1 s2.0 S2352710222010907 Main
1 s2.0 S2352710222010907 Main
1 s2.0 S2352710222010907 Main
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Biomass ashes can be used in cementitious materials as cement or sand substitution. Nevertheless,
Grinding ashes resulted from the combustion of biomass in generation plants present drawbacks that can
Waste materials reduce their potential use if they are not previously treated. In this research, industrial sugarcane
Biomass ashes bagasse ash (SCBA) was mechanically activated by grinding and its effects evaluated when used
Sugarcane bagasse ash as mineral admixture in cementitious materials. Four different substitution rates (0%, 10%, 20%
Sustainability
and 30%) where used to investigate the influence of the amount of ashes replaced on the dura
Low carbon materials
bility and mechanical performance of mortars and identify the optimal substitution rate. To get a
thorough comprehension, results were also compared to mortars containing untreated ashes. The
combination of a performance-based testing campaign (compressive and flexural strength, open
porosity, apparent density, water capillary absorption, surface electrical resistivity, rapid chloride
migration coefficient) and a set of analytical techniques (XRD, FT-IR, SEM and TGA-DTA) enabled
to characterise the mechanical and durability properties of mortars and identify the mechanisms
behind the results. The research concluded that, at 28 days, the incorporation of ground SCBA
enhances the compressive strength of mortars up to 62%, decreases the porosity of samples by
35%, highly improves the resistance to the diffusion of chlorides by 10 times and improve the
interfacial transition zone by narrowing and closing the gap between aggregates and pastes.
1. Introduction
Nowadays, efforts are put in producing more eco-friendly materials and fostering the circular economy. The research interest lies
on i) the increasing high demand of construction materials to meet the needs of the global growing population, ii) the necessity of
lowering the carbon emissions of construction industry in specific, and of other waste-producers industries and iii) the social
requirement of boosting local resources as a respond to the shortage of raw materials and the consequent increasing in prices.
Building materials and construction sector represents around 11% of all annual global CO2eq emissions. The demand of con
struction materials will double increase in the years to come as a response to the demands of a global growing population with
increasing living standards, and concrete is expected to cover most of the urban development structures. Concrete and cementitious
materials production involves a high environmental impact due to i) the increasing global demand, ii) the high emissions of cement
production (7% of the world’s CO2 emissions [1]), iii) the water demand that the global production entails and iv) the demand of
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: v.torresdesande@2018.ljmu.ac.uk (V. Torres de Sande).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105082
Received 26 April 2022; Received in revised form 30 July 2022; Accepted 2 August 2022
Available online 18 August 2022
2352-7102/© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
natural aggregates which extraction is responsible of severe habitat, territory and infrastructures deteriorations and conflicts [2–4].
The world’s extracted materials usage will double by 2060, overpassing the 167 Gt [5]. Half of share of non-metallic minerals (the
main share of extracted materials) -gravel, sand, clay, limestone, and gypsum, mainly-are used in construction. In parallel, the global
biomass production is expected to increase by 68% and the actual global demand of construction materials will double by 2060,
overpassing the 86 Gt [5]. Moreover, nowadays, the awareness of returning to the use of local available materials is growing in the
population and industry as it poses a strategy to avoid the consequences of raw materials dependency (risks of shortages and market
fluctuations) and to reduce the associated transport environmental impact. This entails an opportunity for the built environment to be
the driving force in the shift towards more sustainable practices. This, along with the fact that fine aggregates substitution is less
investigated, boost and shape this research, that aims to find an outlet for materials that, initially, cannot be used as SCM or cement
substituents.
The environmental impact of construction products can be addressed from two complementary points: the production process and
the service life of the final product (e.g: reinforced concrete (RC) structure). To reduce the environmental impact of the former, efforts
are put in the potential substitution of cement or aggregates by waste materials according to different strategies. These strategies,
commonly simultaneous, investigate novel formulations that ensure the extension of service life of the structure, along with lowering
the carbon emissions. This is the case of some industrial waste (silica fume, SF; fly ash, FA; ground granulated blast furnace, GGBS)
which proved to be beneficial in terms of mechanical and durability performance of concrete and have been already implemented in
the production chain. Nevertheless, there are other industrial waste that can be potentially used in construction materials due to their
physico-chemical characteristics. Such is the case of ashes resulting from the combustion of biomass in energy plants. The high content
in oxides and/or a fineness make biomass ashes attractive to be used as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM). Nevertheless,
industrial biomass ashes may show important drawbacks that limit or hinder their use in cementitious material such as: i) a high
content in organic matter or undesirable particles as contaminants, salts, porous and light particles; ii) an insufficient content of oxides;
iii) a higher water demand due to the increased fineness or higher porosity.
One of these waste is sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) which is the resulting material of the combustion of sugarcane bagasse, the
most cultivated crop in the world, (1,87 billion tonnes per year [6]). On the yield basis, the annual SCBA production is estimated in
48–60 million of tonnes [7] entailing an environmental problem if they are dumped. Traditionally, it has been used as fertilizer,
although the nutrient capacity of ashes has been put into question [8] and its potential risks due to the heavy metal and other con
taminants content highlighted, compromising the use of ashes as fertilizer [9].
