Fascism in Italy
Fascism in Italy
Fascism in Italy
national unity and strong leadership. In Italy, Benito Mussolini used his charisma
to establish a powerful fascist state.
Benito Mussolini coined the term “fascism” in 1919 to describe his political movement.
He adopted the ancient Roman fasces as his symbol. This was a bundle of rods tied
around an ax, which represented the power of Rome.
Mussolini established the first fascist regime, followed soon after by others, including
Nazi Germany. Fascism, however, differed somewhat from one nation to another. Thus,
scholars often disagree on a precise definition of fascism. Even so, they tend to agree
on its common characteristics such as:
In Italy, Mussolini led the way to fascism. Born on July 29, 1883, in
small-town southern Italy to a blacksmith father and a schoolteacher
mother, he grew up on his socialist father’s stories of nationalism and
political heroism. Shy and socially awkward, he ran into trouble at an
early age due to his intransigence and violence against his classmates.
As a young adult, he moved to Switzerland and became an avowed
socialist. Eventually, he made his way back to Italy and established
himself as a socialist journalist.
When war broke out across Europe in 1914, Italy at first remained
neutral. Mussolini wanted Italy to join the war—putting him at odds
with the Italian Socialist Party, which expelled him due to his pro-war
advocacy. In response, he formed his own political movement, the
Fasces of Revolutionary Action, aimed at encouraging entry into the
war. (Italy eventually joined the fray in 1915.)
The fighting in northern Italy had shaped the Fascist movement in four
ways:
The fighting nourished the Fascists’ belief in violence as the true path to
manhood.
It became clear that Socialism was one of Fascism’s main political enemies.
The Fascists saw that the liberal state was weak and vulnerable to challenge.
The Fascists learned that paramilitary violence was an effective political tool.
Finally, the outcome of the campaign affirmed the Fascist view that, at the
end of the day, violent struggle led to power.
By 1922, with these experiences behind them, Mussolini and his
followers liked their chances of taking over Italy. Fascist squads
racked up wins as they marched through the provinces crushing
socialists, intimidating liberals, and deposing agents of the state.
Following a series of planned demonstrations known as the “March on
Rome”, Mussolini was named Prime Minister by the King of Italy.
Everything seemed to be falling into place for a Fascist revolution.
They would destroy their political opponents and, under Mussolini’s
leadership, create a totalitarian state.
Or so they thought.
Fascists in power
The Fascists craved revolution and total power, but instead found they
had to cooperate with different, mostly conservative political parties.
The Fascist party wanted to crush the existing 'liberal' rulers, but
Mussolini allowed many officials to continue working for the state. That
meant they could hinder the Fascist agenda, if they wanted. One-party
rule seemed beyond their grasp.
n 1921, Mussolini won a seat in parliament and was even invited to join
the coalition government by Italy’s Prime Minister Giovanni Giolitti—
who assumed that Mussolini would bring his Blackshirts to heel once he
was given a share of the political power.
But Giolitti had misjudged Mussolini, who instead intended to use his
Blackshirts to seize absolute control. In late 1921, Mussolini
transformed the group into the National Fascist Party, translating a
movement that had numbered about 30,000 in 1920 into a political
party 320,000 members strong. Although he had effectively declared
war against the state, the Italian government was powerless to dissolve
the party and stood by as fascists took over most of northern Italy.
In protest, Facta and his cabinet resigned the morning of October 28.
Armed with a telegram from the king inviting him to form a cabinet,
Mussolini boarded a sleeper car and took a leisurely, 14-hour journey
from Milan to Rome. On October 30, he became prime minister—and
ordered his men to parade before the king’s residence as they left the
city.
Still, Fascism in Italy was not without racism. Mussolini's war against
Ethiopia in 1935 brought race into focus as a Fascist concern.
Fascists portrayed the war as Italy's "civilizing mission" or the need for
"military security". But deep-seated attitudes about racial hierarchy
played out during the conflict. Advanced, deadly weapons, including
the use of gas by the Italian Army, made the fight pretty one-sided.
Italians convinced themselves that this firepower made them superior
to their Ethiopian victims. After local resistance was crushed,
Mussolini's regime established a tight grip over the region. Italian rule
included segregation, and policies prohibited interracial relations. This
policy extended not only to sexual relations and marriage, but to any
kind of social relationship at all. Step-by-step, Ethiopia became a state
governed by a regime without moral or political constraints. There
were no bureaucrats to rein in the Fascists. Thus unlike minorities in
Italy, Ethiopians were viewed by most Fascists as barbaric "others"
who could never become Italian.
.
Over the years, Mussolini increased his own power while chipping away
at the population’s civil rights and forming a propagandistic police
state. His agenda also went beyond domestic affairs. Mussolini’s
imperial ambitions led Italy to occupy the Greek island of Corfu, invade
Ethiopia, and ally itself with Nazi Germany, eventually resulting in the
murder of 8,500 Italians in the Holocaust.
Mussolini’s appointment as prime minister in October 1922 did not see the
immediate institution of dictatorial rule. Characteristic of the means the Fascists
had employed to come to power, Blackshirt squad violence helped to reduce the
influence of parliamentary opposition without outlawing it altogether. From the
start of 1925, a fascist parliamentary majority (elected in April 1924 partly thanks
to fascist intimidation) was able to pass a series of laws which dismantled the
institutions of liberal democracy. Denoting a decline in squad power, the regular
police forces together with the OVRA secret police (created in 1927) were now
entrusted with the task of rooting out political opposition and controlling the
population, with the assistance of Fascist Party organizations (including the
Militia). From 1926, the police benefited from enhanced powers which made
them less accountable for their actions. Italian citizens were monitored more
frequently than in the past, and could easily fall victim to spies and informers - to
the extent that most began to be careful about what they said in public. However,
the main targets of police oppression belonged to the working classes or
underground opposition parties. Many had been subject to police action under
the previous Liberal state because of their involvement in union militancy or left-
wing politics. Nevertheless, they suffered considerably worse under fascist rule,
with large numbers being sentenced to imprisonment or confino (exile in a
remote part of the country or penal colony). Government-supporting middle class
citizens were less likely to fall foul of the fascist police state. When relatively
harmless criticism of the regime on the part of such individuals reached the
authorities, their good social standing, and clean criminal and political records,
could count in their favour.
