Paper 2 Variant 1 Mark Scheme
Paper 2 Variant 1 Mark Scheme
Paper 2 Variant 1 Mark Scheme
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2019 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however, the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
You are Sumitra, the tutor at Stan’s creative writing class. After the
class today, you write a journal entry.
Base your journal entry on what you have read in Passage A, but be
careful to use your own words. Address each of the three bullet points.
Begin your journal entry: ‘My first lesson today has given me a lot to
think about ’
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 1 (Table A, Reading and Table B
Writing)
General notes
Candidates should select ideas from the passage (see below) and
develop them relevantly, supporting what they write with details from
the passage and judging the appropriate register for the genre which is a
journal entry. Look for a clear and balanced response which covers the
three areas of the question, is well sequenced, and is
in the candidate’s own words.
A1: Describe your first impressions of the new students based on the
introductions they gave while in the circle
• shared reasons for coming to the class (det. on arrival) [dev. useful to
learn names, get to know each other]
• writing limericks (det. five-line poem, Stan’s giggling) [dev. wanted to
keep it easy for the benefit of any nervous students, build confidence
with something straightforward, pleased to see Stan enjoying himself at
first]
• reading out limericks (rest of group) (det. didn’t force anyone to read,
Stan/Robin didn’t read) [dev. didn’t want any students to feel under too
much pressure]
• Myfanwy reading her limerick enthusiastically (det. others applauded
her) [dev. (not as) good (as she thought it was); demoralising for less
confident students]
• accident at breaktime (det. Robin dropped the teapot, splashed hot
tea) [dev. worried she might have been seriously hurt; (over) dramatic
reaction, Robin feeling responsible]
• class discussion about poetry/talked about free verse (det. Stan
enjoyed debate) [dev. pleased, Myfanwy now less dominant]
A3: Consider your plans for the next lesson and how you will manage
the class and the students
Table A, Reading:
Use the following table to give a mark out of 15 for Reading.
2 • The response is either very general, with little reference to the passage, or a 1–3
reproduction of sections of the original.
• Content is either insubstantial or unselective.
• There is little realisation of the need to modify material from the passage.
General notes
The notes on pages 10 and 11 are a guide to what good responses might
say about the selections, along with possible overviews which may be
offered for each paragraph. Alternative acceptable explanations should
be credited.
Candidates can make any sensible comment, but only credit those that
are relevant to the correct meanings of the words in the context.
Mark holistically for the overall quality of the response, not for the number
of words chosen for discussion, bearing in mind that there should be a
range of choices to demonstrate an understanding of how language
works for the higher bands, and that this should include the ability to
explain images.
The general effect is that Stan remembers the shame of his failure to
succeed in English when younger.
• stern face presiding over ranks of desks (image): remembers
the serious expression of teacher, authoritarian, military leader,
rows of soldiers, power, control, stifling creativity, Stan’s
fear/vulnerability
• pulled (young Stan) to attention: got his complete and total
focus, military command, suggesting speed with which Stan
reacts
• (completely) obliterate: annihilate, utterly destroy, Stan’s terror.
• unworthy existence: doesn’t deserve to live, little merit
• (like) an army cadet’s besmirched tunic buttons (image):
ashamed of poor results, unfit for military parade, exposed to the
derision of others and/or anger of his elders/superiors
• emblematic (of deep failure and shame): signalling his lack of
success for all to see, symbol of disgrace
• underline: emphasises, drawing attention to, shows up his error
• demotion to an even lesser division (image): relegate, he will
be dropped to a lower class/position; draws attention to his
shame
• contorted: twisted (in an ugly way); malice, derision, cruelty of
former teacher
• triumphant smirk: victorious, smug smile, teacher takes
pleasure in Stan’s lack of success
• poured over him like hot coals (image): words caused
emotional anguish, physical burning pain, causes deep scarring
6 • Wide ranging discussion of judiciously selected language with some high 9–10
quality comments that add meaning and associations to words/phrases in
both parts of the question, and demonstrate the writer's reasons for using
them.
• Tackles imagery with some precision and imagination.
• There is clear evidence that the candidate understands how language
works.
3 • The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that 3–4
communicate less well.
• The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but not explain why
they are used.
• Explanations may be few, general, slight or only partially effective.
• They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to specific
words.
You must use continuous writing (not note form) and use your own
words as far as possible.
General notes
Table A, Reading:
Use the following table to give a mark out of 15 for Reading.
0 • No creditable content. 0
Table B, Writing:
Use the following table to give a mark out of 5 for Writing.
3 • A relevant response that is expressed clearly, fluently and mostly with 4–5
concision.
• The response is well organised.
• The response is in the candidate’s own words (where appropriate), using a
range of well-chosen vocabulary which clarifies meaning.
• Spelling, punctuation and grammar are almost always accurate.
2 • A relevant response that is generally expressed clearly, with some evidence 2–3
of concision.
• There may be some lapses in organisation.
• The response is mainly expressed in the candidate’s own words (where
appropriate), but there may be reliance on the words of the passage.
• There may be errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar but they do not
impede communication.
0 • No creditable content. 0