SCBA has been investigated as cement replacement since it usually presents proper chemical composition to be used as artificial
pozzolan (high content of amorphous silicon). Nevertheless, the oxides content (SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3, hereafter S-A-F) does not
always fall within the standard threshold of 70% content [10] stablished by BS EN 450–1:2012 [10] for a similar material (coal fly ash
with or without co-combustion materials) already incorporated as pozzolan to be used in concrete. In addition, the quality of industrial
ashes is commonly compromised due to the high temperatures and uncontrolled conditions during the combustion process. Thereupon
industrial SCBA may not exhibit a desirable amorphous portion, loss on ignition (LOI) content and can contain additional contaminants
that compromise the workability, chemical reactions, soundness, and durability of the material.
Much research focused on Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) as a strategy to reduce the emissions of its production. In terms of
mechanical performance has been declared to be 15–20% (weight of cement) for ultra-treated ashes in mortars and concretes [11–13]
and between 5 and 10% for untreated or low-treated ashes [14,15]. The substitution of cement is limited due to the dilution effect
which entails a lower initial hydraulic reactivity due to the absence of cement. Few authors have addressed the use of industrial SCBA
as sand substituent, although the optimal substitution rate does not seem to be clear. Sales and Lima [8] investigated the substitution of
sand by poor-reactive untreated SCBA with different type of cement and found that higher amounts of ashes (20–30% in mortars and
up to 50% in concrete) could be used delivering higher compressive strength values after 28d. Contrary, Modani and Vyawahare [16]
substituted up to 40% of untreated fine aggregates (weight of sand) in concrete and observed that substitution rates, SR, higher than
10% resulted in the reduction in the compressive strength along with the increasing rate of ashes at 28d. The CS loss at 20% SR was
considered negligible in terms of CS and workability. Macedo et al. [17] concluded that 10% of fine aggregates substitution delivered
the highest compressive strength in mortars being 3% the optimal substitution rate if tensile strength is considered. In general, SBCA
benefits the durability performance of cementitious materials regardless the gain or not in the compressive strength [7,13,18–20]. The
variability in the results mainly lies on the wide casuistry used in terms of mix designs, the wide range of characteristics of the raw
material and the processed material.
In this research, industrial SCBA with a portion of oxidising matter (organic carbon) above 5%, a content in oxides (S-A-F) lower
than 70% and a strength activity index below 75% has been used in the production of mortars. These ashes previously demonstrated
that can benefit chlorides penetration resistance of OPC systems when used as mineral admixture substituting fine aggregates [7].
Contrary, the ashes, which were sieved, and the portion retained in the 212 μm sieve removed, dramatically reduced the flowability,
increased the open porosity and diminished the compressive strength at 28 days in comparison to the control samples. A retarded
pozzolanic reaction was observed within the mixes containing SCBA. In the current investigation the effectiveness of the physical and
mineralogical activation by grinding is investigated in an attempt to encounter the potential drawbacks that untreated ashes may
represent. The effectiveness of grinding lies on the increase of fineness of SCBA promoting the filling effect and on the exposition of
more surface area of particles for pozzolanic reaction [21]. Fillers create extra nucleation sites for the formation of more hydration
products. Grinding of supplementary cementitious materials is known to increase the workability and the pozzolanicity and, therefore,
the compressive strength [22,23]. Cordeiro et al. [23] correlated the increase in compressive strength of mortars containing ground
SCBA and the increase in the packing density, and the increase in pozzolanicity (Chapelle activity) and the fineness. Nevertheless,
grinding of sugarcane bagasse seems to not be effective until achieving certain fineness (<60 μm) [19,21,24]. Thus, the benefits of
2
V. Torres de Sande et al.
Table 1
Chemical data of ashes, sand, and cement.
CaO SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 S+A+F MgO K2O TiO2 Na2O MnO Cl−ws SO3
3
Ut-SCBA 13.08 48.08 6.07 5.92 60.07 2.42 2.10 0.55 1.34 0.13 0.18 0.96 12.56 80.7 51%
G-SCBA 13.90 53.17 7.11 6.01 66.29 2.67 2.24 0.525 1.31 0.14 0.24 0.85 12.97 81.2 73%
Sand 0.29 76.45 3.21 0.27 – 0.81 0.70 0.05 – 0.00 – 0.14 – – –
Cement 76.56 18.68 3.25 3.11 25.04 1.82 0.86 0.25 – 0.55 – 2.60 – – –
ws: water soluble, Tot: total content, considered to be the acid soluble content.
Table 2
Physical data of ashes, sand, and cement.
Particle size distribution Real density (kg/m3) Bulk density (kg/m3) SSA (m2/kg)
Fig. 1. Characterisation of Ut-ashes by size. (a) TC, IC, OC and LOI values, (b) Mass retained in sieve sizing 300 μm and (c) mass retained in sieve sizing 63 μm.