In its efforts to ‘nationalize’ the Italian masses, fascism applied the imagery and
metaphors of war to economic production, as evident in highly propagandized,
but largely unsuccessful, ‘battles’ for national autarchy in raw materials and
wheat. Mussolini claimed to cater to the needs of workers while rejecting
socialism, according to the principle, enshrined in the Fascist Charter of Labour of
1927, that previous conflict between bosses and employees was now overcome
as both became ‘producers’ for the nation. The implementation during the 1930s
of the ‘Corporate State’, consisting of representative bodies of employers and
employees for each sector of the economy, only superficially reflected this. In
practice, the regime favoured employers over workers. In the wake of the
economic depression of the 1930s, big business benefited from the state’s
intervention to save failing companies and fascism’s preparation for long-term
warfare and occupation of foreign territory. In spite of state welfare measures,
large numbers of workers and their families saw a decline in living standards.
Fascist unions did little to protect them against wage cuts and sackings. While
propaganda exalted rural life, the regime’s economic policies impoverished the
peasant masses in particular.
Education
Citizens living in fascist Italy spent much of their free time engaged in pursuits
that were no different to those undertaken in other Western nations. Yet, most
were in some way affected by the regime’s attempt to exercise control over
leisure activities (partly in competition with the Catholic Church). As illustrated
above, for children and teenagers, organized leisure activities and education
were hardly separable. By contrast, the activities of company after-work clubs
(overseen by the Opera Nazionale Dopolavoro) were less focused on ideological
instruction. Such clubs partly catered to welfare and consumer needs, by offering
their members household goods and entertainment at discount prices. We
should consider mass leisure in the broader cultural context in which the state
censored news and banned all direct criticism of fascism, but did not attempt to
have the content of literary texts, theatrical productions or commercial films
excessively ‘fascistized’, at least until the late 1930s. However, fascist newsreels
and documentaries were screened at cinemas. Moreover, in the public sphere,
large numbers of citizens were obliged to participate in state-organized
spectacular rituals (ceremonies, parades, etc.) which aimed to mould a patriotic
and martial spirit. Yet, it is questionable how deeply felt such participation was,
particularly among the adult population, given the environment in which, above
all, shows of commitment were essential for getting by.
The rise of fascism was partly a consequence of fears about the power and
status of men in a world in which gender roles no longer appeared distinct.
Mussolini wanted women to return to their traditionally subservient positions as
wives and mothers in correspondence to his demographic campaign to increase
the birth rate, which would in turn justify colonial expansion. This involved limiting
female employment and encouraging marriage (as evident in the introduction of a
bachelor tax), restricting the availability of contraceptives, and increasing the
severity of prison sentences for illegal abortions. In spite of the parading of the
nation’s most prolific mothers at official ceremonies, the ‘battle for births’ did not
succeed in halting a long-term demographic decline. This partly reflected
fascism’s inability to inhibit female impulses for emancipation. Moreover, in its
desire not to lose consensus among the middle classes, the regime itself was
unwilling to enforce an extensive ban on women’s employment and their access
to university and the professions. However, in the sexual and family sphere,
fascism reinforced traditional mores to the point of oppressing individuals who did
not conform. This explains the persecution of homosexuals, particularly among
men, many of whom were sentenced to confino. It also explains the double
standards exercised to the benefit of men and detriment of women in the state’s
treatment of adultery.
Although the impact of fascist rule on Italian society varied according to the
regime’s policies towards specific classes or groups, arguably, the most dramatic
consequences revealed themselves to the Italian populace as a whole during the
latter years of the dictatorship. The intensification of policies aiming to ‘fascistize’
society and enhance its warrior ‘qualities’, was marked by political and strategic
alignment with Hitler’s Germany, as well as the ostracism in 1938 of Italian Jews
(many of whom, ironically, had been enthusiastic fascist supporters) from
mainstream Italian society, accompanied by a vicious anti-Semitic propaganda
campaign. In a similar vein, Italy’s intervention in the Spanish Civil War in
support of Francisco Franco’s Nationalists amounted to an ideological war, which,
unlike the invasion of Ethiopia in 1935, demanded human sacrifice but offered no
territorial reward. During the Second World War, a series of military defeats and
the collapse of the economy laid bare the hollowness of propaganda stressing
Italy’s invincibility. While large numbers of Italians celebrated Mussolini’s
consequent fall from power in July 1943, the nastier side of fascism manifested
itself in the Italian Social Republic (1943-45), set up under the control of the
Nazis, who had occupied Italy after their former ally surrendered to Anglo-
American forces in September 1943. Many adherents to the Social Republic,
believing that the previous fascist regime had not been radical enough, aimed to
resurrect the violent revolutionary fascism of the earlier movement, which had
preceded Mussolini’s rise to power in 1922. This partly accounts for the
Republic’s ruthless repression of anti-fascists and partisans, as well as its
complicity with the Nazis in deporting Jews to death camps. Italian collective
memory underlines the human suffering caused by Mussolini’s ill-fated alliance
with Nazi Germany. However, reflecting the varying impacts of fascism
discussed in this essay, Italians are more divided on the question of how life was
under the rule of Mussolini before the Second World War.