produce low
carbon barrels of oil from the Gulf of Mexico continues to innovate incredible solutions
for addressing the climate challenge. Emerging segments such as offshore wind
and carbon capture and storage can supercharge our nation’s response to meeting
ambitious climate change emissions targets.
The Washington Post Editorial Board sums up the reason for continuing investment in
our offshore oil and gas sector86:
We have long supported opening more U.S. waters to offshore drilling. As long as
the economy requires oil, it must come from somewhere, and better the United
86. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/is-ryan-zinke-cynical-or-incompetent/2018/01/24/80055fd0-0146-11e8-
8acf-ad2991367d9d_story.html
We need to look no further than the U.S. Gulf of Mexico to achieve our national policy
goals. However, the U.S. offshore competes with other regions throughout the world for
investment in energy producing projects. Historically, the U.S. has been able to compete
effectively under its statutory and regulatory framework. However, that certainty and
predictability has continued to erode due to bureaucratic red tape and a continued
barrage of lawsuits against U.S. projects. We must work together to advance real-world
solutions that unlock affordable, reliable, and environmentally responsible energy while
bringing low and zero carbon technologies and energy to reality. Whether it is offshore
oil and gas, offshore wind, or offshore CCS, the federal government must provide a
pathway for investment through certainty in leasing, permitting, and regulation. Failure
to do so will not prevent the investment, it will only prevent the investment from
occurring in here in the U.S.
EXMAR Offshore
Specializing in the engineering, design,
construction, installation and operation of
semisubmersible production platforms in the
Gulf of Mexico and offshore infrastructure
throughout the world
bp
An integrated producer of resilient
hydrocarbons in deepwater Gulf of Mexico
at a lower cost and with fewer emissions
MSRC
The largest oil spill removal organization
(OSRO) in the United States consistently
provides reliable, effective oil spill response
Quality Companies
A portfolio of top-tier oil and gas product Quality Production Management. We provide premier
operation management services within the continental
and service companies Internationally
United States. Our production operation management
recognized for offshore and onshore division offers contract operations services, incorporating
construction, fabrication and electrical and all land operations and logistics coordination. Our services
instrumentation with a global reach include contract operations, supplemental labor, E&I/
electrical/compliance technicians, deepwater/shelf/state
water/land operations, plant/pipeline operations, and
contract/supplemental transport.
Safety Mindset
At Quality Companies, the health and safety of our
employees, and protection of the environment is a core
value to us. We promote a Target Zero mindset, with
a strong focus on customer satisfaction and quality
performance throughout the company. We promote a
Quality Companies is a consortium of premier oil strong Stop Work Authority (SWA) Program designed
and gas product and service companies strategically to empower all employees and contract workers with
located throughout the Gulf Coast region and beyond. the responsibility and obligation to cease work when
Five industry-leading entities make up the Quality an unsafe condition or behavior is observed. As part of
Companies family: our concerted effort to improve and maintain safety in
all we do, Quality Companies received recognition from
Quality Construction & Production. Quality Companies American Equity Underwriters Inc. (AEU) as a 2022 AEU
leads the way in onshore and offshore fabrication, Safety Award winner.
construction, and maintenance with highly skilled
personnel and quality service offerings for the domestic
Support for NOIA
and international oil and gas industry. When it comes
Quality Companies is proud to be a NOIA member and
to construction, production, and maintenance, Quality
supports the industry organization in its efforts to
Companies offers the finest along the Gulf Coast, with
strengthen the oil and gas industry’s presence in the
specializations in composite wrap, blasting & painting,
Gulf of Mexico.
scaffolding, production and mechanical services,
and equipment.
Oceaneering
Global technology company delivering We deliver cost efficient, safe, and low-carbon solutions,
from survey operations to the design and manufacture of
engineered services and products to the
dynamic inter array cables, cable repair support, and route
energy, defense, aerospace, manufacturing, clearance and preparation.
logistics, and entertainment industries
Innovation
Oceaneering has been committed to the Gulf of Mexico We are powering the energy transition with advancements
(GoM) since its founding nearly 60 years ago. We serve our including our autonomous Freedom™ AUV for site
GoM customers with facilities in Houston, Morgan City investigations, high-speed Isurus™ ROV for operating in
and Port Fourchon, Louisiana, and Panama City, Florida. harsh current conditions, our Integrated IMR offering,
cost- and carbon-reducing suction anchors, and Ocean
Serving GoM renewable energy market Perception™ marine mammal monitoring software. Our
With a decade of experience in renewables, we leverage recent collaboration with Kontiki Winds will enable us to
our fleet of Jones Act-compliant vessels and work class support the electrification of offshore assets and island
ROVs to serve our customers’ complex challenges. states using floating wind.
PUBLISHED BY
The National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA) members are leading the
development and deployment of climate change solutions and GHG emission
reductions. From responsibly developed oil and gas in the Gulf of Mexico to rising
offshore wind to emerging energy segments, such as carbon capture and storage,
NOIA members are transforming the global energy landscape.
Through initiatives like the NOIA Environmental, Social & Governance Network, NOIA
unites the interests of the entire offshore energy ecosystem.
We encourage you to join NOIA today. Together, our voice will successfully promote
the durable energy solutions so vital for lifting society in a safe and environmentally
sustainable way.
2305CP_NOIA.indd
2304OFF_NOIA.indd 4 1 4/28/23
3/20/23 6:09
5:33 PM
PM