Fig. 2. FT-IR of Ut-SCBA. Identification of (1) group carbonate CO23 and (2) vibrations of the bonds Si–O of quartz.
grinding might be hindered by the high presence of crystalline particles (quartz and cristobalite) and carbon content. The crystallinity
if demonstrated to be high, can be counteracted by ultra-grinding leading to more nucleation sites able to form more hydration
products.
In this research four different substitution rates (0%, 10%, 20% and 30%) where used to investigate the influence of the amount
SCBA used as mineral admixture on the durability and mechanical performance of OPC systems (mortars and pastes) and identify the
optimal one. To get a thorough comprehension, results were also compared to mortars containing untreated ashes. The combination of
a performance-based testing campaign (compressive and flexural strength, open porosity, apparent density, water capillary absorp
tion, surface electrical resistivity, rapid chloride migration coefficient) and a set of analytical techniques (XRD, FT-IR, SEM and TGA-
DTA) enabled to characterise the mechanical and durability properties of mortars and identify the mechanisms behind the results.
2.1.2. Untreated sugarcane bagasse ash, Ut-SCBA and ground sugarcane bagasse ash, G-SCBA
Industrial SCBA was collected from the 30Mw San Pedro Bio Energy plant in Dominican Republic. The ashes were the result of the
combustion of bagasse at 750-800 ◦ C. The system used is based on a travelling grate boiler were the resulting ashes of the combustion
of the bagasse is retained in filters. Untreated (Ut-SCBA) and ground ashes (G-SCBA) were used in this research. G-SCBA was obtained
4
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
by using a mortar grinder, model Retsch RM 200 in constant-mass portions until getting D75 ~ 25 μm. The chemical composition and
physical properties of untreated and treated ashes are provided in Tables 1 and 2.
The appearance of Ut-SCBA, with grey colour and black char particles, confirms the uncompleted combustion of the biomass, Fig. 1
(b). This, along with its heterogeneous composition, influence the fresh and hardened properties of mortars. By means of SEM, particles
sized below 212 μm are rich in alumina and silicon, presenting a wide range of shapes. According to the XRD pattern, the 212 μm
portion has a larger hump corresponding to the presence of amorphous compounds [25]. Particles above 300 μm are comprised by
light oval or elongated carbonaceous particles and crystalline CaCO2 and SiO2 (the latter corresponding to particles dragged from the
field during the harvesting the biomass), Fig. 2. The organic carbon (OC) particles presence increases with the increase of particle
sizing, meanwhile the inorganic carbon (IC), in minor presence, decrease, Fig. 1. Therefore, commonly, the portion above 150 μm [26]
is removed as a basic treatment, which, in this research, entails the 18% of the total mass.
The determination of LOI in accordance with BS 196–2 [27], method for testing cement, is widely used in the characterisation of
waste materials that are meant to be used as SCM, since its content is limited by standards as per BS EN 450–1:2012 [10]. In LOI the
carbon dioxide and water are eliminated and any oxidable elements oxidised to some extent. Nevertheless, the use of LOI test has been
put into question since overestimations may occur due to further chemical reactions at different temperatures [9,28]. In this research,
however, it was found that this method is inefficient in completely combusting the carbonaceous particles due to the size and the
pre-carbonation state of particles, therefore is not suitable for testing biomass ashes Fig. 1(a). By using a carbon content analyser and
thermogravimetric analysis with the same range of temperature, the results were 9.97% (OC) and 8.25%, respectively. On the other
hand, the weight loss in the range associated with the carbon decomposition (400◦ C–650 ◦ C) in TG analysis is of 3.42%.
XRD results reveal that the main crystalline phases are quartz (SiO2), calcite (CaCO3), akermanite (Ca2MgSi2O7), mullite (Al
(Al1.272Si0.728O4.864)), moissanite-3C (SiC) and anorthite Ca(Al2Si2O8). Sugarcane bagasse ashes are rich in SiO2 (48.08%), followed by
CaO (13.08%), Al2O3 (6.07%) and Fe2O3 (5.92%), Table 1. The sum of SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3 entails the 60.07%, below the minimum
(70%) required by BS EN 450–1:2012 [10].
All FT-IR spectra showed bands of the group carbonate CO23, in the ranges of 1446 cm− 1 and 882 cm− 1 with higher absorption bands
for portions below 150μ. This corresponds to the presence of calcium carbonate, potentially due to the reaction of calcium hydroxide
with the environmental CO2. Vibrations of the bonds Si–O of the quartz at 1150 cm− 1 were observed in all retained portions but in 600
μm, with higher absorption bands for finer particles that attributed to amorphous silica. Secondary silicon structures are shown at 798
and 670 cm− 1 with higher intensity in the mass retained in sieve 212μ, corresponding to crystalline silica of sand (quartz) as observed
in SEM. In addition, vibrations of the group Al–O might be covered by the presence of silicon in the range of 882 and 928 cm− 1.
Grinding leads to the breakdown of porous and crystalline particles, therefore to the homogenisation of the material. The different
grindability of particles [29] explains the major presence of crystalline particles in bigger sizes, Fig. 3. Grinding additionally increases
the real density until that of sand and rise the SSA by five times similar to that of cement, Table 2. During the morphology investigation
by means of SEM, entrapped particles in porous structures were observed, and might be behind the increase in S + A + F oxides
5
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Table 3
Mortar and pastes mix design.
% Sand Ash
2.2. Methods
The methods used are divided in three subsections as follows:
6
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Table 4
Performance-based tests.
7
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Fig. 6. Hardened apparent density of mortars (a), SEM of Ut20 paste (b) and G20 paste (c) at 28d.
8
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Fig. 7. Compressive strength evolution, MPa (a), FS to CS ratio (b), numerical data (c).
pozzolanic reaction, ii) the inclusion of porous structures that, in the case of G-mixes are broken, Fig. 6 (b), and iii) the weaker ITZ
formed, Fig. 16.
When compressive strength and apparent density are correlated, Fig. 7c, it can be observed that the CS/ρb ratio is higher for G-SCBA
9
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Fig. 10. (a) Surface Electrical Resistivity and (b) correlations between surface electrical resistivity and RCMT.
mixes. This can be interpreted as the major capacity of ground ashes to promote the production of CSH gel by the facilitation of more
nucleation sites [44], blocking the microstructure channels and creating isolated pores and therefore, reducing the open porosity and
the apparent density.
10
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Fig. 11. (a) Chloride migration coefficient at 7d, 28d,56d and 90d; and specimens Con-56d (b) and G20-56d (c).
were more significant than those observed for G-specimens and G30 in specific. Moreover, the non-steady state chloride migration
coefficients are much lower for blended mixes regardless the treatment. Consequently, it can be concluded that this test should not be
used by its own to assess the risk of aggressive agent attack in cementitious materials containing SCMs.
3.5.1. XRD
Fig. 12 shows the diffraction pattern of pastes at 7, 14, 28, 56 and 90 days of curing. By comparing the patterns at different ages the
different hydration products kinetics can be analysed in their crystalline forms. The main change is the one that affects the portlandite,
CH (Ca(OH)2) and CSH gel. In control samples CH continues forming over time as per CSH. On the other hand, in blended pastes CH
decreases while crystalline calcium silicate hydrates (CSH) and calcium aluminate silicate hydrates (CASH) increases as a result of the
formation of the latter through the consumption of the former. There is a major presence of CH in Ut20 than in G20 pastes confirming
11
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
that grinding, besides contributing to the formation of CSH and CASH as a result of the pozzolanic reaction, accelerates the formation
of these compounds through the provision of additional nucleation sites. The presence of quartz (Q) is attributable to the quartz
contained in ashes. SCBA contain higher amounts of gypsum, sodium, chlorides, magnesium and sulphates than sand, consequently,
the formation of harmful compounds needs to be controled [45]. It can be observed that the addition of SCBA ashes promotes the
formation of ettringite (3CaO⋅Al2O3⋅3CaSO4⋅32H2O) through the reaction of the additional gypsum (CaSO4) with calcium aluminate
hydrates (C3A and C4AF). Ettringite (E) -AFt group-rapidly forms since early ages and observed up to 90 days being more significant in
mixes containing Ut-SCBA, regardless incorporating the same amount of substitution rate as G20 specimens, meanwhile in the control
specimens it is observable from 28d, Fig. 12. Well crystallised needled products are easily detectable in SEM images. Regardless the
crystallinisation, the size and stability depends on the environment they form and grow [46]. In parallel, the formation of
AFm-hemicarboaluminate (Hc) appears in pastes from early ages in all blended mixes and monocarbonates are clearly formed at 28d
12
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Fig. 14. Apparent quantification of CSH, CH and CaCO3 by means of TG-DTA at 28 and 56d
13
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Fig. 15. FT IR spectra of Con, Ut20, G10, G20 and G30 at 3, 7, 28, 56 and 90d.
with higher intensity peaks in Ut-SCBA. The use of G-SCBA delays the formation of monocarbonates in pastes. This can be explained by
the carbonation of pastes through which, due to the reaction with CO2, the ettringite is prevented to convert into monosulfate which
can lead to the formation of additional expansive ettringite [45]. Friedel’s Salt (FS) was discretly observed by means of XRD and
confirmed by means of SEM-EDS. FS formation correspons to the chemical binding of the admixed chlorides contained in the ashes by
the chloride ions uptake capability of AFm hydrates. These compounds are expected to create more stable bonds than those that may
form with entered chlorides. Other undesiderate products such as brucite (Mg(OH)2) were not observed.
3.5.2. TGA
Powders from pastes cured for 28 and 56d were analysed by means of TGA-DTA, Fig. 13. Changes in mass loss due to the thermal
decomposition (TGA) were then measured and attributed to the corresponding hydration product based on the ranges observed in
DTA. Up to 105 ◦ C, the mass loss is attributed to the unbound or weakly bound water. The weight loss occurring between 60 and 400 ◦ C
corresponds to the dehydration of CSH, AFt and AFm phases. The mass loss concentrated between 400 and 465 ◦ C corresponds to the
dehydroxilation of portlandite (CH) into CaO. The mass loss occurring at 630–800 is due to the decomposition of CaCO3. The value of
the ranges are approximately, since these swift to the right in the case of mixes containing ground ashes at 56d.
According to the TGA results, the addition of 10% of G-SCBA promotes higher amounts of CSH gel, either at 28d and 56d, Fig. 14.
14
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Based on TGA, Ut-SCBA and control samples would promote the formation of more quantity of CSH gel at 28d than G20 and G30,
regardless the observations made along this document. These discrepancies lie on the fact that CSH curve overlaps the curves of other
hydration products such as AFt and free water, resulting in inaccurate results. On the other hand, the portlandite content decreases
with the increase of substitution rate of ground ashes within the mix, that could be interpreted as a major consumption of CH in the
pozzolanic reaction. Nevertheless, there are no direct correlations between the apparent production of CSH gel and the consumption of
CH for pastes containing 20% and 30% of ground ashes. This is in agreement with the FTIR where the band at 960 cm− 1 is less sharp for
G30 than other mixes. This may demonstrate the existence of a limit substitution rate from which the system saturates and the hy
dration process is delayed. Additionally, future investigations on higher SR may consider the limited calcium content available for the
pozzolanic reaction, thus, a portion of SCBA may remain unreacted.
The presence of CaCO3 is due to the carbonation of the sample. The weight loss due to the decomposition of the calcium carbonate
shows that untreated ashes promotes de carbonation of the samples, while by grinding this phenomenon is counteracted. This is
attributable to the more porous structure of mortars and pastes containing Ut-SCBA that ease the diffusion of CO2. Up to 28 days the
higher the substitution rate of ground ashes, the lower the presence of CaCO3. Nevertheless, at 56d all mixes containing ground ashes
show similar rates of CaCO3.
3.5.3. FTIR
FTIR spectra for Con, Ut20, G10, G20 and G30 at 3, 7, 28, 56 and 90 days are shown in Fig. 15. The O–C–O bands for carbonate phases
appear in all spectra in the bands 1414–1427 and 870-876 cm− 1. The intensity is reduced, and the band becomes wider over time for all
spectra up to 56d. After 90d, this is reverted potentially due to the carbonation process of samples that affect all samples but G30. In this
terms, Ut and G20 pastes seems to be more affected. This agrees with the results obtained in TGA for these samples. This is a matter of
interest for future research to investigate the performance of these mixes in terms of carbonation resistance and carbon uptake.
The Si–O vibration bands at 3640 and 1091 cm− 1 decrease along time corresponding with the consumption of Ca(OH)2 during the
15
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
pozzolanic reaction with amorphous SiO2. The resulted CSH and CASH are observable at around 960 cm− 1 (Si–O asymmetric
stretching vibration) where bands are more intense and narrower with increased in curing age. The addition of treated and untreated
SCBA makes the bands to shift to higher wave-number indicating a modification in the Ca/Si ratio as a result of the increasing
polymerisation and the subsequent de-calcification process [47]. Nevertheless, after 28d the bands slightly shift to lower wave-number
that may respond to the initial carbonation of samples that imply the decomposition of CSH gel in CaCO3 and amorphous silica gel. In
the case of Ut20, this band increases after 28d and clearly increases at 90d confirming the existence of delayed pozzolanic reaction
obtained from OP, (ρsur) and CS. These phases may hinder the existence of less representative AFt and AFm phases such as
mono-carboaluminate, hemi-carboaluminate or stratlingite with medium intensity bands at 953-954cm-1 (Al–O) [47].
Unaltered vibration bands at 688-710 cm− 1 correspond with crystalline quartz, also observable in non-blended samples. The O–H
bands at 3658-3611 cm-1, noticed in all bands, is representative of portlandite which is clearly reduced over time in mixes containing
SCBA. The band observed at around 1115 (S–O; [SO4]2-) shows the existence of ettringite, observable in Con, G10, G20 and G30 spectra.
It can be notice that for all pastes the bands shifts towards higher wave-number along with curing age. In the case of untreated ashes
this band is shifted to the right indicating the formation of less strong bonds.
16
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Fig. 18. Radial chart of Control, G10, G20, G30 specimens at a) 7 days, b) 28 days, c) 56 days and d) 90 days. CS: compressive strength (MPa); W: relative increase in
casting water, (%); SR: substitution rate of fine aggregates by ashes (SR); OP: open porosity (%); ρsur: surface electrical resistivity (kOhm.cm); RCM: Rapid chloride
migration coefficient (x10− 12 m2/s); Dapp: apparent density (kg/m3 x 10− 2).
Table 5
Performance of mortars at 28d when using different functional units: a) compressive strength and b) amount of ashes used.
(a)
Con – – – – –
G10 3.33 0.31 9.00 2.06 0.037
G20 1.67 0.17 4.00 0.92 0.007
G30 1.11 0.10 2.33 0.57 0.006
occurring due to carbonation, while the later are more stable although can be also reversed in acidic environment [53,54]. Therefore,
the use of SCBA as new mineral admixture can be beneficial in terms of CBC by supplying a higher amount of aluminates and silicates.
Additional aluminates in SCBA can bind the chlorides within the ashes by forming FS as shown in Fig. 12, while still available
17
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
aluminates could react with entered chlorides. However, considering the production of CSH, physically adsorbed chlorides might be
predominant in this type of mixes. Additionally, the char particles provided by Ut-SCBA are expected to have an additional adsorbent
capacity for the chlorides [55].
The physical modification lies on the consumption of portlandite by the additional reactive SiO2 promoting the generation of
secondary CSH and CASH. At very early ages (1d and 3d) the lower results of ρsur obtained in G-specimens in contrast to the higher
results for CS when compared to control specimens justify the initial filler effect of ground ashes.
The outperforming performance of G-SCBA in comparison to that of Ut-SCBA confirms the ability of grinding in providing more
nucleation sites and, hence, promoting the mineralogical formation of CSH and CASH [44].
4. Conclusions
This research investigates the use of sugarcane bagasse ash as high-performance fine aggregate for cementitious materials. For this
purpose, ashes were treated by grinding, and the performance of mortars and pastes containing different substitution rates analysed
and compared with samples containing untreated ashes and samples without ashes. A combination of analytical techniques was used to
validate the performance-based experimental campaign results. Tests were carried out from 3 to 90 days. It can be concluded that:
• Ut-SCBA contain big porous particles that reduces the workability of mortars and increase the water demand (+68%), delivering
more porous mortars. As a result, reductions in compressive strength of 52,5% at 28d were obtained.
• After the mechanical treatment, grinding, the water demand of Ut-SCBA has decreased by 34.5%.
• The incorporation of G-SCBA enhances the compressive strength of mortars up to 62% at 28d, decreases the porosity by 35%, highly
improves the resistance to the diffusion of chlorides by 10 times and enhances the chloride electrical resistivity, up to 4 and 4.5
times at 28d in comparison to control specimens.
• G-SCBA improves the interfacial transition zone by narrowing and closing the gap between aggregates and pastes, potentially
attributable to the higher supply of micro particles.
• The mechanisms behind the G-SCBA mechanical and durability performance are the refinement and blockage of the pore structure
by the supply of more nucleation sites and the formation of secondary CSH and CASH.
• Grinding SCBA facilitates the use of higher amounts of industrial SCBA in the production of OPC systems. The optimum substitution
rate at 28d was found to be 20% due to the increasing water demand with the SR. After 90d enhancements are still observed in all
compositions containing SCBA, with major intensity in Ut20 and G30.
G-SCBA can be used as mineral admixture in the production of cementitious materials able to increase the compressive strength and
the chlorides penetration resistance extending the service life. It can be potentially also used in concrete production. This research
finds a solution for ashes that are not suitable for cement substitution as per BS EN 450–1, and leverages the total mass of material,
without producing further discards.
Authors Statement
The specific contributions made by each author are listed below: Veronica Torres de Sande: Conceptualisation, Methodology,
Investigation, Writing – original draft and review & editing. Monower Sadique: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Writing – original
draft and review & editing. Paloma Pineda: conceptualisation, Methodology, Writing – original draft and review. Ana Bras: reviewing,
Writing – original draft
18
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
Data availability
Acknowledgments
The authors of this paper wish to acknowledge the support of the LJMU for the fully funded PhD Scholarship to Veronica Torres de
Sande and San Pedro Bioenergy for supplying the ashes.
References
[1] D.-Y. Oh, T. Noguchi, R. Kitagaki, W.-J. Park, CO2 emission reduction by reuse of building material waste in the Japanese cement industry, Renew. Sustain.
Energy Rev. 38 (2014) 796–810.
[2] V. Beiser, The World in a Grain: the Story of Sand and How it Is Transformed Civilization, first ed. ed., Riverhead Books, 2018.
[3] WWF, in: L. Koehnken, M. Rintoul (Eds.), Impacts of Sand Mining on Ecosystem Structure, Process and Biodiversity in Rivers, 2018.
[4] U.N.E.P. Unep, Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity. Assessment Report for the UNEP International Resource Panel, 2016.
[5] OECD, HIGHLIGHTS Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060 – Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences, 2019.
[6] F.a.A.O.o.t.U.N. FAO, FAOSTAT - Compared Data, 2020.
[7] V. Torres de Sande, M. Sadique, P. Pineda, A. Bras, W. Atherton, M. Riley, Potential use of sugar cane bagasse ash as sand replacement for durable concrete,
J. Build. Eng. (2021), 102277.
[8] A. Sales, S.A. Lima, Use of Brazilian sugarcane bagasse ash in concrete as sand replacement, Waste Manag. 30 (6) (2010) 1114–1122.
[9] M. Zhao, Z. Han, C. Sheng, H. Wu, Characterization of residual carbon in fly ashes from power plants firing biomass, Energy Fuel. 27 (2) (2013) 898–907.
[10] British Standard Institution, BS EN 450-1:2012. Fly Ash for Concrete, Definition, specifications and conformity criteria, 2012.
[11] A. Rajasekar, K. Arunachalam, M. Kottaisamy, V. Saraswathy, Durability characteristics of Ultra High Strength Concrete with treated sugarcane bagasse ash,
Construct. Build. Mater. 171 (2018) 350–356.
[12] R. Somna, C. Jaturapitakkul, P. Rattanachu, W. Chalee, Effect of ground bagasse ash on mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete,
Mater. Des. 36 (2012) 597–603 (1980-2015).
[13] N. Chusilp, C. Jaturapitakkul, K. Kiattikomol, Utilization of bagasse ash as a pozzolanic material in concrete, Construct. Build. Mater. 23 (11) (2009)
3352–3358.
[14] J.C. Arenas-Piedrahita, P. Montes-García, J.M. Mendoza-Rangel, H.Z. López Calvo, P.L. Valdez-Tamez, J. Martínez-Reyes, Mechanical and durability properties
of mortars prepared with untreated sugarcane bagasse ash and untreated fly ash, Construct. Build. Mater. 105 (2016) 69–81.
[15] M.A. Maldonado-García, U.I. Hernández-Toledo, P. Montes-García, P.L. Valdez-Tamez, The influence of untreated sugarcane bagasse ash on the microstructural
and mechanical properties of mortars, Mater. Construcción 68 (329) (2018).
[16] P.O. Modani, M.R. Vyawahare, Utilization of bagasse ash as a partial replacement of fine aggregate in concrete, Procedia Eng. 51 (2013) 25–29.
[17] P.C. Macedo, A.M. Pereira, J.L. Akasaki, C.F. Fioriti, J. Payá, J.L.P. Melges, Performance of mortars produced with the incorporation of sugar cane bagasse ash,
Rev. Ingen. de Constr. 29 (2) (2014) 187–199.
[18] S. Ghannam, H. Najm, R. Vasconez, Experimental study of concrete made with granite and iron powders as partial replacement of sand, Sustain. Mater. Tech. 9
(2016) 1–9.
[19] A. Bahurudeen, D. Kanraj, V. Gokul Dev, M. Santhanam, Performance evaluation of sugarcane bagasse ash blended cement in concrete, Cement Concr. Compos.
59 (2015) 77–88.
[20] A. Rerkpiboon, W. Tangchirapat, C. Jaturapitakkul, Strength, chloride resistance, and expansion of concretes containing ground bagasse ash, Construct. Build.
Mater. 101 (2015) 983–989.
[21] J.T. Kolawole, A.J. Babafemi, E. Fanijo, S. Chandra Paul, R. Combrinck, State-of-the-art review on the use of sugarcane bagasse ash in cementitious materials,
Cement Concr. Compos. 118 (2021), 103975.
[22] S.-C. Pan, D.-H. Tseng, C.-C. Lee, C. Lee, Influence of the fineness of sewage sludge ash on the mortar properties, Cement Concr. Res. 33 (11) (2003) 1749–1754.
[23] G.C. Cordeiro, R.D. Toledo Filho, L.M. Tavares, E.M.R. Fairbairn, Pozzolanic activity and filler effect of sugar cane bagasse ash in Portland cement and lime
mortars, Cement Concr. Compos. 30 (5) (2008) 410–418.
[24] G. Cordeiro, R. Toledo Filho, L. Tavares, E. Fairbairn, Ultrafine grinding of sugar cane bagasse ash for application as pozzolanic admixture in concrete, Cement
Concr. Res. 39 (2009) 110–115.
[25] J. Payá, J. Monzó, M.V. Borrachero, M.M. Tashima, L. Soriano, 17 - bagasse ash, in: R. Siddique, P. Cachim (Eds.), Waste and Supplementary Cementitious
Materials in Concrete, Woodhead Publishing, 2018, pp. 559–598.
[26] T. Murugesan, R. Vidjeapriya, A. Bahurudeen, Sugarcane bagasse ash-blended concrete for effective resource utilization between sugar and construction
industries, Sugar Tech. 22 (5) (2020) 858–869.
[27] Bristish Standards Institution, BS EN 196-2:2013. Method of Testing Cement, Chemical analysis of cement, 2013.
[28] M. Fan, R. Brown, Comparison of the loss-on-ignition and thermogravimetric analysis techniques in measuring unburned carbon in coal fly ash, Fuel Energy
Abstr. 43 (2001).
[29] G.C. Cordeiro, L.M. Tavares, R.D. Toledo Filho, Improved pozzolanic activity of sugar cane bagasse ash by selective grinding and classification, Cement Concr.
Res. 89 (2016) 269–275.
[30] British Standard Institution, BI ISO 13320-1:2009. Particle Size Analysis, Laser diffraction methods, 2009.
[31] Bristish Standards Institution, BS EN 1097-6:2013. Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates, Determin. part. dens. water absorp. (2013).
[32] b.S. Institution, BS EN 196-6:2018. Method of Testing Cement. Part 6: Determination of Fineness, 2018.
[33] B.S. Institution, BS EN 196-1:2016. Method of Testing Cement. Part 1: Determination of Strength, 2016.
[34] B.S. Institution, BS EN 1015-3:1999. Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry. Part 3: Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar, 1999 (by flow table).
[35] B.S. Institution, BS EN 1015-6:1999. Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry. Part 6: Determination of Bulk Density of Fresh Mortar, 1999.
[36] British Standard Institution, BS EN 1936: 2006. Natural Stone Test Methods. Determination of Real Density and Apparent Density, and of Total and Open
Porosity, 2006.
[37] Bristish Standards Institution, BS EN 1015-18:2002. Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry. Determination of Water Absorption Coefficient Due to Capillary
Action of Hardened Mortar, 2002.
[38] NORDEST, NT BUILD 492. Concrete, Mortar and Cement-Based Repair Materials: Chloride Migration Coefficient from Non-steady-state Migration Experiments,
1999.
[39] M. Sadique, H. Al-Nageim, W. Atherton, L. Seton, N. Dempster, Analytical investigation of hydration mechanism of a non-Portland binder with waste paper
sludge ash, Construct. Build. Mater. 211 (2019) 80–87.
[40] V.T.d.S.M.S.A.B.P. Pineda, Experimental techniques for assessing the chloride binding mechanisms in eco-efficient cement-based materials by using SCM: a
critical analysis, J. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2021).
[41] P. Azarsa, R. Gupta, Electrical resistivity of concrete for durability evaluation: a review, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017 (2017) 1–30.
[42] W. Morris, E.I. Moreno, A.A. Sagüés, Practical evaluation of resistivity of concrete in test cylinders using a Wenner array probe, Cement Concr. Res. 26 (12)
(1996) 1779–1787.
19
V. Torres de Sande et al. Journal of Building Engineering 59 (2022) 105082
[43] R. Yu, P. Spiesz, H.J.H. Brouwers, Effect of Nano-Silica on the Hydration and Microstructure Development of Ultra-high Performance Concrete (UHPC) with a
Low Binder Amount, 2019.
[44] X. Ouyang, D.A. Koleva, G. Ye, K. van Breugel, Insights into the mechanisms of nucleation and growth of C–S–H on fillers, Mater. Struct. 50 (5) (2017) 213.
[45] P. Azarsa, R. Gupta, Electrical resistivity of concrete for durability evaluation: a review, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017 (2017), 8453095.
[46] G. Paul, E. Boccaleri, L. Buzzi, F. Canonico, D. Gastaldi, Friedel’s salt formation in sulfoaluminate cements: a combined XRD and 27Al MAS NMR study, Cement
Concr. Res. 67 (2015) 93–102.
[47] M. Horgnies, J. Chen, C. Bouillon, Overview of the Use of Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Cementitious Materials, 2013.
[48] A. Joshaghani, M.A. Moeini, Evaluating the effects of sugar cane bagasse ash (SCBA) and nanosilica on the mechanical and durability properties of mortar,
Construct. Build. Mater. 152 (2017) 818–831.
[49] A. Hussein, N. Shafiq, M. Nuruddin, F. Memon, Compressive strength and microstructure of sugar cane bagasse ash concrete, Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 7
(2014) 2569–2577.
[50] J. Wang, A.P. Jivkov, Q.M. Li, D.L. Engelberg, Experimental and numerical investigation of mortar and ITZ parameters in meso-scale models of concrete, Theor.
Appl. Fract. Mech. 109 (2020), 102722.
[51] P. Pineda, S. Medina-Carrasco, A. Iranzo, L. Borau, I. García-Jiménez, Pore structure and interdisciplinary analyses in Roman mortars: building techniques and
durability factors identification, Construct. Build. Mater. 317 (2022), 125821.
[52] Y. Gao, C. Hu, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Pan, Characterisation of the interfacial transition zone in mortars by nanoindentation and scanning electron microscope, Mag.
Concr. Res. 70 (18) (2018) 965–972.
[53] H. Zibara, Binding of External Chlorides by Cement Pastes, 2001.
[54] L.-O. Nilsson, Overview of Prediction Models for Chloride Ingress into Concrete Structures, Nordic Mini Seminar & 1st, Göteborg, 2001 fib TG 5.5 meeting.
[55] V.A. Franco-Luján, M.A. Maldonado-García, J.M. Mendoza-Rangel, P. Montes-García, Chloride-induced reinforcing steel corrosion in ternary concretes
containing fly ash and untreated sugarcane bagasse ash, Construct. Build. Mater. 198 (2019) 608–618.
[56] J.M. Danatzko, H. Sezen, Sustainable structural design methodologies, Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Construct. 16 (4) (2011) 186–190.
20